The author's approach has been shaped by careful study of the scholarly work of Dr Henriette Harmse (European Bioinformatics Institute) and Dr Marie Keet (University of Cape Town).
Dr Edit Hlaszny (domain expert, editor, data modeller, IT architect, programmer)
The ontology contains 701 classes (BFO-2020: 36, domain: 665) describing essential concepts of sociology
OWL/XML encoding (+several serialisations on NCBO BioPortal)
Dr Hlaszny Biosystems Engineering: In Vivo Integration of Neural Parenchyma
This ontology is distributed under an Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). The License is: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Copyright: Dr Edit Hlaszny (2025-)
OCS -- Ontology for Computational Sociology
edithlaszny@gmail.com (preferred) | edit@edithlaszny.eu
"(Official resolution of disputes through formal legal or institutional decision-making processes.)"
"(Legal or social establishment of parent-child relationships independent of biological reproduction.)"
"(Active promotion and support of specific policies, causes, or group interests.)"
"(Active support and representation of interests, rights, or positions of others.)"
"(Temporal process of individual development and changing social roles throughout life course.)"
"(Replacement of human labor or decision-making with technological systems.)"
"(Relationship indicating formal or informal inclusion within groups, organisations, or social categories.)"
"(Biological relationship establishing kinship and demographic population entry.)"
"(Authority derived from formal rules, procedures, and legally established institutional positions.)"
"(Authority legitimised through custom, precedent, and historically established patterns of social organisation.)"
"(Connection linking different social groups, communities, or networks, facilitating information flow.)"
"(Mass distribution of information, entertainment, or cultural content to large audiences.)"
"(Implementation of formal rules, hierarchies, and procedures for organisational efficiency and control.)"
"(Provision of support, assistance, or nurturing to individuals with physical or emotional needs.)"
"(This property defines the relationship where a subject, such as an outcome, effect, or result, is created or brought into being by a specific causal event. It formalises the causal link from the process to its tangible or intangible output.)"
"(Direct cause-effect relationship where one entity's actions or properties directly determine outcomes in another.)"
"(Influence based on force, threat, or punishment to compel compliance or specific behaviours.)"
"(Relationship involving shared physical or social space and mutual presence.)"
"(Cooperative interaction working together toward shared goals or common objectives.)"
"(Exchange of information, ideas, or messages through various verbal and non-verbal channels.)"
"(Rivalry or contest for resources, recognition, status, or achievement.)"
"(Temporary gathering or assembly in shared physical or virtual spaces.)"
"(This property defines the relationship where a specific causal event receives a contribution from a subject, such as an action, factor, or entity. It models the outcome of a causal process and the entities that helped to bring it about.)"
"(Relationship involving management, direction, or domination over resources, processes, or other entities.)"
"(Systematic organisation and synchronisation of activities, resources, or organisational functions.)"
"(Professional guidance and support for psychological, emotional, or behavioural issues.)"
"(Common participation in cultural practices, beliefs, symbols, and meaning systems.)"
"(Transfer of authority, responsibility, or tasks from higher to lower organisational levels.)"
"(Departure from established social norms, expectations, or institutionally sanctioned behaviour patterns.)"
"(Professional identification and classification of medical or psychological conditions.)"
"(Transformation of social processes, interactions, or cultural practices through digital technologies.)"
"(Differential treatment based on group membership rather than individual merit or characteristics.)"
"(Connection involving exchange, distribution, or control of material resources and economic value.)"
"(Formal or informal transmission of knowledge, skills, and cultural understanding.)"
"(Formal work relationship where one entity provides labor in exchange for compensation.)"
"(Reciprocal, meaningful conversation involving mutual exchange of ideas and understanding.)"
"(Systematic prevention of access to opportunities, resources, or social participation.)"
"(Controlled manipulation of variables to test hypotheses about social behaviour or phenomena.)"
"(Asymmetric economic relationship where one entity benefits disproportionately from another's labor or resources.)"
"(Authority based on exceptional personal qualities, inspiration, or perceived extraordinary capabilities.)"
"(Temporal relationship indicating sequence, succession, or chronological ordering of social phenomena.)"
"(Official membership with recognised status, rights, and obligations within structured organisations.)"
"(Transformation of informal practices into official rules, procedures, or recognised structures.)"
"(Voluntary, reciprocal relationship characterised by mutual affection, trust, and companionship.)"
"(Neighborhood transformation involving middle-class displacement of lower-income residents.)"
"(Exercise of political authority and decision-making power over populations or territories.)"
"(Legitimate power recognised and accepted within specific institutional or social contexts.)"
"(Relationship characterised by disagreement, competition, opposition, or antagonistic interactions.)"
"(Indicates one entity's capacity to affect another's behaviour, decisions, or outcomes through various mechanisms.)"
"(Unofficial belonging based on participation, acceptance, or identification without formal recognition.)"
"(Direct or indirect social contact involving mutual awareness and behavioural responses.)"
"(Relationship based on blood, marriage, adoption, or other recognised forms of family connection.)-"
"(Influence exercised through social norms, expectations, and moral frameworks that guide behaviour.)"
"(Active involvement or engagement in social activities, processes, or collective endeavors.)"
"(Influence achieved through rational argument, emotional appeal, or credible communication to change attitudes.)"
"(Asymmetric relationship where one entity possesses capacity to control, dominate, or direct another's actions.)"
"(Relationship established through work, career, or professional activities and responsibilities.)"
"(General social connection or association between entities involving interaction, mutual awareness, or interdependence.)"
"(Intimate relationship involving emotional attachment, physical attraction, or romantic commitment.)"
"(Broader social connection indicating various forms of social bonding or network membership.)"
"(Close, frequent, emotionally intense social connection with significant mutual influence and support.)"
"(Influence arising from position within social structures, institutions, or organisational hierarchies.)"
"(Distant, infrequent social connection that may provide access to diverse information and opportunities.)"
"(Long-term impact of past events, persons, or processes on subsequent social developments.)"
"(Psychological or cultural connection involving shared values, beliefs, or perceived similarity.)"
"(Interactive process of discussion and compromise to reach agreements or resolve differences.)"
"(Relationship between social groups and their physical or constructed environments.)"
"(Creation of new cultural forms, practices, or technologies within social contexts.)"
"(Process of establishing stable, recognised patterns of social organisation and behaviour.)"
"(Process of assigning meaning, significance, or understanding to cultural symbols or social phenomena.)"
"(Structured or unstructured conversation for gathering data, opinions, or personal experiences.)"
"(Directing, coordinating, or taking primary responsibility for organizing social activities or processes.)"
"(Creation, modification, or enforcement of laws and formal rules governing social behaviour.)"
"(Legitimises is a forward object property that asserts that a subject, typically an institution or a process, grants legitimacy to an object, such as a rule, a regime, or an authority . It captures the action of providing justification or validity to something, making it widely accepted and deserving of support. The property legitimisedBy asserts the opposite relationship: an object (a rule, a regime) receives its legitimacy from a subject (an institution, a custom, or a process) . It captures the state of being accepted as just and valid due to its source of authority.)"
"(Common use of linguistic systems for communication and cultural expression.)"
"(Administrative control and responsibility for operations, decisions, or organisational functions.)"
"(Process of pushing individuals or groups to social periphery, reducing access and participation.)"
"(Transition from childhood to adult status involving biological, psychological, and social development.)"
"(Quantitative or qualitative assessment of social variables, characteristics, or phenomena.)"
"(Role of communication technologies and media in shaping social interaction and cultural transmission.)"
"(Process of defining social problems or human conditions as medical issues requiring treatment.)"
"(Guidance relationship involving experienced individual supporting another's development and learning.)"
"(Movement of populations between geographic areas involving social and cultural adaptation.)"
"(Activation and organisation of resources, people, or groups for collective political action.)"
"(Systematic observation and assessment of behaviour, compliance, or performance.)"
"(Physical proximity relationship involving shared geographic location or community space.)"
"(Connection of individuals or groups through communication technologies or social platforms.)"
"(Professional or informal provision of health care, comfort, and assistance to dependent individuals.)"
"(Direct or indirect monitoring of social behaviour, interactions, or phenomena for research purposes.)"
"(Translation of abstract concepts into measurable, observable indicators for empirical research.)"
"(Legal or recognised possession and control over property, assets, or resources.)"
"(Maintenance and protection of cultural traditions, knowledge, or practices against loss or change.)"
"(Systematic advantages or benefits accorded to certain groups based on social position.)"
"(Organised expression of dissent, resistance, or demands for social or political change.)"
"(Transfer of resources, services, or support from one entity to another.)"
"(Systematic ordering of social positions according to prestige, power, or other valued characteristics.)"
"(One-directional flow of data, knowledge, or messages from source to recipient.)"
"(Relationship involving establishment and enforcement of rules, norms, or standards governing behaviour.)"
"(Efforts to restore individuals to acceptable social functioning after deviance or institutional processing.)"
"(Process of returning formerly excluded individuals to full participation in social institutions.)"
"(Symbolic relationship where one entity stands for, symbolises, or speaks for another.)"
"(Biological and social processes of population continuation and cultural transmission across generations.)"
"(Intensive process of learning new norms, values, and behaviours to replace previous patterns.)"
"(Withdrawal from active employment, often involving significant role and status transitions.)"
"(Transformation of activities into symbolic, ceremonial practices with cultural significance.)"
"(Attribution of sacred, holy, or transcendent qualities to objects, practices, or spaces.)"
"(Application of positive or negative consequences to encourage or discourage specific behaviours.)"
"(Spatial or institutional separation of groups, typically maintaining inequality and limiting interaction.)"
"(Relationship involving common possession, experience, or participation in cultural elements.)"
"(Common commitment to similar principles, beliefs, or moral frameworks.)"
"(Process of transmitting culture, norms, values, and expected behaviours to individuals.)"
"(Process of marking individuals or groups as socially undesirable or morally discredited.)"
"(Hierarchical arrangement of individuals or groups based on differential access to resources or status.)"
"(Systematic investigation or examination of social phenomena through various research methodologies and approaches.)"
"(Population movement from urban centers to peripheral residential areas.)"
"(Direct oversight and guidance of subordinates' work performance and organisational compliance.)"
"(Providing assistance, resources, or encouragement to social activities without primary leadership roles.)"
"(Systematic collection of standardised information from populations or samples using questionnaires.)"
"(Relationship where one entity serves as symbol, sign, or representation of broader concepts.)"
"(Establishment of control, ownership, or exclusive use over specific geographic areas.)"
"(Exchange of goods, services, or resources based on mutual benefit and agreement.)"
"(Active violation of moral, legal, or social boundaries through deliberate norm-breaking behaviour.)"
"(Process of passing cultural knowledge, practices, or traditions across time or between groups.)"
"(Medical or therapeutic intervention to address illness, injury, or psychological conditions.)"
"(Process of population concentration and social transformation associated with city development.)"
"(Confirmation of measurement accuracy, reliability, or theoretical correspondence in research instruments.)"
"(Creation of online or digital alternatives to physical spaces and face-to-face interactions.)"
"This boolean data property identifies components that play primary or central roles within a causal relationship according to theoretical emphasis or empirical significance. When set to true, it indicates that this entity represents a major causal driver or critical outcome that is theoretically privileged or empirically dominant in the relationship. This property helps distinguish between core mechanisms and peripheral factors in complex sociological processes, enabling researchers to identify which elements deserve primary analytical attention. It supports hierarchical understanding of causal relationships by marking theoretically essential components that should receive priority in research design, policy interventions, or educational presentations of sociological knowledge."
"This property specifies the level of social organisation at which causal relationships operate. Sociological phenomena can involve individual-level, group-level, institutional-level, or societal-level processes, and causal mechanisms may operate differently at different levels. This property prevents inappropriate aggregation or disaggregation of causal claims across levels of analysis."
"This property quantifies the degree of confidence in a causal relationship's validity. It addresses the epistemological challenge that sociological causation often involves probabilistic rather than deterministic relationships. The property allows researchers to express varying levels of certainty about causal claims, acknowledging that some relationships are well-established through extensive empirical evidence while others remain tentative or contested within the discipline."
"This property indicates the breadth of social contexts within which a causal relationship operates. Some sociological patterns are universal across cultures and historical periods, while others are highly context-specific. This property allows ontological modelling of whether causal relationships apply broadly across different societies, demographic groups, or historical periods, or whether they are constrained to particular social contexts."
"This data property quantifies the epistemological reliability of a component's role within a specific causal relationship. It represents domain expert assessment of how well-supported the theoretical or empirical basis is for including this particular entity as a causal factor or outcome. The decimal value reflects the strength of evidence from sociological research, ranging from speculative theoretical connections to well-established empirical relationships. This property enables systematic documentation of uncertainty and confidence levels in complex sociological models, allowing researchers to distinguish between core theoretical claims and more tentative propositions. It facilitates meta-analysis of causal knowledge by providing explicit measures of evidential support for different aspects of sociological relationships."
"This property assesses whether causal relationships hold across different cultural contexts. Many sociological generalisations are based on research from specific cultural settings, raising questions about their universal applicability. This property allows modelling of the cultural specificity or generalizability of causal claims, which is essential for global sociology."
"This property indicates how clearly the direction of causation can be established. Many sociological relationships involve reciprocal causation or complex feedback loops where variables influence each other mutually. This property assesses whether causal direction is unambiguous, bidirectional, or indeterminate, which is crucial for theoretical understanding and policy implications."
"This property quantifies the practical significance or size of causal effects. Statistical significance doesn't necessarily indicate practical importance - a relationship might be statistically reliable but substantively trivial. This property captures whether causal effects are large enough to matter for understanding or intervening in social phenomena, complementing measures of statistical reliability."
"This property evaluates the strength of empirical evidence supporting a causal claim. It reflects the methodological rigor and replication success of studies documenting the relationship. This is crucial in sociology where research methods vary widely in their capacity to establish causation, from experimental designs to ethnographic observations, each providing different levels of causal evidence."
"This property indicates whether causal relationships involve ethically sensitive topics that require careful handling. Some sociological research touches on issues like discrimination, violence, or inequality that have moral implications. This property flags relationships that require ethical consideration in research design, interpretation, or policy application, ensuring responsible use of sociological knowledge."
"This property measures whether causal relationships remain consistent across historical periods or change over time. Social processes may operate differently in different historical epochs due to technological, economic, or cultural transformations. This property captures the temporal boundaries of causal validity and the dynamic nature of social relationships."
"This property indicates whether the causal relationship suggests actionable policy or social interventions. Some sociological insights point toward malleable social processes that can be influenced through institutional changes, while others describe structural constraints that are difficult to modify. This property captures the practical implications of causal knowledge for social change efforts."
"This boolean data property marks components that serve secondary or supporting roles within causal relationships, indicating entities whose contributions are theoretically acknowledged but empirically modest or contextually dependent. When true, it identifies factors that provide background conditions, catalytic effects, or minor influences rather than primary causal forces. This property enables nuanced modelling of complex sociological phenomena by recognizing that not all participants in causal relationships operate with equal theoretical weight or practical significance. It supports more sophisticated causal analysis by explicitly documenting the hierarchical structure of sociological explanations and helping researchers focus analytical resources appropriately across different levels of causal importance."
"This property assesses how precisely the causal variables can be operationalised and measured. Some sociological concepts like 'social capital' or 'cultural capital' resist precise quantification, while others like demographic indicators can be measured with high precision. This property acknowledges the varying degrees of measurement clarity that affect the strength of causal claims."
"This property assesses how well the underlying mechanisms of a causal relationship are understood. Some sociological relationships are theoretically well-explained with clear intervening variables and processes, while others are empirically observed but mechanistically opaque. This property distinguishes between well-theorised causal pathways and observed correlations where the causal mechanisms remain unclear or disputed."
"This property measures the number and complexity of intervening variables in causal chains. Some relationships involve direct causation, while others operate through elaborate sequences of mediating factors. This property captures whether causal pathways are simple and direct or involve complex chains of intermediate processes that may introduce contingencies or points of intervention."
"This property evaluates the diversity and quality of research methods used to establish causal relationships. Relationships supported by multiple methodological approaches (experimental, observational, qualitative) are generally more credible than those based on single methods. This property captures the methodological triangulation that strengthens causal inferences in sociology."
"This boolean data property designates components that occupy intermediate positions in the theoretical hierarchy of causal relationships, neither primary drivers nor merely peripheral factors. When true, it indicates entities that make substantial but not dominant contributions to sociological processes, often serving as important mediating variables or significant contextual influences. This property captures the middle ground between central and marginal causal factors, acknowledging that many sociological relationships involve multiple moderately important elements rather than simple primary-secondary distinctions. It enables more precise theoretical modelling by recognizing the complex, multi-layered nature of social causation where several factors may contribute meaningfully without any single element being overwhelmingly dominant."
"This property indicates whether causal relationships depend on specific moderating conditions or contexts. Many sociological relationships are conditional - they operate strongly under some circumstances but weakly or not at all under others. This property captures the contingent nature of social causation and the importance of scope conditions for causal claims."
"This property assesses the direct applicability of causal knowledge to policy decisions or social interventions. Some sociological insights have clear policy implications, while others are primarily of theoretical interest. This property identifies relationships that could inform evidence-based policy making, connecting academic sociology to practical social problems."
"This property indicates whether causal findings have been successfully replicated across different studies, samples, and research contexts. Replication is crucial for establishing the reliability of scientific claims, and sociology faces challenges with replicating complex social phenomena. This property tracks the replication history of causal relationships and their robustness across research efforts."
"This property records the statistical significance levels associated with empirical tests of causal relationships. It provides a standardised measure of the likelihood that observed relationships could occur by chance, which is fundamental for evaluating the reliability of quantitative sociological research findings and distinguishing robust patterns from statistical noise."
"This property measures the time delay between causal factors and their observable effects. Sociological phenomena often exhibit significant temporal gaps between causes and consequences - social movements may take decades to produce institutional change, or economic policies may show effects only across generations. This property captures the temporal complexity that distinguishes social causation from mechanical cause-effect relationships."
"This property indicates how well a causal relationship fits within broader theoretical frameworks in sociology. Some relationships are central to major theoretical paradigms like functionalism or conflict theory, while others represent isolated empirical findings. This property captures the theoretical significance and coherence of causal claims within disciplinary knowledge."
"This data property represents a unique identifier or label for a specific category within a classification system. It is used to systematically tag and organize classes, individuals, or concepts based on their type, providing a consistent and machine-readable method for categorisation within the ontology and for data analysis."
"This data property indicates the hierarchical level of a category within a classification tree. It is used to represent a concept's position in a structured hierarchy, such as an institutional or social ranking, helping to formalize and navigate the relationships between broader and more specific classifications within the ontology."
"This data property quantifies the level of severity or impact of a particular social phenomenon, issue, or event. It is a metric used to score the intensity of a condition, such as the degree of harm from a crime or the scale of an environmental hazard, providing a numerical basis for comparative analysis."
"This data property provides a unique string-based identifier for a type of entity or concept. It is used to distinguish between different kinds of phenomena or objects in the ontology (e.g., 'FormalGroup' vs. 'InformalGroup') and serves as a simple, human-readable label for categorisation and data querying."
"This data property quantifies the number of live births in a given year per thousand people in a population. It is a fundamental demographic indicator used to measure the reproductive activity of a society. The value is a decimal to allow for precise calculations and is a key component for analyzing population growth and social trends."
"This data property represents the number of individuals residing in a single household. It is a measure of family structure and living arrangements, providing insight into social patterns, economic dependencies, and housing needs within a population. The value is an integer as it denotes a count of individuals."
"This data property quantifies the number of people moving into or out of a specific territory within a given period. It is a key metric in demography for measuring population shifts and is used to analyze push and pull factors, economic impacts, and the social consequences of population movements. The value is a whole number as it represents a count of individuals."
"This data property quantifies the number of deaths in a given year per thousand people in a population. As a core demographic indicator, it measures the mortality level of a society. The value is a decimal to ensure precision in statistical analysis and is crucial for public health planning and for understanding a population's overall well-being."
"This data property represents the total number of individuals in a specified population. It is a fundamental metric for demography and social research, providing the basis for calculating rates and ratios, such as birth rates and population density. The value is an integer, representing a direct count of individuals."
"This data property represents the monetary amount allocated for a specific project, program, or function. It is a measure of financial resources assigned for a particular purpose and is used to analyze economic priorities, funding levels, and the distribution of capital within organisations or society. The value is a decimal to represent currency."
"This data property represents an estimated monetary value for the costs associated with a task, project, or event. It serves as a financial projection, allowing for the analysis of economic feasibility and efficiency, which is a key consideration in policy making and organisational planning. The value is a decimal to represent currency."
"This data property quantifies the economic effect of a social phenomenon, policy, or event. It measures the financial consequences, such as changes in revenue, costs, or market value, providing a metric for evaluating the economic implications of social actions. The value is a decimal to allow for a precise measure of impact."
"This data property represents the absolute monetary worth of a resource, good, service, or asset. It is a fundamental measure in economic analysis, used for comparing the value of different items, analyzing economic transactions, and quantifying economic status within a society. The value is a decimal to represent currency."
"This data property quantifies the degree of cultural variety and richness within a society. It is a metric used to measure the presence of different cultures, subcultures, and ethnic groups, providing a basis for analyzing social cohesion, cultural integration, and the challenges or benefits of a diverse population. The value is a decimal to represent a score or index."
"This data property quantifies the level of proficiency in a language. It is used to measure an individual's or a group's speaking, reading, or writing ability, providing a metric for analyzing social integration, cultural assimilation, and educational needs within a multilingual population. The value is a decimal to represent a score or level."
"This data property quantifies the percentage of a population that is able to read and write. It is a key indicator of a society's educational development and human capital. The value is a decimal to represent a percentage and is a crucial metric for analyzing social progress and for informing education policy."
"This data property represents the number of years of formal education an individual or a population has completed. It is a fundamental metric for assessing educational attainment and is used to analyze social stratification, social mobility, and the relationship between education and economic outcomes. The value is an integer representing a count of years."
"This data property quantifies the size of a geographical area. It is used to measure the physical extent of a region, a city, or a social setting, providing a basis for analyzing population density, resource distribution, and the spatial dimensions of social phenomena. The value is a decimal to allow for a precise measure of size."
"This data property quantifies the physical distance between two geographical points or locations. It is used to measure proximity and spatial relationships between social entities, such as communities or institutions, providing a basis for analyzing mobility, social networks, and urban patterns. The value is a decimal to represent distance."
"This data property provides a standardised code or identifier for a specific geographic location. It is used to unambiguously pinpoint a region, city, or other spatial entity, facilitating the linking of social data to geographical areas for spatial analysis and for understanding the influence of location on social phenomena."
"This data property quantifies the number of people per unit of area. It is a key metric in demography and urban sociology for measuring how crowded a space is, providing a basis for analyzing urbanism, social interaction, resource strain, and the health and social challenges of dense populations. The value is a decimal to represent a ratio."
"This data property quantifies the radius of a circular geographical area. It is used to measure the extent of influence or the boundary of a social phenomenon centered around a specific point, providing a metric for analyzing the spatial spread of ideas, behaviours, or social networks. The value is a decimal to represent a distance."
"This data property provides a unique identifier for a specific region, which can be defined by geographical or administrative boundaries. It is used to categorize social phenomena based on their location, facilitating comparative analysis across different regions and for understanding the impact of regional context on social outcomes."
"This data property quantifies the degree to which a social or economic resource is concentrated among a small number of entities. It is a metric used to measure inequality in distribution, providing a basis for analyzing economic concentration, power dynamics, and social stratification within a society. The value is a decimal to represent an index score."
"This data property quantifies the extent of power, impact, or persuasive ability one entity has over another. It is a metric used to measure the strength of social influence, political control, or cultural impact, providing a numerical basis for analyzing social dynamics and power relations. The value is a decimal to represent a score or level."
"This data property quantifies the proportion or ratio by which a resource, population, or characteristic is distributed among different groups or areas. It is a metric used to analyze social and economic inequalities, demographic patterns, and the allocation of resources within a society. The value is a decimal to represent a ratio."
"This data property represents a count of the number of times a specific event, behaviour, or phenomenon occurs within a given time period. It is a fundamental measure for analyzing social processes, trends, and patterns, providing a simple integer count of occurrences for statistical analysis."
"This data property quantifies the strength, magnitude, or intensity of a social phenomenon, feeling, or behaviour. It is a metric used to measure the emotional intensity of a crowd, the strength of a social bond, or the force of a social trend, providing a numerical basis for a more nuanced analysis. The value is a decimal to represent a level or score."
"This data property quantifies the scale or magnitude of a social phenomenon using a predefined scale. It is a metric used to measure the size of a social movement, the scope of a natural disaster, or the severity of a social problem, providing a standardised numerical basis for comparative analysis across different contexts. The value is a decimal to represent a scaled score."
"This data property quantifies the percentage of a population that is engaged in a specific activity. It is a metric used to measure social participation in events, voting, or the labor force, providing a basis for analyzing civic engagement, economic activity, and social trends within a population. The value is a decimal to represent a percentage."
"This data property quantifies a specific value as a percentage of a larger whole. It is a widely used metric in social science to represent proportions, rates, and distributions, providing a standardised way to compare parts to the whole and to analyze social and demographic trends. The value is a decimal to represent a percentage."
"This data property quantifies the number of occurrences of an event or characteristic for every thousand people in a population. It is a fundamental rate measure in demography and public health for comparing trends across different populations of varying sizes, such as birth rates or mortality rates. The value is a decimal to represent a rate."
"This data property quantifies the strength or intensity of a social connection, belief, or influence. It is a metric used to measure the strength of social ties in a network, the level of group cohesion, or the degree of social support, providing a numerical basis for analyzing social relationships. The value is a decimal to represent a score or level."
"This data property quantifies the statistical confidence level of a research finding. It is a metric used to express the probability that a research result is not due to random chance, providing a standardised measure of the trustworthiness and reliability of a study's conclusions in social science research. The value is a decimal to represent a percentage or probability score."
"This data property represents the number of observations, events, or cases recorded in a study. It is a fundamental metric for research design and data analysis, providing a count of the data points collected, which is a key component for statistical analysis and for ensuring the robustness of research findings. The value is an integer representing a direct count."
"This data property quantifies the reliability of a measurement instrument or research procedure. It is a metric used to measure the consistency and stability of a measure, indicating the degree to which it produces the same results under the same conditions. The value is a decimal to represent a coefficient score."
"This data property quantifies the percentage of individuals in a research sample who respond to a survey, questionnaire, or other data collection method. It is a key metric for assessing the quality and representativeness of a sample, as a low response rate can introduce bias into research findings. The value is a decimal to represent a percentage."
"This data property represents the total number of individuals or cases included in a research sample. It is a fundamental metric for statistical analysis and for determining the generalizability of a study's findings, with a larger sample size generally leading to more reliable and precise results. The value is an integer representing a direct count."
"This data property quantifies the validity of a measurement instrument or research study. It is a metric used to measure the extent to which a study accurately assesses what it is intended to measure, ensuring that the findings are meaningful and truthfully represent the phenomenon under investigation. The value is a decimal to represent a score or level."
"This data property quantifies a measure of social capital. It is a metric used to assess the value derived from an individual's or group's social networks, trust, and connections, providing a basis for analyzing social support, cooperation, and the resources available through social relationships. The value is a decimal to represent a score or index."
"This data property quantifies the degree of social solidarity or unity within a group or society. It is a metric used to measure the bonds that tie people together, reflecting shared values, mutual trust, and a sense of collective belonging, providing a basis for analyzing social stability and integration. The value is a decimal to represent an index score."
"This data property represents the level of a class or entity within a hierarchical structure. It is used to quantify the position in a chain of command, a social ranking, or a nested classification system, providing a numerical basis for analyzing authority relations and social stratification. The value is an integer representing the level."
"This data property represents the number of members in a specific group or organisation. It is a fundamental metric for analyzing group dynamics, organisational size, and the scale of social movements or institutions, providing a direct count of individuals for sociological analysis. The value is an integer representing a direct count."
"This data property quantifies the degree of social mobility experienced by an individual or a group. It is a metric used to measure movement up or down the social hierarchy, providing a numerical basis for analyzing social fluidity, equality of opportunity, and social stratification within a society. The value is a decimal to represent a score or index."
"This data property represents the number of individuals or nodes in a social network. It is a fundamental metric for network analysis, providing a count of the connections within a web of social ties. The value is an integer representing a direct count and is a key component for analyzing network structure and social influence."
"This data property represents the position of an individual or a group within a social ranking system. It is a metric used to quantify social status, prestige, or honor, providing a numerical basis for analyzing social hierarchies, stratification, and the distribution of social rewards within a society. The value is an integer representing a rank."
"This data property quantifies the level of trust between individuals, within a group, or in a social institution. It is a metric used to measure the degree of confidence and faith in others, providing a basis for analyzing social cohesion, cooperation, and the functioning of social systems. The value is a decimal to represent a level or score."
"This data property represents the age of an individual when a specific event occurred. It is a fundamental metric for analyzing the life course, developmental stages, and the timing of social events, providing a basis for understanding how age influences social roles, behaviours, and life experiences. The value is an integer representing a count of years."
"This data property quantifies the duration of an event, a process, or a social phenomenon. It is a metric used to measure the length of a time period, providing a basis for analyzing the temporal dynamics of social change, social movements, or individual experiences. The value is a decimal to allow for a precise measure of duration."
"This data property represents the date on which an event, a process, or a social phenomenon concluded. It is a fundamental metric for historical sociology and social research, providing a clear end point for analyzing temporal dynamics and for understanding the timeline of social events. The value is a date."
"This data property represents the position of an event or phenomenon in a sequence. It is a metric used to order events chronologically, providing a basis for analyzing causal relationships, developmental stages, and the unfolding of social processes. The value is an integer representing a sequential rank."
"This data property represents the date on which an event, a process, or a social phenomenon began. It is a fundamental metric for historical sociology and social research, providing a clear starting point for analyzing temporal dynamics and for understanding the timeline of social events. The value is a date."
"This data property quantifies the amount of time that has passed since a specific event or point in time. It is a metric used to measure the duration of a time period, providing a basis for analyzing the temporal dynamics of social phenomena and for tracking social change over time. The value is a decimal to allow for a precise measure of duration."
"This data property represents the year in which a specific event occurred. It is a fundamental metric for historical sociology and social research, providing a simple, numerical basis for analyzing the timeline of social phenomena and for understanding how social events are distributed across different historical periods. The value is an integer representing the year."
Absolute poverty, also known as subsistence poverty, defines a condition where individuals or families lack the minimal resources to meet their basic needs for survival, including food, shelter, warmth, and safety. This standard is based on a minimum level of subsistence below which families should not be expected to exist. It signifies a severe deprivation of essential necessities required for human well-being. The measurement of absolute poverty often involves a fixed income threshold that remains constant over time, although the specific level can vary between countries based on their economic conditions. The World Bank defines extreme poverty as living on less than US $1.25 or $1.90 a day. While useful for tracking income changes over time, this measure may not fully capture the realities of living in poverty, such as the inability to buy in bulk or social and cultural needs.
Achieved status refers to a social position that a person attains largely through their own efforts, skills, abilities, and choices. It is earned or chosen based on merit and reflects personal accomplishments. Examples include becoming an Olympic medalist, a college graduate, a technical professional, or even a criminal. This is in contrast to ascribed status, which is assigned at birth or is beyond an individual's control, such as race or sex. Achieved status comes with associated rights, obligations, behaviours, and duties expected of those in that position, known as roles. While ideally based on merit, the ability to achieve certain statuses can be influenced by ascribed statuses and cultural capital. Achieved status plays a significant role in open societies where social mobility, the ability to move up or down the social hierarchy, is possible.
Adoption is a legal process that allows for the permanent transfer of the legal rights, responsibilities, and privileges of parenthood to a new legal parent or parents from the biological or legal parents. Unlike guardianship, adoption is intended to create a permanent change in status, requiring societal recognition through legal or religious sanction. Historically, adoption practices often emphasised the adopter's political and economic interests, such as ensuring male heirs. However, modern adoption laws prioritise the child's welfare and development. Different types of adoption include foster care adoption, international adoption, and embryo adoption. Adoption is a complex process with emotional implications for adoptees, adoptive parents, and birth parents, often involving questions of identity and belonging. The evolution of adoption reflects changing societal values towards prioritizing the best interests of the child.
Affirmative action refers to actions favouring those who tend to suffer from discrimination, representing positive efforts to recruit minority group members or women for jobs, promotions, and educational opportunities. It aims to increase the representation of groups historically excluded from areas like employment and education. Unlike equal opportunity, which is passive, affirmative action is proactive, involving measures to avert discrimination. Policies may include preferential selection and monitoring workforce composition. Originating in the 1960s, affirmative action seeks to remedy past and present discrimination and promote diversity. However, it has faced debate, with opponents arguing it constitutes reverse discrimination, while proponents emphasise its necessity for addressing ongoing inequalities and fostering inclusion. The legal landscape surrounding affirmative action is complex and has evolved over time.
Ageing, or aging, is the combination of biological, psychological, and social processes that affect people as they grow older. Biologically, it involves physical maturation and changes in the body over time. Psychologically, it can involve shifts in cognitive function and emotional development. Sociologically, ageing entails changes in social roles, relationships, and societal expectations at different life stages. The experience of ageing is also shaped by cultural factors, with different societies having varying views on what it means to be a certain age. The human life course is often divided into stages like infancy, childhood, adolescence, adulthood, and old age, though these are somewhat arbitrary. Social gerontology is a field that specifically studies the social aspects of ageing.
Ageism is discrimination or prejudice against a person on the grounds of age. While older people are the most common targets, younger individuals can also experience it. Ageism can manifest as institutional ageism through discriminatory policies, interpersonal ageism in social interactions, and internalised ageism where individuals adopt ageist beliefs about themselves. It is often rooted in negative stereotypes, such as the belief that older people are frail or incapable. Ageism is considered by some to be the last socially acceptable prejudice. It can negatively impact mental and physical health and may even be associated with earlier death. Efforts to combat ageism include policy changes, education, and intergenerational programs.
Agencies of socialisation are groups or social contexts within which processes of socialisation take place. Socialisation is the lifelong process through which individuals learn the norms, values, beliefs, and behaviours of their society.[25, 26] The family is typically considered the primary agent of socialisation, having the most influence during early childhood, teaching basic social norms, values, language, and behaviour. Secondary agents of socialisation become more influential as individuals mature and include peer groups, schools, the media, religion, government, and the workplace. These agents contribute to learning societal expectations, academic knowledge, social skills, and professional roles. The community and neighborhood also play a role by providing opportunities for social interaction and learning local norms.
Aging Studies is an interdisciplinary field dedicated to the comprehensive examination of the multifaceted process of human aging. This academic domain draws insights from sociology, psychology, biology, public health, economics, and policy studies to understand the physiological, cognitive, emotional, and social changes that occur throughout the life course, particularly in later life. It focuses on the experiences of older adults, the social roles they occupy, the challenges they face (such as ageism, health issues, and retirement), and the societal responses to an increasingly aging population. Researchers in Aging Studies investigate topics like social support networks, elder care systems, generational differences, healthy aging initiatives, and the impact of demographic shifts on social institutions. The field also addresses the social construction of old age and the cultural perceptions of longevity, aiming to promote well-being and equitable policies for all age groups within society. It is crucial for informing public policy and promoting a nuanced understanding of later life.
An agrarian society is the most technologically advanced form of preindustrial society, where members are primarily engaged in the production of food but increase their crop yield through innovations such as the plow. It is any community whose economy is fundamentally based on the production and maintenance of crops and farmland, with agriculture serving as the primary source of wealth. Agrarian societies emerged after hunter-gatherer and horticultural societies, marking a transition to settled agricultural communities around 10,000 years ago. Key characteristics include a predominantly rural population, social hierarchies often based on land ownership, the use of agricultural technologies, and cultural practices tied to agricultural cycles. The surplus of food enabled population growth and the development of more complex social structures, including specialised occupations and trade.
Alienation is the condition of being estranged or disassociated from the surrounding society. It involves a feeling of separation from one's milieu, work, the products of work, or self. The sense that our own abilities, as human beings, are taken over by other entities is also a key aspect. Sociologists like Marx described alienation in capitalist labor, where workers feel disconnected from their labor and its products. Durkheim focused on anomie, a state of normlessness leading to social alienation. Common variations of alienation include powerlessness, meaninglessness, normlessness, cultural estrangement, social isolation, and self-estrangement. Alienation is a recurring theme in sociological analysis of modern life and is often depicted in literature and popular culture as psychological isolation.
Alternative_And_Nontraditional_Family_Form encompasses family structures that diverge from conventional nuclear or extended family models, representing the diversity and adaptability of family organisation in contemporary society. These aggregates reflect changing social norms, economic pressures, and cultural values that have expanded definitions of what constitutes a family beyond traditional biological and legal ties. They demonstrate how individuals create meaningful kinship networks and family-like relationships based on emotional bonds, mutual support, and shared commitment rather than solely on biological connection or legal recognition. These family forms often emerge in response to social marginalisation, economic necessity, or personal choice, highlighting the resilience and creativity of human social organisation in meeting fundamental needs for belonging, support, and care.
Amalgamation is the process by which a majority group and a minority group combine through intermarriage to form a new group. This process, also known as miscegenation, involves biological and cultural merging, often leading to a new, unified group identity. The concept of a "melting pot" is often used to describe amalgamation, where different cultures blend to create an entirely new culture, unlike assimilation where one group adopts the dominant culture, or pluralism where groups coexist while retaining their distinct identities. Cultural amalgamation involves a mutual appreciation and integration of social norms, traditions, and both material and nonmaterial aspects of each contributing culture. Historically, laws against miscegenation existed, highlighting societal resistance to this process.
Animism is the belief that events in the world are mobilised by the activities of spirits, suggesting that inanimate objects, natural phenomena, and even abstract concepts possess a soul or spiritual essence. This belief system often involves the idea that spirits inhabit the natural world and influence human affairs. In animistic worldviews, spirits are not necessarily seen as supernatural beings separate from the material world but rather as integral parts of it. These spirits can be benevolent, malevolent, or neutral, and they may require appeasement or interaction through rituals and offerings. Animism is a broad category encompassing diverse beliefs and practices found in many indigenous cultures around the world. It often forms the basis of traditional religions and can influence various aspects of life, including social customs, moral codes, and explanations of natural events. The concept of animism was notably explored by early anthropologists like Sir Edward Tylor, who considered it to be the earliest form of religious belief.
Anomie is a sociological concept, primarily associated with Emile Durkheim, that describes a state of normlessness or social disorganisation within a society or a social group. It occurs when there is a breakdown or absence of clear moral guidelines, social norms, and shared values, leading to a sense of confusion, disorientation, and lack of social regulation among individuals. Durkheim argued that rapid social change, such as industrialisation or economic crises, can disrupt traditional social bonds and norms, thereby contributing to anomie. When individuals experience anomie, they may feel disconnected from society, lack a sense of purpose, and be unsure of what behaviours are expected or appropriate. This state can lead to various negative consequences, including increased rates of deviance, crime, despair, and suicide, as individuals struggle to find meaning and direction in a deregulated social environment. Robert Merton later expanded on the concept, applying it to the strain individuals feel when culturally prescribed goals are not attainable through legitimate means.
The anomie theory of deviance, developed by Robert Merton, explains deviance as an adaptation either of socially prescribed goals or of the norms governing their attainment, or both. This theory posits that societal norms and values can create strain or anomie when individuals are unable to achieve culturally valued goals through legitimate means. Merton identified five modes of adaptation to this strain: conformity, innovation, ritualism, retreatism, and rebellion. Conformity involves accepting both the goals and the means to achieve them. Innovation involves accepting the goals but rejecting the legitimate means, often resorting to deviant behaviour to achieve success. Ritualism occurs when individuals abandon the pursuit of societal goals but rigidly adhere to the established norms. Retreatism involves rejecting both the goals and the means, often leading to social withdrawal. Rebellion involves rejecting the existing goals and means and attempting to replace them with new ones. Merton's theory highlights how social structures can unintentionally lead to deviance by creating a disconnect between cultural goals and the available means to achieve them.
Antisemitism or Jew-hatred is hostility to, prejudice towards, or discrimination against Jews. A person who harbours it is called an antisemite. Whether antisemitism is considered a form of racism depends on the school of thought. Antisemitic tendencies may be motivated primarily by negative sentiment towards Jews as a people or negative sentiment towards Jews with regard to Judaism. In the former case, usually known as racial antisemitism, a person's hostility is driven by the belief that Jews constitute a distinct race with inherent traits or characteristics that are repulsive or inferior to the preferred traits or characteristics within that person's society. In the latter case, known as religious antisemitism, a person's hostility is driven by their religion's perception of Jews and Judaism, typically encompassing doctrines of supersession that expect or demand Jews to turn away from Judaism and submit to the religion presenting itself as Judaism's successor faith—this is a common theme within the other Abrahamic religions.
Anticipatory socialisation refers to the processes of socialisation in which a person "rehearses" for future positions, occupations, and social relationships. This involves learning the norms, values, and behaviours associated with a status or role that the individual expects to occupy in the future. By engaging in anticipatory socialisation, individuals can prepare themselves for the challenges and expectations of new roles, making the transition smoother when they eventually occupy those positions. Examples include teenagers who start dressing or behaving in ways they associate with adulthood, or students who take on internships to learn about a future profession. This process can help individuals develop the necessary skills and understanding to navigate new social environments and fulfill the requirements of future roles effectively. It plays a crucial role in facilitating social mobility and adaptation to changing life circumstances.
Apartheid was the former policy of the South African government designed to maintain the separation of Blacks and other non-Whites from the dominant Whites. This system of racial segregation and discrimination was implemented through legislation that classified people into racial groups and enforced their separation in all aspects of life, including housing, education, employment, healthcare, and political participation. The apartheid regime systematically privileged the White minority and subjected the Black majority to severe oppression and denial of basic human rights. This policy was in effect from 1948 to 1994 and drew widespread international condemnation, leading to various sanctions and boycotts against South Africa. The dismantling of apartheid began in the early 1990s with the release of Nelson Mandela and the subsequent reforms that led to multiracial elections and the establishment of a democratic government in South Africa. The legacy of apartheid continues to impact South African society, with ongoing efforts to address the deep-seated inequalities and social divisions created by this discriminatory system.
Applied_And_Institutional_Study encompasses sociological domains that examine major social institutions and organised collective activities that structure contemporary social life. These fields analyse how formal and informal institutions shape social behaviour, distribute resources and power, and respond to social challenges and changes. The domain emphasises the intersection between institutional structures and social action, examining how organisations, movements, and institutional arrangements both constrain and enable human agency. These studies contribute to understanding how societies organise themselves around fundamental challenges such as governance, health, communication, environmental sustainability, and social change. They bridge academic sociology with practical applications, often informing policy development and institutional reform. The domain recognises that modern societies are characterised by complex institutional arrangements that require specialised analytical attention. These fields collectively examine how institutions mediate between individual experience and broader social structures, analysing the dynamics of institutional change, the relationship between formal and informal institutional arrangements, and the ways institutions both reproduce and transform social relationships and power structures in contemporary societies.
Applied social research is research which aims not just to understand a social problem, but also to make a contribution to solving it. Unlike basic research, which focuses on expanding fundamental knowledge, applied research is directed towards addressing specific real-world issues and informing practical solutions. Much criminological research, for example, is applied research, aiming to reduce levels of crime through the study of its causes and effective interventions. Applied social research is a feature of all social science disciplines and often demands the involvement of multi-disciplinary teams to tackle complex social problems effectively. This type of research can involve evaluating the effectiveness of social programs, developing new interventions, or informing policy decisions to improve social outcomes. The findings from applied research are intended to have practical implications and contribute to positive social change.
Argot refers to the specialised language used by members of a group or subculture. This jargon or slang serves to distinguish members of the group from outsiders and can reinforce group identity and cohesion. Argot often includes unique vocabulary, expressions, and meanings that are understood by those within the group but may be incomprehensible to others. It can develop in various social contexts, such as among occupational groups, criminal subcultures, hobbyist communities, or even within specific age groups. The use of argot can facilitate communication among group members, create a sense of exclusivity, and signal belonging. It can also evolve over time as the group's activities, interests, and social dynamics change. Studying argot can provide insights into the values, norms, and social structure of a particular group or subculture.
Ascribed status is a social position "assigned" to a person by society without regard for the person's unique talents or characteristics. It is a status that is beyond an individual's control, often based on factors such as race, ethnicity, sex, age, family background, or birth order. Unlike achieved status, which is earned through personal effort, ascribed status is something an individual is born with or involuntarily acquires. While ascribed statuses may not directly reflect an individual's abilities or efforts, they can significantly influence their opportunities and social interactions within a society. For example, in many societies, gender and race are ascribed statuses that can lead to differential treatment and expectations. The relative importance of ascribed versus achieved status varies across societies and over time, with modern societies often emphasizing achieved status as a basis for social standing, although ascribed statuses continue to play a significant role in social stratification.
Authority is power that has been institutionalised and is recognised by the people over whom it is exercised. It is a form of legitimate power, meaning that those subject to it accept its rightfulness. Sociologist Max Weber identified three main types of authority: traditional authority, charismatic authority, and rational-legal authority. Traditional authority is based on long-established customs and traditions, often associated with hereditary leadership. Charismatic authority stems from the exceptional personal qualities or appeal of a leader, inspiring devotion and obedience. Rational-legal authority is based on formal rules, laws, and procedures, typically associated with bureaucratic systems and elected officials. The recognition and acceptance of authority are crucial for maintaining social order and stability within a society. When power is perceived as legitimate authority, it is more likely to be obeyed and less likely to be challenged.
Authority_And_Power_Disposition encompasses the fundamental capacities and tendencies through which social actors exercise influence, control, and legitimate dominance within social systems. This class includes the general disposition for exercising will over others (Power), the institutionalised and recognised forms of legitimate power (Authority), and the specific manifestations of legitimate authority based on different sources of legitimacy: traditional customs and hereditary status (Traditional_Authority), exceptional personal appeal and extraordinary qualities (Charismatic_Authority), and formal rules and bureaucratic procedures (Legal-rational_Authority). These dispositions represent the core mechanisms through which social order is maintained, decisions are made, and social hierarchies are established and sustained. The variation within this class reflects different cultural and institutional approaches to organizing legitimate power relations, from personal charisma to bureaucratic rationality to customary tradition.
In the context of Erving Goffman's dramaturgical theory, the back region is an area away from 'front region' performances. It is where individuals can relax their public image, step out of their roles, and behave more spontaneously. The back region is characterised by informality, where performers can prepare for their front stage performances, discuss them with fellow performers, and contradict the impression they present to the audience. This space allows for behaviours that might be considered inappropriate or inconsistent with the front stage persona. The contrast between the front and back regions highlights the conscious effort individuals make to manage impressions in social interactions.
Bilateral descent is a kinship system in which both sides of a person's family are regarded as equally important in determining familial relationships and inheritance. This means that an individual traces their ancestry and kinship ties through both their mother's and father's sides of the family. In societies with bilateral descent, there is no strong emphasis on either the paternal or maternal line; both are considered equally significant. This system is common in many modern Western societies. It contrasts with unilineal descent systems, such as patrilineal descent (where kinship is traced through the father's line) and matrilineal descent (where kinship is traced through the mother's line), where one side of the family is considered more important than the other. Bilateral descent often leads to a wider network of recognised relatives compared to unilineal systems.
Bilingualism refers to the use of two or more languages in particular settings, such as workplaces or educational facilities, treating each language as equally legitimate. It can also refer to an individual's ability to speak and understand two or more languages fluently. In a broader sense, multilingualism encompasses the use of more than two languages. Bilingualism can have significant social, cultural, and cognitive benefits, fostering communication and understanding between different linguistic groups. In societies with diverse populations, bilingualism in institutions can promote inclusivity and equal access to services and opportunities. The recognition of multiple languages as equally legitimate acknowledges the value and importance of linguistic diversity.
Biographical methods involve research techniques that focus on collecting and analysing data related to individual lives or life experiences. These methods often include oral histories, where individuals recount their life stories in interviews; life stories, which are narrative accounts of a person's life, either told by themselves or others; autobiographies, which are self-written accounts of one's own life; and biographies, which are accounts of someone's life written by another person. Biographical methods aim to understand social phenomena from the perspective of individuals and to explore the meanings they attach to their experiences. They are particularly useful for studying life course transitions, personal narratives, and the impact of social and historical contexts on individual lives.
Biographical research is a qualitative research approach that takes individual lives or life histories as its main focus of interest. It seeks to understand the social world through the detailed examination of personal experiences and the stories people tell about their lives. This type of research often involves in-depth interviews, analysis of personal documents (such as letters or diaries), and sometimes ethnographic observations to gain a rich and holistic understanding of the individual's life within their social context. Biographical research can provide valuable insights into social processes, cultural norms, and the ways individuals shape and are shaped by their social environments. It is used in various social science disciplines, including sociology, psychology, and anthropology, to explore topics such as identity formation, social change, and the impact of historical events on personal lives.
Birthrate, also known as the crude birthrate, is the number of live births per 1,000 population in a given year. It is a basic measure of fertility in a population. The birthrate is influenced by various social, economic, and cultural factors, including the age and sex structure of the population, the average age at which people have children, the availability of contraception, cultural norms around family size, and economic conditions. A high birthrate can contribute to population growth, while a low birthrate may lead to population decline if not offset by immigration. Birthrates vary significantly across different countries and regions, reflecting diverse social and developmental contexts.
Bisexual describes an orientation of sexual activities or feelings towards other people of either sex (both men and women). It is one of the main categories of sexual orientation, alongside heterosexual (attraction to the opposite sex) and homosexual (attraction to the same sex). Bisexuality is characterised by attraction to more than one gender, although the degree and nature of attraction can vary among individuals who identify as bisexual. It is important to recognise bisexuality as a distinct and valid sexual orientation, not merely a transitional phase or an equal attraction to both sexes. The understanding and acceptance of bisexuality have evolved over time, and it continues to be a topic of discussion and increasing visibility in contemporary society.
Black power is a political philosophy promoted by many younger Blacks in the 1960s that supported the creation of Black-controlled political and economic institutions. This movement emerged during the Civil Rights era, advocating for self-determination, racial pride, and the development of Black political and economic power to achieve equality and liberation. It represented a shift from earlier strategies of nonviolent integration to a more assertive stance emphasizing Black autonomy and the need to address systemic racism and oppression. The Black Power movement encompassed a range of ideologies and goals, including Black nationalism, Black separatism, and Black self-reliance. It led to the formation of various organisations and initiatives aimed at empowering Black communities and challenging racial inequality in the United States. The legacy of the Black Power movement continues to influence discussions about race, identity, and social justice today.
Bourgeoisie, in the theory of Karl Marx, refers to the capitalist class, comprising the owners of the means of production, such as factories, land, and capital. In capitalist society, the bourgeoisie stands in opposition to the proletariat, or working class, who do not own the means of production and must sell their labor power to the bourgeoisie in order to survive.[1, 2] According to Marx, the bourgeoisie's primary goal is the accumulation of capital and profit, which they achieve through the exploitation of the proletariat. This class structure and the inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat are central to Marx's critique of capitalism.
Bureaucracy is an organisation of a hierarchical sort, which takes the form of a pyramid of authority, with clear lines of command and responsibility. The term 'bureaucracy' was popularised by Max Weber, who considered it the most efficient type of large-scale human organisation in modern society. According to Weber, bureaucracy is characterised by a division of labor, a clearly defined hierarchy, formal rules and regulations, impersonality, and a focus on technical competence. As organisations grow in size and complexity, Weber argued, they inevitably tend to become more and more bureaucratised to manage their operations effectively.
Bureaucratisation is the process by which a group, organisation, or social movement becomes increasingly bureaucratic in its structure and operation. This involves the adoption of the characteristics of a bureaucracy, such as hierarchical organisation, formal rules and procedures, specialisation of tasks, and impersonal relationships. Bureaucratisation often occurs as organisations grow and seek greater efficiency and standardisation in their activities. While it can lead to increased efficiency, it can also result in rigidity, red tape, and a decrease in flexibility and personal initiative.
Capital punishment is the state-sanctioned execution of a person who has been convicted of a crime that is punishable by death. Commonly known as the 'death penalty', it is a highly debated topic with strong ethical, moral, and legal arguments both for and against its use. Proponents often argue for its effectiveness as a deterrent to crime and as a just retribution for heinous offenses, while opponents raise concerns about its irreversibility, potential for error, and moral implications, often citing issues of human rights and cruel and unusual punishment. The application of capital punishment varies significantly across countries and jurisdictions, with differing views on which crimes warrant such a severe penalty.
Capitalism is a system of economic enterprise based on market exchange, private ownership of the means of production, and the pursuit of profit. 'Capital' refers to any asset, including money, property, and machines, which can be used to produce commodities for sale or invested in a market with the hope of achieving a profit. Key features of capitalism include free markets, competition, wage labor, and the accumulation of capital. While it can drive innovation and economic growth, capitalism has also been criticised for its potential to create social inequalities and economic instability. Karl Marx argued that capitalism leads to alienation of workers from their labor and the products they produce.
Capitalist are those who own companies, land, or stocks and shares, using these assets to generate economic returns or profits through investment and production. In a capitalist system, capitalists control the means of production and employ workers to produce goods and services, aiming to maximise their profits. They play a central role in the economy by investing capital and taking risks in the pursuit of economic growth. The relationship between capitalists and workers is often characterised by an imbalance of power, as capitalists own the resources necessary for production and workers depend on them for employment and wages.
Causal logic refers to the relationship between a condition or variable and a particular consequence, with one event or factor leading to the other in a predictable way. It involves understanding the mechanisms through which a cause produces its effect. Establishing causal logic in social research requires demonstrating correlation, temporal order (the cause precedes the effect), and the absence of spurious relationships (where a third variable might be responsible for the observed association). Identifying causal relationships is a key goal of sociological analysis, as it allows for explanations of social phenomena and the development of effective interventions to address social problems.
Causation refers to the causal influence of one factor on another, where a change in one variable directly produces a change in another. Causal factors in sociology include the reasons individuals give for what they do, as well as external influences on their behaviour, such as social structures, cultural norms, and economic conditions. Establishing causation in sociological research is often challenging due to the complexity of social phenomena and the difficulty of isolating specific causes. Researchers use various methods, including experiments, surveys, and statistical analysis, to try to identify and understand causal relationships between social variables. Understanding causation is crucial for developing sociological theories and for informing social policies aimed at creating positive social change.
A census is an enumeration, or counting, of a population, typically conducted by a government at regular intervals. It aims to gather comprehensive demographic, social, and economic data about all individuals residing within a country or region at a specific point in time. The information collected in a census can include age, sex, race, ethnicity, education level, occupation, income, and household characteristics. This data is crucial for various purposes, such as allocating government resources, determining political representation, and informing policy decisions. The methodology of a census can vary, but it often involves distributing questionnaires to households or conducting door-to-door surveys. Ensuring accuracy and completeness in a census can be challenging due to factors like population mobility and reluctance to participate. Modern censuses often utilise technology to improve data collection and processing.
Charismatic authority, as defined by Max Weber, is a type of power made legitimate by a leader's exceptional personal or emotional appeal to their followers. This authority rests on the extraordinary qualities or perceived heroism of an individual, which inspire devotion, trust, and obedience in their followers. Unlike traditional authority, which is based on established customs, or rational-legal authority, which is based on rules and laws, charismatic authority is highly personal and often emerges during times of social upheaval or crisis. Leaders with charismatic authority may possess exceptional speaking abilities, a compelling vision, or a perceived connection to a higher power. However, charismatic authority can be unstable and often depends on the continued belief and support of the followers in the leader's unique qualities. It typically needs to be routinised into either traditional or rational-legal authority to ensure its long-term stability and continuity after the charismatic leader is gone.
A church is a large body of people belonging to an established religious organisation. Churches normally have a formal structure, with a hierarchy of religious officials, and the term is also used for the building where their religious ceremonials are held. Churches tend to be well-integrated into the broader society and often have a significant influence on social norms and values. They typically have a long history and established doctrines and practices. In sociological terms, a church is often contrasted with other types of religious organisations, such as sects and cults, which tend to be smaller, less formally organised, and may have more unconventional beliefs or practices. Churches often play a role in providing social services, education, and community support to their members.
In sociology, the term 'class' is used by Max Weber to refer to a group of people who have a similar level of wealth and income. Weber's concept of class also includes factors such as occupation and market situation, reflecting an individual's economic opportunities and life chances. While Marx focused primarily on the ownership of the means of production as the basis of class, Weber provided a more multidimensional view, distinguishing between class (economic position), status (social prestige or honor), and power (political influence). According to Weber, these three dimensions of social stratification can intersect and influence an individual's overall position in society. The study of class remains a central topic in sociology, with researchers examining its impact on various aspects of social life, including health, education, and political behaviour.
In Karl Marx's view, class consciousness is a subjective awareness held by members of a class regarding their common vested interests and need for collective political action to bring about social change. Marx argued that for the proletariat (working class) to overcome their exploitation by the bourgeoisie (capitalist class), they needed to develop an understanding of their shared economic situation and their common interests in challenging the capitalist system. This awareness would then lead to collective action, such as organizing into labor unions and engaging in political struggle, to ultimately transform society and establish a communist system where the means of production are collectively owned. The development of class consciousness is a crucial step in Marx's theory of social change.
A class system is a form of social ranking based primarily on economic position in which achieved characteristics can influence mobility. Unlike caste systems, where social position is ascribed at birth and cannot be changed, class systems allow for social mobility, the movement of individuals or groups up or down the social hierarchy, based on factors such as education, occupation, and income (achieved characteristics). While economic factors are central to class systems, social status and power also play a role. Class systems are characteristic of modern industrial societies and are considered more open than caste systems, although the extent of social mobility can vary significantly. Sociologists often study class systems to understand patterns of inequality and the factors that influence social mobility.
A coalition is a temporary or permanent alliance geared toward a common goal, often formed by individuals or groups who may have different interests or goals in other areas but come together to achieve a specific shared objective. Coalitions can be found in various social contexts, including politics, business, and social movements. They are often formed to increase the collective power and influence of the participating members in order to achieve a goal that might be difficult or impossible to achieve individually. The stability and effectiveness of a coalition can depend on factors such as the clarity of the common goal, the commitment of the members, and the distribution of power within the alliance. Coalitions can be fluid and may dissolve once the shared goal is achieved or if internal conflicts arise.
Jean Piaget's cognitive theory of development explains how children's thought progresses through four distinct stages, each characterised by different ways of understanding and interacting with the world. The first stage, the sensorimotor stage (birth to about 2 years), involves learning through senses and motor actions. The preoperational stage (about 2 to 7 years) is marked by the development of symbolic thought and language but also by egocentrism and a lack of logical reasoning. The concrete operational stage (about 7 to 11 years) sees the development of logical thinking about concrete events and objects, including the understanding of conservation. Finally, the formal operational stage (from about 12 years and into adulthood) involves the ability to think abstractly and hypothetically. Piaget's theory emphasises that cognitive development is a continuous process of adaptation through assimilation (incorporating new information into existing schemas) and accommodation (modifying existing schemas to fit new information).
Cohabitation is the practice of living together as a male-female couple in an intimate relationship without being legally married. This living arrangement has become increasingly common in many Western societies since the late 20th century. Cohabitation can occur for various reasons, including as a precursor to marriage, as an alternative to marriage, or as a trial period for a relationship. The legal rights and responsibilities of cohabiting couples are generally different from those of married couples, although some jurisdictions have laws in place to protect the rights of cohabiting partners, particularly after a certain period of time. The social acceptance of cohabitation has also grown significantly, and it is no longer viewed as negatively as it once was in many cultures.
Collective behaviour encompasses activities of people and social groups that typically emerge spontaneously (such as crowds, riots, and so on) rather than arising from established processes of socialisation leading to conformity to social rules and norms. These behaviours often occur in response to a shared situation or stimulus and can involve large numbers of people acting in relatively unstructured ways. Examples of collective behaviour include panics, fads, rumors, social movements, and disasters. Sociologists study collective behaviour to understand the dynamics of group actions that are not governed by typical social structures or institutions. Factors such as anonymity, suggestibility, and the rapid spread of information can play a significant role in shaping collective behaviour.
Collective_Causal_Event represents complex social phenomena that emerge from the coordinated interaction of multiple social entities, processes, and conditions acting together to produce significant sociological outcomes. These events transcend simple binary relationships by capturing the multidimensional causal networks inherent in social reality, where individual actors, institutional structures, cultural forces, and historical contexts converge to generate observable social changes. Unlike atomic social events, collective causal events embody the systemic nature of social causation, where emergent properties arise from the dynamic interplay between diverse social elements. This class provides the ontological foundation for modelling complex sociological relationships that require multiple participants, conditions, and causal pathways to adequately represent their full explanatory scope, enabling more nuanced analysis of how social transformation occurs through interconnected webs of influence rather than isolated causal chains.
Colonialism is the maintenance of political, social, economic, and cultural dominance over a people by a foreign power for an extended period of time. This often involves the establishment of settlements and the exploitation of resources in the colonised territory for the benefit of the colonizing power. Colonialism has had a profound and lasting impact on the political, economic, and social structures of many regions around the world, leading to significant cultural changes and often resulting in inequalities and conflicts that persist even after the end of colonial rule. The motivations for colonialism have varied throughout history, including economic gain, political power, strategic advantage, and the spread of religious or cultural beliefs. The study of colonialism examines its historical roots, its various forms and impacts, and its enduring legacies in the contemporary world.
As an ideal type, communism is an economic system under which all property is communally owned, and no social distinctions are made based on people's ability to produce. In its theoretical form, as envisioned by Karl Marx, communism represents a stateless, classless society where resources are distributed based on need ("from each according to his ability, to each according to his need"). Private property is abolished, and the means of production are owned by the community as a whole. While various political movements and states have identified as communist, the ideal type of a fully communist society has never been fully realised in practice. These attempts have often involved authoritarian rule and state control over the economy and social life.
Comparative research is a research methodology that compares one set of findings on one society with the same type of findings on other societies. This approach allows sociologists to identify similarities and differences across different social contexts, providing insights into the generalizability of findings and the influence of specific cultural or institutional factors. By examining social phenomena in multiple settings, comparative research can help to develop broader sociological theories and understand the diversity of human social behaviour. It can involve comparing different countries, regions within a country, or different groups within a society. Methodological rigor is crucial in comparative research to ensure that the comparisons are valid and meaningful, taking into account potential cultural and contextual differences in the meaning and measurement of social variables.
Comprehensive_Economic_System_Model encompasses complete economic systems and ideologies that provide holistic frameworks for organizing production, distribution, and consumption within society. These realizable entities represent distinct approaches to economic organisation that can be instantiated across entire societies or major sectors of societies. They include both market-based systems that emphasise private ownership and competition, and collective systems that prioritise public ownership and social planning. These models differ fundamentally in their approach to property rights, resource allocation, and the role of government in economic affairs. Each system embodies particular values about equality, efficiency, individual freedom, and collective welfare. Understanding these comprehensive models is essential for analysing different approaches to economic organisation and their implications for social structure, inequality, and human welfare.
The concentric-zone theory is a theory of urban growth that sees growth in terms of a series of rings radiating from the central business district. Developed by Ernest Burgess in the 1920s, this model suggests that cities expand outward from a central point in a pattern of concentric zones, each with distinct social and economic characteristics. The innermost zone is typically the central business district, followed by a zone of transition characterised by mixed residential and commercial uses and often experiencing social problems. Subsequent zones include working-class housing, middle-class residential areas, and finally, the commuter zone in the outer suburbs. While this model has been influential, it has also been criticised for its oversimplification of urban patterns and its limited applicability to cities outside of the early 20th-century American context.
The conflict perspective is a major sociological approach that assumes that social behaviour is best understood in terms of conflict or tension between competing groups over scarce resources. Unlike the functionalist perspective, which emphasises social harmony and stability, the conflict perspective highlights power struggles, inequality, and social change as inherent features of society. Key theorists associated with the conflict perspective include Karl Marx, who focused on class conflict, and Max Weber, who considered conflict arising from differences in class, status, and power. Contemporary conflict theorists examine various sources of social conflict, including those based on race, ethnicity, gender, age, and other forms of social inequality. This perspective views social institutions and social order as often reflecting the interests of the dominant groups in society.
Conflict theories represent a sociological perspective that focuses on the inherent tensions, divisions, and competing interests present in human societies. Unlike functionalist perspectives that emphasise social harmony, conflict theorists believe that the scarcity and value of resources in society inevitably produce conflict as different groups struggle to gain access to and control those resources. These resources can include wealth, power, status, and opportunities. Many conflict theorists have been strongly influenced by the writings of Karl Marx, who emphasised class conflict as the primary driver of social change. However, contemporary conflict theories also examine other sources of conflict, such as those based on race, ethnicity, gender, age, and sexual orientation. This perspective views social order as often maintained by the dominance of certain groups over others, with dominant groups using their power to protect their interests and maintain the existing social hierarchy. Social change, from this viewpoint, often occurs through the struggles and conflicts between these competing groups as they challenge existing power structures.
A consumer society is a type of society that promotes the consumption of mass-produced products as a central aspect of social life and individual identity. These societies are characterised by a high level of material consumption and a culture that values the acquisition of goods and services. Consumer societies also generate an ideology of consumerism, which assumes that ever-increasing mass consumption is beneficial for both individuals and the economy. This ideology often links personal happiness and success to the accumulation of material possessions. Consumer culture is heavily influenced by advertising and marketing, which constantly create new desires and needs. While consumer societies can lead to economic growth and innovation, they have also been criticised for their potential negative impacts on the environment, social inequality, and individual well-being due to the emphasis on materialism over other values.
The contact hypothesis is an interactionist perspective that states that interracial contact between people of equal status in cooperative circumstances will reduce prejudice. This theory suggests that increased interaction under the right conditions can lead to greater understanding, empathy, and a reduction in negative stereotypes and biases between groups. For contact to be effective in reducing prejudice, several conditions are typically considered important: equal status of the groups in the contact situation, common goals that require intergroup cooperation, intergroup cooperation and interdependence, and the support of authorities or social norms for intergroup contact. When these conditions are met, intergroup contact can challenge existing stereotypes, increase awareness of similarities between groups, and foster positive attitudes, ultimately leading to a decrease in prejudice.
Content analysis is a systematic coding and objective recording of data, guided by some rationale, to identify patterns and themes within communication. This research method is used to analyse the content of various forms of communication, such as texts, images, audio, and video. The process involves developing a coding scheme to categorise the content based on specific variables or themes of interest to the researcher. The data is then systematically analysed to quantify the frequency and relationships between these categories. Content analysis can be used to study a wide range of topics, including media representations, political discourse, cultural trends, and social interactions. Its strength lies in its ability to provide a quantitative and objective analysis of qualitative data, allowing researchers to draw conclusions based on empirical evidence.
In an experiment, the control group consists of subjects who are not introduced to the independent variable by the researcher. This group serves as a baseline for comparison to the experimental group, which does receive the independent variable. By comparing the outcomes of the control group with those of the experimental group, researchers can determine the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable. The control group helps to isolate the impact of the intervention or treatment being studied by accounting for other factors that might influence the results. Random assignment of subjects to the control and experimental groups is crucial for ensuring that the groups are as similar as possible at the beginning of the experiment, thereby increasing the validity of the findings.
Control theory is a view of conformity and deviance that suggests that our connection to members of society leads us to systematically conform to society's norms. This theory, notably developed by Travis Hirschi, posits that individuals are less likely to engage in deviant behaviour when they have strong social bonds. Hirschi identified four elements of social bonds: attachment (strong relationships with others), commitment (investment in conventional activities), involvement (participation in legitimate activities), and belief (acceptance of societal norms and values). According to control theory, these bonds create a stake in conformity, making individuals more likely to adhere to social norms and less likely to engage in deviance because they fear losing these connections and investments. Weak or broken social bonds, on the other hand, can increase the likelihood of deviance.
A control variable is a factor held constant by a researcher to test the relative impact of an independent variable on a dependent variable. By keeping the control variable the same across different conditions or groups in a study, researchers can better isolate the effect of the independent variable they are interested in. This helps to rule out the possibility that changes in the dependent variable are due to the control variable rather than the independent variable. Using control variables is a key aspect of experimental and quantitative research designs aimed at establishing causal relationships between variables. For example, in a study examining the effect of a new teaching method (independent variable) on student test scores (dependent variable), researchers might control for students' prior academic performance (control variable) to ensure that any observed changes in test scores are indeed due to the new teaching method and not pre-existing differences in academic ability.
A convenience sample is the arbitrary selection of respondents for a study, based on simple opportunity rather than a rigorous quest for representativeness of the larger population. This non-probability sampling method involves choosing participants who are easily accessible to the researcher, such as students in a classroom or people walking by on the street. While convenience samples are easy and cost-effective to obtain, they are often not representative of the broader population, which limits the generalizability of the research findings. Despite this limitation, convenience samples are frequently used in much applied social research with practical applications, where the primary goal is to gather preliminary data or explore specific issues rather than to make broad generalisations. They can also be useful for pilot studies or when time and resources are limited.
According to world-systems theory, core countries are the most advanced industrial countries, which take the lion's share of profits in the world economic system. These nations possess high levels of industrialisation, technological innovation, and economic diversification. They typically have strong state institutions, well-developed infrastructure, and a highly skilled workforce. Core countries dominate global trade and finance, often exploiting peripheral and semi-peripheral countries for raw materials and cheap labor. Examples of core countries include the United States, Japan, and Germany. This dominance allows core countries to maintain their economic and political power in the global arena, perpetuating a system of unequal exchange. World-systems theory, developed by Immanuel Wallerstein, emphasises the interconnectedness of the global economy and the hierarchical relationship between core, semi-peripheral, and peripheral nations.
Core_Socialisation_And_Learning_Process encompasses the fundamental mechanisms through which individuals acquire cultural knowledge, develop social identities, and learn to function as competent members of society. These processes represent the essential pathways by which social norms, values, beliefs, and behaviours are transmitted from society to individuals and internalised as part of personal identity. The overarching process of socialisation provides the general framework for cultural transmission, while primary and secondary socialisation represent distinct phases with different agents, contexts, and developmental outcomes. Political socialisation represents a specialised domain focusing on civic and political learning. Education serves as both a formal agent of socialisation and a structured process for knowledge transmission. These processes collectively ensure cultural continuity across generations while enabling individual adaptation to social environments. They demonstrate how societies reproduce themselves through systematic processes of cultural learning and identity formation that begin in early childhood and continue throughout the life course.
Cornucopian Theory is an optimistic viewpoint regarding population growth and resource availability, asserting that technological advancements and human ingenuity will always find ways to overcome resource scarcity and environmental limits. Proponents of this theory believe that as resources become scarcer, human innovation will be stimulated to develop new technologies, discover alternative resources, or improve efficiency, thereby expanding the available supply and preventing catastrophic outcomes often predicted by Malthusian perspectives. They argue that market mechanisms, driven by rising prices of scarce resources, will incentivise innovation and substitution, ensuring continuous progress and an ever-increasing capacity for the Earth to support a growing population. This theory often emphasises the role of free markets, technological innovation, and human adaptability as key solutions to environmental and resource challenges, maintaining that humanity's creativity is an unlimited resource that can always provide for its needs, thus rejecting a pessimistic outlook on the planet's carrying capacity.
Corporate crime refers to offences committed by large corporations in society in the pursuit of profit or to avoid losses. These crimes are often non-violent but can have significant social, environmental, and economic consequences. Examples of corporate crime include pollution of air and water, false advertising and deceptive marketing practices, violations of health and safety regulations in the workplace, financial fraud, and the production and sale of unsafe products. Unlike street crime, corporate crime is often more complex and difficult to detect and prosecute, as it may involve intricate financial transactions and decision-making processes within large organisations. The impact of corporate crime can be widespread, affecting consumers, employees, the environment, and the public trust in corporations and regulatory agencies.
Corporate culture is a branch of management theory that seeks to increase productivity and competitiveness through the creation of a unique organisational culture involving all members of a firm. It encompasses the shared values, beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours that characterise an organisation and influence how work is done. A dynamic corporate culture, often involving company events, rituals, and traditions, is thought to enhance employee loyalty, promote group solidarity, and foster a sense of shared identity and purpose among employees. A strong and positive corporate culture can contribute to improved communication, collaboration, innovation, and overall organisational performance. It can also play a role in attracting and retaining talented employees who align with the company's values and mission.
Correlation refers to a regular relationship or association between two dimensions or variables, often expressed in statistical terms. Correlations can be positive or negative. A positive correlation between two variables exists where a high rank or value on one variable is regularly associated with a high rank or value on the other. For example, there is often a positive correlation between years of education and income level. A negative correlation exists where a high rank or value on one variable is regularly associated with a low rank or value on the other. For instance, there might be a negative correlation between the price of a product and the quantity demanded. It is important to note that correlation does not necessarily imply causation; a correlation between two variables may be due to a third, unmeasured variable, or it may simply be a coincidental relationship.
A correlation coefficient is a statistical measure of the degree of correlation between two variables, indicating the strength and direction of their linear relationship. The value of a correlation coefficient typically ranges from -1.0 to +1.0. A coefficient of +1.0 indicates a perfect positive correlation, meaning that as one variable increases, the other variable increases proportionally. A coefficient of -1.0 indicates a perfect negative correlation, meaning that as one variable increases, the other variable decreases proportionally. A coefficient of 0 indicates no linear correlation between the two variables. The closer the coefficient is to +1.0 or -1.0, the stronger the correlation; the closer it is to 0, the weaker the correlation. Correlation does not imply causation, meaning that just because two variables are correlated does not necessarily mean that one causes the other.
A counterculture is a subculture that deliberately opposes certain aspects of the larger culture, often challenging its dominant norms, values, beliefs, and practices. Countercultures typically emerge as a reaction against mainstream culture and may advocate for alternative lifestyles, social structures, or political systems. Examples of countercultures throughout history include the hippie movement of the 1960s, which rejected mainstream consumerism and traditional values, and various punk subcultures that expressed rebellion through music, fashion, and attitudes. Countercultures can play a significant role in social change by questioning established norms and pushing the boundaries of cultural expression. While some aspects of a counterculture may eventually be absorbed into the mainstream, others may remain as distinct alternatives to the dominant culture.
Creationism is a literal interpretation of the Bible regarding the creation of man and the universe, used to argue that evolution should not be presented as established scientific fact in educational settings. Adherents of creationism often believe that the universe and all living organisms were created in their present forms by a divine creator, as described in the Book of Genesis. This view directly contradicts the scientific theory of evolution, which explains the diversity of life on Earth through natural selection and descent with modification over vast periods of time. The debate between creationism and evolution has been a long-standing source of controversy, particularly in the United States, with ongoing discussions about the appropriate place of each perspective in school curricula. The scientific community overwhelmingly supports the theory of evolution as the best explanation for the origins and development of life.
Crime is a violation of criminal law for which formal penalties are applied by some governmental authority. What constitutes a crime is defined by legal statutes at the local, state, or federal level, and these definitions can vary across jurisdictions and change over time. Crimes are typically classified based on their severity, ranging from minor offenses (misdemeanors) to serious felonies. The criminal justice system, including law enforcement agencies, courts, and correctional institutions, is responsible for enforcing criminal laws, apprehending offenders, and administering penalties, which can include fines, probation, imprisonment, or, in some cases, capital punishment. Sociologists study crime from various perspectives, examining its social causes, patterns, and consequences, as well as the functioning of the criminal justice system and its impact on society.
Criminal_And_Illegal_Activity_Process encompasses systematic patterns of behaviour that violate established legal codes and criminal statutes, representing various forms of organised and individual criminal conduct. These processes involve deliberate actions that transgress legal boundaries and often require coordinated responses from criminal justice systems. The category includes both traditional forms of criminal activity and emerging forms enabled by technological advancement. Crime serves as the general framework for understanding legal violations, while specialised forms like organised crime involve systematic criminal enterprises with hierarchical structures and ongoing operations. Corporate crime represents violations committed by business entities in pursuit of profit, often involving complex regulatory frameworks. Cybercrime demonstrates how technological advancement creates new venues and methods for criminal activity. White-collar crime highlights how criminal processes can occur within legitimate professional contexts. These processes collectively represent challenges to social order and legal authority, requiring sophisticated law enforcement and judicial responses to maintain societal stability and justice.
A crowd is a temporary gathering of people who share a common focus of attention and whose members influence one another. Crowds can vary in size, purpose, and emotional intensity. They can form for various reasons, such as attending a sporting event, a concert, a protest, or in response to an emergency. The behaviour of individuals within a crowd can be influenced by factors such as anonymity, social contagion (the spread of emotions and behaviours through a crowd), and the perceived unity of the group. Sociologists study crowds to understand the dynamics of collective behaviour and how individuals act in group settings, which can sometimes differ significantly from their behaviour when alone. Theories of crowd behaviour have evolved over time, from early ideas about the "mob mentality" to more nuanced understandings of the social processes and interactions that occur within crowds.
The crude birth rate is the number of live births in a given year for every thousand people in a population. It is a fundamental measure in demography, providing a snapshot of the reproductive activity within a population during a specific time period, typically a year. This rate is calculated by taking the total number of live births in a year, dividing it by the total population (usually the mid-year population), and then multiplying the result by 1,000. The crude birth rate is influenced by a variety of social, economic, and cultural factors, including the age and sex structure of the population, levels of education (especially among women), access to contraception and family planning services, cultural norms and religious beliefs about family size, and economic conditions such as levels of development and urbanisation. A high crude birth rate generally indicates a younger population with high fertility levels, while a low crude birth rate may suggest an aging population or lower fertility rates due to factors like increased access to education and contraception, or changing societal norms. It is considered "crude" because it includes all people in the population in the denominator, regardless of their age or sex, and does not specifically account for the number of women of childbearing age, which is a more refined measure of fertility. Nevertheless, the crude birth rate is a widely used and easily understood indicator of population change and is essential for making comparisons across different populations and tracking demographic trends over time.
The crude death rate is the number of deaths in a given year for every thousand people in a population. Similar to the crude birth rate, it is a basic but widely used measure in demography that provides an overview of the mortality level within a population during a specific year. The crude death rate is calculated by dividing the total number of deaths recorded in a year by the total population (usually the mid-year population) and then multiplying the result by 1,000. This rate is influenced by various factors such as the age structure of the population (populations with a higher proportion of older people tend to have higher crude death rates), levels of healthcare and sanitation, prevalence of diseases, nutritional status, environmental conditions, and socioeconomic factors. A high crude death rate can indicate a population with poor health conditions, high levels of poverty, or a large proportion of elderly individuals, while a low crude death rate may suggest better healthcare, sanitation, and a younger population structure. Like the crude birth rate, the crude death rate is considered "crude" because it does not take into account the age and sex composition of the population, which can significantly affect mortality levels. For instance, a population with a large number of young people might have a lower crude death rate even if the mortality rates for specific age groups are relatively high. Despite this limitation, the crude death rate is a valuable tool for comparing mortality levels across different populations and for monitoring changes in mortality trends over time.
Cultural capital, a concept developed by sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, refers to the types of knowledge, skills, education, and other cultural resources that confer advantages on those who acquire them, providing them with social mobility and status within a society. Bourdieu identified three forms of cultural capital: embodied, objectified, and institutionalised. Embodied cultural capital exists in the form of knowledge and skills that are consciously acquired and passively inherited, such as language proficiency, manners, tastes, and dispositions. These are often learned through socialisation within a particular social class or cultural environment. Objectified cultural capital refers to cultural goods such as books, artworks, musical instruments, and other material objects that can be owned and transmitted. However, the possession of these objects is not sufficient; one must also have the cultural competence to understand and appreciate them to fully benefit from this form of capital. Institutionalised cultural capital consists of academic credentials, professional qualifications, and other forms of formal recognition that legitimate an individual's cultural competence and confer social advantages in the labor market and other social institutions. Cultural capital plays a significant role in social reproduction, as individuals from privileged backgrounds often possess more cultural capital, which helps them succeed in educational systems and gain access to higher-status occupations, thereby perpetuating social inequalities across generations.
Cultural Concepts serve as abstract ideas or mental constructs that sociologists and other scholars use to categorize, analyse, and understand the intangible aspects of culture within human societies. As a meta-category, Cultural Concepts encompass fundamental building blocks such as values, which are culturally defined standards of desirability; norms, which are rules and expectations guiding behaviour; and beliefs, which are shared understandings about the nature of reality. They also include broader ideas like symbols, language, cultural capital, and the very notion of culture itself. These concepts provide a shared vocabulary and analytical framework for researchers to dissect and interpret the complex cultural patterns, meanings, and practices that shape social life. By applying these concepts, sociologists can explore how culture is created, maintained, transmitted across generations, and how it influences individual identities, social interactions, and societal structures, enabling a systematic study of diverse cultural phenomena.
Cultural Diversity refers to the variety and richness of different cultures, subcultures, and ethnic groups that coexist within a given society or across the globe. It encompasses the wide array of unique values, norms, beliefs, languages, customs, traditions, social practices, and forms of expression that distinguish these groups from one another. This diversity contributes to the multifaceted nature of human society, reflecting the myriad ways in which people organise their lives, understand the world, and express themselves. Cultural diversity is often celebrated for enriching society by fostering innovation, creativity, a broader range of perspectives, and a more vibrant cultural landscape, thereby enhancing cultural vitality and mutual understanding. However, it can also present challenges related to social cohesion, intergroup relations, and potential conflicts arising from differing values, competing interests, or the historical legacies of power imbalances and discrimination. Sociologists study cultural diversity to understand how different groups maintain their distinct identities while interacting within a larger social framework, and how societies manage diversity to promote inclusion, equality, and social harmony, moving beyond assimilationist models towards valuing cultural pluralism and multiculturalism, and addressing issues like prejudice and segregation.
Cultural Elements are the fundamental components or building blocks that collectively constitute a culture, shaping the way of life for members of a society. These elements can be broadly categorised into two main types: material culture and non-material culture. Material culture comprises the tangible, physical aspects of a culture, such as tools, technology, clothing, food, architecture, and other artifacts that people create and use. Non-material culture, on the other hand, consists of the intangible aspects, including values, norms, beliefs, language, symbols, customs, traditions, and knowledge. Both material and non-material elements are interconnected and mutually influential, reflecting a society's adaptations to its environment, its historical development, and its shared understandings of the world. Understanding these distinct but intertwined cultural elements is crucial for analysing how cultures are structured, how they function, and how they evolve over time, providing a comprehensive view of a society's way of life.
Cultural integration refers to the close relationship and interconnectedness among various elements of a cultural system, such as its norms, values, beliefs, symbols, and practices. In a well-integrated culture, these different components are largely consistent with one another and work together to create a coherent and stable social order. For example, the core values of a society might be reflected in its laws, its educational system, its religious beliefs, and its everyday customs. When cultural integration is high, there is a greater degree of consensus and shared understanding among members of the society regarding how to behave and what is considered important. This can contribute to social cohesion and stability. However, no culture is perfectly integrated, and there can often be tensions and contradictions between different cultural elements, particularly in diverse and rapidly changing societies. The study of cultural integration helps sociologists understand how different parts of a culture fit together and how changes in one area can affect other aspects of the cultural system.
Cultural lag is a concept in sociology that describes the fact that cultural elements change at different rates, which can sometimes disrupt a cultural system and lead to social strain or conflict. This term was popularised by William F. Ogburn, who argued that material culture (such as technology) often changes more rapidly than non-material culture (such as values, beliefs, norms, and laws). When a significant gap develops between these two aspects of culture, it can create a period of maladjustment or social problems as the non-material culture struggles to adapt to the changes in the material culture. For example, the rapid development of the internet and social media has outpaced the development of social norms and laws to govern online behaviour, leading to issues such as cyberbullying, privacy concerns, and the spread of misinformation. Cultural lag highlights the dynamic and sometimes uneven nature of cultural change and the challenges societies face in adapting their values and social structures to new technologies and other material innovations.
Cultural_Organisation_And_Adaptation_Quality encompasses characteristics related to how societies organise their cultural systems, manage cultural change, and adapt to new circumstances. These qualities include aspects of cultural integration, adaptation to cultural differences, and the challenges societies face in managing cultural diversity and change. They represent both the stability of cultural systems and their capacity for adaptation and transformation. These qualities highlight how societies balance cultural continuity with change and how they manage the tensions that arise from cultural diversity, technological advancement, and social transformation.
Cultural pluralism refers to the coexistence of several subcultures within a given society on equal terms, where no single culture dominates and all are recognised and respected for their distinct contributions. In a culturally pluralistic society, different ethnic, racial, religious, and other cultural groups are able to maintain their unique identities, traditions, and practices while participating fully in the broader society. This is often contrasted with assimilation, where minority groups are expected to adopt the culture of the dominant group. Cultural pluralism emphasises the value of diversity and the benefits of having a society enriched by multiple perspectives and traditions. It requires a degree of tolerance and mutual respect among different cultural groups and often involves policies and practices that protect the rights and promote the inclusion of all cultural groups within the society. The concept of a "salad bowl" is often used as a metaphor for cultural pluralism, where different ingredients (cultures) are mixed together but retain their individual flavors and characteristics, rather than being completely blended into a single entity like in a "melting pot" (often used to describe amalgamation).
Cultural relativism is a principle in social science that emphasises the viewing of people's behaviour from the perspective of their own culture, rather than judging it based on the standards of another culture. It suggests that different cultures have different norms, values, beliefs, and practices that are meaningful and functional within their own context. Therefore, to understand and analyse human behaviour, it is essential to consider the cultural framework in which it occurs. Cultural relativism encourages an attitude of openness and understanding towards cultural differences, helping to avoid ethnocentrism, which is the tendency to view one's own culture as superior and to judge other cultures based on one's own cultural norms. While cultural relativism is important for promoting cross-cultural understanding and tolerance, it does not necessarily imply that all cultural practices are equally acceptable or morally justifiable. Sociologists often use cultural relativism as a methodological tool to study and describe different cultures without imposing their own cultural biases.
Cultural reproduction refers to the process by which a society transmits dominant knowledge, values, beliefs, and social inequalities from one generation to another. This transmission occurs through various social institutions, including the family, education system, media, and religion. Cultural reproduction theory, particularly associated with the work of Pierre Bourdieu and Basil Bernstein, highlights how the dominant culture in a society tends to be perpetuated, often reinforcing existing power structures and social hierarchies. For example, the education system may prioritise certain forms of knowledge and cultural capital that are more readily accessible to children from privileged backgrounds, thereby contributing to their continued success and the reproduction of social class differences across generations. Similarly, the media can play a role in shaping and reinforcing dominant ideologies and cultural norms. Understanding cultural reproduction helps sociologists analyse how social inequalities are maintained and transmitted over time, even in the absence of overt discrimination.
Cultural_Systems_And_Concept encompasses the fundamental theoretical frameworks and analytical tools used to understand how culture operates as a system of shared meanings, practices, and organisational principles within society. This class includes both the abstract conceptual apparatus (Cultural_Concept, Culture_Related_Concept) and core cultural phenomena (Culture, Cultural_Element, Cultural_Universal) that constitute the building blocks of cultural analysis. It incorporates principles of cultural interpretation and evaluation (Cultural_Relativism, Cultural_Integration) alongside mechanisms of cultural transmission and change (Sociocultural_Evolution). The class also addresses contemporary manifestations of cultural systems, including specialised organisational cultures (Corporate_Culture) and global cultural connectivity (Global_Village). This grouping represents the comprehensive theoretical and empirical foundation for understanding culture as both an analytical concept and lived social reality.
Cultural transmission is the process by which one generation passes culture to the next, ensuring the continuity of societal norms, values, beliefs, traditions, and practices. This process occurs through various mechanisms, including socialisation within the family, formal education in schools, informal learning from peers and community members, and exposure to media and cultural products. Language is a fundamental tool for cultural transmission, allowing for the communication of knowledge, history, and cultural values across generations. Traditions, rituals, and storytelling also play important roles in passing down cultural heritage. Cultural transmission is essential for the survival and development of societies, as it enables each new generation to learn from the experiences and knowledge of those who came before them, contributing to social stability and cultural evolution. The effectiveness of cultural transmission can influence the rate and direction of cultural change within a society.
Cultural universals are general practices, behaviours, and social institutions that are found in every culture across the globe, despite the vast differences that exist between them. These commonalities suggest fundamental aspects of human life and social organisation that are shared across diverse societies. While the specific forms these universals take can vary greatly from one culture to another, the underlying patterns are consistent. Examples of cultural universals include the presence of language and some form of communication, the existence of family structures (though their forms may differ), systems of social norms and rules governing behaviour, rituals and ceremonies (often related to birth, death, and marriage), some form of art or aesthetic expression (such as music, dance, or visual arts), and mechanisms for dealing with the supernatural or religious beliefs. The study of cultural universals helps sociologists and anthropologists identify core elements of human culture and understand the fundamental ways in which societies organise themselves to meet basic human needs and address common life experiences. The existence of these universals suggests that despite cultural diversity, there are underlying commonalities in human nature and social life.
Culture encompasses the values, beliefs, ceremonies, ways of life, norms, symbols, and material goods characteristic of a given group or society. Like the concept of society, the notion of culture is very widely used in sociology, as well as in other social sciences, particularly anthropology. Culture is one of the most distinctive properties of human social association, differentiating human societies from animal societies in its complexity and transmission through learning rather than solely through instinct. It includes everything that is learned and shared by the members of a society, shaping their behaviour and their understanding of the world. Culture can be broadly divided into material culture, which includes tangible objects created by a society (such as tools, technology, clothing, and art), and nonmaterial culture, which includes intangible aspects such as ideas, values, beliefs, norms, language, and social institutions. Culture provides a framework for social interaction, defines what is considered acceptable and unacceptable behaviour, and gives meaning to people's lives. It is dynamic and constantly evolving through processes of innovation, diffusion, and adaptation.
Culture-Related Concepts serve as a higher-level classification within an ontology for terms that describe specific phenomena, theories, or applications concerning culture that are more abstract or interpretative than basic cultural elements or types of cultural diversity. This category groups concepts that help to analyse how culture operates, changes, or is interpreted within society. Examples include phenomena like cultural lag (the discrepancy between material and non-material culture change), cultural integration (the coherence among cultural elements), cultural reproduction (how culture is transmitted and perpetuated), and culture shock (personal disorientation from unfamiliar ways of life). It also encompasses theoretical frameworks such as cultural relativism and ethnocentrism, which relate to how cultures are viewed and judged. This category provides a structured home for concepts that illuminate the dynamic and complex nature of culture beyond its fundamental components.
Culture shock is the feeling of surprise and disorientation that is experienced when people witness cultural practices, values, norms, and beliefs that are significantly different from their own. This phenomenon typically occurs when individuals are immersed in a new and unfamiliar cultural environment, such as when traveling to a foreign country, moving to a different region within their own country with distinct cultural norms, or even when experiencing a significant change in social environment, like starting a new job with a very different organisational culture. The disorientation arises from the lack of familiar cues and expectations that guide behaviour in one's own culture, leading to feelings of uncertainty, anxiety, and sometimes even hostility towards the new cultural context. Culture shock can affect various aspects of daily life, including communication styles, social etiquette, food, customs, and even basic assumptions about how the world works. While often challenging, experiencing and overcoming culture shock can also lead to personal growth, increased cultural awareness, and a deeper understanding of both one's own culture and others. The process of adapting to a new culture involves learning new norms, values, and behaviours, and gradually adjusting one's own perspectives and practices to fit the new environment.
Cybercrime refers to criminal activities carried out by means of electronic networks, primarily the internet, or involving the use of new information technologies such as computers and mobile devices. These crimes exploit the digital realm to commit offenses that can range from individual acts to large-scale organised operations. Emergent forms of cybercrime include electronic money laundering, which involves concealing the origins of illegally obtained money through digital transactions; personal identity theft, where an individual's personal information is stolen and used for fraudulent purposes; electronic vandalism, which involves damaging or disrupting computer systems or data; and the monitoring of electronic correspondence, such as hacking into email accounts or intercepting online communications. Other common types of cybercrime include phishing scams, malware attacks, denial-of-service attacks, and the distribution of illegal content. The borderless nature of cyberspace makes cybercrime particularly challenging to investigate and prosecute, often requiring international cooperation among law enforcement agencies. The increasing reliance on digital technologies in all aspects of life has made cybercrime a significant and growing concern for individuals, businesses, and governments worldwide.
Cyberspace refers to electronic networks of interaction between individuals at different computer terminals, linking people at a level – in a dimension – that has no regard for territorial boundaries or physical presence. It is a virtual realm created by interconnected computer networks, primarily the internet, where individuals can communicate, interact, and exchange information regardless of their physical location. Cyberspace encompasses a wide range of online activities, including social networking, email communication, online shopping, virtual gaming, and accessing information through the World Wide Web. The nature of cyberspace allows for the formation of online communities based on shared interests, identities, or goals, transcending geographical limitations. This virtual environment has become an increasingly significant space for social interaction, economic activity, and cultural exchange in modern society. The lack of physical presence and territorial boundaries in cyberspace raises unique social, ethical, and legal challenges related to issues such as privacy, security, and governance.
Data Analysis Concepts refer to the theoretical and methodological principles, techniques, and procedures that underpin the systematic process of inspecting, cleansing, transforming, and modelling data in social research with the goal of discovering useful information, informing conclusions, and supporting decision-making. This category encompasses various statistical measures, including measures of central tendency (like mean, median, mode) and measures of dispersion (like range, standard deviation, interquartile range), which summarise and describe the distribution of data. It also includes concepts related to understanding relationships between variables, such as correlation (the degree to which variables vary together) and causation (where one variable directly influences another), as well as the logical reasoning (causal logic) behind establishing such relationships. Furthermore, it covers key aspects of measurement quality, including the operational definition of concepts, and principles that ensure the reliability (consistency) and validity (accuracy) of data analysis, as well as specific metrics like incidence and prevalence in demographic or epidemiological studies. These concepts are crucial for interpreting empirical material, testing hypotheses, and drawing valid and reliable conclusions about social phenomena in sociological inquiry.
Data_Collection_And_Fieldwork_Process encompasses systematic methods for gathering empirical information and evidence about social phenomena through direct engagement with research subjects and settings. These processes involve researchers actively collecting primary data through various techniques that range from highly structured to completely unstructured approaches. They include both quantitative methods that seek to measure and enumerate social phenomena and qualitative methods that aim to understand meaning, experience, and social context. These processes require researchers to establish relationships with research subjects, navigate ethical considerations, and develop skills in data collection techniques. The choice among these methods depends on research questions, theoretical orientation, and practical constraints. These processes are fundamental to empirical sociology and provide the foundation for evidence-based understanding of social life and social phenomena.
The death rate, also known as the crude death rate, is the number of deaths per 1,000 population in a given year. It is a fundamental demographic indicator that measures the mortality level of a population. The crude death rate is calculated by dividing the total number of deaths recorded in a year by the total population (usually the mid-year population estimate) and then multiplying the result by 1,000. This rate is influenced by various factors, including the age structure of the population (a population with a larger proportion of elderly individuals will typically have a higher death rate), the prevalence of diseases, levels of healthcare and sanitation, nutritional standards, environmental conditions, and socioeconomic factors. A high death rate can indicate a population facing health crises, poverty, or a large elderly population, while a low death rate may suggest better health conditions and a younger population structure. Like the crude birth rate, the crude death rate is considered "crude" because it does not account for the age and sex distribution of the population, which can significantly affect mortality rates. However, it provides a useful overall measure for comparing mortality levels across different populations and tracking changes over time.
A defended neighborhood is a neighborhood that residents identify through defined community borders and through a perception that adjacent areas are geographically separate and socially different. This concept highlights the social construction of neighborhood boundaries and the sense of territoriality and identity that residents develop in relation to their local area. Residents of a defended neighborhood often feel a strong sense of belonging and may actively work to maintain the perceived social and physical boundaries of their community, sometimes in response to perceived threats or differences from neighboring areas. This can involve social activities, community organisations, and even informal surveillance to reinforce the neighborhood's identity and distinctiveness. The concept of a defended neighborhood is relevant to understanding urban sociology, community studies, and issues related to social cohesion and inter-neighborhood relations. The perceived differences between a defended neighborhood and adjacent areas can be based on factors such as socioeconomic status, ethnicity, lifestyle, or levels of crime.
Deforestation is the destruction of forested land, often by commercial logging, agriculture, urbanisation, and other human activities. It involves the clearing or removal of forests and woodlands, leading to a reduction in the area covered by trees. Deforestation has significant environmental consequences, including habitat loss for countless plant and animal species, soil erosion, disruption of water cycles, increased greenhouse gas emissions contributing to climate change, and reduced biodiversity. The drivers of deforestation are complex and often interconnected, involving economic pressures, population growth, and unsustainable land management practices. While logging can provide timber for various uses and agriculture can create land for food production, when these activities are not managed sustainably, they can lead to widespread deforestation with long-lasting negative impacts on ecosystems and human societies. Efforts to combat deforestation include promoting sustainable forestry practices, reforestation initiatives, protecting existing forests through conservation efforts, and addressing the underlying economic and social factors that drive forest clearing.
A degradation ceremony is an aspect of the socialisation process within total institutions, such as prisons, military boot camps, and mental hospitals, in which people are subjected to humiliating rituals and procedures designed to strip away their existing identities and self-concepts. The purpose of these ceremonies is to break down the individual's sense of self and replace it with an identity that is more compliant with the rules and expectations of the institution. These rituals can involve public shaming, the confiscation of personal belongings, the assignment of dehumanizing labels, and the enforcement of strict rules and routines that leave little room for individual expression or autonomy. The degradation ceremony marks the individual's entry into the total institution and signals the beginning of their resocialisation into the institutional culture. By systematically undermining the individual's former identity, the institution aims to create a blank slate upon which a new, institutionally defined identity can be inscribed. This process is a key mechanism through which total institutions maintain control and order over their populations.
Deindustrialisation is the systematic, widespread withdrawal of investment in basic aspects of productivity such as factories and plants, leading to a decline in manufacturing and industrial activity in a region or country. This process is often accompanied by a shift towards a service-based economy, with a greater emphasis on sectors like finance, information technology, and healthcare. Deindustrialisation can be caused by various factors, including technological advancements that automate production, the globalisation of manufacturing leading to production moving to countries with lower labor costs, and a shift in consumer demand towards services rather than manufactured goods. While deindustrialisation can lead to economic restructuring and the emergence of new industries, it can also result in job losses in the manufacturing sector, economic hardship for affected communities, and increased social inequality if new opportunities are not readily available or accessible to all. The social and economic consequences of deindustrialisation have been a significant area of study in sociology, with researchers examining its impact on employment, social class, and community well-being.
Democracy is a political system in which power is exercised by the people as a whole, either directly or through elected representatives. Key principles of democracy typically include free and fair elections, the rule of law, protection of individual rights and freedoms (such as freedom of speech, assembly, and the press), and the accountability of government to the people. Democratic systems can take various forms, such as parliamentary democracies, presidential democracies, and direct democracies, each with its own specific structures and processes for decision-making and governance. The concept of democracy is often associated with values such as equality, participation, and the consent of the governed. The spread and consolidation of democracy have been major themes in political sociology, with researchers studying the factors that contribute to the establishment and maintenance of democratic institutions around the world.
Demographic_And_Biological_Identity_Quality represents fundamental characteristics based on biological attributes, life course position, and basic demographic categories that serve as primary markers of social identity and classification. These qualities include biological sex distinctions, age-related characteristics, and reproductive patterns that influence social roles, expectations, and life experiences. They encompass both individual attributes and population-level characteristics that shape social organisation and demographic patterns. These qualities often serve as the basis for social categorisation and can influence access to resources, social roles, and life opportunities. While biologically grounded, these qualities are also socially interpreted and can carry different meanings and implications across cultures and historical periods.
Demographic_And_Social_Integration_Process encompasses fundamental population dynamics and social processes that shape demographic patterns and promote social integration across different groups within society. These processes include both biological reproduction patterns that determine population growth and composition, and social processes that facilitate the integration of different groups through intimate relationships and family formation. Fertility represents the demographic foundation of population change, while miscegenation involves the social and biological integration of different racial or ethnic groups through intermarriage and reproduction. These processes are central to understanding how societies maintain demographic stability, manage diversity, and create new forms of social identity through the blending of different cultural and ethnic backgrounds. They highlight the intersection of demographic change with social integration and identity formation in diverse societies.
Demographic_And_Spatial_Transformation_Process encompasses the fundamental changes in population characteristics, residential patterns, and spatial organisation that accompany broader socioeconomic development and create new forms of social organisation and community structure. These processes involve significant shifts in where and how people live, the age structure of populations, and the spatial distribution of economic and social activities. Urbanisation represents one of the most significant spatial transformations in human history, concentrating populations in cities and creating new forms of social organisation, economic coordination, and cultural life. This process fundamentally alters social relationships, economic opportunities, and environmental conditions. Demographic transition involves systematic changes in birth and death rates that reshape the age structure of societies and create new challenges and opportunities for social organisation. Greying represents a specific demographic transformation where societies experience significant increases in elderly populations, requiring adaptations in healthcare systems, social support networks, and economic arrangements. Gentrification illustrates how spatial transformation can involve the displacement of existing communities and the reconfiguration of urban social geography. These processes are interconnected and mutually reinforcing, as urbanisation often accompanies demographic transitions, while changing age structures influence spatial patterns of residence and community development. Understanding these processes is essential for analysing contemporary social challenges related to housing, community development, social services, and the sustainability of different forms of social organisation.
Demographic transition is an interpretation of population change, which holds that a stable ratio of births to deaths is achieved once a certain level of economic prosperity and modernisation has been reached. This process involves a shift from high birth and death rates to low birth and death rates as a society develops economically and socially. The transition typically occurs in stages, as described in the demographic transition theory, moving from a period of high fertility and mortality to one of low fertility and mortality, with a period of rapid population growth in between when death rates decline before birth rates do. The end result is a stabilisation of the population at a new size, often larger than the pre-transition level, with a different age structure. Factors contributing to this transition include improvements in healthcare, sanitation, education, and changes in cultural norms and values related to family size. Understanding the demographic transition is crucial for analysing population trends, planning for resource allocation, and addressing social and economic challenges associated with population change.
Demographic transition theory is a thesis linking population patterns to a society's level of technological development, suggesting that as societies industrialise and modernize, they go through a predictable sequence of changes in birth and death rates. The theory typically outlines four or five stages. In the first stage (pre-industrial), both birth rates and death rates are high, resulting in a relatively stable and low population size. In the second stage (early industrialisation), death rates begin to decline due to improvements in sanitation, healthcare, and nutrition, while birth rates remain high, leading to rapid population growth. In the third stage (late industrialisation), birth rates also start to decline as societies become more urbanised, education levels rise (especially for women), and contraception becomes more widely available, resulting in a slowing of population growth. In the fourth stage (post-industrial), both birth rates and death rates are low, leading to a stable or even declining population size. Some versions of the theory include a fifth stage where death rates may slightly exceed birth rates, leading to further population decline. This theory provides a framework for understanding historical population changes and for making projections about future population trends based on a society's level of development.
Demography is the scientific study of the characteristics of human populations, including their size, composition (such as age, sex, race, and ethnicity), distribution, and dynamics (changes over time due to births, deaths, and migration). Demographers use statistical methods to analyse population data and trends, seeking to understand the factors that influence population growth, decline, and structure. Key areas of study in demography include fertility (birth rates), mortality (death rates), and migration (the movement of people from one place to another). Demographic research provides essential information for governments, businesses, and other organisations for planning purposes, such as forecasting future population size, age structure, and geographic distribution, which can inform decisions related to healthcare, education, infrastructure, and social welfare programs. Demography also plays a crucial role in understanding social change and addressing issues related to population aging, urbanisation, and environmental sustainability.
A denomination is a large, organised religion that is not officially linked with the state or government, operating independently and typically accepting the existence of other religious groups within a pluralistic society. Unlike a state church, which is officially endorsed and supported by the government, a denomination maintains its own governance and financial autonomy. While denominations may have a significant presence and influence within a society, they do not hold a position of exclusive authority or official recognition by the state. They generally have a well-established history, a large membership base, and a formal organisational structure with defined doctrines and practices. The concept of denomination is particularly relevant in countries with a separation of church and state and a diverse religious landscape, such as the United States, where numerous Christian denominations, as well as other major religions, operate freely.
Descent refers to the system by which members of a society trace kinship over generations, establishing their familial connections and lineage. This system dictates how individuals are related to one another and can influence inheritance patterns, social obligations, and group membership. Societies employ various descent systems, including patrilineal descent, where kinship is traced through the father's line; matrilineal descent, where it is traced through the mother's line; and bilateral descent, where both sides of the family are considered equally important. The way descent is reckoned shapes social organisation and the transmission of social status and property across generations. Understanding descent systems is crucial for analysing family structures and kinship relationships in different cultures.
Descent_And_Authority_System represents the fundamental organisational principles that govern how societies trace lineage, distribute power, and structure social hierarchies within family and broader social contexts. This class encompasses both the mechanisms for determining kinship affiliation and inheritance rights (patrilineal and matrilineal descent) and the systems of social authority and control (patriarchy and matriarchy). These systems are interconnected as descent patterns often correlate with authority structures, creating comprehensive frameworks for organizing social relationships, property transmission, and decision-making processes. The variation within this class reflects different cultural solutions to questions of social organisation, gender roles, and intergenerational continuity, demonstrating how societies balance competing needs for stability, legitimacy, and social reproduction.
Desertification refers to instances of intense land degradation in arid, semi-arid, and dry sub-humid areas, resulting in desert-like conditions over large areas where previously there was vegetated land. This process is primarily caused by human activities, such as overgrazing, deforestation, unsustainable agricultural practices, and improper irrigation, which exacerbate the effects of climate variations and droughts. Desertification leads to the loss of fertile topsoil, reduced agricultural productivity, decreased biodiversity, and can displace human populations, contributing to poverty and social instability. It is a significant environmental challenge, particularly in regions with fragile ecosystems, and addressing it requires sustainable land management practices and international cooperation.
Developmental_And_Economic_Society_Type represents comprehensive social formations organised around distinct modes of economic production, technological capabilities, and social organisation that characterise different stages of societal development and economic complexity. These aggregates reflect how societies have evolved different approaches to organizing production, managing resources, and structuring social relationships based on their technological capabilities and environmental contexts. They demonstrate the relationship between economic organisation and social structure, showing how different modes of production generate distinct patterns of social stratification, cultural practices, and institutional arrangements. These society types illustrate both historical progression in human social organisation and contemporary diversity in approaches to economic and social development across the global system.
Deviance refers to behaviour that violates the standards of conduct or expectations of a group or society. What is considered deviant varies across cultures, social groups, and time periods, as it is defined by social norms and values. Deviant behaviour can range from minor infractions of social norms to serious violations of laws. Sociologists study deviance to understand why people violate norms, how societies react to deviance, and the role of deviance in social change. Various theories attempt to explain deviance, including anomie theory, differential association theory, control theory, and labeling theory. Deviance is not inherently negative; while some deviant acts are harmful, others can challenge existing norms and lead to social progress.
Deviance and Social Control is a core subfield within sociology that systematically examines behaviours, actions, and attributes that violate established social norms, rules, or laws, as well as the diverse mechanisms societies employ to regulate and respond to such norm-breaking. This field explores the social construction of deviance, investigating how and why certain behaviours are defined as deviant while others are not, and how these definitions vary across different cultures, time periods, and social groups. It delves into the causes and patterns of deviant behaviour, drawing on various sociological theories (e.g., anomie theory, labeling theory, control theory, differential association). Concurrently, it analyses the formal mechanisms of social control, such as law enforcement and the criminal justice system (police, courts, prisons, capital punishment), and informal mechanisms, like social approval or disapproval, peer pressure, and gossip, which maintain social order. The subfield also studies the consequences of deviance for individuals (e.g., stigma, rehabilitation) and society, and the interplay between deviance and social change.
A deviant subculture is a subculture whose members hold values, norms, beliefs, and behaviours that differ substantially from those of the majority or dominant culture in a society. These subcultures often emerge as a form of resistance or reaction to mainstream norms and may provide alternative ways of life and social identities for their members. Examples of deviant subcultures can include some youth gangs, radical political groups, or groups with unconventional lifestyles. The values and practices of a deviant subculture may be seen as negative or threatening by the wider society, leading to social stigma and conflict. Studying deviant subcultures helps sociologists understand the diversity of cultural expressions within a society and the processes through which certain behaviours and values come to be defined as deviant.
Diaspora refers to the dispersal of an ethnic population from an original homeland into foreign areas, often in a forced manner or under traumatic circumstances such as war, famine, or persecution. The term can also refer to the communities formed by these dispersed people in their new locations, who often maintain a sense of connection to their homeland and a shared cultural identity. Examples of diasporas include the Jewish diaspora, the African diaspora resulting from the slave trade, and the Armenian diaspora following the genocide. Diasporic communities often play a significant role in transnational networks, maintaining cultural traditions, and sometimes engaging in political or economic activities related to their homeland. The study of diasporas examines issues of identity, belonging, cultural adaptation, and the complex relationships between diasporic communities and both their homeland and their adopted countries.
Differential association is a theory of deviance proposed by Edwin Sutherland that holds that violation of rules results from exposure to attitudes favourable to criminal acts. This theory suggests that criminal behaviour is learned through interactions with others, particularly in intimate personal groups. Individuals learn not only the techniques of committing crimes but also the attitudes, values, and rationalisations that support criminal behaviour. The likelihood of engaging in deviance depends on the frequency, intensity, priority, and duration of an individual's association with those who hold deviant attitudes compared to those who hold conventional attitudes. Differential association theory emphasises the social learning aspect of deviance, suggesting that it is not simply the result of individual pathology but rather a product of social interaction and learning within specific social environments.
Diffusion is the process by which a cultural item, such as an idea, innovation, practice, or material object, is spread from one group to another or from one society to another. This can occur through various forms of contact, including trade, migration, communication, and conquest. Cultural diffusion plays a significant role in cultural change, as societies are constantly borrowing and adapting elements from other cultures. The rate and extent of diffusion can be influenced by factors such as the compatibility of the new cultural item with existing cultural elements, the social status of the adopters, and the intensity of contact between the groups. Diffusion can lead to both cultural enrichment and cultural homogenisation, depending on the specific context and the nature of the cultural exchange.
Disability studies is a field of inquiry that critically investigates the position of disabled people in societies, including their experiences, history, and the social, political, and cultural factors that shape their lives. It examines how disability is defined, understood, and represented in society, often challenging medicalised and deficit-based models of disability that focus solely on individual impairments. Instead, disability studies emphasises the social model of disability, which posits that disability is primarily a result of societal barriers and attitudes that exclude and disadvantage people with impairments. This field also explores the history of disability activism and the ongoing campaigns by disabled people and their organisations to achieve equality, inclusion, and social justice. Disability studies is an interdisciplinary field drawing on sociology, anthropology, history, literature, and other disciplines to provide a comprehensive understanding of disability as a social phenomenon.
Discovery is the process of making known or sharing the existence of an aspect of reality that was previously unknown or unrecognised. In the context of culture and society, discovery can involve the identification of new elements of the natural world, the uncovering of existing but previously unknown knowledge, or the recognition of new ways of understanding or perceiving reality. Discoveries can have significant impacts on societies, leading to technological advancements, scientific breakthroughs, and changes in cultural beliefs and practices. Unlike invention, which involves creating something new, discovery involves finding or becoming aware of something that already exists. The social impact of a discovery often depends on how it is interpreted, disseminated, and integrated into the existing cultural framework.
Discrimination is the process of denying opportunities and equal rights to individuals and groups because of prejudice or other arbitrary reasons, often stemming from negative stereotypes and biases. This can manifest in various forms, including individual acts of prejudice and systemic or institutional discrimination embedded in policies and practices. Discrimination can target individuals based on a wide range of characteristics, such as age, sex, nationality, religion, skin color, disability, or physical appearance. It involves treating people unfairly or unequally due to their membership in a particular group, rather than based on their individual merits or abilities. The consequences of discrimination can be significant, leading to social exclusion, economic disadvantage, limited access to resources, and psychological harm for those who experience it. While overt forms of discrimination are often condemned, more subtle or indirect forms can persist and continue to perpetuate inequalities within society. Addressing discrimination requires not only legal and policy measures but also efforts to challenge underlying prejudices and stereotypes through education and awareness. The impact of discrimination can be particularly pronounced when individuals face multiple forms of discrimination based on intersecting aspects of their identity, such as age combined with gender, race, or disability.
Discrimination_And_Marginalisation_Quality represents characteristics and experiences related to systematic exclusion, prejudice, and disadvantage based on group membership or social identity. These qualities include various forms of bias, discrimination, and marginalisation that create and maintain social inequalities. They encompass both individual experiences of prejudice and systemic patterns of exclusion that affect entire groups. These qualities highlight how social differences become the basis for unequal treatment and how certain groups face systematic barriers to full social participation. Understanding these qualities is essential for analysing patterns of social exclusion and the mechanisms through which inequality is perpetuated across different social categories.
Disengagement theory is a functionalist theory of aging introduced by Cumming and Henry that contends that society and the aging individual mutually sever many of their relationships as the individual approaches death. This theory suggests that this mutual withdrawal is a natural and inevitable process that benefits both the individual and society. For the aging individual, disengagement allows for a peaceful transition out of social roles and responsibilities, reducing stress and providing time for introspection. For society, the disengagement of older individuals allows younger generations to take over positions of power and responsibility, ensuring social continuity and preventing disruption caused by the potential incapacity or death of older members in key roles. This theory has faced criticism for its assumption that disengagement is always functional and beneficial, as many older adults remain active and engaged in society and may experience negative consequences from forced or unwanted social withdrawal, such as loneliness and a decline in well-being. Alternative theories of aging emphasise the importance of continued social engagement and activity for maintaining health and life satisfaction in later years.
Documentary research is a method of data collection and analysis that involves the study of written texts and other documents, including personal diaries, government policies, fictional works, mass media output, historical records, and organisational reports. This type of research provides valuable insights into social phenomena, cultural values, historical trends, and individual experiences. Researchers using documentary methods analyse the content, context, and meaning of these documents to answer their research questions. Personal diaries and letters can offer rich qualitative data about individual lives and perspectives. Government policies and official reports can reveal institutional practices and societal priorities. Fictional works and mass media can reflect and shape cultural norms and ideologies. Historical documents provide evidence of past events and social structures. The strength of documentary research lies in its ability to provide access to information that might not be available through other methods, such as surveys or interviews, and to study phenomena over time. It is often used in historical sociology, media studies, and qualitative research to provide context and depth to sociological analysis.
A domestic partnership is a legal or socially recognised status for two unrelated adults who have chosen to share one another's lives in a committed relationship of mutual caring, who reside together, and who agree to be jointly responsible for their dependents, basic living expenses, and other common necessities. While offering some of the rights and benefits of marriage, domestic partnerships typically do not grant the full range of legal protections afforded to married couples under federal law. The criteria for establishing a domestic partnership can vary depending on the jurisdiction or organisation, often requiring a formal registration process. Domestic partnerships were initially established to provide recognition and benefits to same-sex couples before the legalisation of same-sex marriage, but they are also available to heterosexual couples who choose not to marry. The specific rights and responsibilities associated with domestic partnership can include healthcare benefits, inheritance rights, and the ability to make medical decisions for a partner. The rise of domestic partnerships reflects changing social norms and a broader recognition of diverse forms of intimate relationships.
Downsizing refers to reductions taken in a company's workforce as part of deindustrialisation or other economic restructuring efforts. This often involves laying off employees, eliminating positions, or offering early retirement packages to reduce the size of the organisation and lower labor costs. Downsizing can be a response to economic downturns, technological advancements that reduce the need for human labor, or a strategic decision to streamline operations and improve efficiency. While downsizing may benefit companies by increasing profits, it can have significant negative consequences for the affected workers and their communities, leading to job losses, financial insecurity, and social disruption. The social and economic impacts of downsizing are often studied by sociologists interested in the changing nature of work and the effects of economic restructuring on individuals and society.
Dramaturgical analysis is an approach to the study of social interaction based on the use of metaphors derived from the theatre, famously developed by sociologist Erving Goffman. This perspective views social life as a performance, with individuals as actors on a stage, constantly trying to manage the impressions they make on others. Key concepts in dramaturgical analysis include the "front stage," where individuals present themselves in formal and expected ways to an audience; the "back stage," where individuals can relax their public image and behave more spontaneously; and "impression management," the conscious or unconscious effort to control how others perceive us. Goffman argued that social interaction is a delicate balancing act where individuals strive to maintain face (a positive social identity) and avoid embarrassment or disruption of the performance. By analysing social interactions through the lens of theatrical performance, dramaturgical analysis provides insights into the ways individuals construct and present their identities in social settings.
The dramaturgical approach is a view of social interaction, popularised by Erving Goffman, under which people are examined as if they were theatrical performers on a stage. In this perspective, individuals in social situations are seen as actors who present themselves and their roles to an audience (others present in the interaction). Just like actors in a play, people use props (material objects), scripts (established behaviours and routines), and costumes (appearance and demeanor) to convey particular images and create desired impressions. The goal of this performance is often to manage how others perceive them and to maintain a certain definition of the situation. Goffman emphasised the importance of "face-work," the efforts individuals make to maintain their own sense of dignity and the positive image they present to others, as well as to uphold the face of those they are interacting with. The dramaturgical approach highlights the performative nature of social life and the active role individuals play in shaping social reality through their interactions.
A dyad is a two-member group, representing the smallest possible social group. Dyads are characterised by intense interaction and mutual dependence between the two members, as each person's participation is crucial for the group's existence. The intimacy and directness of interaction in a dyad can lead to strong emotional bonds, but also to potential instability, as the withdrawal or loss of one member dissolves the group entirely. Decision-making in a dyad is often more direct and personal compared to larger groups, as there are only two perspectives to consider. However, disagreements can be more challenging to resolve without the possibility of a third-party mediator. Dyads play a fundamental role in social life, forming the basis of many close relationships, such as romantic partnerships and close friendships. The unique dynamics of dyads have been a subject of interest in sociology, particularly in the study of small group interactions.
E-commerce, short for electronic commerce, encompasses the numerous ways that people with access to the Internet can conduct business transactions from their computers or other digital devices. This includes a wide range of online activities such as buying and selling goods and services, conducting financial transactions, and exchanging information for commercial purposes. E-commerce has revolutionised the way businesses operate and consumers shop, offering convenience, accessibility, and a global marketplace. It includes various models, such as business-to-consumer (B2C) retail, business-to-business (B2B) transactions, and consumer-to-consumer (C2C) platforms. The growth of e-commerce has had significant economic and social impacts, transforming industries, creating new business opportunities, and altering consumer behaviour.
Ecclesia refers to a religious organisation that claims to include most or all of the members of a society and is recognised as the national or official religion, often closely aligned with the state. In an ecclesia, there is typically no sharp distinction between the religious and secular spheres, and membership is often by birth rather than by conscious choice. The ecclesia tends to have a hierarchical structure and may exert significant influence over government policies and social norms. While the concept of ecclesia is less common in modern, pluralistic societies with a separation of church and state, historical examples include the Church of England or state-supported religions in some European countries. In sociological terms, ecclesia represents one end of a continuum of religious organisations, with sects and cults at the other end, and denominations falling somewhere in between.
Economic_And_Corporate_Organisation represents collective entities organised primarily for economic production, service delivery, or market participation within capitalist economic systems. These aggregates are characterised by hierarchical authority structures, specialised divisions of labor, and orientation toward efficiency and profit generation. They range from small-scale local enterprises to massive multinational entities that operate across global markets. These organisations serve as primary vehicles for economic activity, technological innovation, and wealth creation, while also representing sites of class relations and power dynamics within capitalist societies. Their structure and operations reflect the fundamental tensions between efficiency and worker welfare, between local and global interests, and between private profit and public benefit that characterise modern economic systems.
Economic_And_Industrial_Transformation_Process encompasses the fundamental shifts in economic organisation, production systems, and industrial structures that characterise major transitions in societal development. These processes involve comprehensive changes in how societies organise production, distribute goods and services, and structure economic relationships between different social classes and institutions. The transformation from traditional agricultural economies to industrial systems, and subsequently to post-industrial arrangements, represents one of the most significant social changes in human history. These processes are characterised by technological innovation, changes in labor organisation, shifts in the relationship between capital and labor, and the emergence of new forms of economic coordination and control. The Industrial Revolution exemplifies how technological advancement can trigger cascading social changes that reshape entire societies. Post-Fordism demonstrates how production systems continue to evolve in response to technological capabilities and market demands. Deindustrialisation shows how economic transformation can also involve the decline of previously dominant sectors, creating new challenges and opportunities. These processes fundamentally alter social stratification, work experiences, community structures, and the overall organisation of social life, making them central to understanding modern socioeconomic development.
Economic_And_Material_Inequality_Quality represents characteristics related to the distribution of economic resources, material conditions, and financial security that create and reflect class-based stratification. These qualities include various measures of poverty, economic deprivation, and the concentration of resources among different social groups. They encompass both absolute measures of material need and relative assessments of economic position within society. These qualities are fundamental to understanding class structure, economic inequality, and the material conditions that shape life chances and opportunities. They highlight how economic systems create differential access to resources and how this translates into broader patterns of social stratification and inequality.
Economic interdependence is the outcome of specialisation and the division of labor, where self-sufficiency is superseded and individuals, regions, or nations depend on others to produce many or most of the goods and services they need to sustain their lives. This interconnectedness arises when different entities focus on producing specific goods or services more efficiently than others and then trade with each other to meet their diverse needs and wants. Economic interdependence can lead to increased efficiency, productivity, and overall economic growth by allowing for specialisation and economies of scale. However, it also means that disruptions in one part of the interdependent system can have ripple effects across other parts, creating vulnerabilities to economic shocks and global events. The rise of globalisation has significantly increased economic interdependence between countries, making national economies more reliant on international trade and financial flows.
An economic system is the social institution through which goods and services are produced, distributed, and consumed within a society. It encompasses the organisational arrangements, rules, and practices that govern how a society allocates its resources to satisfy the needs and wants of its members. Different societies have adopted various types of economic systems throughout history, including traditional economies, command economies, market economies (capitalism), and mixed economies that combine elements of different systems. Each type of economic system has its own set of principles regarding ownership of resources, decision-making processes, and mechanisms for production, distribution, and consumption. The dominant economic system in a society has a profound impact on its social structure, levels of inequality, and the daily lives of its people.
The economy refers to the system of production and exchange which provides for the material needs of individuals living in a given society. It encompasses all activities related to the creation, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. The economy is a fundamental aspect of social life, as it shapes how people earn a living, access resources, and interact with one another in the process of fulfilling their material needs and wants. The structure and functioning of the economy are influenced by a complex interplay of social, cultural, political, and technological factors. Sociologists study the economy to understand its impact on social inequality, social mobility, work, and other aspects of social life. Different types of economies, such as agrarian, industrial, and post-industrial economies, have distinct characteristics and social consequences.
Education is a formal process of learning in which some people consciously teach while others adopt the social role of learner, typically occurring in institutions like schools, colleges, and universities. However, education also encompasses informal learning that takes place outside of formal settings, such as through family, peers, and media. The goals of education are multifaceted, including the transmission of knowledge, skills, values, and cultural norms from one generation to the next, as well as the personal and intellectual development of individuals. Education plays a crucial role in socialisation, preparing individuals for their roles in society and contributing to social mobility. Sociologists study education to understand its impact on social inequality, its relationship to the economy, and its role in shaping individual identities and life chances.
The elite model is a view of society as ruled by a small group of individuals who share a common set of political and economic interests, effectively holding the majority of power and influence. This perspective suggests that despite the appearance of democracy, major decisions are made by a relatively cohesive group of elites who control key institutions, such as corporations, the government, and the military. These elites may come from similar social backgrounds, share similar values, and work to maintain their privileged positions and the existing social order. The elite model contrasts with the pluralist model, which argues that power is more widely distributed among various competing interest groups in society. Sociologists who subscribe to the elite model often study the social backgrounds, networks, and decision-making processes of those in power to understand how societal control is exercised.
An encounter refers to a meeting between two or more individuals in a situation of face-to-face interaction, representing a basic unit of social interaction studied in sociology. Encounters can range from brief and fleeting interactions with strangers to more extended and meaningful interactions with people we know well. Sociologist Erving Goffman's work on micro-sociology extensively analysed the structure and dynamics of social encounters, highlighting how individuals present themselves, manage impressions, and negotiate social order in these face-to-face settings. The study of encounters examines the subtle cues, nonverbal communication, and shared understandings that shape how individuals interact and create social reality in their daily lives. Even seemingly minor encounters contribute to the ongoing construction and maintenance of social relationships and social structures.
Endogamy is the forbidding of marriage or sexual relations outside one's social group, often enforced through social pressure, norms, traditions, or even legal restrictions. The social group in question can be based on various factors such as caste, ethnicity, religion, social class, or kinship ties. The practice of endogamy aims to maintain the homogeneity, social boundaries, and cultural integrity of the group by encouraging marriage and reproduction within its confines. It can play a significant role in preserving group identity, values, and social hierarchies across generations. While endogamous practices are prevalent in many societies throughout history, the strictness of these rules and the specific groups to which they apply can vary widely. In modern, more open societies, while formal rules of endogamy may have weakened, informal social pressures and preferences for marrying within similar social backgrounds often persist.
An entrepreneur is someone who starts or owns a business venture and takes personal financial risks in the hope of making a profit. Entrepreneurs are often characterised by their innovativeness, initiative, and willingness to take on challenges to bring new ideas, products, or services to the market. They play a crucial role in economic development by creating jobs, driving innovation, and fostering competition. The success of an entrepreneur's venture is often dependent on factors such as market demand, effective business planning, access to resources, and the ability to adapt to changing circumstances. Entrepreneurship can be a driving force for economic growth and social change, as new businesses can disrupt existing industries and create new opportunities.
Environmental justice is a legal strategy and a social movement based on claims that racial minorities and low-income communities are subjected disproportionately to environmental hazards and pollution compared to wealthier, often white, communities. This perspective highlights the unequal distribution of environmental risks and benefits, arguing that marginalised groups often bear a greater burden of pollution, waste disposal sites, and other environmental hazards due to systemic inequalities and discriminatory practices. The environmental justice movement advocates for fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. It seeks to address the social and political dimensions of environmental problems and to ensure that all communities have a healthy and sustainable environment.
Environmental Sociology is a specialised subfield within sociology that focuses on the complex and reciprocal interactions and relationships between human societies and the natural environment. It examines how social factors, such as economic systems, political structures, cultural values, and technological advancements, shape environmental conditions and problems (e.g., global warming, deforestation, desertification, pollution, resource depletion). Conversely, it also investigates how environmental changes and challenges impact human societies, influencing social inequalities, migration patterns, health outcomes, and social conflicts. Environmental sociologists analyse the social causes and consequences of environmental degradation, the social movements advocating for environmental protection and justice, and the development of environmental policies and sustainable practices. This field often highlights issues of environmental justice, which addresses the disproportionate exposure of marginalised communities to environmental hazards. It emphasises a critical and systemic approach to understanding the human-environment nexus in a globalised world, often drawing on concepts like risk society and manufactured risk.Aging_Study = Aging Studies is an interdisciplinary academic field dedicated to the comprehensive examination of the multifaceted process of human aging and the experiences of older adults within societal contexts. This domain draws insights from sociology, psychology, biology, demography, public health, economics, and policy studies to understand the physiological, cognitive, emotional, and social changes that occur throughout the life course, particularly in later life. It focuses on the social roles older people occupy, the challenges they face (such as ageism, health disparities, and retirement transitions), and the diverse societal responses to an increasingly aging global population. Researchers in Aging Studies investigate topics like social support networks, elder care systems, generational relations, healthy aging initiatives, and the broader impact of demographic shifts on social institutions and resource allocation. The field also addresses the social construction of old age and the cultural perceptions of longevity, aiming to inform public policy and promote well-being, social inclusion, and equitable opportunities for individuals across all life stages within society. It is crucial for anticipating future societal needs.
The equilibrium model is Talcott Parsons's functionalist view of society as tending toward a state of stability or balance, where different parts of the social system work together to maintain overall equilibrium. Parsons argued that societies are complex systems with interdependent parts, each fulfilling certain functions that contribute to the system's survival and stability. When disruptions or changes occur in one part of the system, other parts will adjust to restore balance and maintain social order. This model emphasises the self-regulating nature of social systems and their tendency to seek a state of equilibrium. However, it has been criticised for its focus on stability and its limited attention to social conflict and social change.
Esteem refers to the reputation that a particular individual has earned within an occupation, profession, or social group, reflecting the respect and honor they receive from others based on their skills, achievements, and character within that specific context. It is often associated with competence, integrity, and the positive contributions an individual makes to their field or community. Esteem can be differentiated from prestige, which is a more general form of social honor and respect associated with one's social status or position in society, regardless of specific achievements. While prestige might be linked to factors like wealth, family background, or occupation in a broad sense, esteem is more specifically tied to how well an individual performs in their particular role or area of expertise and the recognition they receive for it from their peers and others in that domain.
An ethnic group is a group of people who are set apart from others because of their shared national origin or distinctive cultural patterns, which can include language, religion, traditions, customs, and shared history. Members of an ethnic group typically share a sense of common identity and belonging based on these cultural elements, which distinguish them from other groups in society. Ethnicity is a social construct, meaning that it is defined and maintained through social interaction and cultural practices rather than being based on fixed biological traits. The boundaries of ethnic groups can be fluid and may change over time due to factors such as migration, intermarriage, and social and political contexts. The study of ethnic groups is central to understanding cultural diversity, intergroup relations, and issues of identity and belonging in sociology.
Ethnocentrism is the tendency to assume that one's own culture and way of life represent the norm or are superior to all others, leading to the evaluation of other cultures based on the standards and values of one's own culture. This can result in a biased or distorted view of other societies and their practices, often leading to misunderstandings, prejudice, and conflict. Ethnocentrism can manifest in various ways, from making negative judgments about the customs or beliefs of another culture to believing that one's own cultural practices are the only correct or natural way of doing things. While a certain degree of in-group preference is common in all cultures, extreme ethnocentrism can hinder cross-cultural understanding and cooperation. Sociologists strive to avoid ethnocentrism in their research by practicing cultural relativism, which involves understanding and evaluating other cultures from their own perspectives.
Ethnography is a qualitative research method that involves the study of an entire social setting or cultural group through extended systematic observation and immersion in the field. Ethnographers aim to gain an in-depth understanding of the culture, behaviours, and social dynamics of the group being studied from the perspective of its members. This often involves the researcher spending a significant amount of time living among the people they are studying, participating in their daily activities, conducting interviews, and analysing cultural artifacts and symbols. The goal of ethnography is to provide a rich and detailed description of the social world of the group under study, capturing the nuances and complexities of their culture and social life. Ethnographic research is often used in anthropology and sociology to explore diverse cultural practices, social structures, and the meanings that people create and share in their everyday interactions.
In sociology, evolutionary theory is a broad perspective that holds that society is moving in a definite direction of progress and increasing complexity over time, often drawing parallels to biological evolution. Early sociological thinkers like Auguste Comte and Herbert Spencer applied evolutionary ideas to the development of human societies, suggesting that they evolve through stages from simpler to more complex forms, characterised by increasing specialisation, differentiation, and social organisation. While classical evolutionary theories often implied a linear and deterministic path of societal development, more contemporary approaches recognise that social change is more complex and can involve multiple pathways and even periods of regression. Modern evolutionary perspectives in sociology may focus on long-term processes of social change, the adaptation of societies to their environments, and the role of technological innovation in driving social evolution.
Exogamy is a social rule or norm that requires people to select mates outside certain groups to which they belong, such as their own family, lineage, clan, or village. The specific groups from which marriage is prohibited vary across cultures. The function of exogamy is often to promote social alliances and cooperation between different groups by creating ties of kinship through marriage. It can also help to prevent incest and maintain genetic diversity within a population. In many societies, the rules of exogamy are deeply embedded in cultural traditions and may be enforced through social sanctions or even legal prohibitions. The definition of the "out-group" for exogamous marriage can range from immediate family members to broader categories of relatives or members of the same local community, depending on cultural norms.
An experiment is a carefully designed and artificially created situation that allows the researcher to manipulate one or more variables (the independent variables) to observe their effect on another variable (the dependent variable), while controlling for other factors that might influence the outcome. Experiments are a key method in quantitative research aimed at establishing causal relationships between variables. They typically involve an experimental group that is exposed to the independent variable and a control group that is not, with both groups being as similar as possible in all other respects, often achieved through random assignment of participants. By comparing the changes in the dependent variable between the experimental and control groups, researchers can draw conclusions about the causal impact of the independent variable. Experiments can be conducted in laboratory settings to maximise control or in field settings to increase ecological validity.
The experimental group in an experiment consists of the subjects who are exposed to an independent variable that is introduced or manipulated by the researcher. The purpose of exposing this group to the independent variable is to observe and measure its effect on the dependent variable, which is the outcome the researcher is interested in. The experimental group is compared to a control group, which does not receive the independent variable, to determine the impact of the manipulation. Researchers carefully design the experiment to ensure that the only systematic difference between the experimental and control groups is the presence or level of the independent variable, allowing them to infer causality if a significant difference in the dependent variable is observed. Random assignment of participants to the experimental and control groups helps to ensure that the groups are equivalent at the start of the experiment, minimizing the influence of confounding variables.
Exploitation theory, particularly within a Marxist framework, views racial subordination in the United States and other capitalist societies as a manifestation of the class system inherent in capitalism. This theory argues that racism and racial inequality serve the interests of the capitalist class by creating a split labor market, where workers are divided along racial lines, leading to lower wages for all workers and hindering the development of class consciousness and solidarity among the working class. By fostering racial antagonism, the bourgeoisie can maintain their power and profits by preventing the unified mobilisation of workers against their exploitation. Exploitation theory suggests that racial prejudice and discrimination are not simply matters of individual attitudes but are deeply embedded in the economic structure of capitalism and serve to perpetuate class inequality.
Expressiveness is a term used by sociologists Talcott Parsons and Robert Bales to refer to a concern for the maintenance of harmony and the internal emotional affairs of the family or a small group. This role is often traditionally associated with women in the family, involving providing emotional support, nurturing relationships, and managing interpersonal conflicts to ensure the well-being and cohesion of the group. Expressive roles focus on the affective and emotional needs of group members, contributing to social integration and solidarity. Parsons and Bales contrasted this with instrumentality, which refers to a focus on task-oriented goals, decision-making, and the external relationships of the group, often traditionally associated with men in the family. These concepts were part of their functionalist analysis of family roles and their contribution to the overall functioning of society.
An extended family is a family group consisting of close relatives extending beyond a couple and their children, living either within the same household or in a close and continuous relationship with one another. This can include grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other kin who play a significant role in the family's social and economic life. Extended family structures were more common in pre-industrial societies and in many cultures around the world, where they often provided a strong network of support, shared resources, and collective caregiving. While the nuclear family (a couple and their dependent children) has become more prevalent in many Western industrialised societies, extended family ties continue to be important for many individuals and can provide valuable social, emotional, and practical support.
Face-work is a term used by sociologist Erving Goffman to refer to the efforts of people to maintain the proper image of themselves and others and to avoid embarrassment or social disruption in public or social interactions. Goffman argued that individuals are constantly engaged in presenting a particular "face" or social identity to others, and they actively work to maintain this face and to help others maintain theirs. Face-work involves various strategies, such as avoiding topics that might cause offense, offering apologies for social gaffes, and helping others to save face when they experience a social mishap. The goal of face-work is to ensure smooth social interaction and to uphold a shared sense of social order and respect among those present. It highlights the delicate and often unspoken rules that govern our interactions and the active role individuals play in managing social impressions.
Factual questions are questions that raise issues concerning matters of fact rather than theoretical interpretations or moral judgments. These questions seek to elicit information that can be verified through observation, measurement, or reliable sources of evidence. In sociological research, factual questions might ask about demographic characteristics (e.g., What is the population of a city?), social trends (e.g., Has the divorce rate increased in the last decade?), or specific events (e.g., What were the main causes of a particular social movement?). Answering factual questions is a fundamental part of sociological inquiry, providing the empirical basis for developing theories and understanding social phenomena. While seemingly straightforward, even factual questions can sometimes involve complex issues of data collection, interpretation, and the reliability of sources. They are distinct from theoretical questions, which explore explanations and relationships between social phenomena, and moral questions, which involve judgments about what is right or wrong.
False consciousness is a term used by Karl Marx to describe an attitude held by members of a class, particularly the proletariat, that does not accurately reflect its objective position within the capitalist system and instead serves the interests of the ruling class (bourgeoisie). This false understanding prevents the working class from recognizing their own exploitation and their shared interests in overthrowing capitalism. Instead, they may adopt the values and beliefs of the bourgeoisie, seeing the existing social order as legitimate or even in their own best interest. Factors contributing to false consciousness can include the influence of ideology disseminated through media, religion, and the education system, which can mask the underlying power dynamics and inequalities of capitalist society. Overcoming false consciousness and developing class consciousness, an awareness of their shared exploitation and the need for collective action, is a crucial step in Marx's theory of social change.
Familism refers to pride in the extended family, expressed through the maintenance of close ties and strong obligations to kinfolk across generations. In societies or groups characterised by familism, family needs and values often take precedence over individual desires and ambitions. This can involve providing emotional, social, and economic support to family members, maintaining frequent contact, and participating in family traditions and events. Familism is often a strong cultural value in many collectivist societies and can play a significant role in shaping social behaviour, decision-making, and individual identities. The strength of familistic ties can provide a sense of belonging, security, and mutual aid among family members, but it can also sometimes create obligations that may conflict with individual autonomy or broader societal norms.
A family is a group of individuals related to one another by blood ties, marriage, or adoption who form an economic unit, the adult members of which are responsible for the upbringing of children. All known societies involve some form of family system, although the nature of family relationships is widely variable across cultures and throughout history. While in modern societies the main family form is often considered the nuclear family (a couple and their dependent children), a variety of extended family relationships (including grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins) are also frequently found and play important roles in individuals' lives. The family serves as a primary agent of socialisation, providing emotional support, care, and a sense of belonging for its members. It also plays a crucial role in the transmission of cultural norms, values, and traditions across generations.
Family_And_Kinship_Aggregate encompasses the fundamental social units organised around biological relationships, marriage bonds, adoption ties, and chosen kinship connections that serve as primary sites of socialisation, emotional support, and cultural transmission. These object aggregates represent the most basic and universal forms of human social organisation, providing essential functions including child-rearing, economic cooperation, emotional support, and the intergenerational transmission of culture, values, and resources. The diversity within this domain reflects different cultural approaches to organizing kinship relationships and family structures, from traditional extended family systems to contemporary chosen families. These aggregates demonstrate how humans create lasting social bonds that transcend individual lifespans, establish patterns of mutual obligation and support, and maintain continuity across generations through both biological and social reproduction.
Family of choice refers to people with or without legal or blood ties who feel they belong together and wish to define themselves as a family, often based on shared values, mutual support, and emotional closeness. This concept recognises that family bonds can be formed through affinity and shared experiences, rather than solely through biological or legal connections. For individuals who may be estranged from their biological families or who find their primary source of emotional support and belonging elsewhere, families of choice can provide a vital sense of community and kinship. These chosen families can be particularly important for marginalised groups, such as LGBTQ+ individuals, who may face rejection or lack of acceptance from their families of origin. The increasing recognition of diverse family structures in modern society highlights the importance of emotional bonds and mutual commitment in defining what constitutes a family.
A family unit is a social group of two or more people, related by blood, marriage, or adoption, who usually live together in the same household and often share economic resources and responsibilities. This is a fundamental social institution in most societies, providing a context for socialisation, emotional support, and the care of its members, particularly children. The structure of the family unit can vary across cultures and over time, with the nuclear family (a couple and their dependent children) being the most common form in many Western industrialised societies, while extended families (including other relatives like grandparents, aunts, and uncles) are more prevalent in other parts of the world. The family unit plays a crucial role in the transmission of cultural norms and values from one generation to the next.
Family violence encompasses emotional, physical, or sexual abuse of one family member by another, occurring within the context of intimate relationships or familial ties. This can include violence between spouses or partners, parents and children, siblings, or other relatives living in the same household or having close relationships. Family violence is a significant social problem with serious consequences for the well-being and safety of its victims, including physical injuries, psychological trauma, and even death. It is often rooted in power imbalances and can be perpetuated by social norms, economic stressors, and individual factors. Addressing family violence requires a multi-faceted approach involving legal protection for victims, support services, and efforts to change societal attitudes and behaviours that condone or enable abuse within families.
Fashion refers to a social pattern in clothing, accessories, footwear, hairstyles, or behaviour that is favoured for a time by a large number of people within a particular culture or subculture. It is a dynamic and ever-changing phenomenon influenced by social, cultural, economic, and technological factors. Fashion can reflect current trends, social status, and individual identity, and it often involves a process of adoption, diffusion, and eventual obsolescence as new styles emerge. It is a form of collective behaviour that can be driven by designers, celebrities, media, and peer influence. The study of fashion in sociology examines its role in social differentiation, group affiliation, and the expression of cultural values. Trends in fashion can spread rapidly through modern communication channels, creating a sense of shared identity among those who adopt them.
The feminisation of poverty is the trend by which women represent an increasing proportion of the poor population, both in developed and developing countries. This phenomenon is often attributed to a combination of factors, including gender inequalities in the labor market (such as the gender pay gap and occupational segregation), the disproportionate burden of unpaid care work that women often shoulder, higher rates of single-parenthood among women, and discriminatory laws and social norms that limit women's access to resources and opportunities. The feminisation of poverty highlights the intersection of gender and economic inequality, underscoring the need for policies and interventions that address the specific challenges and vulnerabilities faced by women in poverty.
Fertility refers to the incidence of child-bearing in a country's population, typically measured by the number of live births within a specific period, often a year, in relation to the population size or the number of women of childbearing age. Demographers study fertility rates to understand population growth and change, as well as the social, economic, and cultural factors that influence people's decisions about having children. Factors affecting fertility rates can include levels of education and economic development, access to contraception and family planning services, cultural norms and religious beliefs about family size, the status of women in society, and government policies related to child care and parental leave. Fertility rates vary significantly across different countries and regions and have been declining in many parts of the world in recent decades.
The term "First World" historically referred to the group of nation-states that possessed mature industrialised economies, based primarily on capitalistic production and aligned with the Western bloc during the Cold War era. These countries typically had high levels of economic development, technological advancement, and democratic political systems. The concept originated in the context of the Cold War division of the world into three "worlds": the First World (Western industrialised nations), the Second World (communist and socialist states), and the Third World (developing countries). While the Cold War context has ended, the term "First World" is sometimes still used, though often critically, to refer to highly developed, wealthy nations with strong economies and high standards of living. However, its continued use can be problematic as it implies a hierarchy and can overlook the diversity and complexities within and between these nations. More neutral terms like "developed countries" or "high-income countries" are often preferred in contemporary sociological and economic discourse.
Flexible production is a process in which computers and advanced technologies are used to design and produce customised products for a mass market, allowing for greater variety and responsiveness to consumer demand. This contrasts with traditional mass production systems like Fordism, which focused on producing large quantities of standardised goods. Flexible production systems often involve computer-aided design (CAD), computer-aided manufacturing (CAM), and robotics, enabling manufacturers to quickly adapt production lines to create different versions of a product or even entirely new products with relatively low switching costs. This approach allows for greater product differentiation and the ability to cater to niche markets, enhancing competitiveness in a globalised economy. Flexible production requires a skilled and adaptable workforce capable of working with advanced technologies.
Focused interaction refers to interaction between two or more individuals who are engaged in a common activity or a direct conversation with one another, characterised by mutual attention and a shared focus. This type of interaction involves a heightened level of awareness of the other participants and a mutual engagement in the interaction. Examples of focused interaction include a group of people playing a game, students working together on a project, or two friends having a conversation. Sociologist Erving Goffman's work on face-to-face interaction extensively explored the dynamics of focused encounters, highlighting the rules and norms that govern how individuals engage with each other in these situations. Focused interaction is essential for building relationships, sharing information, and achieving collective goals.
Folkway are informal norms governing everyday social behaviour whose violation raises comparatively little concern or mild social sanctions, such as disapproval or polite correction. These are the customs and conventions of daily life that guide routine interactions and contribute to social order. Examples of folkways include table manners, appropriate dress for certain occasions, and general politeness in social interactions. While violating a folkway might lead to social awkwardness or mild disapproval, it typically does not result in severe punishment or formal legal sanctions. Folkway are learned through socialisation and vary across cultures and social groups. They represent the unwritten rules that make social life predictable and comfortable.
Fordism is an economic system based on mass assembly-line production, mass consumption, and standardised commodities, pioneered by Henry Ford in the early 20th century. Key features of Fordism include the use of specialised labor performing repetitive tasks on an assembly line, the production of large quantities of uniform products, and the payment of relatively high wages to workers to enable mass consumption of these goods. This system led to significant increases in productivity and made consumer goods more affordable, contributing to the rise of a mass consumer society. However, Fordism has also been criticised for its dehumanizing aspects due to the repetitive nature of the work and its lack of flexibility in responding to changing consumer preferences. The post-Fordist era is characterised by a shift towards more flexible production methods and diversified consumer markets.
Formal_And_Voluntary_Organisation represents structured collective entities that individuals join voluntarily to pursue specific shared goals, interests, or advocacy objectives. These organisations are characterised by formal membership structures, elected leadership, and explicit purposes that often involve influencing policy, providing services, or advancing particular causes. They typically operate through democratic processes and collective decision-making, with members contributing time, resources, or expertise toward common objectives. The aggregates within this category demonstrate how individuals organise collectively to amplify their voice, pool resources, and achieve goals that would be difficult to accomplish individually. These organisations serve as crucial intermediaries between individual citizens and larger institutional structures, facilitating democratic participation and social change through organised collective action.
Formal norms are norms that generally have been written down and that specify strict rules for behaviour, often with clearly defined sanctions or punishments for violators. These norms are typically codified into laws, regulations, organisational rules, and codes of conduct, and they are enforced by formal authorities or institutions, such as the legal system, government agencies, and organisations. Examples of formal norms include traffic laws, criminal codes, university regulations, and workplace policies. Violations of formal norms can result in a range of penalties, from fines and suspension to imprisonment or termination of employment, depending on the severity of the infraction and the specific rules in place. Formal norms provide a clear and explicit framework for expected behaviour and help to maintain social order and control in complex societies and organisations.
A formal organisation is a special-purpose group designed and structured for maximum efficiency in achieving specific goals or objectives. These organisations are characterised by a hierarchical structure of authority, a clear division of labor based on specialised roles and responsibilities, formal rules and procedures governing operations, and impersonal relationships among members. Examples of formal organisations include corporations, government agencies, universities, and hospitals. Max Weber's concept of bureaucracy is a classic example of a formal organisation designed for rational and efficient goal attainment. The formal structure of these organisations aims to ensure coordination, accountability, and predictability in their operations, although it can sometimes lead to rigidity and a lack of flexibility.
Formal social control refers to the mechanisms and processes used by authorised agents and institutions within society to maintain order, enforce laws, and ensure conformity to established norms and rules. These agents include police officers, judges, school administrators, employers, and other individuals who have been given the authority to enforce social norms and impose sanctions when violations occur. Formal social control is characterised by its reliance on written rules, laws, and regulations, as well as established procedures for identifying and punishing deviant behaviour. Examples of formal social control mechanisms include arrests, prosecutions, disciplinary actions, and legal penalties. It plays a crucial role in maintaining social stability and protecting societal values and interests, often working in conjunction with informal social control mechanisms, such as social disapproval and peer pressure.
Functionalism is a theoretical perspective in sociology based on the notion that social events, institutions, and norms can best be explained in terms of the functions they perform – that is, the contributions they make to the continuity, stability, and overall well-being of a society. It views society as a complex system analogous to a living organism, where various interdependent parts work in a relatively stable relationship to each other, each fulfilling a specific role or function that is necessary for the whole to operate effectively. Functionalists seek to understand how different social structures, such as the family, education, religion, and the economy, contribute to the maintenance of social order and cohesion. This perspective emphasises the importance of shared values, norms, and consensus in society and how these contribute to social equilibrium. When examining social phenomena, functionalists ask what role that phenomenon plays in the larger social system and what its consequences are for the maintenance of social stability.
The functionalist perspective is a sociological approach that emphasises the way that the various parts of a society are structured to maintain its overall stability, order, and equilibrium. This perspective views society as a complex system composed of interconnected institutions, such as the family, education, government, and the economy, each with its own specific functions that contribute to the smooth operation of the whole. Functionalists analyse social phenomena by examining the roles they play in meeting the needs of society and promoting social cohesion. They focus on how shared values, norms, and consensus create a sense of social solidarity and enable society to function effectively. Social change, from a functionalist viewpoint, tends to be gradual and adaptive, occurring in response to disruptions in the social system to restore stability. Key theorists associated with functionalism include Émile Durkheim, Talcott Parsons, and Robert Merton.
Fundamentalism is a belief in returning to the literal, strict, and inerrant meanings of scriptural texts or the foundational doctrines of a religion, often accompanied by a strong emphasis on traditional values and practices. Fundamentalism may arise as a reaction or response to modernisation, secularisation, and rationalisation, which are perceived as threats to religious beliefs and traditional ways of life. It often involves a rejection of more liberal or interpretive approaches to religious texts and a strong insistence on faith-based answers to contemporary issues, defending tradition by appealing to what are considered to be the unchanging and absolute truths found in religious scriptures. Fundamentalist movements can be found across various religions and may manifest in different ways, including social activism, political engagement, and the establishment of separate communities adhering strictly to their religious principles.
Gender refers to the social expectations about behaviour that are regarded as appropriate for the members of each sex within a given culture. It is crucial to understand that gender does not primarily refer to the physical attributes that differentiate men and women biologically (sex), but rather to the socially formed traits of masculinity and femininity, which are learned through socialisation and vary across cultures and time periods. Gender encompasses the roles, norms, and identities that a society assigns to individuals based on their sex, influencing how they are expected to behave, interact, and present themselves. These social expectations shape everything from clothing and hairstyles to occupations and emotional expressions, and they play a significant role in structuring social relationships and hierarchies.
Gender identity is the subjective and internal sense of being a man, a woman, both, neither, or somewhere else along the gender spectrum; it is the deeply felt psychological identification as male, female, or another gender. This is distinct from sex assigned at birth, which is typically based on visible biological characteristics, and gender expression, which is how an individual outwardly presents their gender through clothing, behaviour, and other means. Gender identity is a fundamental aspect of an individual's sense of self and can align with or differ from their sex assigned at birth. The development of gender identity is a complex process influenced by biological, psychological, and social factors. For many individuals, their gender identity is a core part of who they are and how they experience the world.
Gender inequality refers to the differences in the status, power, prestige, opportunities, and resources that women and men have in groups, collectivities, and societies. This inequality is often manifested in various forms, including disparities in economic opportunities and earnings (such as the gender pay gap), political representation and influence, access to education and healthcare, and social and cultural norms that privilege one gender over the other, typically men. Gender inequality is a pervasive issue across many societies, although its specific forms and extent can vary significantly across cultures and historical periods. Feminist theories in sociology aim to understand the social, cultural, and historical roots of gender inequality and to advocate for social change that promotes gender equality and justice.
The gender order is a term associated with the writings of sociologist R. W. Connell that represents the overall patterns of power relations between masculinities and femininities that are widespread throughout society, shaping social institutions, interactions, and individual experiences. It encompasses the dominant cultural beliefs and practices that construct and maintain gender hierarchies, often privileging certain forms of masculinity while subordinating femininities and marginalised masculinities. The gender order is not static but is constantly being negotiated and contested through social interactions and power struggles. It influences everything from the division of labor in the household and the workplace to cultural representations of gender in media and the ways in which individuals perform their gender identities. Understanding the gender order is crucial for analysing and challenging systemic gender inequalities in society.
Gender performance refers to the ways in which individuals actively 'do gender' through their behaviours, mannerisms, clothing, speech, and other forms of self-expression, thereby enacting and reinforcing societal expectations associated with masculinities and femininities. This concept, often associated with the work of Judith Butler, emphasises that gender is not simply an internal identity but is also constructed and expressed through outward actions and presentations that are shaped by social norms and cultural understandings of what it means to be a man or a woman (or other genders) in a particular context. Gender performance is not necessarily a conscious act of role-playing but rather the ongoing ways in which individuals embody and communicate their gender in everyday life, contributing to the social construction of gender itself.
Gender relations refer to the societally patterned interactions, roles, and power dynamics between men and women, as well as between individuals of other gender identities, within a given society. These relations are shaped by cultural norms, social institutions, economic structures, and historical factors, and they influence various aspects of social life, including family, work, education, politics, and interpersonal relationships. Gender relations are often characterised by inequalities in status, power, and resources, with one gender (typically men in patriarchal societies) holding more privilege and authority than others. The study of gender relations in sociology examines how these power dynamics are constructed, maintained, and challenged, and how they impact individuals and society as a whole. Understanding gender relations is essential for addressing gender-based inequalities and promoting gender equality.
Gender roles are the social roles, behaviours, attitudes, and expectations that are considered appropriate, acceptable, or desirable for people based on their perceived sex or gender within a particular culture or society. These roles are often labeled as masculine or feminine and are learned through the process of socialisation from a young age, influenced by family, peers, education, media, and other social institutions. Gender roles can vary significantly across different cultures and can change over time within the same society. While they provide a framework for social interaction and can contribute to a sense of identity, they can also be restrictive and contribute to gender stereotypes and inequalities by limiting individuals' opportunities and expressions based on societal expectations of their gender. The study of gender roles in sociology examines how they are constructed, maintained, and challenged, and their impact on individuals and social structures.
Gender stratification refers to a society's unequal distribution of wealth, power, and privilege between the two sexes, with one gender (typically men) holding a disproportionate share of these resources and social advantages. This hierarchical arrangement is evident in various aspects of social life, including the economic sphere (e.g., the gender pay gap, occupational segregation), the political arena (e.g., underrepresentation of women in leadership positions), and social institutions (e.g., differential treatment in education and healthcare). Gender stratification is not simply a matter of individual differences but is embedded in the social structure and perpetuated by cultural norms, beliefs, and practices that often favour men and disadvantage women. Feminist theories in sociology critically examine the causes and consequences of gender stratification and advocate for social equality between the sexes.
Generalised others is a term used by social psychologist George Herbert Mead to refer to the child's developing awareness of the attitudes, viewpoints, expectations, and norms of society as a whole, which the child gradually takes into account in his or her behaviour. This concept is a key part of Mead's theory of the social self, explaining how individuals develop a sense of self through social interaction. As children mature, they move beyond understanding the expectations of specific individuals (like parents) to understanding the broader expectations of their community and society. This internalised understanding of the generalised other allows individuals to regulate their behaviour according to societal norms and to anticipate how others might respond to their actions, even in interactions with unfamiliar people. The ability to take the perspective of the generalised other is essential for becoming a fully socialised member of society.
Genocide is the deliberate, systematic killing of an entire people, nation, ethnic group, or other distinct group of people, with the intent to destroy the group in whole or in part. It is considered the most extreme form of intergroup intolerance and a grave violation of human rights. Genocide can involve various methods of extermination, including mass killings, forced displacement leading to death, the imposition of measures intended to prevent births within the group, and the forcible transfer of children of the group to another group. The Holocaust, in which Nazi Germany systematically murdered approximately six million Jews, is a well-known historical example of genocide. Other instances include the treatment of aboriginal Australians by white settlers and the European colonisation of North America, which led to a drastic decline in Native American populations, partly due to the introduction of European diseases. The ongoing conflict in the Darfur region of Sudan has also been cited as a contemporary example of genocide. The prevention and punishment of genocide are major concerns of international law and human rights efforts.
Gentrification is a process of urban renewal in which older, decaying housing and neighborhoods in central city areas are refurbished and revitalised by more affluent people, often resulting in the displacement of the original, lower-income residents. This process typically involves the renovation of buildings, the influx of new businesses and amenities catering to a higher-income clientele, and an increase in property values and rents, making the area unaffordable for many of its long-term residents. While gentrification can lead to the physical improvement of neglected urban areas, it often raises concerns about social equity and the displacement of vulnerable populations, potentially leading to the loss of affordable housing and the disruption of established communities. The causes and consequences of gentrification are complex and have been a subject of much sociological research and debate, with discussions focusing on issues of urban planning, housing policy, and social justice.
Gerontology is the scientific study of the sociological, psychological, biological, and economic aspects of aging and the problems of older adults. It is an interdisciplinary field that draws on various disciplines to understand the aging process and the experiences of people as they grow older. Social gerontology, a specialised area within gerontology, specifically examines the social (and sociological) aspects of aging, focusing on topics such as social roles, relationships, social inequalities related to age, and the impact of social structures on the aging experience. Researchers in gerontology also study the psychological changes associated with aging, as well as the biological processes of senescence and the economic challenges and opportunities faced by older populations. The field of gerontology plays an increasingly important role in addressing the needs and concerns of aging populations in societies around the world.
Global_And_National_System_Category represents aggregates that describe different types of nation-states and societies within the contemporary global system, characterised by varying levels of economic development, technological advancement, and political power. These categories reflect the hierarchical and unequal nature of the global political and economic system, where different countries occupy distinct positions based on their historical development, resource endowments, and political relationships. They demonstrate how global economic and political processes create systematic differences between societies in terms of their opportunities, constraints, and relationships with other nations. These aggregates are essential for understanding contemporary patterns of global inequality, international relations, and the dynamics of globalisation and development.
Global_Power_Relations_And_Cultural_Policy represents institutional arrangements, policy frameworks, and systematic practices that govern relationships between different cultural, ethnic, and national groups, particularly focusing on how power differentials shape intercultural dynamics and group relationships. This category encompasses both historical systems of domination and contemporary policies designed to address inequality and promote inclusion. These arrangements function as realizable entities that can be implemented through legislation, institutional practices, and social policies, representing different approaches to managing cultural diversity and addressing historical injustices. The category includes both oppressive systems that systematically excluded and marginalised certain groups, as well as remedial policies designed to counteract discrimination and promote greater equity. These mechanisms operate across multiple scales, from domestic policies addressing minority rights and cultural recognition to international systems of economic and political dominance that perpetuate global inequalities. The category recognises that contemporary cultural and racial politics cannot be understood without reference to historical patterns of domination and the ongoing efforts to address their legacies through institutional reform and policy intervention.
Global village is a notion associated with the Canadian writer and media theorist Marshall McLuhan, who envisioned the spread of electronic communication technologies, such as television and later the internet, as binding the world into a single, interconnected community, akin to a small village where everyone knows everyone else and information travels rapidly. McLuhan argued that electronic media collapses time and space, allowing people from different parts of the world to interact and share experiences in real-time, fostering a sense of global interconnectedness and shared consciousness. While the "global village" concept highlights the potential for increased communication and understanding across cultures, it has also been critiqued for overlooking issues of power imbalances, cultural homogenisation, and the digital divide that exists in access to technology and information worldwide.
Global warming refers to the gradual increase in the average temperature of planet Earth, a phenomenon primarily attributed to the enhanced greenhouse effect resulting from human activities. While the greenhouse effect is a natural process where certain gases in the Earth's atmosphere trap the sun's radiation and warm the planet to a habitable temperature, global warming implies an acceleration of this effect due to the increased concentration of heat-trapping gases, such as carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide, released by human actions like the burning of fossil fuels, deforestation, and industrial processes. The potential consequences of unchecked global warming are far-reaching and potentially devastating, including significant changes to the world's climate patterns, leading to more frequent and intense extreme weather events such as floods, droughts, heatwaves, and storms, as well as rising sea levels, disruptions to ecosystems, and threats to human health and well-being. Understanding the causes and impacts of global warming is a critical area of sociological inquiry, as it involves examining the social, economic, and political factors that contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and the ways in which societies can respond to this global challenge through mitigation and adaptation strategies.
Governance refers to the exercise of political, economic, and administrative authority in the management of a country's affairs at all levels, encompassing the ways in which power is used to make and implement decisions, as well as the processes and institutions through which citizens and groups articulate their interests, exercise their legal rights, and mediate their differences. Effective governance involves not only the actions of the government but also the roles and interactions of various other actors, including civil society organisations, the private sector, and international bodies. It encompasses the rule of law, transparency, accountability, participation, and responsiveness, all of which are crucial for ensuring stability, promoting economic development, and protecting human rights within a society. Sociologists study governance to understand how power is distributed and exercised, the effectiveness of different governance structures, and the impact of governance on social and economic outcomes.
Government refers to the regular enactment of policies, decisions, and matters of state by officials within a political apparatus, representing the formal organisation that has the authority to make and enforce laws and regulations within a specific territory or society. It encompasses the various institutions and processes through which a state exercises its power and authority, including legislative bodies that create laws, executive branches that implement and enforce them, and judicial systems that interpret laws and resolve disputes. Governments play a crucial role in maintaining social order, providing public services, regulating the economy, and representing the interests of the state in its interactions with other nations. The form and structure of government can vary widely, ranging from democracies to authoritarian regimes, each with different mechanisms for the selection of officials and the exercise of power. Political sociology examines the role of government in society, its relationship with citizens and other social institutions, and the factors that influence its policies and actions.
Government and Politics represent a fundamental social institution and a central field of study within sociology and political science. This domain examines the complex ways in which power is exercised, organised, and legitimised within societies. It encompasses the state, its various governmental institutions, and the processes through which public policies are formulated, implemented, and enforced. Key areas include the analysis of different political systems (e.g., democracies, monarchies, authoritarian regimes), the distribution of power among various social groups (e.g., the power elite), the role of authority (traditional, charismatic, legal-rational), and the mechanisms of governance at local, national, and global levels. Political sociology also investigates political socialisation, political behaviour, public sphere dynamics, and how political structures influence social inequality and social change, and how citizens engage with or are controlled by political apparatuses.
Grand theories in sociology are ambitious theoretical frameworks that attempt to provide an overall explanation of social life, social development, and the fundamental nature of society as a whole. These theories typically seek to understand the underlying principles and structures that shape human behaviour, social interactions, and the evolution of societies over time. Karl Marx's theory of successive class conflicts as the driving force of history, leading to the eventual overthrow of capitalism and the establishment of a communist society, is a classic example of grand theorizing, attempting to explain the trajectory of human social development through the lens of economic and material forces. Other examples of grand theories include Talcott Parsons's structural functionalism, which views society as a complex system striving for equilibrium, and Immanuel Wallerstein's world-systems theory, which analyses global inequality in terms of a core-periphery model. While grand theories aim to provide comprehensive explanations, they have also been critiqued for being overly abstract, difficult to test empirically, and sometimes too broad to account for the diversity and complexity of social phenomena.
The greenhouse effect is the build-up of heat-trapping gases, such as carbon dioxide, methane, and water vapor, within the Earth's atmosphere, which acts like the glass roof of a greenhouse, allowing sunlight to enter and warm the planet but preventing some of the heat from escaping back into space. This natural process is essential for keeping the Earth's temperature at a level that can support life. However, the term 'greenhouse effect' is often used in the context of global warming to refer to an enhanced greenhouse effect resulting from the build-up of high concentrations of greenhouse gases due to human activities, primarily the burning of fossil fuels for energy, deforestation, and industrial processes. This increase in greenhouse gases traps more heat in the atmosphere, leading to a rise in the Earth's average temperature, a phenomenon known as global warming, which has significant implications for climate patterns, sea levels, and ecosystems worldwide.
Greying is a term used in sociology and demography to indicate that an increasing proportion of a society's population is becoming elderly, typically defined as those aged 65 and over. This demographic shift is occurring in many countries around the world due to factors such as declining birth rates and increasing life expectancy, resulting in a larger percentage of the population being in older age groups. The greying of society has significant social, economic, and healthcare implications, including increased demands on pension systems, healthcare services, and social support networks, as well as potential changes in the labor force and economic productivity. It also raises questions about social roles, intergenerational relations, and the ways in which societies can adapt to the needs and contributions of an aging population.
In sociology, a group is defined as any number of people with similar norms, values, and expectations who interact with one another on a regular basis, developing a sense of shared identity and belonging. The size of a group can range from a small dyad (two people) to large-scale organisations or even broader social categories. What distinguishes a group from a mere collection of individuals is the presence of ongoing social interaction, shared norms and values that guide behaviour, and a sense of mutual awareness and interdependence among members. Groups play a fundamental role in social life, providing individuals with social support, a sense of identity, and a context for social interaction and the development of social norms. Sociologists study groups to understand group dynamics, social influence, conformity, leadership, and the ways in which groups shape individual behaviour and social structures.
Growth rate in demography refers to the annual change in the size of a population, expressed as a percentage. It is calculated by taking the difference between the number of births and deaths (natural increase) and adding the difference between the number of immigrants entering and emigrants leaving a population (net migration), all per 1,000 population. A positive growth rate indicates that the population is increasing, while a negative rate signifies a decrease. This measure is crucial for understanding population dynamics and planning for future resource needs in areas such as infrastructure, education, and healthcare. Factors influencing growth rate include fertility rates, mortality rates, and migration patterns, which are in turn affected by social, economic, and environmental conditions.
A hate crime is a criminal act committed against a person or their property that is motivated, in whole or in part, by the offender's bias against a race, religion, ethnic or national origin, disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity. These crimes are distinct because they target individuals or groups based on their membership in a protected category, sending a message of fear and intimidation to the broader community that shares that characteristic. Hate crimes can range from vandalism and harassment to physical assault and even homicide, and they are often prosecuted with more severe penalties than similar crimes that are not motivated by bias due to their particularly harmful impact on victims and society. Recognizing and addressing hate crimes is an important aspect of promoting social justice and protecting the rights and safety of all individuals within a community.
The Hawthorne effect is a phenomenon in research where a change in a subject's behaviour occurs simply because they are aware of being studied or observed, rather than due to any specific manipulation or intervention introduced by the researchers. This effect was first observed during a series of industrial experiments conducted at the Hawthorne Works factory of Western Electric in the 1920s and 1930s, where researchers found that workers' productivity increased not only in response to changes in working conditions (like lighting) but also when changes were reversed or even when no changes were made, seemingly because the workers were aware they were being observed and were responding to the attention they were receiving. The Hawthorne effect poses a challenge for researchers as it can confound the results of studies if participants' awareness of being studied influences their behaviour in unintended ways, making it difficult to determine the true effect of the independent variable. Researchers often try to minimise the Hawthorne effect through various methodological strategies, such as using blind or double-blind study designs or by observing participants unobtrusively.
As defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO), health is a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being, and not merely the absence of disease and infirmity. This definition emphasises a holistic view of health that goes beyond just the absence of illness to include the overall quality of an individual's physical, psychological, and social functioning and resources. It recognises that health is influenced by a complex interplay of biological, psychological, social, economic, and environmental factors. Achieving and maintaining health requires attention to all these dimensions and involves promoting well-being in all aspects of life. This broad definition underscores the sociological perspective on health, which examines how social factors shape health outcomes and inequalities within and between populations.
Health maintenance organisations (HMOs) are a type of managed healthcare organisation that provides comprehensive medical services to its enrolled members for a preestablished fee, typically paid on a monthly basis, regardless of how often the services are used. HMOs aim to control healthcare costs by emphasizing preventive care and requiring members to choose a primary care physician (PCP) who acts as a gatekeeper, coordinating their care and providing referrals to specialists when necessary. HMOs often have a network of doctors, hospitals, and other healthcare providers that members must use to receive coverage, except in cases of emergency. While HMOs can help to make healthcare more affordable and predictable in terms of cost, they have also been criticised for potentially limiting patients' choice of providers and sometimes prioritizing cost-cutting over the quality of care.
Healthcare, in sociology, refers to the social institution and complex system of organisations, professionals, and practices dedicated to maintaining and improving the physical, mental, and social well-being of individuals and populations. This domain encompasses a wide range of services, including medical diagnosis and treatment, disease prevention, health promotion, rehabilitation, and palliative care. Sociologists examine the social determinants of health and illness, investigating how factors like socioeconomic status, race, gender, and geographic location influence health disparities and access to care. The study of healthcare also analyses the social organisation of medical practices, the roles of healthcare providers and patients, the social construction of health and illness (e.g., the sick role), and the impact of health maintenance organisations (HMOs) and holistic medicine approaches. It critically assesses healthcare policies, inequalities in health outcomes, and the broader societal implications of health and disease.
Hegemonic masculinity refers to the dominant or main ways of being a man in a society that are widely accepted and often idealised, shaping societal expectations and norms for male behaviour and identity. This concept, developed by sociologist R. W. Connell, describes a culturally idealised form of masculinity that is often associated with characteristics such as strength, independence, rationality, emotional control, and heterosexuality, and which often positions men in positions of power and authority over women and other marginalised masculinities. Hegemonic masculinity is not necessarily practiced by the majority of men but rather represents a culturally dominant ideal that influences how masculinity is understood and performed in society, often setting standards against which other forms of masculinity are measured and sometimes devalued. It is a dynamic and evolving concept that varies across cultures and historical periods.
Hegemony, in a sociological context, refers to the means by which a ruling or dominant group wins over a subordinate group through ideas, values, beliefs, and cultural norms, rather than primarily through force or coercion. This concept, often associated with the work of Antonio Gramsci, describes a process where the dominant group's ideology becomes widely accepted as common sense or the natural order of things, even by those who are disadvantaged by it, thereby maintaining the dominant group's power and control. Hegemony operates by shaping people's perceptions, preferences, and understandings of the world in ways that support the status quo. It is a subtle form of power that works through cultural influence and the shaping of consciousness, making social inequalities seem legitimate or inevitable.
The hidden curriculum refers to the unstated or subtle standards of behaviour, attitudes, values, and beliefs that are deemed proper by society and are taught implicitly in schools through the everyday practices, routines, and social interactions within the educational environment, rather than through the formal academic curriculum. This can include learning about punctuality, obedience to authority, competition, conformity to rules, and the importance of social hierarchies. The hidden curriculum plays a significant role in the socialisation of students, shaping their understanding of social norms, expectations, and power dynamics in ways that may not be explicitly stated but are nonetheless influential in preparing them for their roles in the broader society and the workplace. Sociologists study the hidden curriculum to understand how schools contribute to the reproduction of social inequalities and the transmission of dominant cultural values.
Historical and Cultural Context refers to the specific historical periods, social conditions, and cultural settings that profoundly influence and shape social phenomena, human behaviour, and the meanings individuals attach to their experiences within a society. This meta-category emphasises that sociological concepts and social realities are not universal or static but are deeply embedded in and understood through the lens of their unique historical trajectories and prevailing cultural norms, values, beliefs, and practices. For example, concepts like colonialism, underdevelopment, modernisation, and globalisation can only be fully grasped by considering the historical eras and cultural frameworks in which they occurred and continue to evolve. This contextual understanding helps to explain the diversity of social structures, institutions, and processes across different societies and over time, highlighting how past events and cultural legacies shape present social realities and future possibilities.
Holistic medicine is an approach to health maintenance and healthcare that uses therapies in which the healthcare practitioner considers the whole person – their physical, mental, emotional, social, and spiritual characteristics – rather than focusing solely on the physical symptoms of an illness. This approach emphasises the interconnectedness of these different aspects of well-being and aims to treat the root causes of illness by addressing the individual's overall health and lifestyle. Holistic practitioners may use a variety of therapeutic modalities, including lifestyle changes, stress reduction techniques, nutritional guidance, exercise programs, and complementary and alternative therapies, in addition to conventional medical treatments, to promote healing and well-being. The focus is on treating the individual as a whole and empowering them to take an active role in their own health and healing process.
Homophobia refers to the fear of and prejudice against homosexuality, as well as individuals who identify as gay, lesbian, or bisexual. It encompasses a range of negative attitudes, beliefs, and discriminatory behaviours directed towards homosexual people, often rooted in societal norms, religious beliefs, and misconceptions about sexual orientation. Homophobia can manifest in various forms, from subtle expressions of disapproval or discomfort to overt acts of discrimination, harassment, and violence. It can have significant negative impacts on the mental health, social well-being, and safety of LGBTQ+ individuals, leading to feelings of isolation, anxiety, and fear. Challenging homophobia involves promoting understanding, acceptance, and equality for all individuals regardless of their sexual orientation through education, advocacy, and legal protections.
Homosexuality is an orientation of sexual activities, romantic feelings, and emotional attraction towards others of the same sex or gender. It is one of the three main categories of sexual orientation, alongside heterosexuality (attraction to the opposite sex or gender) and bisexuality (attraction to more than one gender). Homosexuality is a natural variation of human sexuality and has been documented across different cultures and throughout history. It is not a mental illness or a lifestyle choice but rather a fundamental aspect of an individual's identity. The understanding and social acceptance of homosexuality have evolved over time, and LGBTQ+ rights movements have advocated for equal rights and protections for homosexual individuals and couples in many parts of the world.
Horizontal mobility refers to the movement of an individual from one social position to another of the same rank or social status within the social hierarchy. This type of mobility involves a change in occupation, job, or social role that does not result in a significant upward or downward shift in terms of prestige, power, or income. For example, a teacher moving from one school to another, or a nurse changing hospitals, would be considered horizontal mobility, as their occupational status and social standing remain relatively the same. Horizontal mobility is a common occurrence in modern societies and reflects changes in individuals' careers or life circumstances without necessarily altering their position within the broader social stratification system.
Horticultural societies are preindustrial societies in which people plant seeds and cultivate crops rather than relying solely on foraging for naturally available foods. These societies typically use simple hand tools, such as hoes and digging sticks, to cultivate small plots of land for subsistence. Unlike agrarian societies that employ more advanced agricultural technologies like plows and irrigation, horticultural societies generally have a lower level of technological development and a less intensive form of agriculture. Horticultural societies often practice slash-and-burn agriculture, where vegetation is cleared and burned to create fertile land for planting, which is then abandoned after a few years as the soil becomes depleted, and the group moves to a new area. These societies tend to be more settled than hunter-gatherer societies but may still exhibit some degree of mobility.
Human ecology is an area of study within sociology and other social sciences that is concerned with the interrelationships between people and their spatial setting and physical environment. It examines how social organisation, population dynamics, culture, and technology shape human interactions with the environment and how the environment, in turn, influences social life and human behaviour. Human ecology explores topics such as urbanisation, environmental degradation, resource management, and the impact of environmental changes on human populations and social systems. It emphasises a holistic and systemic approach to understanding the complex connections between human societies and the natural world, recognizing that these are interdependent and mutually influencing systems.
A hunting-and-gathering society is a preindustrial society in which people rely on whatever foods (such as wild fruits, vegetables, nuts, and hunted animals) and fiber are readily available in their natural environment in order to live and sustain themselves. These societies typically have a nomadic or semi-nomadic lifestyle, moving from place to place in search of food and resources as they become seasonally available. They generally have a small population size and a relatively simple social structure with a minimal division of labor, often based on age and sex. Hunting-and-gathering was the primary mode of subsistence for humans throughout most of history, and some relatively isolated groups continue to practice this way of life today. Their survival depends on their knowledge of the local environment and their skills in hunting, fishing, and gathering wild plants.
A hypothesis is an idea, or an educated guess, about a given state of affairs, a potential relationship between two or more variables, or a possible explanation for a phenomenon, put forward in exact and testable terms to provide the basis for empirical testing in research. A good hypothesis is clear, specific, and falsifiable, meaning that it can be tested through observation or experimentation, and it is possible to find evidence that either supports or contradicts it. Hypotheses often take the form of a statement predicting how one variable (the independent variable) will affect another variable (the dependent variable). The process of formulating and testing hypotheses is central to the scientific method in sociology and other disciplines, allowing researchers to systematically investigate social phenomena and build evidence-based knowledge.
Ideal Culture refers to the norms, values, beliefs, and practices that a society outwardly professes, publicly endorses, and explicitly strives to uphold as its standards for behaviour and social life. It represents the idealised version of a society's culture, encompassing the goals, aspirations, and moral principles that are formally taught, celebrated, and often enshrined in laws and official documents. Ideal culture provides a set of guidelines for how people should behave and what they should value. However, it often stands in contrast to "real culture," which refers to the actual social patterns and behaviours observed in everyday life that may deviate from or only partially approximate these idealised expectations. The discrepancy between ideal and real culture can be a source of social tension, hypocrisy, or calls for social change, as individuals and groups navigate the gap between espoused ideals and lived realities.
An ideal type is a conceptual construct or model that serves as a measuring rod or analytical tool against which specific cases can be evaluated and compared. The concept was developed by Max Weber, who emphasised that an ideal type is not meant to represent a perfect or desirable state, nor is it a statistical average of real-world cases. Instead, it is a deliberately constructed analytical abstraction that exaggerates certain features of a social phenomenon to highlight its essential characteristics and to provide a framework for understanding variations and similarities in empirical cases. For example, Weber's ideal type of bureaucracy outlines the key characteristics of a perfectly rational and efficient bureaucratic organisation, which can then be used to analyse and compare real-world bureaucracies that may deviate from this ideal in various ways. Ideal types are valuable tools for sociological analysis, helping researchers to clarify concepts, identify patterns, and develop theoretical insights.
Identity refers to the distinctive characteristics of a person's character or the character of a group which relate to who they are and what is meaningful to them, providing a sense of self and belonging. Some of the main sources of identity include gender, encompassing social expectations of masculinity and femininity; sexual orientation, referring to patterns of emotional, romantic, and sexual attraction; nationality or ethnicity, based on shared cultural heritage, origin, and often language or religion; and social class, reflecting one's position in the socioeconomic hierarchy. Identity is not fixed but is fluid and can evolve over an individual's life course through interactions with others and within different social contexts. It shapes how individuals perceive themselves and how they are perceived by others, influencing their social interactions, opportunities, and experiences within society.
Identity and Self constitutes a central sociological and social psychological domain focusing on how individuals develop, perceive, and express their unique sense of who they are, and how this understanding is shaped by social interactions and broader societal influences. This area examines the self as a social construct, exploring the processes through which individuals become self-aware and form their personal identity (self-identity), encompassing their conscious perceptions, thoughts, feelings, and beliefs about themselves. Key concepts include George Herbert Mead's theory of the social self, which differentiates between the "I" (the spontaneous, acting self) and the "me" (the socialised self, reflecting internalised societal perspectives, including those of significant others and the generalised other). This domain also delves into various facets of identity, such as gender identity, sexual orientation, personality, and the impact of social roles, experiences, and social groups (in-groups, out-groups) on self-concept. It explores how individuals manage their self-presentation through impression management and face-work in social interactions.
Identity_Formation_And_Role_Development_Process represents the dynamic mechanisms through which individuals develop, maintain, modify, and transition between social identities and roles throughout their lives. These processes involve both the internal psychological work of self-definition and the external social processes of role acquisition and performance. Self-identity formation involves the ongoing construction of personal identity through social interaction and self-reflection. Role-taking enables individuals to understand and adopt different social perspectives, facilitating effective social interaction and empathy. Anticipatory socialisation allows individuals to prepare for future roles and social positions before actually occupying them. Role exit involves the complex process of disengaging from established roles and reconstructing identity. Ageing encompasses the broader life course changes that affect identity and role transitions over time. These processes demonstrate the fluid and dynamic nature of social identity, showing how individuals actively construct and reconstruct their sense of self in response to changing social circumstances and life transitions.
Immigration is the movement of people into one country from another with the intention of settling permanently or for an extended period. This cross-border migration can occur for a variety of reasons, including seeking better economic opportunities, escaping poverty, conflict, or persecution, joining family members, or pursuing education and personal development. Immigration has significant social, economic, and cultural impacts on both the sending and receiving countries, contributing to population growth and diversity, influencing labor markets, and shaping cultural landscapes. The experiences of immigrants can vary widely depending on factors such as their reasons for migrating, their skills and resources, the policies and attitudes of the host country, and the presence of established immigrant communities.
Impression management is a term used by sociologist Erving Goffman to refer to the conscious or unconscious altering of the presentation of the self in order to create distinctive appearances and satisfy particular audiences in social interactions. Individuals engage in impression management to control how others perceive them and to project a desired image or definition of the situation. This involves strategically using language, nonverbal cues, behaviour, and props to convey a particular identity or role. Goffman's dramaturgical approach views social life as a performance, and impression management is a key aspect of this performance, as individuals strive to present a "face" that is appropriate to the social context and that will be accepted by others. The goal of impression management can be to gain approval, build trust, assert authority, or achieve other social objectives.
An in-group is any group or category to which people feel they belong and with which they identify, often fostering a sense of loyalty, solidarity, and shared identity among its members. Membership in an in-group can be based on various factors such as shared ethnicity, nationality, religion, social class, occupation, or common interests. Individuals within an in-group often have a sense of "we-ness" and may view members of out-groups (those to whom they do not belong) as different or even oppositional. The distinction between in-groups and out-groups can play a significant role in social dynamics, influencing attitudes, behaviours, and intergroup relations, sometimes leading to in-group favouritism and out-group prejudice.
The incest taboo is a universal or near-universal prohibition of sexual relationships between certain culturally specified relatives, most commonly between parents and their children, and between siblings. While the specific definition of which relatives are included in the taboo can vary across cultures, the prohibition against sexual relations within the immediate family is widespread. The incest taboo serves several important social functions, including preventing genetic defects that can result from inbreeding, maintaining clarity in family roles and boundaries, promoting exogamy (marriage outside the family) and the formation of broader social alliances, and reducing sexual competition and conflict within the family unit. The strength and enforcement of the incest taboo vary across societies, but it remains a fundamental norm in virtually all cultures.
Incidence, in the context of social science and public health research, refers to the number of new cases of a specific disorder, disease, condition, or event occurring within a given population during a stated period of time, often expressed as a rate per a certain number of people (e.g., per 1,000 or 100,000 population per year). Incidence provides a measure of the risk of developing a new case of the condition within the specified time frame and is useful for understanding the spread and trends of various social or health phenomena. It is distinct from prevalence, which refers to the total number of cases (both new and existing) of a condition present in a population at a particular point in time or during a specific period. Monitoring incidence rates can help researchers and policymakers identify emerging social problems or health issues and evaluate the effectiveness of prevention efforts.
Individual_Development_And_Interaction_Theory focus on micro-level processes involving individual cognitive development, social interaction, and the relationship between biology, language, and behaviour. These theories examine how individuals develop cognitively and socially throughout their lives, from Piaget's developmental stages to aging theories like disengagement theory. Symbolic interactionism emphasises how individuals create meaning through social interaction and shared symbols. The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis explores how language shapes thought and perception, while sociobiology investigates biological foundations of social behaviour. Cornucopian theory represents optimistic views of human adaptability and innovation, and multiple-nuclei theory examines urban development patterns from a more localised perspective. Despite their diversity, these theories share an emphasis on individual-level processes, whether cognitive, linguistic, biological, or interactional, and how these micro-level phenomena contribute to broader social patterns and human adaptation to environmental challenges.
Inductive logical thought is a reasoning process that involves transforming specific observations, empirical findings, or particular instances into broader generalisations, general theories, or abstract principles. It moves from the specific to the general, where patterns, similarities, or regularities observed in individual cases are used to formulate more encompassing conclusions or hypotheses about a larger population or phenomenon. For example, if a researcher observes that in several instances, increased levels of education are associated with higher income, they might use inductive reasoning to develop a general theory suggesting a positive relationship between education and income in the broader population. Inductive reasoning is a fundamental approach in empirical research, where data collection and analysis of specific cases often serve as the foundation for building sociological theories and understanding social patterns. While inductive conclusions are based on evidence, they are probabilistic rather than certain, as there is always the possibility that future observations might not fit the established pattern.
An industrial city is a type of urban center characterised by its relatively large size and population density, a dynamic and often competitive environment, a more open class system compared to pre-industrial societies, and a significant level of elaborate specialisation in the manufacturing of goods and the provision of related services. These cities emerged and grew rapidly during the Industrial Revolution, becoming centers of production, innovation, and migration, attracting large numbers of people seeking employment in factories and related industries. The social structure of industrial cities often reflects a greater degree of social mobility based on achieved status compared to more traditional, agrarian-based societies. However, they can also be characterised by social inequalities and challenges associated with rapid urbanisation, such as overcrowding, pollution, and the development of distinct social and economic neighborhoods.
The Industrial Revolution refers to the broad spectrum of profound social and economic transformations that surrounded the development of modern forms of industry, beginning in Great Britain in the late 18th century and spreading to other parts of the world throughout the 19th and 20th centuries. This period was marked by significant technological innovations, particularly the invention of new machines and the use of new energy sources like steam power, which led to the rise of factory-based production and a shift from agrarian-based economies to those dominated by manufacturing and industry. The Industrial Revolution had far-reaching consequences, leading to urbanisation, the growth of new social classes, changes in family structures, and significant alterations in people's daily lives and ways of working. It laid the foundation for modern industrial societies and continues to shape the world today through ongoing technological advancements and their social and economic impacts.
An industrial society is a type of society that depends primarily on mechanisation, advanced technology, and sophisticated machinery powered by advanced energy sources to produce its economic goods and services on a large scale. This form of society emerged with the Industrial Revolution and is characterised by a complex division of labor, a high degree of urbanisation as people move to centers of production, and a reliance on manufacturing and industrial processes rather than agriculture as the main source of economic activity. Industrial societies typically have a more complex social structure with greater social mobility compared to pre-industrial societies, although they can also experience significant social inequalities related to the distribution of wealth and power in the industrial economy. The development of industrial societies has led to significant increases in productivity, material wealth, and standards of living in many parts of the world, but also to new social and environmental challenges.
Industrialism refers to a social and economic system characterised by the extensive use of technology, particularly sophisticated machinery powered by advanced sources of energy such as fossil fuels and electricity, to produce goods and services on a large scale. It is the driving force behind industrial societies, leading to mass production, specialisation of labor, and the growth of factories and urban centers. Industrialism has transformed the way people live and work, leading to unprecedented levels of material wealth and technological progress in many parts of the world. However, it has also brought about social changes, such as the rise of new social classes and new forms of social inequality, as well as environmental challenges related to resource consumption and pollution. The study of industrialism examines its historical development, its social and economic consequences, and its ongoing evolution in the face of new technological innovations and global challenges.
Inequality Concepts serve as a meta-category for the abstract ideas, theoretical constructs, and analytical frameworks that sociologists use to understand, measure, and explain the existence of disparities and unequal distribution of valued resources, opportunities, and power within and across societies. This category groups fundamental concepts that help delineate the nature and dimensions of social stratification and its consequences. Examples include social inequality (the general condition of unequal access), wealth (total assets), income (earnings), prestige (social honor), and power (ability to exert influence). It also encompasses concepts like life chances (opportunities for well-being) and vested interests (groups benefiting from the status quo) that shed light on how inequalities are structured and maintained. These concepts provide the essential vocabulary for analysing how social categories (like class, race, gender, disability) lead to systematic advantages and disadvantages for different groups in society, and for theorizing about the causes, manifestations, and consequences of social stratification and social exclusion.
The infant mortality rate is a key demographic indicator that measures the number of infants who die during the first year of life (before reaching their first birthday) for every 1,000 live births in a given population during a specific time period, typically one year. It is a significant measure of a society's overall health and well-being, reflecting factors such as access to quality healthcare, nutrition, sanitation, and socioeconomic conditions. A high infant mortality rate often indicates poor living conditions, inadequate healthcare, and high levels of poverty, while a low rate generally suggests better health infrastructure, nutrition, and socioeconomic development. Monitoring infant mortality rates is crucial for public health efforts aimed at improving child survival and overall population health.
Influence refers to the exercise of power through a process of persuasion, where one individual or group is able to affect the thoughts, feelings, or behaviours of others without resorting to explicit force or coercion. It relies on the ability to convince or convince others to adopt a particular viewpoint, take a specific action, or support a certain cause through communication, reasoning, and the appeal to shared values or interests. Influence can operate through various channels, including personal relationships, social networks, media, and public discourse. It is a key aspect of social interaction and plays a significant role in shaping social norms, group dynamics, and political processes. Informal norms, which are generally understood rules of behaviour within a group or society but are not precisely recorded or formally enforced, often exert influence on individuals' actions through social expectations and the potential for social approval or disapproval.
Informal Norm are unwritten and unspoken rules or expectations of behaviour that guide everyday social interactions and customs within a society or social group, distinct from formal, codified laws or regulations. These norms are learned implicitly through socialisation, observation, and social interactions, and they are enforced through informal social control mechanisms such as social approval (e.g., smiles, praise) or disapproval (e.g., frowns, gossip, ridicule, ostracism) from family, friends, peers, and community members. Informal norms cover a vast range of social conduct, from manners and etiquette (folkways) to more morally significant customs (mores) that are considered essential for maintaining social order and cohesion. While not legally binding, violations of informal norms can still lead to social discomfort, embarrassment, or exclusion. They play a crucial role in shaping individuals' daily behaviours, maintaining social predictability, and defining acceptable conduct within various social contexts.
Informal relations refer to the personal connections, social networks, and ways of doing things that exist within groups and organisations but are developed on the basis of personal friendships, shared interests, and informal communication, often departing from formally recognised modes of procedure or organisational charts. These informal structures and relationships can significantly influence how work gets done, how information flows, and the overall culture and dynamics of a group or organisation. They can provide social support, facilitate cooperation, and sometimes bypass formal channels to achieve goals more efficiently or to address needs that are not met by the formal structure. However, informal relations can also sometimes lead to the formation of cliques, the spread of rumors, or resistance to formal rules and procedures. Understanding both the formal and informal aspects of social organisation is crucial for a comprehensive sociological analysis of groups and institutions.
Informal social control refers to the ways in which people casually enforce social norms and expectations through everyday interactions and social sanctions, such as laughter, smiles, ridicule, gossip, and expressions of approval or disapproval. This type of social control operates through interpersonal relationships and social pressure within families, peer groups, communities, and other informal social settings. It relies on the desire for social acceptance and the fear of social ostracism to encourage conformity to social norms. While informal social control may not involve formal punishments like legal sanctions, it can be very effective in shaping individual behaviour and maintaining social order at the micro-level of social interaction. The specific forms and effectiveness of informal social control can vary across different cultures and social groups.
Innovation is the process of introducing new elements, ideas, methods, or products into a culture or society, leading to change and often improvement. This can occur through two primary mechanisms: discovery and invention. Discovery involves becoming aware of something that already exists but was previously unknown or unrecognised, such as a new scientific fact or a previously unknown natural resource. Invention, on the other hand, involves creating something entirely new that did not exist before, such as a new technology, a new tool, or a new process. Both discovery and invention can have profound impacts on a culture, leading to new practices, beliefs, social structures, and material advancements. The rate and nature of innovation can vary significantly across different societies and historical periods, influenced by factors such as technological development, cultural values, and social organisation.
Institutional_And_Transformative_Socialisation_Process encompasses intensive socialisation mechanisms that involve systematic transformation of individual identity, often within institutional contexts or through significant life transitions. These processes typically involve more dramatic changes in identity and social position compared to routine socialisation experiences. Resocialisation involves comprehensive transformation of values, norms, and behaviours when individuals enter new social environments with fundamentally different expectations. Degradation ceremonies represent ritualised processes designed to strip away existing identities as part of institutional control mechanisms. Adoption creates new family relationships and identities through legal and social recognition. Self-fulfilling prophecy demonstrates how social expectations can shape individual outcomes and identity formation through dynamic interaction between beliefs and behaviour. These processes highlight the power of social institutions and significant life events to fundamentally reshape individual identity and social relationships, often involving elements of both social control and personal transformation that extend beyond routine socialisation experiences.
Institutional discrimination refers to the denial of opportunities and equal rights to individuals and groups that results from the normal operations of a society's institutions, such as schools, workplaces, healthcare systems, and the legal system, rather than from overt acts of individual prejudice. This form of discrimination is often embedded in established policies, procedures, and practices that may appear neutral on the surface but systematically disadvantage certain groups based on characteristics like race, ethnicity, gender, age, or socioeconomic status. For example, standardised testing in education that is culturally biased may disproportionately disadvantage students from certain minority groups, limiting their access to higher education. Similarly, hiring practices that rely heavily on personal networks may exclude qualified candidates who lack connections to the dominant group within an industry. Institutional discrimination can be subtle and often unintentional, but its cumulative effect can be significant in perpetuating social inequalities.
Instrumentality is a term used by sociologists Talcott Parsons and Robert Bales in their functionalist analysis of social roles, particularly within the family, to refer to an emphasis on tasks, a focus on more distant goals, and a concern for the external relationship between one's family and other social institutions, such as the workplace or the school system. This role is often traditionally associated with the male head of the household in a nuclear family structure, involving responsibilities such as economic provision, decision-making regarding external affairs, and maintaining the family's position within the broader social context. Instrumentality focuses on the practical and goal-oriented aspects of family functioning, ensuring that the family unit can meet its material needs and navigate its interactions with the outside world. Parsons and Bales contrasted instrumentality with expressiveness, which focuses on the emotional well-being and internal harmony of the family.
An interest group is a voluntary association of citizens who come together with the shared goal of attempting to influence public policy in their favour. These groups advocate for specific issues or the interests of their members by lobbying government officials, raising public awareness, and mobilizing support for their cause. Interest groups can represent a wide range of concerns, including economic interests (e.g., business associations, labor unions), social issues (e.g., environmental groups, civil rights organisations), and professional interests (e.g., medical associations, bar associations). They play a significant role in the political process by providing information to policymakers, contributing to political campaigns, and putting pressure on elected officials to support their agendas. The activities of interest groups are a key aspect of understanding how public policy is shaped and the various influences at play in democratic societies.
Intergenerational mobility refers to changes in the social position (typically in terms of occupation, income, or social class) of children relative to their parents. Upward intergenerational mobility occurs when children attain a higher social status than their parents, while downward intergenerational mobility occurs when children experience a decline in social status compared to their parents. The degree of intergenerational mobility in a society is often seen as an indicator of its openness and equality of opportunity. High levels of intergenerational mobility suggest that individuals' social outcomes are less dependent on their family background, while low levels indicate that social status tends to be reproduced across generations. Sociologists study intergenerational mobility to understand the factors that facilitate or hinder social movement between generations and the extent to which individuals can improve their social standing through their own efforts.
The Internet is a global system of interconnected computer networks that allows people to communicate with one another and find information on the Worldwide Web by exchanging data in various forms, including visuals, sounds, and text. This vast network operates in a way that largely transcends the limitations of time, physical space, and the traditional costs and control mechanisms associated with distance and territorial governments. The Internet has become an indispensable tool for communication, education, commerce, entertainment, and social interaction, connecting billions of people around the world and providing access to an unprecedented amount of information and resources. Its decentralised nature and open architecture have fostered innovation and the rapid development of new technologies and applications, transforming many aspects of modern life and contributing to the phenomenon of globalisation.
Interpretative sociology encompasses several approaches to the study of society, including symbolic interactionism and phenomenology, which share a focus on investigating the meaningful character of social life for its participants. This perspective emphasises the importance of understanding the subjective meanings, interpretations, and understandings that individuals and groups bring to their social interactions and how these shape their actions and the social world they inhabit. Interpretative sociologists aim to grasp the lived experiences of people and the ways in which they make sense of their social reality, often using qualitative methods to explore these meanings in depth. Rather than focusing on objective, observable behaviours or large-scale social structures, interpretative sociology delves into the micro-level of social life, seeking to understand the world from the viewpoint of those being studied.
In sociological research, an interview is a method of data collection that involves a series of questions a researcher administers personally to respondents, either face-to-face, by telephone, or through video conferencing. Interviews can be structured, following a predetermined set of questions in a specific order, or unstructured, allowing for more open-ended conversation and exploration of topics. Semi-structured interviews combine elements of both approaches, using an interview guide with key questions but allowing for flexibility in probing responses and exploring related issues that may arise. Interviews are a valuable tool for gathering in-depth qualitative data about individuals' experiences, perspectives, attitudes, and beliefs, providing rich insights into social phenomena that may not be captured by quantitative methods like surveys. The success of an interview depends on the researcher's ability to establish rapport with the respondent, ask clear and unbiased questions, and actively listen to and record their responses accurately.
Intragenerational mobility refers to the movement of an individual up or down a social stratification hierarchy within the course of their own personal career or adult life. This type of social mobility focuses on the changes in a person's social standing, such as their occupation, income, or social class, that occur during their working years, as opposed to intergenerational mobility, which examines changes across generations. For example, an individual who starts their career in a lower-paying job and through promotions and career advancement rises to a higher-level position with increased income and prestige has experienced upward intragenerational mobility. Conversely, someone who experiences job loss or a decline in their career leading to a lower social status has experienced downward intragenerational mobility. The study of intragenerational mobility helps sociologists understand the factors that influence an individual's social trajectory over their lifetime, such as education, skills, career choices, and economic conditions.
Invention is the process of combining existing cultural items, ideas, or technologies into a new form that did not previously exist. It involves creativity and innovation to produce something novel, whether it is a tangible object, a new method, or a new concept. Inventions can range from simple tools to complex technological systems and can have significant impacts on society and culture, leading to social change and the development of new ways of life. Invention is one of the primary drivers of cultural innovation, alongside discovery, which involves becoming aware of something that already exists but was previously unknown. The spread and adoption of inventions within a culture or across societies is a process known as diffusion.
Issei is a term used to refer to the first generation of Japanese immigrants to the United States. These immigrants primarily arrived in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, seeking economic opportunities and a better life. The Issei faced significant challenges, including language barriers, cultural differences, and racial discrimination in their new homeland. They often worked in agriculture, fishing, or small businesses and established close-knit communities to support one another. The experiences of the Issei and their descendants, the Nisei (second generation) and Sansei (third generation), are an important part of the history of immigration and ethnic relations in the United States.
Job insecurity refers to a sense of apprehension, worry, or anxiety experienced by employees about both the stability of their current work position and their future role within the workplace or the broader labor market. This feeling can arise from various factors, such as economic downturns, company restructuring, technological changes leading to automation, globalisation and outsourcing of jobs, or changes in employment contracts and labor laws that reduce job security. High levels of job insecurity can have negative consequences for employees' mental and physical health, job satisfaction, productivity, and overall well-being, as well as impacting their families and communities. It can also affect organisational outcomes, leading to decreased employee loyalty and motivation.
Kinship refers to a social relation that links individuals through blood ties (consanguinity), marriage (affinity), or adoption, forming the basis of family and social organisation in many societies. These relationships define social roles, obligations, and expectations among individuals and groups, influencing patterns of inheritance, residence, and social support. Different cultures have diverse kinship systems that determine how family relationships are recognised and structured, including variations in descent patterns (e.g., patrilineal, matrilineal, bilateral) and the importance placed on different types of relatives. Kinship systems play a fundamental role in shaping social organisation, cultural practices, and individual identities in societies around the world.
Kinship_And_Family_Organisation_System encompasses the fundamental mechanisms through which societies organise familial relationships, trace lineage, and structure intergenerational connections. This class includes both the technical systems for determining kinship affiliation (Descent, Bilateral_Descent) and the cultural values that prioritise family solidarity and obligation (Familism). These systems serve as foundational organizing principles that influence inheritance patterns, social support networks, residence choices, and individual identity formation within family contexts. The variation within this class reflects different cultural solutions to universal human needs for belonging, security, and continuity across generations. Understanding these systems is crucial for analysing how societies balance individual autonomy with collective family responsibilities, and how kinship structures adapt to changing social and economic conditions while maintaining their essential functions.
A knowledge economy is a type of society and economic system where the production, distribution, and use of knowledge and information are the primary drivers of economic growth, wealth creation, and employment, rather than the production of material goods. In a knowledge economy, intellectual capital, innovation, and technological advancements are key resources. Industries such as information technology, biotechnology, education, research and development, and consulting play a central role. The workforce in a knowledge economy typically requires higher levels of education, skills, and adaptability to engage in knowledge-intensive activities. The transition from an industrial economy, based on manufacturing, to a knowledge economy has significant implications for education, employment, and economic policy.
Labeling theory is a sociological approach to understanding deviance that attempts to explain why certain people are viewed and treated as deviants while others engaging in the same behaviour are not. This theory emphasises the role of social reaction and the application of labels in the creation of deviance. It suggests that deviance is not inherent in an act itself but rather is a social construct defined by how society responds to certain behaviours and individuals. When individuals are labeled as deviant by political authorities or other influential groups, this label can become a self-fulfilling prophecy, leading to further deviant behaviour as the labeled individuals internalise the label and are treated accordingly by others. Labeling theory highlights the power of social definitions and the consequences of being labeled as deviant for an individual's identity and life chances.
Labor_Market_And_Economic_Relationship_Model encompasses frameworks that describe different types of employment relationships, labor market structures, and patterns of economic interdependence that emerge within economic systems. These realizable entities focus on how work is organised, how labor markets are structured, and how economic actors relate to one another within broader economic arrangements. They include both formal employment structures and alternative work arrangements, as well as patterns of economic dependence and specialisation that characterise modern economic systems. These models highlight the diversity of ways that societies organise work relationships and the varying degrees of security, autonomy, and opportunity available to different groups of workers. Understanding these models is essential for analysing employment patterns, economic inequality, and the changing nature of work in contemporary economies.
Labour unions are formal organisations of workers who come together to collectively seek to improve their wages, working conditions, benefits, and job security through various strategies, including negotiation with employers (collective bargaining) and the use of tactics such as strikes when necessary. Unions provide a collective voice for workers, aiming to balance the power dynamic between individual employees and employers. They advocate for workers' rights, fair treatment, and safer workplaces. The history and influence of labour unions have played a significant role in shaping labor laws, workplace standards, and the overall distribution of economic power in many countries.
Laissez-faire is a specific form of capitalism under which individuals and businesses compete freely in the marketplace with minimal or no government intervention in the economy. This economic philosophy advocates for a separation of the state from economic affairs, believing that the natural forces of supply and demand, driven by self-interest and competition, will lead to the most efficient allocation of resources and the greatest overall prosperity. In a pure laissez-faire system, the role of government is typically limited to enforcing contracts, protecting private property rights, and maintaining peace and order, without imposing regulations, tariffs, subsidies, or other forms of economic control. The idea is that the "invisible hand" of the market will guide economic activity more effectively than state intervention. While no modern economy operates under a completely laissez-faire system, it remains an influential theoretical model in economic and political thought.
Language is an abstract and complex system of word meanings, symbols, and rules (grammar) that are shared by members of a culture and used for communication and representing all aspects of that culture. It is not limited to spoken or written words but also includes gestures, facial expressions, and other forms of nonverbal communication that convey meaning within a social context. Language is fundamental to human interaction, social organisation, and the transmission of culture from one generation to the next. It shapes how we think, perceive the world, and construct our social reality. The diversity of human languages reflects the rich tapestry of human cultures and the different ways in which societies have developed to understand and interact with their environments.
Latent functions are the unintended or unrecognised functional consequences of a social process, institution, or action that are not explicitly stated or consciously intended by the people involved. This concept, developed by sociologist Robert Merton, contrasts with manifest functions, which are the intended and recognised consequences. Latent functions can be either beneficial or harmful to the social system but are often hidden or less obvious. For example, while the manifest function of schools is to educate students, a latent function might be the development of social networks among students that can be beneficial later in life. Understanding latent functions helps sociologists to gain a more comprehensive analysis of the complexities of social phenomena and the often-unanticipated ways in which they affect society.
Law refers to governmental social control, representing a formal system of rules and regulations enacted and enforced by political authorities to govern behaviour and maintain social order within a society. Laws are typically written down and specify both the behaviours that are prohibited or required and the sanctions or penalties that will be applied when violations occur. The legal system includes various institutions, such as legislatures that create laws, law enforcement agencies that enforce them, and courts that interpret laws and adjudicate disputes. Law plays a crucial role in establishing norms, resolving conflicts, protecting rights, and providing a framework for social interaction in complex societies. The legitimacy and effectiveness of law depend on its acceptance by the people it governs and its consistent and fair application.
Legal-rational authority, as defined by Max Weber, is a type of power made legitimate by law, rules, and regulations that are rationally established and applied impartially. This form of authority is characteristic of modern bureaucratic organisations and states, where power is vested in positions or offices rather than in individuals based on tradition or personal charisma. Obedience is owed to the legally established rules and to those who hold positions of authority within that framework only when they are acting within the scope of those rules. Legal-rational authority emphasises competence, expertise, and adherence to formal procedures, contributing to efficiency and predictability in governance and organisational management. It is a cornerstone of modern democratic societies and bureaucratic structures.
Legitimacy in a political context refers to the widespread acceptance by the people governed that a particular political order, regime, or authority is just, right, and valid, and therefore deserving of their obedience and support. When a political system is seen as legitimate, people are more likely to comply with its laws and decisions voluntarily, leading to greater stability and social order. Legitimacy can be based on various factors, including tradition, charisma of leaders, and adherence to legal-rational principles and democratic processes. The perception of legitimacy is crucial for the effective exercise of power, as it reduces the need for coercion and fosters cooperation between the government and the governed.
Lesbianism refers to homosexual activities, romantic feelings, and emotional attachments between women. It is a form of sexual orientation where women are primarily attracted to other women. Lesbianism, like other forms of homosexuality, is a natural variation of human sexuality and has been part of diverse cultures throughout history. The social visibility and acceptance of lesbianism have varied across time and place, with increasing recognition and advocacy for lesbian rights in many parts of the world in recent decades as part of broader LGBTQ+ rights movements.
Liberal democracy is a system of democracy that combines parliamentary institutions, such as free and fair elections, representative government, and the rule of law, with a commitment to the protection of individual rights and freedoms, coupled with a free market system in the area of economic production. In a liberal democracy, the government's power is limited by a constitution and the separation of powers, and citizens have fundamental rights such as freedom of speech, assembly, and religion. The economic aspect of liberal democracy typically involves a capitalist system with private ownership of property and the means of production, although there may be varying degrees of government regulation and social welfare provisions. This form of government is prevalent in many Western industrialised nations and is characterised by a balance between individual liberties and democratic governance.
Liberation theology is a movement within the church, primarily associated with Roman Catholicism in Latin America, that emphasises the use of religious faith and practice in a political effort to eliminate poverty, discrimination, and other forms of injustice evident in a secular society. It interprets Christian teachings through the lens of the poor and oppressed, advocating for social and economic justice and taking action against systemic inequalities. Liberation theology often involves a critical analysis of social structures and a commitment to working alongside marginalised communities to bring about social change, drawing on biblical themes of liberation and justice. While originating in a religious context, its focus on social justice and the critique of inequality has had broader influence in social and political thought.
Life-span refers to the maximum length of life that is biologically possible for a member of a given species under ideal conditions, representing the theoretical upper limit of longevity for that species. For humans, the life-span is generally considered to be around 120-125 years, although very few individuals actually reach this age. It is distinct from life expectancy, which is the average number of years a person is expected to live in a specific population at a given time. While life expectancy can be influenced by various environmental and social factors, the life-span is thought to be more determined by biological and genetic factors inherent to the species.
Life chances, a concept developed by Max Weber, refer to the opportunities that individuals have to provide themselves with material goods, positive living conditions, and favourable life experiences throughout their lives. These chances are not equally distributed across society but are significantly influenced by an individual's social class, status, and power, as well as other ascribed characteristics such as race, ethnicity, and gender. Weber argued that social stratification creates disparities in life chances, with those in more privileged positions having greater access to resources like education, healthcare, safe housing, and quality employment, which in turn enhance their opportunities for a longer, healthier, and more fulfilling life. Conversely, individuals in disadvantaged social positions often face limited access to these resources, which can negatively impact their life trajectories and overall well-being. The study of life chances is central to understanding social inequality and how social structures shape individual lives and outcomes.
Life expectancy is a statistical measure indicating the average number of years a person can be expected to live from a particular age, such as birth, based on current mortality rates and demographic conditions within a specific population. It is a key indicator of a population's overall health and well-being, reflecting factors such as access to healthcare, nutrition, sanitation, environmental quality, and lifestyle choices. Life expectancy can vary significantly across different countries, regions, and social groups due to disparities in these underlying factors. Improvements in public health, medical advancements, and socioeconomic development have led to significant increases in life expectancy in many parts of the world over the past century. Demographers and sociologists study life expectancy to understand population trends, health disparities, and the social and environmental determinants of longevity.
Life histories are in-depth studies of the overall lives of individuals, often using a qualitative research approach that gathers detailed information about a person's experiences, perspectives, and the significant events that have shaped their life course. These studies often rely on a combination of data sources, including self-reporting through interviews, personal narratives, and autobiographies, as well as documentary evidence such as letters, diaries, photographs, and official records. The goal of life history research is to understand the individual's life within its broader social, cultural, and historical context, exploring how personal experiences intersect with larger social forces and patterns. This method can provide rich insights into topics such as identity formation, social change, the impact of historical events on individuals, and the subjective meanings people attach to their lives.
Lifelong learning is the concept and practice that learning and the acquisition of knowledge, skills, and competencies should occur continuously throughout all stages of an individual's life, not simply during the formal educational period early in life. This approach recognises the importance of ongoing learning for personal development, career advancement, social participation, and adapting to the rapidly changing demands of the modern world, particularly in the context of the knowledge economy and technological advancements. Lifelong learning can take various forms, including formal education and training, non-formal learning through workshops and courses, and informal learning through self-study, work experience, and social interactions. It emphasises the proactive and continuous pursuit of learning as a key aspect of navigating life in the 21st century.
The looking-glass self is a concept developed by sociologist Charles Horton Cooley that emphasises the idea that our sense of self and identity is largely the product of our social interactions with others. According to this theory, we develop our self-concept by imagining how we appear to others, how they judge our appearance and behaviour, and then we develop our sense of self based on these imagined perceptions and evaluations. The looking-glass self involves three main components: first, we imagine how we appear to others; second, we imagine their judgment of that appearance; and third, we develop a feeling about ourselves (such as pride or shame) based on these imagined judgments. This theory highlights the social nature of self-identity and the crucial role of social interaction in shaping who we are.
Low-income countries are nations characterised by a limited level of industrialisation, a predominantly agrarian economy, and widespread severe poverty affecting a significant portion of the population. These countries typically have a low gross national income (GNI) per capita, indicating limited economic resources and productivity. They often face challenges such as inadequate infrastructure, limited access to healthcare and education, high rates of unemployment or underemployment, and vulnerability to economic shocks and environmental disasters. The majority of the population in low-income countries may rely on subsistence agriculture, and there may be a significant gap between the wealthy elite and the large number of people living in poverty. International development efforts often focus on providing aid and support to low-income countries to improve their economic conditions and the well-being of their citizens.
Luddite were rebellious craft workers in early nineteenth-century England (primarily between 1811 and 1816) who engaged in protests, often involving the destruction of new factory machinery, as part of their resistance to the industrial revolution and the technological changes that threatened their livelihoods and traditional ways of working. These skilled artisans, such as weavers and textile workers, feared that the introduction of new machines like power looms would lead to job losses, lower wages, and a decline in the quality of their craft. The Luddite movement, though ultimately unsuccessful in halting industrialisation, represents an early example of social resistance to technological change and highlights the social and economic disruptions that can accompany major technological shifts. The term "Luddite" is sometimes used today to refer to individuals who are resistant to new technologies or industrial progress.
Machismo is a cultural concept, particularly prevalent in some Hispanic and Latin American cultures, that encompasses a sense of virility, personal worth, pride in one's maleness, and a strong sense of masculine honor and responsibility, often associated with dominance, assertiveness, and the expectation of deference from women. While it can include positive aspects such as protectiveness towards family and a strong work ethic, machismo can also be associated with negative traits like aggression, sexism, and a rigid adherence to traditional gender roles that may limit both men and women. The concept of machismo has been the subject of sociological study, particularly in understanding gender relations, family dynamics, and cultural values within specific cultural contexts.
Macro_Social_Structure_Theory encompasses theoretical perspectives that examine society at the broadest level, focusing on large-scale social institutions, systems, and their interconnections. These theories analyse how entire societies or global systems maintain stability, distribute power, and organise themselves structurally. Functionalist approaches within this category emphasise social equilibrium, institutional interdependence, and the mechanisms that maintain social order through shared values and norms. Power distribution theories examine whether control is concentrated among elites or distributed across multiple interest groups. World-systems theories explore global economic hierarchies and the interdependence of nations within capitalist structures. These macro-level perspectives share a common concern with understanding overarching social patterns, institutional arrangements, and systemic processes that shape entire societies or global systems, often emphasizing structural forces over individual agency in explaining social phenomena and change.
Macrosociology is a level of sociological investigation that concentrates on large-scale social phenomena, broad social structures, systems, and processes, or entire civilisations, rather than focusing on interactions between individuals or small groups. It aims to understand the big picture of society, examining how institutions, social hierarchies, and global patterns shape social life and individual experiences. Examples of topics studied in macrosociology include the state, the economy, social class systems, globalisation, social change on a large scale, and the relationships between different societies. Major theoretical perspectives in macrosociology include functionalism and conflict theory, which both analyse society at a broad level. This approach provides a framework for understanding the overarching forces and structures that influence social behaviour and outcomes.
Manifest functions are the recognised and intended consequences of any social pattern, institution, or social activity that are consciously acknowledged and stated by the individuals or groups involved. This concept, developed by sociologist Robert Merton as part of his functionalist analysis, helps to understand the overt and deliberate purposes of social phenomena. For example, the manifest function of education is to provide students with knowledge and skills necessary for their future roles in society. Similarly, the manifest function of laws is to maintain social order and regulate behaviour. Identifying manifest functions is a key step in sociological analysis, as it helps to understand the intended goals and outcomes of social structures and actions. It is often contrasted with latent functions, which are the unintended and often unrecognised consequences of the same social patterns.
Manufactured risk refers to dangers and uncertainties that are not the result of natural events but are created by the impact of human knowledge, technological development, and intervention in the natural world. These risks are often complex and may have unforeseen consequences due to the intricate interactions between human actions and natural systems. Examples of manufactured risk include global warming, which is largely attributed to human-induced greenhouse gas emissions; the potential hazards associated with genetically modified foods; the risks of nuclear power; and the unintended consequences of large-scale technological projects. Unlike natural risks, which may be perceived as external and unavoidable, manufactured risks often involve questions of responsibility, control, and ethical considerations related to human choices and their impact on the environment and society. The study of manufactured risk is important in sociology for understanding the challenges and uncertainties of modern, technologically advanced societies.
Marriage is a legally and socially sanctioned relationship between two or more people (though typically two), involving economic cooperation, emotional intimacy, and often normative sexual activity and child-bearing, which the individuals and society expect to be enduring or relatively permanent. The definition and practices of marriage vary significantly across cultures and have evolved over time, with changes in who can marry (e.g., same-sex marriage), the purposes of marriage (beyond procreation to include companionship and personal fulfillment), and the prevalence of different forms of marriage (e.g., monogamy, polygamy). Marriage often establishes kinship ties and defines rights and obligations between spouses and their families. It is a fundamental social institution that plays a crucial role in regulating sexual behaviour, organizing family life, and transmitting social status and property across generations.
Marriage_Forms_And_Structure encompasses the various institutionalised arrangements through which societies organise conjugal relationships and reproductive partnerships. This class includes both the structural variations in spousal arrangements (monogamy, polygamy, polygyny, polyandry) and the temporal patterns of marital relationships (serial monogamy). It also encompasses alternative relationship forms that provide some marital benefits without full legal marriage status (domestic partnerships). These forms reflect different cultural, economic, religious, and legal approaches to organizing intimate partnerships, reproductive responsibilities, and household formation. The diversity within this class demonstrates how societies adapt marriage institutions to meet varying social needs, resource constraints, and value systems while maintaining social order and continuity.
Marxist Theory is a comprehensive sociological and political theoretical framework stemming from the writings of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, which posits that societal development and social change are primarily driven by economic factors and class struggle. At its core, Marxist Theory asserts that in capitalist societies, there is an inherent conflict between two main classes: the bourgeoisie (the capitalist class who own the means of production) and the proletariat (the working class who must sell their labor power to survive). The theory argues that the bourgeoisie exploit the proletariat by extracting surplus value from their labor, which is the source of capitalist profit, leading to economic alienation and social inequality. Marxist Theory encompasses concepts like historical materialism (the idea that material conditions determine historical change), false consciousness (workers' inaccurate perception of their objective position), and class consciousness (workers' awareness of shared exploitation). It predicts that this class struggle will ultimately lead to a proletarian revolution, overthrowing capitalism and establishing a communist, classless society where the means of production are collectively owned.
Mass media refers to forms of communication, such as newspapers, magazines, radio, television, films, and the internet, that are designed to reach and influence very large audiences, often simultaneously. These media play a significant role in shaping public opinion, disseminating information, transmitting cultural values and norms, and providing entertainment. The development and widespread availability of mass media have had a profound impact on society, influencing everything from political campaigns and consumer behaviour to popular culture and social movements. Sociologists study mass media to understand its effects on individuals and society, including issues related to media ownership, content, audience reception, and the role of media in shaping social identities and perceptions of reality. The rise of digital and social media has further transformed the landscape of mass communication, creating new opportunities and challenges for how information is produced, distributed, and consumed.
Mass production is a system of manufacturing that involves the production of large quantities of standardised goods using machine power, specialised labor performing repetitive tasks, and often an assembly-line process. This method of production was a key outcome of the Industrial Revolution, particularly associated with the Fordist era of the early to mid-20th century, and it led to significant increases in efficiency and the availability of affordable consumer goods. Mass production relies on a high degree of division of labor and the use of interchangeable parts to streamline the manufacturing process. While it has been instrumental in driving economic growth and raising living standards, it has also been criticised for its potential to create monotonous and alienating work for employees and for its lack of flexibility in responding to diverse consumer demands. More recent trends in manufacturing include flexible production, which allows for greater customisation and variety.
Mass society is a sociological concept used to describe a society in which industrialisation, urbanisation, and expanding bureaucracies have led to the erosion of traditional social ties, such as those based on family, kinship, and local community. In a mass society, individuals may feel more isolated, anonymous, and disconnected from one another, with social relationships becoming more impersonal and instrumental. Traditional sources of social support and integration may weaken, potentially leading to feelings of alienation and a greater reliance on large-scale institutions like the state and corporations. The theory of mass society often suggests a decline in community bonds and a rise in individualism, which can have both positive and negative consequences for social life and individual well-being.
A master status is a social status that dominates all other statuses a person occupies and thereby determines their general position and identity within society, often shaping how others perceive and interact with them. A master status can be ascribed (e.g., race, gender, disability) or achieved (e.g., profession, criminal record) and can be either positive (e.g., being a renowned scientist) or negative (e.g., being labeled as a criminal). The impact of a master status is significant because it often overrides other aspects of a person's identity and can influence their opportunities, social interactions, and life experiences. For individuals who belong to marginalised groups, a master status such as race or disability can lead to systemic discrimination and shape their social standing regardless of their other achievements or qualities.
Material culture refers to the physical or technological aspects of our daily lives, including the tangible objects, artifacts, tools, technologies, and physical environment created, used, and valued by members of a society. This encompasses everything from clothing, food, and shelter to computers, cars, and infrastructure. Material culture reflects a society's technology, economic system, and values, and it plays a crucial role in shaping people's behaviour and social interactions. The study of material culture can provide insights into a society's history, beliefs, and practices. It is often contrasted with nonmaterial culture, which includes the intangible aspects of a culture such as ideas, values, beliefs, norms, and language.
The materialist conception of history, also known as historical materialism, is a view developed by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels according to which 'material' or economic factors, particularly the mode of production (how society organises the production of goods and services), have a prime role in determining historical change and the development of social structures, political systems, law, religion, and culture (the superstructure). This perspective argues that the way a society produces its material necessities shapes its social relations and its overall organisation. Changes in the mode of production, such as the shift from feudalism to capitalism, are seen as the fundamental driving forces behind historical transformations, leading to new class structures and social conflicts that ultimately propel societal development. The materialist conception of history emphasises the importance of economic conditions and class struggles in understanding the evolution of human societies.
Matriarchy is a form of social organisation in which females dominate males in terms of power, authority, and decision-making within the family, community, or society as a whole. In a matriarchal system, social status and property may be inherited through the female line, and women may hold prominent roles in political, economic, and religious spheres. While purely matriarchal societies are rare in recorded history, some societies exhibit matrifocal tendencies where women play a central role in the family and household, even if formal power structures are not exclusively in their hands. The concept of matriarchy is often contrasted with patriarchy, where males hold the dominant positions of power and authority.
Matrilineal descent is a kinship system that favours the relatives of the mother, tracing ancestral descent and inheritance primarily through the maternal line. In a matrilineal system, individuals belong to their mother's kin group, and lineage and inheritance rights are typically passed down from mothers to their children, particularly daughters. This does not necessarily imply matriarchal rule, as men may still hold positions of authority, but it does mean that kinship ties and social identity are primarily determined through the female side of the family. Matrilineal descent is found in various cultures around the world and can have significant implications for family structure, social organisation, and the transmission of property and social status across generations.
Matrilocality is a residential pattern observed in some societies where a married couple establishes their household in or very near the wife's family's residence. This practice often occurs in societies with matrilineal descent systems, where kinship and inheritance are traced through the female line, but it is not exclusively tied to such systems. Matrilocality can offer several advantages, such as providing support for the new couple from the wife's kin, facilitating childcare by grandparents and other female relatives, and strengthening the social and economic bonds within the wife's extended family. It can also influence the balance of power within the marriage and the wider family network, potentially giving more prominence or authority to the wife's lineage. This pattern of residence is one of the ways that societies organise post-marital living arrangements, with other common patterns being patrilocality (living with or near the husband's family) and neolocality (establishing an independent household).
Mean is a fundamental statistical measure of central tendency, commonly referred to as the average, which is calculated by summing all the individual values or cases in a dataset and then dividing that total by the number of individual cases or values. The mean provides a single number that represents the typical or central value of a set of data and is widely used in various fields, including sociology, to summarise and analyse quantitative information. For example, one might calculate the mean income of a population by adding up the incomes of all individuals and dividing by the total number of individuals. While the mean is a useful measure, it can be influenced by extreme values (outliers) in the data, which may not accurately represent the central tendency in some cases. In such situations, other measures of central tendency, such as the median or the mode, might be more appropriate.
The means of production, a core concept in Marxist theory, refers to the resources, tools, technologies, land, factories, and other infrastructure whereby the production of material goods is carried on in a society. This concept encompasses not just the physical technology involved in production but also the social relations between the producers (e.g., the relationship between the owners of the means of production and the workers who use them). According to Marx, the ownership and control of the means of production are central to understanding the structure of society and the distribution of power and wealth. In capitalist societies, the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) owns and controls the means of production, while the proletariat (working class) must sell their labor power to the bourgeoisie to survive, leading to inherent inequalities and class conflict.
Measures of central tendency are statistical methods used to calculate averages or typical values within a dataset, providing a summary of the central location of the data. The three most common measures of central tendency are the mean (the arithmetic average), the median (the middle value when the data is ordered), and the mode (the most frequently occurring value in the dataset). Each of these measures has its own strengths and is appropriate for different types of data and different analytical purposes. The mean is sensitive to extreme values, while the median is not. The mode is particularly useful for categorical data. Sociologists use measures of central tendency to describe and compare different groups or populations on various characteristics, such as income, age, or education level.
Mechanical Solidarity, a foundational concept developed by Émile Durkheim, describes a type of social cohesion and integration characteristic of traditional, pre-industrial societies. In such societies, social bonds are based on a high degree of homogeneity, where individuals share similar values, beliefs, customs, and engage in similar types of labor. This similarity leads to a strong collective consciousness or a common understanding of social norms and expectations, which binds people together through their likeness and shared experiences. Social order in societies with mechanical solidarity is maintained through the strong social pressure to conform to these uniform norms and values, and deviance is often met with harsh punitive sanctions to reinforce the collective morality. This form of solidarity fosters a powerful sense of community and belonging, where individuals feel deeply connected to one another through their shared identity and way of life, with relatively little individual autonomy compared to more modern societies.
Media and Communication is a broad sociological domain that systematically studies the diverse means, processes, and effects through which information, ideas, and messages are produced, disseminated, and received within society, and their profound impact on individuals, social groups, and social structures. This field encompasses various forms of mass media (e.g., television, radio, newspapers, film), digital media (e.g., the internet, cyberspace, multimedia, social media), and telecommunications. It examines how communication technologies shape social interaction (e.g., non-verbal communication, semiotics), the construction of meaning, and the formation of public opinion. The domain also analyses media texts (media products), media industries, media consumption patterns, and the role of communication in cultural transmission, social change, political processes, and the perpetuation or challenge of social inequalities. It delves into topics such as media ownership, content analysis, communication flows, and the digital divide, highlighting the pervasive influence of media in contemporary social life.
Media texts encompass all forms of media products, including television programmes, films, CDs, books, newspapers, website pages, social media posts, and advertisements, which are created and disseminated to communicate information, ideas, entertainment, or persuasion to an audience. These texts are not simply neutral carriers of information but are constructed with specific intentions and can be analysed for their content, form, audience, and the social, cultural, and political messages they convey. The study of media texts involves examining their production, distribution, and consumption, as well as their potential effects on individuals and society. Understanding media texts is crucial in sociology for analysing how media shapes our perceptions of the world, influences our beliefs and values, and contributes to the construction of social reality.
The median is a statistical measure of central tendency that represents the middle value in a range of numbers when the data is ordered from least to greatest. It is the point at which half of the data values are below and half are above it. The median is particularly useful as a measure of average when a dataset contains extreme values or outliers that might skew the mean (arithmetic average), as the median is not affected by these extreme scores. For example, in a distribution of incomes where a few individuals have very high incomes, the median income often provides a more representative measure of what is typical compared to the mean income. Calculating the median involves arranging the data in order and finding the central value; if there is an even number of data points, the median is the average of the two middle values.
A megalopolis is a vast urban region that contains a number of cities and their surrounding suburbs, forming an interconnected network of metropolitan areas that have grown together over time. These regions are characterised by high population density, extensive infrastructure connecting the different urban centers, and significant economic and social integration across the area. Examples of megalopolises include the BosWash corridor in the northeastern United States, which stretches from Boston to Washington, D.C., and the Tokaido corridor in Japan, connecting Tokyo and Osaka. The development of megalopolises reflects the increasing urbanisation and interconnectedness of modern societies, posing unique challenges and opportunities for urban planning, transportation, and regional governance.
The idea of a melting pot is a metaphor used to describe the process by which ethnic and cultural differences can be combined and blended together in a society to create new, hybrid patterns of behaviour, beliefs, and cultural expressions, drawing on diverse cultural sources. This concept suggests that immigrants and minority groups will eventually assimilate into the dominant culture, contributing their unique aspects which then become integrated into a new, common culture. The melting pot ideal is often contrasted with the concept of a "salad bowl" or cultural pluralism, where different cultures coexist while retaining their distinct identities and characteristics. The extent to which societies actually function as melting pots and the desirability of such a process are subjects of ongoing discussion in sociology and cultural studies, with considerations of power dynamics and the potential loss of cultural heritage often being raised.
Meta-Disciplinary_And_Foundational_Study encompasses the broader intellectual frameworks and disciplinary contexts within which sociological inquiry is situated. This domain addresses fundamental questions about the nature of scientific knowledge, the relationship between different forms of inquiry, and the epistemological foundations that underpin systematic investigation of social and natural phenomena. It examines the boundaries, connections, and distinctions between different modes of scientific investigation, providing context for understanding sociology's place within the broader landscape of academic disciplines. The domain contributes to ongoing discussions about interdisciplinarity, the unity and diversity of scientific approaches, and the methodological foundations that enable systematic investigation of complex phenomena. These foundational perspectives inform how sociologists understand their discipline's relationship to other fields of inquiry and its contributions to broader intellectual discourse. The domain addresses questions about the nature of scientific explanation, the relationship between quantitative and qualitative approaches, and the ways different disciplines contribute to comprehensive understanding of complex social and natural phenomena. This meta-level perspective is essential for understanding how sociological knowledge relates to other forms of systematic inquiry and contributes to broader intellectual and practical understanding.
Metanarrative are broad, overarching theories, grand narratives, or comprehensive belief systems about the operation of society, the nature of social change, and the meaning of history that attempt to provide a universal explanation or understanding of the world. These theories offer a framework for interpreting social phenomena and often make claims about the fundamental nature of reality and the direction of historical development. Marxism, with its theory of class struggle and historical materialism, and functionalism, with its view of society as a system striving for equilibrium, are examples of metanarratives that have been employed by sociologists to explain how the world works and how societies change over time. In postmodern thought, there is often skepticism towards metanarratives, with an emphasis on local narratives, diversity of perspectives, and the rejection of universal truths.
A metropolis is a large city that socially and economically dominates an urban area, often serving as a major center for commerce, culture, and innovation within a region or even a country. It typically has a high population density, a diverse economy, and a significant influence on the surrounding areas in terms of employment, services, and cultural trends. A metropolis often attracts people from smaller towns and rural areas seeking opportunities and amenities not available elsewhere. The term can also refer to the central city of a metropolitan area, which includes the city itself and its surrounding suburbs and exurbs that are economically and socially integrated with it. Metropolises play a crucial role in the global economy and are often hubs for international trade, finance, and communication.
Microsociology is a level of sociological investigation that primarily stresses the study of small groups and often employs laboratory experimental studies to examine face-to-face interactions and the dynamics of social life at a micro-level. This approach focuses on understanding how individuals interact with each other in everyday settings, the meanings they create and share through these interactions, and how these micro-level interactions shape broader social patterns and structures. Researchers using microsociology might study topics such as communication patterns in small groups, nonverbal behaviour, the construction of identity in social encounters, and the dynamics of power and status within small-scale settings. Methods commonly used in microsociology include participant observation, ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, and laboratory experiments designed to simulate social interactions. This perspective provides valuable insights into the fundamental building blocks of social life and how individual actions and interpretations contribute to the larger social world.
Migration refers to the movement of people into and out of a particular territory, which can occur within a country (internal migration) or across national borders (international migration). This movement can be temporary or permanent and can be driven by a variety of factors, including economic opportunities, political instability, environmental changes, social networks, and personal aspirations. Immigration involves the movement of people into a new country to settle, while emigration refers to the movement of people out of a country to live elsewhere. Migration patterns can have significant demographic, economic, social, and cultural impacts on both the areas of origin and the areas of destination, influencing population size and composition, labor markets, cultural diversity, and social integration. Sociologists study migration to understand its causes and consequences, the experiences of migrants, and the policies and social responses to migration flows.
Migration Processes refer to the complex and dynamic movements of people into and out of specific geographical territories, encompassing the various factors that influence these population shifts, the patterns they exhibit, and their profound impacts on both the sending and receiving societies. This category examines the reasons why people migrate, often broadly categorised as "push factors" (e.g., unemployment, conflict, persecution in the country of origin) and "pull factors" (e.g., economic opportunities, political freedom, family reunification in the destination country). It also includes different types of migration (e.g., immigration, emigration, forced migration, voluntary migration) and the experiences of migrants and refugees. Understanding migration processes is crucial for demographers and sociologists to analyse population changes, cultural diversity, labor market dynamics, and the social integration or exclusion of migrant populations, as well as the long-term historical and geopolitical consequences of such movements across borders.
A minority group is a group of people in a minority in a given society who, because of their distinct physical or cultural characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disability, find themselves in situations of inequality or disadvantage within that society. Membership in a minority group is typically ascribed rather than achieved, and these groups often experience discrimination, prejudice, and limited access to power and resources compared to the dominant or majority group. The term "minority" in this sociological context does not necessarily refer to a group's numerical size but rather to its subordinate status and lack of social, economic, and political power. Minority groups often develop a strong sense of group solidarity and shared identity in response to their experiences of marginalisation.
Miscegenation refers to biological reproduction by partners of different racial categories, often involving interracial marriage or sexual relationships between individuals from groups classified as different races within a society. The term is often associated with historical and social contexts where racial classifications were rigid and where laws or social norms prohibited or discouraged interracial unions. The concept of amalgamation in sociology, which describes the process by which a minority group and a majority group combine to form a new group through intermarriage, is closely related to miscegenation. The history of miscegenation is intertwined with issues of race, racism, and the social construction of racial categories, and laws prohibiting interracial marriage have been challenged and overturned in many parts of the world as discriminatory and unconstitutional.
Mixed methods refers to the use of both quantitative (numerical data and statistical analysis) and qualitative (non-numerical data such as interviews and observations) research methods as part of a single research study to provide a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the research question. This approach recognises that different methods have different strengths and limitations and that combining them can offer richer insights than relying on a single method alone. For example, a researcher might use quantitative surveys to gather data on the prevalence of a certain attitude in a population and then conduct qualitative interviews to explore the underlying reasons and experiences related to that attitude in more depth. Mixed methods research can enhance the validity and reliability of findings by triangulating data from different sources and providing a more holistic view of the phenomenon under investigation.
The mode is a statistical measure of central tendency that represents the number or value that appears most often in a given set of data. In other words, it is the most frequent observation in a distribution. The mode can be a helpful way of portraying central tendency, particularly for categorical data or when a dataset has a clear peak or concentration of values. A dataset can have one mode (unimodal), more than one mode (bimodal or multimodal), or no mode if all values occur with the same frequency. For example, in a survey asking about preferred colors, the mode would be the color that was chosen by the largest number of respondents. While the mode is easy to identify, it may not always be a unique or stable measure of central tendency, especially in small datasets or those with a wide range of values.
Modernisation is a far-reaching and complex process by which a society undergoes a fundamental transformation from traditional or less developed institutions, social structures, and cultural practices to those characteristic of more developed, industrialised, and often urbanised societies. This process typically involves significant changes in various aspects of social life, including the economy (shift from agriculture to industry), political systems (often towards democracy and increased state capacity), social structures (greater social mobility and differentiation), cultural values (emphasis on individualism, secularism, and rationality), and technology (adoption of advanced technologies). Modernisation is often associated with improvements in living standards, education, healthcare, and overall societal complexity, but it can also bring about social disruptions, inequalities, and challenges to traditional ways of life. Sociologists study modernisation to understand its causes, consequences, and the different paths that societies take in this transformative process.
Modernisation theory is a version of market-oriented development theory that argues that low-income societies can develop economically only if they give up their traditional ways, values, and institutions and adopt modern economic institutions, technologies, and cultural values that emphasise savings, investment, individualism, and productive work. This theory suggests that development follows a linear path through distinct stages, from traditional to modern, and that less developed countries can achieve modernisation by emulating the paths taken by more developed Western nations. Modernisation theory often focuses on internal factors within developing countries, such as cultural barriers to progress, and advocates for the adoption of Western models of economic and political organisation. It has been influential in shaping development policies but has also faced criticism for its ethnocentric bias, its failure to account for historical and global power dynamics, and its assumption that all societies will follow the same path of development.
Monarchy are those political systems that are typically headed by a single person, known as a monarch (such as a king, queen, emperor, or sultan), whose power and position are usually passed down through their family across generations, often based on hereditary principles. In a monarchy, the monarch may hold absolute power (absolute monarchy) or their power may be limited by a constitution or other governing bodies (constitutional monarchy). Historically, monarchy was a prevalent form of government in many parts of the world, and while many monarchies have been replaced by other forms of government, some still exist today, often playing a symbolic or ceremonial role rather than wielding significant political power. The study of monarchies in political sociology examines their historical evolution, their different forms and functions, and their role in shaping political systems and social structures.
Monogamy is a form of marriage in which each married partner is allowed to have only one spouse at any given time. This is the most common form of marriage in many parts of the world today, particularly in Western industrialised societies, and is often legally recognised as the only legitimate form of marriage. Monogamy can be contrasted with polygamy, which involves having more than one spouse at the same time (either polygyny, where a man has multiple wives, or polyandry, where a woman has multiple husbands). Serial monogamy, where individuals have multiple spouses throughout their lives but only one at a time, is also a common pattern in some societies. The prevalence and social norms surrounding monogamy vary across cultures and are influenced by factors such as religion, law, and economic conditions.
Monopoly refers to the control of a particular market or industry by a single business firm, giving that firm the power to dominate the market without significant competition. In a monopoly, the single firm is the sole producer or seller of a specific product or service, allowing it to set prices, control supply, and potentially limit consumer choice. This lack of competition can lead to higher prices, lower quality, and reduced innovation compared to markets with multiple competing firms. Monopolies can arise due to various factors, such as government regulations granting exclusive rights, the control of essential resources, high barriers to entry that prevent new firms from competing, or network effects where the value of a product or service increases as more people use it. While some monopolies may be considered natural due to inherent efficiencies of scale in certain industries, they are often subject to government regulation and antitrust laws aimed at preventing unfair competition and protecting consumer interests. The existence of a monopoly can have significant implications for the economy and society, affecting market dynamics, consumer welfare, and the distribution of wealth.
Monotheism is the belief in the existence of one single God or supreme being, who is typically seen as the creator and ruler of the universe. This belief system is central to several major world religions, including Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, which each have their own distinct theological understandings of this one God. Monotheism contrasts with polytheism, which is the belief in multiple gods, and atheism, which is the disbelief in any gods. The development of monotheistic beliefs has had a profound impact on the religious, philosophical, and ethical traditions of many cultures, shaping moral codes, worldviews, and social institutions. The concept of a single, all-powerful God often implies a unified and coherent understanding of the cosmos and humanity's place within it.
Morbidity rates refer to the incidence or prevalence of diseases, illnesses, injuries, or other health problems within a given population over a specific period of time. Incidence rates measure the number of new cases of a disease or condition that occur in a population at risk during a specified period, while prevalence rates measure the total number of cases (both new and existing) of a disease or condition present in a population at a particular point in time or during a specific period. Morbidity rates are important indicators of the health status of a population and are used in public health to track disease trends, identify risk factors, and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and healthcare systems. They can be expressed in various ways, such as the number of cases per 1,000 or 100,000 people in the population per year, and can be specific to certain diseases, age groups, or other demographic categories.
Mortality, in demography, is the study of death within human populations, encompassing the incidence, rates, and patterns of death. This category includes key demographic measures such as the crude death rate (the number of deaths per 1,000 population in a given year), the infant mortality rate (deaths of infants under one year per 1,000 live births), and age-specific mortality rates, which provide insights into the health and longevity of a population. Mortality is influenced by a wide array of factors, including access to healthcare, sanitation, nutrition, lifestyle choices, environmental conditions, socioeconomic status, and the prevalence of specific diseases or causes of death. Analysing mortality data is crucial for public health planning, assessing the effectiveness of health interventions, identifying health disparities among different social groups, and understanding overall population dynamics and trends in life expectancy across different regions and historical periods.
Mortality rate refers to the incidence of death in a given population during a specific period of time, typically one year, and is often expressed as the number of deaths per 1,000 or 100,000 people in the population. It is a fundamental demographic indicator used to assess the health status of a population, track changes in death patterns over time, and make comparisons across different groups or regions. Mortality rates can be influenced by a wide range of factors, including age structure of the population, prevalence of diseases, access to healthcare, nutritional levels, environmental conditions, and socioeconomic factors. Specific mortality rates can be calculated for different age groups, sexes, or causes of death to provide more detailed insights into the patterns of mortality within a population. The crude death rate, which measures the total number of deaths in a year per 1,000 population, is a basic but widely used measure of mortality.
Mos are norms deemed highly necessary to the welfare of a society because they embody the most cherished principles or core values of a group, often carrying strong moral connotations and associated with intense feelings of right and wrong. They are informal rules of conduct that dictate what is considered morally acceptable or unacceptable behaviour, and violations of mores typically evoke strong social disapproval, condemnation, or even severe sanctions. Examples of mores in many societies include prohibitions against theft, murder, and incest. Mos are often deeply ingrained in a culture and are transmitted through socialisation across generations, contributing to social stability and the maintenance of ethical standards. They differ from folkways, which are also informal norms but govern everyday social behaviour and whose violation raises comparatively little concern.
Multiculturalism is a perspective and a set of policies that recognize, value, and promote the coexistence of several distinct cultural or ethnic groups within a given society on equal terms, without any single culture dominating the others. It emphasises the importance of cultural diversity and encourages the retention of unique cultural identities, traditions, languages, and practices, while also fostering social integration and mutual respect among different groups. In a multicultural society, ethnic groups exist separately but ideally share equally in economic, political, and social life, contributing to a richer and more diverse society as a whole. Multiculturalism is often contrasted with assimilation, where minority groups are expected to adopt the culture of the dominant group, and the "melting pot" ideal, where different cultures are expected to blend together to form a new, common culture.
Multilinear evolutionary theory is a theory of social change that holds that change can occur in several different ways and does not inevitably lead all societies through the same fixed stages or in the same direction of development. This perspective acknowledges that societies are complex and adapt to their specific environmental, historical, and cultural contexts, resulting in diverse pathways of social evolution. Unlike earlier unilinear evolutionary theories that posited a single, universal sequence of societal development from simple to complex forms, multilinear evolution recognises the variety of forms that social change can take and the influence of specific local conditions on the trajectory of societal development. It emphasises the importance of studying individual societies in their own unique contexts rather than trying to fit them into a predetermined evolutionary framework.
Multimedia refers to the combination of what used to be different media formats, requiring different technologies for access and presentation (for instance, visuals, audio, text, video, and interactive elements), integrated onto a single medium or platform, such as a CD-ROM, DVD, website, or computer application, which can be accessed and experienced using a computer or other digital device. This integration allows for a richer and more engaging user experience by combining various forms of content in a cohesive and interactive way. The rise of digital technologies has greatly facilitated the creation and distribution of multimedia content, transforming how information is communicated, entertainment is consumed, and learning takes place.
Multinational corporations (MNCs) are large commercial organisations that are headquartered in one country (the home country) but conduct business operations, including production, marketing, sales, and research and development, in numerous other countries around the world (host countries). These corporations often have significant economic power and play a major role in the global economy through foreign direct investment, international trade, and the transfer of technology and capital across borders. MNCs can have both positive and negative impacts on the countries in which they operate, providing jobs and investment but also potentially raising issues related to labor practices, environmental regulations, and economic sovereignty. The study of multinational corporations is an important area in sociology, particularly in the context of globalisation and its effects on national economies and societies.
The multiple-nuclei theory is a theory of urban growth developed by Chauncy Harris and Edward Ullman that views the growth of cities as emerging from many centers of development or "nuclei," rather than expanding outward from a single central business district as suggested by the concentric-zone theory. This theory posits that a city may have several distinct centers of activity, each specializing in a particular urban need or activity, such as a retail district, a manufacturing area, a residential suburb, or a university campus. The development of these multiple nuclei is influenced by factors such as the availability of land, transportation routes, the clustering of similar industries or activities, and the avoidance of incompatible land uses. The multiple-nuclei theory provides a more complex and realistic model of urban structure, particularly for large, sprawling cities that have developed over time and have multiple centers of economic and social activity.
A nation is a group of people who are bound together by a strong sense of shared values, cultural characteristics such as language and religion, and a perceived common history, often aspiring to self-determination and the formation of their own state. The sense of belonging and collective identity among members of a nation is often based on shared cultural heritage, traditions, myths, and a feeling of common destiny. While a nation may or may not have its own state, the desire for national self-governance is a central aspect of nationalism. The boundaries of a nation are often culturally defined and may not always align with the political boundaries of existing states, leading to complex issues of national identity, territorial claims, and political movements for national unification or independence.
A nation state is a political apparatus that exercises sovereignty and authority over a specific territory, with a population of citizens who typically share a strong sense of national identity, often reinforced by common cultural characteristics such as language, religion, and a perceived shared history, and whose authority is backed up by military force and a nationalistic, sovereign creed. The concept of a nation state combines the political entity of the state with the cultural and social entity of the nation, where the state is seen as representing and protecting the interests and identity of the nation within its defined borders. The rise of the nation state is a key feature of modern political history, particularly in Europe, and it continues to be the dominant form of political organisation globally, although the relationship between nation and state can be complex and contested, especially in diverse or multinational states.
Nationalism is a complex set of beliefs, political ideas, and social movements that express a strong sense of identification with a given national community and pursue the interests, unity, and sovereignty of that community, often prioritizing national interests above all other considerations. Nationalism typically involves a belief in the unique character and destiny of one's nation, a sense of pride and loyalty to the nation, and a desire to promote its culture, interests, and well-being. It can be a powerful force in shaping political landscapes, driving movements for national independence, unification, or expansion, and influencing international relations. While nationalism can foster social cohesion and a sense of collective identity, it can also lead to exclusionary attitudes towards other nations and minority groups, as well as to conflict and rivalry between nations.
The natural environment encompasses the Earth's surface and atmosphere, including all living organisms (plants, animals, microorganisms) as well as the non-living components such as the air, water, soil, rocks, and other resources that are necessary to sustain life and ecological systems. It represents the part of the environment that is not directly created or significantly altered by human activities, although human actions increasingly have a global impact on natural environments. The study of the natural environment is crucial for understanding ecological processes, biodiversity, and the interactions between living organisms and their surroundings. It is also essential for addressing environmental challenges such as pollution, resource depletion, and climate change, which have significant social and ecological consequences.
Natural science is a branch of science that focuses on the study of the physical features of nature and the ways in which they interact and change, using systematic observation, experimentation, and the formulation of testable hypotheses and theories to understand the natural world. The natural sciences typically include disciplines such as physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, and environmental science, each focusing on different aspects of the natural world and employing specific methodologies to investigate natural phenomena. The goal of natural science is to gain a deeper understanding of the fundamental laws and principles that govern the universe and the processes that shape it, providing a foundation for technological advancements and our understanding of our place in the natural world.
Negotiated order is a sociological concept that refers to a social structure or system that does not have a fixed or predetermined existence but rather derives its character and stability from the ongoing social interactions and negotiations through which people define, interpret, and redefine its elements, rules, and boundaries. This perspective emphasises the dynamic and emergent nature of social organisation, highlighting how social order is continuously constructed and maintained through the interactions and agreements among individuals and groups within a particular setting or context. The negotiated order can be influenced by power dynamics, shared understandings, and the ongoing processes of communication and adjustment among participants. It suggests that social structures are not static entities but are constantly being shaped and reshaped by the interactions of those within them.
Negotiation is a fundamental social process that involves the attempt by two or more parties with differing interests or goals to reach a mutually acceptable agreement concerning some objective, issue, or course of action. It typically involves communication, discussion, and bargaining, where each party may make concessions or compromises to find a common ground that satisfies their essential needs or interests. Negotiation can occur in various contexts, from interpersonal relationships and business transactions to political and international relations. The success of negotiation often depends on factors such as the parties' willingness to compromise, their communication skills, their understanding of each other's needs and interests, and the power dynamics between them. It is a key mechanism for conflict resolution, cooperation, and the achievement of shared goals in diverse social settings.
Neo-colonialism refers to a new form of global power relationship that involves not direct political control over former colonies, but rather economic exploitation and dominance exerted by powerful multinational corporations and global financial institutions based in developed countries over less developed nations. In this system, former colonies or developing countries may be politically independent but remain economically dependent on and vulnerable to the interests of these powerful economic actors from the developed world. This dependence can manifest through control over key industries, trade imbalances, debt burdens, and the influence of international financial policies that may benefit wealthy nations at the expense of poorer ones. Neo-colonialism suggests that the patterns of global inequality established during the colonial era persist through economic mechanisms rather than direct political rule.
Neo-locality is a residential pattern in which a married couple chooses to live apart from the parents of both spouses, establishing a new and independent household in a location of their own choosing. This pattern is common in many modern, industrialised societies where there is an emphasis on individualism, independence, and the nuclear family unit. Neo-locality allows the newly married couple to establish their own rules, traditions, and lifestyle without the direct influence or oversight of either set of parents. It reflects a shift away from more traditional residential patterns like patrilocality (living with or near the husband's family) and matrilocality (living with or near the wife's family), which were more prevalent in agricultural and extended family-based societies. The rise of neo-locality is linked to factors such as increased geographic mobility, economic independence, and changing cultural norms about family life.
Neoliberalism is a dominant economic belief system and political ideology that advocates for free market forces as the primary route to economic growth and prosperity, achieved by minimizing government restrictions and interventions on business and the economy. Key tenets of neoliberalism include deregulation, privatisation of state-owned enterprises, reduced government spending on social programs, free trade, and fiscal austerity. This ideology gained prominence in the late 20th century and has influenced economic policies in many countries around the world, often leading to increased globalisation and a greater role for the private sector in the economy. While proponents argue that neoliberal policies promote efficiency, innovation, and economic growth, critics point to potential negative consequences such as increased income inequality, social instability, and environmental degradation due to the prioritisation of market forces over social and environmental concerns.
A network in sociology refers to a set of informal and formal social ties that connects individuals, groups, or organisations to each other, forming a web of relationships through which information, resources, and social support can flow. These networks can vary in size, density, and complexity, ranging from small, close-knit groups to large, loosely connected global networks facilitated by technology. Social networks play a crucial role in various aspects of social life, influencing everything from job opportunities and social mobility to the spread of ideas and social support systems. The strength and nature of these ties (e.g., strong vs. weak ties) can have different implications for the individuals involved and the functioning of the network as a whole. Sociologists study social networks to understand social capital, social influence, and the structure of social relationships at different levels of analysis.
New social movements (NSMs) are organised collective activities that promote autonomy, self-determination, and improvements in the quality of life, often focusing on issues beyond traditional class-based or economic concerns. These movements typically emerge in post-industrial societies and address issues such as environmental protection, human rights, peace, gender equality, and social justice, often mobilizing through grassroots activism, non-hierarchical structures, and the use of media and technology to raise awareness and advocate for change. NSMs often emphasise identity, culture, and the transformation of values and social norms, rather than solely seeking political power or economic redistribution. They represent a shift in the focus of social movements towards broader social and cultural issues and often involve diverse participants united by shared values and concerns about the direction of modern society.
New urban sociology is a contemporary approach to the study of urbanisation that goes beyond traditional ecological models by considering the complex interplay of local, national, and worldwide forces and their profound effect on local urban space and the lives of city dwellers. This perspective places a special emphasis on the impact of global economic activity, political decisions, and social inequalities on the development and transformation of cities, recognizing that urban areas are not isolated entities but are deeply embedded in broader regional, national, and global contexts. New urban sociology examines issues such as gentrification, urban sprawl, the spatial concentration of poverty, the role of global capital in shaping urban landscapes, and the social and economic consequences of these processes for different groups within cities. It highlights the interconnectedness of local urban dynamics with larger global forces and power structures.
Newly industrialising countries (NICs) are lower-income nations that are experiencing rapid economic growth and a significant shift towards industrial production and manufacturing, leading to a fast transition towards becoming higher-income countries with more developed economies. These countries often attract foreign investment, develop their infrastructure, and increase their participation in global trade, experiencing a rise in their standard of living and a more diversified economy beyond traditional agriculture or resource extraction. Examples of NICs include countries in Southeast Asia, Latin America, and parts of Eastern Europe that have achieved significant economic progress in recent decades. The process of industrialisation in these countries often brings about significant social and economic changes, including urbanisation, the growth of a middle class, and shifts in employment patterns.
Nisei is a term of Japanese origin, meaning "second generation," used in countries in North America and South America to refer to people born in those countries to at least one Issei (first-generation) immigrant parent who was born in Japan. The Nisei generation grew up in a cultural context that was often a blend of Japanese heritage and the culture of their birth country. In the United States, the Nisei faced significant challenges and discrimination, particularly during World War II when many were unjustly incarcerated in internment camps along with their Issei parents. Despite these hardships, the Nisei generation played a crucial role in navigating their dual identities and contributing to the social and economic fabric of their adopted countries. Subsequent generations include Sansei (third generation) and Yonsei (fourth generation).
Non-material culture encompasses the intangible world of ideas, beliefs, values, norms, symbols, language, and social practices created and shared by the members of a society, shaping their understanding of the world and guiding their behaviour. It includes the abstract creations of human societies that are not embodied in physical objects. Non-material culture is just as crucial as material culture in defining a society's way of life and distinguishes human societies from one another. It is learned through socialisation and is transmitted across generations, forming the basis of cultural traditions and social order. Examples of non-material culture include religious beliefs, moral codes, customs, and systems of knowledge.
Non-verbal communication refers to the sending and receiving of messages through the use of body movements, gestures, facial expressions, posture, eye contact, touch, and other non-linguistic cues rather than through spoken or written words. These nonverbal signals can convey a wide range of emotions, attitudes, intentions, and meanings, often complementing, contradicting, or substituting for verbal communication. Non-verbal communication is a fundamental aspect of social interaction and plays a crucial role in how we understand and relate to others. Cultural norms can significantly influence the interpretation of nonverbal cues, leading to potential misunderstandings across different cultural contexts.
Norm are the rules, standards, and expectations of behaviour that are widely shared and understood within a society or group, guiding the actions and interactions of its members and defining what is considered acceptable, appropriate, and desirable in various social situations. Norm can be formal, such as laws and written rules with specific sanctions for violations, or informal, such as customs, traditions, and social etiquette that are maintained through social approval or disapproval. They provide a framework for social order and cohesion, helping individuals to anticipate how others will behave and to know how they themselves are expected to act. Norm vary across cultures and can change over time within a society, reflecting evolving values and beliefs.
Normal accidents are failures that are considered inevitable, or at least highly likely, given the inherent complexity and tight coupling of human and technological systems, particularly in high-risk industries such as nuclear power, aviation, and chemical processing. This theory, developed by sociologist Charles Perrow, suggests that in such complex systems, multiple unexpected failures can interact in unforeseen ways, leading to accidents that are not simply the result of isolated errors but are a systemic outcome of the organisation and technology involved. The interactive complexity and tight coupling of these systems make it difficult to predict or prevent all potential failure combinations, leading to what Perrow terms "normal" accidents, meaning they are a normal, albeit infrequent, feature of such systems.
Nuclear_And_Extended_Family_Unit represents traditional family structures organised around biological relationships, marriage bonds, and formal adoption arrangements that create legally and socially recognised kinship networks. These aggregates typically involve multiple generations and various degrees of kinship connection, serving as primary sites of socialisation, economic cooperation, and emotional support. They are characterised by established roles, responsibilities, and patterns of interaction that are culturally defined and socially sanctioned. These family units often serve as the primary context for child development, the transmission of cultural values and traditions, and the provision of care and support throughout the life cycle. The structure and dynamics of these units reflect broader cultural values about kinship, gender roles, and family obligations.
A nuclear family is a family group that consists of a mother, a father (or one of these parents in the case of single-parent families), and their dependent children living together in the same household. This family structure is often considered the traditional or dominant family form in many Western industrialised societies, although diverse family arrangements are increasingly common. The nuclear family is typically characterised by close emotional bonds, economic cooperation, and the responsibility of the adult members for the upbringing and well-being of their children. It plays a crucial role in the socialisation of children and provides a primary source of social support for its members.
Obedience refers to compliance with the directives, commands, or instructions given by higher authorities in a hierarchical structure, such as in a workplace, military organisation, or within a family. It involves following the orders or rules set by those in positions of power or authority, even if one might personally disagree with them. Obedience is often seen as necessary for maintaining order and efficiency in hierarchical systems, but it can also raise ethical concerns when individuals are asked to follow commands that they believe are wrong or harmful, as highlighted by studies like the Milgram experiment on obedience to authority.
Objectivity in research refers to a state of personal neutrality, impartiality, and the absence of bias or preconceived notions in the process of conducting research, analysing data, and interpreting findings. Researchers strive for objectivity to ensure that their personal opinions, values, or political beliefs do not unduly influence the research process or its outcomes, allowing the evidence to speak for itself. While complete objectivity may be an ideal that is difficult to achieve fully in social science research due to the researcher's own social location and perspectives, researchers employ various methods and techniques, such as standardised procedures, peer review, and transparency in reporting findings, to minimise bias and enhance the objectivity and credibility of their work.
Observation is a fundamental research technique in which an investigator systematically collects information and data through direct participation in and/or observation of a group, tribe, community, or social setting being studied. This method is often used in qualitative research, particularly in ethnography and field studies, to gain an in-depth understanding of social behaviours, interactions, and cultural practices in their natural context. Researchers may choose to be participant observers, actively engaging in the activities of the group while also observing, or non-participant observers, observing from a distance without directly participating. Systematic observation involves developing a focused research question, defining what will be observed, and using a structured approach to record and analyse the observations. This method allows for the collection of rich, detailed data about social life as it unfolds.
An operational definition is a clear, precise, and specific explanation of an abstract concept that is formulated in a way that allows a researcher to measure the concept empirically and systematically. It involves defining the concept in terms of the concrete, observable, and measurable indicators or procedures that will be used to represent it in a research study. For example, if a researcher is studying the concept of "happiness," an operational definition might be the score an individual reports on a standardised happiness scale, or the frequency with which they exhibit positive emotions during an observation period. Providing operational definitions is crucial for ensuring clarity, consistency, and replicability in research, as it specifies exactly how a concept will be measured and allows other researchers to understand and potentially replicate the study.
Oral history refers to a method of collecting historical information and personal narratives through interviews with people about events they witnessed or experienced earlier in their lives. These interviews are typically recorded and transcribed, providing valuable primary source material that can offer unique perspectives and details not found in written documents. Oral history is widely used in sociology, history, anthropology, and other social sciences to understand past events, social changes, and the lived experiences of individuals and communities from their own viewpoints. It can capture the nuances of personal memories, emotions, and interpretations, enriching our understanding of the past and contributing to a more diverse and inclusive historical record.
Organic Solidarity, a fundamental concept in Émile Durkheim's sociological theory, describes the form of social cohesion and integration that characterises modern, complex, and industrialised societies. Unlike mechanical solidarity, which is based on similarity and shared beliefs in traditional societies, organic solidarity arises from the interdependence of individuals and groups due to a highly specialised division of labor. In societies with organic solidarity, individuals perform diverse, specialised tasks and rely on each other to fulfill their needs and contribute to the overall functioning of society as an integrated whole. This mutual dependence, or functional interdependence, fosters social unity even in the absence of a strong collective consciousness or shared morality. Durkheim argued that organic solidarity is maintained through the regulation of these interdependent relationships, often through formal laws and contracts, and the recognition that each person's unique contribution is vital to the well-being of the collective, thereby allowing for greater individual autonomy within a larger social system.
An organisation in sociology refers to a large group of individuals who are structured and coordinated to achieve specific goals or purposes, involving a definite set of authority relations, rules, and procedures that govern their activities. Organisations can range from formal entities like corporations, government agencies, and educational institutions to more informal groups with shared objectives. They are characterised by a division of labor, a hierarchy of authority, and established patterns of communication and interaction among their members. Sociologists study organisations to understand their structure, culture, dynamics, and their role in shaping social life and achieving collective goals.
Organisational_And_Societal_Rationalisation_Process represents the systematic transformation of social institutions, organisational structures, and cultural practices toward greater efficiency, predictability, and rule-based coordination characteristic of modern societies. These processes embody Max Weber's central insights about the fundamental character of modernity, where traditional, emotional, or value-based modes of social organisation are increasingly replaced by rational, calculable, and bureaucratic approaches. Rationalisation manifests in the development of formal rules, procedures, and hierarchical structures that prioritise efficiency and systematic organisation over personal relationships or traditional authority. Bureaucratisation represents the institutional expression of this broader rationalisation trend, as organisations adopt formal hierarchies, specialised roles, and standardised procedures to manage complex activities. Modernisation encompasses the comprehensive social transformation toward rationalised institutions, technological advancement, and systematic approaches to social organisation. These processes fundamentally reshape how societies coordinate collective action, make decisions, and organise productive activities. While rationalisation has enabled unprecedented levels of social coordination and technological achievement, it also creates new forms of social control and can lead to what Weber termed the "iron cage" of bureaucracy. Understanding these processes is crucial for analysing how modern societies balance efficiency with flexibility, formal coordination with personal autonomy, and systematic organisation with creative innovation.
Organised crime refers to the work of a group or network of individuals who engage in illegal activities on an ongoing basis, often regulating relations between various criminal enterprises involved in areas such as the smuggling and sale of drugs, prostitution, gambling, extortion, and other illicit activities for profit. These groups typically have a hierarchical structure, rules of conduct, and may use violence, corruption, and intimidation to maintain their power and control over their criminal operations. Organised crime can have significant social and economic consequences, undermining legitimate businesses, corrupting public officials, and contributing to violence and instability in communities.
An out-group is any group or category of people to which individuals feel they do not belong and with which they do not identify, often viewing them as different from or even in opposition to their own in-group. The distinction between in-groups and out-groups is fundamental to social identity theory and can influence social interactions, attitudes, and behaviours towards members of both groups. Individuals may perceive out-group members as less similar to themselves and may hold stereotypes or prejudices about them, sometimes leading to intergroup conflict or discrimination. The boundaries between in-groups and out-groups can be fluid and context-dependent, shifting based on social situations and group affiliations.
Outsourcing is the business practice of contracting out a company's work tasks, functions, or processes to external third-party providers or service providers, which were previously carried out internally by the company's own employees. Companies may choose to outsource for various reasons, such as to reduce costs, improve efficiency, access specialised skills or technologies, or focus on their core business activities. Outsourcing can involve a wide range of functions, including manufacturing, information technology services, customer support, human resources, and accounting. While it can offer benefits to companies, outsourcing can also have implications for the company's employees, potentially leading to job losses or changes in working conditions, and can also raise ethical considerations related to labor practices and quality control in the outsourced operations.
Participant observation is a key method of research widely used in sociology and anthropology, particularly in ethnographic studies, in which the researcher takes part in the activities, routines, and daily life of a group or community being studied over an extended period of time, while also systematically observing their behaviour and interactions in their natural setting. The goal of participant observation is to gain an in-depth understanding of the group's culture, perspectives, and social world from an insider's point of view, by immersing oneself in their environment and experiencing life as they do. This method allows researchers to gather rich, qualitative data about social processes, meanings, and practices that may not be accessible through other research techniques like surveys or interviews alone.
Participatory democracy is a system of democracy that emphasises the broad participation of all members of a group or community in the collective taking of major decisions that affect their lives, rather than relying solely on elected representatives to make decisions on their behalf. This form of democracy seeks to maximise citizen involvement in political and social decision-making processes, often through direct participation in forums, assemblies, or other mechanisms that allow for collective deliberation and action. The aim of participatory democracy is to empower individuals and communities to have a greater say in shaping their own futures and to promote a more inclusive and responsive form of governance.
Pastoral societies are preindustrial societies whose primary mode of subsistence and economic activity derives from the rearing and herding of domesticated animals, such as sheep, goats, cattle, or camels, for food, clothing, shelter, and transportation. These societies often have a nomadic or semi-nomadic lifestyle, with a need to migrate between different areas according to seasonal changes in pasture availability or to seek fresh grazing lands for their herds. Social organisation in pastoral societies is often structured around kinship ties and the ownership and management of livestock, which can be a significant source of wealth and status. Compared to hunter-gatherer societies, pastoral societies tend to have larger populations and a more complex social structure, but they are often less settled than agrarian societies that rely on crop cultivation.
Pastoralism refers to a type of technology and way of life that is based on the domestication, herding, and raising of animals for subsistence and economic purposes. This practice involves managing herds of animals, such as cattle, sheep, goats, or camels, and often requires mobility to follow grazing patterns and ensure the animals have sufficient food and water. Pastoralism is the primary economic base of pastoral societies and has been a significant mode of adaptation to certain environments, particularly arid and semi-arid regions where crop cultivation may be difficult. The social organisation, cultural practices, and knowledge systems of pastoralist groups are often closely intertwined with their reliance on domesticated animals.
Patriarchy is a form of social organisation in which men hold the primary power and predominate in roles of political leadership, moral authority, social privilege, and control of property, and in the domain of the family where fathers or father figures hold authority over women and children. This system often involves the oppression and exploitation of women, who typically have less access to resources and decision-making processes. Patriarchal structures are prevalent in many societies throughout history and continue to shape gender relations and social inequalities in various ways, influencing laws, customs, and cultural norms that often favour men and limit the opportunities and autonomy of women.
Patrilineal descent is a kinship system that favours the relatives of the father, tracing ancestral lineage, inheritance, and social identity primarily through the male line. In this system, individuals belong to their father's kin group, and family name, property, and social status are typically passed down from fathers to their sons across generations. This emphasis on the paternal line often reinforces patriarchal structures within society, where men tend to hold more power and authority within the family and in broader social institutions. Patrilineal descent is a common form of kinship organisation in many cultures around the world and has significant implications for family structure, inheritance patterns, and social relationships.
Patrilocality is a residential pattern in which a married couple establishes their household in or very near the husband's family's residence, often living with the husband's parents or other male relatives. This practice is frequently associated with patrilineal descent systems, where kinship and inheritance are traced through the male line, as it keeps male family members and their offspring together, reinforcing family ties and the transmission of property and social status through the paternal lineage. Patrilocality can also provide support for the new couple from the husband's family and strengthen the husband's ties to his kin group. This residential pattern is one of the ways that societies organise post-marital living arrangements, with other common patterns being matrilocality (living with or near the wife's family) and neolocality (establishing an independent household).
A peer group is a social group whose members share common characteristics such as similar interests, social position, age, and often a sense of shared identity and belonging. Peer groups play a significant role in the socialisation process, particularly during adolescence, influencing individuals' attitudes, values, behaviours, and self-concept. They provide a context for learning social skills, developing relationships, and establishing norms and expectations that may differ from those of the family or broader society. Peer influence can be strong, shaping choices related to fashion, music, activities, and even academic performance. Peer groups can provide social support and a sense of community, but they can also exert pressure to conform to group norms, sometimes in ways that may be positive or negative for the individual.
Peripheral countries, according to world-systems theory developed by Immanuel Wallerstein, are those countries that have a marginal and often subordinate role in the global economy and are thus dependent on the core-producing (wealthy, industrialised) societies for their trading relationships, often serving as sources of raw materials, cheap labor, and markets for core countries' products. These countries typically have less diversified economies, weaker state institutions, and lower levels of industrialisation and technological development compared to core and semi-peripheral nations. The economic relationships between core and peripheral countries are often characterised by unequal exchange, where peripheral nations may be exploited for their resources and labor, hindering their own economic development and perpetuating global inequalities.
In everyday speech, personality refers to a person's typical patterns of attitudes, needs, characteristics, and behaviour that are relatively stable and consistent over time and across different situations, influencing how they think, feel, and interact with the world and others. In sociology and psychology, personality is studied as the enduring patterns of thoughts, feelings, and behaviours that make each individual unique. Various theories attempt to explain the development and structure of personality, including psychodynamic, humanistic, trait-based, and social-cognitive perspectives, each emphasizing different factors such as unconscious drives, personal growth, stable characteristics, and the interaction between individuals and their social environment.
Pilot studies are small-scale, preliminary research studies or trial runs that are conducted in survey research or other research methodologies before the main study is carried out. The purpose of a pilot study is to test and refine the research design, instruments (such as questionnaires or interview guides), and procedures to identify any potential problems, ambiguities, or flaws before investing more time and resources in the full-scale study. Pilot studies can help researchers to assess the feasibility of their research methods, estimate the time and resources needed for the main study, and make necessary adjustments to improve the quality and validity of the final results.
Pluralism, in a sociological context, refers to a condition or ideology in which mutual respect and tolerance exist between the various cultural, ethnic, racial, religious, or other groups within a society, allowing minorities to maintain and express their own distinct cultures, traditions, and identities without experiencing prejudice, discrimination, or pressure to assimilate into the dominant culture. In a pluralistic society, diversity is valued and seen as enriching the social fabric, with different groups coexisting peacefully and participating equally in economic and political life while retaining their unique cultural heritage. This is often contrasted with assimilation, where minority groups are expected to adopt the dominant culture, and segregation, where groups are physically or socially separated.
The pluralist model is a view of society that posits that power is not concentrated in the hands of a single elite group but is rather distributed among many competing interest groups within the community, with various groups having access to governmental officials and the political process, ensuring that no single group is dominant or able to consistently impose its will on others. This model suggests that policy outcomes are the result of bargaining, compromise, and coalition-building among these diverse groups, each advocating for their own interests. Pluralism emphasises the role of voluntary associations, interest groups, and a relatively open political system in preventing the concentration of power and promoting a balance of influence among different segments of society. It contrasts with the elite model, which argues that a small, cohesive group holds the majority of power.
Political_Ideologies_And_Movement represents organised belief systems, value frameworks, and collective action initiatives that seek to shape political discourse, influence policy outcomes, and transform social and economic arrangements. This category encompasses both systematic ideological frameworks that provide comprehensive worldviews and organised movements that mobilise collective action around specific goals or grievances. These entities function as realizable potentials that can be activated under appropriate social and political conditions, manifesting in political campaigns, policy reforms, institutional changes, and social transformation. Ideological frameworks provide coherent sets of beliefs about how society should be organised, the proper role of government, and the relationship between individual freedom and collective welfare. Social movements represent organised efforts to challenge existing power structures, advocate for marginalised groups, or promote alternative visions of social organisation. The category recognises that political change emerges from the dynamic interaction between ideas and organised action, with movements serving as vehicles for translating ideological commitments into concrete political outcomes and policy changes.
Political socialisation is the lifelong process through which individuals acquire their political attitudes, beliefs, values, and develop patterns of political behaviour, learning about the political system and their role within it. This process begins early in life with influences from family, schools, peers, and the media, and continues throughout adulthood as individuals interact with political institutions and participate in political activities. Political socialisation shapes individuals' understanding of political ideologies, their party affiliations, their views on public issues, and their levels of political engagement.
A political system is the social institution within a society that relies on a recognised set of procedures and structures for implementing and achieving the collective goals of a group or society, particularly those related to power, authority, and governance. It encompasses the government, political parties, interest groups, and the broader political culture, including the norms, values, and beliefs that shape political behaviour and decision-making processes. The political system is responsible for making and enforcing rules, resolving conflicts, and allocating resources within a society.
Political_Systems_And_Governance_Form encompasses the fundamental organisational structures and institutional arrangements through which political authority is exercised, legitimated, and maintained within societies. This category represents the core architectural frameworks that define how power is distributed, exercised, and constrained in political communities. These systems establish the basic rules and procedures for collective decision-making, the selection of leaders, and the relationship between governing institutions and citizens. The category includes both democratic forms that emphasise popular participation and consent, as well as traditional forms like monarchies that derive legitimacy from historical precedent and hereditary succession. Each system embodies different principles regarding the source of political authority, the mechanisms of accountability, and the balance between individual rights and collective governance. These governance forms represent realizable entities that can be instantiated in different societies and historical contexts, each carrying specific potentials for political participation, representation, and the exercise of state power. The category captures the diversity of ways human societies have organised political authority while recognizing common patterns in institutional design and legitimation.
Politics, in Harold D. Lasswell's classic definition, is fundamentally about "who gets what, when, and how," highlighting the struggle for power and resources within a society and the processes through which decisions are made about their distribution and allocation. It involves the exercise of power and influence to shape policies, make collective decisions, and resolve conflicts over competing interests and values. Politics operates at various levels, from interpersonal relationships and small groups to national and international arenas, and is a central aspect of social organisation and governance.
Polyandry is a specific form of polygamy in which a woman has more than one husband at the same time. This type of marriage is less common than polygyny (where a man has multiple wives) and is found in certain cultures around the world, often associated with specific economic or social conditions, such as limited land resources or the need to maintain family size in challenging environments. Different forms of polyandry exist, including fraternal polyandry, where a woman marries a group of brothers.
Polygamy is a form of marriage in which an individual is legally or socially permitted to have more than one spouse simultaneously. It can take two main forms: polygyny, where a man has multiple wives, and polyandry, where a woman has multiple husbands. While monogamy (marriage to one spouse at a time) is the most common form of marriage globally, polygamy is practiced in some cultures and religions around the world, often with specific social, economic, or religious justifications.
Polygyny is a specific form of polygamy in which a man is allowed to have more than one wife at the same time. This practice is more common than polyandry and is found in various cultures and religions around the world, often associated with factors such as social status, economic advantages, or religious beliefs that permit or encourage it. The relationships within polygynous marriages can vary widely depending on cultural norms and individual circumstances.
Polytheism is the belief in the existence of two or more gods or deities, who are often seen as having distinct powers, responsibilities, and domains over various aspects of the natural world and human life. This belief system was prevalent in many ancient civilisations and continues to exist in some cultures and religions today. Polytheism contrasts with monotheism, the belief in one God, and atheism, the disbelief in gods. The pantheons of gods in polytheistic religions often have complex relationships and hierarchies, with different gods being worshipped for different purposes or in different contexts.
In the context of social research, the population refers to the entire group of people who are the focus of a study or survey and about whom the researcher wants to draw conclusions. The population can be defined by specific characteristics, such as age, gender, ethnicity, geographic location, or membership in a particular group. Due to practical constraints, researchers often study a smaller subset of the population, known as a sample, and then generalise their findings from the sample back to the larger population, provided that the sample is representative of the population as a whole. Defining the target population clearly is a crucial step in the research design process.
Population_And_Demographic_Study encompasses academic disciplines that examine human populations through quantitative and qualitative analysis of demographic processes, life course dynamics, and population structures. This interdisciplinary domain integrates statistical analysis with social theory to understand how populations change over time and space, examining fundamental demographic processes and their social implications. The field employs sophisticated methodological approaches to analyse population data, demographic transitions, and cohort effects across different societies and historical periods. These disciplines contribute essential knowledge for understanding societal transformations, resource allocation challenges, and the social consequences of demographic shifts. They provide critical insights into how population structures influence social institutions, economic systems, and policy development. The domain bridges quantitative demographic analysis with sociological understanding of how population changes affect social organisation, intergenerational relationships, and societal adaptation. This knowledge base is increasingly vital for addressing contemporary challenges related to population aging, demographic transitions, and the social implications of changing population structures in both developed and developing societies.
Population_And_Research_Aggregate encompasses collective entities defined for analytical and research purposes, including both naturally occurring populations and methodologically constructed groups used in social research and policy analysis. These aggregates represent how social scientists and policymakers create categories and samples to understand social phenomena, test theories, and develop policies. They include both target populations that researchers seek to understand and specific methodological tools used to study social processes. These aggregates demonstrate the intersection between social reality and social research, showing how analytical categories and research methods shape our understanding of social phenomena. They are essential for understanding how social knowledge is produced and how research findings are used to inform policy and social intervention.
Population_Movement_And_Migration_Process encompasses the systematic spatial movements of individuals and groups across geographic boundaries that reshape demographic patterns and social composition of societies. These processes involve both voluntary and involuntary movements of people driven by economic, political, social, and environmental factors. They include comprehensive frameworks for understanding population movement as well as specific forms of migration and diaspora formation. These processes fundamentally alter the demographic landscape of both sending and receiving areas, creating new patterns of cultural diversity, economic relationships, and social integration challenges. They involve complex interactions between individual agency, structural constraints, and macro-level forces that shape contemporary globalisation. Understanding these processes is essential for analysing demographic change, cultural transformation, and the social consequences of human mobility in an increasingly interconnected world.
A population pyramid, also known as an age-sex pyramid, is a specialised type of bar chart that visually shows the distribution of a population by gender (males and females) and age groups at a specific point in time. It typically consists of two horizontal bar graphs, one for males and one for females, placed back-to-back along a central vertical axis representing age cohorts, usually in five-year intervals. The length of each horizontal bar represents the percentage or absolute number of people in that particular age group and gender category. The shape of the population pyramid can provide insights into a population's demographic structure, including its age distribution, sex ratio, and potential for future growth or decline, reflecting factors such as birth rates, death rates, and migration patterns.
Positivism, in sociology, is a theoretical approach that advocates for the study of the social world using the principles and methods of natural science, emphasizing empirical observation, objective measurement, comparison, and experimentation to produce objective knowledge about society. Positivists believe that social phenomena can be studied scientifically, just like natural phenomena, and that sociological research should aim to identify objective facts and patterns in social life, often relying on quantitative data and statistical analysis to uncover causal relationships and generalizable laws governing social behaviour. This approach seeks to establish sociology as a rigorous and evidence-based discipline, grounded in empirical evidence rather than speculation or subjective interpretation.
Post-Fordism is a general term used to describe the transition from mass industrial production, which was characterised by Fordist methods of standardised production, assembly lines, and economies of scale, to more flexible and diversified forms of production that favour innovation, cater to niche markets, and are aimed at meeting increasingly differentiated market demands for customised and higher-quality products. This shift, which began in the late 20th century, is associated with advancements in technology, such as automation and computerisation, as well as changes in consumer preferences and global economic competition. Post-Fordist production systems often involve greater flexibility in production processes, the use of advanced technologies to allow for product variation, a more skilled and adaptable workforce, and a focus on quality and innovation rather than just mass quantity.
A postindustrial city is an urban center in which the economy is dominated by global finance, the electronic flow of information, technology, services, and consumption, rather than traditional manufacturing and industrial activities. These cities often serve as hubs for financial institutions, corporate headquarters, research and development, and high-technology industries, playing a central role in the global knowledge economy. The landscape and social structure of postindustrial cities may reflect this shift, with a decline in industrial areas and a growth in office buildings, service-oriented businesses, and residential areas catering to a more diverse and often highly skilled workforce.
Postmodernism is a broad intellectual and cultural movement characterised by the belief that society is no longer governed by grand narratives of history or progress, universal truths, or objective realities. Postmodern society is seen as highly pluralistic and diverse, with a multiplicity of perspectives, identities, and fragmented realities, and no single overarching ideology or "grand narrative" guiding its development or providing a unified sense of meaning. Postmodern thought often emphasises relativism, skepticism towards authority and traditional institutions, and the social construction of knowledge and reality. It highlights the role of language, power, and discourse in shaping our understanding of the world and challenges the idea of objective truth in favour of multiple, subjective interpretations.
Poststructuralism is a theoretical approach to social science that originated from the field of linguistics and gained prominence in sociology through the work of thinkers like Michel Foucault. Poststructuralists critically examine the underlying structures of meaning and power in society, rejecting the structuralist idea that there are fixed, universal structures that determine social phenomena. Instead, they argue that meaning is fluid, context-dependent, and constantly being constructed and deconstructed through language and discourse. Poststructuralism challenges the notion that absolute truths about the world can be definitively discovered, asserting that multiple interpretations of reality are inevitable and shaped by power relations and social contexts. It emphasises the instability of meaning and the importance of analysing how power operates through language and social practices.
Poverty refers to a state of deprivation where individuals or families lack the sufficient financial resources or material possessions to meet their basic needs or maintain a living standard considered customary in their society. This broad category encompasses various forms, most commonly distinguished as absolute poverty and relative poverty. Absolute poverty, also known as subsistence poverty, defines a condition where individuals lack the minimal resources required for basic survival, such as food, shelter, warmth, and safety, often measured by a fixed income threshold. Relative poverty, conversely, defines deprivation in relation to the living standards and average income levels of the majority within a particular society, implying social exclusion and a reduced ability to participate fully in customary activities. The feminisation of poverty highlights the increasing proportion of women among the poor. Poverty is a complex social problem influenced by economic systems, social inequalities, access to resources, and various structural and individual factors, leading to significant social and health consequences.
Power, in its most fundamental sociological sense, is the ability of an individual or group to exercise their will over others, even in the face of resistance, and to bring about desired outcomes or to prevent undesired ones. Power can manifest in various forms, including political power, economic power, social power, and cultural power, and it can be based on different sources such as authority, force, influence, or control over resources. The study of power is central to sociology, as it underlies social inequalities, shapes social interactions, and drives social change. Sociologists analyse how power is distributed, how it is used and contested, and its impact on individuals, groups, and social structures.
Power elite is a term popularised by sociologist C. Wright Mills to describe a relatively small, tightly knit group of individuals who occupy the top positions in the dominant institutions of American society—namely, the military, the industrial (corporate) sector, and the government—and who collectively hold the most power and make key decisions that shape the fate of the United States. According to Mills, these elites share similar backgrounds, interests, and worldviews, and their decisions have far-reaching consequences for the rest of the population, often operating outside of traditional democratic processes and accountability. The theory of the power elite suggests that power in modern industrial societies is concentrated rather than widely dispersed.
A preindustrial city is characterised by a relatively small population, often consisting of only a few thousand people living within its borders, and a social structure marked by a relatively closed class system with limited opportunities for social mobility. These cities typically have an economy based on agriculture, trade, or small-scale manufacturing, with social status largely determined by ascribed characteristics such as birth, family connections, and land ownership rather than individual achievement. The pace of social and economic change in preindustrial cities is generally slower compared to industrial or post-industrial cities, and social life is often more traditional and community-oriented, with less anonymity and more face-to-face interaction.
Prejudice refers to the act of holding preconceived ideas or attitudes about an individual or a group of people, which are often based on limited information or stereotypes and are resistant to change even when confronted with new evidence or contradictory information. Prejudice can be either positive, involving favourable preconceived notions, or negative, involving unfavourable ones, but it often leads to biased judgments and unfair treatment of individuals based on their group affiliation rather than their personal characteristics. It is a key component of discrimination and can be rooted in various social factors, including social learning, conformity to group norms, and the need to justify social inequalities.
Prestige in sociology refers to the level of respect, admiration, and social honor that an occupation or social position holds within a society. Different occupations are typically ranked differently in terms of prestige based on factors such as the perceived importance of the work, the level of education or skill required, the income associated with the occupation, and the social status of those who typically hold the position. High-prestige occupations often command more respect and social standing, which can influence individuals' social interactions, opportunities, and overall position within the social hierarchy. Sociologists often study occupational prestige to understand how societies value different types of work and how these valuations contribute to social stratification.
Prevalence, in the context of studying disorders, diseases, or social phenomena within a population, refers to the total number of cases (both new and existing) of a specific condition or characteristic that exist in that population at a particular point in time or during a specified period. It provides a snapshot of how widespread a condition is within a population at a given time and is often expressed as a proportion or percentage of the population. Prevalence is influenced by both the rate at which new cases occur (incidence) and the duration of the condition. It is a key measure used in public health and sociology to understand the extent of social or health issues and to plan interventions and resource allocation.
Primary_And_Intimate_Group represents the most fundamental and emotionally significant social aggregates characterised by face-to-face interaction, emotional intimacy, and strong personal bonds among members. These groups typically involve small numbers of individuals who know each other personally and interact regularly in informal, spontaneous, and deeply meaningful ways. They serve crucial functions in socialisation, emotional support, identity formation, and the transmission of values and norms. The relationships within these groups are often diffuse and multifaceted rather than focused on specific tasks or objectives. These aggregates provide the foundational social experiences that shape individual personality, self-concept, and basic social skills, representing the most immediate and influential social environment for most individuals throughout their lives.
A primary group is a small social group characterised by intimate, face-to-face association and cooperation among its members, fostering close, personal, and often emotional relationships. These groups, such as family members, close friends, or a tightly knit group of peers, are typically characterised by a strong sense of belonging, mutual support, and shared activities and experiences. Interactions within primary groups are often informal, spontaneous, and deeply personal, playing a crucial role in the socialisation process, the development of self-identity, and the provision of emotional well-being for their members.
Primary socialisation is the fundamental process by which children learn the basic cultural norms, values, beliefs, language, and behaviours of the society into which they are born, primarily occurring within the family and close-knit social environments during their early years. Through interaction with primary caregivers and other close family members, children develop their initial sense of self, learn how to communicate, and internalise the foundational norms and expectations of their culture, which are essential for functioning within that society. This stage of socialisation lays the groundwork for future learning and social development.
Production_And_Organisational_Economic_Model represents specific approaches to organizing production processes, manufacturing systems, and economic activities within broader economic frameworks. These realizable entities focus on the operational and organisational aspects of economic production rather than comprehensive societal economic arrangements. They include both traditional production methods and modern industrial approaches that emphasise efficiency, standardisation, and technological advancement. These models demonstrate how societies have developed different strategies for organizing work, managing resources, and coordinating productive activities. They highlight the evolution from simple subsistence-based production to complex industrial and post-industrial systems. Understanding these models is crucial for analysing how technological advancement, organisational innovation, and economic development shape work experiences, productivity, and social relationships within economic systems.
The profane, in the sociological study of religion, refers to the ordinary, mundane, and commonplace elements of everyday life that are considered secular and lack special religious significance or sacredness. This concept, contrasted with the sacred, encompasses the routine activities, objects, and experiences that are part of the everyday world and do not inspire the same sense of awe, reverence, or spiritual connection associated with the sacred. The distinction between the sacred and the profane is central to understanding how societies create and maintain religious beliefs and practices, with the sacred often being set apart and treated with special respect.
A professional criminal is a person who pursues criminal activity as their primary day-to-day occupation and source of income, developing specialised skills, techniques, and a certain level of status and recognition within the criminal underworld. Unlike amateur or occasional offenders, professional criminals often plan their crimes carefully, work in organised groups or networks, and may have a long-term commitment to a life of crime. They often develop a code of conduct and may view their criminal activities as a career, acquiring expertise in specific types of crime such as theft, fraud, drug trafficking, or gambling.
Proletariat, in the theoretical framework of Karl Marx, refers to the working class in a capitalist society who do not own the means of production (such as factories, land, and capital) and must therefore sell their labor power to the bourgeoisie (the capitalist class who own the means of production) in order to earn a living and survive. According to Marx, the proletariat is exploited by the bourgeoisie, who extract surplus value from their labor in the form of profit, leading to inherent class conflict and the potential for the proletariat to develop class consciousness and ultimately overthrow the capitalist system.
The public sphere is a concept associated with the German sociologist Jürgen Habermas, referring to the arena of public debate and discussion in modern societies where individuals can come together to freely discuss and form opinions about matters of general interest and concern, ideally independent of state control or economic pressures. Habermas envisioned the public sphere as a space for rational-critical discourse, where citizens could exchange ideas, critique power structures, and participate in the formation of public opinion, which could then influence political action and policy-making. This sphere is not necessarily a physical place but rather a discursive space that can exist in various forms, such as through media, public gatherings, and online platforms, where reasoned arguments and open dialogue are central to the process of shaping collective understanding and political will. The ideal of the public sphere emphasises accessibility, inclusivity, and the free exchange of ideas among informed citizens.
In the early study of global migration, push and pull factors were identified as the internal and external forces believed to significantly influence patterns of migration. 'Push factors' refer to the dynamics and conditions within the country of origin that compel people to leave, such as high rates of unemployment, economic hardship, war or conflict, famine or natural disasters, political persecution, or lack of opportunities. 'Pull factors' describe the features and characteristics of destination countries that attract migrants, such as a buoyant labor market with available jobs, higher wages, lower population density, a higher standard of living, better educational or healthcare opportunities, political stability, or the presence of established communities of migrants from the same origin country. While this model provides a basic framework for understanding migration decisions, contemporary migration studies recognise that the process is often more complex and influenced by a wider range of interconnected factors, including social networks, government policies, and individual agency.
Qualitative research is a research approach that primarily relies on data that is not numerical and often involves studying social phenomena in their natural settings or "in the field" rather than in controlled laboratory environments. This type of research seeks to understand the qualities, characteristics, and meanings of social phenomena through methods such as observation, interviews, and the analysis of texts or artifacts. The focus is often on exploring the depth and complexity of experiences, perspectives, and social processes, rather than on quantifying them through statistical data. Qualitative research aims to provide rich, descriptive insights into the social world and the ways in which people interpret and make sense of their experiences.
Qualitative_Research_Approaches_And_Method encompasses methodological approaches that prioritise depth, context, and understanding of social phenomena through non-numerical data collection and analysis. These methods emphasise the subjective experiences, meanings, and interpretations that individuals attach to their social world. Biographical and life history approaches focus on individual narratives and personal experiences across time, while ethnographic methods involve immersive fieldwork to understand cultural practices and social dynamics. Documentary research analyses existing texts and materials to uncover social patterns and historical contexts. Dramaturgical approaches examine social interaction through theatrical metaphors, exploring how individuals present themselves and manage impressions in social situations. These methods share a commitment to capturing the richness and complexity of social life, often employing techniques like in-depth interviews, participant observation, and narrative analysis. They provide holistic, contextual understanding of social phenomena that complements quantitative approaches by revealing the underlying meanings and processes that shape human behaviour and social structures.
Qualitative research methods are those sociological methods that primarily focus on gathering in-depth, detailed, and rich data, often in non-numerical form, with the primary aim of gaining a better understanding of the social phenomena being studied from the perspectives of the individuals or groups involved. These methods often involve exploring the 'why' and 'how' of social issues rather than just the 'what' or 'how many' that quantitative methods typically address. Common qualitative research methods include in-depth interviews, focus groups, participant observation, ethnography, and the analysis of textual or visual data. The goal of qualitative research is to provide a holistic and contextual understanding of social phenomena, uncovering meanings, patterns, and experiences in a detailed and nuanced way.
A quality circle is a type of industrialised group production or work team, often found in manufacturing or service industries, where workers who are involved in a particular area of work come together regularly to use their collective expertise and knowledge to actively participate in problem-solving, decision-making, and continuous improvement processes related to the quality of products, services, or work processes. These circles typically involve a small group of employees who meet voluntarily and are trained in problem-solving techniques to identify, analyse, and propose solutions to work-related issues, aiming to enhance efficiency, productivity, and the quality of outcomes by leveraging the insights and experiences of those directly involved in the work.
Quantitative_Research_And_Data_Collection_Method represents systematic approaches to gathering and analysing numerical data to identify patterns, test hypotheses, and make generalizable conclusions about social phenomena. These methods emphasise measurement, statistical analysis, and the ability to quantify relationships between variables across populations. Survey research forms a cornerstone of this category, collecting standardised data from representative samples through questionnaires and interviews. Content analysis provides systematic coding of communication materials, while comparative research enables cross-cultural and cross-national analysis. Secondary analysis leverages existing datasets for new research questions, making efficient use of previously collected information. Victimisation surveys and vital statistics represent specialised data collection approaches for specific social domains. Mixed methods bridge qualitative and quantitative traditions, combining numerical precision with contextual understanding. These approaches prioritise reliability, validity, and replicability, enabling researchers to identify statistical relationships, test causal hypotheses, and produce findings that can inform evidence-based policy decisions and theoretical development in sociology.
Quantitative research methods are those sociological methods that primarily focus on collecting and analysing social phenomena using numerical data, mathematical models, statistical techniques, and computational methods to measure and quantify social patterns, relationships between variables, and the strength and direction of these relationships. These methods often involve the use of surveys with closed-ended questions, experiments with controlled variables, and the analysis of large datasets to identify trends, test hypotheses, and make generalisations about populations. The goal of quantitative research is often to establish statistical significance, identify causal relationships, and produce findings that can be generalised to a larger population.
Queer theory is a critical perspective that emerged in the early 1990s, primarily within sociology, gender studies, and literary theory, arguing that traditional academic disciplines, including sociology, often operate with inherent biases and assumptions that favour heterosexuality (heteronormativity) and binary understandings of sex and gender. Queer theory challenges these heterosexual assumptions that underlie much contemporary thinking about sexuality, gender, and identity, advocating for the foregrounding and validation of non-heterosexual voices, experiences, and perspectives. It questions fixed categories of sexual orientation and gender identity, emphasizing the fluidity, diversity, and social construction of these concepts and seeking to deconstruct normative understandings of sexuality and gender in order to challenge power structures and promote inclusivity.
A questionnaire is a research instrument consisting of a series of written questions that a researcher supplies to subjects or respondents, typically in a written or digital format, requesting their responses to gather data on their attitudes, beliefs, behaviours, or characteristics. Questionnaires can include various types of questions, such as multiple-choice, true/false, rating scales, and open-ended questions, depending on the research objectives and the type of information being sought. They are a widely used method in survey research for collecting data from a large number of people in a standardised way, allowing for statistical analysis of the responses. The design of a questionnaire, including the wording, order, and format of questions, is crucial for obtaining accurate and reliable data.
A racial group is a category of people who are set apart from others within a society primarily because of obvious physical differences that are perceived as socially significant and are used to define group membership and often to justify differential treatment and social hierarchies. These perceived physical differences are not inherently meaningful but become socially significant when a society defines them as such and uses them as a basis for categorizing people and assigning them to different social positions, often leading to inequalities in power, privilege, and status. The concept of racial groups is closely tied to the social construction of race and the social processes of racialisation, where certain physical characteristics are imbued with social meaning and used to create racial categories that have real social consequences.
Racism is the attribution of characteristics of superiority or inferiority to a population sharing certain physically inherited characteristics, often leading to prejudice, discrimination, and the belief in the inherent superiority of one race over others. It is a complex system of power and ideology that operates at individual, interpersonal, and institutional levels, based on the social construction of racial categories and the belief that these categories are biologically real and associated with distinct traits, abilities, or moral character. Racism can manifest as overt acts of discrimination and hate speech, as well as in more subtle forms of bias embedded in social structures, policies, and practices that perpetuate racial inequalities in areas such as education, employment, housing, and the criminal justice system. It is a pervasive and harmful social phenomenon with deep historical roots and lasting consequences for individuals and societies.
A random sample is a subset of individuals or cases selected from a larger population for research purposes, where every member of the entire population has an equal chance of being selected into the sample. This method of sampling aims to create a sample that is representative of the population from which it is drawn, allowing researchers to generalise their findings from the sample to the larger population with a certain degree of confidence. Achieving a truly random sample requires a well-defined population and a method of selection that ensures every member has an equal and independent probability of being included, such as using a random number generator or drawing names from a complete list of the population.
Random sampling is a specific type of sampling method used in research where a sample of participants or cases is chosen from a larger population in such a way that every member of the population has a known and equal probability of being included in the sample. This technique is fundamental to probability sampling and is used to ensure that the sample is as representative as possible of the population from which it is drawn, minimizing sampling bias and allowing researchers to make statistical inferences about the population based on the sample data. Various methods can be used to achieve random sampling, such as simple random sampling, stratified random sampling, and cluster sampling, depending on the characteristics of the population and the research design.
Rationalisation is a concept extensively used by Max Weber to refer to the multifaceted process by which modes of precise calculation, efficiency-oriented organisation, and action based on abstract rules, laws, and procedures increasingly come to dominate the social world, replacing more traditional, emotional, or value-driven forms of social organisation and behaviour. This process is a central theme in Weber's analysis of modernity and is closely linked to the rise of bureaucracy, capitalism, and science. Rationalisation involves a shift towards systematic thinking, the application of reason and logic to social life, and an emphasis on predictability and control through formal structures and procedures. While it has led to advancements in technology, efficiency, and administration, Weber also cautioned about the potential negative consequences of rationalisation, such as the disenchantment of the world and the dominance of impersonal bureaucratic structures.
Rationalisation of society, a key concept in the work of Max Weber, refers to the historical and ongoing process by which traditional, emotional, or value-based modes of thought and social organisation are increasingly replaced by rational, logical, efficient, and calculable approaches based on scientific knowledge, abstract rules, and bureaucratic procedures as the dominant mode of human thought and social structuring in modern societies. Weber saw this process as a defining characteristic of modernity, influencing various aspects of social life, including the economy, law, politics, and religion, leading to the development of bureaucratic institutions and a focus on efficiency and instrumental reason. While rationalisation has brought about progress in many areas, Weber also warned of its potential negative consequences, such as the "iron cage" of bureaucracy and the loss of meaning and individual freedom.
Rationality, in a sociological context, refers to deliberate, matter-of-fact calculation of the most efficient means to accomplish a particular goal or achieve a desired outcome, often involving logical thinking, systematic planning, and the careful consideration of costs and benefits. It emphasises the use of reason and logic to make decisions and solve problems, prioritizing efficiency and effectiveness in achieving specific objectives. Max Weber distinguished between different types of rationality, including instrumental rationality (focused on the efficient pursuit of goals), value rationality (guided by ethical or moral beliefs), traditional rationality (based on customs and habits), and affectual rationality (driven by emotions). The increasing dominance of instrumental rationality is a key aspect of Weber's theory of the rationalisation of society.
Real culture, in contrast to ideal culture, refers to the actual social patterns, behaviours, customs, and practices that people in a society exhibit in their everyday lives, which may often deviate from or only approximate the cultural expectations, norms, and values that are formally espoused or idealised by that society. While ideal culture represents the norms and values that a society publicly endorses and strives for, real culture reflects how people actually behave in practice, which can include inconsistencies, contradictions, and a selective adherence to the ideal norms. The gap between ideal and real culture is a common area of sociological study, highlighting the complexities of social life and the fact that what people say they believe or do may not always align with their actual behaviour.
Reflexivity in sociology describes the ongoing connections and mutual influence between social life and the knowledge we gain about it; the very act of studying and understanding society can subsequently affect the way individuals and groups behave within it. For instance, if a survey reveals a high level of public support for a particular political party, this knowledge might lead some individuals to express their own support for that party, either to align with the perceived majority or because the information itself influences their opinion. Similarly, sociological research on the effects of labeling can lead to changes in how institutions approach and treat individuals labeled as deviant, potentially altering the outcomes for those individuals. Reflexivity highlights the dynamic and interactive relationship between social research and the social world it seeks to understand, emphasizing that sociological knowledge is not always neutral or detached but can have real-world consequences on social actions and perceptions.
Refugee are people who have been forced to flee their own country due to well-founded fears of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion, or to avoid war, widespread violence, or other circumstances that gravely endanger their lives, safety, or freedom. Unlike economic migrants who choose to move primarily for economic reasons, refugees are compelled to leave their homes and seek protection in another country because it is unsafe for them to remain in their country of origin. They are often recognised and protected under international law, particularly the 1951 Refugee Convention, which outlines their rights and the obligations of host countries to provide them with asylum and protection.
Rehabilitation, in the context of criminology and sociology, refers to a planned and systematic program or process aimed at reforming an offender's attitudes, behaviours, and skills in order to reduce the likelihood of future offenses and facilitate their reintegration into society as law-abiding citizens. Rehabilitation programs can take various forms, including educational and vocational training, therapy and counseling to address underlying issues contributing to criminal behaviour (such as substance abuse or mental health problems), and restorative justice initiatives that focus on repairing the harm caused by the crime and promoting empathy and accountability. The goal of rehabilitation is to address the root causes of crime and provide offenders with the tools and support they need to lead productive and crime-free lives upon release from correctional facilities or completion of their sentences.
Reincarnation is a religious or philosophical belief, most often associated with Hinduism and Buddhism, that the soul or spirit of a person, after death, is reborn in another body or form, which could be another human being, an animal, or even a plant, in a cycle of birth, death, and rebirth. The specific details and beliefs about reincarnation vary across different religious and philosophical traditions, often involving concepts such as karma, where one's actions in past lives influence their future rebirths, and the ultimate goal of liberation from this cycle of reincarnation. While reincarnation is primarily a religious concept, it has sociological relevance in understanding religious beliefs, cultural practices, and worldviews in societies where it is prevalent, influencing how people perceive life, death, and their place in the universe.
Relative deprivation is the thesis that people's subjective feelings of deprivation, discontent, or grievance are not absolute or based on an objective standard of poverty or need, but rather are relative to their assessment of themselves and their situation in comparison with others around them, particularly those they perceive as being more privileged or having more of what they desire. This feeling of being disadvantaged can arise even when one's basic needs are met, if one believes they are unfairly lacking in comparison to a relevant reference group or societal standards. The experience of relative deprivation can be a significant factor in social unrest, the formation of social movements, and the expression of social discontent, as people strive to achieve what they perceive as equitable or just in relation to others.
Relative poverty refers to a floating standard of deprivation by which people at the bottom of a society, whatever their absolute lifestyles or level of material comfort, are judged to be disadvantaged and lacking in comparison with the overall standards and average lifestyle of the nation or society as a whole. This measure of poverty is not based on a fixed threshold of basic needs but rather on the relative economic position of individuals or households within their social context. It acknowledges that what is considered a minimally acceptable standard of living can vary across different societies and change over time, and that poverty is not just about lacking the bare necessities for survival but also about being excluded from the ordinary living patterns, customs, and amenities that are considered customary in the society in which one belongs.
Reliability is the extent to which a measurement instrument, test, or research procedure consistently provides the same or very similar results each time it is used under the same conditions, indicating the stability and dependability of the measurement. A reliable measure is one that is free from significant random error, meaning that the scores or observations obtained are consistent and not due to chance variations in the measurement process. In social science research, reliability is a crucial aspect of the quality of data, as it ensures that the findings are consistent and can be trusted. Different methods are used to assess reliability, such as test-retest reliability (consistency over time), internal consistency (consistency across items within a measure), and inter-rater reliability (consistency across different researchers using the measure).
Religion is a complex and multifaceted social institution that involves a set of beliefs adhered to by the members of a community, typically involving symbols that are regarded with a sense of awe, wonder, or the sacred, along with ritual practices in which members of the community collectively engage to express and reinforce their shared beliefs and values. It often provides a framework for understanding the world, the meaning of life, and the nature of ultimate reality, and can include a moral code, a system of ethics, and a sense of community among believers. Religious beliefs are statements or doctrines to which members of a particular religion adhere, providing a cognitive framework for their faith. Religious experience refers to the subjective feeling or perception of being in direct contact with the ultimate reality, such as a divine being, or of being overcome by intense religious emotion, often considered a powerful and transformative aspect of religious life. Religious rituals are the practices, ceremonies, and behaviours that are required or expected of members of a faith, often performed collectively and imbued with symbolic meaning, serving to reinforce beliefs, create social bonds, and connect individuals to the sacred.
Religious beliefs are the specific statements, doctrines, tenets, and convictions to which members of a particular religion adhere, providing a framework for understanding the nature of the divine, the purpose of life, morality, and the relationship between humanity and the sacred. These beliefs often form the core of a religion's teachings and can be found in sacred texts, traditions, and the pronouncements of religious leaders. They offer explanations for fundamental questions about existence, the universe, and humanity's place within it, and they often guide the behaviour and practices of believers. Religious beliefs can vary widely between different religions and even within different denominations or sects of the same religion, encompassing a diverse range of ideas about God or gods, the afterlife, the origins of the world, and ethical principles.
Religious experience refers to the subjective feeling, perception, or sense of being in direct contact with what is considered the ultimate reality, the sacred, or a divine being, or of being profoundly overcome by intense religious emotion, awe, or spiritual insight. These experiences are often deeply personal and can range from feelings of peace, joy, and unity to moments of profound revelation, mystical encounters, or a sense of the presence of the transcendent. Religious experiences are considered by many believers to be powerful confirmations of their faith and can play a significant role in shaping their religious lives and practices. The interpretation and significance of religious experiences can vary greatly depending on the individual's religious background, cultural context, and personal understanding.
Religious_Organisation encompasses collective entities formed around shared spiritual beliefs, religious practices, and faith traditions that provide meaning, community, and moral guidance to their members. These aggregates vary in their relationship to broader society, from established institutions that are well-integrated into mainstream culture to newer movements that may challenge conventional religious practices. They serve multiple functions including spiritual instruction, community support, ritual facilitation, and moral authority within their respective communities. The diversity within this category reflects different approaches to religious organisation, from hierarchical institutional structures to more informal or innovative religious movements. These organisations play crucial roles in transmitting religious traditions, providing social support networks, and offering frameworks for understanding life's fundamental questions and moral challenges.
Religious rituals are the formal practices, ceremonies, and behaviours that are required or expected of members of a particular faith or religious community, often performed in a prescribed manner and at specific times or places. These rituals are imbued with symbolic meaning and serve various functions, such as expressing and reinforcing religious beliefs, connecting individuals and communities to the sacred, commemorating important events or myths, marking life transitions, and fostering social cohesion among believers. Religious rituals can include prayer, worship services, sacraments, pilgrimages, festivals, and other communal acts that help to enact and embody the core tenets and values of a religion.
Replication in research is the process of repeating a study or experiment by other researchers, often independently, to determine whether the original findings can be reproduced and are reliable across different settings, samples, or conditions. If a study's results can be consistently replicated by other researchers, it increases confidence in the validity and generalizability of the original findings, strengthening the scientific rigor of the research. Failure to replicate findings can raise questions about the original study's methodology, potential biases, or the robustness of its conclusions.
Representative democracy is a political system in which decisions affecting a community or society as a whole are not taken directly by its members but rather by a smaller group of people whom they have elected through a process of voting to represent their interests and make decisions on their behalf. This form of democracy is common in large and complex societies where direct participation by all citizens in every decision may be impractical. Elected representatives are typically accountable to their constituents and may be removed from office through regular elections if they fail to represent their interests effectively.
A representative sample is a selection of individuals or cases drawn from a larger population that is statistically found to be typical of that population in terms of key characteristics relevant to the study, such as age, gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or opinions. The goal of obtaining a representative sample is to ensure that the findings from the sample can be generalised with a reasonable degree of accuracy to the entire population from which the sample was drawn, allowing researchers to make broader inferences and conclusions about the population as a whole. Various sampling techniques, including random sampling, stratified sampling, and cluster sampling, are used to try to achieve a representative sample.
A research design is a detailed and systematic plan or method developed by a researcher for obtaining data scientifically to address a specific research question or test a hypothesis. It outlines the overall strategy of the research, including the type of study (e.g., experiment, survey, ethnography, case study), the methods of data collection (e.g., questionnaires, interviews, observations, analysis of existing data), the selection of participants or cases (sampling strategy), and the procedures for data analysis. A well-developed research design is crucial for ensuring that the research is valid, reliable, and capable of answering the research question effectively while minimizing bias and maximizing the rigor of the study.
Research_Design_And_Analytical_Process represents systematic approaches to structuring research investigations, testing hypotheses, and developing theoretical understanding from empirical evidence. These processes involve the careful design of research studies to maximise validity and reliability while addressing specific research questions. They include both experimental methods that manipulate variables to establish causal relationships and logical reasoning processes that move from specific observations to general theoretical conclusions. These processes emphasise the importance of systematic thinking, methodological rigor, and theoretical development in social research. They require researchers to consider issues of research design, variable control, and the relationship between empirical evidence and theoretical understanding. These processes are essential for advancing sociological knowledge and ensuring that research findings contribute meaningfully to scientific understanding.
Research_Design_And_Methodological_Principle encompasses the fundamental frameworks, guidelines, and logical structures that underpin rigorous sociological inquiry. This category includes the foundational elements of scientific research design, from hypothesis formulation and operational definition of concepts to the establishment of causal relationships through systematic investigation. The scientific method provides the overarching framework for conducting objective, replicable research, while research principles ensure ethical conduct and methodological rigor. Applied social research connects academic inquiry to practical problem-solving, emphasizing the translation of findings into actionable solutions for social issues. Causal logic and causation represent critical analytical concepts for understanding relationships between variables and establishing explanatory frameworks. These principles guide researchers in developing coherent research strategies, selecting appropriate methods, and maintaining standards of validity and reliability. The category emphasises the importance of systematic planning, logical reasoning, and methodological transparency in producing credible knowledge that can advance sociological theory and inform evidence-based practice in addressing complex social challenges.
Research methods encompass the diverse range of specific techniques, procedures, and tools that are used by researchers in various disciplines, including sociology, to gather empirical (factual) material or data that can be used to investigate social phenomena, test theories, and answer research questions. These methods can be broadly categorised into quantitative methods, which focus on numerical data and statistical analysis (e.g., surveys, experiments), and qualitative methods, which focus on non-numerical data and in-depth understanding (e.g., interviews, observations, content analysis). The choice of research methods depends on the nature of the research question, the goals of the study, and the type of data needed to address the question effectively.
Research_Methodology_And_Validity_Quality represents characteristics related to the quality, accuracy, and reliability of social research methods and findings. These qualities include measures of research validity, reliability, objectivity, and the various methodological considerations that ensure the quality and credibility of social research. They encompass both the technical aspects of research design and the philosophical considerations about how social knowledge can be produced and validated. These qualities are crucial for ensuring that social research produces reliable and meaningful findings that can inform our understanding of social phenomena and guide policy and practice.
Research Principles refer to the fundamental guidelines, ideals, and ethical considerations that underpin the conduct of systematic inquiry in social science. This category encompasses core tenets that ensure the quality, integrity, and trustworthiness of research findings. Key principles include objectivity (striving for impartiality and freedom from bias in data interpretation), value neutrality (Max Weber's emphasis on sociologists setting aside personal values during research), reliability (consistency of measurement), validity (accuracy of measurement), and replicability (the ability for other researchers to repeat a study). It also covers ethical considerations such as informed consent, protection of participants' privacy, and responsible data management. These principles guide researchers in formulating hypotheses, designing studies, collecting and analysing data, and drawing conclusions, ensuring that sociological knowledge is produced through rigorous, transparent, and ethical means. Concepts like the Hawthorne effect (changes in behaviour due to being studied) and the need for applied social research (aiming to solve problems) also fall under this domain, reflecting the practical and methodological considerations in sociological investigation.
A research tool is a systematic and well-defined technique or instrument that is specifically designed and employed by researchers to collect, analyse, and interpret data in order to conduct research and answer their research questions in a rigorous and scientific manner. These tools can vary widely depending on the nature of the research, the type of data being sought, and the methodological approach being used, encompassing both quantitative tools like surveys, questionnaires, experiments, and statistical software, as well as qualitative tools such as interview guides, observation protocols, focus group discussion plans, and content analysis frameworks. The selection and appropriate application of research tools are crucial for ensuring the validity, reliability, and overall quality of the research findings.
Research_Validation_And_Quality_Assurance_Process encompasses methods for ensuring the reliability, validity, and credibility of social research through verification, replication, and examination of research effects. These processes focus on establishing confidence in research findings and identifying potential sources of bias or error that might compromise research quality. They include both systematic replication of studies to test the robustness of findings and investigation of how researcher and contextual factors might influence research outcomes. These processes are crucial for maintaining scientific standards and building cumulative knowledge in sociology. They address fundamental questions about the trustworthiness of research findings and the conditions under which social research can produce reliable knowledge. Understanding these processes is essential for both conducting high-quality research and critically evaluating the research conducted by others.
Residential_Patterns_And_Marriage_Rule encompasses the spatial and social regulatory mechanisms that govern where married couples establish households and whom they may legitimately marry. This class includes post-marital residence patterns (patrilocality, matrilocality, neo-locality) that determine family proximity and support networks, as well as marriage rules that define acceptable and prohibited partners (endogamy, exogamy, incest taboo). These patterns and rules work together to structure social space, maintain group boundaries, prevent genetic problems, and facilitate alliance formation between social groups. The interplay between residential choices and marriage regulations reflects how societies balance competing needs for family support, social integration, genetic health, and group identity while managing potential conflicts and maintaining social cohesion across generations.
Resocialisation is a profound process of discarding former behaviour patterns, values, norms, and beliefs that were learned in previous socialisation experiences and accepting new ones as part of a significant transition or change in an individual's life circumstances or social roles. This process often occurs when individuals move into a new social environment with drastically different norms and expectations, such as entering a total institution like a prison or a military boot camp, converting to a new religion, or undergoing a major life change like retirement or becoming a parent. Resocialisation can involve both unlearning old behaviours that are no longer appropriate or functional in the new context and internalizing new ways of thinking, feeling, and acting that are required for successful adaptation to the new social environment.
Resource mobilisation theory (RMT) is a major theoretical perspective in the study of social movements that emphasises the crucial role of resources—such as money, political influence, access to the media, personnel (volunteers and staff), and communication networks—in the emergence, growth, and success of social movements. RMT argues that grievances or social discontent are widespread and are not sufficient on their own to explain the development of social movements; rather, it is the ability of aggrieved groups to mobilise and effectively utilise various types of resources that determines whether a social movement will form and achieve its goals. This theory focuses on the strategic actions of social movement organisations in acquiring, organizing, and deploying resources to challenge existing power structures and bring about social change.
Responses to Deviance constitute a sociological category that examines the various ways in which societies, institutions, and individuals react to behaviours that violate social norms, rules, or laws. This domain explores the mechanisms and consequences of social control, both formal and informal, that aim to discourage deviant acts and maintain social order. It includes formal responses such as the processes and institutions of the criminal justice system (e.g., police, courts, prisons, capital punishment, incarceration) which apply sanctions and aim for rehabilitation or deterrence. Informal responses encompass social approval or disapproval, ridicule, gossip, and social ostracism from family, peers, and community. This category also considers concepts like the degradation ceremony, which can strip individuals of their former identities in total institutions, and stigma, a negative label that devalues members of deviant groups. Understanding these responses is crucial for analysing how societies define, manage, and react to deviance, and their impact on individuals and social structures.
Risk society is a concept developed by the German sociologist Ulrich Beck to describe the contemporary condition of society where industrial and technological advancements have created many new types of dangers and risks that were largely unknown in previous ages, characterised by their global scale, potential for catastrophic consequences, and often invisible or uncertain nature. Beck argues that in modern society, the primary risks we face are increasingly manufactured risks, which are not attributable to natural disasters but are the result of human decisions, actions, and technological development, such as the risks associated with global warming, nuclear power, genetically modified organisms, and widespread pollution. These risks often transcend national borders and can have long-term and potentially irreversible impacts, leading to a heightened sense of uncertainty and the need for new forms of social organisation and political action to manage and mitigate these complex and often systemic risks.
Role exit is the social process through which an individual disengages from a role that has been central to their self-identity and establishes a new identity associated with a different role. This process often involves a period of adjustment and can be challenging as individuals may experience a sense of loss, uncertainty, or even identity crisis as they relinquish a familiar role and take on a new one. Examples of role exit include retirement from a long-term career, divorce leading to the end of the spouse role, or recovery from a serious illness leading to a change in one's identity as a "sick" person. Role exit typically involves stages such as doubt, search for alternatives, the turning point where the decision to leave the role is made, and the creation of a new identity.
Role taking is a fundamental social psychological process, particularly emphasised in the symbolic interactionist perspective, that involves mentally assuming the perspective, attitudes, feelings, and expectations of another individual or a group, thereby enabling one to understand how they might think, feel, and respond in a particular situation and to adjust one's own behaviour accordingly. This ability to take the role of the other is crucial for effective communication, social interaction, empathy, and the development of a sense of self, as it allows individuals to anticipate others' reactions and to see themselves from an external viewpoint. George Herbert Mead highlighted the importance of role taking in the development of the self, suggesting that through taking on the roles of significant others and the generalised other, individuals develop a sense of social self and learn to navigate social situations.
Routine activities theory is a criminological perspective that suggests criminal victimisation is most likely to occur when there is a convergence in time and space of three minimal elements: a motivated offender, a suitable target, and the absence of capable guardianship (such as police, security personnel, or even bystanders). This theory focuses on the situational factors that increase the risk of crime rather than on the motivations of offenders or broad social inequalities. A suitable target can be a person or object that is attractive to a potential offender, while capable guardianship refers to any factors that could prevent the crime from happening. The theory posits that changes in routine activities, such as people spending more time away from home or carrying valuable items in public, can influence crime rates by altering the opportunities for offenders to find suitable targets without the presence of guardians.
The sacred, in the sociological study of religion, refers to those aspects of life, including objects, places, times, symbols, and beliefs, that inspire attitudes of awe, reverence, respect, and even fear among believers in a given set of religious ideas. The sacred is set apart from the ordinary and mundane aspects of everyday existence, which are considered profane. Émile Durkheim emphasised the fundamental distinction between the sacred and the profane as the basis of religious life, arguing that the sacred represents the collective beliefs and values of a society, fostering social solidarity and a sense of shared identity among members of a religious community. Rituals and ceremonies often revolve around the sacred, reinforcing its significance and the emotional bonds between believers.
Sampling is a fundamental research technique used in sociology and other disciplines that involves studying a carefully selected proportion of individuals or cases from a larger population in order to gather data and make inferences or generalisations about the characteristics of that entire population as a whole. The key principle of sampling is to select a subset that is representative of the larger group, meaning that it accurately reflects the diversity and key attributes of the population of interest. Various sampling methods exist, including probability sampling techniques like random sampling, stratified sampling, and cluster sampling, which aim to ensure that every member of the population has a known chance of being selected, as well as non-probability sampling techniques like convenience sampling and snowball sampling, which may be used when a representative sample is not feasible or the research goals are exploratory. The quality of a sample is crucial for the validity and generalizability of research findings.
The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, also known as the linguistic relativity hypothesis, is a theory concerning the intricate role of language in shaping cultures and influencing our modes of thought and perception of reality. It posits that the structure of a language affects its speakers' worldview or cognition, suggesting that the way people perceive and understand the world is, to some extent, determined by the language they speak. The strong version of the hypothesis argues that language completely determines thought, limiting the ways in which speakers can think about the world, while the weaker version suggests that language influences thought and habitual patterns of perception and cognition without being entirely deterministic. This hypothesis has been influential in linguistic anthropology and sociology, highlighting the close relationship between language, culture, and thought, although the extent of linguistic determinism remains a subject of ongoing debate.
Science is a systematic and logical system of acquiring knowledge about the natural and social world that bases its understanding on direct, systematic observation, empirical evidence, experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses and theories. It is characterised by its commitment to objectivity, empirical verification, and a self-correcting process where new evidence can lead to the revision or rejection of existing knowledge. The scientific method provides a structured approach to conducting research, ensuring rigor and minimizing bias in the pursuit of understanding how the world works. In sociology, science aims to apply these principles to the study of social behaviour, social structures, and social phenomena to develop reliable and valid knowledge about the social world.
The scientific method is a systematic, organised, and rigorous series of steps that ensures maximum objectivity and consistency in researching a problem or phenomenon, aiming to develop reliable and valid knowledge. It typically involves several key stages, including identifying a research question or problem, conducting a literature review, formulating a testable hypothesis, designing a research study to test the hypothesis, collecting data through observation, experimentation, or other methods, analysing the data, drawing conclusions based on the evidence, and reporting the findings. The scientific method emphasises empirical evidence, logical reasoning, transparency, and the possibility of replication to ensure the credibility and trustworthiness of research outcomes.
Secondary analysis encompasses a variety of research techniques that involve the use of publicly accessible information and data that were originally collected by other researchers or for different purposes, such as government statistics, census data, survey data archives, historical documents, and media content. Researchers conducting secondary analysis analyse these existing datasets to address new research questions, explore different aspects of a topic, or replicate previous studies using different samples or methods. This approach can be cost-effective and time-saving, as the data collection has already been completed, and it allows researchers to study large-scale trends or historical patterns that might be difficult or impossible to investigate through primary data collection. However, researchers must carefully consider the limitations of using secondary data, such as the original purpose of the data collection, the methods used, and the potential for missing or incomplete information.
A secondary group is a formal, impersonal, and often temporary group in which there is typically little social intimacy, emotional closeness, or mutual understanding among members, with interactions often being task-oriented and focused on achieving specific goals or objectives. Examples of secondary groups include a workplace project team, a classroom of students, members of a large organisation, or people waiting in line at a store. Relationships in secondary groups are often based on specific roles and statuses rather than personal connections, and the group may dissolve once its purpose is fulfilled. While secondary groups are essential for the functioning of modern complex societies, they generally do not provide the same level of emotional support or personal fulfillment as primary groups.
The secondary labour market refers to jobs that typically provide minimal benefits to workers, such as low wages, limited job security, few opportunities for advancement, and often poor working conditions. These jobs are often found in the service sector, in temporary or part-time positions, and may require lower levels of skill or education. Workers in the secondary labor market often experience precarious employment, with little control over their work and limited prospects for upward mobility. This segment of the labor market is often contrasted with the primary labor market, which consists of jobs that offer better pay, benefits, stability, and career advancement opportunities. The existence of a dual labor market can contribute to social and economic inequalities within a society.
The secondary sector of the economy is the part that is primarily involved in transforming raw materials, which are typically extracted or produced by the primary sector (such as agriculture, mining, and forestry), into finished or manufactured goods. This sector encompasses a wide range of industries, including manufacturing, construction, and energy production, where raw materials are processed, assembled, and converted into products that are ready for consumption or use by other industries. Examples of activities within the secondary sector include automobile manufacturing, textile production, food processing, building construction, and the generation of electricity. The growth and development of the secondary sector were central to the Industrial Revolution and the rise of industrialised economies, playing a key role in creating jobs, driving economic growth, and producing the goods that underpin modern society.
Secondary Socialisation is the process of learning and internalizing the norms, values, behaviours, and roles that are specific to particular social groups, institutions, or contexts outside of the primary family environment. This stage of socialisation typically occurs during adolescence and adulthood, building upon the foundational learning acquired during primary socialisation. Key agents of secondary socialisation include schools (where individuals learn academic knowledge, punctuality, and conformity to formal rules), peer groups (influencing social behaviours, identity formation, and cultural trends), religious institutions (imparting moral beliefs and practices), and the workplace (socializing individuals into professional roles, organisational culture, and specific job responsibilities). Unlike the intimate and emotionally charged nature of primary socialisation, secondary socialisation often involves more impersonal and instrumental relationships, as individuals learn how to navigate diverse social settings and adopt appropriate behaviours for new roles and statuses in a complex society. It is a continuous process of adaptation and learning throughout the life course.
A sect is a relatively small religious group that has typically broken away from a larger, more established religious organisation, such as a church or denomination, in an effort to renew what its members perceive as the original vision, doctrines, or practices of the faith, which they believe have become corrupted or diluted in the parent organisation. Sects often emphasise a more strict adherence to religious principles, may have a more exclusive membership, and can be characterised by a greater level of religious fervor and commitment among their followers compared to established churches. They may see themselves as a more authentic or purer form of the religion from which they originated and may have a more critical stance towards the wider society. In sociological terms, sects are often seen as being in a state of tension with the broader society and may evolve over time, potentially becoming more established and eventually forming new denominations.
Secularisation is a complex and multifaceted process of decline in the social and cultural influence of religion in modern societies. While many contemporary societies have become increasingly secular, the extent and nature of secularisation are subjects of ongoing sociological debate and research. Secularisation can be observed and measured in various ways, including a decrease in levels of individual involvement with religious organisations (such as lower rates of church attendance and religious affiliation), a reduction in the social and material influence wielded by religious institutions in areas like politics, education, and social welfare, and a decline in the degree to which people hold traditional religious beliefs and adhere to religious practices in their personal lives. Secularisation does not necessarily mean the complete disappearance of religion, but rather a shift in its role and significance in society and individual lives, often leading to a greater separation between religious and secular spheres of life.
Segregation refers to the act and process of physically, socially, or legally separating two or more groups of people, often based on characteristics such as race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or socioeconomic status. While segregation can occur in various forms, it is frequently imposed on a minority group by a dominant group within a society, leading to unequal access to resources, opportunities, and social institutions such as housing, education, healthcare, and employment. Segregation can be enforced through explicit laws and policies (de jure segregation) or through informal social norms and practices (de facto segregation). It often results in social isolation, limited intergroup contact, and the perpetuation of inequalities between the separated groups. The history of segregation in various parts of the world, such as racial segregation in the United States and apartheid in South Africa, demonstrates its profound and lasting negative impacts on marginalised groups and society as a whole.
According to the social psychology of George Herbert Mead, the self is not an innate quality but rather emerges and develops through social interaction and communication with others. Mead defined the self as the sum total of an individual's conscious perceptions, feelings, and evaluations of their own identity as distinct from others in the social world. This sense of self develops through a process of social interaction that involves taking the role of the other, initially through play and games, and eventually by internalizing the attitudes and expectations of the broader society, which Mead referred to as the "generalised other." The self is thus a social construct, constantly being shaped and reshaped through ongoing interactions and the internal dialogue between the "I" (the spontaneous, acting self) and the "me" (the self as object, reflecting on how others perceive us).
Self-employment refers to the situation where an individual earns a living directly from their own business, trade, or profession, without being employed by a large organisation or working for a regular salary or wages from an employer. Self-employed individuals are their own bosses and are responsible for all aspects of their work, including planning, organizing, managing finances, and providing the goods or services they offer. This can include a wide range of occupations, from freelancers and independent contractors to small business owners and entrepreneurs. Self-employment offers autonomy and the potential for greater control over one's work life and income, but it also typically involves more risk and responsibility compared to traditional employment.
A self-fulfilling prophecy is a social psychological phenomenon where the tendency of people to respond to and act on the basis of stereotypes, expectations, or predictions about themselves or others ultimately leads to the validation or confirmation of those initially false definitions or beliefs. In other words, a belief or expectation, whether accurate or not, can influence behaviour in such a way that it makes the originally false belief come true. For example, if a teacher believes that certain students are less capable, they may treat those students in a way that inadvertently hinders their learning and confirms the initial low expectations. Similarly, if a person is labeled as deviant, they may begin to act in ways that are consistent with that label due to the way others treat them and their own internalisation of the label.
Self-identity refers to the ongoing and dynamic process of self-development, self-definition, and the formulation of our personal identity through which we develop a unique sense of who we are as individuals and our relationship to the world and the people around us. It encompasses our sense of self-awareness, our understanding of our own characteristics, values, beliefs, and how we see ourselves in relation to various social categories and groups to which we belong or do not belong. Self-identity is not fixed but is continuously shaped and negotiated through social interactions, personal experiences, and the internalisation of societal norms and expectations throughout the life course. It involves both how we perceive ourselves and how we believe others perceive us, contributing to our sense of individuality and belonging within the social world.
Semi-peripheral countries, in the context of world-systems theory, occupy an intermediate position in the global economic hierarchy, supplying sources of labor and raw materials to the core industrial countries and the world economy, but not being themselves fully industrialised or dominant in the global market. These countries often have a mix of economic characteristics, with some level of industrialisation and diversification, but they may still be dependent on core countries for capital, technology, and high-value goods. Semi-peripheral countries can experience some degree of economic development and may have the potential to move up to the core or down to the periphery depending on various factors. Examples of semi-peripheral countries might include some nations in Eastern Europe, Latin America, and parts of Asia that are in a transitional stage of economic development.
Semiotics is the systematic study of symbols and signs and how they are used to create meaning in communication and culture. It explores how signs, which can be words, images, sounds, gestures, or objects, represent something other than themselves and how these representations are interpreted by individuals and within social contexts. Semiotics examines the relationship between signs, the objects or concepts they refer to (referents), and the individuals or groups who interpret them (interpreters). It is a multidisciplinary field that draws from linguistics, philosophy, sociology, and anthropology to understand the complex processes of meaning-making in human communication and cultural systems.
Serial monogamy is a form of marriage or intimate relationship pattern in which a person has several spouses or partners throughout their lifetime, but only one spouse or partner at any given time. This involves a sequence of monogamous relationships, where one relationship ends (typically through divorce or death of a partner) before another one begins. Serial monogamy has become an increasingly common pattern in many modern societies, reflecting changing social norms around marriage and relationships, as well as higher rates of divorce and remarriage.
Sex refers to the biological distinction between females and males, primarily based on differences in their reproductive organs, chromosomes, hormones, and other physical characteristics that are typically assigned at birth. It is generally considered a binary classification in many societies, although biological variations and intersex conditions exist that do not fit neatly into this binary. Sex is often conflated with gender, which is a social construct referring to the roles, behaviours, identities, and expectations that a society ascribes to individuals based on their perceived sex. While sex is rooted in biology, gender is culturally defined and can vary widely across different societies and time periods.
The sex ratio is a demographic indicator that represents the number of males for every hundred females in a given population, providing a measure of the relative balance between the sexes. It is calculated by dividing the total number of males by the total number of females and then multiplying the result by 100. The sex ratio can vary across different age groups, regions, and populations due to factors such as birth rates, mortality rates, migration patterns, and cultural preferences that may influence the sex of offspring or differential survival rates between males and females. The sex ratio at birth is typically around 105 males per 100 females in most human populations. Significant imbalances in the sex ratio can have social and economic consequences, potentially affecting marriage patterns, labor markets, and social stability.
Sexual_And_Gender_Disposition_Orientation encompasses the inherent patterns of emotional, romantic, and sexual attraction that constitute fundamental aspects of individual identity and social relationships. This class includes the general framework for understanding these attraction patterns (Sexual_Orientation) and the specific manifestations of attraction toward the same gender (Homosexuality, Lesbianism) or toward multiple genders (Bisexual). These dispositions represent deep-seated tendencies that shape personal identity, relationship formation, and social group membership. They are understood as natural variations in human sexuality rather than choices or preferences, constituting core aspects of who individuals are rather than what they do. The recognition and acceptance of these diverse orientations reflects evolving social understanding of human sexuality and the importance of acknowledging the full spectrum of human romantic and sexual disposition patterns.
Sexual harassment is a form of discrimination that involves unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favours, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature that explicitly or implicitly affects an individual's employment, unreasonably interferes with an individual's work performance, or creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment. It can occur in two main forms: quid pro quo harassment, where work benefits or conditions of employment are made contingent on sexual favours, and hostile environment harassment, where unwelcome sexual conduct, such as offensive touching, lewd comments, or the display of pornographic material, is severe or pervasive enough to create a hostile or abusive workplace. Sexual harassment is illegal in many countries and is recognised as a serious form of misconduct that can have significant negative impacts on the victim's psychological and professional well-being.
Sexual orientation refers to an enduring pattern of emotional, romantic, and/or sexual attractions to men, women, or both sexes, or neither sex. It also encompasses an individual's sense of identity based on those attractions, related behaviours, and membership in a community of others who share those attractions. Common sexual orientations include heterosexuality (attraction to the opposite sex), homosexuality (attraction to the same sex), bisexuality (attraction to both sexes), and asexuality (lack of sexual attraction to others). Sexual orientation is generally understood to be a fundamental aspect of personal identity and is distinct from gender identity and gender expression.
Sexuality is a broad and encompassing term that refers to the sexual characteristics, behaviours, attractions, desires, fantasies, and identities of human beings, as well as the social, cultural, and political aspects related to sex and intimacy. It includes biological sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, sexual practices, and the emotional and social dimensions of sexual relationships. Sexuality is shaped by a complex interplay of biological, psychological, social, cultural, and historical factors and is a fundamental aspect of human experience and identity. The study of sexuality in sociology examines its diverse expressions, its role in social life, and the ways in which it is regulated and understood across different societies and time periods.
The sick role is a concept in medical sociology, developed by Talcott Parsons, that describes the societal expectations and norms surrounding the attitudes and behaviour of a person who is viewed as being ill. According to this concept, when individuals are sick, they are generally expected to adopt certain behaviours, such as seeking medical attention, trying to get well, and cooperating with healthcare professionals. In return, they are often granted certain exemptions from normal social responsibilities, such as work or school, and are not held responsible for their condition. However, these exemptions are typically conditional on the individual actively trying to recover and return to their normal social roles. The sick role highlights the social aspects of illness and how society shapes our understanding and responses to being sick.
Single-parent families are households in which there is only one parent present to care for and raise children, without the presence of the other biological or adoptive parent in the same residence. This family structure can arise due to various circumstances, including divorce, separation, death of a parent, or the choice of an individual to parent alone. Single-parent families can face unique challenges, often related to financial strain, time constraints, and the emotional demands of raising children without a co-parent in the home. Sociological studies of single-parent families examine their prevalence, the social and economic factors that contribute to their formation, and their impact on the well-being and development of both parents and children, often highlighting the resilience and diverse experiences within these family structures.
A small group in sociology is typically defined as a group of individuals that is small enough in size for all members to interact simultaneously with one another, meaning they can engage in direct face-to-face communication, such as talking with one another or at least being personally acquainted. The size of a small group can vary, but it is usually considered to be a number where direct interaction and mutual awareness are feasible, often ranging from a dyad (two people) to a group of around 15-20 members. Small groups are characterised by closer relationships, more intimate interactions, and a greater sense of personal connection and mutual influence among members compared to larger, more formal groups. They play a crucial role in social life, providing a context for primary relationships, socialisation, and the development of social norms and identities.
Snowball sampling is a non-probability sampling method used by researchers to gather a sample for research studies, particularly when the population of interest is difficult to reach or identify, such as in studies of marginalised groups or hidden populations. In this method, researchers begin by identifying a small number of individuals who meet the study criteria and who are willing to participate. These initial participants are then asked to recruit acquaintances, friends, or other individuals from their own social networks who also fit the study's criteria, and this process continues, with each new participant potentially leading to more participants, much like a snowball rolling down a hill and gathering more snow. While snowball sampling can be effective in reaching hard-to-find populations, it may not result in a sample that is representative of the entire population, as participants are recruited through existing social networks, which may introduce certain biases.
Social_And_Cultural_Identity_Quality encompasses attributes related to cultural background, social group membership, and identity formation that shape individual and collective social experience. These qualities include aspects of gender identity, sexual orientation, personality characteristics, and cultural diversity that influence how individuals understand themselves and relate to others. They represent both personal identity attributes and broader social characteristics that contribute to cultural richness and social complexity. These qualities are often central to discussions of diversity, inclusion, and social justice, as they can be the basis for both social solidarity and discrimination. Understanding these qualities is crucial for analysing identity politics, cultural dynamics, and the construction of social difference.
Social_And_Political_Consciousness_Quality represents characteristics related to awareness of social position, political understanding, and collective consciousness that influence social and political action. These qualities include various forms of social and political awareness that can lead to collective action, social change, and political mobilisation. They encompass both accurate and distorted forms of social consciousness and highlight the role of ideas and awareness in shaping social and political behaviour. These qualities are crucial for understanding how social movements emerge, how political change occurs, and how social actors develop understanding of their interests and possibilities for action.
Social change refers to significant alterations over time in the behaviour patterns, social structures, cultural norms, values, and beliefs of a society or a significant part of it. This can occur at various levels, from micro-level changes in individual behaviours and interactions to macro-level transformations in institutions and global systems. Social change can be driven by a multitude of factors, including technological innovations, economic shifts, demographic changes, social movements, cultural diffusion, and political events. It is a continuous and dynamic process that shapes the evolution of societies and can have both positive and negative consequences for different groups within a society.
Social Class is a fundamental concept within social stratification, referring to a large group of people who share a similar economic position in society, primarily based on their relationship to the means of production, income, wealth, and occupation. While specific definitions vary, major sociological class distinctions often include the upper class (those with inherited wealth or control of large businesses), the middle class (professionals, managers, small business owners), the working class (manual or blue-collar laborers), and the underclass (those experiencing chronic poverty and marginalisation). Social class influences an individual's life chances, affecting their access to education, healthcare, housing, and opportunities for social mobility. Marxist theory emphasises class consciousness and the inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) and the proletariat (working class) over the means of production. Understanding social class is crucial for analysing structured inequalities, economic exploitation, and the distribution of power and resources within a society.
Social Cohesion refers to the degree of solidarity, unity, and sense of belonging that exists among individuals and groups within a society, reflecting the bonds that tie people together and enable them to live and work together effectively. It is characterised by shared values, common norms, mutual trust, and a willingness to cooperate for the collective good. Émile Durkheim identified two types of social cohesion: mechanical solidarity, found in traditional societies based on homogeneity and shared morality, and organic solidarity, prevalent in modern, complex societies based on interdependence and specialisation. High levels of social cohesion contribute to social stability, order, and collective well-being, fostering a sense of community and mutual support. Conversely, a lack of social cohesion can lead to social disorganisation, conflict, and a sense of anomie or normlessness among individuals.
Social_Cohesion_And_Integration_Quality represents characteristics that describe the bonds, solidarity, and unity that hold societies and social groups together. These qualities include different forms of social solidarity, collective consciousness, and the mechanisms through which societies maintain integration and stability. They encompass both traditional forms of solidarity based on similarity and modern forms based on interdependence and specialisation. These qualities are central to understanding how societies maintain social order, manage conflict, and create shared identity and purpose among their members. They highlight the importance of social bonds and collective commitment for the functioning and stability of social systems.
Social_Conflict_And_Inequality_Theory represent perspectives that emphasise tensions, power struggles, and systematic inequalities as fundamental features of social organisation. These theories reject harmonious views of society, instead highlighting how competing groups struggle over scarce resources, power, and status. Marxist and exploitation theories focus specifically on class-based conflicts within capitalist systems, examining how economic structures create and perpetuate inequality. Conflict perspectives extend beyond class to include racial, ethnic, gender, and other forms of social stratification. Contact hypothesis addresses intergroup relations and prejudice reduction, while new urban sociology examines how global forces create spatial inequalities in cities. These theories share the assumption that social change occurs through struggle and conflict rather than gradual adaptation, viewing inequality and competition as driving forces in social development. They emphasise how dominant groups maintain power and how subordinated groups challenge existing hierarchies.
Social_Consciousness_And_Theoretical_Quality encompasses characteristics related to social awareness, theoretical understanding, and the various forms of consciousness that shape social life and social change. These qualities include both individual and collective forms of social awareness, theoretical concepts that explain social phenomena, and the various ways that social actors understand and interpret their social world. They represent the cognitive and interpretive dimensions of social life that influence how people understand their social position, relationships, and possibilities for action. These qualities are central to understanding social change, political mobilisation, and the role of ideas and consciousness in shaping social reality.
The social constructionist perspective is a sociological approach to understanding various social phenomena, including deviance, that emphasises the role of culture, social interaction, and shared meanings in the creation and definition of social reality. In the context of deviance, this perspective argues that what is considered deviant is not inherent in a particular behaviour itself but rather is socially defined and labeled as such by particular groups or societies based on cultural norms, values, and power dynamics. The social construction of deviance involves processes through which certain behaviours come to be defined as unacceptable or abnormal, and individuals who engage in these behaviours are labeled as deviant, often with significant social consequences for their identity and life chances. This perspective highlights the relativity of deviance across different cultures and time periods.
Social control refers to the diverse techniques, mechanisms, and strategies that are used by individuals, groups, institutions, and societies to prevent or regulate deviant human behaviour and to ensure conformity to established norms, rules, and laws. Social control can be informal, operating through everyday social interactions and the use of social sanctions such as disapproval, ridicule, or ostracism within families, peer groups, and communities. It can also be formal, involving the use of laws, regulations, and the authority of institutions like the police, courts, and correctional systems to enforce norms and punish deviance. The goal of social control is to maintain social order, stability, and cohesion within a society.
This sub-category encompasses abstract concepts, strategies, and organisational forms related to how societies regulate behaviour, maintain order, and respond to deviance, as well as how collective efforts are organised to achieve social goals or bring about change. It includes both formal and informal mechanisms of social control, and the frameworks of social movements and collective behaviour.
Social_Control_And_Regulatory_Mechanism encompasses the systematic processes, institutions, and practices through which societies maintain order, enforce norms, and regulate behaviour to ensure conformity with established rules and expectations. This category represents the coercive and normative apparatus that societies develop to prevent deviance, punish violations, and maintain social stability. These mechanisms operate as realizable entities that can be activated when norm violations occur, representing the potential for societies to respond to threats to social order through both formal institutional responses and informal social sanctions. The category includes both the legal framework that provides formal rules and procedures for addressing deviance, as well as broader social control processes that operate through everyday interactions and community responses. These mechanisms demonstrate how societies balance individual autonomy with collective order, establishing boundaries of acceptable behaviour and consequences for transgression. The regulatory dimension captures how these control mechanisms not only punish deviance but also serve preventive functions by establishing clear expectations and demonstrating the consequences of norm violation to the broader community.
Social_Control_And_Response_Process encompasses systematic societal mechanisms for maintaining order, addressing norm violations, and managing social conflicts through various forms of intervention, punishment, and exclusion. These processes represent how societies respond to deviance and attempt to maintain social cohesion through both formal and informal control mechanisms. Capital punishment represents the most extreme form of state-sanctioned social control. Rehabilitation focuses on transformative interventions aimed at reintegrating offenders into society. Discrimination and segregation involve systematic exclusion and differential treatment based on group characteristics. Sexual harassment represents processes of gender-based social control and victimisation. Hate crimes involve targeted violence based on group identity. Social exclusion encompasses broader patterns of marginalisation and systematic denial of participation in social life. Strikes represent organised collective action challenging economic power structures. Victimisation processes highlight the experiences and impacts of being targeted by various forms of harm. These processes demonstrate the complex interplay between social control, resistance, and the ongoing negotiation of power relations within society.
Social_Deviance_And_Norm_Violation_Process represents behaviours and activities that challenge, violate, or exist outside established social norms, moral codes, and cultural expectations, regardless of their legal status. These processes demonstrate how societies define boundaries between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour and how individuals and groups navigate these boundaries. Deviance serves as the overarching concept for understanding norm violation and social boundary maintenance. Victimless crimes represent activities where willing participants engage in legally prohibited behaviours without clear harm to others. The underground economy encompasses economic activities that operate outside formal regulatory frameworks. Collective behaviour involves spontaneous group actions that deviate from routine social patterns and institutional procedures. These processes highlight the socially constructed nature of normalcy and deviance, showing how cultural context, power relations, and social change influence what behaviours are considered acceptable or problematic within different social groups and historical periods.
Social epidemiology is a subfield within epidemiology and sociology that focuses on the study of the social determinants of health, examining the distribution of disease, impairment, and general health status across a population and identifying the social factors, such as socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, gender, social networks, and neighborhood conditions, that influence health outcomes and contribute to health inequalities within and between populations. Social epidemiologists investigate how these social factors affect the risk, incidence, prevalence, and progression of diseases, as well as overall well-being, aiming to understand the underlying social mechanisms that shape health and to inform public health policies and interventions that can reduce health disparities and promote health equity.
Social evolution is a theoretical perspective that was initially popular among nineteenth-century sociological scholars who sought to apply the principles of evolutionary theory from biology to the study of the long-term development and progression of human societies over time. These early social evolutionists often posited that societies develop through a series of fixed stages, moving from simpler, more primitive forms to more complex, advanced, and civilised states, drawing analogies to the biological evolution of species. While this unilinear view of social evolution, suggesting a single path of development for all societies, has largely been discredited in contemporary sociology due to its ethnocentric biases and lack of empirical support, the broader concept of social evolution still informs the study of long-term social change and the ways in which societies adapt and transform over extended periods in response to various factors such as technological innovation, environmental pressures, and intergroup interactions. Modern sociological approaches to social change recognise the multilinear nature of societal development, acknowledging that different societies can follow diverse paths and experience change in various ways, not necessarily leading to a single predetermined endpoint.
Social exclusion is a complex and multidimensional process and outcome where individuals or groups are prevented from fully participating in the economic, social, political, and cultural life of the society in which they are located due to a combination of multiple and often intersecting deprivations. These deprivations can include lack of adequate income and resources, limited access to employment, education, healthcare, housing, and social support networks, as well as experiences of discrimination, marginalisation, and a lack of voice or power in decision-making processes that affect their lives. Social exclusion can lead to feelings of isolation, alienation, and a diminished sense of belonging, hindering individuals' ability to exercise their rights, fulfill their potential, and participate as full and valued members of society. Addressing social exclusion requires tackling the various interconnected factors that contribute to it through inclusive policies and practices that promote equal opportunities and social integration for all members of society.
Social_Experience_And_Condition_Quality encompasses characteristics that describe the subjective experiences and social conditions that shape individual and collective social life. These qualities include various forms of social alienation, anomie, and other conditions that affect social well-being and integration. They represent both positive and negative aspects of social experience and highlight the psychological and social dimensions of life in modern society. These qualities are important for understanding the human costs and benefits of different forms of social organisation and the various challenges that individuals face in navigating complex social environments.
Social facts, according to the foundational sociologist Émile Durkheim, are the aspects of social life—such as norms, values, beliefs, institutions, and social structures—that exist external to individuals and yet shape our actions, thoughts, and feelings as individuals, exerting a coercive influence over us. Durkheim argued that these social facts have an objective reality and are not simply the product of individual psychology or biology, and therefore, they could and should be studied scientifically, using empirical observation and analysis to uncover the patterns and laws that govern social life. Examples of social facts include the institution of marriage, the education system, religious beliefs, and legal codes, which exist independently of any single individual but influence how people behave and organise their lives within a society. Durkheim emphasised the importance of studying social facts to understand the nature of society and the forces that maintain social order and cohesion.
Social function refers to the consequences or effects of any social pattern, institution, behaviour, or social activity for the overall operation, stability, and maintenance of a society or a social system. In functionalist sociology, the focus is on understanding how different parts of society contribute to the whole and help to meet the needs of the social system. Social functions can be manifest, meaning they are the recognised and intended consequences of a social pattern, or latent, meaning they are the unintended and often unrecognised consequences. For example, the manifest function of education is to transmit knowledge and skills, while a latent function might be the development of social networks among students. Analysing the social functions of various aspects of society helps sociologists understand how societies are structured and how they maintain themselves over time.
A social group is defined as a collection of two or more individuals who interact with one another in systematic and patterned ways on a regular or recurring basis, share common norms, values, and expectations, and develop a sense of collective identity or belonging. Groups can vary in size, from small, intimate primary groups like families and close friends, to larger, more formal secondary groups like workplaces or voluntary organisations, and even larger social categories like ethnic groups or social classes. The interaction within social groups is characterised by shared understandings, reciprocal influence, and a sense of "we-ness" that distinguishes members from non-members. Social groups are fundamental to social life, providing individuals with social support, a sense of identity, and a context for learning and enacting social roles and behaviours.
Social_Groups_And_Collective encompasses the fundamental building blocks of social organisation that emerge from regular patterns of human interaction, shared identity, and mutual recognition among members. These object aggregates represent various scales and types of social association, from intimate personal relationships to large-scale social categories, each characterised by distinct patterns of interaction, solidarity, and group consciousness. They include both primary groups that provide emotional support and identity formation, and secondary groups that serve more instrumental purposes. The diversity within this domain reflects the multiple ways humans organise themselves socially, create boundaries between "us" and "them," and develop collective identities that transcend individual characteristics. These aggregates are essential for understanding how social structure emerges from individual action and how social identity and belonging are constructed and maintained.
Social_Identity_And_Category_Group encompasses collective entities defined by shared characteristics, social positions, or cultural attributes that create group consciousness and social identity among members. These aggregates are often based on ascribed characteristics or shared experiences that become socially significant through processes of social construction and group formation. Members may not interact directly but share common experiences, challenges, or social positions that create a sense of group belonging and shared fate. These groups play crucial roles in social stratification, identity formation, and political mobilisation, often serving as the basis for social movements and political action. The boundaries and significance of these groups are socially constructed and can change over time, reflecting broader social and political dynamics within society.
Social_Identity_And_Personal_Quality encompasses the fundamental characteristics and attributes that define individual and collective identity within social contexts. These qualities represent both ascribed characteristics determined by birth or social assignment and achieved attributes developed through social interaction and personal development. They include demographic characteristics, psychological attributes, and social positions that shape how individuals and groups are perceived and how they perceive themselves within society. These qualities form the foundation for social categorisation, group membership, and the construction of social identity, influencing patterns of interaction, opportunity, and social organisation. Understanding these qualities is essential for analysing social stratification, identity formation, and the dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in social systems.
Social inequality refers to a condition within a society in which its members have significantly different amounts of wealth, income, prestige, power, or other valued resources and opportunities. This unequal distribution can be based on various social categories such as social class, race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, and disability, often resulting in hierarchical arrangements where some groups have more access to resources and privileges than others. Social inequality is a fundamental topic of study in sociology, with researchers examining its causes, consequences, and the ways in which it is maintained and challenged over time. It can manifest in various forms, including economic disparities, differences in social status and respect, and unequal access to political influence and decision-making power.
Social_Inequality_And_Stratification_Quality encompasses the characteristics and attributes that reflect and constitute systems of social hierarchy, privilege, and disadvantage within society. These qualities represent both the manifestations of inequality and the mechanisms through which social stratification is maintained and reproduced. They include economic conditions, social status markers, and experiences of discrimination and disadvantage that create and sustain hierarchical social arrangements. These qualities are central to understanding how societies organise themselves into different social strata and how individuals and groups experience differential access to resources, opportunities, and social rewards. They highlight the multidimensional nature of social inequality and the various ways in which advantage and disadvantage are distributed across social categories.
Social Institutions represent complex, enduring, and organised sets of norms, values, statuses, roles, and groups that are established and accepted as fundamental components of a society's structure, primarily organised to meet basic human needs and perform essential societal functions. These major spheres of social life, such as the family, education, religion, government, and the economy, provide a framework for social interaction, guide individual and group behaviour, and contribute to the overall stability and continuity of society. Each institution has its own specific purposes, functions, and established ways of operating, and they are interconnected, influencing and being influenced by one another. Sociologists study social institutions to understand how they are structured, how they function, and how they evolve over time, as well as their impact on individuals and the perpetuation of social inequalities within a society.
Social interaction is the fundamental process by which people act and react in relation to others, involving communication, mutual influence, and the creation of shared meanings and social bonds. It occurs at all levels of social life, from brief encounters between strangers to long-term relationships within families and close-knit groups, and in formal settings like workplaces and organisations as well as informal settings like social gatherings. Social interaction can take various forms, including verbal communication, nonverbal cues such as gestures and facial expressions, and the exchange of symbols and meanings. It is through social interaction that individuals develop their sense of self, learn social norms, establish relationships, and collectively construct social reality. The study of social interaction is a core focus of microsociology, aiming to understand the patterns and dynamics of everyday social life.
Social mobility refers to the movement of individuals or groups from one position to another within a society's stratification system, which is the hierarchical arrangement of social positions based on factors like wealth, income, occupation, education, and social status. This movement can be upward, representing an improvement in social standing (e.g., moving from a working-class job to a professional occupation), or downward, indicating a decline in social position (e.g., due to unemployment or business failure). Social mobility can occur within an individual's lifetime (intragenerational mobility) or across generations (intergenerational mobility, comparing the social position of children to that of their parents). The degree of social mobility in a society is often seen as an indicator of its openness and the extent to which individuals can change their social standing based on their achievements and efforts rather than being limited by their ascribed status at birth.
A social movement encompasses collective attempts by a group of people to further a common interest or secure a shared goal through organised action that typically takes place outside the sphere of established political institutions and conventional channels. These movements often arise in response to perceived social, economic, or political grievances and seek to bring about or resist social change, existing in a dynamic relationship, often one of conflict, with organisations or power structures whose objectives and outlook they frequently oppose. Social movements can vary widely in their goals, tactics, organisational structures, and the scale of change they aim to achieve, ranging from advocating for specific policy reforms to seeking fundamental transformations in societal norms and values. While they operate outside of formal political systems, successful social movements can sometimes influence policy and, if they manage to gain significant power and become institutionalised, may evolve into formal organisations or even political parties.
Social Movements and Collective Behaviour constitutes a dynamic and significant sociological domain that studies organised and unorganised collective actions by groups of people. Collective behaviour typically refers to spontaneous, unstructured activities (like crowds, riots, fads, or panics) that emerge in response to common stimuli, often outside established social norms. Social movements, on the other hand, are more organised, sustained, and goal-oriented collective efforts to bring about or resist social change, often operating outside conventional political institutions. This field examines the emergence, mobilisation (e.g., resource mobilisation theory), strategies, tactics, and impacts of various collective actions, from grassroots activism and protests (e.g., Black Power, Luddite) to broad social and cultural shifts. It analyses how individuals come together to express shared grievances, form collective identities, challenge existing power structures, and ultimately influence the direction of social change.
A social network refers to a series of interconnected social relationships that links an individual directly to other people and, through them, indirectly to an even wider circle of individuals, forming a complex web of social connections. These networks can be based on various types of relationships, including friendship, kinship, work affiliations, shared interests, or online interactions, and they facilitate the flow of information, resources, social support, and influence among the individuals within them. The structure and characteristics of an individual's social network, such as its size, density, and the strength of its ties, can have significant implications for their opportunities, well-being, and social capital, which is the collective benefit derived from social connections and relationships.
Social_Object_Aggregate encompasses organised collections of individuals, institutions, and social formations that constitute the fundamental building blocks of social structure and organisation. This category includes diverse forms of collective entities ranging from small-scale interpersonal groupings to large-scale societal formations and institutional arrangements. It covers primary social units such as families, peer groups, and dyads, as well as complex organisational structures including bureaucracies, corporations, and formal organisations. The category extends to broader societal classifications encompassing social classes, ethnic groups, and various forms of social stratification. It also includes economic formations such as different types of societies (agrarian, industrial, postindustrial) and economic groupings (bourgeoisie, proletariat, working class). Geographic and developmental classifications are represented through concepts like core countries, peripheral countries, and various world system designations. Religious and cultural formations are captured through churches, denominations, sects, and ethnic groups. These aggregates represent the organised collective dimension of social life, forming the structural foundation through which individuals participate in society and through which social processes operate and social change occurs.
Social_Organisation_And_Collective_Quality encompasses characteristics and attributes that describe how societies organise themselves collectively and maintain social order and cohesion. These qualities represent both the mechanisms that hold societies together and the characteristics that describe different types of social organisation and collective life. They include measures of social solidarity, cultural integration, and the various ways societies structure themselves to manage diversity, maintain order, and coordinate collective action. These qualities are essential for understanding how societies function as integrated wholes and how they balance unity with diversity, order with change, and individual autonomy with collective needs.
Social_Organisational_Structures_And_Framework encompasses the analytical concepts, theoretical constructs, and empirical patterns that describe how societies organise themselves into stable, predictable arrangements of roles, relationships, and institutions. This category represents the foundational architecture of social life that provides the context within which political systems operate and through which social control is exercised. These structures function as realizable entities that manifest through repeated patterns of interaction, institutional arrangements, and the reproduction of social hierarchies and organisational forms. The category includes both the concrete organisational arrangements that coordinate social life and the conceptual frameworks that sociologists use to analyse and understand these patterns. These structures represent the relatively stable backdrop against which political processes unfold, providing the institutional context that shapes how power is exercised, how conflicts are managed, and how social change occurs. The organisational dimension captures how societies develop systematic ways of coordinating collective activities, managing resources, and maintaining continuity across time, while the conceptual dimension provides the analytical tools necessary for understanding these complex arrangements and their effects on individual and collective behaviour.
Social_Organisations_And_Institution encompasses structured collective entities that emerge from coordinated human activity to achieve specific purposes, maintain social order, and fulfill societal functions. These object aggregates represent formalised arrangements of individuals bound together by shared goals, authority structures, rules, and procedures that transcend individual participation. They include both voluntary associations formed for specific purposes and institutionalised entities that provide essential societal functions. The diversity within this domain reflects the complexity of modern social organisation, from small-scale voluntary groups to large-scale bureaucratic institutions. These aggregates demonstrate how individual human agency becomes channeled through collective structures to achieve outcomes that would be impossible through individual action alone, creating stable patterns of social organisation that persist across time and membership changes.
Social Organisations and Settings is a meta-category that encompasses the structured groups, formal associations, and diverse social environments or contexts where social interaction and collective activities take place. This domain includes various types of formal organisations (e.g., corporations, bureaucracies, total institutions like prisons and monasteries) which are deliberately designed for efficiency and specific goals, characterised by hierarchical authority and established rules. It also covers the general concept of "organisation" itself, alongside specific types like "classical theory" management approaches (e.g., scientific management). Furthermore, it includes distinct social settings (e.g., front region, back region in dramaturgical analysis) and the dynamics that emerge within them. This category provides a framework for understanding how groups are structured, how individuals interact within these structures, and how organisational principles influence social behaviour, efficiency, and power relations in various societal contexts, from workplaces to broader societal settings.
Social Processes is a broad, overarching category in sociology that refers to the dynamic, recurrent patterns of social interaction, relationships, and changes that shape and maintain society over time. These are the fundamental ways in which individuals and groups interact, influence each other, and collectively create, reproduce, or transform social structures and cultural patterns. Key social processes include socialisation (learning norms and values), social interaction (how people act and react to each other), social change (significant alterations in society), and social control (mechanisms for regulating behaviour). Other processes involve social mobility (movement within stratification), migration (population movements), and deviance (norm violation). This category provides a framework for understanding the dynamic nature of social life, emphasizing that society is not static but constantly in flux through ongoing interactions, adaptations, and transformations that occur at micro, meso, and macro levels.
This comprehensive category encompasses all dynamic, recurrent patterns of social activity, interaction, and transformation that unfold over time within human societies. It serves as a high-level grouping for phenomena that describe changes, developments, or occurrences at individual, group, or societal levels.
This sub-category groups abstract concepts and patterns related to how social reality is mediated, understood, and expressed, particularly concerning communication, social networks, and the forms of social categorisation. It highlights the symbolic, interactive, and classificatory elements that shape social experience and relationships within society.
Social_Research_And_Analytical_Quality encompasses characteristics and attributes related to the systematic study of social phenomena, including methodological concepts, analytical frameworks, and measures used to understand and analyse social life. These qualities represent both the tools and concepts that social scientists use to study society and the characteristics that emerge from social research and analysis. They include statistical measures, research quality indicators, and theoretical concepts that help explain social phenomena. These qualities are essential for understanding how social knowledge is produced, validated, and applied to understand complex social patterns and relationships. They reflect the scientific foundation of sociological inquiry and the various ways social phenomena can be measured and analysed.
Social_Role represents the organised system of behavioural expectations, positions, and identities that individuals occupy within social structures and through which social interaction is organised and regulated. This category encompasses the fundamental mechanisms through which societies organise human behaviour and social relationships, including both positions that individuals achieve through their actions and those that are ascribed based on characteristics beyond their control. The concept includes the hierarchical dimension of social positions through status systems and the specialised behavioural expectations associated with particular social positions. Gender roles represent culturally defined expectations based on sex categories, while the sick role exemplifies how societies organise responses to illness and health conditions. Master status refers to dominant identity categories that override other social positions in social interaction. The category captures how societies create and maintain social order through the assignment and performance of differentiated roles that coordinate individual behaviour with collective needs and expectations. These roles serve as bridges between individual identity and social structure, providing frameworks for social interaction, identity formation, and the reproduction of social patterns across time and social contexts.
Social science is a broad field of academic disciplines that focuses on the systematic study of various aspects of human society, social behaviour, social structures, and the relationships among individuals within society. It encompasses a wide range of specialised fields, including sociology, anthropology, political science, economics, psychology, and history, among others, each employing different theoretical perspectives and research methods to investigate the complexities of human social life. The goal of social science is to develop a deeper understanding of how societies function, how people interact, the causes and consequences of social phenomena, and to contribute to knowledge that can inform social policies and address social problems.
Social_Science_Disposition encompasses enduring tendencies, capacities, orientations, and potentialities that individuals, groups, and social entities possess which manifest in characteristic patterns of social behaviour, perception, and action under appropriate circumstances. As a BFO disposition, this category captures the inherent propensities and latent capabilities that become actualised through social interaction and environmental triggers. It includes fundamental forms of social authority that represent dispositions to exercise legitimate power through traditional, charismatic, or legal-rational means. Sexual orientations and related identity dispositions reflect deep-seated tendencies toward particular forms of attraction and relationship formation. Cognitive and perceptual dispositions such as ethnocentrism, rationality, and sociological imagination represent characteristic ways of understanding and interpreting social reality. Economic dispositions include monopolistic tendencies and vested interests that shape market behaviour and resource control. The category encompasses both individual-level dispositions like bilingualism, expressiveness, and instrumentality, as well as structural dispositions that emerge from social positioning, such as life chances and the effects of push and pull factors in migration. These dispositions represent the underlying capacities and tendencies that, when activated by appropriate social conditions, generate observable social phenomena and behavioural patterns, serving as crucial explanatory mechanisms in sociological analysis.
The social self, according to the theory of George Herbert Mead, is the basis of self-consciousness and personal identity in human individuals, which emerges and develops through social interaction and the internalisation of others' perspectives and attitudes towards oneself. Mead argued that the self is not an innate characteristic but is socially constructed through a process of taking the role of the other, initially significant others like family members, and eventually the generalised other, representing the broader societal norms and expectations. Through these interactions, individuals develop a sense of who they are as distinct from others by seeing themselves reflected in the reactions and evaluations of those around them, leading to self-awareness and the ability to think about oneself as an object.
Social_Social_Spatial_Region encompasses the various spatially defined areas and environments that are socially constructed, organised, and experienced as meaningful contexts for human interaction and social life. This category includes both physical and virtual spaces that have been imbued with social significance and serve as contexts for different forms of social behaviour and interaction. It covers urban formations ranging from historical city types to contemporary metropolitan areas and suburban developments, reflecting the evolution of human settlement patterns and spatial organisation. The category includes specialised spatial concepts such as defended neighborhoods, which represent territorialised social spaces, and squatter settlements, which reflect informal urban development patterns. Virtual spaces are represented through cyberspace, acknowledging the increasing importance of digital environments in contemporary social life. The public sphere represents spaces dedicated to democratic discourse and civic engagement. Back regions refer to spaces where individuals can relax social performances and behave more informally. These spatial regions are not merely physical containers but are actively constructed through social processes, carrying cultural meanings, social rules, and behavioural expectations that shape how individuals and groups interact within them.
Social Solidarity refers to the bonds of unity, cohesion, and mutual support that hold members of a social group or society together, creating a sense of shared identity and collective belonging. Émile Durkheim, a foundational sociologist, distinguished two primary forms: Mechanical Solidarity, found in traditional, homogeneous societies, based on the likeness of individuals and a strong collective consciousness (shared values and beliefs). Organic Solidarity, characteristic of modern, complex societies, arises from the interdependence of individuals due to a highly specialised division of labor, where people rely on each other's specialised skills and contributions. Social solidarity is crucial for maintaining social order, stability, and cooperation, as it fosters trust, reciprocity, and a collective commitment to the group's well-being. A breakdown in social solidarity can lead to social disorganisation, anomie, and increased conflict within a society.
Social_Status_And_Recognition_Quality encompasses attributes related to social honor, respect, and recognition that create hierarchies of social standing and prestige within society. These qualities include measures of social esteem, occupational prestige, and cultural capital that influence how individuals and groups are valued and respected by others. They represent the non-economic dimensions of social stratification that can operate independently of material wealth and reflect different sources of social value and recognition. These qualities highlight how societies create systems of social honor and how these systems interact with economic inequality to create complex patterns of social hierarchy and distinction.
Social stratification refers to the existence of structured inequalities between different groups in society in terms of their access to material or symbolic rewards, such as wealth, income, prestige, power, status, and opportunities. While some forms of social differentiation may exist in all societies, significant and enduring patterns of inequality, leading to hierarchical arrangements of social groups, tend to arise with the development of more complex, state-based systems. The most distinctive and extensively studied form of stratification in modern societies involves class divisions, based primarily on economic factors, but stratification can also occur along lines of race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, and other social categories. Sociologists examine the causes and consequences of social stratification, as well as the processes that maintain or challenge these inequalities over time.
Social_Stratification_And_Mobility_Process represents the dynamic movements of individuals and groups within hierarchical social systems that determine life chances, opportunities, and social outcomes across generations and within individual lifetimes. These processes encompass both the general mechanisms of social mobility and specific patterns of movement within stratification systems. They include movement across different social strata as well as lateral movement within the same social level. These processes are fundamental to understanding how societies maintain or transform their inequality structures and how individual effort, social circumstances, and structural opportunities interact to shape social trajectories. They reflect the tension between social reproduction and social change, highlighting how societies balance stability with opportunities for advancement. Understanding these processes is crucial for analysing meritocracy, equality of opportunity, and the persistence or transformation of social inequalities.
Social structure refers to the underlying patterns of social relationships, institutions, and social organisation that shape and constrain individuals' behaviour and interactions within a society, providing a framework for social life. It is the way in which a society is organised into predictable relationships and hierarchies based on factors such as social class, gender, race, ethnicity, age, and social institutions like the family, education, government, and the economy. Social structure is not always immediately visible but exerts a powerful influence on individuals' opportunities, experiences, and life chances. Sociologists study social structure to understand the enduring patterns of social behaviour and the ways in which society is organised at a macro level.
Social Structure Concepts is a meta-category that encompasses the abstract ideas, analytical frameworks, and theoretical constructs sociologists use to understand the stable, patterned, and enduring relationships, roles, institutions, and organisations that constitute the framework of a society. These concepts help to delineate how society is organised and how it influences human behaviour. Examples include the general idea of "social structure" itself, as well as specific components like social facts (Durkheim's external, coercive aspects of social life), social functions (consequences for societal operation), and various organisational principles (e.g., formal organisation, bureaucracy). It also covers dynamic processes like structuration (the mutual shaping of agency and structure) and negotiated order (social order arising from ongoing interactions). This category provides the essential vocabulary for analysing the underlying organisation of society, beyond individual actions, to understand how social forces shape collective life.
This sub-category encompasses the abstract concepts, organisational forms, and enduring patterns that frame and organise social life within societies. It includes formal and informal institutions, established social systems, and the underlying structural arrangements that regulate collective behaviour, power relations, and the distribution of resources, providing a stable framework for social interaction and societal functioning.
Social_Theory_And_Analysis_Framework encompasses the analytical tools, theoretical models, and conceptual frameworks that sociologists employ to understand, explain, and predict social phenomena at various scales of analysis. This class includes demographic theories that link population patterns to societal development (Demographic_Transition_Theory), global structural theories that examine international power relations (World-systems_Theory), gender theories that analyse masculinity constructions (Hegemonic_Masculinity), statistical concepts for measuring relationships between variables (Correlation), communication systems that enable cultural transmission (Language), and educational paradigms for continuous development (Lifelong_Learning). These frameworks provide the methodological and theoretical foundation for systematic social research, enabling scholars to move beyond description to explanation and prediction. They represent the accumulated wisdom of sociological inquiry and the diverse approaches needed to comprehend the complexity of human social organisation.
Socialisation refers to the lifelong social processes through which individuals develop an awareness of social norms, values, beliefs, and behaviours of their culture and society, and achieve a distinct sense of self and identity. This process begins in early childhood with primary socialisation within the family, where children learn basic language, social skills, and cultural norms from parents and close relatives. As individuals grow, they continue to be socialised through secondary agents such as schools, peer groups, the media, religion, and the workplace, learning the more specific roles, expectations, and behaviours associated with different social contexts and stages of life. Socialisation is crucial for individuals to become integrated members of their society and for the transmission of culture across generations.
Socialism is an economic system characterised by the collective or public ownership and control of the means of production and distribution of goods and services, with the goal of promoting social equality and meeting the needs of the community rather than maximizing private profit. In socialist systems, there is typically a greater degree of government intervention in the economy compared to capitalism, with the state often playing a significant role in planning and regulating production, managing key industries, and providing social welfare programs. The specific forms and extent of public ownership and control can vary among different socialist models, ranging from democratic socialism to more centrally planned economies.
The societal-reaction approach is another term for labeling theory, a perspective in sociology and criminology that emphasises how societal reactions to an individual's behaviour can lead to the creation and perpetuation of deviance. This theory posits that deviance is not inherent in the act itself but rather a consequence of the application of labels to certain behaviours and individuals by those in positions of power or authority. Once a person is labeled as deviant, this label can negatively impact their self-conception and limit their access to conventional opportunities, potentially leading to further deviance, a process known as deviance amplification. Early proponents like Howard Becker argued that social groups create deviance by making rules whose infraction constitutes deviance and by applying those rules to particular people and labeling them as outsiders. The focus shifts from why individuals initially engage in certain behaviours (primary deviance) to the consequences of being labeled and internalizing that label (secondary deviance).
Societal_Concept_And_Process_Aggregate represents collective entities that embody broader sociological concepts, social processes, or analytical frameworks used to understand societal dynamics and power relationships. These aggregates often represent theoretical constructs that describe how societies function, change, and maintain themselves over time. They include entities that illustrate important sociological theories about elite power, social resistance, and the relationship between economic systems and social organisation. These aggregates serve as concrete examples of abstract sociological concepts, demonstrating how theoretical ideas about society manifest in actual social formations and historical movements. They are crucial for understanding how sociological theory connects to empirical social phenomena and how analytical concepts help explain patterns of social organisation and change.
Societal_Systems_And_Population encompasses large-scale social aggregates that represent comprehensive social, economic, and political arrangements organizing human societies across different levels of development, technological advancement, and global integration. These object aggregates include both entire societies organised around particular modes of production and subsistence, as well as analytical categories that describe different types of populations and social systems. They represent the broadest level of social organisation and collective human arrangement, demonstrating how different societies have developed distinct approaches to organizing production, distribution, governance, and social relationships. The diversity within this domain reflects the historical evolution of human social organisation and the contemporary global system of interconnected but unequal societies with varying levels of technological development and economic power.
Sociobiology is a theoretical approach within the social sciences that involves the systematic study of the biological bases of social behaviour in all kinds of organisms, including humans. It posits that many forms of social behaviour, such as cooperation, altruism, aggression, and mate selection, have a genetic basis and have evolved over time through natural selection to enhance the survival and reproductive success of individuals and their kin. Sociobiology seeks to understand how evolutionary principles and biological factors interact with social and environmental influences to shape patterns of social behaviour in both animal and human societies. While it has provided valuable insights into the biological underpinnings of some social behaviours, it has also been a subject of considerable debate, particularly regarding its applicability to complex human social phenomena and concerns about biological determinism.
Sociocultural evolution is a theoretical perspective in sociology and anthropology that examines the long-term process of change and development in human societies and cultures over time, resulting from the cumulative growth and transmission of their stores of cultural information, knowledge, technologies, and practices across generations. This perspective suggests that societies evolve and become more complex through processes of innovation, adaptation, and the accumulation of cultural capital, leading to transformations in social organisation, technology, economic systems, values, and beliefs. Unlike earlier, often deterministic theories of social evolution, more contemporary approaches recognise that sociocultural evolution is a complex, multilinear process influenced by a variety of factors, including environmental conditions, intergroup interactions, and internal dynamics within societies, and that it does not necessarily follow a fixed or predetermined path.
This sub-category groups fundamental, abstract sociological ideas and phenomena that represent broad principles, conditions, or collective realities within a society. These concepts often provide frameworks for understanding overarching aspects of social life that are not primarily theoretical perspectives, research methodologies, academic disciplines, or specific social structures/institutions. They highlight generalised features or complex phenomena relevant to social analysis.
This sub-category groups established academic disciplines, specialised subfields, and interdisciplinary areas of study within or related to sociology. These fields represent organised bodies of knowledge, theoretical perspectives, and research practices dedicated to the systematic investigation of human society, social behaviour, and social phenomena.
This sub-category groups abstract concepts, specialised fields of study, and key methodological or conceptual tools fundamental to sociological analysis. It encompasses both the intellectual areas where sociological inquiry is conducted and the theoretical or practical constructs that sociologists use to understand, measure, and interpret social phenomena.
This sub-category groups abstract concepts, systems, and frameworks used by sociologists to understand how individuals and groups are categorised, ranked, and organised within social hierarchies. It includes concepts related to social class, status, and the underlying principles of social differentiation and stratification within societies.
This comprehensive category encompasses abstract ideas, analytical frameworks, theoretical constructs, and established methodologies that exist to be realised, applied, or instantiated within sociological inquiry. It serves as a high-level grouping for intellectual artifacts, systems, or plans that guide understanding, research, and social organisation.
This sub-category comprises abstract systems of thought, shared doctrines, and collective convictions that underpin a culture's understanding of reality, morality, and the divine. These systems provide frameworks for interpreting the world, guiding behaviour, and shaping societal values, often serving as foundational elements of religious or philosophical traditions within a social group.
This sub-category encompasses the abstract and shared systems of meaning, beliefs, norms, values, practices, and forms of expression that collectively define a culture or subculture within a society. It includes both tangible and intangible cultural components, as well as the overarching frameworks that shape human interaction, identity, and social organisation, and are transmitted across generations.
This sub-category encompasses the dynamic processes that drive changes in human populations, including fundamental biological occurrences at a societal level (such as births and deaths) and movements of people across geographical territories. It focuses on the quantifiable and patterned aspects of population dynamics and their social implications.
This sub-category encompasses the dynamic processes and activities related to the production, distribution, exchange, and consumption of goods and services within a society, as viewed from a sociological perspective. It focuses on the social organisation and implications of economic operations, from industrial practices to market interactions.
This sub-category groups abstract systems, frameworks, and dominant ideologies that define how societies organise the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. It includes various economic models, philosophies, and the principles underlying societal resource allocation, often with profound implications for social structure and inequality.
This sub-category encompasses dynamic processes that describe the interaction, transformation, or impact between human societies and their natural environment. It focuses on large-scale environmental changes that are influenced by social factors or that have significant social consequences.
This sub-category includes dynamic processes representing unique social phenomena or events that are studied for their specific characteristics and impacts, often not fitting neatly into broader categories of social change, interaction, or control. These processes highlight particular occurrences or effects observed in social contexts.
This sub-category encompasses abstract systems, patterns, and established relationships that define and organise familial and kinship ties within a society. It includes various forms of marriage, descent systems, residential patterns, and the fundamental rules governing family formation, inheritance, and social obligations across generations.
This sub-category encompasses core, abstract sociological concepts and frameworks that describe the fundamental nature, organisation, and functioning of social reality and collective life. It includes the underlying principles, forms, and inherent characteristics of societies and their various components, as viewed from a sociological perspective.
This sub-category comprises the most fundamental and overarching theoretical frameworks in sociology, serving as foundational lenses for understanding the entire social world. These theories provide broad conceptual tools and systematic approaches that guide the analysis of social phenomena, societal structure, and human behaviour across various levels of sociological inquiry.
The sociological imagination is a concept developed by sociologist C. Wright Mills that refers to the ability to think imaginatively and critically about the relationship between personal troubles and public issues, linking individual experiences to broader social, historical, and cultural contexts. It involves "thinking oneself away" from the familiar routines of day-to-day life and viewing one's own society as an outsider would, to understand the social forces that shape individual lives and societal patterns. The sociological imagination enables us to see that personal problems, such as unemployment or poverty, are often symptoms of larger social issues rather than simply individual failings, and it encourages us to ask critical questions about the social world and the ways in which it is organised and experienced by different groups of people.
Sociological_Material_Entity encompasses concrete, tangible objects, institutions, and material arrangements that have sociological significance and serve as important components in social processes, relationships, and structures. This category includes both individual material actors and institutional arrangements that shape social life through their material properties and social functions. It covers technological infrastructure such as the Internet, which has fundamentally transformed social communication and interaction patterns. Material culture represents the physical objects and artifacts through which societies express and transmit cultural meanings and values. The category includes specific social roles with material dimensions, such as entrepreneurs who organise economic resources and professional criminals who operate within illegal economic markets. Institutional arrangements are represented through concepts like total institutions, which are material environments designed to control and reshape individual behaviour, and sweatshops, which represent specific forms of exploitative labor organisation. Research tools represent the material instruments through which sociological knowledge is produced and validated. These entities demonstrate the materiality of social life, showing how physical objects, spaces, and arrangements both shape and are shaped by social processes, serving as both constraints and resources for social action and organisation.
This sub-category encompasses the abstract and shared systems of rules, standards, expectations, and principles that guide collective behaviour and shape moral judgments within a society. It includes both explicit, codified regulations and implicit cultural expectations, reflecting what is deemed desirable, appropriate, or important in various social contexts.
This sub-category comprises the dynamic processes through which power is exercised, organised, and legitimised within societies. It includes the activities of governance, political decision-making, and the exertion of influence and control within political systems.
This sub-category groups abstract concepts, organisational forms, and frameworks related to the organisation, exercise, and legitimation of power, authority, and collective decision-making within societies. It includes various forms of government, political ideologies, and the principles governing state-citizen relations, which are crucial for understanding social order and political dynamics.
This sub-category encompasses theoretical frameworks that emerged as critiques of traditional sociological thought, particularly challenging grand narratives, universal truths, and fixed structures. These theories emphasise relativism, deconstruction, and the fluidity of meaning and power in society, often exploring fragmented realities, discourse, and the social construction of knowledge in contemporary contexts.
This sub-category includes dynamic processes related to the introduction, spread, and transmission of new elements, ideas, or practices within and between cultures. It captures how cultural forms are generated, adapted, and passed across generations, influencing societal evolution.
This sub-category encompasses the dynamic activities and mechanisms through which societies define, produce, and respond to behaviours that violate established social norms, rules, or laws. It includes both the acts of norm-breaking (deviance) and the subsequent societal efforts to regulate, manage, and sanction such behaviours to maintain social order.
This sub-category comprises the dynamic patterns by which individuals and groups mutually influence each other and create shared meanings through direct or indirect exchange. These processes are foundational to the formation of social relationships, the construction of reality, and the daily flow of information and understanding within society, occurring at both micro and meso levels of social life.
This sub-category comprises the dynamic and often complex processes that bring about significant alterations in societal structures, cultural norms, values, and human behaviours over time. These processes are fundamental to how societies evolve, adapt, and are reshaped by internal and external forces, driving long-term development, progress, or disruption across various dimensions of social life.
This sub-category encompasses the dynamic and lifelong processes through which individuals acquire and internalise the norms, values, beliefs, and behaviours of their culture and society, developing a distinct sense of self and identity. It also includes key developmental processes and transitional stages that shape human social experience across the life course.
This sub-category encompasses large-scale, dynamic processes that fundamentally alter the economic and social organisation of societies over time. These transformations are often driven by industrial, technological, or systemic shifts and involve profound changes in production methods, labor markets, wealth distribution, and the structure of urban life. They reshape societal hierarchies, institutions, and the daily experiences of individuals, impacting social mobility, inequality, and overall societal development. Examples include transitions from agrarian to industrial societies, shifts in economic paradigms, and the social consequences of technological advancements and environmental changes on human populations. These processes are complex, often long-term, and can lead to both progress and significant social disruption.
Sociological_Quality encompasses measurable characteristics, attributes, conditions, and properties that describe and quantify various aspects of social life, social structures, and social processes. This category includes demographic measures such as birth rates, death rates, fertility rates, and mortality statistics that capture population dynamics and health patterns. Economic indicators like GDP and measures of poverty (absolute and relative) quantify material conditions and economic inequality. Social psychological concepts such as alienation, anomie, identity, and personality describe individual and collective states of being within social contexts. The category encompasses various forms of social inequality and discrimination including racism, sexism, ageism, and homophobia, as well as measures of social stratification and class consciousness. Cultural concepts such as cultural diversity, cultural lag, and culture shock describe the dynamics of cultural change and interaction. Methodological qualities include reliability, validity, correlation coefficients, and various statistical measures used in social research. Social cohesion, solidarity, and social integration represent qualities of group and societal functioning. These qualities serve as both analytical tools for understanding social phenomena and as substantive characteristics that describe the conditions, states, and properties that characterise different aspects of social reality and human social experience.
This sub-category includes the diverse set of established techniques, systematic procedures, and fundamental conceptual tools that sociologists employ to gather, analyse, and interpret data in a rigorous and scientific manner. It encompasses methodological approaches, research designs, and core principles guiding empirical inquiry into social phenomena.
This sub-category covers the dynamic activities and steps involved in the systematic investigation and acquisition of knowledge about social phenomena. It includes the actual conduct of research methodologies, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, and the execution of experiments and observations within sociological inquiry
This sub-category encompasses abstract concepts related to the patterns, forms, and principles governing how individuals and groups are interconnected and arranged within society. It includes various types of social ties, kinship systems, marital structures, and fundamental organisational principles that shape social interaction and collective life.
This sub-category includes overarching intellectual approaches, comprehensive sets of statements, and systematic conceptual frameworks that seek to explain, interpret, and predict patterns in the social world. These theories and perspectives provide fundamental lenses through which sociological phenomena are analysed.
This sub-category encompasses various theoretical frameworks and sociological approaches that attempt to explain why individuals or groups violate social norms, rules, or laws, and how such norm-breaking behaviour emerges and is sustained in society. These theories analyse the causes, patterns, and social consequences of deviant behaviour in various social contexts.
This sub-category groups theoretical frameworks that attempt to explain the long-term development, progression, and transformation of human societies and cultures over time. These theories analyse the driving forces, patterns, and mechanisms of societal change, often considering concepts of progress, complexity, and adaptation, and may draw parallels to biological evolutionary processes.
Sociological Theory is a comprehensive meta-category encompassing systematic frameworks, sets of statements, and interconnected propositions that seek to explain, interpret, and predict patterns, problems, and changes in the social world. Theories provide lenses through which sociologists examine human behaviour, social interactions, social groups, institutions, and entire societies. This domain includes foundational perspectives like functionalism (emphasizing societal stability and integration), conflict theory (focusing on power struggles and inequality), and symbolic interactionism (highlighting meaning-making in micro-interactions). It also covers specific theories (e.g., Anomie theory of deviance, World-systems theory, Modernisation theory), and broader intellectual movements (e.g., Postmodernism, Poststructuralism). Sociological theory guides research questions, informs data analysis, and contributes to a deeper understanding of the complexities of social life, offering explanations for why societies are organised the way they are and how they change.
Sociology is the systematic and scientific study of human groups, societies, social interactions, and the social forces that shape human behaviour, giving particular emphasis to the analysis of the industrialised world and modern complex societies. It is one of a group of social sciences, which also includes anthropology, economics, political science, and human geography, all of which share a common interest in understanding various aspects of human society, although they may focus on different dimensions or use different approaches. Sociology employs a diverse range of theoretical perspectives and research methods to investigate social phenomena at different levels of analysis, from micro-level interactions between individuals to macro-level patterns in social institutions and global processes, aiming to develop a deeper understanding of how societies function, how social change occurs, and how social life is organised and experienced by individuals and groups.
The sociology of deviance is a specialised branch within the broader field of sociology that is specifically concerned with the systematic study of behaviours, actions, or characteristics that violate social norms and expectations, and with understanding the social processes through which some behaviours and individuals come to be identified, defined, and treated as deviant within a society. This field explores a wide range of topics, including the social construction of deviance, the different theories that attempt to explain why deviance occurs (such as strain theory, labeling theory, and conflict theory), the social control mechanisms that societies use to regulate deviance, the consequences of deviance for individuals and society, and the social and cultural variations in what is considered deviant across different groups and time periods.
The sociology of the body is a specialised branch of sociology that focuses on how our bodies are shaped by social influences, cultural norms, and social structures, examining the body not just as a biological entity but also as a social object that is experienced, understood, and regulated within social contexts. This field explores a wide range of topics, including how social factors influence health and illness (as in social epidemiology), the social construction of beauty and body ideals, the impact of social inequalities on bodily experiences, the ways in which bodies are disciplined and controlled by social institutions, and the role of the body in social interaction and the construction of identity. It emphasises that our understanding and experience of our own bodies and the bodies of others are deeply intertwined with social and cultural forces.
Solidarity, in the work of Émile Durkheim, refers to the internal forces of social cohesion, unity, and integration that hold a society together and create a sense of collective identity and shared purpose among its members. Durkheim distinguished between two main types of solidarity: mechanical solidarity, found in traditional societies based on shared values, beliefs, and common experiences, and organic solidarity, prevalent in modern, complex societies characterised by a high division of labor and interdependence among individuals with different roles and functions. More generally, the term "solidarity" is often used, particularly by those on the left of the political spectrum, to describe the political consciousness, unity, and mutual support among members of an emerging class or group who are struggling against oppression or seeking to achieve common goals, such as working-class solidarity in the face of economic inequality.
Spatial_And_Environmental_Study represents sociological approaches that examine the fundamental relationships between human societies and their physical environments, focusing on how spatial arrangements and environmental conditions shape social organisation and human behaviour. This domain integrates ecological thinking with sociological analysis to understand the complex interactions between social systems and their environmental contexts. It emphasises the mutual constitution of social and spatial relationships, recognizing that human societies both shape and are shaped by their physical environments. The field employs ecological metaphors and concepts to analyse social phenomena, examining how environmental factors influence social structures, community formation, and human adaptation. These approaches contribute to understanding urbanisation processes, environmental sustainability challenges, and the social dimensions of environmental change. The domain bridges sociology with environmental studies, geography, and urban planning, offering insights into how spatial organisation affects social life and how social processes create and modify physical environments. This interdisciplinary perspective is increasingly important for addressing contemporary challenges related to climate change, urbanisation, and sustainable development, providing analytical frameworks for understanding the social dimensions of environmental issues.
Specialised_Institutional_Group encompasses collective entities that emerge around specific functional purposes, professional activities, or quality improvement initiatives within larger organisational contexts. These aggregates represent focused, often temporary or project-based collectives that bring together individuals with particular expertise or shared involvement in specific work processes. They typically operate within larger institutional frameworks but maintain distinct identities and purposes related to their specialised functions. These groups demonstrate how modern complex organisations generate sub-aggregates to address specific technical, professional, or improvement objectives. They often emphasise collaborative problem-solving, knowledge sharing, and continuous improvement processes, reflecting contemporary organisational trends toward participatory management and worker empowerment in achieving institutional goals.
Specialised_Sociological_Subfield represents focused analytical domains that examine specific aspects of social life through concentrated theoretical and empirical investigation. These subfields develop specialised conceptual frameworks, methodological approaches, and research traditions to analyse particular social phenomena with depth and precision. They represent the maturation of sociological inquiry into distinct areas of expertise that require specialised knowledge and analytical tools. Each subfield has developed its own theoretical traditions, research methodologies, and scholarly communities while maintaining connections to broader sociological theory and method. These domains demonstrate sociology's capacity to generate focused analytical frameworks for understanding complex social phenomena that require specialised attention. They contribute to the discipline's theoretical sophistication by developing nuanced understanding of specific social processes, structures, and experiences. The subfields collectively illustrate sociology's analytical diversity and its ability to address varied aspects of social life through targeted scholarly investigation, contributing specialised knowledge that informs both academic understanding and practical interventions in their respective domains.
Squatter settlements are informal and often unplanned areas of housing that are typically occupied by the very poor on the fringes of cities or in other marginal urban spaces, where residents do not have legal rights to the land they occupy or the dwellings they construct. Housing in squatter settlements is often self-built by the settlers themselves using whatever discarded or inexpensive materials they can find, resulting in makeshift structures that may lack basic amenities such as clean water, sanitation, electricity, and secure tenure. These settlements often emerge due to rapid urbanisation, poverty, lack of affordable housing, and inadequate urban planning, and they can face challenges related to overcrowding, health risks, and the threat of eviction. Sociologists study squatter settlements to understand the living conditions, social organisation, and the struggles for recognition and basic rights faced by their residents, as well as the broader issues of urban poverty and inequality.
The state in sociology refers to a political apparatus or organised structure of rule that governs a specific territory and its population, characterised by its authority, which is generally backed by law, and its capacity to use force to maintain order and enforce its policies. It typically includes governmental institutions such as the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, as well as the civil service officials who administer state functions. A key feature of the state is its claim to sovereignty over the territory and its citizens, meaning it asserts the ultimate authority within its borders, often recognised by other states in the international system. The state plays a crucial role in establishing and enforcing laws, providing public services, regulating the economy, and defending its territory and interests, often relying on a monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within its boundaries to ensure compliance and maintain social order.
Statistical_And_Analytical_Measurement_Quality encompasses numerical and analytical characteristics used to describe, measure, and analyse social phenomena and population characteristics. These qualities include various statistical measures, demographic indicators, and analytical concepts that help quantify and understand social patterns and relationships. They represent the mathematical and analytical tools that social scientists use to describe populations, measure relationships between variables, and test hypotheses about social phenomena. These qualities are essential for the empirical study of society and provide the foundation for evidence-based understanding of social patterns and trends.
Status, in sociological terms, refers to any of the full range of socially defined positions that an individual can occupy within a large group or society. Statuses provide a framework for social organisation and interaction, as they come with associated roles, expectations, rights, and obligations that guide how individuals are expected to behave in different social contexts. As mentioned previously, statuses can be either ascribed, assigned to an individual at birth or involuntarily, or achieved, attained through personal effort or choice. An individual typically holds multiple statuses simultaneously, forming their status set, and one status may become more significant than others in shaping their social identity and interactions; this is known as a master status.
A status group, as defined by Max Weber, is a category of people within a society who share a similar level of social prestige, honor, or lifestyle, which may or may not be directly related to their economic class position. Membership in a status group is often based on shared attributes such as ethnicity, religion, occupation, education, or family background, which are socially valued or devalued and contribute to a sense of collective identity and social standing. Status groups are characterised by a shared style of life, which can include distinctive patterns of consumption, social interaction, and cultural practices. While class refers to economic position in the market, status is about social honor and can influence social interactions and access to certain social circles or opportunities, sometimes independently of economic factors.
A status set refers to the complete collection or group of all the social statuses that a single individual occupies at a particular point in time. Each person holds multiple statuses simultaneously, which can include ascribed statuses (those assigned at birth or involuntary, such as age, sex, and race) and achieved statuses (those acquired through personal effort or choice, such as occupation, education level, and marital status). The various statuses within an individual's status set can sometimes intersect and influence one another, shaping their social identity, experiences, and interactions with others. For example, a person might be a female, a doctor, a mother, and a member of a particular ethnic group, all of which contribute to their overall social position and how they are perceived and treated by society.
A stereotype is a fixed, overgeneralised, and often negative characterisation or set of beliefs about a particular group of people, based on simplified or exaggerated assumptions that are applied to all members of the group, regardless of individual differences. Stereotypes can be based on various social categories such as race, ethnicity, gender, age, religion, or occupation, and they are often learned through socialisation and perpetuated by cultural norms and media representations. Stereotypes can lead to prejudice, discrimination, and unfair treatment of individuals based solely on their group membership, as they ignore the diversity and complexity within groups and can be resistant to change even in the face of contradictory evidence.
Stigma refers to a negative label, mark of disgrace, or social disapproval that is used to devalue members of deviant social groups or individuals who possess certain characteristics or attributes that are seen as undesirable or different from the prevailing social norms. A stigma can be attached to various conditions, behaviours, or identities, such as mental illness, criminal history, physical disabilities, certain lifestyles, or membership in particular social groups. The process of stigmatisation can lead to social exclusion, discrimination, prejudice, and a loss of social status for the stigmatised individuals or groups, often impacting their self-esteem, social interactions, and opportunities in life. Labeling theory in sociology highlights the role of stigma in the social construction of deviance and its consequences for those who are labeled.
Stratification in sociology refers to a structured ranking of entire groups of people within a society that perpetuates unequal economic rewards, power, social status, and life chances across different social strata or layers. This hierarchical arrangement is based on various social categories such as social class, race, ethnicity, gender, age, and other factors, leading to systematic inequalities in access to resources and opportunities. While some forms of social differentiation may exist in all societies, stratification implies a more enduring and institutionalised pattern of inequality where certain groups consistently have more advantages and privileges than others. Sociologists study social stratification to understand its causes, consequences, and the ways in which it shapes social life and individual experiences.
Stratification_And_Class_Aggregate encompasses collective entities defined by shared economic position, social status, and relationship to systems of production that create hierarchical arrangements within society. These aggregates represent how economic inequality and power differentials become organised into distinct social classes with different life chances, lifestyles, and political interests. They reflect the fundamental structure of inequality in modern societies and the ways in which economic positions become translated into broader patterns of social stratification. These class aggregates often develop distinct cultures, political orientations, and collective interests that shape broader social and political dynamics. Understanding these aggregates is crucial for analysing how economic systems generate and maintain social inequality and how class consciousness and conflict emerge from structural positions within the economy.
A strike is a temporary stoppage of work or a collective withdrawal of labor by a group of workers or employees from their workplace as a form of protest or to exert pressure on their employer to meet specific demands or grievances, such as for better wages, improved working conditions, job security, or other employment-related issues. Strikes are a key tactic used by labor unions as part of collective bargaining to negotiate with employers and advocate for the rights and interests of their members. The decision to strike is often a significant one, involving a collective vote by union members, and it can have economic and social consequences for both the workers and the employer.
Structural functionalism is a major theoretical perspective in sociology that is rooted in the work of Émile Durkheim and further developed by Talcott Parsons and Robert Merton. This perspective analyses societies as complex social systems composed of various interconnected social institutions (such as the family, education, religion, government, and the economy), each of which performs specific functions that contribute to the overall stability, order, and smooth operation of the system as a whole. Structural functionalists examine how these institutions work together to meet the needs of society and maintain social equilibrium through shared norms, values, and consensus. They often focus on the functions (both manifest and latent) of social structures and how they contribute to social cohesion and the maintenance of social order.
Structuration is a sociological theory, most prominently associated with the work of Anthony Giddens, that attempts to bridge the divide between agency (the actions of individuals) and social structure (the broader social forces and institutions that shape those actions). It posits that social structure and human agency are not separate or opposing forces but are mutually dependent and interactive in a two-way process. Individuals shape their social world through their everyday actions and practices, but these actions are also enabled and constrained by existing social structures, which in turn are reproduced and sometimes transformed through those very actions. Structuration emphasises the dynamic and recursive relationship between individual agency and social structure, highlighting how they continuously influence and reshape each other over time.
A subculture is a segment of society that shares a distinctive pattern of mores (norms deemed highly necessary to the welfare of a society), folkways (norms governing everyday social behaviour), values, beliefs, and often behaviours that differ from the dominant patterns of the larger society to which it belongs. Members of a subculture typically identify with each other and may share common interests, lifestyles, or social characteristics that set them apart from the mainstream culture. Subcultures can emerge based on a variety of factors, including age, ethnicity, social class, religion, occupation, sexual orientation, or shared hobbies and interests, and they can manifest in distinct styles of dress, language (including argot or specialised language), music preferences, and social practices. While subcultures maintain their own unique characteristics, they are still part of and interact with the broader society, sometimes influencing it and sometimes being influenced by it. The study of subcultures helps sociologists understand the diversity within societies and the ways in which different groups navigate and express their identities within a larger cultural context.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, a suburb is defined as any territory within a metropolitan statistical area (MSA) that is not included in the central city or cities of that MSA. Metropolitan areas are typically defined as having at least one urbanised area of 50,000 or more people, plus adjacent territory that has a high degree of social and economic integration with the core urban area, as measured by commuting ties. Suburbs are often characterised by lower population density compared to central cities, a higher proportion of single-family homes, and a greater reliance on automobiles for transportation. They have become a significant form of residential and commercial development in many industrialised countries, often representing a migration of population and economic activity away from the central urban core. The development and characteristics of suburbs are influenced by various factors, including transportation infrastructure, housing policies, economic trends, and social preferences.
In an economic and sociological context, Surplus primarily refers to an excess of production or resources beyond what is immediately needed or consumed. This category often relates to the concept of "surplus value" in Marxist theory, which describes the value of a worker's labor that is "left over" after the cost of their wages has been repaid to the employer, constituting the capitalist's profit and representing a form of exploitation. Beyond this specific Marxist usage, "surplus" can also describe any excess production (e.g., agricultural surplus allowing for specialisation and urbanisation) or resources accumulated by a society beyond its immediate subsistence needs. The generation and distribution of surplus are central to understanding economic systems, social stratification, and the development of more complex societies, as it allows for investment, the division of labor, and the emergence of non-productive classes.
In Marxist economic theory, surplus value is the difference between the value of the goods or services produced by a worker's labor power and the wages the employer pays for that labor power; it is the value of the worker's labor that is 'left over' after the employer has covered all the costs involved in hiring the worker, including wages and the costs of production. According to Marx, this surplus value is the source of capitalist profit and represents the exploitation of the proletariat (working class) by the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) because the workers do not receive the full value of what they produce; instead, the surplus is appropriated by the capitalists who own the means of production. The extraction of surplus value is seen by Marx as a fundamental characteristic of capitalism and a key driver of the inherent conflict between the interests of capitalists and workers.
A survey is a widely used method of sociological research that typically involves the systematic administration of a standardised set of questions, often in the form of questionnaires, to a sample of individuals drawn from a larger population being studied. The goal of a survey is to collect data on the attitudes, beliefs, behaviours, opinions, or characteristics of the population of interest through the responses provided by the sample members. The data collected through surveys is often analysed using statistical techniques to identify patterns, regularities, and relationships between variables within the population. Surveys can be conducted in various formats, including mail-in questionnaires, telephone interviews, face-to-face interviews, and online surveys, each with its own advantages and limitations in terms of cost, response rates, and the type of data that can be collected. The quality of a survey depends on factors such as the design of the questions, the selection of a representative sample, and the rate of response from the participants.
Sustainable development is a concept and an approach to economic growth and social progress that emphasises the need to meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. It is based on the principle that economic development should proceed in a way that natural resources are used responsibly and, where possible, recycled rather than depleted, biodiversity is maintained and protected, and clean air, water, and land are safeguarded for the long-term well-being of both human societies and the environment. Sustainable development seeks to integrate economic, social, and environmental considerations in decision-making, recognizing the interconnectedness of these dimensions and the importance of balancing them to achieve a more equitable and environmentally sound future for all.
Sweatshop is a derogatory term used to describe a factory, workshop, or other place of work in which employees are subjected to exploitative labor practices, including working long hours for very low wages, often under poor, unsafe, or unhealthy working conditions that may violate labor laws and basic human rights. Sweatshops are often associated with industries that have high labor intensity and operate in countries or regions with lax labor regulations or weak enforcement, where the pressure to produce goods at very low costs can lead to the exploitation of workers, including women and children. The issue of sweatshops has gained international attention due to concerns about fair labor practices, human rights, and the ethical implications of global supply chains.
Symbol are the gestures, objects, words, images, sounds, or events that form the basis of human communication by carrying a particular meaning or set of meanings that are recognised and shared by people within a specific culture or social group. Symbol are arbitrary in that the meaning is not inherent in the symbol itself but is socially constructed and learned through cultural transmission and interaction. They can represent abstract ideas, emotions, values, or concrete objects, and they are essential for communication, social interaction, and the creation and maintenance of culture. Language, with its system of words as symbols, is a fundamental aspect of symbolic communication, but nonverbal cues such as gestures, facial expressions, and material objects can also serve as powerful symbols with shared cultural meanings.
Symbolic interactionism is a micro-level theoretical approach in sociology, primarily developed by George Herbert Mead and Herbert Blumer, that places a strong emphasis on the role of symbols and language as core elements of all human interaction and the social construction of meaning. This perspective views society as a product of everyday social interactions among individuals who communicate and interpret the world around them through shared symbols and meanings. Symbolic interactionists focus on how individuals create, negotiate, and modify meanings through their interactions, and how these meanings shape their behaviour and social reality. Key concepts in symbolic interactionism include the self, the looking-glass self, the generalised other, and the importance of language and symbols in shaping human thought and action within social contexts.
The teacher-expectancy effect, also known as the Pygmalion effect in education, refers to the impact that a teacher's expectations, beliefs, or predictions about a student's academic performance or potential can have on the student's actual achievements and learning outcomes. Research has shown that when teachers hold high expectations for certain students, they may unconsciously treat those students in ways that encourage and facilitate their success, leading to improved performance that confirms the initial expectations. Conversely, low expectations can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy where students perform poorly because their teachers do not believe in their ability to succeed and may provide less support or fewer opportunities. This effect highlights the powerful role of social expectations and interactions in shaping educational outcomes.
Temporary_And_Situational_Collective represents aggregates that form spontaneously or temporarily around specific events, situations, or shared experiences, characterised by loose organisation and relatively brief duration. These collectives demonstrate how social aggregation can emerge rapidly in response to immediate circumstances or shared focus of attention, often involving individuals who may not know each other personally but who find themselves in similar situations or responding to common stimuli. While these aggregates may lack the formal structure or lasting bonds of more established groups, they can exhibit powerful collective behaviour and shared emotional experiences. They illustrate the dynamic and fluid nature of social aggregation and how social order can emerge even in temporary or spontaneous situations through shared attention and mutual influence.
Theism is a broad category of beliefs that encompasses the belief in the existence of a god or gods who are typically seen as the creators and sustainers of the universe and who may intervene in the world and the lives of humans. Theism can take various forms, including monotheism (belief in one God), polytheism (belief in multiple gods), and pantheism (belief that God is immanent in all of nature). Theistic beliefs often involve a relationship between humanity and the divine, which may include prayer, worship, and adherence to religious doctrines or moral codes. Theism has been a dominant feature of many cultures and societies throughout history, shaping religious practices, ethical systems, and worldviews.
Theoretical_And_Conceptual_Framework_Quality represents abstract theoretical concepts and analytical frameworks that sociologists use to understand and explain social phenomena. These qualities include various theoretical constructs, conceptual distinctions, and analytical categories that help organise and interpret social reality. They encompass both empirical concepts that describe observable social phenomena and theoretical concepts that explain underlying social processes and relationships. These qualities provide the intellectual foundation for sociological analysis and represent the accumulated wisdom and theoretical development of the discipline.
Theoretical_Concepts_And_Analytical_Framework encompasses the conceptual tools and analytical perspectives that sociologists use to interpret data, understand social phenomena, and construct theoretical explanations. This category includes fundamental analytical concepts like Pierre Bourdieu's cultural capital, which explains how knowledge, skills, and cultural resources translate into social advantages and reproduce inequality across generations. Max Weber's ideal type methodology provides a framework for constructing analytical models that highlight essential characteristics of social phenomena. Data analysis concepts encompass the statistical and interpretive tools necessary for making sense of empirical findings. Inequality concepts provide vocabulary for understanding social stratification and differential access to resources and opportunities. Interpretative sociology emphasises the subjective meanings and cultural understandings that shape social action. Semiotics offers tools for analysing symbols and signs in communication and cultural systems. These frameworks bridge the gap between empirical observation and theoretical understanding, providing sociologists with sophisticated analytical lenses for interpreting complex social realities and developing comprehensive explanations of social structures, processes, and cultural meanings.
Theories of Deviance is a crucial sub-category within the broader study of deviance and social control, encompassing various theoretical frameworks that attempt to explain why individuals or groups violate social norms, rules, or laws, and how such norm-breaking behaviour emerges and is sustained in society. This domain includes micro-level theories focusing on individual-level factors and learning processes, such as differential association theory (deviance learned through social interaction) and control theory (deviance prevented by social bonds). It also covers macro-level theories that examine how societal structures and processes contribute to deviance, including anomie theory (strain from mismatch between goals and means), labeling theory (deviance as a social construct through societal reaction), and routine activities theory (convergence of motivated offenders, suitable targets, and lack of guardianship). These diverse theoretical approaches offer different lenses through which to analyse the causes, patterns, and social consequences of deviant behaviour in various social contexts.
In sociology, a theory is a set of logically interconnected statements, concepts, and propositions that seeks to explain problems, actions, behaviour, social phenomena, or the relationships between them in a systematic and coherent way. Theories provide frameworks for understanding the social world, offering explanations for why certain things happen, how they happen, and under what conditions. They are developed through observation, research, and logical reasoning, and they can be broad in scope, attempting to explain large-scale social patterns (grand theories), or more focused, addressing specific aspects of social life (middle-range theories). Sociological theories guide research by suggesting questions to ask, concepts to consider, and relationships to examine, and they are constantly being tested, refined, and sometimes revised or replaced as new evidence emerges and our understanding of the social world evolves.
The term "Third World" was a historical and somewhat outdated categorisation used during the Cold War era to refer to the less developed societies and nations in the world that were not aligned with either the First World (Western industrialised capitalist countries) or the Second World (communist and socialist states led by the Soviet Union). These countries, often located in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, were typically characterised by low levels of industrialisation, poverty, and dependence on agriculture or the extraction of raw materials. The majority of the world's population lived in Third World countries during this period. With the end of the Cold War and the increasing complexity of global economic and political landscapes, the term "Third World" has become less commonly used and is often considered problematic due to its overgeneralisation and implication of a hierarchical global order. More contemporary and nuanced terms like "developing countries," "low- and middle-income countries," or specific regional classifications are now generally preferred.
Total institutions, a term popularised by sociologist Erving Goffman, refer to facilities such as asylums for the mentally ill, prisons, monasteries, military barracks, and boarding schools that exert a pervasive and encompassing influence on the lives of their residents by imposing a forcibly regulated system of existence in complete or near-complete isolation from the outside world. These institutions are characterised by a breakdown of the barriers separating the three spheres of life that are usually distinct: sleep, work, and play; all aspects of life are conducted in the same place and under the same single authority. Residents typically experience a loss of autonomy and personal identity as their daily routines are strictly controlled, and they are subjected to a uniform system of rules and regulations aimed at managing large groups of people within the confines of the institution. Goffman's analysis of total institutions highlighted the processes of resocialisation and the potential for the stripping away of former identities and the adoption of an institutional identity among residents.
Totemism is a system of religious belief and practice, often found in indigenous societies, which attributes sacred or divine properties and symbolic significance to a particular type of animal, plant, natural object, or even a mythical being, known as a totem. The totem serves as an emblem or symbol for a group, such as a clan or lineage, representing its identity, origin, and its spiritual or mystical relationship with the natural world. Members of the group may have specific rituals, obligations, or prohibitions associated with their totem, such as not hunting or eating the animal, or showing it particular reverence. Totemism often reinforces social cohesion and group solidarity by providing a shared symbol of identity and a framework for understanding the group's place within the broader ecological and spiritual order.
Tracking, in the context of education, is the practice of placing students in specific curriculum groups or academic programs within a school system based on their perceived academic abilities, which are often assessed through standardised test scores, prior academic performance, or teacher recommendations. This practice can result in students being separated into different tracks, such as "high-achieving," "average," or "low-achieving," which may offer different levels of academic rigor, resources, and future opportunities. While proponents argue that tracking allows teachers to tailor instruction to the specific needs of students at different academic levels, critics raise concerns about its potential to perpetuate social inequalities, as students from disadvantaged backgrounds may be disproportionately placed in lower tracks, limiting their educational attainment and future prospects, while those in higher tracks often receive more enriched learning experiences and better preparation for college. The effects of tracking on student achievement and social equity remain a subject of ongoing debate in educational sociology.
Trade unions, also known as labor unions, are organisations formed by workers in a specific trade, industry, or company with the primary purpose of maintaining or improving the conditions of their employment. These conditions typically include attaining better wages and benefits, improving working conditions, and enhancing safety standards in the workplace. Trade unions operate through elected leadership and bargaining committees that negotiate with employers on behalf of their members in a process known as collective bargaining, aiming to establish labor contracts or collective bargaining agreements that outline the terms of employment. Unions may organise workers based on their specific skills (craft unionism), across various trades (general unionism), or within an entire industry (industrial unionism). Historically, trade unions emerged in response to the often precarious and exploitative conditions faced by workers, particularly during the Industrial Revolution, providing a collective voice and power to negotiate for fairer treatment and improved livelihoods. They have played a significant role in advocating for workers' rights, safer workplaces, and the end of child labor, often operating with a democratic structure where members elect officers and pay dues to support the union's activities.
Traditional authority, as defined by Max Weber, is a form of legitimate power that is conferred by custom, established traditions, and accepted practices that have been passed down over time. This type of authority is often associated with hereditary leadership, where the right to rule is inherited through family lineage and is accepted as legitimate because it has always been that way. Obedience is owed to the person in authority due to their traditional status and the sanctity of established customs, rather than based on their personal charisma or legally defined rules. Examples of traditional authority can be found in monarchies where power is passed down through royal families, or in traditional tribal societies where leadership is based on long-standing customs and norms. Weber contrasted traditional authority with charismatic authority, which is based on the exceptional personal appeal of a leader, and rational-legal authority, which is based on formally established rules and laws.
A triad is a social group consisting of three members, representing the simplest form of a group that allows for complexities of interaction beyond a dyad (a two-member group). The addition of a third member introduces new dynamics and possibilities for social interaction that are not present in a dyad. For example, in a triad, there is the potential for one member to act as a mediator or arbitrator in disputes between the other two, which is not possible in a dyad where conflict can only be resolved directly or lead to the dissolution of the group. A triad can also experience the formation of coalitions or alliances between two members, potentially leaving the third member isolated or in a minority position. The presence of three individuals can also diffuse intensity compared to a dyad, making the group potentially more stable as the loss of one member does not necessarily lead to the group's termination. The study of triads is important in sociology for understanding basic group dynamics and the emergence of social structures within small groups.
The unconscious, in the context of sociology (drawing from psychoanalytic theory), refers to the realm of experiences, memories, desires, and feelings that become too difficult or painful for an individual to confront directly and are thus hidden from their conscious awareness, yet can still exert a powerful influence on their thoughts, emotions, and behaviours. While primarily a concept in psychology, the idea of the unconscious can have sociological relevance in understanding deeply ingrained social norms, cultural values, and hidden biases that may operate at a level below conscious awareness and shape social interactions, attitudes, and societal patterns. For example, unconscious biases related to race, gender, or social class can influence discriminatory behaviours even in individuals who consciously believe in equality. The exploration of the unconscious, often through methods like psychoanalysis, can provide insights into the deeper, often unacknowledged, motivations and influences that underlie human behaviour and social phenomena.
The underclass is a term used in sociology to describe a group of people who are considered to be 'under' or outside the traditional class structure of society, often characterised by chronic poverty, long-term unemployment or underemployment, social isolation, and economic, political, and social marginalisation and exclusion. Members of the underclass may experience multiple and overlapping forms of disadvantage, including limited access to education, healthcare, stable housing, and social support networks, often leading to a cycle of poverty that is difficult to escape. The concept of the underclass is often associated with inner-city areas and may be linked to factors such as deindustrialisation, lack of job opportunities, and systemic discrimination. There is ongoing debate among sociologists about the definition, causes, and consequences of the underclass, as well as the most effective ways to address the complex issues of poverty and social exclusion that affect this group.
Underdevelopment is a concept used in social science, particularly in the context of global inequality and post-colonial studies, to describe the economic state of societies, primarily in the Global South, that were historically exploited and/or previously colonised by Western countries during the periods of colonialism. This perspective suggests that the current state of poverty and limited economic development in many of these societies is not simply a natural or inevitable condition but is, in part, a result of historical processes of exploitation and dependence imposed by powerful, wealthy states, which actively extracted resources, disrupted local economies, and established unequal trade relationships that continue to disadvantage these nations. Underdevelopment theory emphasises the historical and ongoing power dynamics between developed and developing countries, highlighting how the wealth and prosperity of some nations may have been built upon the exploitation and impoverishment of others, perpetuating a cycle of dependence and hindering genuine economic development in the formerly colonised regions.
The underground economy, also known as the shadow economy or informal economy, refers to economic activity that generates income but is unreported to the government as required by law, often to avoid taxation or regulation. This can include a wide range of activities, both legal and illegal, such as undeclared cash transactions, off-the-books employment, informal services, the sale of illegal goods, and other economic exchanges that take place outside the formal, regulated sector of the economy. The size and nature of the underground economy can vary significantly across different countries and regions, influenced by factors such as tax rates, regulatory burdens, levels of corruption, and the availability of formal employment opportunities. While it can provide income for individuals who may be excluded from the formal economy, it also has implications for government revenue, economic statistics, and social protections for workers involved in these activities.
Unilinear evolutionary theory is a now largely outdated theory of social change that was prominent in nineteenth-century anthropology and sociology, which posited that all societies follow the same single, linear path of development through a fixed and predetermined sequence of successive stages of evolution, inevitably progressing from simple, so-called "primitive" forms to more complex, "advanced," and "civilised" stages, often with Western industrialised societies seen as the pinnacle of this evolutionary process. This theory suggested that different societies were simply at different points along this universal evolutionary trajectory. Unilinear evolutionary theories have been widely criticised for their ethnocentric biases, their lack of empirical support, and their failure to account for the diversity of historical and cultural development across different societies, often imposing a Western-centric view of progress onto other cultures. Contemporary sociological perspectives on social change, such as multilinear evolutionary theory, recognise that societies can change in various ways and follow diverse paths of development, influenced by their unique historical, cultural, and environmental contexts, without necessarily converging on a single end point.
The upper class is a social class broadly composed of the most affluent members of society, who typically possess significant wealth, often inherited across generations, and may own large businesses or hold substantial numbers of stocks and shares, wielding considerable economic and social influence. Membership in the upper class is often associated with high social status, exclusive social networks, and a lifestyle characterised by luxury and privilege. While income can be a factor, upper-class status is often more closely tied to the ownership of assets and the perpetuation of wealth over time, distinguishing it from other affluent individuals who may have high incomes but less accumulated wealth or inherited privilege. This class often plays a significant role in shaping economic and political landscapes due to its control over resources and its influence within elite circles.
Urban ecology is a subfield within sociology that focuses on the study of the intricate link and dynamic interrelationships between the physical and social dimensions of cities, examining how the spatial organisation, physical environment, and material infrastructure of urban areas shape social life, human behaviour, and community dynamics, and vice versa. It explores topics such as the distribution of populations, resources, and social problems within urban spaces, the impact of urban design and planning on social interactions, the relationship between urban environments and human health, and the processes of urban growth, change, and sustainability. Drawing on ecological principles, urban ecology views the city as a complex ecosystem where social and physical factors are interdependent and constantly interacting to shape the urban experience.
Urban renewal is a comprehensive process aimed at reviving and revitalizing deteriorating neighborhoods and urban areas that may be experiencing decline, disinvestment, or social problems. It typically involves a range of strategies, such as recycling underutilised land and existing buildings for new purposes, improving the physical environment through infrastructure upgrades and beautification projects, implementing better management practices for local areas with the active participation of local citizens, and strategically using public funds to stimulate regeneration and attract further private investment. The goals of urban renewal often include enhancing the quality of life for residents, fostering economic development, improving housing conditions, and creating more vibrant and sustainable urban communities. However, urban renewal projects can sometimes lead to unintended consequences such as gentrification and the displacement of existing low-income residents, making community engagement and equitable planning crucial aspects of the process.
Urbanisation refers to the process of the development of towns and cities, typically involving the growth in the size and population of urban areas and the increasing concentration of people living and working in these areas. This process is often linked to economic development, industrialisation, and the migration of people from rural to urban areas in search of opportunities. Urbanisation leads to significant transformations in land use, infrastructure development, social organisation, and lifestyles, creating complex urban environments that serve as centers of economic, political, and cultural activity. The study of urbanisation examines its causes, patterns, and consequences for societies, including issues related to urban planning, housing, transportation, social inequality, and environmental sustainability.
Urbanisation Processes refers to the dynamic and multifaceted changes involved in the growth and development of cities and urban areas, typically marked by the increasing concentration of populations in urban settings and the transformation of rural landscapes into urban ones. This category encompasses the historical evolution of cities (e.g., from preindustrial cities to industrial and postindustrial cities), the spatial organisation of urban areas (e.g., concentric-zone theory, multiple-nuclei theory), and the social and environmental consequences of urban growth (e.g., urban ecology, urban renewal, gentrification, defended neighborhoods, squatter settlements, suburbanisation). It also includes the study of urbanism (distinctive characteristics of urban social life), the development of new urban sociological perspectives, and the challenges related to urban planning, infrastructure, and social inequalities within metropolitan areas and vast urban regions (e.g., megalopolis). Understanding these processes is crucial for analysing the complexities of urban life and the ongoing societal shifts driven by population concentration.
Urbanism is a term used by sociologist Louis Wirth to denote the distinctive characteristics of social life that emerge in urban settings, particularly in large, densely populated cities, such as a greater degree of impersonality, anonymity, social heterogeneity, and a more complex division of labor compared to rural areas. Wirth argued that the size, density, and heterogeneity of urban populations shape the nature of social interactions and the social psychology of city dwellers, often leading to more formal and instrumental relationships, increased social tolerance for diversity, and a greater sense of individual freedom alongside potential feelings of social isolation or alienation. The study of urbanism explores how these unique social patterns and experiences in cities differ from those in more rural or traditional communities.
Validity in research refers to the extent to which a measurement instrument, test, or research study accurately measures precisely what it is intended to measure, ensuring that the findings genuinely represent the phenomenon or concept being investigated. It addresses the question of whether the research is actually capturing the truth about what is being studied. Different types of validity are important in research, including internal validity (the extent to which the study establishes a trustworthy cause-and-effect relationship between variables), external validity (the extent to which the findings can be generalised to other populations, settings, or times), construct validity (the degree to which a measure assesses the theoretical construct it is supposed to measure), and content validity (the extent to which a measure adequately covers all aspects of the construct of interest). Ensuring validity is crucial for the credibility and meaningfulness of research findings.
Value are culturally defined standards or principles that are widely shared by members of a society or group and serve as broad guidelines for social living, indicating what people assess as desirable, good, beautiful, right, or important. Value provide a moral compass for behaviour, influencing people's attitudes, choices, and actions across various aspects of life, and they often form the basis for social norms, which are more specific rules and expectations for behaviour. Value can vary significantly across different cultures and can change over time within a society, reflecting evolving beliefs and priorities. They play a crucial role in shaping social cohesion, cultural identity, and the overall character of a society, and they are often transmitted from one generation to the next through the process of socialisation.
Value neutrality, a concept emphasised by Max Weber, refers to the principle that sociologists, when interpreting data and conducting research, should strive for objectivity and avoid allowing their personal values, beliefs, or biases to unduly influence their analysis or conclusions. While Weber acknowledged that sociologists, like all individuals, have their own values, he argued that it is essential for researchers to maintain a stance of neutrality and impartiality during the scientific process of studying society, focusing on the empirical evidence and logical reasoning rather than personal preferences or moral judgments. This principle aims to enhance the rigor and credibility of sociological research by minimizing the potential for subjective biases to distort the understanding of social phenomena.
A variable is a concept or characteristic whose value or attribute changes or varies from one case to another, or across different individuals, groups, situations, or over time. It is a dimension along which an object, individual, or group can be categorised or measured, allowing for specific comparisons to be made with others or across different points in time. Examples of variables in sociological research include income level (which can vary from person to person), age (which changes over time for an individual), educational attainment (which differs among individuals), or social class (which can vary across groups or societies). Researchers examine the relationships between different variables to understand social phenomena, test hypotheses, and develop sociological theories. Variables can be independent (the presumed cause) or dependent (the presumed effect) in a causal relationship.
Vertical mobility refers to the movement of an individual or a group up or down the hierarchy of positions within a society's social stratification system. This movement signifies a change in social class, status, or power relative to one's previous position or the position of one's family of origin. Upward mobility involves moving to a higher social stratum, often characterised by increased wealth, income, occupational prestige, or social status. Examples include obtaining a higher-paying job, achieving a higher level of education, or marrying into a wealthier family. Downward mobility, on the other hand, involves moving to a lower social stratum, which might occur due to job loss, business failure, or a decline in health or economic circumstances. Vertical mobility is a key aspect of social stratification and is often studied to understand the openness and fluidity of a society's social structure.
Vested interests, a term used by economist and sociologist Thorstein Veblen, refer to those specific individuals, groups, or institutions within a society who have a significant stake in maintaining the existing social, economic, or political status quo and who stand to suffer a loss or disadvantage in the event of substantial social change that might threaten their current privileges, power, or resources. Because of their potential losses, those with vested interests often actively resist or oppose changes that could disrupt the established order from which they benefit, using their influence and resources to preserve their advantages and maintain the current distribution of power and wealth within society. Understanding vested interests is crucial for analysing why certain social changes face resistance and for comprehending the dynamics of power and social conflict within a society.
Victimisation, in sociology and criminology, refers to the process or experience of being a victim of crime, injustice, or other harmful social phenomena. This category encompasses various aspects related to the victim's perspective and their interactions with the criminal justice system and society. It includes the study of victimisation surveys, which collect data directly from individuals about their experiences as victims of crime, regardless of whether the crime was reported to the police. It also delves into the concept of victimless crimes, where there is no direct complainant, and examines the social and psychological impacts of being a victim of crime or other forms of harm, such as hate crimes, domestic violence, or discrimination. The study of victimisation also considers victimology, which is the scientific study of victims, and explores patterns of victimisation, risk factors, and the role of victims in the criminal justice process and in society's response to crime and harm.
Victimisation surveys are a type of research method used in criminology and sociology to gather data directly from individuals about their experiences as victims of crime, regardless of whether those crimes were reported to the police or other authorities. These surveys typically involve administering questionnaires or conducting interviews with a representative sample of the population, asking them about whether they have been victims of specific types of crimes over a particular period. Victimisation surveys can provide a more comprehensive picture of the extent of crime in a society, including the "dark figure of crime" (crimes that are not reported to law enforcement), and can offer valuable insights into the characteristics of victims, offenders, and the circumstances surrounding criminal events. They complement official crime statistics reported by police and can be used to assess trends in crime rates and the impact of crime on individuals and communities.
Victimless crimes, a term used by sociologists, refer to illegal activities or offenses that involve a willing exchange of goods or services among consenting adults where no direct victim is readily identifiable or comes forward to report a harm. These crimes often involve behaviours that are considered morally objectionable or against the law, but the individuals involved participate voluntarily and do not typically see themselves as victims. Examples of activities often categorised as victimless crimes include prostitution, illegal gambling, recreational drug use, and consensual homosexual acts (in jurisdictions where they are illegal). The debate around the legal status and societal response to victimless crimes often involves considerations of individual autonomy, morality, public health, and the role of government in regulating private behaviour.
Vital statistics are a crucial category of demographic data that consist of records of key life events within a population, such as the number of births, deaths, marriages, and divorces that occur within a specific geographic area and time period. These data are typically gathered through a registration system maintained by governmental units at the local, regional, or national level, and they provide essential information for understanding population trends, fertility rates, mortality rates, marriage and divorce patterns, and overall demographic changes within a society. Vital statistics are widely used by researchers, policymakers, and public health officials for various purposes, including population projections, assessing public health needs, and informing social and economic planning.
White-collar crime refers to a range of financially motivated nonviolent crimes that are typically committed by affluent individuals or corporations in the course of their daily business or professional activities, often involving deception, fraud, or breach of trust. These crimes can include offenses such as embezzlement, tax evasion, insider trading, securities fraud, corporate fraud, bribery, and environmental violations. Unlike street crimes that often involve physical violence or property damage, white-collar crimes typically involve financial manipulation and can result in significant economic losses to individuals, organisations, and society as a whole, as well as eroding public trust in institutions and markets. Despite often being less visible than other forms of crime, white-collar crime can have far-reaching and damaging consequences.
The working class is a social class broadly composed of people who are primarily involved in blue-collar or manual occupations, typically involving physical labor and often in industries such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, and agriculture. Membership in the working class is often defined by the type of work performed and may be associated with lower levels of formal education and income compared to the middle or upper classes. Historically, the working class has played a significant role in industrial societies, and their labor is essential for the production of goods and services. The term can also encompass those in lower-skilled service sector jobs. While the specific boundaries and characteristics of the working class can vary across different societies and over time, it generally refers to individuals and families who rely on wages or salaries from manual or less skilled labor for their primary source of income and who may have less economic security and social mobility compared to other social classes.
World-systems Theory, pioneered by sociologist Immanuel Wallerstein, is a macro-sociological theoretical framework that emphasises the interconnections and interdependence among countries based on the historical expansion and ongoing dynamics of a single, global capitalist world-economy. This theory posits that the world is not a collection of independent national economies but rather a complex, integrated system characterised by a hierarchical division of labor and power relations among three main categories of countries: core countries (dominant, wealthy, industrialised nations controlling global finance and high-profit production), semi-peripheral countries (intermediate, with some industrialisation but still dependent), and peripheral countries (less developed, exploited for raw materials and cheap labor). World-systems Theory analyses how this global structure shapes the economic development, social structures, and political dynamics of individual nations, perpetuating patterns of global inequality and dependence, and highlighting the historical roots of global disparities and the ongoing power dynamics that maintain them. It critiques modernisation theory for its nation-state focus.
World-systems theory, pioneered by sociologist Immanuel Wallerstein, is a macro-level perspective that emphasises the interconnections and interdependence among countries based on the historical expansion and current functioning of a global capitalist world economy. This theory posits that the world economy is not a collection of independent national economies but rather a single, integrated system characterised by a global division of labor and a hierarchical structure consisting of three main categories of countries: core countries, which are the wealthy, industrialised nations that dominate the global economy and control advanced technology and capital; semi-peripheral countries, which occupy an intermediate position, often supplying labor and raw materials to the core and serving as a buffer between the core and the periphery, with some level of industrialisation and potential for upward or downward mobility within the system; and peripheral countries, which have a marginal role in the world economy, often specializing in the production of raw materials and agricultural goods for the core, and are thus economically dependent on and often exploited by the core countries in unequal trading relationships. This theory highlights how the dynamics of the global capitalist system shape the economic development and social structures of nations within it, emphasizing historical processes of colonialism and neocolonialism in creating and maintaining global inequalities.
World systems analysis is a macro-sociological perspective developed by Immanuel Wallerstein that views the global economic system as an interconnected and hierarchical structure divided between certain industrialised, wealthy nations that control the majority of the world's wealth and resources (the core) and developing countries (the periphery) that are often controlled and exploited by the core for their labor and raw materials, with a third category of semi-peripheral countries occupying an intermediate position. This theory emphasises the historical development of a global capitalist economy and the ways in which the relationships between core, semi-peripheral, and peripheral countries are characterised by power imbalances and dependencies that perpetuate global inequalities. Wallerstein's approach highlights the interconnectedness of nations within this global system and how the dynamics of capitalism at a world scale shape the economic and social development of individual countries, arguing that the global system, rather than individual national factors alone, is the primary unit of analysis for understanding social change and inequality in the modern world.
Xenocentrism is a cultural attitude or belief characterised by the perception that the products, styles, ideas, technology, or other aspects of one's own society or culture are inherently inferior to those that originate in other societies or cultures, often leading to a preference for foreign things and a devaluation of one's own cultural heritage. This can manifest in various ways, such as a preference for foreign brands, a belief that foreign cultures are more advanced or sophisticated, or a tendency to adopt customs and practices from other societies while disregarding or criticizing one's own. Xenocentrism is essentially the opposite of ethnocentrism, which is the belief in the superiority of one's own culture. The phenomenon of xenocentrism can be influenced by factors such as globalisation, media exposure to other cultures, and historical or social contexts where one's own society may have experienced periods of hardship or perceived lack of progress compared to others.
Youth culture refers to the specific cultural attributes, norms, values, practices, styles, and forms of expression exhibited by many young people within a particular period or society, often characterised by a sense of shared identity, interests, and experiences that are distinct from those of other age groups, particularly adults. Youth culture can manifest in various aspects of life, including behavioural norms, dress codes, language use (such as slang), musical preferences, leisure activities, and attitudes towards social issues, many of which tend to differ from the prevailing adult culture of the time and may even represent a form of rebellion or a search for autonomy and identity formation during the transitional period of adolescence and young adulthood. Youth cultures are dynamic and can change rapidly, often influenced by popular media, technology, and social trends, and they can play a significant role in shaping broader cultural landscapes and driving social change.
Gross domestic product (GDP) is the total monetary or market value of all the finished goods and services produced within a country's borders in a specific time period, usually one year, regardless of who owns the factors of production. It is a comprehensive measure of a country's economic activity and is widely used as an indicator of its economic health and growth. GDP includes all private and public consumption, government outlays, investments, and exports minus imports that occur within the defined territory. It provides a snapshot of the total economic output of a nation and is often used to compare the size and performance of different economies. While GDP is a key economic indicator, it has limitations as a measure of overall societal well-being, as it does not account for factors such as income distribution, environmental quality, or non-market activities.
A new religious movement (NRM), sometimes still referred to as a cult, is a generally small, often recently emerged religious group that represents either a new religion or a major innovation of an existing faith, often holding beliefs and practices that differ significantly from mainstream religions and may be viewed as unconventional or outside the dominant religious traditions of a society. The term "cult" has acquired negative connotations and is often used pejoratively, so sociologists generally prefer the more neutral term NRM to avoid judgmental labeling. NRMs can vary widely in their size, structure, doctrines, and level of social acceptance, and they often attract followers who are seeking alternative spiritual paths or solutions to personal or societal problems. The study of NRMs in sociology examines their origins, development, social dynamics, and their relationships with the wider society.
A political action committee (PAC) is a political committee that is typically established by an interest group—such as a national bank, corporation, trade association, cooperative, or membership association—for the specific purpose of soliciting and distributing financial contributions to candidates running for political office or to political parties. PACs are a significant part of the campaign finance system in many democracies, allowing organised groups to pool resources and support candidates who align with their interests and policy objectives. The regulations governing PACs, including the amount of money they can raise and contribute, vary depending on the jurisdiction.
The total fertility rate (TFR) is a key demographic indicator that represents the average number of children that would be born alive to a woman over her lifetime if she were to experience the exact current age-specific fertility rates (births per woman at each age) through all her childbearing years (typically considered to be from age 15 to 49), and if she were to survive from birth to the end of her reproductive life. It is a hypothetical measure that provides an estimate of the average family size in a population based on current trends in fertility. A TFR of around 2.1 children per woman is generally considered the replacement level, which is the average number of children needed to replace the parents and maintain a stable population size in the long run, assuming no migration. TFRs vary significantly across different countries and regions due to a variety of social, economic, cultural, and health-related factors.
Zero population growth (ZPG) is a demographic state where a population's size remains stable with no net increase or decrease over time, achieved when the number of births plus the number of immigrants entering the population is exactly equal to the number of deaths plus the number of emigrants leaving the population. In other words, the rate of natural increase (births minus deaths) is offset by the rate of net migration (immigrants minus emigrants), resulting in an overall population growth rate of zero. Achieving ZPG can have various implications for a society, such as a more balanced age structure and potentially reduced pressure on natural resources and the environment, but it can also present challenges related to an aging workforce and potential economic impacts.
The achieved_Status_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Systems and Social Mobility' Causal relation: {Education, Achieved_Status} → influencesHistorically → {Social_Mobility, Class_Consciousness} Semantical explanation of achieved_Status_ID000001: Achieved status refers to a social position that a person attains largely through their own efforts, skills, abilities, and choices. It is earned or chosen based on merit and reflects personal accomplishments. Examples include becoming an Olympic medalist, a college graduate, a technical professional, or even a criminal. This is in contrast to ascribed status, which is assigned at birth or is beyond an individual's control, such as race or sex. Achieved status comes with associated rights, obligations, behaviours, and duties expected of those in that position, known as roles. While ideally based on merit, the ability to achieve certain statuses can be influenced by ascribed statuses and cultural capital. Achieved status plays a significant role in open societies where social mobility, the ability to move up or down the social hierarchy, is possible.
The adoption_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Family Formation Processes' Causal relation: {Nuclear_Family, Extended_Family} → adopts → {Adoption, Kinship} Semantical explanation of adoption_ID000001: Adoption is a legal process that allows for the permanent transfer of the legal rights, responsibilities, and privileges of parenthood to a new legal parent or parents from the biological or legal parents. Unlike guardianship, adoption is intended to create a permanent change in status, requiring societal recognition through legal or religious sanction. Historically, adoption practices often emphasised the adopter's political and economic interests, such as ensuring male heirs. However, modern adoption laws prioritise the child's welfare and development. Different types of adoption include foster care adoption, international adoption, and embryo adoption. Adoption is a complex process with emotional implications for adoptees, adoptive parents, and birth parents, often involving questions of identity and belonging. The evolution of adoption reflects changing societal values towards prioritizing the best interests of the child.
The affirmative_Action_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Civil Rights Advocacy' Causal relation: {Affirmative_Action, Political_Action_Committee_(PAC)} → advocates → {Minority_Group, Social_Movement} Semantical explanation of affirmative_Action_ID000001: Affirmative action refers to actions favouring those who tend to suffer from discrimination, representing positive efforts to recruit minority group members or women for jobs, promotions, and educational opportunities. It aims to increase the representation of groups historically excluded from areas like employment and education. Unlike equal opportunity, which is passive, affirmative action is proactive, involving measures to avert discrimination. Policies may include preferential selection and monitoring workforce composition. Originating in the 1960s, affirmative action seeks to remedy past and present discrimination and promote diversity. However, it has faced debate, with opponents arguing it constitutes reverse discrimination, while proponents emphasise its necessity for addressing ongoing inequalities and fostering inclusion. The legal landscape surrounding affirmative action is complex and has evolved over time.
The alienation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Bureaucratisation and Social Rationalisation' Causal relation: {Bureaucracy, Rationalisation} → bureaucratises → {Alienation, Formal_Organisation} Semantical explanation of alienation_ID000001: Alienation is the condition of being estranged or disassociated from the surrounding society. It involves a feeling of separation from one's milieu, work, the products of work, or self. The sense that our own abilities, as human beings, are taken over by other entities is also a key aspect. Sociologists like Marx described alienation in capitalist labor, where workers feel disconnected from their labor and its products. Durkheim focused on anomie, a state of normlessness leading to social alienation. Common variations of alienation include powerlessness, meaninglessness, normlessness, cultural estrangement, social isolation, and self-estrangement. Alienation is a recurring theme in sociological analysis of modern life and is often depicted in literature and popular culture as psychological isolation.
The anomie_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Anomie and Social Disorganisation' Causal relation: {Anomie, Collective_Behaviour} → influencesHistorically → {Deviance, Crime} Semantical explanation of anomie_ID000001: Anomie is a sociological concept, primarily associated with Emile Durkheim, that describes a state of normlessness or social disorganisation within a society or a social group. It occurs when there is a breakdown or absence of clear moral guidelines, social norms, and shared values, leading to a sense of confusion, disorientation, and lack of social regulation among individuals. Durkheim argued that rapid social change, such as industrialisation or economic crises, can disrupt traditional social bonds and norms, thereby contributing to anomie. When individuals experience anomie, they may feel disconnected from society, lack a sense of purpose, and be unsure of what behaviours are expected or appropriate. This state can lead to various negative consequences, including increased rates of deviance, crime, despair, and suicide, as individuals struggle to find meaning and direction in a deregulated social environment. Robert Merton later expanded on the concept, applying it to the strain individuals feel when culturally prescribed goals are not attainable through legitimate means.
The anticipatory_Socialisation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Anticipatory Socialisation and Status Preparation' Causal relation: {Anticipatory_Socialisation, Role_Taking} → socialises → {Status, Identity} Semantical explanation of anticipatory_Socialisation_ID000001: Anticipatory socialisation refers to the processes of socialisation in which a person "rehearses" for future positions, occupations, and social relationships. This involves learning the norms, values, and behaviours associated with a status or role that the individual expects to occupy in the future. By engaging in anticipatory socialisation, individuals can prepare themselves for the challenges and expectations of new roles, making the transition smoother when they eventually occupy those positions. Examples include teenagers who start dressing or behaving in ways they associate with adulthood, or students who take on internships to learn about a future profession. This process can help individuals develop the necessary skills and understanding to navigate new social environments and fulfill the requirements of future roles effectively. It plays a crucial role in facilitating social mobility and adaptation to changing life circumstances.
The apartheid_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Apartheid and Racial Segregation' Causal relation: {Apartheid, Racism} → segregates → {Racial_Group, Social_Exclusion} Semantical explanation of apartheid_ID000001: Apartheid was the former policy of the South African government designed to maintain the separation of Blacks and other non-Whites from the dominant Whites. This system of racial segregation and discrimination was implemented through legislation that classified people into racial groups and enforced their separation in all aspects of life, including housing, education, employment, healthcare, and political participation. The apartheid regime systematically privileged the White minority and subjected the Black majority to severe oppression and denial of basic human rights. This policy was in effect from 1948 to 1994 and drew widespread international condemnation, leading to various sanctions and boycotts against South Africa. The dismantling of apartheid began in the early 1990s with the release of Nelson Mandela and the subsequent reforms that led to multiracial elections and the establishment of a democratic government in South Africa. The legacy of apartheid continues to impact South African society, with ongoing efforts to address the deep-seated inequalities and social divisions created by this discriminatory system.
The apartheid_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Racial Spatial Segregation' Causal relation: {Apartheid, Institutional_Discrimination} → segregates → {Segregation, Defended_Neighborhood} Semantical explanation of apartheid_ID000002: Apartheid was the former policy of the South African government designed to maintain the separation of Blacks and other non-Whites from the dominant Whites. This system of racial segregation and discrimination was implemented through legislation that classified people into racial groups and enforced their separation in all aspects of life, including housing, education, employment, healthcare, and political participation. The apartheid regime systematically privileged the White minority and subjected the Black majority to severe oppression and denial of basic human rights. This policy was in effect from 1948 to 1994 and drew widespread international condemnation, leading to various sanctions and boycotts against South Africa. The dismantling of apartheid began in the early 1990s with the release of Nelson Mandela and the subsequent reforms that led to multiracial elections and the establishment of a democratic government in South Africa. The legacy of apartheid continues to impact South African society, with ongoing efforts to address the deep-seated inequalities and social divisions created by this discriminatory system.
The authority_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Authority and Social Legitimacy' Causal relation: {Authority, Legitimacy} → legitimises → {Power, Value} Semantical explanation of authority_ID000001: Authority is power that has been institutionalised and is recognised by the people over whom it is exercised. It is a form of legitimate power, meaning that those subject to it accept its rightfulness. Sociologist Max Weber identified three main types of authority: traditional authority, charismatic authority, and rational-legal authority. Traditional authority is based on long-established customs and traditions, often associated with hereditary leadership. Charismatic authority stems from the exceptional personal qualities or appeal of a leader, inspiring devotion and obedience. Rational-legal authority is based on formal rules, laws, and procedures, typically associated with bureaucratic systems and elected officials. The recognition and acceptance of authority are crucial for maintaining social order and stability within a society. When power is perceived as legitimate authority, it is more likely to be obeyed and less likely to be challenged.
The authority_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Authority Legitimises Power' Causal relation: {Authority} → legitimises → {Power} Semantical explanation of authority_ID000002: Authority is power that has been institutionalised and is recognised by the people over whom it is exercised. It is a form of legitimate power, meaning that those subject to it accept its rightfulness. Sociologist Max Weber identified three main types of authority: traditional authority, charismatic authority, and rational-legal authority. Traditional authority is based on long-established customs and traditions, often associated with hereditary leadership. Charismatic authority stems from the exceptional personal qualities or appeal of a leader, inspiring devotion and obedience. Rational-legal authority is based on formal rules, laws, and procedures, typically associated with bureaucratic systems and elected officials. The recognition and acceptance of authority are crucial for maintaining social order and stability within a society. When power is perceived as legitimate authority, it is more likely to be obeyed and less likely to be challenged.
The authority_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Patriarchal Authority Relations' Causal relation: {Patriarchy, Gender_Order} → subordinatedTo → {Authority, Gender_Role} Semantical explanation of authority_ID000003: Authority is power that has been institutionalised and is recognised by the people over whom it is exercised. It is a form of legitimate power, meaning that those subject to it accept its rightfulness. Sociologist Max Weber identified three main types of authority: traditional authority, charismatic authority, and rational-legal authority. Traditional authority is based on long-established customs and traditions, often associated with hereditary leadership. Charismatic authority stems from the exceptional personal qualities or appeal of a leader, inspiring devotion and obedience. Rational-legal authority is based on formal rules, laws, and procedures, typically associated with bureaucratic systems and elected officials. The recognition and acceptance of authority are crucial for maintaining social order and stability within a society. When power is perceived as legitimate authority, it is more likely to be obeyed and less likely to be challenged.
The authority_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Power and Political Control' Causal relation: {Power, Authority} → controls → {Government, Social_Control} Semantical explanation of authority_ID000004: Authority is power that has been institutionalised and is recognised by the people over whom it is exercised. It is a form of legitimate power, meaning that those subject to it accept its rightfulness. Sociologist Max Weber identified three main types of authority: traditional authority, charismatic authority, and rational-legal authority. Traditional authority is based on long-established customs and traditions, often associated with hereditary leadership. Charismatic authority stems from the exceptional personal qualities or appeal of a leader, inspiring devotion and obedience. Rational-legal authority is based on formal rules, laws, and procedures, typically associated with bureaucratic systems and elected officials. The recognition and acceptance of authority are crucial for maintaining social order and stability within a society. When power is perceived as legitimate authority, it is more likely to be obeyed and less likely to be challenged.
The biographical_Method_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Qualitative Research Interviewing' Causal relation: {Interview, Biographical_Method} → interviews → {Qualitative_Research, Life_History} Semantical explanation of biographical_Method_ID000001: Biographical methods involve research techniques that focus on collecting and analysing data related to individual lives or life experiences. These methods often include oral histories, where individuals recount their life stories in interviews; life stories, which are narrative accounts of a person's life, either told by themselves or others; autobiographies, which are self-written accounts of one's own life; and biographies, which are accounts of someone's life written by another person. Biographical methods aim to understand social phenomena from the perspective of individuals and to explore the meanings they attach to their experiences. They are particularly useful for studying life course transitions, personal narratives, and the impact of social and historical contexts on individual lives.
The biographical_Research_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Biographical Research Methods' Causal relation: {Biographical_Research, Life_History} → interviews → {Interview, Oral_History} Semantical explanation of biographical_Research_ID000001: Biographical research is a qualitative research approach that takes individual lives or life histories as its main focus of interest. It seeks to understand the social world through the detailed examination of personal experiences and the stories people tell about their lives. This type of research often involves in-depth interviews, analysis of personal documents (such as letters or diaries), and sometimes ethnographic observations to gain a rich and holistic understanding of the individual's life within their social context. Biographical research can provide valuable insights into social processes, cultural norms, and the ways individuals shape and are shaped by their social environments. It is used in various social science disciplines, including sociology, psychology, and anthropology, to explore topics such as identity formation, social change, and the impact of historical events on personal lives.
The bourgeoisie_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Capitalist Production and Class Formation' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Mass_Production, Industrialism} → stratifies → {Working_Class, Bourgeoisie, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of bourgeoisie_ID000001: Bourgeoisie, in the theory of Karl Marx, refers to the capitalist class, comprising the owners of the means of production, such as factories, land, and capital. In capitalist society, the bourgeoisie stands in opposition to the proletariat, or working class, who do not own the means of production and must sell their labor power to the bourgeoisie in order to survive.[1, 2] According to Marx, the bourgeoisie's primary goal is the accumulation of capital and profit, which they achieve through the exploitation of the proletariat. This class structure and the inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat are central to Marx's critique of capitalism.
The bourgeoisie_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Capitalist Property Relations and Market Structure' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Means_Of_Production} → economicallyRelatedTo → {Working_Class, Bourgeoisie} Semantical explanation of bourgeoisie_ID000002: Bourgeoisie, in the theory of Karl Marx, refers to the capitalist class, comprising the owners of the means of production, such as factories, land, and capital. In capitalist society, the bourgeoisie stands in opposition to the proletariat, or working class, who do not own the means of production and must sell their labor power to the bourgeoisie in order to survive.[1, 2] According to Marx, the bourgeoisie's primary goal is the accumulation of capital and profit, which they achieve through the exploitation of the proletariat. This class structure and the inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat are central to Marx's critique of capitalism.
The bourgeoisie_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Exploitation and Class Relations' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Means_Of_Production} → exploits → {Proletariat, Bourgeoisie} Semantical explanation of bourgeoisie_ID000003: Bourgeoisie, in the theory of Karl Marx, refers to the capitalist class, comprising the owners of the means of production, such as factories, land, and capital. In capitalist society, the bourgeoisie stands in opposition to the proletariat, or working class, who do not own the means of production and must sell their labor power to the bourgeoisie in order to survive.[1, 2] According to Marx, the bourgeoisie's primary goal is the accumulation of capital and profit, which they achieve through the exploitation of the proletariat. This class structure and the inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat are central to Marx's critique of capitalism.
The bourgeoisie_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Labor Exploitation' Causal relation: {Capitalist, Bourgeoisie} → exploits → {Surplus_Value, Proletariat} Semantical explanation of bourgeoisie_ID000004: Bourgeoisie, in the theory of Karl Marx, refers to the capitalist class, comprising the owners of the means of production, such as factories, land, and capital. In capitalist society, the bourgeoisie stands in opposition to the proletariat, or working class, who do not own the means of production and must sell their labor power to the bourgeoisie in order to survive.[1, 2] According to Marx, the bourgeoisie's primary goal is the accumulation of capital and profit, which they achieve through the exploitation of the proletariat. This class structure and the inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat are central to Marx's critique of capitalism.
The bourgeoisie_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Labor Organisation and Worker Protection' Causal relation: {Labour_Union, Trade_Union} → protests → {Capitalism, Bourgeoisie} Semantical explanation of bourgeoisie_ID000005: Bourgeoisie, in the theory of Karl Marx, refers to the capitalist class, comprising the owners of the means of production, such as factories, land, and capital. In capitalist society, the bourgeoisie stands in opposition to the proletariat, or working class, who do not own the means of production and must sell their labor power to the bourgeoisie in order to survive.[1, 2] According to Marx, the bourgeoisie's primary goal is the accumulation of capital and profit, which they achieve through the exploitation of the proletariat. This class structure and the inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat are central to Marx's critique of capitalism.
The bourgeoisie_ID000006 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Private Property Relations' Causal relation: {Capitalist, Bourgeoisie} → owns → {Means_Of_Production, Monopoly} Semantical explanation of bourgeoisie_ID000006: Bourgeoisie, in the theory of Karl Marx, refers to the capitalist class, comprising the owners of the means of production, such as factories, land, and capital. In capitalist society, the bourgeoisie stands in opposition to the proletariat, or working class, who do not own the means of production and must sell their labor power to the bourgeoisie in order to survive.[1, 2] According to Marx, the bourgeoisie's primary goal is the accumulation of capital and profit, which they achieve through the exploitation of the proletariat. This class structure and the inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat are central to Marx's critique of capitalism.
The bourgeoisie_ID000007 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Exclusion and Marginalisation' Causal relation: {Upper_Class, Bourgeoisie} → excludes → {Underclass, Minority_Group} Semantical explanation of bourgeoisie_ID000007: Bourgeoisie, in the theory of Karl Marx, refers to the capitalist class, comprising the owners of the means of production, such as factories, land, and capital. In capitalist society, the bourgeoisie stands in opposition to the proletariat, or working class, who do not own the means of production and must sell their labor power to the bourgeoisie in order to survive.[1, 2] According to Marx, the bourgeoisie's primary goal is the accumulation of capital and profit, which they achieve through the exploitation of the proletariat. This class structure and the inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat are central to Marx's critique of capitalism.
The bureaucracy_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Bureaucracy Coordinates Administration' Causal relation: {Bureaucracy} → coordinates → {Rationalisation} Semantical explanation of bureaucracy_ID000001: Bureaucracy is an organisation of a hierarchical sort, which takes the form of a pyramid of authority, with clear lines of command and responsibility. The term 'bureaucracy' was popularised by Max Weber, who considered it the most efficient type of large-scale human organisation in modern society. According to Weber, bureaucracy is characterised by a division of labor, a clearly defined hierarchy, formal rules and regulations, impersonality, and a focus on technical competence. As organisations grow in size and complexity, Weber argued, they inevitably tend to become more and more bureaucratised to manage their operations effectively.
The bureaucracy_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Bureaucratic Rationalisation' Causal relation: {Bureaucratisation, Rationalisation} → bureaucratises → {Bureaucracy, Formal_Organisation} Semantical explanation of bureaucracy_ID000002: Bureaucracy is an organisation of a hierarchical sort, which takes the form of a pyramid of authority, with clear lines of command and responsibility. The term 'bureaucracy' was popularised by Max Weber, who considered it the most efficient type of large-scale human organisation in modern society. According to Weber, bureaucracy is characterised by a division of labor, a clearly defined hierarchy, formal rules and regulations, impersonality, and a focus on technical competence. As organisations grow in size and complexity, Weber argued, they inevitably tend to become more and more bureaucratised to manage their operations effectively.
The bureaucracy_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Bureaucratisation and Social Rationalisation' Causal relation: {Bureaucracy, Rationalisation} → bureaucratises → {Alienation, Formal_Organisation} Semantical explanation of bureaucracy_ID000003: Bureaucracy is an organisation of a hierarchical sort, which takes the form of a pyramid of authority, with clear lines of command and responsibility. The term 'bureaucracy' was popularised by Max Weber, who considered it the most efficient type of large-scale human organisation in modern society. According to Weber, bureaucracy is characterised by a division of labor, a clearly defined hierarchy, formal rules and regulations, impersonality, and a focus on technical competence. As organisations grow in size and complexity, Weber argued, they inevitably tend to become more and more bureaucratised to manage their operations effectively.
The bureaucracy_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Labor Market Employment Relations' Causal relation: {Multinational_Corporation, Bureaucracy} → employs → {Working_Class, Proletariat} Semantical explanation of bureaucracy_ID000004: Bureaucracy is an organisation of a hierarchical sort, which takes the form of a pyramid of authority, with clear lines of command and responsibility. The term 'bureaucracy' was popularised by Max Weber, who considered it the most efficient type of large-scale human organisation in modern society. According to Weber, bureaucracy is characterised by a division of labor, a clearly defined hierarchy, formal rules and regulations, impersonality, and a focus on technical competence. As organisations grow in size and complexity, Weber argued, they inevitably tend to become more and more bureaucratised to manage their operations effectively.
The bureaucracy_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Organisational Coordination and Efficiency' Causal relation: {Organisation, Bureaucracy} → coordinates → {Structuration, Rationalisation} Semantical explanation of bureaucracy_ID000005: Bureaucracy is an organisation of a hierarchical sort, which takes the form of a pyramid of authority, with clear lines of command and responsibility. The term 'bureaucracy' was popularised by Max Weber, who considered it the most efficient type of large-scale human organisation in modern society. According to Weber, bureaucracy is characterised by a division of labor, a clearly defined hierarchy, formal rules and regulations, impersonality, and a focus on technical competence. As organisations grow in size and complexity, Weber argued, they inevitably tend to become more and more bureaucratised to manage their operations effectively.
The bureaucracy_ID000006 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Organisational Management Control' Causal relation: {Bureaucracy, Formal_Organisation} → manages → {Organisation, Invention} Semantical explanation of bureaucracy_ID000006: Bureaucracy is an organisation of a hierarchical sort, which takes the form of a pyramid of authority, with clear lines of command and responsibility. The term 'bureaucracy' was popularised by Max Weber, who considered it the most efficient type of large-scale human organisation in modern society. According to Weber, bureaucracy is characterised by a division of labor, a clearly defined hierarchy, formal rules and regulations, impersonality, and a focus on technical competence. As organisations grow in size and complexity, Weber argued, they inevitably tend to become more and more bureaucratised to manage their operations effectively.
The bureaucracy_ID000007 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Political Authority and Social Control' Causal relation: {Government, Bureaucracy} → governs → {Social_Control, Law} Semantical explanation of bureaucracy_ID000007: Bureaucracy is an organisation of a hierarchical sort, which takes the form of a pyramid of authority, with clear lines of command and responsibility. The term 'bureaucracy' was popularised by Max Weber, who considered it the most efficient type of large-scale human organisation in modern society. According to Weber, bureaucracy is characterised by a division of labor, a clearly defined hierarchy, formal rules and regulations, impersonality, and a focus on technical competence. As organisations grow in size and complexity, Weber argued, they inevitably tend to become more and more bureaucratised to manage their operations effectively.
The bureaucracy_ID000008 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Urban Planning and Spatial Organisation' Causal relation: {Government, Bureaucracy} → regulates → {Urbanism, Organisation} Semantical explanation of bureaucracy_ID000008: Bureaucracy is an organisation of a hierarchical sort, which takes the form of a pyramid of authority, with clear lines of command and responsibility. The term 'bureaucracy' was popularised by Max Weber, who considered it the most efficient type of large-scale human organisation in modern society. According to Weber, bureaucracy is characterised by a division of labor, a clearly defined hierarchy, formal rules and regulations, impersonality, and a focus on technical competence. As organisations grow in size and complexity, Weber argued, they inevitably tend to become more and more bureaucratised to manage their operations effectively.
The bureaucratisation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Bureaucratic Authority and Institutional Organisation' Causal relation: {Bureaucratisation, Legal-rational_Authority} → institutionalises → {Formal_Organisation, Law} Semantical explanation of bureaucratisation_ID000001: Bureaucratisation is the process by which a group, organisation, or social movement becomes increasingly bureaucratic in its structure and operation. This involves the adoption of the characteristics of a bureaucracy, such as hierarchical organisation, formal rules and procedures, specialisation of tasks, and impersonal relationships. Bureaucratisation often occurs as organisations grow and seek greater efficiency and standardisation in their activities. While it can lead to increased efficiency, it can also result in rigidity, red tape, and a decrease in flexibility and personal initiative.
The bureaucratisation_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Bureaucratic Rationalisation' Causal relation: {Bureaucratisation, Rationalisation} → bureaucratises → {Bureaucracy, Formal_Organisation} Semantical explanation of bureaucratisation_ID000002: Bureaucratisation is the process by which a group, organisation, or social movement becomes increasingly bureaucratic in its structure and operation. This involves the adoption of the characteristics of a bureaucracy, such as hierarchical organisation, formal rules and procedures, specialisation of tasks, and impersonal relationships. Bureaucratisation often occurs as organisations grow and seek greater efficiency and standardisation in their activities. While it can lead to increased efficiency, it can also result in rigidity, red tape, and a decrease in flexibility and personal initiative.
The capital_Punishment_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Criminal Justice Punishment' Causal relation: {Capital_Punishment, Formal_Social_Control} → sanctions → {Crime, Rehabilitation} Semantical explanation of capital_Punishment_ID000001: Capital punishment is the state-sanctioned execution of a person who has been convicted of a crime that is punishable by death. Commonly known as the 'death penalty', it is a highly debated topic with strong ethical, moral, and legal arguments both for and against its use. Proponents often argue for its effectiveness as a deterrent to crime and as a just retribution for heinous offenses, while opponents raise concerns about its irreversibility, potential for error, and moral implications, often citing issues of human rights and cruel and unusual punishment. The application of capital punishment varies significantly across countries and jurisdictions, with differing views on which crimes warrant such a severe penalty.
The capital_Punishment_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Rehabilitation and Social Reintegration' Causal relation: {Rehabilitation, Capital_Punishment} → influencesHistorically → {Crime, Social_Control} Semantical explanation of capital_Punishment_ID000002: Capital punishment is the state-sanctioned execution of a person who has been convicted of a crime that is punishable by death. Commonly known as the 'death penalty', it is a highly debated topic with strong ethical, moral, and legal arguments both for and against its use. Proponents often argue for its effectiveness as a deterrent to crime and as a just retribution for heinous offenses, while opponents raise concerns about its irreversibility, potential for error, and moral implications, often citing issues of human rights and cruel and unusual punishment. The application of capital punishment varies significantly across countries and jurisdictions, with differing views on which crimes warrant such a severe penalty.
The capitalism_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Capitalism Exploits Workers' Causal relation: {Capitalism} → exploits → {Proletariat} Semantical explanation of capitalism_ID000001: Capitalism is a system of economic enterprise based on market exchange, private ownership of the means of production, and the pursuit of profit. 'Capital' refers to any asset, including money, property, and machines, which can be used to produce commodities for sale or invested in a market with the hope of achieving a profit. Key features of capitalism include free markets, competition, wage labor, and the accumulation of capital. While it can drive innovation and economic growth, capitalism has also been criticised for its potential to create social inequalities and economic instability. Karl Marx argued that capitalism leads to alienation of workers from their labor and the products they produce.
The capitalism_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Capitalism Stratifies Society' Causal relation: {Capitalism} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification} Semantical explanation of capitalism_ID000002: Capitalism is a system of economic enterprise based on market exchange, private ownership of the means of production, and the pursuit of profit. 'Capital' refers to any asset, including money, property, and machines, which can be used to produce commodities for sale or invested in a market with the hope of achieving a profit. Key features of capitalism include free markets, competition, wage labor, and the accumulation of capital. While it can drive innovation and economic growth, capitalism has also been criticised for its potential to create social inequalities and economic instability. Karl Marx argued that capitalism leads to alienation of workers from their labor and the products they produce.
The capitalism_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Capitalist Labor Exploitation' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Mass_Production} → exploits → {Working_Class, Proletariat} Semantical explanation of capitalism_ID000003: Capitalism is a system of economic enterprise based on market exchange, private ownership of the means of production, and the pursuit of profit. 'Capital' refers to any asset, including money, property, and machines, which can be used to produce commodities for sale or invested in a market with the hope of achieving a profit. Key features of capitalism include free markets, competition, wage labor, and the accumulation of capital. While it can drive innovation and economic growth, capitalism has also been criticised for its potential to create social inequalities and economic instability. Karl Marx argued that capitalism leads to alienation of workers from their labor and the products they produce.
The capitalism_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Capitalist Production and Class Formation' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Mass_Production, Industrialism} → stratifies → {Working_Class, Bourgeoisie, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of capitalism_ID000004: Capitalism is a system of economic enterprise based on market exchange, private ownership of the means of production, and the pursuit of profit. 'Capital' refers to any asset, including money, property, and machines, which can be used to produce commodities for sale or invested in a market with the hope of achieving a profit. Key features of capitalism include free markets, competition, wage labor, and the accumulation of capital. While it can drive innovation and economic growth, capitalism has also been criticised for its potential to create social inequalities and economic instability. Karl Marx argued that capitalism leads to alienation of workers from their labor and the products they produce.
The capitalism_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Capitalist Property Relations and Market Structure' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Means_Of_Production} → economicallyRelatedTo → {Working_Class, Bourgeoisie} Semantical explanation of capitalism_ID000005: Capitalism is a system of economic enterprise based on market exchange, private ownership of the means of production, and the pursuit of profit. 'Capital' refers to any asset, including money, property, and machines, which can be used to produce commodities for sale or invested in a market with the hope of achieving a profit. Key features of capitalism include free markets, competition, wage labor, and the accumulation of capital. While it can drive innovation and economic growth, capitalism has also been criticised for its potential to create social inequalities and economic instability. Karl Marx argued that capitalism leads to alienation of workers from their labor and the products they produce.
The capitalism_ID000006 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Class Stratification' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Economic_System} → stratifies → {Social_Class, Social_Stratification} Semantical explanation of capitalism_ID000006: Capitalism is a system of economic enterprise based on market exchange, private ownership of the means of production, and the pursuit of profit. 'Capital' refers to any asset, including money, property, and machines, which can be used to produce commodities for sale or invested in a market with the hope of achieving a profit. Key features of capitalism include free markets, competition, wage labor, and the accumulation of capital. While it can drive innovation and economic growth, capitalism has also been criticised for its potential to create social inequalities and economic instability. Karl Marx argued that capitalism leads to alienation of workers from their labor and the products they produce.
The capitalism_ID000007 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Exploitation and Class Relations' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Means_Of_Production} → exploits → {Proletariat, Bourgeoisie} Semantical explanation of capitalism_ID000007: Capitalism is a system of economic enterprise based on market exchange, private ownership of the means of production, and the pursuit of profit. 'Capital' refers to any asset, including money, property, and machines, which can be used to produce commodities for sale or invested in a market with the hope of achieving a profit. Key features of capitalism include free markets, competition, wage labor, and the accumulation of capital. While it can drive innovation and economic growth, capitalism has also been criticised for its potential to create social inequalities and economic instability. Karl Marx argued that capitalism leads to alienation of workers from their labor and the products they produce.
The capitalism_ID000008 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Market Competition' Causal relation: {Multinational_Corporation, Capitalism} → competesWith → {Economy, Economic_Interdependence} Semantical explanation of capitalism_ID000008: Capitalism is a system of economic enterprise based on market exchange, private ownership of the means of production, and the pursuit of profit. 'Capital' refers to any asset, including money, property, and machines, which can be used to produce commodities for sale or invested in a market with the hope of achieving a profit. Key features of capitalism include free markets, competition, wage labor, and the accumulation of capital. While it can drive innovation and economic growth, capitalism has also been criticised for its potential to create social inequalities and economic instability. Karl Marx argued that capitalism leads to alienation of workers from their labor and the products they produce.
The capitalism_ID000009 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Systems and Social Stratification' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Class_System} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of capitalism_ID000009: Capitalism is a system of economic enterprise based on market exchange, private ownership of the means of production, and the pursuit of profit. 'Capital' refers to any asset, including money, property, and machines, which can be used to produce commodities for sale or invested in a market with the hope of achieving a profit. Key features of capitalism include free markets, competition, wage labor, and the accumulation of capital. While it can drive innovation and economic growth, capitalism has also been criticised for its potential to create social inequalities and economic instability. Karl Marx argued that capitalism leads to alienation of workers from their labor and the products they produce.
The capitalism_ID000010 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Labor Organisation and Worker Protection' Causal relation: {Labour_Union, Trade_Union} → protests → {Capitalism, Bourgeoisie} Semantical explanation of capitalism_ID000010: Capitalism is a system of economic enterprise based on market exchange, private ownership of the means of production, and the pursuit of profit. 'Capital' refers to any asset, including money, property, and machines, which can be used to produce commodities for sale or invested in a market with the hope of achieving a profit. Key features of capitalism include free markets, competition, wage labor, and the accumulation of capital. While it can drive innovation and economic growth, capitalism has also been criticised for its potential to create social inequalities and economic instability. Karl Marx argued that capitalism leads to alienation of workers from their labor and the products they produce.
The capitalism_ID000011 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Market Economic Control' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Economy} → controls → {Economic_System, Laissez-faire} Semantical explanation of capitalism_ID000011: Capitalism is a system of economic enterprise based on market exchange, private ownership of the means of production, and the pursuit of profit. 'Capital' refers to any asset, including money, property, and machines, which can be used to produce commodities for sale or invested in a market with the hope of achieving a profit. Key features of capitalism include free markets, competition, wage labor, and the accumulation of capital. While it can drive innovation and economic growth, capitalism has also been criticised for its potential to create social inequalities and economic instability. Karl Marx argued that capitalism leads to alienation of workers from their labor and the products they produce.
The capitalist_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Labor Exploitation' Causal relation: {Capitalist, Bourgeoisie} → exploits → {Surplus_Value, Proletariat} Semantical explanation of capitalist_ID000001: Capitalist are those who own companies, land, or stocks and shares, using these assets to generate economic returns or profits through investment and production. In a capitalist system, capitalists control the means of production and employ workers to produce goods and services, aiming to maximise their profits. They play a central role in the economy by investing capital and taking risks in the pursuit of economic growth. The relationship between capitalists and workers is often characterised by an imbalance of power, as capitalists own the resources necessary for production and workers depend on them for employment and wages.
The capitalist_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Private Property Relations' Causal relation: {Capitalist, Bourgeoisie} → owns → {Means_Of_Production, Monopoly} Semantical explanation of capitalist_ID000002: Capitalist are those who own companies, land, or stocks and shares, using these assets to generate economic returns or profits through investment and production. In a capitalist system, capitalists control the means of production and employ workers to produce goods and services, aiming to maximise their profits. They play a central role in the economy by investing capital and taking risks in the pursuit of economic growth. The relationship between capitalists and workers is often characterised by an imbalance of power, as capitalists own the resources necessary for production and workers depend on them for employment and wages.
The 'causal_Event_ID000001' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Anomie and Social Disorganisation' This relation examines how anomie conditions and collective behaviour processes collectively produce deviant behaviour and various social problems. The relationship reflects Durkheim's and Merton's theories on how weakened social integration and blocked opportunity structures create environments conducive to norm violation and antisocial behaviour through reduced social control and alternative goal achievement mechanisms. Formal notation: {Anomie, Collective_Behaviour} → influencesHistorically → {Deviance, Crime} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000002' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Anticipatory Socialisation and Status Preparation' This relation examines how anticipatory socialisation processes prepare individuals for future status transitions and role development. The relationship captures how people learn expected behaviours, values, and skills for roles they hope to occupy, demonstrating how socialisation extends beyond current positions to include preparation for upward mobility through observation and practice of desired social positions. Formal notation: {Anticipatory_Socialisation, Role_Taking} → socialises → {Status, Identity} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000003' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Apartheid and Racial Segregation' This relation models how apartheid systems and racist ideologies work together to enforce racial segregation and social exclusion. The relationship demonstrates how institutionalised racism creates systematic barriers for racial groups through legal, spatial, and economic mechanisms that prevent integration and maintain white supremacy through both formal policies and informal social practices. Formal notation: {Apartheid, Racism} → segregates → {Racial_Group, Social_Exclusion} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000004' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Authority Legitimation Processes' This relation captures how social institutions and cultural systems provide justification and acceptance for power relationships through formal mechanisms that make dominance appear natural, rational, or morally justified. Formal notation: {Legal-rational_Authority, Traditional_Authority} → regulates → {Legitimacy, Power} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000005' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Authority Legitimises Power' This relation examines how legitimate authority legitimises the exercise of social power. Formal notation: {Authority} → legitimises → {Power} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000006' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Authority and Social Legitimacy' This relation examines how different forms of authority gain and maintain social legitimacy. The relationship demonstrates how traditional authority, charismatic authority, and legal-rational authority interact with social norms and values to create legitimate power structures that are accepted by society. Formal notation: {Authority, Legitimacy} → legitimises → {Power, Value} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000007' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Automation and Labor Displacement' This relation models how automation processes and technological innovation collectively impact traditional employment and economic organisation. The relationship examines how machine technology and industrial automation eliminate routine jobs while creating demand for new technical skills, potentially generating technological unemployment and increased economic inequality through technological displacement. Formal notation: {Innovation, Internet} → automates → {Economy, Working_Class} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000008' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Biographical Research Methods' This relation represents in-depth data collection through structured conversations that capture individual life experiences, personal narratives, and subjective meanings for qualitative sociological analysis. Formal notation: {Biographical_Research, Life_History} → interviews → {Interview, Oral_History} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000009' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Bureaucracy Coordinates Administration' This relation examines how bureaucratic systems coordinate administrative activities and maintain efficiency. Formal notation: {Bureaucracy} → coordinates → {Rationalisation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000010' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Bureaucratic Authority and Institutional Organisation' This relation analyses how bureaucratisation processes and legal-rational authority systems work together to institutionalise formal organisations and rule of law principles. The relationship reflects Weber's analysis of modern rationalisation, demonstrating how bureaucratic structures create predictable, efficient administration while establishing legal frameworks that constrain arbitrary power through procedural rules. Formal notation: {Bureaucratisation, Legal-rational_Authority} → institutionalises → {Formal_Organisation, Law} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000011' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Bureaucratic Rationalisation' This relation captures Weber's concept of increasing emphasis on efficiency, calculability, and formal rules in modern organisations and societies, leading to systematic administrative control. Formal notation: {Bureaucratisation, Rationalisation} → bureaucratises → {Bureaucracy, Formal_Organisation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000012' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Bureaucratisation and Social Rationalisation' This relation examines how bureaucratisation processes rationalise social organisation and create efficient but impersonal social systems. The relationship demonstrates how formal organisation, rationalisation, and efficiency demands interact to produce bureaucratic structures that may enhance productivity but also create alienation and social distance. Formal notation: {Bureaucracy, Rationalisation} → bureaucratises → {Alienation, Formal_Organisation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000013' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Capitalism Exploits Workers' This relation examines how capitalist systems exploit working class labor for profit. Formal notation: {Capitalism} → exploits → {Proletariat} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000014' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Capitalism Stratifies Society' This relation examines how capitalist economic systems create social stratification and class divisions. Formal notation: {Capitalism} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000015' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Capitalist Labor Exploitation' This relation captures the extraction of surplus value from workers' labor by capital owners, representing the fundamental class relationship in capitalist systems where workers receive less compensation than the value they create. Formal notation: {Capitalism, Mass_Production} → exploits → {Working_Class, Proletariat} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000016' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Capitalist Production and Class Formation' This relation examines how capitalist economic systems, mass production methods, and industrial organisation collectively generate distinct social classes. The relationship reflects Marx's analysis of how production relations create structural divisions between capital owners (bourgeoisie) and wage laborers (working class), while simultaneously producing systematic social inequality through differential access to resources and power. Formal notation: {Capitalism, Mass_Production, Industrialism} → stratifies → {Working_Class, Bourgeoisie, Social_Inequality} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000017' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Capitalist Property Relations and Market Structure' This relation examines how capitalist economic systems and private ownership institutions collectively structure labor markets and class relationships. The relationship reflects Marxist analysis of how property ownership creates fundamental divisions between capital and labor while generating competitive markets that prioritise profit maximisation over worker welfare and social needs through market mechanisms. Formal notation: {Capitalism, Means_Of_Production} → economicallyRelatedTo → {Working_Class, Bourgeoisie} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000018' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Civil Rights Advocacy' This relation captures organised efforts to promote equal rights and social justice for marginalised groups through legal challenges, political lobbying, and public awareness campaigns. Formal notation: {Affirmative_Action, Political_Action_Committee_(PAC)} → advocates → {Minority_Group, Social_Movement} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000019' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Collective Political Resistance' This relation captures organised expressions of dissent and demands for social change through public demonstrations, strikes, and other forms of collective action challenging existing power structures. Formal notation: {Social_Movement, Labour_Union} → protests → {Politics, Social_Change} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000020' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Colonial Economic Extraction' This relation captures the systematic appropriation of resources, labor, and wealth from colonised territories by imperial powers, establishing global patterns of economic dependency and underdevelopment. Formal notation: {Colonialism, Neo-colonialism} → exploits → {Exploitation_Theory, Underdevelopment} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000021' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Community Mobilisation and Local Development' This relation examines how group mobilisation enables local development and social improvement. The relationship demonstrates how community organisations, local leadership, and collective action interact to mobilise community resources for local development and social change. Formal notation: {Group, Social_Mobility} → mobilises → {Social_Change, Social_Structure} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000022' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Corporate Crime and Organisational Deviance' This relation models how white-collar crime patterns and corporate cultural factors together enable organisational wrongdoing and economic harm. The relationship examines how organisational structures, competitive pressures, and weak oversight create environments conducive to corporate wrongdoing while demonstrating how elite deviance often receives lenient treatment compared to street crime. Formal notation: {White-collar_Crime, Corporate_Crime} → influencesHistorically → {Economic_System, Social_Inequality} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000023' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Corporate Labor Exploitation' This relation captures how multinational corporations extract surplus value from workers globally through wage suppression, unsafe working conditions, and resistance to labor organisation. Formal notation: {Multinational_Corporation, Sweatshop} → exploits → {Exploitation_Theory, Working_Class} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000024' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Corporate Power and Economic Concentration' This relation models how multinational corporations and monopoly power collectively influence economic development and market dynamics. The relationship examines how capital concentration creates uneven development across geographic areas while concentrating wealth in corporate centers and generating economic dependencies that reshape local economies and social structures through corporate dominance. Formal notation: {Multinational_Corporation, Monopoly} → controls → {Economic_System, Social_Inequality} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000025' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Criminal Justice Punishment' This relation represents the application of negative consequences by legal institutions to deter crime and maintain social order through formal punishment mechanisms including incarceration and capital punishment. Formal notation: {Capital_Punishment, Formal_Social_Control} → sanctions → {Crime, Rehabilitation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000026' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Diffusion and Social Innovation' This relation models how cultural diffusion spreads innovations and creates social change. The relationship examines how cultural exchange, communication networks, and social interaction interact to spread new ideas, practices, and technologies across social groups and geographic regions. Formal notation: {Diffusion, Cultural_Capital} → hasInfluence → {Innovation, Social_Change} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000027' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Hegemony Establishment' This relation models how dominant groups maintain power through cultural leadership and ideological influence, shaping common sense and worldviews to support existing power structures. Formal notation: {Hegemony, Power_Elite} → controls → {Culture, Mass_Media} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000028' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Influence and Identity Formation' This relation examines how cultural influence shapes individual and group identity formation. The relationship demonstrates how cultural values, social norms, and group membership interact to influence how individuals and groups form their identities and understand themselves. Formal notation: {Culture, Value} → hasInfluence → {Identity, Social_Role} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000029' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Influence and Social Change' This relation models how cultural elements influence social change and shape social development. The relationship examines how cultural values, beliefs, and practices interact with social institutions to promote or resist social change, creating dynamic relationships between culture and social structure. Formal notation: {Culture, Value} → hasInfluence → {Social_Change, Social_Structure} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000030' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Reproduction and Social Inequality' This relation models how cultural reproduction mechanisms maintain and perpetuate social inequality across generations. The relationship examines how education, family background, and cultural capital interact to reproduce class positions, ensuring that social advantages and disadvantages are transmitted from parents to children. Formal notation: {Cultural_Capital, Family} → reproduces → {Social_Class, Social_Mobility} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000031' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Transmission Processes' This relation captures the mechanisms through which cultural knowledge, practices, traditions, and symbolic systems are passed between generations and across social groups, maintaining cultural continuity while enabling cultural change. Formal notation: {Cultural_Transmission, Education} → transmits → {Culture, Cultural_Capital} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000032' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Culture Influences Behaviour' This relation models how cultural values and norms influence individual and group behaviour. Formal notation: {Culture} → hasInfluence → {Social_Change} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000033' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Deindustrialisation and Urban Decline' This relation models how deindustrialisation processes and economic restructuring collectively impact working-class communities and urban areas. The relationship examines how the decline of manufacturing industries devastates working-class communities, creating unemployment concentrations and population loss in formerly prosperous industrial cities through economic transformation and capital flight. Formal notation: {Deindustrialisation, Economic_System} → influencesHistorically → {Working_Class, Relative_Deprivation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000034' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Democracy and Civic Participation' This relation examines how democratic institutions work together to enable political participation and social movement formation. The relationship reflects theories of democratic governance that emphasise how institutional frameworks create opportunities for citizen involvement while fostering social capital and collective action capabilities through participatory mechanisms and civil liberties protection. Formal notation: {Democracy, Politics} → influencesHistorically → {Social_Movement, Collective_Behaviour} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000035' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Democratic Political Governance' This relation captures the exercise of political authority through democratic institutions involving citizen participation, representation, and accountability mechanisms in policy-making and administration. Formal notation: {Democracy, Representative_Democracy} → governs → {Political_System, Nation_State} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000036' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Democratic Political Participation' This relation models citizen engagement in political processes through voting, advocacy, and civic involvement that legitimises democratic governance while potentially reproducing existing power structures. Formal notation: {Democracy, Liberal_Democracy} → participatesIn → {Politics, Representative_Democracy} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000037' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Deviance Marginalises Individuals' This relation models how deviant behaviour leads to social marginalisation and exclusion. Formal notation: {Deviance} → marginalises → {Social_Exclusion} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000038' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Diffusion Influences Innovation' This relation models how cultural diffusion spreads innovations across social groups and regions. Formal notation: {Diffusion} → hasInfluence → {Innovation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000039' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Digital Communication and Social Transformation' This relation examines how Internet technologies and digital communication systems collectively transform social interaction patterns and virtual community formation. The relationship captures how digital technologies reshape social relationships through online platforms while creating new forms of social capital and community organisation that transcend geographic boundaries through technological mediation. Formal notation: {Internet, Cyberspace} → digitalises → {Social_Interaction, Social_Cohesion} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000040' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Digital Divide and Information Inequality' This relation models how internet access, technological infrastructure and relative poverty collectively create information inequality and new forms of social stratification. The relationship examines how unequal access to digital technologies reproduces existing inequalities while creating new disadvantages for those lacking technological access in increasingly digital societies through differential technological participation. Formal notation: {Internet, Relative_Poverty} → stratifies → {Social_Inequality, Education} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000041' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Digital Technology Social Transformation' This relation models how digital technologies transform social interaction, economic organisation, and cultural practices through virtual communication, automation, and information processing capabilities. Formal notation: {Internet, E-commerce} → digitalises → {Social_Change, Cyberspace} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000042' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Discrimination Processes and Social Marginalisation' This relation models how various forms of discrimination, spatial segregation practices, and institutional bias work together to systematically marginalise ethnic and minority groups. The relationship captures the intersecting mechanisms through which dominant groups maintain advantage by limiting minority access to resources, opportunities, and full social participation through both formal and informal exclusionary practices. Formal notation: {Discrimination, Segregation, Institutional_Discrimination} → marginalises → {Minority_Group} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000043' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Economic Class Stratification' This relation represents the systematic hierarchical organisation of society based on differential access to economic resources, creating distinct social classes with varying levels of power, prestige, and life chances. Formal notation: {Capitalism, Economic_System} → stratifies → {Social_Class, Social_Stratification} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000044' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Economic Coordination and Market Systems' This relation models how economic coordination enables market systems to function and allocate resources. The relationship demonstrates how market mechanisms, economic institutions, and social norms interact to coordinate economic activity and distribute goods and services in society. Formal notation: {Economic_System} → coordinates → {Economy, Economic_Interdependence} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000045' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Economic Exploitation and Class Relations' This relation examines how economic exploitation creates and maintains class relations in capitalist societies. The relationship demonstrates how the means of production, surplus value, and class consciousness interact to produce exploitative relationships between capitalists and workers, generating class conflict and social inequality. Formal notation: {Capitalism, Means_Of_Production} → exploits → {Proletariat, Bourgeoisie} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000046' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Economic Inequality and Migration' This relation examines how economic inequality and outsourcing practices together produce large-scale population migration. The relationship captures how global economic integration creates winners and losers, reshaping labor markets and social structures while generating new forms of spatial and economic stratification that drive population movements seeking economic opportunities. Formal notation: {Economic_System, Outsourcing} → causallyInfluencedBy → {Migration, Social_Inequality} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000047' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Economic Integration and Labor Migration' This relation models how economic systems and trade relationships work together to facilitate labor migration and cultural exchange. The relationship examines how economic liberalisation creates integrated markets while generating population movements and cultural mixing that reshape local communities and national economies through increased economic interdependence. Formal notation: {Economic_System, Economic_Interdependence} → influencesHistorically → {Migration, Cultural_Diversity} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000048' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Economic Labor Exploitation' This relation captures the extraction of surplus value from workers' labor by capital owners, representing the fundamental class relationship in capitalist systems where workers receive less compensation than the value they create. Formal notation: {Capitalist, Bourgeoisie} → exploits → {Surplus_Value, Proletariat} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000049' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Economic Marginalisation Process' This relation represents systematic exclusion of populations from mainstream economic opportunities, pushing them toward informal economies, precarious employment, or economic dependence. Formal notation: {Neoliberalism, Deindustrialisation} → marginalises → {Underground_Economy, Underclass} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000050' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Economic Market Competition' This relation models rivalry between economic actors for scarce resources, market share, or competitive advantage within capitalist systems, driving innovation while potentially increasing inequality. Formal notation: {Multinational_Corporation, Capitalism} → competesWith → {Economy, Economic_Interdependence} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000051' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Economic Market Control' This relation models how powerful economic actors manipulate market conditions, prices, and competition to maintain advantageous positions and maximise profits at others' expense. Formal notation: {Monopoly, Multinational_Corporation} → controls → {Economy, Economic_System} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000052' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Economic System Coordinates Production' This relation models how economic systems coordinate production and distribution of goods and services. Formal notation: {Economic_System} → coordinates → {Economy} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000053' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Economic Systems and Social Stratification' This relation examines how different economic systems and class structures create and maintain social stratification. The relationship demonstrates how capitalism, class consciousness, and economic inequality interact to produce hierarchical social arrangements, affecting life chances, social mobility, and the distribution of power and resources in society. Formal notation: {Capitalism, Class_System} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification, Social_Inequality} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000054' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Education Educates Citizens' This relation models how educational systems educate citizens and develop human capital. Formal notation: {Education} → educates → {Social_Mobility} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000055' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Education Socialises Individuals' This relation models how educational institutions socialise individuals into cultural values and social norms. Formal notation: {Education} → socialises → {Socialisation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000056' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Educational Social Reproduction' This relation captures how educational systems perpetuate existing social inequalities across generations by providing differential educational experiences that correspond to students' social class backgrounds. Formal notation: {Education, Hidden_Curriculum} → reproduces → {Cultural_Reproduction, Social_Class} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000057' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Educational Socialisation and Cultural Reproduction' This relation models how educational institutions and family structures collectively socialise individuals into dominant cultural values and social norms. The relationship examines how formal education systems and family socialisation processes reproduce social inequality, transmit cultural capital, and shape individual identity formation within broader social structures. Formal notation: {Education, Family} → socialises → {Socialisation, Cultural_Reproduction} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000058' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Educational Stratification Process' This relation represents how educational institutions create and maintain social hierarchies through differential access to educational resources, credentials, and opportunities based on social background. Formal notation: {Education, Cultural_Capital} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification, Class_System} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000059' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Educational Stratification and Opportunity' This relation examines how educational stratification creates unequal opportunities and reproduces social inequality. The relationship demonstrates how educational tracking, resource allocation, and social class interact to create unequal educational opportunities that reproduce existing social hierarchies. Formal notation: {Education, Tracking} → stratifies → {Social_Class, Social_Mobility} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000060' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Educational Systems and Social Mobility' This relation explores how educational institutions and academic achievement collectively influence social mobility patterns, status achievement processes, and class consciousness development. The relationship reflects sociological research on education as both a pathway for individual advancement and a mechanism for reproducing existing social hierarchies through differential access to quality schooling and cultural capital transmission. Formal notation: {Education, Achieved_Status} → influencesHistorically → {Social_Mobility, Class_Consciousness} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000061' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Educational Systems and Social Mobility' This relation models how educational systems provide opportunities for social mobility while also reproducing social inequality. The relationship examines how formal education, cultural capital, and social class interact to create both opportunities for upward mobility and mechanisms for maintaining existing social hierarchies. Formal notation: {Education, Cultural_Capital} → educates → {Social_Mobility, Social_Class} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000062' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Educational Tracking Systems' This relation captures the separation of students into different educational pathways based on perceived ability or achievement, potentially reproducing social inequalities through differential educational opportunities. Formal notation: {Tracking, Education} → segregates → {Segregation, Social_Stratification} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000063' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Elite Power and Institutional Control' This relation analyses how elite social groups and power concentration work together to control key political and mass media institutions. The relationship reflects theories of elite dominance that examine how small, interconnected groups maintain disproportionate influence over major social institutions, shaping policy agendas and public discourse to serve elite interests while limiting democratic participation. Formal notation: {Elite_Model, Power_Elite} → controls → {Political_System, Mass_Media} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000064' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Environmental Mobilisation and Sustainability' This relation models how environmental mobilisation promotes sustainability and environmental protection. The relationship demonstrates how environmental movements, scientific knowledge, and public awareness interact to mobilise support for environmental protection and sustainable development. Formal notation: {Environmental_Sociology, Science} → mobilises → {Sustainable_Development, Natural_Environment} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000065' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Environmental Technology and Development' This relation analyses how technological innovation and sustainable development initiatives work together to address environmental challenges and economic transformation. The relationship demonstrates how technological innovation can create new industries while requiring significant changes in economic organisation through environmental adaptation and technological development. Formal notation: {Innovation, Sustainable_Development} → influencesHistorically → {Economic_System, Social_Change} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000066' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Ethnic Group Creates Stratification' This relation models how ethnic group membership creates social stratification and inequality. Formal notation: {Ethnic_Group} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000067' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Ethnographic Research Methods' This relation represents the systematic study of social groups and cultural practices through direct observation, participation, and immersion in natural social settings to understand meaning-making processes. Formal notation: {Ethnography, Participant_Observation} → observes → {Qualitative_Research, Cultural_Relativism} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000068' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Family Formation Processes' This relation represents legal and social establishment of parent-child relationships independent of biological reproduction, creating kinship bonds and family structures through institutional mechanisms. Formal notation: {Nuclear_Family, Extended_Family} → adopts → {Adoption, Kinship} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000069' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Family Reproduces Culture' This relation models how family structures reproduce cultural values and social norms across generations. Formal notation: {Family} → reproduces → {Cultural_Reproduction} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000070' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Family Structure Regulation' This relation models state and institutional control over family formation, marriage, and kinship relationships through legal frameworks that define legitimate family structures and relationships. Formal notation: {Law, State} → regulates → {Marriage, Family} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000071' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Formal Educational Socialisation' This relation represents the institutional process through which formal educational systems transmit knowledge, skills, and cultural values while simultaneously reproducing social hierarchies through credentialism and hidden curriculum mechanisms. Formal notation: {Education, Hidden_Curriculum} → educates → {Secondary_Socialisation, Cultural_Capital} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000072' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Gender Employment Discrimination' This relation captures systematic exclusion and differential treatment of women in labor markets through hiring practices, wage gaps, and occupational segregation that maintain gender inequality. Formal notation: {Gender_Inequality, Patriarchy} → discriminatesAgainst → {Gender_Stratification, Working_Class} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000073' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Gender Stratification Creates Inequality' This relation models how gender stratification creates systematic gender inequality in society. Formal notation: {Gender_Stratification} → stratifies → {Gender_Inequality} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000074' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Gender Stratification and Social Inequality' This relation models how gender stratification creates and maintains social inequality between men and women. The relationship demonstrates how gender roles, patriarchy, and social institutions interact to produce systematic gender inequality in access to resources, power, and opportunities. Formal notation: {Gender_Stratification, Patriarchy} → stratifies → {Gender_Inequality, Social_Inequality} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000075' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Gentrification Transforms Neighborhoods' This relation models how gentrification transforms urban neighborhoods and displaces residents. Formal notation: {Gentrification} → gentrifies → {Working_Class} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000076' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Gentrification and Residential Displacement' This relation models how gentrification processes work to transform urban neighborhoods and create displacement pressures. The relationship examines how urban renewal and neighborhood upgrading, while improving physical conditions, often force out existing residents through rising rents and property values, creating new patterns of urban inequality and spatial reorganisation. Formal notation: {Gentrification, Urban_Renewal} → excludes → {Working_Class, Poverty} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000077' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Global Influence and Cultural Exchange' This relation models how global influence processes create cultural exchange and international understanding. The relationship demonstrates how globalisation, international communication, and cultural exchange interact to create new forms of global culture and international social relationships. Formal notation: {Global_Village, Internet} → hasInfluence → {Culture, Social_Change, Social_Role} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000078' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Government Governs Society' This relation models how governmental authority governs social behaviour and maintains social order. Formal notation: {Government} → governs → {Social_Control} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000079' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Healthcare Mobilisation and Public Health' This relation models how health mobilisation promotes public health and disease prevention. The relationship demonstrates how public health campaigns, medical knowledge, and community health programs interact to mobilise communities for health promotion and disease prevention. Formal notation: {Healthcare} → mobilises → {Mortality_Rate, Health_Maintenance_Org, Social_Epidemiology} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000080' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Healthcare Social Control' This relation captures the expansion of medical authority to encompass social problems and deviant behaviours, transforming moral and social issues into medical conditions requiring professional treatment. Formal notation: {Healthcare, Health_Maintenance_Org} → medicinalises → {Social_Control, Sick_Role} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000081' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Higher Education Stratification' This relation models how educational institutions perpetuate social hierarchies through differential access to prestigious educational credentials, reproducing class advantages while appearing meritocratic through formal equality of opportunity. Formal notation: {Education, Cultural_Capital} → educates → {Social_Class, Social_Stratification} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000082' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Immigration and Cultural Integration' This relation models how immigration processes and cultural diversity situations produce various integration outcomes including cultural pluralism and identity conflicts. The relationship captures the complex dynamics of cultural change that occur when different ethnic groups interact, examining how receiving societies and immigrant communities negotiate differences while creating new hybrid cultural forms through sustained contact. Formal notation: {Immigration, Cultural_Diversity} → influencesHistorically → {Cultural_Pluralism, Culture_Shock} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000083' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Industrial Revolution and Urban Development' This relation examines how industrial revolution processes collectively drive urbanisation, creating industrial cities and concentrating working-class populations. The relationship reflects historical sociology's analysis of how technological and economic changes fundamentally restructure spatial organisation and social relationships through factory production and urban concentration, generating new forms of social organisation and class relations. Formal notation: {Industrial_Revolution, Industrialism} → urbanises → {Industrial_City, Working_Class} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000084' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Industrial Urban Development' This relation captures the transformation of geographic areas into urban centers through industrial development, infrastructure creation, and population concentration that fundamentally alters social organisation. Formal notation: {Industrial_City, Industrialism} → urbanises → {Urban_Ecology, Postindustrial_City} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000085' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Industrialisation Urbanises Society' This relation examines how industrialisation drives urbanisation and transforms social structure. Formal notation: {Industrial_Society} → urbanises → {Urbanisation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000086' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Influence Affects Behaviour' This relation models how social influence affects individual behaviour and decision-making. Formal notation: {Influence} → hasInfluence → {Social_Cohesion} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000087' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Innovation Automates Economy' This relation models how technological innovation automates economic processes and transforms production systems. Formal notation: {Innovation} → automates → {Economy} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000088' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Control and Social Regulation' This relation examines how institutional control mechanisms regulate social behaviour and maintain social order. The relationship demonstrates how formal institutions, legal systems, and administrative procedures interact to control individual and group behaviour and ensure compliance with social rules. Formal notation: {Social_Institution, Law} → controls → {Social_Control, Formal_Social_Control} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000089' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Discrimination Practices' This relation captures systematic prejudicial treatment embedded within organisational structures and social institutions that disadvantage specific groups based on ascribed characteristics rather than individual merit or qualifications. Formal notation: {Institutional_Discrimination, Racism} → discriminatesAgainst → {Ethnic_Group, Racial_Group} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000090' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Discrimination and Social Exclusion' This relation examines how institutional discrimination and prejudice create social exclusion and marginalisation. The relationship demonstrates how racism, sexism, and other forms of discrimination interact with social institutions to produce systematic inequality, limiting access to resources and opportunities for marginalised groups. Formal notation: {Racism, Gender_Inequality} → discriminatesAgainst → {Social_Exclusion, Minority_Group} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000091' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Resocialisation' This relation captures intensive processes of behavioural modification and identity reconstruction within total institutions that strip away previous social identities and impose new behavioural patterns. Formal notation: {Total_Institution, Degradation_Ceremony} → resocialises → {Resocialisation, Identity} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000092' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Resocialisation and Identity Change' This relation analyses how resocialisation processes within total institutions work to transform individual identity and social role performance. The relationship reflects Goffman's analysis of how institutions like prisons, mental hospitals, and military organisations systematically break down previous identities and reconstruct individuals according to institutional requirements through controlled environments and intensive social pressure. Formal notation: {Resocialisation, Total_Institution} → governs → {Identity, Social_Role} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000093' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Interest Group Mobilises Support' This relation examines how interest groups mobilise political support and influence policy. Formal notation: {Interest_Group} → mobilises → {Politics} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000094' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Interest Group Political Advocacy' This relation represents organised efforts to influence policy-making and public opinion on behalf of specific constituencies, causes, or interests through lobbying, campaigns, and political mobilisation. Formal notation: {Interest_Group, Political_Action_Committee_(PAC)} → advocates → {Political_System, Democracy} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000095' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Intergenerational Cultural Transmission' This relation models how cultural transmission mechanisms and language preservation work together to maintain traditional practices and linguistic systems across time. The relationship examines how cultural continuity is achieved through family socialisation, community institutions, and collective memory practices that resist assimilation pressures and cultural change through deliberate preservation efforts. Formal notation: {Cultural_Transmission, Language} → preserves → {Culture, Value} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000096' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Intergenerational Cultural Transmission' This relation captures the passage of cultural knowledge, values, and practices from older to younger generations through family socialisation and educational institutions. Formal notation: {Primary_Socialisation, Family} → transmits → {Cultural_Transmission, Value} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000097' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Internet Influences Communication' This relation examines how the internet influences the wrong side of social events. Formal notation: {Internet} → hasInfluence → {Organised_Crime} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000098' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Labeling and Deviant Identity Formation' This relation analyses how labeling theory processes and stigmatisation mechanisms work together to create deviant identities and promote social exclusion. The relationship demonstrates how social reactions to initial rule-breaking can amplify deviant behaviour by limiting conventional opportunities and pushing labeled individuals toward deviant subcultures and criminal careers through social stigma. Formal notation: {Labeling_Theory, Stigma} → stigmatises → {Deviance, Social_Exclusion} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000099' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Labor Market Employment Relations' This relation captures the fundamental economic relationship where organisations provide work opportunities to individuals, establishing formal employment contracts that define labor conditions, compensation structures, and organisational hierarchies within capitalist economic systems. Formal notation: {Multinational_Corporation, Bureaucracy} → employs → {Working_Class, Proletariat} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000100' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Labor Movement Resistance' This relation models organised worker opposition to capitalist exploitation through strikes, demonstrations, and collective bargaining that challenges employer power and demands improved working conditions. Formal notation: {Labour_Union, Trade_Union} → protests → {Strike, Working_Class} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000101' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Labor Organisation and Worker Protection' This relation examines how labor unions and trade organisations collectively protect worker interests and improve working conditions. The relationship reflects industrial relations theory on how organised labor can counterbalance employer power through solidarity and negotiation, achieving better terms of employment and workplace safety through collective action and institutional representation. Formal notation: {Labour_Union, Trade_Union} → protests → {Capitalism, Bourgeoisie} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000102' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Law Controls Behaviour' This relation examines how legal systems influence social behaviour and maintain social order. Formal notation: {Law} → hasInfluence → {Social_Control} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000103' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Legal Social Control Process' This relation captures how legal systems define certain behaviours as criminal through formal processes, creating deviant categories and justifying punishment while reflecting societal power relationships. Formal notation: {Law, Formal_Social_Control} → regulates → {Crime, Deviance} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000104' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Market Economic Control' This relation represents the dominance of market mechanisms and capitalist logic in organizing economic relationships and social life through commodity exchange and profit maximisation. Formal notation: {Capitalism, Economy} → controls → {Economic_System, Laissez-faire} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000105' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Mass Communication Process' This relation models one-way information transmission from media institutions to mass audiences, shaping public knowledge, attitudes, and cultural understanding through mediated communication. Formal notation: {Mass_Media, Multimedia} → communicatesWith → {Public_Sphere, Media_And_Communication} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000106' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Mass Media Influences Public Sphere' This relation examines how mass media influences public opinion and shapes the public sphere through information dissemination. Formal notation: {Mass_Media} → hasInfluence → {Public_Sphere} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000107' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Media Agenda Setting' This relation models how mass media institutions shape public discourse and political priorities by selecting which issues receive attention and how they are framed for public consumption. Formal notation: {Mass_Media, Media_And_Communication} → influencesHistorically → {Political_Ideologies_And_Movement, Political_System} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000108' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Media Influence and Public Opinion' This relation examines how mass media influences public opinion formation and political attitudes. The relationship demonstrates how media content, framing, and agenda-setting interact to shape public perceptions of social issues and influence political behaviour and social attitudes. Formal notation: {Mass_Media, Media_Text} → hasInfluence → {Public_Sphere, Politics} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000109' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Media Influence on Social Consciousness' This relation examines how mass media and communication technologies shape collective consciousness, social movements, and political awareness. The relationship demonstrates how media content and broadcasting systems influence public opinion formation, social mobilisation, and the construction of social reality through symbolic representation and information dissemination. Formal notation: {Mass_Media, Internet} → hasInfluence → {Social_Consciousness_And_Theoretical_Quality, Public_Sphere} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000110' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Media Information Control' This relation examines how media institutions and powerful interests shape public discourse, opinion formation, and cultural narratives through selective information presentation, agenda setting, and ideological framing mechanisms. Formal notation: {Mass_Media, Power_Elite} → controls → {Public_Sphere, Hegemony} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000111' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Media and Crime Perception' This relation analyses how mass media coverage and crime reporting work together to shape public perceptions and social reactions to criminal behaviour. The relationship demonstrates how media attention and sensationalised reporting can generate disproportionate concern about particular social problems, leading to punitive policies and moral panic responses through amplified coverage. Formal notation: {Mass_Media, Crime} → influencesHistorically → {Social_Control, Deviance} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000112' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Media and Youth Cultural Influence' This relation analyses how mass media, peer group dynamics, and youth culture work together to influence fashion trends and cultural consumption patterns. The relationship captures how contemporary adolescent socialisation increasingly occurs through mediated experiences and peer networks, creating distinct generational cultures and commercial markets targeting young consumers through shared cultural symbols and practices. Formal notation: {Mass_Media, Peer_Group, Youth_Culture} → hasInfluence → {Fashion, Culture} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000113' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Migration and Urban Diversity' This relation examines how migration flows collectively contribute to urban population growth and cultural diversity. The relationship captures how cities become diverse through selective migration patterns that create distinct ethnic communities while contributing to overall urban expansion and cultural complexity through the concentration of different population groups in urban areas. Formal notation: {Migration, Population} → influencesHistorically → {Urbanism, Cultural_Diversity} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000114' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Nationalism and State Formation' This relation examines how nationalist ideologies and state formation processes together create national identity and citizenship concepts. The relationship reflects historical sociology's analysis of how modern nation-states construct shared identity through education Formal notation: {Nation_State, Nationalism} → socialises → {Politics, Identity} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000115' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Organisation Coordinates Activities' This relation examines how organisations coordinate social activities and achieve collective goals. Formal notation: {Organisation} → coordinates → {Collective_Behaviour} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000116' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Organisational Collaborative Relations' This relation represents cooperative working relationships between organisations, groups, or individuals pursuing shared goals through coordinated action, resource sharing, and mutual support. Formal notation: {Coalition, Interest_Group} → collaboratesWith → {Resource_Mobilisation, Quality_Circle} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000117' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Organisational Coordination and Efficiency' This relation examines how organisational coordination enables efficiency and goal achievement. The relationship demonstrates how organisational structures, communication systems, and management practices interact to coordinate individual efforts and achieve organisational objectives. Formal notation: {Organisation, Bureaucracy} → coordinates → {Structuration, Rationalisation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000118' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Organisational Management Control' This relation models administrative oversight and coordination of organisational activities through hierarchical authority structures that maintain efficiency while potentially alienating workers from decision-making processes. Formal notation: {Bureaucracy, Formal_Organisation} → manages → {Organisation, Invention} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000119' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Participant Observation Research' This relation models ethnographic research methodology where researchers immerse themselves in social settings to understand cultural practices and social meanings through direct participation. Formal notation: {Participant_Observation, Ethnography} → observes → {Observation, Qualitative_Research} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000120' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Patriarchal Authority Relations' This relation models hierarchical gender relationships where women are systematically placed in subordinate positions within family structures, economic systems, and political institutions. Formal notation: {Patriarchy, Gender_Order} → subordinatedTo → {Authority, Gender_Role} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000121' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Patriarchal Systems and Gender Stratification' This relation analyses how patriarchal social structures and traditional gender role expectations collectively create and maintain gender inequality and stratification systems. The relationship reflects feminist sociological theory on how male-dominated institutions, cultural norms, and socialisation practices work together to systematically disadvantage women and maintain male privilege across economic, political, and social spheres. Formal notation: {Patriarchy, Gender_Role} → stratifies → {Gender_Inequality, Gender_Stratification} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000122' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Peer Group Socialisation and Identity Formation' This relation models how peer groups and social networks influence individual identity formation and social development. The relationship examines how peer pressure, social interaction, and group membership interact to shape individual behaviour, values, and social identity during critical developmental periods. Formal notation: {Peer_Group, Social_Network} → socialises → {Identity, Socialisation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000123' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Peer Group Socialises Youth' This relation models how peer groups socialise young people into group norms and behaviours. Formal notation: {Peer_Group} → socialises → {Socialisation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000124' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Political Authority and Social Control' This relation models how political systems and governmental authority exercise social control and maintain social order. The relationship examines how democracy, bureaucracy, and legal-rational authority interact to regulate social behaviour, enforce norms, and manage social conflict through formal institutional mechanisms. Formal notation: {Government, Bureaucracy} → governs → {Social_Control, Law} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000125' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Political Mobilisation and Democratic Participation' This relation examines how political mobilisation enables democratic participation and political change. The relationship demonstrates how political parties, interest groups, and social movements interact to mobilise citizens for political participation and influence political decision-making processes. Formal notation: {Interest_Group, Political_System} → mobilises → {Democracy, Politics} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000126' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Political Representation Process' This relation captures how elected officials, organisations, or spokespersons act on behalf of constituencies, translating citizen preferences into political action within democratic institutional frameworks. Formal notation: {Representative_Democracy, Political_System} → represents → {Democracy, Participatory_Democracy} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000127' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Political Resource Mobilisation' This relation represents the strategic gathering and deployment of material and symbolic resources by political organisations to influence policy decisions and electoral outcomes. Formal notation: {Political_Action_Committee_(PAC), Interest_Group} → mobilises → {Resource_Mobilisation, Politics} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000128' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Politics Influence Organisations' This relation examines how political systems create formal organisational structures. Formal notation: {Political_Systems_And_Governance_Form} → bureaucratises → {Formal_Organisation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000129' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Population Migration Patterns' This relation models the movement of populations across geographic boundaries driven by economic opportunities, political conflicts, environmental factors, or social conditions, transforming both origin and destination communities. Formal notation: {Migration, Immigration} → migrates → {Diaspora, Push_And_Pull_Factor} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000130' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Post-Fordist Production and Employment Flexibility' This relation analyses how post-Fordist production methods and flexible manufacturing systems together create temporary work arrangements and economic insecurity. The relationship captures how contemporary capitalism emphasises adaptability and efficiency through contingent employment, outsourcing, and just-in-time production that transfers economic risk from firms to workers through employment reorganisation. Formal notation: {Post-Fordism, Flexible_Production} → influencesHistorically → {Job_Insecurity, Outsourcing} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000131' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Poverty and Social Disadvantage' This relation examines how poverty conditions and underdevelopment processes collectively influence crime rates and health outcomes. The relationship reflects research on how economic deprivation creates cascading effects across multiple life domains, demonstrating how material disadvantage shapes individual life chances and community social organisation through resource scarcity and limited opportunities. Formal notation: {Poverty, Underdevelopment} → causallyInfluencedBy → {Crime, Health} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000132' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Power Elite Mobilises Development' This relation examines how the power elite mobilise resources for local development. Formal notation: {Power_Elite} → mobilises → {Social_Change} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000133' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Power and Political Control' This relation analyses how power concentration and authority structures work together to control political institutions and maintain social order. The relationship demonstrates how political elites maintain dominance through institutional control and coercive mechanisms while limiting political competition and suppressing dissent through systematic use of state power and regulatory authority. Formal notation: {Power, Authority} → controls → {Government, Social_Control} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000134' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Primary Group Social Interaction' This relation models face-to-face social interaction and communication within small social groups, establishing social bonds, shared meanings, and collective identity through regular interpersonal contact. Formal notation: {Primary_Group, Small_Group} → communicatesWith → {Social_Interaction, Dyad} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000135' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Primary Socialisation Processes' This relation represents the fundamental process through which social institutions transmit cultural norms, values, and behavioural expectations to individuals, particularly during formative developmental periods when basic social identity formation occurs. Formal notation: {Nuclear_Family, Extended_Family} → socialises → {Primary_Socialisation, Secondary_Socialisation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000136' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Primary Socialisation and Identity Formation' This relation examines how primary socialisation agents—family units and educational institutions—collectively shape individual identity development, value acquisition, and social role learning. The relationship reflects classic sociological theory on how early social experiences fundamentally structure personality, worldview, and behavioural patterns through intensive interaction with significant others during formative developmental periods. Formal notation: {Primary_Socialisation, Family, Education} → socialises → {Identity, Value, Social_Role} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000137' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Private Property Relations' This relation represents legal control over material assets and means of production that creates class divisions between property owners and propertyless workers in capitalist economic systems. Formal notation: {Capitalist, Bourgeoisie} → owns → {Means_Of_Production, Monopoly} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000138' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Professional Network Formation' This relation represents the creation of career-based social connections that facilitate job opportunities, professional advancement, and knowledge sharing within occupational fields. Formal notation: {Professional_Criminal, Entrepreneur} → networks → {Social_Network, Social_Cohesion} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000139' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Public Opinion Research' This relation represents systematic measurement of population attitudes, preferences, and behaviours through standardised data collection methods that inform policy decisions and academic research. Formal notation: {Survey, Questionnaire} → surveys → {Qualitative_Research_Method, Quantitative_Research_Method, Representative_Sample} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000140' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Qualitative Research Interviewing' This relation represents in-depth conversation-based data collection methods used to understand subjective experiences, meanings, and perspectives in qualitative sociological research. Formal notation: {Interview, Biographical_Method} → interviews → {Qualitative_Research, Life_History} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000141' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Racial Spatial Segregation' This relation models the systematic spatial separation of racial and ethnic groups through housing policies, economic mechanisms, and institutional practices that create homogeneous neighborhoods and limit intergroup contact. Formal notation: {Apartheid, Institutional_Discrimination} → segregates → {Segregation, Defended_Neighborhood} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000142' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Racial Stratification and Social Hierarchy' This relation models how racial stratification creates and maintains social hierarchies based on racial categories. The relationship demonstrates how racism, racial ideology, and social institutions interact to produce systematic racial inequality and maintain racial hierarchies in society. Formal notation: {Racism, Ethnic_Group} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification, Social_Class} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000143' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Racism Discriminates Against Minorities' This relation examines how racism creates systematic discrimination against minority groups. Formal notation: {Racism} → discriminatesAgainst → {Minority_Group} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000144' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Rehabilitation and Social Reintegration' This relation examines how rehabilitation programs and correctional systems attempt to achieve social reintegration of offenders. The relationship captures ongoing debates about punishment versus treatment approaches, demonstrating how different correctional philosophies shape institutional practices and outcomes through varying emphasis on deterrence, therapy, and skill development programs. Formal notation: {Rehabilitation, Capital_Punishment} → influencesHistorically → {Crime, Social_Control} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000145' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Religion Socialises Believers' This relation models how religious institutions socialise individuals into religious values and practices. Formal notation: {Religion} → socialises → {Socialisation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000146' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Religious Authority and Social Cohesion' This relation examines how religious institutions and traditional authority structures collectively transmit sacred beliefs and social cohesion mechanisms. The relationship reflects Durkheim's analysis of religion's integrative function, demonstrating how shared ritual practices and belief systems create collective solidarity while providing meaning structures that bind communities together across social divisions through common values and practices. Formal notation: {Religion, Traditional_Authority} → transmits → {Sacred, Social_Cohesion} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000147' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Religious Institutionalisation' This relation captures the establishment of formal religious organisations with hierarchical structures, standardised practices, and official doctrines that regulate spiritual life and moral behaviour. Formal notation: {Church, Denomination} → institutionalises → {Religious_Organisation, Religion} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000148' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Religious Secularisation Process' This relation captures the declining influence of religious institutions and beliefs in public life as modern state institutions assume regulatory functions previously controlled by religious authorities. Formal notation: {Secularisation, Modernisation} → regulates → {Religion, Religious_Organisation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000149' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Religious Socialisation and Moral Development' This relation models how religious institutions socialise individuals into moral frameworks and value systems. The relationship examines how religious beliefs, rituals, and communities interact to shape individual moral development and provide social support and meaning systems. Formal notation: {Religion, Religious_Ritual} → socialises → {Value, Socialisation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000150' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Resource Mobilisation Mobilises Movements' This relation models how resource mobilisation enables social movements to achieve their goals. Formal notation: {Resource_Mobilisation} → mobilises → {Social_Movement} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000151' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Resource Mobilisation and Social Movements' This relation models how resource mobilisation enables social movements to achieve their goals and influence social change. The relationship examines how organisational resources, social networks, and collective action interact to create effective social movements that can challenge existing power structures and promote social transformation. Formal notation: {Resource_Mobilisation, Social_Network} → mobilises → {Social_Movement, Collective_Behaviour} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000152' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Resource Mobilisation for Collective Action' This relation examines how social movements and political organisations gather, organize, and deploy material and symbolic resources to achieve collective goals and challenge existing power structures through strategic collective action. Formal notation: {Resource_Mobilisation, Political_Action_Committee_(PAC)} → mobilises → {Social_Movement, Strike} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000153' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Rural-Urban Population Movement' This relation models demographic transitions from agricultural to urban areas driven by industrialisation, economic opportunities, and changing social structures that transform both rural and urban communities. Formal notation: {Urbanisation, Industrial_Society} → migrates → {Migration, Demographic_Transition} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000154' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Science Innovates Technology' This relation examines how scientific knowledge drives technological innovation and development. Formal notation: {Science} → innovates → {Innovation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000155' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Segregation Divides Communities' This relation models how segregation creates spatial and social divisions within communities. Formal notation: {Segregation} → segregates → {Social_Class} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000156' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Control Regulates Behaviour' This relation examines how social control mechanisms regulate individual and group behaviour. Formal notation: {Social_Control} → regulates → {Deviance} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000157' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Control and Crime Prevention' This relation models how social control mechanisms prevent crime and maintain social safety. The relationship demonstrates how law enforcement, community policing, and social prevention programs interact to control criminal behaviour and maintain public safety and social order. Formal notation: {Law, Social_Control} → controls → {Crime, Formal_Social_Control} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000158' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Control and Deviance Prevention' This relation examines how social control mechanisms prevent deviance and maintain social order. The relationship demonstrates how formal and informal control systems interact with social norms and sanctions to prevent deviant behaviour and ensure conformity to expected social standards. Formal notation: {Social_Control, Formal_Social_Control} → controls → {Deviance, Informal_Social_Control} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000159' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Control and Normative Regulation' This relation models how social control institutions and legal systems collectively regulate normative behaviour and maintain social order. The relationship examines how formal and informal control mechanisms work together to enforce social norms through surveillance, sanctions, and socialisation processes that promote conformity and deter deviance through systematic regulation. Formal notation: {Social_Control, Law} → regulates → {Deviance, Crime} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000160' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Coordination and Collective Action' This relation examines how social coordination enables collective action and social organisation. The relationship demonstrates how social norms, communication systems, and shared values interact to coordinate individual actions into collective efforts that can achieve social goals and maintain social order. Formal notation: {Norm, Language} → coordinates → {Collective_Behaviour, Social_Structure} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000161' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Coordination and Conflict Resolution' This relation models how social coordination enables conflict resolution and social harmony. The relationship demonstrates how mediation processes, negotiation systems, and social norms interact to coordinate conflicting interests and resolve social conflicts peacefully. Formal notation: {Negotiation, Conflict_Perspective} → coordinates → {Social_Movement, Social_Cohesion} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000162' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Exclusion and Marginalisation' This relation models systematic processes by which dominant groups deny access to social resources, opportunities, and participation to subordinated populations, perpetuating inequality and maintaining hierarchical social structures through institutional discrimination. Formal notation: {Upper_Class, Bourgeoisie} → excludes → {Underclass, Minority_Group} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000163' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Institutionalisation Processes' This relation models the establishment of stable, recognised patterns of social organisation that become taken-for-granted aspects of social structure, providing predictability and continuity. Formal notation: {Social_Institution, Formal_Organisation} → institutionalises → {Social_Structure, Organisation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000164' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Institutions Control Behaviour' This relation examines how social institutions influence individual and group behaviour through formal mechanisms. Formal notation: {Social_Institution} → hasInfluence → {Social_Control} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000165' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Marginalisation Mechanisms' This relation represents processes that push individuals or groups to the social periphery, reducing their access to mainstream institutions, resources, and opportunities while maintaining their subordinate status. Formal notation: {Neoliberalism, Structural_Functionalism} → marginalises → {Social_Exclusion, Relative_Deprivation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000166' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Marginalisation and Deviance' This relation models how social marginalisation processes create and maintain deviant behaviour and social exclusion. The relationship examines how labeling theory, social control mechanisms, and stigma interact to marginalise individuals and groups, often leading to further deviance and social isolation. Formal notation: {Deviance, Stigma} → marginalises → {Social_Exclusion, Minority_Group} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000167' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Media and Network Society' This relation analyses how mass media platforms and network structures together influence identity formation and social capital development. The relationship demonstrates how digital networks enable new forms of social organisation while creating information environments that can both enhance and fragment social cohesion through technological intermediation and algorithmic filtering. Formal notation: {Mass_Media, Network} → influencesHistorically → {Identity, Social_Network} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000168' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Movement Mobilises Change' This relation models how social movements mobilise collective action to promote social change. Formal notation: {Social_Movement} → mobilises → {Social_Change} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000169' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Movement Organisation' This relation represents the systematic organisation and synchronisation of collective action through leadership structures, resource allocation, and strategic planning to achieve social change goals. Formal notation: {Social_Movement, Resource_Mobilisation} → coordinates → {Coalition, Political_Action_Committee_(PAC)} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000170' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Movement Political Impact' This relation models how organised collective action and social movements shape political processes, policy formation, and institutional change through mobilisation of resources, public opinion formation, and pressure on political decision-making structures. Formal notation: {Social_Movement, New_Social_Movement} → hasInfluence → {Political_System, Democracy} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000171' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Movements and Collective Action' This relation models how social movements mobilise collective action to challenge existing power structures and promote social change. The relationship examines how resource mobilisation, collective behaviour, and social networks interact to create effective social movements that can influence political systems and social institutions. Formal notation: {Social_Movement, Collective_Behaviour} → mobilises → {Politics, Social_Change} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000172' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Movements and Political Challenge' This relation models how social movement activity and resource mobilisation strategies collectively challenge existing political systems and alter power structures. The relationship captures how organised collective action can achieve social change through political pressure, public advocacy, and institutional reform efforts that shift policy agendas and power distributions through sustained political engagement. Formal notation: {Social_Movement, Resource_Mobilisation} → protests → {Political_System, Government} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000173' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Network Formation' This relation models how individuals and groups form interconnected relationships that facilitate information flow, resource sharing, and collective action while creating social connections and influencing life opportunities. Formal notation: {Social_Network, Internet} → networks → {Social_Interaction, Peer_Group} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000174' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Network Mobilisation and Collective Action' This relation examines how social networks mobilise individuals for collective action and social change. The relationship demonstrates how network ties, social capital, and collective identity interact to mobilise people for social movements and collective efforts to achieve social goals. Formal notation: {Social_Network, Network} → mobilises → {Collective_Behaviour, Social_Movement} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000175' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Network Mobilises Resources' This relation examines how social networks mobilise social resources and support collective action. Formal notation: {Social_Network} → mobilises → {Collective_Behaviour} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000176' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Regulation and Norm Enforcement' This relation examines how social institutions regulate behaviour and enforce social norms. The relationship demonstrates how formal and informal social control mechanisms interact with social norms and values to maintain social order, prevent deviance, and ensure conformity to expected social behaviour. Formal notation: {Social_Control, Norm} → regulates → {Deviance, Formal_Social_Control} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000177' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Reproduction Processes' This relation models how social systems perpetuate existing class structures, inequalities, and power relationships across generations through institutional mechanisms that maintain social hierarchies despite apparent meritocratic ideologies. Formal notation: {Cultural_Reproduction, Education} → reproduces → {Social_Class, Cultural_Capital} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000178' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Research Data Collection' This relation represents systematic gathering of information from populations using standardised questionnaires to measure attitudes, behaviours, and social characteristics for empirical sociological analysis. Formal notation: {Survey, Census} → surveys → {Quantitative_Research_Method, Representative_Sample} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000179' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Research Measurement' This relation represents the quantification and assessment of social phenomena through operational definitions, statistical techniques, and empirical indicators for scientific analysis. Formal notation: {Operational_Definition, Variable} → measures → {Correlation_Coefficient, Validity} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000180' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Segregation and Spatial Organisation' This relation models how social segregation creates spatial patterns of inequality and social organisation. The relationship examines how residential segregation, social class, and ethnic divisions interact to produce spatially organised social hierarchies that reinforce social inequality and limit social interaction across group boundaries. Formal notation: {Segregation, Social_Class} → segregates → {Urban_Ecology, Social_Social_Spatial_Region} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000181' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Stigmatisation Processes' This relation models how societies mark certain individuals or groups as deviant, undesirable, or morally discredited, leading to social rejection, discrimination, and reduced life opportunities through labeling processes. Formal notation: {Labeling_Theory, Social_Constructionist_Perspective} → stigmatises → {Stigma, Deviance} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000182' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Social Stigmatisation and Identity Management' This relation examines how social stigmatisation affects individual identity and social interaction. The relationship demonstrates how stigma, social labeling, and identity management interact to create social exclusion and force individuals to manage their identities in response to negative social judgments and discrimination. Formal notation: {Stigma, Labeling_Theory} → stigmatises → {Identity, Social_Exclusion} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000183' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Spatial Social Organisation' This relation captures the relationship between social groups and their physical environments, including how spatial arrangements reflect and reproduce social hierarchies and community relationships. Formal notation: {Suburb, Megalopolis} → inhabits → {Defended_Neighborhood, Squatter_Settlement} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000184' named individual is associated to the relation: 'State Social Control Mechanisms' This relation examines how governmental and legal institutions establish, monitor, and enforce social norms and behavioural standards through formal mechanisms of social control including legislation, judicial processes, and administrative oversight. Formal notation: {State, Government} → regulates → {Social_Control, Law} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000185' named individual is associated to the relation: 'State Welfare and Social Redistribution' This relation models how state institutions and social policy frameworks collectively redistribute economic resources and provide healthcare access. The relationship examines how government programs address market inequalities through transfer payments, public services, and social insurance systems that reduce poverty and provide economic security for vulnerable populations through institutional intervention. Formal notation: {State, Healthcare} → provides → {Social_Inequality, Poverty} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000186' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Status Group Competition' This relation models rivalry between social groups for prestige, recognition, and symbolic resources that maintain group boundaries and hierarchical social distinctions. Formal notation: {Status_Group, Ethnic_Group} → competesWith → {Prestige, Social_Inequality} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000187' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Stigma Stigmatises Individuals' This relation examines how social stigma creates negative labeling and social exclusion. Formal notation: {Stigma} → stigmatises → {Identity} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000188' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Suburbanisation and Spatial Restructuring' This relation analyses how suburbanisation processes work to create suburban communities and new forms of spatial organisation. The relationship captures post-WWII urban restructuring that separated residential, commercial, and industrial zones while creating class and racial segregation through housing markets and transportation infrastructure that enabled middle-class flight from urban centers. Formal notation: {Suburb} → spatiallyRelatedTo → {Segregation, Migration} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000189' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Surveillance Social Control' This relation captures systematic observation and tracking of populations by state and corporate institutions to maintain social order, prevent deviance, and gather information for administrative control. Formal notation: {Formal_Social_Control, State} → monitors → {Observation, Social_Control} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000190' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Technological Change and Work Transformation' This relation analyses how technological innovation and automation processes together transform work organisation and employment patterns. The relationship captures how technological advancement eliminates some jobs while creating others, requiring workers to develop new competencies while reshaping the nature of work through digital technologies and industrial reorganisation. Formal notation: {Innovation, Internet} → influencesHistorically → {Economy, Economic_And_Industrial_Transformation_Process} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000191' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Technological Influence and Social Adaptation' This relation examines how technological influence requires social adaptation and creates new social forms. The relationship demonstrates how technological change, social learning, and cultural adaptation interact to help societies adapt to new technologies and create new social practices. Formal notation: {Innovation, Cultural_Pluralism} → hasInfluence → {Social_Change, Modernisation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000192' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Technological Innovation and Social Change' This relation examines how technological innovation drives social change and transforms social institutions. The relationship demonstrates how scientific discovery, technological development, and social adaptation interact to create new social forms, economic opportunities, and cultural practices that reshape society. Formal notation: {Innovation, Science} → innovates → {Social_Change, Modernisation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000193' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Technological Social Innovation' This relation captures the introduction of new technologies, practices, or ideas that transform social organisation, economic production, and cultural patterns while creating both opportunities and disruptions. Formal notation: {Innovation, Industrial_Revolution} → innovates → {Social_Change, Invention} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000194' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Technology and Social Change' This relation examines how technological innovations together influence healthcare systems and social organisation. The relationship captures how technological development creates new possibilities for social organisation while raising questions about equality, identity, and social adaptation in increasingly technological societies through systematic social transformation. Formal notation: {Innovation, Healthcare} → influencesHistorically → {Social_Change, Holistic_Medicine} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000195' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Urban Development and Social Change' This relation captures the transformation of rural areas into urban centers, involving population concentration, economic restructuring, and fundamental changes in social organisation, community relationships, and lifestyle patterns. Formal notation: {Urbanisation, Industrial_Revolution} → urbanises → {Urban_Ecology, Metropolis} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000196' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Urban Gentrification Displacement' This relation captures the process of neighborhood transformation where middle-class residents and businesses displace lower-income communities through property value increases, cultural changes, and economic restructuring. Formal notation: {Gentrification, Urban_Renewal} → gentrifies → {Working_Class, Social_Exclusion} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000197' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Urban Gentrification and Social Displacement' This relation models how urban gentrification processes displace existing communities and transform neighborhood social composition. The relationship examines how economic development, housing markets, and social class interact to produce gentrification that often displaces lower-income residents while attracting higher-income newcomers. Formal notation: {Gentrification, Urban_Renewal} → gentrifies → {Working_Class, Social_Class} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000198' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Urban Planning and Spatial Organisation' This relation analyses how government policies and planning practices shape urban form through land use controls and infrastructure investment. The relationship demonstrates how state intervention and bureaucratic planning decisions structure residential patterns and commercial development through regulatory frameworks that influence where different social groups live and work. Formal notation: {Government, Bureaucracy} → regulates → {Urbanism, Organisation} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000199' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Urbanisation and Social Transformation' This relation examines how urbanisation processes transform social structures and create new forms of social organisation. The relationship demonstrates how urban growth, industrialisation, and demographic changes interact to produce new social relationships, cultural patterns, and economic opportunities in urban environments. Formal notation: {Urbanisation, Industrial_Society} → urbanises → {Urbanism, Social_Structure} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000200' named individual is associated to the relation: 'World System Economic Integration' This relation models the hierarchical organisation of the global economy through core-periphery relationships that concentrate wealth and power in developed nations while maintaining dependency in developing regions. Formal notation: {World_System, Multinational_Corporation} → controls → {Core_Country, Peripheral_Country} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The 'causal_Event_ID000201' named individual is associated to the relation: 'Youth Mobilisation and Social Change' This relation examines how youth mobilisation drives social change and cultural innovation. The relationship demonstrates how youth culture, social movements, and generational change interact to mobilise young people for social change and cultural innovation. Formal notation: {Youth_Culture, Social_Movement} → mobilises → {Social_Change, Culture} Remark: The 'causal_Event_ID000nnn' individuals represent reified causal events capturing sociological relations defined by their name and the symbolic description. They are named individuals of the 'Collective_Causal_Event' class, with identifiers reflecting their systematic role in modelling complex n-ary sociological relationships.
The census_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Research Data Collection' Causal relation: {Survey, Census} → surveys → {Quantitative_Research_Method, Representative_Sample} Semantical explanation of census_ID000001: A census is an enumeration, or counting, of a population, typically conducted by a government at regular intervals. It aims to gather comprehensive demographic, social, and economic data about all individuals residing within a country or region at a specific point in time. The information collected in a census can include age, sex, race, ethnicity, education level, occupation, income, and household characteristics. This data is crucial for various purposes, such as allocating government resources, determining political representation, and informing policy decisions. The methodology of a census can vary, but it often involves distributing questionnaires to households or conducting door-to-door surveys. Ensuring accuracy and completeness in a census can be challenging due to factors like population mobility and reluctance to participate. Modern censuses often utilise technology to improve data collection and processing.
The church_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Religious Institutionalisation' Causal relation: {Church, Denomination} → institutionalises → {Religious_Organisation, Religion} Semantical explanation of church_ID000001: A church is a large body of people belonging to an established religious organisation. Churches normally have a formal structure, with a hierarchy of religious officials, and the term is also used for the building where their religious ceremonials are held. Churches tend to be well-integrated into the broader society and often have a significant influence on social norms and values. They typically have a long history and established doctrines and practices. In sociological terms, a church is often contrasted with other types of religious organisations, such as sects and cults, which tend to be smaller, less formally organised, and may have more unconventional beliefs or practices. Churches often play a role in providing social services, education, and community support to their members.
The class_Consciousness_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Systems and Social Mobility' Causal relation: {Education, Achieved_Status} → influencesHistorically → {Social_Mobility, Class_Consciousness} Semantical explanation of class_Consciousness_ID000001: In Karl Marx's view, class consciousness is a subjective awareness held by members of a class regarding their common vested interests and need for collective political action to bring about social change. Marx argued that for the proletariat (working class) to overcome their exploitation by the bourgeoisie (capitalist class), they needed to develop an understanding of their shared economic situation and their common interests in challenging the capitalist system. This awareness would then lead to collective action, such as organizing into labor unions and engaging in political struggle, to ultimately transform society and establish a communist system where the means of production are collectively owned. The development of class consciousness is a crucial step in Marx's theory of social change.
The class_System_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Systems and Social Stratification' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Class_System} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of class_System_ID000001: A class system is a form of social ranking based primarily on economic position in which achieved characteristics can influence mobility. Unlike caste systems, where social position is ascribed at birth and cannot be changed, class systems allow for social mobility, the movement of individuals or groups up or down the social hierarchy, based on factors such as education, occupation, and income (achieved characteristics). While economic factors are central to class systems, social status and power also play a role. Class systems are characteristic of modern industrial societies and are considered more open than caste systems, although the extent of social mobility can vary significantly. Sociologists often study class systems to understand patterns of inequality and the factors that influence social mobility.
The class_System_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Stratification Process' Causal relation: {Education, Cultural_Capital} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification, Class_System} Semantical explanation of class_System_ID000002: A class system is a form of social ranking based primarily on economic position in which achieved characteristics can influence mobility. Unlike caste systems, where social position is ascribed at birth and cannot be changed, class systems allow for social mobility, the movement of individuals or groups up or down the social hierarchy, based on factors such as education, occupation, and income (achieved characteristics). While economic factors are central to class systems, social status and power also play a role. Class systems are characteristic of modern industrial societies and are considered more open than caste systems, although the extent of social mobility can vary significantly. Sociologists often study class systems to understand patterns of inequality and the factors that influence social mobility.
The coalition_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Organisational Collaborative Relations' Causal relation: {Coalition, Interest_Group} → collaboratesWith → {Resource_Mobilisation, Quality_Circle} Semantical explanation of coalition_ID000001: A coalition is a temporary or permanent alliance geared toward a common goal, often formed by individuals or groups who may have different interests or goals in other areas but come together to achieve a specific shared objective. Coalitions can be found in various social contexts, including politics, business, and social movements. They are often formed to increase the collective power and influence of the participating members in order to achieve a goal that might be difficult or impossible to achieve individually. The stability and effectiveness of a coalition can depend on factors such as the clarity of the common goal, the commitment of the members, and the distribution of power within the alliance. Coalitions can be fluid and may dissolve once the shared goal is achieved or if internal conflicts arise.
The coalition_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Movement Organisation' Causal relation: {Social_Movement, Resource_Mobilisation} → coordinates → {Coalition, Political_Action_Committee_(PAC)} Semantical explanation of coalition_ID000002: A coalition is a temporary or permanent alliance geared toward a common goal, often formed by individuals or groups who may have different interests or goals in other areas but come together to achieve a specific shared objective. Coalitions can be found in various social contexts, including politics, business, and social movements. They are often formed to increase the collective power and influence of the participating members in order to achieve a goal that might be difficult or impossible to achieve individually. The stability and effectiveness of a coalition can depend on factors such as the clarity of the common goal, the commitment of the members, and the distribution of power within the alliance. Coalitions can be fluid and may dissolve once the shared goal is achieved or if internal conflicts arise.
The collective_Behaviour_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Anomie and Social Disorganisation' Causal relation: {Anomie, Collective_Behaviour} → influencesHistorically → {Deviance, Crime} Semantical explanation of collective_Behaviour_ID000001: Collective behaviour encompasses activities of people and social groups that typically emerge spontaneously (such as crowds, riots, and so on) rather than arising from established processes of socialisation leading to conformity to social rules and norms. These behaviours often occur in response to a shared situation or stimulus and can involve large numbers of people acting in relatively unstructured ways. Examples of collective behaviour include panics, fads, rumors, social movements, and disasters. Sociologists study collective behaviour to understand the dynamics of group actions that are not governed by typical social structures or institutions. Factors such as anonymity, suggestibility, and the rapid spread of information can play a significant role in shaping collective behaviour.
The collective_Behaviour_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Democracy and Civic Participation' Causal relation: {Democracy, Politics} → influencesHistorically → {Social_Movement, Collective_Behaviour} Semantical explanation of collective_Behaviour_ID000002: Collective behaviour encompasses activities of people and social groups that typically emerge spontaneously (such as crowds, riots, and so on) rather than arising from established processes of socialisation leading to conformity to social rules and norms. These behaviours often occur in response to a shared situation or stimulus and can involve large numbers of people acting in relatively unstructured ways. Examples of collective behaviour include panics, fads, rumors, social movements, and disasters. Sociologists study collective behaviour to understand the dynamics of group actions that are not governed by typical social structures or institutions. Factors such as anonymity, suggestibility, and the rapid spread of information can play a significant role in shaping collective behaviour.
The collective_Behaviour_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Organisation Coordinates Activities' Causal relation: {Organisation} → coordinates → {Collective_Behaviour} Semantical explanation of collective_Behaviour_ID000003: Collective behaviour encompasses activities of people and social groups that typically emerge spontaneously (such as crowds, riots, and so on) rather than arising from established processes of socialisation leading to conformity to social rules and norms. These behaviours often occur in response to a shared situation or stimulus and can involve large numbers of people acting in relatively unstructured ways. Examples of collective behaviour include panics, fads, rumors, social movements, and disasters. Sociologists study collective behaviour to understand the dynamics of group actions that are not governed by typical social structures or institutions. Factors such as anonymity, suggestibility, and the rapid spread of information can play a significant role in shaping collective behaviour.
The collective_Behaviour_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Resource Mobilisation and Social Movements' Causal relation: {Resource_Mobilisation, Social_Network} → mobilises → {Social_Movement, Collective_Behaviour} Semantical explanation of collective_Behaviour_ID000004: Collective behaviour encompasses activities of people and social groups that typically emerge spontaneously (such as crowds, riots, and so on) rather than arising from established processes of socialisation leading to conformity to social rules and norms. These behaviours often occur in response to a shared situation or stimulus and can involve large numbers of people acting in relatively unstructured ways. Examples of collective behaviour include panics, fads, rumors, social movements, and disasters. Sociologists study collective behaviour to understand the dynamics of group actions that are not governed by typical social structures or institutions. Factors such as anonymity, suggestibility, and the rapid spread of information can play a significant role in shaping collective behaviour.
The collective_Behaviour_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Coordination and Collective Action' Causal relation: {Norm, Language} → coordinates → {Collective_Behaviour, Social_Structure} Semantical explanation of collective_Behaviour_ID000005: Collective behaviour encompasses activities of people and social groups that typically emerge spontaneously (such as crowds, riots, and so on) rather than arising from established processes of socialisation leading to conformity to social rules and norms. These behaviours often occur in response to a shared situation or stimulus and can involve large numbers of people acting in relatively unstructured ways. Examples of collective behaviour include panics, fads, rumors, social movements, and disasters. Sociologists study collective behaviour to understand the dynamics of group actions that are not governed by typical social structures or institutions. Factors such as anonymity, suggestibility, and the rapid spread of information can play a significant role in shaping collective behaviour.
The collective_Behaviour_ID000006 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Movements and Collective Action' Causal relation: {Social_Movement, Collective_Behaviour} → mobilises → {Politics, Social_Change} Semantical explanation of collective_Behaviour_ID000006: Collective behaviour encompasses activities of people and social groups that typically emerge spontaneously (such as crowds, riots, and so on) rather than arising from established processes of socialisation leading to conformity to social rules and norms. These behaviours often occur in response to a shared situation or stimulus and can involve large numbers of people acting in relatively unstructured ways. Examples of collective behaviour include panics, fads, rumors, social movements, and disasters. Sociologists study collective behaviour to understand the dynamics of group actions that are not governed by typical social structures or institutions. Factors such as anonymity, suggestibility, and the rapid spread of information can play a significant role in shaping collective behaviour.
The collective_Behaviour_ID000007 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Network Mobilisation and Collective Action' Causal relation: {Social_Network, Network} → mobilises → {Collective_Behaviour, Social_Movement} Semantical explanation of collective_Behaviour_ID000007: Collective behaviour encompasses activities of people and social groups that typically emerge spontaneously (such as crowds, riots, and so on) rather than arising from established processes of socialisation leading to conformity to social rules and norms. These behaviours often occur in response to a shared situation or stimulus and can involve large numbers of people acting in relatively unstructured ways. Examples of collective behaviour include panics, fads, rumors, social movements, and disasters. Sociologists study collective behaviour to understand the dynamics of group actions that are not governed by typical social structures or institutions. Factors such as anonymity, suggestibility, and the rapid spread of information can play a significant role in shaping collective behaviour.
The collective_Behaviour_ID000008 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Network Mobilises Resources' Causal relation: {Social_Network} → mobilises → {Collective_Behaviour} Semantical explanation of collective_Behaviour_ID000008: Collective behaviour encompasses activities of people and social groups that typically emerge spontaneously (such as crowds, riots, and so on) rather than arising from established processes of socialisation leading to conformity to social rules and norms. These behaviours often occur in response to a shared situation or stimulus and can involve large numbers of people acting in relatively unstructured ways. Examples of collective behaviour include panics, fads, rumors, social movements, and disasters. Sociologists study collective behaviour to understand the dynamics of group actions that are not governed by typical social structures or institutions. Factors such as anonymity, suggestibility, and the rapid spread of information can play a significant role in shaping collective behaviour.
The colonialism_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Colonial Economic Extraction' Causal relation: {Colonialism, Neo-colonialism} → exploits → {Exploitation_Theory, Underdevelopment} Semantical explanation of colonialism_ID000001: Colonialism is the maintenance of political, social, economic, and cultural dominance over a people by a foreign power for an extended period of time. This often involves the establishment of settlements and the exploitation of resources in the colonised territory for the benefit of the colonizing power. Colonialism has had a profound and lasting impact on the political, economic, and social structures of many regions around the world, leading to significant cultural changes and often resulting in inequalities and conflicts that persist even after the end of colonial rule. The motivations for colonialism have varied throughout history, including economic gain, political power, strategic advantage, and the spread of religious or cultural beliefs. The study of colonialism examines its historical roots, its various forms and impacts, and its enduring legacies in the contemporary world.
The conflict_Perspective_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Coordination and Conflict Resolution' Causal relation: {Negotiation, Conflict_Perspective} → coordinates → {Social_Movement, Social_Cohesion} Semantical explanation of conflict_Perspective_ID000001: The conflict perspective is a major sociological approach that assumes that social behaviour is best understood in terms of conflict or tension between competing groups over scarce resources. Unlike the functionalist perspective, which emphasises social harmony and stability, the conflict perspective highlights power struggles, inequality, and social change as inherent features of society. Key theorists associated with the conflict perspective include Karl Marx, who focused on class conflict, and Max Weber, who considered conflict arising from differences in class, status, and power. Contemporary conflict theorists examine various sources of social conflict, including those based on race, ethnicity, gender, age, and other forms of social inequality. This perspective views social institutions and social order as often reflecting the interests of the dominant groups in society.
The core_Country_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'World System Economic Integration' Causal relation: {World_System, Multinational_Corporation} → controls → {Core_Country, Peripheral_Country} Semantical explanation of core_Country_ID000001: According to world-systems theory, core countries are the most advanced industrial countries, which take the lion's share of profits in the world economic system. These nations possess high levels of industrialisation, technological innovation, and economic diversification. They typically have strong state institutions, well-developed infrastructure, and a highly skilled workforce. Core countries dominate global trade and finance, often exploiting peripheral and semi-peripheral countries for raw materials and cheap labor. Examples of core countries include the United States, Japan, and Germany. This dominance allows core countries to maintain their economic and political power in the global arena, perpetuating a system of unequal exchange. World-systems theory, developed by Immanuel Wallerstein, emphasises the interconnectedness of the global economy and the hierarchical relationship between core, semi-peripheral, and peripheral nations.
The corporate_Crime_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Corporate Crime and Organisational Deviance' Causal relation: {White-collar_Crime, Corporate_Crime} → influencesHistorically → {Economic_System, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of corporate_Crime_ID000001: Corporate crime refers to offences committed by large corporations in society in the pursuit of profit or to avoid losses. These crimes are often non-violent but can have significant social, environmental, and economic consequences. Examples of corporate crime include pollution of air and water, false advertising and deceptive marketing practices, violations of health and safety regulations in the workplace, financial fraud, and the production and sale of unsafe products. Unlike street crime, corporate crime is often more complex and difficult to detect and prosecute, as it may involve intricate financial transactions and decision-making processes within large organisations. The impact of corporate crime can be widespread, affecting consumers, employees, the environment, and the public trust in corporations and regulatory agencies.
The correlation_Coefficient_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Research Measurement' Causal relation: {Operational_Definition, Variable} → measures → {Correlation_Coefficient, Validity} Semantical explanation of correlation_Coefficient_ID000001: A correlation coefficient is a statistical measure of the degree of correlation between two variables, indicating the strength and direction of their linear relationship. The value of a correlation coefficient typically ranges from -1.0 to +1.0. A coefficient of +1.0 indicates a perfect positive correlation, meaning that as one variable increases, the other variable increases proportionally. A coefficient of -1.0 indicates a perfect negative correlation, meaning that as one variable increases, the other variable decreases proportionally. A coefficient of 0 indicates no linear correlation between the two variables. The closer the coefficient is to +1.0 or -1.0, the stronger the correlation; the closer it is to 0, the weaker the correlation. Correlation does not imply causation, meaning that just because two variables are correlated does not necessarily mean that one causes the other.
The crime_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Anomie and Social Disorganisation' Causal relation: {Anomie, Collective_Behaviour} → influencesHistorically → {Deviance, Crime} Semantical explanation of crime_ID000001: Crime is a violation of criminal law for which formal penalties are applied by some governmental authority. What constitutes a crime is defined by legal statutes at the local, state, or federal level, and these definitions can vary across jurisdictions and change over time. Crimes are typically classified based on their severity, ranging from minor offenses (misdemeanors) to serious felonies. The criminal justice system, including law enforcement agencies, courts, and correctional institutions, is responsible for enforcing criminal laws, apprehending offenders, and administering penalties, which can include fines, probation, imprisonment, or, in some cases, capital punishment. Sociologists study crime from various perspectives, examining its social causes, patterns, and consequences, as well as the functioning of the criminal justice system and its impact on society.
The crime_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Criminal Justice Punishment' Causal relation: {Capital_Punishment, Formal_Social_Control} → sanctions → {Crime, Rehabilitation} Semantical explanation of crime_ID000002: Crime is a violation of criminal law for which formal penalties are applied by some governmental authority. What constitutes a crime is defined by legal statutes at the local, state, or federal level, and these definitions can vary across jurisdictions and change over time. Crimes are typically classified based on their severity, ranging from minor offenses (misdemeanors) to serious felonies. The criminal justice system, including law enforcement agencies, courts, and correctional institutions, is responsible for enforcing criminal laws, apprehending offenders, and administering penalties, which can include fines, probation, imprisonment, or, in some cases, capital punishment. Sociologists study crime from various perspectives, examining its social causes, patterns, and consequences, as well as the functioning of the criminal justice system and its impact on society.
The crime_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Legal Social Control Process' Causal relation: {Law, Formal_Social_Control} → regulates → {Crime, Deviance} Semantical explanation of crime_ID000003: Crime is a violation of criminal law for which formal penalties are applied by some governmental authority. What constitutes a crime is defined by legal statutes at the local, state, or federal level, and these definitions can vary across jurisdictions and change over time. Crimes are typically classified based on their severity, ranging from minor offenses (misdemeanors) to serious felonies. The criminal justice system, including law enforcement agencies, courts, and correctional institutions, is responsible for enforcing criminal laws, apprehending offenders, and administering penalties, which can include fines, probation, imprisonment, or, in some cases, capital punishment. Sociologists study crime from various perspectives, examining its social causes, patterns, and consequences, as well as the functioning of the criminal justice system and its impact on society.
The crime_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media and Crime Perception' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Crime} → influencesHistorically → {Social_Control, Deviance} Semantical explanation of crime_ID000004: Crime is a violation of criminal law for which formal penalties are applied by some governmental authority. What constitutes a crime is defined by legal statutes at the local, state, or federal level, and these definitions can vary across jurisdictions and change over time. Crimes are typically classified based on their severity, ranging from minor offenses (misdemeanors) to serious felonies. The criminal justice system, including law enforcement agencies, courts, and correctional institutions, is responsible for enforcing criminal laws, apprehending offenders, and administering penalties, which can include fines, probation, imprisonment, or, in some cases, capital punishment. Sociologists study crime from various perspectives, examining its social causes, patterns, and consequences, as well as the functioning of the criminal justice system and its impact on society.
The crime_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Poverty and Social Disadvantage' Causal relation: {Poverty, Underdevelopment} → causallyInfluencedBy → {Crime, Health} Semantical explanation of crime_ID000005: Crime is a violation of criminal law for which formal penalties are applied by some governmental authority. What constitutes a crime is defined by legal statutes at the local, state, or federal level, and these definitions can vary across jurisdictions and change over time. Crimes are typically classified based on their severity, ranging from minor offenses (misdemeanors) to serious felonies. The criminal justice system, including law enforcement agencies, courts, and correctional institutions, is responsible for enforcing criminal laws, apprehending offenders, and administering penalties, which can include fines, probation, imprisonment, or, in some cases, capital punishment. Sociologists study crime from various perspectives, examining its social causes, patterns, and consequences, as well as the functioning of the criminal justice system and its impact on society.
The crime_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Rehabilitation and Social Reintegration' Causal relation: {Rehabilitation, Capital_Punishment} → influencesHistorically → {Crime, Social_Control} Semantical explanation of crime_ID000006: Crime is a violation of criminal law for which formal penalties are applied by some governmental authority. What constitutes a crime is defined by legal statutes at the local, state, or federal level, and these definitions can vary across jurisdictions and change over time. Crimes are typically classified based on their severity, ranging from minor offenses (misdemeanors) to serious felonies. The criminal justice system, including law enforcement agencies, courts, and correctional institutions, is responsible for enforcing criminal laws, apprehending offenders, and administering penalties, which can include fines, probation, imprisonment, or, in some cases, capital punishment. Sociologists study crime from various perspectives, examining its social causes, patterns, and consequences, as well as the functioning of the criminal justice system and its impact on society.
The crime_ID000007 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Control and Crime Prevention' Causal relation: {Law, Social_Control} → controls → {Crime, Formal_Social_Control} Semantical explanation of crime_ID000007: Crime is a violation of criminal law for which formal penalties are applied by some governmental authority. What constitutes a crime is defined by legal statutes at the local, state, or federal level, and these definitions can vary across jurisdictions and change over time. Crimes are typically classified based on their severity, ranging from minor offenses (misdemeanors) to serious felonies. The criminal justice system, including law enforcement agencies, courts, and correctional institutions, is responsible for enforcing criminal laws, apprehending offenders, and administering penalties, which can include fines, probation, imprisonment, or, in some cases, capital punishment. Sociologists study crime from various perspectives, examining its social causes, patterns, and consequences, as well as the functioning of the criminal justice system and its impact on society.
The crime_ID000008 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Control and Normative Regulation' Causal relation: {Social_Control, Law} → regulates → {Deviance, Crime} Semantical explanation of crime_ID000008: Crime is a violation of criminal law for which formal penalties are applied by some governmental authority. What constitutes a crime is defined by legal statutes at the local, state, or federal level, and these definitions can vary across jurisdictions and change over time. Crimes are typically classified based on their severity, ranging from minor offenses (misdemeanors) to serious felonies. The criminal justice system, including law enforcement agencies, courts, and correctional institutions, is responsible for enforcing criminal laws, apprehending offenders, and administering penalties, which can include fines, probation, imprisonment, or, in some cases, capital punishment. Sociologists study crime from various perspectives, examining its social causes, patterns, and consequences, as well as the functioning of the criminal justice system and its impact on society.
The cultural_Capital_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Diffusion and Social Innovation' Causal relation: {Diffusion, Cultural_Capital} → hasInfluence → {Innovation, Social_Change} Semantical explanation of cultural_Capital_ID000001: Cultural capital, a concept developed by sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, refers to the types of knowledge, skills, education, and other cultural resources that confer advantages on those who acquire them, providing them with social mobility and status within a society. Bourdieu identified three forms of cultural capital: embodied, objectified, and institutionalised. Embodied cultural capital exists in the form of knowledge and skills that are consciously acquired and passively inherited, such as language proficiency, manners, tastes, and dispositions. These are often learned through socialisation within a particular social class or cultural environment. Objectified cultural capital refers to cultural goods such as books, artworks, musical instruments, and other material objects that can be owned and transmitted. However, the possession of these objects is not sufficient; one must also have the cultural competence to understand and appreciate them to fully benefit from this form of capital. Institutionalised cultural capital consists of academic credentials, professional qualifications, and other forms of formal recognition that legitimate an individual's cultural competence and confer social advantages in the labor market and other social institutions. Cultural capital plays a significant role in social reproduction, as individuals from privileged backgrounds often possess more cultural capital, which helps them succeed in educational systems and gain access to higher-status occupations, thereby perpetuating social inequalities across generations.
The cultural_Capital_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Reproduction and Social Inequality' Causal relation: {Cultural_Capital, Family} → reproduces → {Social_Class, Social_Mobility} Semantical explanation of cultural_Capital_ID000002: Cultural capital, a concept developed by sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, refers to the types of knowledge, skills, education, and other cultural resources that confer advantages on those who acquire them, providing them with social mobility and status within a society. Bourdieu identified three forms of cultural capital: embodied, objectified, and institutionalised. Embodied cultural capital exists in the form of knowledge and skills that are consciously acquired and passively inherited, such as language proficiency, manners, tastes, and dispositions. These are often learned through socialisation within a particular social class or cultural environment. Objectified cultural capital refers to cultural goods such as books, artworks, musical instruments, and other material objects that can be owned and transmitted. However, the possession of these objects is not sufficient; one must also have the cultural competence to understand and appreciate them to fully benefit from this form of capital. Institutionalised cultural capital consists of academic credentials, professional qualifications, and other forms of formal recognition that legitimate an individual's cultural competence and confer social advantages in the labor market and other social institutions. Cultural capital plays a significant role in social reproduction, as individuals from privileged backgrounds often possess more cultural capital, which helps them succeed in educational systems and gain access to higher-status occupations, thereby perpetuating social inequalities across generations.
The cultural_Capital_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Transmission Processes' Causal relation: {Cultural_Transmission, Education} → transmits → {Culture, Cultural_Capital} Semantical explanation of cultural_Capital_ID000003: Cultural capital, a concept developed by sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, refers to the types of knowledge, skills, education, and other cultural resources that confer advantages on those who acquire them, providing them with social mobility and status within a society. Bourdieu identified three forms of cultural capital: embodied, objectified, and institutionalised. Embodied cultural capital exists in the form of knowledge and skills that are consciously acquired and passively inherited, such as language proficiency, manners, tastes, and dispositions. These are often learned through socialisation within a particular social class or cultural environment. Objectified cultural capital refers to cultural goods such as books, artworks, musical instruments, and other material objects that can be owned and transmitted. However, the possession of these objects is not sufficient; one must also have the cultural competence to understand and appreciate them to fully benefit from this form of capital. Institutionalised cultural capital consists of academic credentials, professional qualifications, and other forms of formal recognition that legitimate an individual's cultural competence and confer social advantages in the labor market and other social institutions. Cultural capital plays a significant role in social reproduction, as individuals from privileged backgrounds often possess more cultural capital, which helps them succeed in educational systems and gain access to higher-status occupations, thereby perpetuating social inequalities across generations.
The cultural_Capital_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Stratification Process' Causal relation: {Education, Cultural_Capital} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification, Class_System} Semantical explanation of cultural_Capital_ID000004: Cultural capital, a concept developed by sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, refers to the types of knowledge, skills, education, and other cultural resources that confer advantages on those who acquire them, providing them with social mobility and status within a society. Bourdieu identified three forms of cultural capital: embodied, objectified, and institutionalised. Embodied cultural capital exists in the form of knowledge and skills that are consciously acquired and passively inherited, such as language proficiency, manners, tastes, and dispositions. These are often learned through socialisation within a particular social class or cultural environment. Objectified cultural capital refers to cultural goods such as books, artworks, musical instruments, and other material objects that can be owned and transmitted. However, the possession of these objects is not sufficient; one must also have the cultural competence to understand and appreciate them to fully benefit from this form of capital. Institutionalised cultural capital consists of academic credentials, professional qualifications, and other forms of formal recognition that legitimate an individual's cultural competence and confer social advantages in the labor market and other social institutions. Cultural capital plays a significant role in social reproduction, as individuals from privileged backgrounds often possess more cultural capital, which helps them succeed in educational systems and gain access to higher-status occupations, thereby perpetuating social inequalities across generations.
The cultural_Capital_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Systems and Social Mobility' Causal relation: {Education, Cultural_Capital} → educates → {Social_Mobility, Social_Class} Semantical explanation of cultural_Capital_ID000005: Cultural capital, a concept developed by sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, refers to the types of knowledge, skills, education, and other cultural resources that confer advantages on those who acquire them, providing them with social mobility and status within a society. Bourdieu identified three forms of cultural capital: embodied, objectified, and institutionalised. Embodied cultural capital exists in the form of knowledge and skills that are consciously acquired and passively inherited, such as language proficiency, manners, tastes, and dispositions. These are often learned through socialisation within a particular social class or cultural environment. Objectified cultural capital refers to cultural goods such as books, artworks, musical instruments, and other material objects that can be owned and transmitted. However, the possession of these objects is not sufficient; one must also have the cultural competence to understand and appreciate them to fully benefit from this form of capital. Institutionalised cultural capital consists of academic credentials, professional qualifications, and other forms of formal recognition that legitimate an individual's cultural competence and confer social advantages in the labor market and other social institutions. Cultural capital plays a significant role in social reproduction, as individuals from privileged backgrounds often possess more cultural capital, which helps them succeed in educational systems and gain access to higher-status occupations, thereby perpetuating social inequalities across generations.
The cultural_Capital_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Formal Educational Socialisation' Causal relation: {Education, Hidden_Curriculum} → educates → {Secondary_Socialisation, Cultural_Capital} Semantical explanation of cultural_Capital_ID000006: Cultural capital, a concept developed by sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, refers to the types of knowledge, skills, education, and other cultural resources that confer advantages on those who acquire them, providing them with social mobility and status within a society. Bourdieu identified three forms of cultural capital: embodied, objectified, and institutionalised. Embodied cultural capital exists in the form of knowledge and skills that are consciously acquired and passively inherited, such as language proficiency, manners, tastes, and dispositions. These are often learned through socialisation within a particular social class or cultural environment. Objectified cultural capital refers to cultural goods such as books, artworks, musical instruments, and other material objects that can be owned and transmitted. However, the possession of these objects is not sufficient; one must also have the cultural competence to understand and appreciate them to fully benefit from this form of capital. Institutionalised cultural capital consists of academic credentials, professional qualifications, and other forms of formal recognition that legitimate an individual's cultural competence and confer social advantages in the labor market and other social institutions. Cultural capital plays a significant role in social reproduction, as individuals from privileged backgrounds often possess more cultural capital, which helps them succeed in educational systems and gain access to higher-status occupations, thereby perpetuating social inequalities across generations.
The cultural_Capital_ID000007 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Higher Education Stratification' Causal relation: {Education, Cultural_Capital} → educates → {Social_Class, Social_Stratification} Semantical explanation of cultural_Capital_ID000007: Cultural capital, a concept developed by sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, refers to the types of knowledge, skills, education, and other cultural resources that confer advantages on those who acquire them, providing them with social mobility and status within a society. Bourdieu identified three forms of cultural capital: embodied, objectified, and institutionalised. Embodied cultural capital exists in the form of knowledge and skills that are consciously acquired and passively inherited, such as language proficiency, manners, tastes, and dispositions. These are often learned through socialisation within a particular social class or cultural environment. Objectified cultural capital refers to cultural goods such as books, artworks, musical instruments, and other material objects that can be owned and transmitted. However, the possession of these objects is not sufficient; one must also have the cultural competence to understand and appreciate them to fully benefit from this form of capital. Institutionalised cultural capital consists of academic credentials, professional qualifications, and other forms of formal recognition that legitimate an individual's cultural competence and confer social advantages in the labor market and other social institutions. Cultural capital plays a significant role in social reproduction, as individuals from privileged backgrounds often possess more cultural capital, which helps them succeed in educational systems and gain access to higher-status occupations, thereby perpetuating social inequalities across generations.
The cultural_Capital_ID000008 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Reproduction Processes' Causal relation: {Cultural_Reproduction, Education} → reproduces → {Social_Class, Cultural_Capital} Semantical explanation of cultural_Capital_ID000008: Cultural capital, a concept developed by sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, refers to the types of knowledge, skills, education, and other cultural resources that confer advantages on those who acquire them, providing them with social mobility and status within a society. Bourdieu identified three forms of cultural capital: embodied, objectified, and institutionalised. Embodied cultural capital exists in the form of knowledge and skills that are consciously acquired and passively inherited, such as language proficiency, manners, tastes, and dispositions. These are often learned through socialisation within a particular social class or cultural environment. Objectified cultural capital refers to cultural goods such as books, artworks, musical instruments, and other material objects that can be owned and transmitted. However, the possession of these objects is not sufficient; one must also have the cultural competence to understand and appreciate them to fully benefit from this form of capital. Institutionalised cultural capital consists of academic credentials, professional qualifications, and other forms of formal recognition that legitimate an individual's cultural competence and confer social advantages in the labor market and other social institutions. Cultural capital plays a significant role in social reproduction, as individuals from privileged backgrounds often possess more cultural capital, which helps them succeed in educational systems and gain access to higher-status occupations, thereby perpetuating social inequalities across generations.
The cultural_Diversity_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Integration and Labor Migration' Causal relation: {Economic_System, Economic_Interdependence} → influencesHistorically → {Migration, Cultural_Diversity} Semantical explanation of cultural_Diversity_ID000001: Cultural Diversity refers to the variety and richness of different cultures, subcultures, and ethnic groups that coexist within a given society or across the globe. It encompasses the wide array of unique values, norms, beliefs, languages, customs, traditions, social practices, and forms of expression that distinguish these groups from one another. This diversity contributes to the multifaceted nature of human society, reflecting the myriad ways in which people organise their lives, understand the world, and express themselves. Cultural diversity is often celebrated for enriching society by fostering innovation, creativity, a broader range of perspectives, and a more vibrant cultural landscape, thereby enhancing cultural vitality and mutual understanding. However, it can also present challenges related to social cohesion, intergroup relations, and potential conflicts arising from differing values, competing interests, or the historical legacies of power imbalances and discrimination. Sociologists study cultural diversity to understand how different groups maintain their distinct identities while interacting within a larger social framework, and how societies manage diversity to promote inclusion, equality, and social harmony, moving beyond assimilationist models towards valuing cultural pluralism and multiculturalism, and addressing issues like prejudice and segregation.
The cultural_Diversity_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Immigration and Cultural Integration' Causal relation: {Immigration, Cultural_Diversity} → influencesHistorically → {Cultural_Pluralism, Culture_Shock} Semantical explanation of cultural_Diversity_ID000002: Cultural Diversity refers to the variety and richness of different cultures, subcultures, and ethnic groups that coexist within a given society or across the globe. It encompasses the wide array of unique values, norms, beliefs, languages, customs, traditions, social practices, and forms of expression that distinguish these groups from one another. This diversity contributes to the multifaceted nature of human society, reflecting the myriad ways in which people organise their lives, understand the world, and express themselves. Cultural diversity is often celebrated for enriching society by fostering innovation, creativity, a broader range of perspectives, and a more vibrant cultural landscape, thereby enhancing cultural vitality and mutual understanding. However, it can also present challenges related to social cohesion, intergroup relations, and potential conflicts arising from differing values, competing interests, or the historical legacies of power imbalances and discrimination. Sociologists study cultural diversity to understand how different groups maintain their distinct identities while interacting within a larger social framework, and how societies manage diversity to promote inclusion, equality, and social harmony, moving beyond assimilationist models towards valuing cultural pluralism and multiculturalism, and addressing issues like prejudice and segregation.
The cultural_Diversity_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Migration and Urban Diversity' Causal relation: {Migration, Population} → influencesHistorically → {Urbanism, Cultural_Diversity} Semantical explanation of cultural_Diversity_ID000003: Cultural Diversity refers to the variety and richness of different cultures, subcultures, and ethnic groups that coexist within a given society or across the globe. It encompasses the wide array of unique values, norms, beliefs, languages, customs, traditions, social practices, and forms of expression that distinguish these groups from one another. This diversity contributes to the multifaceted nature of human society, reflecting the myriad ways in which people organise their lives, understand the world, and express themselves. Cultural diversity is often celebrated for enriching society by fostering innovation, creativity, a broader range of perspectives, and a more vibrant cultural landscape, thereby enhancing cultural vitality and mutual understanding. However, it can also present challenges related to social cohesion, intergroup relations, and potential conflicts arising from differing values, competing interests, or the historical legacies of power imbalances and discrimination. Sociologists study cultural diversity to understand how different groups maintain their distinct identities while interacting within a larger social framework, and how societies manage diversity to promote inclusion, equality, and social harmony, moving beyond assimilationist models towards valuing cultural pluralism and multiculturalism, and addressing issues like prejudice and segregation.
The cultural_Pluralism_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Immigration and Cultural Integration' Causal relation: {Immigration, Cultural_Diversity} → influencesHistorically → {Cultural_Pluralism, Culture_Shock} Semantical explanation of cultural_Pluralism_ID000001: Cultural pluralism refers to the coexistence of several subcultures within a given society on equal terms, where no single culture dominates and all are recognised and respected for their distinct contributions. In a culturally pluralistic society, different ethnic, racial, religious, and other cultural groups are able to maintain their unique identities, traditions, and practices while participating fully in the broader society. This is often contrasted with assimilation, where minority groups are expected to adopt the culture of the dominant group. Cultural pluralism emphasises the value of diversity and the benefits of having a society enriched by multiple perspectives and traditions. It requires a degree of tolerance and mutual respect among different cultural groups and often involves policies and practices that protect the rights and promote the inclusion of all cultural groups within the society. The concept of a "salad bowl" is often used as a metaphor for cultural pluralism, where different ingredients (cultures) are mixed together but retain their individual flavors and characteristics, rather than being completely blended into a single entity like in a "melting pot" (often used to describe amalgamation).
The cultural_Pluralism_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Technological Influence and Social Adaptation' Causal relation: {Innovation, Cultural_Pluralism} → hasInfluence → {Social_Change, Modernisation} Semantical explanation of cultural_Pluralism_ID000002: Cultural pluralism refers to the coexistence of several subcultures within a given society on equal terms, where no single culture dominates and all are recognised and respected for their distinct contributions. In a culturally pluralistic society, different ethnic, racial, religious, and other cultural groups are able to maintain their unique identities, traditions, and practices while participating fully in the broader society. This is often contrasted with assimilation, where minority groups are expected to adopt the culture of the dominant group. Cultural pluralism emphasises the value of diversity and the benefits of having a society enriched by multiple perspectives and traditions. It requires a degree of tolerance and mutual respect among different cultural groups and often involves policies and practices that protect the rights and promote the inclusion of all cultural groups within the society. The concept of a "salad bowl" is often used as a metaphor for cultural pluralism, where different ingredients (cultures) are mixed together but retain their individual flavors and characteristics, rather than being completely blended into a single entity like in a "melting pot" (often used to describe amalgamation).
The cultural_Relativism_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Ethnographic Research Methods' Causal relation: {Ethnography, Participant_Observation} → observes → {Qualitative_Research, Cultural_Relativism} Semantical explanation of cultural_Relativism_ID000001: Cultural relativism is a principle in social science that emphasises the viewing of people's behaviour from the perspective of their own culture, rather than judging it based on the standards of another culture. It suggests that different cultures have different norms, values, beliefs, and practices that are meaningful and functional within their own context. Therefore, to understand and analyse human behaviour, it is essential to consider the cultural framework in which it occurs. Cultural relativism encourages an attitude of openness and understanding towards cultural differences, helping to avoid ethnocentrism, which is the tendency to view one's own culture as superior and to judge other cultures based on one's own cultural norms. While cultural relativism is important for promoting cross-cultural understanding and tolerance, it does not necessarily imply that all cultural practices are equally acceptable or morally justifiable. Sociologists often use cultural relativism as a methodological tool to study and describe different cultures without imposing their own cultural biases.
The cultural_Reproduction_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Social Reproduction' Causal relation: {Education, Hidden_Curriculum} → reproduces → {Cultural_Reproduction, Social_Class} Semantical explanation of cultural_Reproduction_ID000001: Cultural reproduction refers to the process by which a society transmits dominant knowledge, values, beliefs, and social inequalities from one generation to another. This transmission occurs through various social institutions, including the family, education system, media, and religion. Cultural reproduction theory, particularly associated with the work of Pierre Bourdieu and Basil Bernstein, highlights how the dominant culture in a society tends to be perpetuated, often reinforcing existing power structures and social hierarchies. For example, the education system may prioritise certain forms of knowledge and cultural capital that are more readily accessible to children from privileged backgrounds, thereby contributing to their continued success and the reproduction of social class differences across generations. Similarly, the media can play a role in shaping and reinforcing dominant ideologies and cultural norms. Understanding cultural reproduction helps sociologists analyse how social inequalities are maintained and transmitted over time, even in the absence of overt discrimination.
The cultural_Reproduction_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Socialisation and Cultural Reproduction' Causal relation: {Education, Family} → socialises → {Socialisation, Cultural_Reproduction} Semantical explanation of cultural_Reproduction_ID000002: Cultural reproduction refers to the process by which a society transmits dominant knowledge, values, beliefs, and social inequalities from one generation to another. This transmission occurs through various social institutions, including the family, education system, media, and religion. Cultural reproduction theory, particularly associated with the work of Pierre Bourdieu and Basil Bernstein, highlights how the dominant culture in a society tends to be perpetuated, often reinforcing existing power structures and social hierarchies. For example, the education system may prioritise certain forms of knowledge and cultural capital that are more readily accessible to children from privileged backgrounds, thereby contributing to their continued success and the reproduction of social class differences across generations. Similarly, the media can play a role in shaping and reinforcing dominant ideologies and cultural norms. Understanding cultural reproduction helps sociologists analyse how social inequalities are maintained and transmitted over time, even in the absence of overt discrimination.
The cultural_Reproduction_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Family Reproduces Culture' Causal relation: {Family} → reproduces → {Cultural_Reproduction} Semantical explanation of cultural_Reproduction_ID000003: Cultural reproduction refers to the process by which a society transmits dominant knowledge, values, beliefs, and social inequalities from one generation to another. This transmission occurs through various social institutions, including the family, education system, media, and religion. Cultural reproduction theory, particularly associated with the work of Pierre Bourdieu and Basil Bernstein, highlights how the dominant culture in a society tends to be perpetuated, often reinforcing existing power structures and social hierarchies. For example, the education system may prioritise certain forms of knowledge and cultural capital that are more readily accessible to children from privileged backgrounds, thereby contributing to their continued success and the reproduction of social class differences across generations. Similarly, the media can play a role in shaping and reinforcing dominant ideologies and cultural norms. Understanding cultural reproduction helps sociologists analyse how social inequalities are maintained and transmitted over time, even in the absence of overt discrimination.
The cultural_Reproduction_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Reproduction Processes' Causal relation: {Cultural_Reproduction, Education} → reproduces → {Social_Class, Cultural_Capital} Semantical explanation of cultural_Reproduction_ID000004: Cultural reproduction refers to the process by which a society transmits dominant knowledge, values, beliefs, and social inequalities from one generation to another. This transmission occurs through various social institutions, including the family, education system, media, and religion. Cultural reproduction theory, particularly associated with the work of Pierre Bourdieu and Basil Bernstein, highlights how the dominant culture in a society tends to be perpetuated, often reinforcing existing power structures and social hierarchies. For example, the education system may prioritise certain forms of knowledge and cultural capital that are more readily accessible to children from privileged backgrounds, thereby contributing to their continued success and the reproduction of social class differences across generations. Similarly, the media can play a role in shaping and reinforcing dominant ideologies and cultural norms. Understanding cultural reproduction helps sociologists analyse how social inequalities are maintained and transmitted over time, even in the absence of overt discrimination.
The cultural_Transmission_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Transmission Processes' Causal relation: {Cultural_Transmission, Education} → transmits → {Culture, Cultural_Capital} Semantical explanation of cultural_Transmission_ID000001: Cultural transmission is the process by which one generation passes culture to the next, ensuring the continuity of societal norms, values, beliefs, traditions, and practices. This process occurs through various mechanisms, including socialisation within the family, formal education in schools, informal learning from peers and community members, and exposure to media and cultural products. Language is a fundamental tool for cultural transmission, allowing for the communication of knowledge, history, and cultural values across generations. Traditions, rituals, and storytelling also play important roles in passing down cultural heritage. Cultural transmission is essential for the survival and development of societies, as it enables each new generation to learn from the experiences and knowledge of those who came before them, contributing to social stability and cultural evolution. The effectiveness of cultural transmission can influence the rate and direction of cultural change within a society.
The cultural_Transmission_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Intergenerational Cultural Transmission' Causal relation: {Cultural_Transmission, Language} → preserves → {Culture, Value} Semantical explanation of cultural_Transmission_ID000002: Cultural transmission is the process by which one generation passes culture to the next, ensuring the continuity of societal norms, values, beliefs, traditions, and practices. This process occurs through various mechanisms, including socialisation within the family, formal education in schools, informal learning from peers and community members, and exposure to media and cultural products. Language is a fundamental tool for cultural transmission, allowing for the communication of knowledge, history, and cultural values across generations. Traditions, rituals, and storytelling also play important roles in passing down cultural heritage. Cultural transmission is essential for the survival and development of societies, as it enables each new generation to learn from the experiences and knowledge of those who came before them, contributing to social stability and cultural evolution. The effectiveness of cultural transmission can influence the rate and direction of cultural change within a society.
The cultural_Transmission_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Intergenerational Cultural Transmission' Causal relation: {Primary_Socialisation, Family} → transmits → {Cultural_Transmission, Value} Semantical explanation of cultural_Transmission_ID000003: Cultural transmission is the process by which one generation passes culture to the next, ensuring the continuity of societal norms, values, beliefs, traditions, and practices. This process occurs through various mechanisms, including socialisation within the family, formal education in schools, informal learning from peers and community members, and exposure to media and cultural products. Language is a fundamental tool for cultural transmission, allowing for the communication of knowledge, history, and cultural values across generations. Traditions, rituals, and storytelling also play important roles in passing down cultural heritage. Cultural transmission is essential for the survival and development of societies, as it enables each new generation to learn from the experiences and knowledge of those who came before them, contributing to social stability and cultural evolution. The effectiveness of cultural transmission can influence the rate and direction of cultural change within a society.
The culture_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Hegemony Establishment' Causal relation: {Hegemony, Power_Elite} → controls → {Culture, Mass_Media} Semantical explanation of culture_ID000001: Culture encompasses the values, beliefs, ceremonies, ways of life, norms, symbols, and material goods characteristic of a given group or society. Like the concept of society, the notion of culture is very widely used in sociology, as well as in other social sciences, particularly anthropology. Culture is one of the most distinctive properties of human social association, differentiating human societies from animal societies in its complexity and transmission through learning rather than solely through instinct. It includes everything that is learned and shared by the members of a society, shaping their behaviour and their understanding of the world. Culture can be broadly divided into material culture, which includes tangible objects created by a society (such as tools, technology, clothing, and art), and nonmaterial culture, which includes intangible aspects such as ideas, values, beliefs, norms, language, and social institutions. Culture provides a framework for social interaction, defines what is considered acceptable and unacceptable behaviour, and gives meaning to people's lives. It is dynamic and constantly evolving through processes of innovation, diffusion, and adaptation.
The culture_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Influence and Identity Formation' Causal relation: {Culture, Value} → hasInfluence → {Identity, Social_Role} Semantical explanation of culture_ID000002: Culture encompasses the values, beliefs, ceremonies, ways of life, norms, symbols, and material goods characteristic of a given group or society. Like the concept of society, the notion of culture is very widely used in sociology, as well as in other social sciences, particularly anthropology. Culture is one of the most distinctive properties of human social association, differentiating human societies from animal societies in its complexity and transmission through learning rather than solely through instinct. It includes everything that is learned and shared by the members of a society, shaping their behaviour and their understanding of the world. Culture can be broadly divided into material culture, which includes tangible objects created by a society (such as tools, technology, clothing, and art), and nonmaterial culture, which includes intangible aspects such as ideas, values, beliefs, norms, language, and social institutions. Culture provides a framework for social interaction, defines what is considered acceptable and unacceptable behaviour, and gives meaning to people's lives. It is dynamic and constantly evolving through processes of innovation, diffusion, and adaptation.
The culture_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Influence and Social Change' Causal relation: {Culture, Value} → hasInfluence → {Social_Change, Social_Structure} Semantical explanation of culture_ID000003: Culture encompasses the values, beliefs, ceremonies, ways of life, norms, symbols, and material goods characteristic of a given group or society. Like the concept of society, the notion of culture is very widely used in sociology, as well as in other social sciences, particularly anthropology. Culture is one of the most distinctive properties of human social association, differentiating human societies from animal societies in its complexity and transmission through learning rather than solely through instinct. It includes everything that is learned and shared by the members of a society, shaping their behaviour and their understanding of the world. Culture can be broadly divided into material culture, which includes tangible objects created by a society (such as tools, technology, clothing, and art), and nonmaterial culture, which includes intangible aspects such as ideas, values, beliefs, norms, language, and social institutions. Culture provides a framework for social interaction, defines what is considered acceptable and unacceptable behaviour, and gives meaning to people's lives. It is dynamic and constantly evolving through processes of innovation, diffusion, and adaptation.
The culture_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Transmission Processes' Causal relation: {Cultural_Transmission, Education} → transmits → {Culture, Cultural_Capital} Semantical explanation of culture_ID000004: Culture encompasses the values, beliefs, ceremonies, ways of life, norms, symbols, and material goods characteristic of a given group or society. Like the concept of society, the notion of culture is very widely used in sociology, as well as in other social sciences, particularly anthropology. Culture is one of the most distinctive properties of human social association, differentiating human societies from animal societies in its complexity and transmission through learning rather than solely through instinct. It includes everything that is learned and shared by the members of a society, shaping their behaviour and their understanding of the world. Culture can be broadly divided into material culture, which includes tangible objects created by a society (such as tools, technology, clothing, and art), and nonmaterial culture, which includes intangible aspects such as ideas, values, beliefs, norms, language, and social institutions. Culture provides a framework for social interaction, defines what is considered acceptable and unacceptable behaviour, and gives meaning to people's lives. It is dynamic and constantly evolving through processes of innovation, diffusion, and adaptation.
The culture_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Culture Influences Behaviour' Causal relation: {Culture} → hasInfluence → {Social_Change} Semantical explanation of culture_ID000005: Culture encompasses the values, beliefs, ceremonies, ways of life, norms, symbols, and material goods characteristic of a given group or society. Like the concept of society, the notion of culture is very widely used in sociology, as well as in other social sciences, particularly anthropology. Culture is one of the most distinctive properties of human social association, differentiating human societies from animal societies in its complexity and transmission through learning rather than solely through instinct. It includes everything that is learned and shared by the members of a society, shaping their behaviour and their understanding of the world. Culture can be broadly divided into material culture, which includes tangible objects created by a society (such as tools, technology, clothing, and art), and nonmaterial culture, which includes intangible aspects such as ideas, values, beliefs, norms, language, and social institutions. Culture provides a framework for social interaction, defines what is considered acceptable and unacceptable behaviour, and gives meaning to people's lives. It is dynamic and constantly evolving through processes of innovation, diffusion, and adaptation.
The culture_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Global Influence and Cultural Exchange' Causal relation: {Global_Village, Internet} → hasInfluence → {Culture, Social_Change, Social_Role} Semantical explanation of culture_ID000006: Culture encompasses the values, beliefs, ceremonies, ways of life, norms, symbols, and material goods characteristic of a given group or society. Like the concept of society, the notion of culture is very widely used in sociology, as well as in other social sciences, particularly anthropology. Culture is one of the most distinctive properties of human social association, differentiating human societies from animal societies in its complexity and transmission through learning rather than solely through instinct. It includes everything that is learned and shared by the members of a society, shaping their behaviour and their understanding of the world. Culture can be broadly divided into material culture, which includes tangible objects created by a society (such as tools, technology, clothing, and art), and nonmaterial culture, which includes intangible aspects such as ideas, values, beliefs, norms, language, and social institutions. Culture provides a framework for social interaction, defines what is considered acceptable and unacceptable behaviour, and gives meaning to people's lives. It is dynamic and constantly evolving through processes of innovation, diffusion, and adaptation.
The culture_ID000007 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Intergenerational Cultural Transmission' Causal relation: {Cultural_Transmission, Language} → preserves → {Culture, Value} Semantical explanation of culture_ID000007: Culture encompasses the values, beliefs, ceremonies, ways of life, norms, symbols, and material goods characteristic of a given group or society. Like the concept of society, the notion of culture is very widely used in sociology, as well as in other social sciences, particularly anthropology. Culture is one of the most distinctive properties of human social association, differentiating human societies from animal societies in its complexity and transmission through learning rather than solely through instinct. It includes everything that is learned and shared by the members of a society, shaping their behaviour and their understanding of the world. Culture can be broadly divided into material culture, which includes tangible objects created by a society (such as tools, technology, clothing, and art), and nonmaterial culture, which includes intangible aspects such as ideas, values, beliefs, norms, language, and social institutions. Culture provides a framework for social interaction, defines what is considered acceptable and unacceptable behaviour, and gives meaning to people's lives. It is dynamic and constantly evolving through processes of innovation, diffusion, and adaptation.
The culture_ID000008 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media and Youth Cultural Influence' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Peer_Group, Youth_Culture} → hasInfluence → {Fashion, Culture} Semantical explanation of culture_ID000008: Culture encompasses the values, beliefs, ceremonies, ways of life, norms, symbols, and material goods characteristic of a given group or society. Like the concept of society, the notion of culture is very widely used in sociology, as well as in other social sciences, particularly anthropology. Culture is one of the most distinctive properties of human social association, differentiating human societies from animal societies in its complexity and transmission through learning rather than solely through instinct. It includes everything that is learned and shared by the members of a society, shaping their behaviour and their understanding of the world. Culture can be broadly divided into material culture, which includes tangible objects created by a society (such as tools, technology, clothing, and art), and nonmaterial culture, which includes intangible aspects such as ideas, values, beliefs, norms, language, and social institutions. Culture provides a framework for social interaction, defines what is considered acceptable and unacceptable behaviour, and gives meaning to people's lives. It is dynamic and constantly evolving through processes of innovation, diffusion, and adaptation.
The culture_ID000009 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Youth Mobilisation and Social Change' Causal relation: {Youth_Culture, Social_Movement} → mobilises → {Social_Change, Culture} Semantical explanation of culture_ID000009: Culture encompasses the values, beliefs, ceremonies, ways of life, norms, symbols, and material goods characteristic of a given group or society. Like the concept of society, the notion of culture is very widely used in sociology, as well as in other social sciences, particularly anthropology. Culture is one of the most distinctive properties of human social association, differentiating human societies from animal societies in its complexity and transmission through learning rather than solely through instinct. It includes everything that is learned and shared by the members of a society, shaping their behaviour and their understanding of the world. Culture can be broadly divided into material culture, which includes tangible objects created by a society (such as tools, technology, clothing, and art), and nonmaterial culture, which includes intangible aspects such as ideas, values, beliefs, norms, language, and social institutions. Culture provides a framework for social interaction, defines what is considered acceptable and unacceptable behaviour, and gives meaning to people's lives. It is dynamic and constantly evolving through processes of innovation, diffusion, and adaptation.
The culture_Shock_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Immigration and Cultural Integration' Causal relation: {Immigration, Cultural_Diversity} → influencesHistorically → {Cultural_Pluralism, Culture_Shock} Semantical explanation of culture_Shock_ID000001: Culture shock is the feeling of surprise and disorientation that is experienced when people witness cultural practices, values, norms, and beliefs that are significantly different from their own. This phenomenon typically occurs when individuals are immersed in a new and unfamiliar cultural environment, such as when traveling to a foreign country, moving to a different region within their own country with distinct cultural norms, or even when experiencing a significant change in social environment, like starting a new job with a very different organisational culture. The disorientation arises from the lack of familiar cues and expectations that guide behaviour in one's own culture, leading to feelings of uncertainty, anxiety, and sometimes even hostility towards the new cultural context. Culture shock can affect various aspects of daily life, including communication styles, social etiquette, food, customs, and even basic assumptions about how the world works. While often challenging, experiencing and overcoming culture shock can also lead to personal growth, increased cultural awareness, and a deeper understanding of both one's own culture and others. The process of adapting to a new culture involves learning new norms, values, and behaviours, and gradually adjusting one's own perspectives and practices to fit the new environment.
The cyberspace_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Digital Communication and Social Transformation' Causal relation: {Internet, Cyberspace} → digitalises → {Social_Interaction, Social_Cohesion} Semantical explanation of cyberspace_ID000001: Cyberspace refers to electronic networks of interaction between individuals at different computer terminals, linking people at a level – in a dimension – that has no regard for territorial boundaries or physical presence. It is a virtual realm created by interconnected computer networks, primarily the internet, where individuals can communicate, interact, and exchange information regardless of their physical location. Cyberspace encompasses a wide range of online activities, including social networking, email communication, online shopping, virtual gaming, and accessing information through the World Wide Web. The nature of cyberspace allows for the formation of online communities based on shared interests, identities, or goals, transcending geographical limitations. This virtual environment has become an increasingly significant space for social interaction, economic activity, and cultural exchange in modern society. The lack of physical presence and territorial boundaries in cyberspace raises unique social, ethical, and legal challenges related to issues such as privacy, security, and governance.
The cyberspace_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Digital Technology Social Transformation' Causal relation: {Internet, E-commerce} → digitalises → {Social_Change, Cyberspace} Semantical explanation of cyberspace_ID000002: Cyberspace refers to electronic networks of interaction between individuals at different computer terminals, linking people at a level – in a dimension – that has no regard for territorial boundaries or physical presence. It is a virtual realm created by interconnected computer networks, primarily the internet, where individuals can communicate, interact, and exchange information regardless of their physical location. Cyberspace encompasses a wide range of online activities, including social networking, email communication, online shopping, virtual gaming, and accessing information through the World Wide Web. The nature of cyberspace allows for the formation of online communities based on shared interests, identities, or goals, transcending geographical limitations. This virtual environment has become an increasingly significant space for social interaction, economic activity, and cultural exchange in modern society. The lack of physical presence and territorial boundaries in cyberspace raises unique social, ethical, and legal challenges related to issues such as privacy, security, and governance.
The defended_Neighborhood_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Racial Spatial Segregation' Causal relation: {Apartheid, Institutional_Discrimination} → segregates → {Segregation, Defended_Neighborhood} Semantical explanation of defended_Neighborhood_ID000001: A defended neighborhood is a neighborhood that residents identify through defined community borders and through a perception that adjacent areas are geographically separate and socially different. This concept highlights the social construction of neighborhood boundaries and the sense of territoriality and identity that residents develop in relation to their local area. Residents of a defended neighborhood often feel a strong sense of belonging and may actively work to maintain the perceived social and physical boundaries of their community, sometimes in response to perceived threats or differences from neighboring areas. This can involve social activities, community organisations, and even informal surveillance to reinforce the neighborhood's identity and distinctiveness. The concept of a defended neighborhood is relevant to understanding urban sociology, community studies, and issues related to social cohesion and inter-neighborhood relations. The perceived differences between a defended neighborhood and adjacent areas can be based on factors such as socioeconomic status, ethnicity, lifestyle, or levels of crime.
The defended_Neighborhood_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Spatial Social Organisation' Causal relation: {Suburb, Megalopolis} → inhabits → {Defended_Neighborhood, Squatter_Settlement} Semantical explanation of defended_Neighborhood_ID000002: A defended neighborhood is a neighborhood that residents identify through defined community borders and through a perception that adjacent areas are geographically separate and socially different. This concept highlights the social construction of neighborhood boundaries and the sense of territoriality and identity that residents develop in relation to their local area. Residents of a defended neighborhood often feel a strong sense of belonging and may actively work to maintain the perceived social and physical boundaries of their community, sometimes in response to perceived threats or differences from neighboring areas. This can involve social activities, community organisations, and even informal surveillance to reinforce the neighborhood's identity and distinctiveness. The concept of a defended neighborhood is relevant to understanding urban sociology, community studies, and issues related to social cohesion and inter-neighborhood relations. The perceived differences between a defended neighborhood and adjacent areas can be based on factors such as socioeconomic status, ethnicity, lifestyle, or levels of crime.
The degradation_Ceremony_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Resocialisation' Causal relation: {Total_Institution, Degradation_Ceremony} → resocialises → {Resocialisation, Identity} Semantical explanation of degradation_Ceremony_ID000001: A degradation ceremony is an aspect of the socialisation process within total institutions, such as prisons, military boot camps, and mental hospitals, in which people are subjected to humiliating rituals and procedures designed to strip away their existing identities and self-concepts. The purpose of these ceremonies is to break down the individual's sense of self and replace it with an identity that is more compliant with the rules and expectations of the institution. These rituals can involve public shaming, the confiscation of personal belongings, the assignment of dehumanizing labels, and the enforcement of strict rules and routines that leave little room for individual expression or autonomy. The degradation ceremony marks the individual's entry into the total institution and signals the beginning of their resocialisation into the institutional culture. By systematically undermining the individual's former identity, the institution aims to create a blank slate upon which a new, institutionally defined identity can be inscribed. This process is a key mechanism through which total institutions maintain control and order over their populations.
The deindustrialisation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Deindustrialisation and Urban Decline' Causal relation: {Deindustrialisation, Economic_System} → influencesHistorically → {Working_Class, Relative_Deprivation} Semantical explanation of deindustrialisation_ID000001: Deindustrialisation is the systematic, widespread withdrawal of investment in basic aspects of productivity such as factories and plants, leading to a decline in manufacturing and industrial activity in a region or country. This process is often accompanied by a shift towards a service-based economy, with a greater emphasis on sectors like finance, information technology, and healthcare. Deindustrialisation can be caused by various factors, including technological advancements that automate production, the globalisation of manufacturing leading to production moving to countries with lower labor costs, and a shift in consumer demand towards services rather than manufactured goods. While deindustrialisation can lead to economic restructuring and the emergence of new industries, it can also result in job losses in the manufacturing sector, economic hardship for affected communities, and increased social inequality if new opportunities are not readily available or accessible to all. The social and economic consequences of deindustrialisation have been a significant area of study in sociology, with researchers examining its impact on employment, social class, and community well-being.
The deindustrialisation_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Marginalisation Process' Causal relation: {Neoliberalism, Deindustrialisation} → marginalises → {Underground_Economy, Underclass} Semantical explanation of deindustrialisation_ID000002: Deindustrialisation is the systematic, widespread withdrawal of investment in basic aspects of productivity such as factories and plants, leading to a decline in manufacturing and industrial activity in a region or country. This process is often accompanied by a shift towards a service-based economy, with a greater emphasis on sectors like finance, information technology, and healthcare. Deindustrialisation can be caused by various factors, including technological advancements that automate production, the globalisation of manufacturing leading to production moving to countries with lower labor costs, and a shift in consumer demand towards services rather than manufactured goods. While deindustrialisation can lead to economic restructuring and the emergence of new industries, it can also result in job losses in the manufacturing sector, economic hardship for affected communities, and increased social inequality if new opportunities are not readily available or accessible to all. The social and economic consequences of deindustrialisation have been a significant area of study in sociology, with researchers examining its impact on employment, social class, and community well-being.
The democracy_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Democracy and Civic Participation' Causal relation: {Democracy, Politics} → influencesHistorically → {Social_Movement, Collective_Behaviour} Semantical explanation of democracy_ID000001: Democracy is a political system in which power is exercised by the people as a whole, either directly or through elected representatives. Key principles of democracy typically include free and fair elections, the rule of law, protection of individual rights and freedoms (such as freedom of speech, assembly, and the press), and the accountability of government to the people. Democratic systems can take various forms, such as parliamentary democracies, presidential democracies, and direct democracies, each with its own specific structures and processes for decision-making and governance. The concept of democracy is often associated with values such as equality, participation, and the consent of the governed. The spread and consolidation of democracy have been major themes in political sociology, with researchers studying the factors that contribute to the establishment and maintenance of democratic institutions around the world.
The democracy_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Democratic Political Governance' Causal relation: {Democracy, Representative_Democracy} → governs → {Political_System, Nation_State} Semantical explanation of democracy_ID000002: Democracy is a political system in which power is exercised by the people as a whole, either directly or through elected representatives. Key principles of democracy typically include free and fair elections, the rule of law, protection of individual rights and freedoms (such as freedom of speech, assembly, and the press), and the accountability of government to the people. Democratic systems can take various forms, such as parliamentary democracies, presidential democracies, and direct democracies, each with its own specific structures and processes for decision-making and governance. The concept of democracy is often associated with values such as equality, participation, and the consent of the governed. The spread and consolidation of democracy have been major themes in political sociology, with researchers studying the factors that contribute to the establishment and maintenance of democratic institutions around the world.
The democracy_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Democratic Political Participation' Causal relation: {Democracy, Liberal_Democracy} → participatesIn → {Politics, Representative_Democracy} Semantical explanation of democracy_ID000003: Democracy is a political system in which power is exercised by the people as a whole, either directly or through elected representatives. Key principles of democracy typically include free and fair elections, the rule of law, protection of individual rights and freedoms (such as freedom of speech, assembly, and the press), and the accountability of government to the people. Democratic systems can take various forms, such as parliamentary democracies, presidential democracies, and direct democracies, each with its own specific structures and processes for decision-making and governance. The concept of democracy is often associated with values such as equality, participation, and the consent of the governed. The spread and consolidation of democracy have been major themes in political sociology, with researchers studying the factors that contribute to the establishment and maintenance of democratic institutions around the world.
The democracy_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Interest Group Political Advocacy' Causal relation: {Interest_Group, Political_Action_Committee_(PAC)} → advocates → {Political_System, Democracy} Semantical explanation of democracy_ID000004: Democracy is a political system in which power is exercised by the people as a whole, either directly or through elected representatives. Key principles of democracy typically include free and fair elections, the rule of law, protection of individual rights and freedoms (such as freedom of speech, assembly, and the press), and the accountability of government to the people. Democratic systems can take various forms, such as parliamentary democracies, presidential democracies, and direct democracies, each with its own specific structures and processes for decision-making and governance. The concept of democracy is often associated with values such as equality, participation, and the consent of the governed. The spread and consolidation of democracy have been major themes in political sociology, with researchers studying the factors that contribute to the establishment and maintenance of democratic institutions around the world.
The democracy_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Political Mobilisation and Democratic Participation' Causal relation: {Interest_Group, Political_System} → mobilises → {Democracy, Politics} Semantical explanation of democracy_ID000005: Democracy is a political system in which power is exercised by the people as a whole, either directly or through elected representatives. Key principles of democracy typically include free and fair elections, the rule of law, protection of individual rights and freedoms (such as freedom of speech, assembly, and the press), and the accountability of government to the people. Democratic systems can take various forms, such as parliamentary democracies, presidential democracies, and direct democracies, each with its own specific structures and processes for decision-making and governance. The concept of democracy is often associated with values such as equality, participation, and the consent of the governed. The spread and consolidation of democracy have been major themes in political sociology, with researchers studying the factors that contribute to the establishment and maintenance of democratic institutions around the world.
The democracy_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Political Representation Process' Causal relation: {Representative_Democracy, Political_System} → represents → {Democracy, Participatory_Democracy} Semantical explanation of democracy_ID000006: Democracy is a political system in which power is exercised by the people as a whole, either directly or through elected representatives. Key principles of democracy typically include free and fair elections, the rule of law, protection of individual rights and freedoms (such as freedom of speech, assembly, and the press), and the accountability of government to the people. Democratic systems can take various forms, such as parliamentary democracies, presidential democracies, and direct democracies, each with its own specific structures and processes for decision-making and governance. The concept of democracy is often associated with values such as equality, participation, and the consent of the governed. The spread and consolidation of democracy have been major themes in political sociology, with researchers studying the factors that contribute to the establishment and maintenance of democratic institutions around the world.
The democracy_ID000007 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Movement Political Impact' Causal relation: {Social_Movement, New_Social_Movement} → hasInfluence → {Political_System, Democracy} Semantical explanation of democracy_ID000007: Democracy is a political system in which power is exercised by the people as a whole, either directly or through elected representatives. Key principles of democracy typically include free and fair elections, the rule of law, protection of individual rights and freedoms (such as freedom of speech, assembly, and the press), and the accountability of government to the people. Democratic systems can take various forms, such as parliamentary democracies, presidential democracies, and direct democracies, each with its own specific structures and processes for decision-making and governance. The concept of democracy is often associated with values such as equality, participation, and the consent of the governed. The spread and consolidation of democracy have been major themes in political sociology, with researchers studying the factors that contribute to the establishment and maintenance of democratic institutions around the world.
The demographic_Transition_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Rural-Urban Population Movement' Causal relation: {Urbanisation, Industrial_Society} → migrates → {Migration, Demographic_Transition} Semantical explanation of demographic_Transition_ID000001: Demographic transition is an interpretation of population change, which holds that a stable ratio of births to deaths is achieved once a certain level of economic prosperity and modernisation has been reached. This process involves a shift from high birth and death rates to low birth and death rates as a society develops economically and socially. The transition typically occurs in stages, as described in the demographic transition theory, moving from a period of high fertility and mortality to one of low fertility and mortality, with a period of rapid population growth in between when death rates decline before birth rates do. The end result is a stabilisation of the population at a new size, often larger than the pre-transition level, with a different age structure. Factors contributing to this transition include improvements in healthcare, sanitation, education, and changes in cultural norms and values related to family size. Understanding the demographic transition is crucial for analysing population trends, planning for resource allocation, and addressing social and economic challenges associated with population change.
The denomination_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Religious Institutionalisation' Causal relation: {Church, Denomination} → institutionalises → {Religious_Organisation, Religion} Semantical explanation of denomination_ID000001: A denomination is a large, organised religion that is not officially linked with the state or government, operating independently and typically accepting the existence of other religious groups within a pluralistic society. Unlike a state church, which is officially endorsed and supported by the government, a denomination maintains its own governance and financial autonomy. While denominations may have a significant presence and influence within a society, they do not hold a position of exclusive authority or official recognition by the state. They generally have a well-established history, a large membership base, and a formal organisational structure with defined doctrines and practices. The concept of denomination is particularly relevant in countries with a separation of church and state and a diverse religious landscape, such as the United States, where numerous Christian denominations, as well as other major religions, operate freely.
The deviance_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Anomie and Social Disorganisation' Causal relation: {Anomie, Collective_Behaviour} → influencesHistorically → {Deviance, Crime} Semantical explanation of deviance_ID000001: Deviance refers to behaviour that violates the standards of conduct or expectations of a group or society. What is considered deviant varies across cultures, social groups, and time periods, as it is defined by social norms and values. Deviant behaviour can range from minor infractions of social norms to serious violations of laws. Sociologists study deviance to understand why people violate norms, how societies react to deviance, and the role of deviance in social change. Various theories attempt to explain deviance, including anomie theory, differential association theory, control theory, and labeling theory. Deviance is not inherently negative; while some deviant acts are harmful, others can challenge existing norms and lead to social progress.
The deviance_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Deviance Marginalises Individuals' Causal relation: {Deviance} → marginalises → {Social_Exclusion} Semantical explanation of deviance_ID000002: Deviance refers to behaviour that violates the standards of conduct or expectations of a group or society. What is considered deviant varies across cultures, social groups, and time periods, as it is defined by social norms and values. Deviant behaviour can range from minor infractions of social norms to serious violations of laws. Sociologists study deviance to understand why people violate norms, how societies react to deviance, and the role of deviance in social change. Various theories attempt to explain deviance, including anomie theory, differential association theory, control theory, and labeling theory. Deviance is not inherently negative; while some deviant acts are harmful, others can challenge existing norms and lead to social progress.
The deviance_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Labeling and Deviant Identity Formation' Causal relation: {Labeling_Theory, Stigma} → stigmatises → {Deviance, Social_Exclusion} Semantical explanation of deviance_ID000003: Deviance refers to behaviour that violates the standards of conduct or expectations of a group or society. What is considered deviant varies across cultures, social groups, and time periods, as it is defined by social norms and values. Deviant behaviour can range from minor infractions of social norms to serious violations of laws. Sociologists study deviance to understand why people violate norms, how societies react to deviance, and the role of deviance in social change. Various theories attempt to explain deviance, including anomie theory, differential association theory, control theory, and labeling theory. Deviance is not inherently negative; while some deviant acts are harmful, others can challenge existing norms and lead to social progress.
The deviance_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Legal Social Control Process' Causal relation: {Law, Formal_Social_Control} → regulates → {Crime, Deviance} Semantical explanation of deviance_ID000004: Deviance refers to behaviour that violates the standards of conduct or expectations of a group or society. What is considered deviant varies across cultures, social groups, and time periods, as it is defined by social norms and values. Deviant behaviour can range from minor infractions of social norms to serious violations of laws. Sociologists study deviance to understand why people violate norms, how societies react to deviance, and the role of deviance in social change. Various theories attempt to explain deviance, including anomie theory, differential association theory, control theory, and labeling theory. Deviance is not inherently negative; while some deviant acts are harmful, others can challenge existing norms and lead to social progress.
The deviance_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media and Crime Perception' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Crime} → influencesHistorically → {Social_Control, Deviance} Semantical explanation of deviance_ID000005: Deviance refers to behaviour that violates the standards of conduct or expectations of a group or society. What is considered deviant varies across cultures, social groups, and time periods, as it is defined by social norms and values. Deviant behaviour can range from minor infractions of social norms to serious violations of laws. Sociologists study deviance to understand why people violate norms, how societies react to deviance, and the role of deviance in social change. Various theories attempt to explain deviance, including anomie theory, differential association theory, control theory, and labeling theory. Deviance is not inherently negative; while some deviant acts are harmful, others can challenge existing norms and lead to social progress.
The deviance_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Control and Deviance Prevention' Causal relation: {Social_Control, Formal_Social_Control} → controls → {Deviance, Informal_Social_Control} Semantical explanation of deviance_ID000006: Deviance refers to behaviour that violates the standards of conduct or expectations of a group or society. What is considered deviant varies across cultures, social groups, and time periods, as it is defined by social norms and values. Deviant behaviour can range from minor infractions of social norms to serious violations of laws. Sociologists study deviance to understand why people violate norms, how societies react to deviance, and the role of deviance in social change. Various theories attempt to explain deviance, including anomie theory, differential association theory, control theory, and labeling theory. Deviance is not inherently negative; while some deviant acts are harmful, others can challenge existing norms and lead to social progress.
The deviance_ID000007 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Control and Normative Regulation' Causal relation: {Social_Control, Law} → regulates → {Deviance, Crime} Semantical explanation of deviance_ID000007: Deviance refers to behaviour that violates the standards of conduct or expectations of a group or society. What is considered deviant varies across cultures, social groups, and time periods, as it is defined by social norms and values. Deviant behaviour can range from minor infractions of social norms to serious violations of laws. Sociologists study deviance to understand why people violate norms, how societies react to deviance, and the role of deviance in social change. Various theories attempt to explain deviance, including anomie theory, differential association theory, control theory, and labeling theory. Deviance is not inherently negative; while some deviant acts are harmful, others can challenge existing norms and lead to social progress.
The deviance_ID000008 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Control Regulates Behaviour' Causal relation: {Social_Control} → regulates → {Deviance} Semantical explanation of deviance_ID000008: Deviance refers to behaviour that violates the standards of conduct or expectations of a group or society. What is considered deviant varies across cultures, social groups, and time periods, as it is defined by social norms and values. Deviant behaviour can range from minor infractions of social norms to serious violations of laws. Sociologists study deviance to understand why people violate norms, how societies react to deviance, and the role of deviance in social change. Various theories attempt to explain deviance, including anomie theory, differential association theory, control theory, and labeling theory. Deviance is not inherently negative; while some deviant acts are harmful, others can challenge existing norms and lead to social progress.
The deviance_ID000009 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Marginalisation and Deviance' Causal relation: {Deviance, Stigma} → marginalises → {Social_Exclusion, Minority_Group} Semantical explanation of deviance_ID000009: Deviance refers to behaviour that violates the standards of conduct or expectations of a group or society. What is considered deviant varies across cultures, social groups, and time periods, as it is defined by social norms and values. Deviant behaviour can range from minor infractions of social norms to serious violations of laws. Sociologists study deviance to understand why people violate norms, how societies react to deviance, and the role of deviance in social change. Various theories attempt to explain deviance, including anomie theory, differential association theory, control theory, and labeling theory. Deviance is not inherently negative; while some deviant acts are harmful, others can challenge existing norms and lead to social progress.
The deviance_ID000010 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Regulation and Norm Enforcement' Causal relation: {Social_Control, Norm} → regulates → {Deviance, Formal_Social_Control} Semantical explanation of deviance_ID000010: Deviance refers to behaviour that violates the standards of conduct or expectations of a group or society. What is considered deviant varies across cultures, social groups, and time periods, as it is defined by social norms and values. Deviant behaviour can range from minor infractions of social norms to serious violations of laws. Sociologists study deviance to understand why people violate norms, how societies react to deviance, and the role of deviance in social change. Various theories attempt to explain deviance, including anomie theory, differential association theory, control theory, and labeling theory. Deviance is not inherently negative; while some deviant acts are harmful, others can challenge existing norms and lead to social progress.
The deviance_ID000011 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Stigmatisation Processes' Causal relation: {Labeling_Theory, Social_Constructionist_Perspective} → stigmatises → {Stigma, Deviance} Semantical explanation of deviance_ID000011: Deviance refers to behaviour that violates the standards of conduct or expectations of a group or society. What is considered deviant varies across cultures, social groups, and time periods, as it is defined by social norms and values. Deviant behaviour can range from minor infractions of social norms to serious violations of laws. Sociologists study deviance to understand why people violate norms, how societies react to deviance, and the role of deviance in social change. Various theories attempt to explain deviance, including anomie theory, differential association theory, control theory, and labeling theory. Deviance is not inherently negative; while some deviant acts are harmful, others can challenge existing norms and lead to social progress.
The diaspora_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Population Migration Patterns' Causal relation: {Migration, Immigration} → migrates → {Diaspora, Push_And_Pull_Factor} Semantical explanation of diaspora_ID000001: Diaspora refers to the dispersal of an ethnic population from an original homeland into foreign areas, often in a forced manner or under traumatic circumstances such as war, famine, or persecution. The term can also refer to the communities formed by these dispersed people in their new locations, who often maintain a sense of connection to their homeland and a shared cultural identity. Examples of diasporas include the Jewish diaspora, the African diaspora resulting from the slave trade, and the Armenian diaspora following the genocide. Diasporic communities often play a significant role in transnational networks, maintaining cultural traditions, and sometimes engaging in political or economic activities related to their homeland. The study of diasporas examines issues of identity, belonging, cultural adaptation, and the complex relationships between diasporic communities and both their homeland and their adopted countries.
The diffusion_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Diffusion and Social Innovation' Causal relation: {Diffusion, Cultural_Capital} → hasInfluence → {Innovation, Social_Change} Semantical explanation of diffusion_ID000001: Diffusion is the process by which a cultural item, such as an idea, innovation, practice, or material object, is spread from one group to another or from one society to another. This can occur through various forms of contact, including trade, migration, communication, and conquest. Cultural diffusion plays a significant role in cultural change, as societies are constantly borrowing and adapting elements from other cultures. The rate and extent of diffusion can be influenced by factors such as the compatibility of the new cultural item with existing cultural elements, the social status of the adopters, and the intensity of contact between the groups. Diffusion can lead to both cultural enrichment and cultural homogenisation, depending on the specific context and the nature of the cultural exchange.
The diffusion_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Diffusion Influences Innovation' Causal relation: {Diffusion} → hasInfluence → {Innovation} Semantical explanation of diffusion_ID000002: Diffusion is the process by which a cultural item, such as an idea, innovation, practice, or material object, is spread from one group to another or from one society to another. This can occur through various forms of contact, including trade, migration, communication, and conquest. Cultural diffusion plays a significant role in cultural change, as societies are constantly borrowing and adapting elements from other cultures. The rate and extent of diffusion can be influenced by factors such as the compatibility of the new cultural item with existing cultural elements, the social status of the adopters, and the intensity of contact between the groups. Diffusion can lead to both cultural enrichment and cultural homogenisation, depending on the specific context and the nature of the cultural exchange.
The discrimination_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Discrimination Processes and Social Marginalisation' Causal relation: {Discrimination, Segregation, Institutional_Discrimination} → marginalises → {Minority_Group} Semantical explanation of discrimination_ID000001: Discrimination is the process of denying opportunities and equal rights to individuals and groups because of prejudice or other arbitrary reasons, often stemming from negative stereotypes and biases. This can manifest in various forms, including individual acts of prejudice and systemic or institutional discrimination embedded in policies and practices. Discrimination can target individuals based on a wide range of characteristics, such as age, sex, nationality, religion, skin color, disability, or physical appearance. It involves treating people unfairly or unequally due to their membership in a particular group, rather than based on their individual merits or abilities. The consequences of discrimination can be significant, leading to social exclusion, economic disadvantage, limited access to resources, and psychological harm for those who experience it. While overt forms of discrimination are often condemned, more subtle or indirect forms can persist and continue to perpetuate inequalities within society. Addressing discrimination requires not only legal and policy measures but also efforts to challenge underlying prejudices and stereotypes through education and awareness. The impact of discrimination can be particularly pronounced when individuals face multiple forms of discrimination based on intersecting aspects of their identity, such as age combined with gender, race, or disability.
The dyad_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Primary Group Social Interaction' Causal relation: {Primary_Group, Small_Group} → communicatesWith → {Social_Interaction, Dyad} Semantical explanation of dyad_ID000001: A dyad is a two-member group, representing the smallest possible social group. Dyads are characterised by intense interaction and mutual dependence between the two members, as each person's participation is crucial for the group's existence. The intimacy and directness of interaction in a dyad can lead to strong emotional bonds, but also to potential instability, as the withdrawal or loss of one member dissolves the group entirely. Decision-making in a dyad is often more direct and personal compared to larger groups, as there are only two perspectives to consider. However, disagreements can be more challenging to resolve without the possibility of a third-party mediator. Dyads play a fundamental role in social life, forming the basis of many close relationships, such as romantic partnerships and close friendships. The unique dynamics of dyads have been a subject of interest in sociology, particularly in the study of small group interactions.
The e-commerce_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Digital Technology Social Transformation' Causal relation: {Internet, E-commerce} → digitalises → {Social_Change, Cyberspace} Semantical explanation of e-commerce_ID000001: E-commerce, short for electronic commerce, encompasses the numerous ways that people with access to the Internet can conduct business transactions from their computers or other digital devices. This includes a wide range of online activities such as buying and selling goods and services, conducting financial transactions, and exchanging information for commercial purposes. E-commerce has revolutionised the way businesses operate and consumers shop, offering convenience, accessibility, and a global marketplace. It includes various models, such as business-to-consumer (B2C) retail, business-to-business (B2B) transactions, and consumer-to-consumer (C2C) platforms. The growth of e-commerce has had significant economic and social impacts, transforming industries, creating new business opportunities, and altering consumer behaviour.
The economic_And_Industrial_Transformation_Process_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Technological Change and Work Transformation' Causal relation: {Innovation, Internet} → influencesHistorically → {Economy, Economic_And_Industrial_Transformation_Process} Semantical explanation of economic_And_Industrial_Transformation_Process_ID000001: Economic_And_Industrial_Transformation_Process encompasses the fundamental shifts in economic organisation, production systems, and industrial structures that characterise major transitions in societal development. These processes involve comprehensive changes in how societies organise production, distribute goods and services, and structure economic relationships between different social classes and institutions. The transformation from traditional agricultural economies to industrial systems, and subsequently to post-industrial arrangements, represents one of the most significant social changes in human history. These processes are characterised by technological innovation, changes in labor organisation, shifts in the relationship between capital and labor, and the emergence of new forms of economic coordination and control. The Industrial Revolution exemplifies how technological advancement can trigger cascading social changes that reshape entire societies. Post-Fordism demonstrates how production systems continue to evolve in response to technological capabilities and market demands. Deindustrialisation shows how economic transformation can also involve the decline of previously dominant sectors, creating new challenges and opportunities. These processes fundamentally alter social stratification, work experiences, community structures, and the overall organisation of social life, making them central to understanding modern socioeconomic development.
The economic_Interdependence_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Coordination and Market Systems' Causal relation: {Economic_System} → coordinates → {Economy, Economic_Interdependence} Semantical explanation of economic_Interdependence_ID000001: Economic interdependence is the outcome of specialisation and the division of labor, where self-sufficiency is superseded and individuals, regions, or nations depend on others to produce many or most of the goods and services they need to sustain their lives. This interconnectedness arises when different entities focus on producing specific goods or services more efficiently than others and then trade with each other to meet their diverse needs and wants. Economic interdependence can lead to increased efficiency, productivity, and overall economic growth by allowing for specialisation and economies of scale. However, it also means that disruptions in one part of the interdependent system can have ripple effects across other parts, creating vulnerabilities to economic shocks and global events. The rise of globalisation has significantly increased economic interdependence between countries, making national economies more reliant on international trade and financial flows.
The economic_Interdependence_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Integration and Labor Migration' Causal relation: {Economic_System, Economic_Interdependence} → influencesHistorically → {Migration, Cultural_Diversity} Semantical explanation of economic_Interdependence_ID000002: Economic interdependence is the outcome of specialisation and the division of labor, where self-sufficiency is superseded and individuals, regions, or nations depend on others to produce many or most of the goods and services they need to sustain their lives. This interconnectedness arises when different entities focus on producing specific goods or services more efficiently than others and then trade with each other to meet their diverse needs and wants. Economic interdependence can lead to increased efficiency, productivity, and overall economic growth by allowing for specialisation and economies of scale. However, it also means that disruptions in one part of the interdependent system can have ripple effects across other parts, creating vulnerabilities to economic shocks and global events. The rise of globalisation has significantly increased economic interdependence between countries, making national economies more reliant on international trade and financial flows.
The economic_Interdependence_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Market Competition' Causal relation: {Multinational_Corporation, Capitalism} → competesWith → {Economy, Economic_Interdependence} Semantical explanation of economic_Interdependence_ID000003: Economic interdependence is the outcome of specialisation and the division of labor, where self-sufficiency is superseded and individuals, regions, or nations depend on others to produce many or most of the goods and services they need to sustain their lives. This interconnectedness arises when different entities focus on producing specific goods or services more efficiently than others and then trade with each other to meet their diverse needs and wants. Economic interdependence can lead to increased efficiency, productivity, and overall economic growth by allowing for specialisation and economies of scale. However, it also means that disruptions in one part of the interdependent system can have ripple effects across other parts, creating vulnerabilities to economic shocks and global events. The rise of globalisation has significantly increased economic interdependence between countries, making national economies more reliant on international trade and financial flows.
The economic_System_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Corporate Crime and Organisational Deviance' Causal relation: {White-collar_Crime, Corporate_Crime} → influencesHistorically → {Economic_System, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of economic_System_ID000001: An economic system is the social institution through which goods and services are produced, distributed, and consumed within a society. It encompasses the organisational arrangements, rules, and practices that govern how a society allocates its resources to satisfy the needs and wants of its members. Different societies have adopted various types of economic systems throughout history, including traditional economies, command economies, market economies (capitalism), and mixed economies that combine elements of different systems. Each type of economic system has its own set of principles regarding ownership of resources, decision-making processes, and mechanisms for production, distribution, and consumption. The dominant economic system in a society has a profound impact on its social structure, levels of inequality, and the daily lives of its people.
The economic_System_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Corporate Power and Economic Concentration' Causal relation: {Multinational_Corporation, Monopoly} → controls → {Economic_System, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of economic_System_ID000002: An economic system is the social institution through which goods and services are produced, distributed, and consumed within a society. It encompasses the organisational arrangements, rules, and practices that govern how a society allocates its resources to satisfy the needs and wants of its members. Different societies have adopted various types of economic systems throughout history, including traditional economies, command economies, market economies (capitalism), and mixed economies that combine elements of different systems. Each type of economic system has its own set of principles regarding ownership of resources, decision-making processes, and mechanisms for production, distribution, and consumption. The dominant economic system in a society has a profound impact on its social structure, levels of inequality, and the daily lives of its people.
The economic_System_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Deindustrialisation and Urban Decline' Causal relation: {Deindustrialisation, Economic_System} → influencesHistorically → {Working_Class, Relative_Deprivation} Semantical explanation of economic_System_ID000003: An economic system is the social institution through which goods and services are produced, distributed, and consumed within a society. It encompasses the organisational arrangements, rules, and practices that govern how a society allocates its resources to satisfy the needs and wants of its members. Different societies have adopted various types of economic systems throughout history, including traditional economies, command economies, market economies (capitalism), and mixed economies that combine elements of different systems. Each type of economic system has its own set of principles regarding ownership of resources, decision-making processes, and mechanisms for production, distribution, and consumption. The dominant economic system in a society has a profound impact on its social structure, levels of inequality, and the daily lives of its people.
The economic_System_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Class Stratification' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Economic_System} → stratifies → {Social_Class, Social_Stratification} Semantical explanation of economic_System_ID000004: An economic system is the social institution through which goods and services are produced, distributed, and consumed within a society. It encompasses the organisational arrangements, rules, and practices that govern how a society allocates its resources to satisfy the needs and wants of its members. Different societies have adopted various types of economic systems throughout history, including traditional economies, command economies, market economies (capitalism), and mixed economies that combine elements of different systems. Each type of economic system has its own set of principles regarding ownership of resources, decision-making processes, and mechanisms for production, distribution, and consumption. The dominant economic system in a society has a profound impact on its social structure, levels of inequality, and the daily lives of its people.
The economic_System_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Coordination and Market Systems' Causal relation: {Economic_System} → coordinates → {Economy, Economic_Interdependence} Semantical explanation of economic_System_ID000005: An economic system is the social institution through which goods and services are produced, distributed, and consumed within a society. It encompasses the organisational arrangements, rules, and practices that govern how a society allocates its resources to satisfy the needs and wants of its members. Different societies have adopted various types of economic systems throughout history, including traditional economies, command economies, market economies (capitalism), and mixed economies that combine elements of different systems. Each type of economic system has its own set of principles regarding ownership of resources, decision-making processes, and mechanisms for production, distribution, and consumption. The dominant economic system in a society has a profound impact on its social structure, levels of inequality, and the daily lives of its people.
The economic_System_ID000006 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Inequality and Migration' Causal relation: {Economic_System, Outsourcing} → causallyInfluencedBy → {Migration, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of economic_System_ID000006: An economic system is the social institution through which goods and services are produced, distributed, and consumed within a society. It encompasses the organisational arrangements, rules, and practices that govern how a society allocates its resources to satisfy the needs and wants of its members. Different societies have adopted various types of economic systems throughout history, including traditional economies, command economies, market economies (capitalism), and mixed economies that combine elements of different systems. Each type of economic system has its own set of principles regarding ownership of resources, decision-making processes, and mechanisms for production, distribution, and consumption. The dominant economic system in a society has a profound impact on its social structure, levels of inequality, and the daily lives of its people.
The economic_System_ID000007 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Integration and Labor Migration' Causal relation: {Economic_System, Economic_Interdependence} → influencesHistorically → {Migration, Cultural_Diversity} Semantical explanation of economic_System_ID000007: An economic system is the social institution through which goods and services are produced, distributed, and consumed within a society. It encompasses the organisational arrangements, rules, and practices that govern how a society allocates its resources to satisfy the needs and wants of its members. Different societies have adopted various types of economic systems throughout history, including traditional economies, command economies, market economies (capitalism), and mixed economies that combine elements of different systems. Each type of economic system has its own set of principles regarding ownership of resources, decision-making processes, and mechanisms for production, distribution, and consumption. The dominant economic system in a society has a profound impact on its social structure, levels of inequality, and the daily lives of its people.
The economic_System_ID000008 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Market Control' Causal relation: {Monopoly, Multinational_Corporation} → controls → {Economy, Economic_System} Semantical explanation of economic_System_ID000008: An economic system is the social institution through which goods and services are produced, distributed, and consumed within a society. It encompasses the organisational arrangements, rules, and practices that govern how a society allocates its resources to satisfy the needs and wants of its members. Different societies have adopted various types of economic systems throughout history, including traditional economies, command economies, market economies (capitalism), and mixed economies that combine elements of different systems. Each type of economic system has its own set of principles regarding ownership of resources, decision-making processes, and mechanisms for production, distribution, and consumption. The dominant economic system in a society has a profound impact on its social structure, levels of inequality, and the daily lives of its people.
The economic_System_ID000009 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic System Coordinates Production' Causal relation: {Economic_System} → coordinates → {Economy} Semantical explanation of economic_System_ID000009: An economic system is the social institution through which goods and services are produced, distributed, and consumed within a society. It encompasses the organisational arrangements, rules, and practices that govern how a society allocates its resources to satisfy the needs and wants of its members. Different societies have adopted various types of economic systems throughout history, including traditional economies, command economies, market economies (capitalism), and mixed economies that combine elements of different systems. Each type of economic system has its own set of principles regarding ownership of resources, decision-making processes, and mechanisms for production, distribution, and consumption. The dominant economic system in a society has a profound impact on its social structure, levels of inequality, and the daily lives of its people.
The economic_System_ID000010 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Environmental Technology and Development' Causal relation: {Innovation, Sustainable_Development} → influencesHistorically → {Economic_System, Social_Change} Semantical explanation of economic_System_ID000010: An economic system is the social institution through which goods and services are produced, distributed, and consumed within a society. It encompasses the organisational arrangements, rules, and practices that govern how a society allocates its resources to satisfy the needs and wants of its members. Different societies have adopted various types of economic systems throughout history, including traditional economies, command economies, market economies (capitalism), and mixed economies that combine elements of different systems. Each type of economic system has its own set of principles regarding ownership of resources, decision-making processes, and mechanisms for production, distribution, and consumption. The dominant economic system in a society has a profound impact on its social structure, levels of inequality, and the daily lives of its people.
The economic_System_ID000011 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Market Economic Control' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Economy} → controls → {Economic_System, Laissez-faire} Semantical explanation of economic_System_ID000011: An economic system is the social institution through which goods and services are produced, distributed, and consumed within a society. It encompasses the organisational arrangements, rules, and practices that govern how a society allocates its resources to satisfy the needs and wants of its members. Different societies have adopted various types of economic systems throughout history, including traditional economies, command economies, market economies (capitalism), and mixed economies that combine elements of different systems. Each type of economic system has its own set of principles regarding ownership of resources, decision-making processes, and mechanisms for production, distribution, and consumption. The dominant economic system in a society has a profound impact on its social structure, levels of inequality, and the daily lives of its people.
The economy_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Automation and Labor Displacement' Causal relation: {Innovation, Internet} → automates → {Economy, Working_Class} Semantical explanation of economy_ID000001: The economy refers to the system of production and exchange which provides for the material needs of individuals living in a given society. It encompasses all activities related to the creation, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. The economy is a fundamental aspect of social life, as it shapes how people earn a living, access resources, and interact with one another in the process of fulfilling their material needs and wants. The structure and functioning of the economy are influenced by a complex interplay of social, cultural, political, and technological factors. Sociologists study the economy to understand its impact on social inequality, social mobility, work, and other aspects of social life. Different types of economies, such as agrarian, industrial, and post-industrial economies, have distinct characteristics and social consequences.
The economy_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Coordination and Market Systems' Causal relation: {Economic_System} → coordinates → {Economy, Economic_Interdependence} Semantical explanation of economy_ID000002: The economy refers to the system of production and exchange which provides for the material needs of individuals living in a given society. It encompasses all activities related to the creation, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. The economy is a fundamental aspect of social life, as it shapes how people earn a living, access resources, and interact with one another in the process of fulfilling their material needs and wants. The structure and functioning of the economy are influenced by a complex interplay of social, cultural, political, and technological factors. Sociologists study the economy to understand its impact on social inequality, social mobility, work, and other aspects of social life. Different types of economies, such as agrarian, industrial, and post-industrial economies, have distinct characteristics and social consequences.
The economy_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Market Competition' Causal relation: {Multinational_Corporation, Capitalism} → competesWith → {Economy, Economic_Interdependence} Semantical explanation of economy_ID000003: The economy refers to the system of production and exchange which provides for the material needs of individuals living in a given society. It encompasses all activities related to the creation, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. The economy is a fundamental aspect of social life, as it shapes how people earn a living, access resources, and interact with one another in the process of fulfilling their material needs and wants. The structure and functioning of the economy are influenced by a complex interplay of social, cultural, political, and technological factors. Sociologists study the economy to understand its impact on social inequality, social mobility, work, and other aspects of social life. Different types of economies, such as agrarian, industrial, and post-industrial economies, have distinct characteristics and social consequences.
The economy_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Market Control' Causal relation: {Monopoly, Multinational_Corporation} → controls → {Economy, Economic_System} Semantical explanation of economy_ID000004: The economy refers to the system of production and exchange which provides for the material needs of individuals living in a given society. It encompasses all activities related to the creation, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. The economy is a fundamental aspect of social life, as it shapes how people earn a living, access resources, and interact with one another in the process of fulfilling their material needs and wants. The structure and functioning of the economy are influenced by a complex interplay of social, cultural, political, and technological factors. Sociologists study the economy to understand its impact on social inequality, social mobility, work, and other aspects of social life. Different types of economies, such as agrarian, industrial, and post-industrial economies, have distinct characteristics and social consequences.
The economy_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic System Coordinates Production' Causal relation: {Economic_System} → coordinates → {Economy} Semantical explanation of economy_ID000005: The economy refers to the system of production and exchange which provides for the material needs of individuals living in a given society. It encompasses all activities related to the creation, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. The economy is a fundamental aspect of social life, as it shapes how people earn a living, access resources, and interact with one another in the process of fulfilling their material needs and wants. The structure and functioning of the economy are influenced by a complex interplay of social, cultural, political, and technological factors. Sociologists study the economy to understand its impact on social inequality, social mobility, work, and other aspects of social life. Different types of economies, such as agrarian, industrial, and post-industrial economies, have distinct characteristics and social consequences.
The economy_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Innovation Automates Economy' Causal relation: {Innovation} → automates → {Economy} Semantical explanation of economy_ID000006: The economy refers to the system of production and exchange which provides for the material needs of individuals living in a given society. It encompasses all activities related to the creation, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. The economy is a fundamental aspect of social life, as it shapes how people earn a living, access resources, and interact with one another in the process of fulfilling their material needs and wants. The structure and functioning of the economy are influenced by a complex interplay of social, cultural, political, and technological factors. Sociologists study the economy to understand its impact on social inequality, social mobility, work, and other aspects of social life. Different types of economies, such as agrarian, industrial, and post-industrial economies, have distinct characteristics and social consequences.
The economy_ID000007 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Market Economic Control' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Economy} → controls → {Economic_System, Laissez-faire} Semantical explanation of economy_ID000007: The economy refers to the system of production and exchange which provides for the material needs of individuals living in a given society. It encompasses all activities related to the creation, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. The economy is a fundamental aspect of social life, as it shapes how people earn a living, access resources, and interact with one another in the process of fulfilling their material needs and wants. The structure and functioning of the economy are influenced by a complex interplay of social, cultural, political, and technological factors. Sociologists study the economy to understand its impact on social inequality, social mobility, work, and other aspects of social life. Different types of economies, such as agrarian, industrial, and post-industrial economies, have distinct characteristics and social consequences.
The economy_ID000008 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Technological Change and Work Transformation' Causal relation: {Innovation, Internet} → influencesHistorically → {Economy, Economic_And_Industrial_Transformation_Process} Semantical explanation of economy_ID000008: The economy refers to the system of production and exchange which provides for the material needs of individuals living in a given society. It encompasses all activities related to the creation, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. The economy is a fundamental aspect of social life, as it shapes how people earn a living, access resources, and interact with one another in the process of fulfilling their material needs and wants. The structure and functioning of the economy are influenced by a complex interplay of social, cultural, political, and technological factors. Sociologists study the economy to understand its impact on social inequality, social mobility, work, and other aspects of social life. Different types of economies, such as agrarian, industrial, and post-industrial economies, have distinct characteristics and social consequences.
The education_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Transmission Processes' Causal relation: {Cultural_Transmission, Education} → transmits → {Culture, Cultural_Capital} Semantical explanation of education_ID000001: Education is a formal process of learning in which some people consciously teach while others adopt the social role of learner, typically occurring in institutions like schools, colleges, and universities. However, education also encompasses informal learning that takes place outside of formal settings, such as through family, peers, and media. The goals of education are multifaceted, including the transmission of knowledge, skills, values, and cultural norms from one generation to the next, as well as the personal and intellectual development of individuals. Education plays a crucial role in socialisation, preparing individuals for their roles in society and contributing to social mobility. Sociologists study education to understand its impact on social inequality, its relationship to the economy, and its role in shaping individual identities and life chances.
The education_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Digital Divide and Information Inequality' Causal relation: {Internet, Relative_Poverty} → stratifies → {Social_Inequality, Education} Semantical explanation of education_ID000002: Education is a formal process of learning in which some people consciously teach while others adopt the social role of learner, typically occurring in institutions like schools, colleges, and universities. However, education also encompasses informal learning that takes place outside of formal settings, such as through family, peers, and media. The goals of education are multifaceted, including the transmission of knowledge, skills, values, and cultural norms from one generation to the next, as well as the personal and intellectual development of individuals. Education plays a crucial role in socialisation, preparing individuals for their roles in society and contributing to social mobility. Sociologists study education to understand its impact on social inequality, its relationship to the economy, and its role in shaping individual identities and life chances.
The education_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Education Educates Citizens' Causal relation: {Education} → educates → {Social_Mobility} Semantical explanation of education_ID000003: Education is a formal process of learning in which some people consciously teach while others adopt the social role of learner, typically occurring in institutions like schools, colleges, and universities. However, education also encompasses informal learning that takes place outside of formal settings, such as through family, peers, and media. The goals of education are multifaceted, including the transmission of knowledge, skills, values, and cultural norms from one generation to the next, as well as the personal and intellectual development of individuals. Education plays a crucial role in socialisation, preparing individuals for their roles in society and contributing to social mobility. Sociologists study education to understand its impact on social inequality, its relationship to the economy, and its role in shaping individual identities and life chances.
The education_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Education Socialises Individuals' Causal relation: {Education} → socialises → {Socialisation} Semantical explanation of education_ID000004: Education is a formal process of learning in which some people consciously teach while others adopt the social role of learner, typically occurring in institutions like schools, colleges, and universities. However, education also encompasses informal learning that takes place outside of formal settings, such as through family, peers, and media. The goals of education are multifaceted, including the transmission of knowledge, skills, values, and cultural norms from one generation to the next, as well as the personal and intellectual development of individuals. Education plays a crucial role in socialisation, preparing individuals for their roles in society and contributing to social mobility. Sociologists study education to understand its impact on social inequality, its relationship to the economy, and its role in shaping individual identities and life chances.
The education_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Social Reproduction' Causal relation: {Education, Hidden_Curriculum} → reproduces → {Cultural_Reproduction, Social_Class} Semantical explanation of education_ID000005: Education is a formal process of learning in which some people consciously teach while others adopt the social role of learner, typically occurring in institutions like schools, colleges, and universities. However, education also encompasses informal learning that takes place outside of formal settings, such as through family, peers, and media. The goals of education are multifaceted, including the transmission of knowledge, skills, values, and cultural norms from one generation to the next, as well as the personal and intellectual development of individuals. Education plays a crucial role in socialisation, preparing individuals for their roles in society and contributing to social mobility. Sociologists study education to understand its impact on social inequality, its relationship to the economy, and its role in shaping individual identities and life chances.
The education_ID000006 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Socialisation and Cultural Reproduction' Causal relation: {Education, Family} → socialises → {Socialisation, Cultural_Reproduction} Semantical explanation of education_ID000006: Education is a formal process of learning in which some people consciously teach while others adopt the social role of learner, typically occurring in institutions like schools, colleges, and universities. However, education also encompasses informal learning that takes place outside of formal settings, such as through family, peers, and media. The goals of education are multifaceted, including the transmission of knowledge, skills, values, and cultural norms from one generation to the next, as well as the personal and intellectual development of individuals. Education plays a crucial role in socialisation, preparing individuals for their roles in society and contributing to social mobility. Sociologists study education to understand its impact on social inequality, its relationship to the economy, and its role in shaping individual identities and life chances.
The education_ID000007 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Stratification and Opportunity' Causal relation: {Education, Tracking} → stratifies → {Social_Class, Social_Mobility} Semantical explanation of education_ID000007: Education is a formal process of learning in which some people consciously teach while others adopt the social role of learner, typically occurring in institutions like schools, colleges, and universities. However, education also encompasses informal learning that takes place outside of formal settings, such as through family, peers, and media. The goals of education are multifaceted, including the transmission of knowledge, skills, values, and cultural norms from one generation to the next, as well as the personal and intellectual development of individuals. Education plays a crucial role in socialisation, preparing individuals for their roles in society and contributing to social mobility. Sociologists study education to understand its impact on social inequality, its relationship to the economy, and its role in shaping individual identities and life chances.
The education_ID000008 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Stratification Process' Causal relation: {Education, Cultural_Capital} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification, Class_System} Semantical explanation of education_ID000008: Education is a formal process of learning in which some people consciously teach while others adopt the social role of learner, typically occurring in institutions like schools, colleges, and universities. However, education also encompasses informal learning that takes place outside of formal settings, such as through family, peers, and media. The goals of education are multifaceted, including the transmission of knowledge, skills, values, and cultural norms from one generation to the next, as well as the personal and intellectual development of individuals. Education plays a crucial role in socialisation, preparing individuals for their roles in society and contributing to social mobility. Sociologists study education to understand its impact on social inequality, its relationship to the economy, and its role in shaping individual identities and life chances.
The education_ID000009 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Systems and Social Mobility' Causal relation: {Education, Achieved_Status} → influencesHistorically → {Social_Mobility, Class_Consciousness} Semantical explanation of education_ID000009: Education is a formal process of learning in which some people consciously teach while others adopt the social role of learner, typically occurring in institutions like schools, colleges, and universities. However, education also encompasses informal learning that takes place outside of formal settings, such as through family, peers, and media. The goals of education are multifaceted, including the transmission of knowledge, skills, values, and cultural norms from one generation to the next, as well as the personal and intellectual development of individuals. Education plays a crucial role in socialisation, preparing individuals for their roles in society and contributing to social mobility. Sociologists study education to understand its impact on social inequality, its relationship to the economy, and its role in shaping individual identities and life chances.
The education_ID000010 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Systems and Social Mobility' Causal relation: {Education, Cultural_Capital} → educates → {Social_Mobility, Social_Class} Semantical explanation of education_ID000010: Education is a formal process of learning in which some people consciously teach while others adopt the social role of learner, typically occurring in institutions like schools, colleges, and universities. However, education also encompasses informal learning that takes place outside of formal settings, such as through family, peers, and media. The goals of education are multifaceted, including the transmission of knowledge, skills, values, and cultural norms from one generation to the next, as well as the personal and intellectual development of individuals. Education plays a crucial role in socialisation, preparing individuals for their roles in society and contributing to social mobility. Sociologists study education to understand its impact on social inequality, its relationship to the economy, and its role in shaping individual identities and life chances.
The education_ID000011 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Tracking Systems' Causal relation: {Tracking, Education} → segregates → {Segregation, Social_Stratification} Semantical explanation of education_ID000011: Education is a formal process of learning in which some people consciously teach while others adopt the social role of learner, typically occurring in institutions like schools, colleges, and universities. However, education also encompasses informal learning that takes place outside of formal settings, such as through family, peers, and media. The goals of education are multifaceted, including the transmission of knowledge, skills, values, and cultural norms from one generation to the next, as well as the personal and intellectual development of individuals. Education plays a crucial role in socialisation, preparing individuals for their roles in society and contributing to social mobility. Sociologists study education to understand its impact on social inequality, its relationship to the economy, and its role in shaping individual identities and life chances.
The education_ID000012 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Formal Educational Socialisation' Causal relation: {Education, Hidden_Curriculum} → educates → {Secondary_Socialisation, Cultural_Capital} Semantical explanation of education_ID000012: Education is a formal process of learning in which some people consciously teach while others adopt the social role of learner, typically occurring in institutions like schools, colleges, and universities. However, education also encompasses informal learning that takes place outside of formal settings, such as through family, peers, and media. The goals of education are multifaceted, including the transmission of knowledge, skills, values, and cultural norms from one generation to the next, as well as the personal and intellectual development of individuals. Education plays a crucial role in socialisation, preparing individuals for their roles in society and contributing to social mobility. Sociologists study education to understand its impact on social inequality, its relationship to the economy, and its role in shaping individual identities and life chances.
The education_ID000013 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Higher Education Stratification' Causal relation: {Education, Cultural_Capital} → educates → {Social_Class, Social_Stratification} Semantical explanation of education_ID000013: Education is a formal process of learning in which some people consciously teach while others adopt the social role of learner, typically occurring in institutions like schools, colleges, and universities. However, education also encompasses informal learning that takes place outside of formal settings, such as through family, peers, and media. The goals of education are multifaceted, including the transmission of knowledge, skills, values, and cultural norms from one generation to the next, as well as the personal and intellectual development of individuals. Education plays a crucial role in socialisation, preparing individuals for their roles in society and contributing to social mobility. Sociologists study education to understand its impact on social inequality, its relationship to the economy, and its role in shaping individual identities and life chances.
The education_ID000014 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Primary Socialisation and Identity Formation' Causal relation: {Primary_Socialisation, Family, Education} → socialises → {Identity, Value, Social_Role} Semantical explanation of education_ID000014: Education is a formal process of learning in which some people consciously teach while others adopt the social role of learner, typically occurring in institutions like schools, colleges, and universities. However, education also encompasses informal learning that takes place outside of formal settings, such as through family, peers, and media. The goals of education are multifaceted, including the transmission of knowledge, skills, values, and cultural norms from one generation to the next, as well as the personal and intellectual development of individuals. Education plays a crucial role in socialisation, preparing individuals for their roles in society and contributing to social mobility. Sociologists study education to understand its impact on social inequality, its relationship to the economy, and its role in shaping individual identities and life chances.
The education_ID000015 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Reproduction Processes' Causal relation: {Cultural_Reproduction, Education} → reproduces → {Social_Class, Cultural_Capital} Semantical explanation of education_ID000015: Education is a formal process of learning in which some people consciously teach while others adopt the social role of learner, typically occurring in institutions like schools, colleges, and universities. However, education also encompasses informal learning that takes place outside of formal settings, such as through family, peers, and media. The goals of education are multifaceted, including the transmission of knowledge, skills, values, and cultural norms from one generation to the next, as well as the personal and intellectual development of individuals. Education plays a crucial role in socialisation, preparing individuals for their roles in society and contributing to social mobility. Sociologists study education to understand its impact on social inequality, its relationship to the economy, and its role in shaping individual identities and life chances.
The elite_Model_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Elite Power and Institutional Control' Causal relation: {Elite_Model, Power_Elite} → controls → {Political_System, Mass_Media} Semantical explanation of elite_Model_ID000001: The elite model is a view of society as ruled by a small group of individuals who share a common set of political and economic interests, effectively holding the majority of power and influence. This perspective suggests that despite the appearance of democracy, major decisions are made by a relatively cohesive group of elites who control key institutions, such as corporations, the government, and the military. These elites may come from similar social backgrounds, share similar values, and work to maintain their privileged positions and the existing social order. The elite model contrasts with the pluralist model, which argues that power is more widely distributed among various competing interest groups in society. Sociologists who subscribe to the elite model often study the social backgrounds, networks, and decision-making processes of those in power to understand how societal control is exercised.
The entrepreneur_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Professional Network Formation' Causal relation: {Professional_Criminal, Entrepreneur} → networks → {Social_Network, Social_Cohesion} Semantical explanation of entrepreneur_ID000001: An entrepreneur is someone who starts or owns a business venture and takes personal financial risks in the hope of making a profit. Entrepreneurs are often characterised by their innovativeness, initiative, and willingness to take on challenges to bring new ideas, products, or services to the market. They play a crucial role in economic development by creating jobs, driving innovation, and fostering competition. The success of an entrepreneur's venture is often dependent on factors such as market demand, effective business planning, access to resources, and the ability to adapt to changing circumstances. Entrepreneurship can be a driving force for economic growth and social change, as new businesses can disrupt existing industries and create new opportunities.
The environmental_Sociology_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Environmental Mobilisation and Sustainability' Causal relation: {Environmental_Sociology, Science} → mobilises → {Sustainable_Development, Natural_Environment} Semantical explanation of environmental_Sociology_ID000001: Environmental Sociology is a specialised subfield within sociology that focuses on the complex and reciprocal interactions and relationships between human societies and the natural environment. It examines how social factors, such as economic systems, political structures, cultural values, and technological advancements, shape environmental conditions and problems (e.g., global warming, deforestation, desertification, pollution, resource depletion). Conversely, it also investigates how environmental changes and challenges impact human societies, influencing social inequalities, migration patterns, health outcomes, and social conflicts. Environmental sociologists analyse the social causes and consequences of environmental degradation, the social movements advocating for environmental protection and justice, and the development of environmental policies and sustainable practices. This field often highlights issues of environmental justice, which addresses the disproportionate exposure of marginalised communities to environmental hazards. It emphasises a critical and systemic approach to understanding the human-environment nexus in a globalised world, often drawing on concepts like risk society and manufactured risk.Aging_Study = Aging Studies is an interdisciplinary academic field dedicated to the comprehensive examination of the multifaceted process of human aging and the experiences of older adults within societal contexts. This domain draws insights from sociology, psychology, biology, demography, public health, economics, and policy studies to understand the physiological, cognitive, emotional, and social changes that occur throughout the life course, particularly in later life. It focuses on the social roles older people occupy, the challenges they face (such as ageism, health disparities, and retirement transitions), and the diverse societal responses to an increasingly aging global population. Researchers in Aging Studies investigate topics like social support networks, elder care systems, generational relations, healthy aging initiatives, and the broader impact of demographic shifts on social institutions and resource allocation. The field also addresses the social construction of old age and the cultural perceptions of longevity, aiming to inform public policy and promote well-being, social inclusion, and equitable opportunities for individuals across all life stages within society. It is crucial for anticipating future societal needs.
The ethnic_Group_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Ethnic Group Creates Stratification' Causal relation: {Ethnic_Group} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification} Semantical explanation of ethnic_Group_ID000001: An ethnic group is a group of people who are set apart from others because of their shared national origin or distinctive cultural patterns, which can include language, religion, traditions, customs, and shared history. Members of an ethnic group typically share a sense of common identity and belonging based on these cultural elements, which distinguish them from other groups in society. Ethnicity is a social construct, meaning that it is defined and maintained through social interaction and cultural practices rather than being based on fixed biological traits. The boundaries of ethnic groups can be fluid and may change over time due to factors such as migration, intermarriage, and social and political contexts. The study of ethnic groups is central to understanding cultural diversity, intergroup relations, and issues of identity and belonging in sociology.
The ethnic_Group_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Discrimination Practices' Causal relation: {Institutional_Discrimination, Racism} → discriminatesAgainst → {Ethnic_Group, Racial_Group} Semantical explanation of ethnic_Group_ID000002: An ethnic group is a group of people who are set apart from others because of their shared national origin or distinctive cultural patterns, which can include language, religion, traditions, customs, and shared history. Members of an ethnic group typically share a sense of common identity and belonging based on these cultural elements, which distinguish them from other groups in society. Ethnicity is a social construct, meaning that it is defined and maintained through social interaction and cultural practices rather than being based on fixed biological traits. The boundaries of ethnic groups can be fluid and may change over time due to factors such as migration, intermarriage, and social and political contexts. The study of ethnic groups is central to understanding cultural diversity, intergroup relations, and issues of identity and belonging in sociology.
The ethnic_Group_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Racial Stratification and Social Hierarchy' Causal relation: {Racism, Ethnic_Group} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification, Social_Class} Semantical explanation of ethnic_Group_ID000003: An ethnic group is a group of people who are set apart from others because of their shared national origin or distinctive cultural patterns, which can include language, religion, traditions, customs, and shared history. Members of an ethnic group typically share a sense of common identity and belonging based on these cultural elements, which distinguish them from other groups in society. Ethnicity is a social construct, meaning that it is defined and maintained through social interaction and cultural practices rather than being based on fixed biological traits. The boundaries of ethnic groups can be fluid and may change over time due to factors such as migration, intermarriage, and social and political contexts. The study of ethnic groups is central to understanding cultural diversity, intergroup relations, and issues of identity and belonging in sociology.
The ethnic_Group_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Status Group Competition' Causal relation: {Status_Group, Ethnic_Group} → competesWith → {Prestige, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of ethnic_Group_ID000004: An ethnic group is a group of people who are set apart from others because of their shared national origin or distinctive cultural patterns, which can include language, religion, traditions, customs, and shared history. Members of an ethnic group typically share a sense of common identity and belonging based on these cultural elements, which distinguish them from other groups in society. Ethnicity is a social construct, meaning that it is defined and maintained through social interaction and cultural practices rather than being based on fixed biological traits. The boundaries of ethnic groups can be fluid and may change over time due to factors such as migration, intermarriage, and social and political contexts. The study of ethnic groups is central to understanding cultural diversity, intergroup relations, and issues of identity and belonging in sociology.
The ethnography_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Ethnographic Research Methods' Causal relation: {Ethnography, Participant_Observation} → observes → {Qualitative_Research, Cultural_Relativism} Semantical explanation of ethnography_ID000001: Ethnography is a qualitative research method that involves the study of an entire social setting or cultural group through extended systematic observation and immersion in the field. Ethnographers aim to gain an in-depth understanding of the culture, behaviours, and social dynamics of the group being studied from the perspective of its members. This often involves the researcher spending a significant amount of time living among the people they are studying, participating in their daily activities, conducting interviews, and analysing cultural artifacts and symbols. The goal of ethnography is to provide a rich and detailed description of the social world of the group under study, capturing the nuances and complexities of their culture and social life. Ethnographic research is often used in anthropology and sociology to explore diverse cultural practices, social structures, and the meanings that people create and share in their everyday interactions.
The ethnography_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Participant Observation Research' Causal relation: {Participant_Observation, Ethnography} → observes → {Observation, Qualitative_Research} Semantical explanation of ethnography_ID000002: Ethnography is a qualitative research method that involves the study of an entire social setting or cultural group through extended systematic observation and immersion in the field. Ethnographers aim to gain an in-depth understanding of the culture, behaviours, and social dynamics of the group being studied from the perspective of its members. This often involves the researcher spending a significant amount of time living among the people they are studying, participating in their daily activities, conducting interviews, and analysing cultural artifacts and symbols. The goal of ethnography is to provide a rich and detailed description of the social world of the group under study, capturing the nuances and complexities of their culture and social life. Ethnographic research is often used in anthropology and sociology to explore diverse cultural practices, social structures, and the meanings that people create and share in their everyday interactions.
The exploitation_Theory_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Colonial Economic Extraction' Causal relation: {Colonialism, Neo-colonialism} → exploits → {Exploitation_Theory, Underdevelopment} Semantical explanation of exploitation_Theory_ID000001: Exploitation theory, particularly within a Marxist framework, views racial subordination in the United States and other capitalist societies as a manifestation of the class system inherent in capitalism. This theory argues that racism and racial inequality serve the interests of the capitalist class by creating a split labor market, where workers are divided along racial lines, leading to lower wages for all workers and hindering the development of class consciousness and solidarity among the working class. By fostering racial antagonism, the bourgeoisie can maintain their power and profits by preventing the unified mobilisation of workers against their exploitation. Exploitation theory suggests that racial prejudice and discrimination are not simply matters of individual attitudes but are deeply embedded in the economic structure of capitalism and serve to perpetuate class inequality.
The exploitation_Theory_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Corporate Labor Exploitation' Causal relation: {Multinational_Corporation, Sweatshop} → exploits → {Exploitation_Theory, Working_Class} Semantical explanation of exploitation_Theory_ID000002: Exploitation theory, particularly within a Marxist framework, views racial subordination in the United States and other capitalist societies as a manifestation of the class system inherent in capitalism. This theory argues that racism and racial inequality serve the interests of the capitalist class by creating a split labor market, where workers are divided along racial lines, leading to lower wages for all workers and hindering the development of class consciousness and solidarity among the working class. By fostering racial antagonism, the bourgeoisie can maintain their power and profits by preventing the unified mobilisation of workers against their exploitation. Exploitation theory suggests that racial prejudice and discrimination are not simply matters of individual attitudes but are deeply embedded in the economic structure of capitalism and serve to perpetuate class inequality.
The extended_Family_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Family Formation Processes' Causal relation: {Nuclear_Family, Extended_Family} → adopts → {Adoption, Kinship} Semantical explanation of extended_Family_ID000001: An extended family is a family group consisting of close relatives extending beyond a couple and their children, living either within the same household or in a close and continuous relationship with one another. This can include grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other kin who play a significant role in the family's social and economic life. Extended family structures were more common in pre-industrial societies and in many cultures around the world, where they often provided a strong network of support, shared resources, and collective caregiving. While the nuclear family (a couple and their dependent children) has become more prevalent in many Western industrialised societies, extended family ties continue to be important for many individuals and can provide valuable social, emotional, and practical support.
The extended_Family_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Primary Socialisation Processes' Causal relation: {Nuclear_Family, Extended_Family} → socialises → {Primary_Socialisation, Secondary_Socialisation} Semantical explanation of extended_Family_ID000002: An extended family is a family group consisting of close relatives extending beyond a couple and their children, living either within the same household or in a close and continuous relationship with one another. This can include grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other kin who play a significant role in the family's social and economic life. Extended family structures were more common in pre-industrial societies and in many cultures around the world, where they often provided a strong network of support, shared resources, and collective caregiving. While the nuclear family (a couple and their dependent children) has become more prevalent in many Western industrialised societies, extended family ties continue to be important for many individuals and can provide valuable social, emotional, and practical support.
The family_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Reproduction and Social Inequality' Causal relation: {Cultural_Capital, Family} → reproduces → {Social_Class, Social_Mobility} Semantical explanation of family_ID000001: A family is a group of individuals related to one another by blood ties, marriage, or adoption who form an economic unit, the adult members of which are responsible for the upbringing of children. All known societies involve some form of family system, although the nature of family relationships is widely variable across cultures and throughout history. While in modern societies the main family form is often considered the nuclear family (a couple and their dependent children), a variety of extended family relationships (including grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins) are also frequently found and play important roles in individuals' lives. The family serves as a primary agent of socialisation, providing emotional support, care, and a sense of belonging for its members. It also plays a crucial role in the transmission of cultural norms, values, and traditions across generations.
The family_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Socialisation and Cultural Reproduction' Causal relation: {Education, Family} → socialises → {Socialisation, Cultural_Reproduction} Semantical explanation of family_ID000002: A family is a group of individuals related to one another by blood ties, marriage, or adoption who form an economic unit, the adult members of which are responsible for the upbringing of children. All known societies involve some form of family system, although the nature of family relationships is widely variable across cultures and throughout history. While in modern societies the main family form is often considered the nuclear family (a couple and their dependent children), a variety of extended family relationships (including grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins) are also frequently found and play important roles in individuals' lives. The family serves as a primary agent of socialisation, providing emotional support, care, and a sense of belonging for its members. It also plays a crucial role in the transmission of cultural norms, values, and traditions across generations.
The family_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Family Reproduces Culture' Causal relation: {Family} → reproduces → {Cultural_Reproduction} Semantical explanation of family_ID000003: A family is a group of individuals related to one another by blood ties, marriage, or adoption who form an economic unit, the adult members of which are responsible for the upbringing of children. All known societies involve some form of family system, although the nature of family relationships is widely variable across cultures and throughout history. While in modern societies the main family form is often considered the nuclear family (a couple and their dependent children), a variety of extended family relationships (including grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins) are also frequently found and play important roles in individuals' lives. The family serves as a primary agent of socialisation, providing emotional support, care, and a sense of belonging for its members. It also plays a crucial role in the transmission of cultural norms, values, and traditions across generations.
The family_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Family Structure Regulation' Causal relation: {Law, State} → regulates → {Marriage, Family} Semantical explanation of family_ID000004: A family is a group of individuals related to one another by blood ties, marriage, or adoption who form an economic unit, the adult members of which are responsible for the upbringing of children. All known societies involve some form of family system, although the nature of family relationships is widely variable across cultures and throughout history. While in modern societies the main family form is often considered the nuclear family (a couple and their dependent children), a variety of extended family relationships (including grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins) are also frequently found and play important roles in individuals' lives. The family serves as a primary agent of socialisation, providing emotional support, care, and a sense of belonging for its members. It also plays a crucial role in the transmission of cultural norms, values, and traditions across generations.
The family_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Intergenerational Cultural Transmission' Causal relation: {Primary_Socialisation, Family} → transmits → {Cultural_Transmission, Value} Semantical explanation of family_ID000005: A family is a group of individuals related to one another by blood ties, marriage, or adoption who form an economic unit, the adult members of which are responsible for the upbringing of children. All known societies involve some form of family system, although the nature of family relationships is widely variable across cultures and throughout history. While in modern societies the main family form is often considered the nuclear family (a couple and their dependent children), a variety of extended family relationships (including grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins) are also frequently found and play important roles in individuals' lives. The family serves as a primary agent of socialisation, providing emotional support, care, and a sense of belonging for its members. It also plays a crucial role in the transmission of cultural norms, values, and traditions across generations.
The family_ID000006 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Primary Socialisation and Identity Formation' Causal relation: {Primary_Socialisation, Family, Education} → socialises → {Identity, Value, Social_Role} Semantical explanation of family_ID000006: A family is a group of individuals related to one another by blood ties, marriage, or adoption who form an economic unit, the adult members of which are responsible for the upbringing of children. All known societies involve some form of family system, although the nature of family relationships is widely variable across cultures and throughout history. While in modern societies the main family form is often considered the nuclear family (a couple and their dependent children), a variety of extended family relationships (including grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins) are also frequently found and play important roles in individuals' lives. The family serves as a primary agent of socialisation, providing emotional support, care, and a sense of belonging for its members. It also plays a crucial role in the transmission of cultural norms, values, and traditions across generations.
The fashion_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media and Youth Cultural Influence' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Peer_Group, Youth_Culture} → hasInfluence → {Fashion, Culture} Semantical explanation of fashion_ID000001: Fashion refers to a social pattern in clothing, accessories, footwear, hairstyles, or behaviour that is favoured for a time by a large number of people within a particular culture or subculture. It is a dynamic and ever-changing phenomenon influenced by social, cultural, economic, and technological factors. Fashion can reflect current trends, social status, and individual identity, and it often involves a process of adoption, diffusion, and eventual obsolescence as new styles emerge. It is a form of collective behaviour that can be driven by designers, celebrities, media, and peer influence. The study of fashion in sociology examines its role in social differentiation, group affiliation, and the expression of cultural values. Trends in fashion can spread rapidly through modern communication channels, creating a sense of shared identity among those who adopt them.
The flexible_Production_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Post-Fordist Production and Employment Flexibility' Causal relation: {Post-Fordism, Flexible_Production} → influencesHistorically → {Job_Insecurity, Outsourcing} Semantical explanation of flexible_Production_ID000001: Flexible production is a process in which computers and advanced technologies are used to design and produce customised products for a mass market, allowing for greater variety and responsiveness to consumer demand. This contrasts with traditional mass production systems like Fordism, which focused on producing large quantities of standardised goods. Flexible production systems often involve computer-aided design (CAD), computer-aided manufacturing (CAM), and robotics, enabling manufacturers to quickly adapt production lines to create different versions of a product or even entirely new products with relatively low switching costs. This approach allows for greater product differentiation and the ability to cater to niche markets, enhancing competitiveness in a globalised economy. Flexible production requires a skilled and adaptable workforce capable of working with advanced technologies.
The formal_Organisation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Bureaucratic Authority and Institutional Organisation' Causal relation: {Bureaucratisation, Legal-rational_Authority} → institutionalises → {Formal_Organisation, Law} Semantical explanation of formal_Organisation_ID000001: A formal organisation is a special-purpose group designed and structured for maximum efficiency in achieving specific goals or objectives. These organisations are characterised by a hierarchical structure of authority, a clear division of labor based on specialised roles and responsibilities, formal rules and procedures governing operations, and impersonal relationships among members. Examples of formal organisations include corporations, government agencies, universities, and hospitals. Max Weber's concept of bureaucracy is a classic example of a formal organisation designed for rational and efficient goal attainment. The formal structure of these organisations aims to ensure coordination, accountability, and predictability in their operations, although it can sometimes lead to rigidity and a lack of flexibility.
The formal_Organisation_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Bureaucratic Rationalisation' Causal relation: {Bureaucratisation, Rationalisation} → bureaucratises → {Bureaucracy, Formal_Organisation} Semantical explanation of formal_Organisation_ID000002: A formal organisation is a special-purpose group designed and structured for maximum efficiency in achieving specific goals or objectives. These organisations are characterised by a hierarchical structure of authority, a clear division of labor based on specialised roles and responsibilities, formal rules and procedures governing operations, and impersonal relationships among members. Examples of formal organisations include corporations, government agencies, universities, and hospitals. Max Weber's concept of bureaucracy is a classic example of a formal organisation designed for rational and efficient goal attainment. The formal structure of these organisations aims to ensure coordination, accountability, and predictability in their operations, although it can sometimes lead to rigidity and a lack of flexibility.
The formal_Organisation_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Bureaucratisation and Social Rationalisation' Causal relation: {Bureaucracy, Rationalisation} → bureaucratises → {Alienation, Formal_Organisation} Semantical explanation of formal_Organisation_ID000003: A formal organisation is a special-purpose group designed and structured for maximum efficiency in achieving specific goals or objectives. These organisations are characterised by a hierarchical structure of authority, a clear division of labor based on specialised roles and responsibilities, formal rules and procedures governing operations, and impersonal relationships among members. Examples of formal organisations include corporations, government agencies, universities, and hospitals. Max Weber's concept of bureaucracy is a classic example of a formal organisation designed for rational and efficient goal attainment. The formal structure of these organisations aims to ensure coordination, accountability, and predictability in their operations, although it can sometimes lead to rigidity and a lack of flexibility.
The formal_Organisation_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Organisational Management Control' Causal relation: {Bureaucracy, Formal_Organisation} → manages → {Organisation, Invention} Semantical explanation of formal_Organisation_ID000004: A formal organisation is a special-purpose group designed and structured for maximum efficiency in achieving specific goals or objectives. These organisations are characterised by a hierarchical structure of authority, a clear division of labor based on specialised roles and responsibilities, formal rules and procedures governing operations, and impersonal relationships among members. Examples of formal organisations include corporations, government agencies, universities, and hospitals. Max Weber's concept of bureaucracy is a classic example of a formal organisation designed for rational and efficient goal attainment. The formal structure of these organisations aims to ensure coordination, accountability, and predictability in their operations, although it can sometimes lead to rigidity and a lack of flexibility.
The formal_Organisation_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Politics Influence Organisations' Causal relation: {Political_Systems_And_Governance_Form} → bureaucratises → {Formal_Organisation} Semantical explanation of formal_Organisation_ID000005: A formal organisation is a special-purpose group designed and structured for maximum efficiency in achieving specific goals or objectives. These organisations are characterised by a hierarchical structure of authority, a clear division of labor based on specialised roles and responsibilities, formal rules and procedures governing operations, and impersonal relationships among members. Examples of formal organisations include corporations, government agencies, universities, and hospitals. Max Weber's concept of bureaucracy is a classic example of a formal organisation designed for rational and efficient goal attainment. The formal structure of these organisations aims to ensure coordination, accountability, and predictability in their operations, although it can sometimes lead to rigidity and a lack of flexibility.
The formal_Organisation_ID000006 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Institutionalisation Processes' Causal relation: {Social_Institution, Formal_Organisation} → institutionalises → {Social_Structure, Organisation} Semantical explanation of formal_Organisation_ID000006: A formal organisation is a special-purpose group designed and structured for maximum efficiency in achieving specific goals or objectives. These organisations are characterised by a hierarchical structure of authority, a clear division of labor based on specialised roles and responsibilities, formal rules and procedures governing operations, and impersonal relationships among members. Examples of formal organisations include corporations, government agencies, universities, and hospitals. Max Weber's concept of bureaucracy is a classic example of a formal organisation designed for rational and efficient goal attainment. The formal structure of these organisations aims to ensure coordination, accountability, and predictability in their operations, although it can sometimes lead to rigidity and a lack of flexibility.
The formal_Social_Control_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Criminal Justice Punishment' Causal relation: {Capital_Punishment, Formal_Social_Control} → sanctions → {Crime, Rehabilitation} Semantical explanation of formal_Social_Control_ID000001: Formal social control refers to the mechanisms and processes used by authorised agents and institutions within society to maintain order, enforce laws, and ensure conformity to established norms and rules. These agents include police officers, judges, school administrators, employers, and other individuals who have been given the authority to enforce social norms and impose sanctions when violations occur. Formal social control is characterised by its reliance on written rules, laws, and regulations, as well as established procedures for identifying and punishing deviant behaviour. Examples of formal social control mechanisms include arrests, prosecutions, disciplinary actions, and legal penalties. It plays a crucial role in maintaining social stability and protecting societal values and interests, often working in conjunction with informal social control mechanisms, such as social disapproval and peer pressure.
The formal_Social_Control_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Control and Social Regulation' Causal relation: {Social_Institution, Law} → controls → {Social_Control, Formal_Social_Control} Semantical explanation of formal_Social_Control_ID000002: Formal social control refers to the mechanisms and processes used by authorised agents and institutions within society to maintain order, enforce laws, and ensure conformity to established norms and rules. These agents include police officers, judges, school administrators, employers, and other individuals who have been given the authority to enforce social norms and impose sanctions when violations occur. Formal social control is characterised by its reliance on written rules, laws, and regulations, as well as established procedures for identifying and punishing deviant behaviour. Examples of formal social control mechanisms include arrests, prosecutions, disciplinary actions, and legal penalties. It plays a crucial role in maintaining social stability and protecting societal values and interests, often working in conjunction with informal social control mechanisms, such as social disapproval and peer pressure.
The formal_Social_Control_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Legal Social Control Process' Causal relation: {Law, Formal_Social_Control} → regulates → {Crime, Deviance} Semantical explanation of formal_Social_Control_ID000003: Formal social control refers to the mechanisms and processes used by authorised agents and institutions within society to maintain order, enforce laws, and ensure conformity to established norms and rules. These agents include police officers, judges, school administrators, employers, and other individuals who have been given the authority to enforce social norms and impose sanctions when violations occur. Formal social control is characterised by its reliance on written rules, laws, and regulations, as well as established procedures for identifying and punishing deviant behaviour. Examples of formal social control mechanisms include arrests, prosecutions, disciplinary actions, and legal penalties. It plays a crucial role in maintaining social stability and protecting societal values and interests, often working in conjunction with informal social control mechanisms, such as social disapproval and peer pressure.
The formal_Social_Control_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Control and Crime Prevention' Causal relation: {Law, Social_Control} → controls → {Crime, Formal_Social_Control} Semantical explanation of formal_Social_Control_ID000004: Formal social control refers to the mechanisms and processes used by authorised agents and institutions within society to maintain order, enforce laws, and ensure conformity to established norms and rules. These agents include police officers, judges, school administrators, employers, and other individuals who have been given the authority to enforce social norms and impose sanctions when violations occur. Formal social control is characterised by its reliance on written rules, laws, and regulations, as well as established procedures for identifying and punishing deviant behaviour. Examples of formal social control mechanisms include arrests, prosecutions, disciplinary actions, and legal penalties. It plays a crucial role in maintaining social stability and protecting societal values and interests, often working in conjunction with informal social control mechanisms, such as social disapproval and peer pressure.
The formal_Social_Control_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Control and Deviance Prevention' Causal relation: {Social_Control, Formal_Social_Control} → controls → {Deviance, Informal_Social_Control} Semantical explanation of formal_Social_Control_ID000005: Formal social control refers to the mechanisms and processes used by authorised agents and institutions within society to maintain order, enforce laws, and ensure conformity to established norms and rules. These agents include police officers, judges, school administrators, employers, and other individuals who have been given the authority to enforce social norms and impose sanctions when violations occur. Formal social control is characterised by its reliance on written rules, laws, and regulations, as well as established procedures for identifying and punishing deviant behaviour. Examples of formal social control mechanisms include arrests, prosecutions, disciplinary actions, and legal penalties. It plays a crucial role in maintaining social stability and protecting societal values and interests, often working in conjunction with informal social control mechanisms, such as social disapproval and peer pressure.
The formal_Social_Control_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Regulation and Norm Enforcement' Causal relation: {Social_Control, Norm} → regulates → {Deviance, Formal_Social_Control} Semantical explanation of formal_Social_Control_ID000006: Formal social control refers to the mechanisms and processes used by authorised agents and institutions within society to maintain order, enforce laws, and ensure conformity to established norms and rules. These agents include police officers, judges, school administrators, employers, and other individuals who have been given the authority to enforce social norms and impose sanctions when violations occur. Formal social control is characterised by its reliance on written rules, laws, and regulations, as well as established procedures for identifying and punishing deviant behaviour. Examples of formal social control mechanisms include arrests, prosecutions, disciplinary actions, and legal penalties. It plays a crucial role in maintaining social stability and protecting societal values and interests, often working in conjunction with informal social control mechanisms, such as social disapproval and peer pressure.
The formal_Social_Control_ID000007 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Surveillance Social Control' Causal relation: {Formal_Social_Control, State} → monitors → {Observation, Social_Control} Semantical explanation of formal_Social_Control_ID000007: Formal social control refers to the mechanisms and processes used by authorised agents and institutions within society to maintain order, enforce laws, and ensure conformity to established norms and rules. These agents include police officers, judges, school administrators, employers, and other individuals who have been given the authority to enforce social norms and impose sanctions when violations occur. Formal social control is characterised by its reliance on written rules, laws, and regulations, as well as established procedures for identifying and punishing deviant behaviour. Examples of formal social control mechanisms include arrests, prosecutions, disciplinary actions, and legal penalties. It plays a crucial role in maintaining social stability and protecting societal values and interests, often working in conjunction with informal social control mechanisms, such as social disapproval and peer pressure.
The gender_Inequality_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Gender Employment Discrimination' Causal relation: {Gender_Inequality, Patriarchy} → discriminatesAgainst → {Gender_Stratification, Working_Class} Semantical explanation of gender_Inequality_ID000001: Gender inequality refers to the differences in the status, power, prestige, opportunities, and resources that women and men have in groups, collectivities, and societies. This inequality is often manifested in various forms, including disparities in economic opportunities and earnings (such as the gender pay gap), political representation and influence, access to education and healthcare, and social and cultural norms that privilege one gender over the other, typically men. Gender inequality is a pervasive issue across many societies, although its specific forms and extent can vary significantly across cultures and historical periods. Feminist theories in sociology aim to understand the social, cultural, and historical roots of gender inequality and to advocate for social change that promotes gender equality and justice.
The gender_Inequality_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Gender Stratification and Social Inequality' Causal relation: {Gender_Stratification, Patriarchy} → stratifies → {Gender_Inequality, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of gender_Inequality_ID000002: Gender inequality refers to the differences in the status, power, prestige, opportunities, and resources that women and men have in groups, collectivities, and societies. This inequality is often manifested in various forms, including disparities in economic opportunities and earnings (such as the gender pay gap), political representation and influence, access to education and healthcare, and social and cultural norms that privilege one gender over the other, typically men. Gender inequality is a pervasive issue across many societies, although its specific forms and extent can vary significantly across cultures and historical periods. Feminist theories in sociology aim to understand the social, cultural, and historical roots of gender inequality and to advocate for social change that promotes gender equality and justice.
The gender_Inequality_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Gender Stratification Creates Inequality' Causal relation: {Gender_Stratification} → stratifies → {Gender_Inequality} Semantical explanation of gender_Inequality_ID000003: Gender inequality refers to the differences in the status, power, prestige, opportunities, and resources that women and men have in groups, collectivities, and societies. This inequality is often manifested in various forms, including disparities in economic opportunities and earnings (such as the gender pay gap), political representation and influence, access to education and healthcare, and social and cultural norms that privilege one gender over the other, typically men. Gender inequality is a pervasive issue across many societies, although its specific forms and extent can vary significantly across cultures and historical periods. Feminist theories in sociology aim to understand the social, cultural, and historical roots of gender inequality and to advocate for social change that promotes gender equality and justice.
The gender_Inequality_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Discrimination and Social Exclusion' Causal relation: {Racism, Gender_Inequality} → discriminatesAgainst → {Social_Exclusion, Minority_Group} Semantical explanation of gender_Inequality_ID000004: Gender inequality refers to the differences in the status, power, prestige, opportunities, and resources that women and men have in groups, collectivities, and societies. This inequality is often manifested in various forms, including disparities in economic opportunities and earnings (such as the gender pay gap), political representation and influence, access to education and healthcare, and social and cultural norms that privilege one gender over the other, typically men. Gender inequality is a pervasive issue across many societies, although its specific forms and extent can vary significantly across cultures and historical periods. Feminist theories in sociology aim to understand the social, cultural, and historical roots of gender inequality and to advocate for social change that promotes gender equality and justice.
The gender_Inequality_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Patriarchal Systems and Gender Stratification' Causal relation: {Patriarchy, Gender_Role} → stratifies → {Gender_Inequality, Gender_Stratification} Semantical explanation of gender_Inequality_ID000005: Gender inequality refers to the differences in the status, power, prestige, opportunities, and resources that women and men have in groups, collectivities, and societies. This inequality is often manifested in various forms, including disparities in economic opportunities and earnings (such as the gender pay gap), political representation and influence, access to education and healthcare, and social and cultural norms that privilege one gender over the other, typically men. Gender inequality is a pervasive issue across many societies, although its specific forms and extent can vary significantly across cultures and historical periods. Feminist theories in sociology aim to understand the social, cultural, and historical roots of gender inequality and to advocate for social change that promotes gender equality and justice.
The gender_Order_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Patriarchal Authority Relations' Causal relation: {Patriarchy, Gender_Order} → subordinatedTo → {Authority, Gender_Role} Semantical explanation of gender_Order_ID000001: The gender order is a term associated with the writings of sociologist R. W. Connell that represents the overall patterns of power relations between masculinities and femininities that are widespread throughout society, shaping social institutions, interactions, and individual experiences. It encompasses the dominant cultural beliefs and practices that construct and maintain gender hierarchies, often privileging certain forms of masculinity while subordinating femininities and marginalised masculinities. The gender order is not static but is constantly being negotiated and contested through social interactions and power struggles. It influences everything from the division of labor in the household and the workplace to cultural representations of gender in media and the ways in which individuals perform their gender identities. Understanding the gender order is crucial for analysing and challenging systemic gender inequalities in society.
The gender_Role_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Patriarchal Authority Relations' Causal relation: {Patriarchy, Gender_Order} → subordinatedTo → {Authority, Gender_Role} Semantical explanation of gender_Role_ID000001: Gender roles are the social roles, behaviours, attitudes, and expectations that are considered appropriate, acceptable, or desirable for people based on their perceived sex or gender within a particular culture or society. These roles are often labeled as masculine or feminine and are learned through the process of socialisation from a young age, influenced by family, peers, education, media, and other social institutions. Gender roles can vary significantly across different cultures and can change over time within the same society. While they provide a framework for social interaction and can contribute to a sense of identity, they can also be restrictive and contribute to gender stereotypes and inequalities by limiting individuals' opportunities and expressions based on societal expectations of their gender. The study of gender roles in sociology examines how they are constructed, maintained, and challenged, and their impact on individuals and social structures.
The gender_Role_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Patriarchal Systems and Gender Stratification' Causal relation: {Patriarchy, Gender_Role} → stratifies → {Gender_Inequality, Gender_Stratification} Semantical explanation of gender_Role_ID000002: Gender roles are the social roles, behaviours, attitudes, and expectations that are considered appropriate, acceptable, or desirable for people based on their perceived sex or gender within a particular culture or society. These roles are often labeled as masculine or feminine and are learned through the process of socialisation from a young age, influenced by family, peers, education, media, and other social institutions. Gender roles can vary significantly across different cultures and can change over time within the same society. While they provide a framework for social interaction and can contribute to a sense of identity, they can also be restrictive and contribute to gender stereotypes and inequalities by limiting individuals' opportunities and expressions based on societal expectations of their gender. The study of gender roles in sociology examines how they are constructed, maintained, and challenged, and their impact on individuals and social structures.
The gender_Stratification_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Gender Employment Discrimination' Causal relation: {Gender_Inequality, Patriarchy} → discriminatesAgainst → {Gender_Stratification, Working_Class} Semantical explanation of gender_Stratification_ID000001: Gender stratification refers to a society's unequal distribution of wealth, power, and privilege between the two sexes, with one gender (typically men) holding a disproportionate share of these resources and social advantages. This hierarchical arrangement is evident in various aspects of social life, including the economic sphere (e.g., the gender pay gap, occupational segregation), the political arena (e.g., underrepresentation of women in leadership positions), and social institutions (e.g., differential treatment in education and healthcare). Gender stratification is not simply a matter of individual differences but is embedded in the social structure and perpetuated by cultural norms, beliefs, and practices that often favour men and disadvantage women. Feminist theories in sociology critically examine the causes and consequences of gender stratification and advocate for social equality between the sexes.
The gender_Stratification_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Gender Stratification and Social Inequality' Causal relation: {Gender_Stratification, Patriarchy} → stratifies → {Gender_Inequality, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of gender_Stratification_ID000002: Gender stratification refers to a society's unequal distribution of wealth, power, and privilege between the two sexes, with one gender (typically men) holding a disproportionate share of these resources and social advantages. This hierarchical arrangement is evident in various aspects of social life, including the economic sphere (e.g., the gender pay gap, occupational segregation), the political arena (e.g., underrepresentation of women in leadership positions), and social institutions (e.g., differential treatment in education and healthcare). Gender stratification is not simply a matter of individual differences but is embedded in the social structure and perpetuated by cultural norms, beliefs, and practices that often favour men and disadvantage women. Feminist theories in sociology critically examine the causes and consequences of gender stratification and advocate for social equality between the sexes.
The gender_Stratification_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Gender Stratification Creates Inequality' Causal relation: {Gender_Stratification} → stratifies → {Gender_Inequality} Semantical explanation of gender_Stratification_ID000003: Gender stratification refers to a society's unequal distribution of wealth, power, and privilege between the two sexes, with one gender (typically men) holding a disproportionate share of these resources and social advantages. This hierarchical arrangement is evident in various aspects of social life, including the economic sphere (e.g., the gender pay gap, occupational segregation), the political arena (e.g., underrepresentation of women in leadership positions), and social institutions (e.g., differential treatment in education and healthcare). Gender stratification is not simply a matter of individual differences but is embedded in the social structure and perpetuated by cultural norms, beliefs, and practices that often favour men and disadvantage women. Feminist theories in sociology critically examine the causes and consequences of gender stratification and advocate for social equality between the sexes.
The gender_Stratification_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Patriarchal Systems and Gender Stratification' Causal relation: {Patriarchy, Gender_Role} → stratifies → {Gender_Inequality, Gender_Stratification} Semantical explanation of gender_Stratification_ID000004: Gender stratification refers to a society's unequal distribution of wealth, power, and privilege between the two sexes, with one gender (typically men) holding a disproportionate share of these resources and social advantages. This hierarchical arrangement is evident in various aspects of social life, including the economic sphere (e.g., the gender pay gap, occupational segregation), the political arena (e.g., underrepresentation of women in leadership positions), and social institutions (e.g., differential treatment in education and healthcare). Gender stratification is not simply a matter of individual differences but is embedded in the social structure and perpetuated by cultural norms, beliefs, and practices that often favour men and disadvantage women. Feminist theories in sociology critically examine the causes and consequences of gender stratification and advocate for social equality between the sexes.
The gentrification_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Gentrification and Residential Displacement' Causal relation: {Gentrification, Urban_Renewal} → excludes → {Working_Class, Poverty} Semantical explanation of gentrification_ID000001: Gentrification is a process of urban renewal in which older, decaying housing and neighborhoods in central city areas are refurbished and revitalised by more affluent people, often resulting in the displacement of the original, lower-income residents. This process typically involves the renovation of buildings, the influx of new businesses and amenities catering to a higher-income clientele, and an increase in property values and rents, making the area unaffordable for many of its long-term residents. While gentrification can lead to the physical improvement of neglected urban areas, it often raises concerns about social equity and the displacement of vulnerable populations, potentially leading to the loss of affordable housing and the disruption of established communities. The causes and consequences of gentrification are complex and have been a subject of much sociological research and debate, with discussions focusing on issues of urban planning, housing policy, and social justice.
The gentrification_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Gentrification Transforms Neighborhoods' Causal relation: {Gentrification} → gentrifies → {Working_Class} Semantical explanation of gentrification_ID000002: Gentrification is a process of urban renewal in which older, decaying housing and neighborhoods in central city areas are refurbished and revitalised by more affluent people, often resulting in the displacement of the original, lower-income residents. This process typically involves the renovation of buildings, the influx of new businesses and amenities catering to a higher-income clientele, and an increase in property values and rents, making the area unaffordable for many of its long-term residents. While gentrification can lead to the physical improvement of neglected urban areas, it often raises concerns about social equity and the displacement of vulnerable populations, potentially leading to the loss of affordable housing and the disruption of established communities. The causes and consequences of gentrification are complex and have been a subject of much sociological research and debate, with discussions focusing on issues of urban planning, housing policy, and social justice.
The gentrification_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Urban Gentrification and Social Displacement' Causal relation: {Gentrification, Urban_Renewal} → gentrifies → {Working_Class, Social_Class} Semantical explanation of gentrification_ID000003: Gentrification is a process of urban renewal in which older, decaying housing and neighborhoods in central city areas are refurbished and revitalised by more affluent people, often resulting in the displacement of the original, lower-income residents. This process typically involves the renovation of buildings, the influx of new businesses and amenities catering to a higher-income clientele, and an increase in property values and rents, making the area unaffordable for many of its long-term residents. While gentrification can lead to the physical improvement of neglected urban areas, it often raises concerns about social equity and the displacement of vulnerable populations, potentially leading to the loss of affordable housing and the disruption of established communities. The causes and consequences of gentrification are complex and have been a subject of much sociological research and debate, with discussions focusing on issues of urban planning, housing policy, and social justice.
The gentrification_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Urban Gentrification Displacement' Causal relation: {Gentrification, Urban_Renewal} → gentrifies → {Working_Class, Social_Exclusion} Semantical explanation of gentrification_ID000004: Gentrification is a process of urban renewal in which older, decaying housing and neighborhoods in central city areas are refurbished and revitalised by more affluent people, often resulting in the displacement of the original, lower-income residents. This process typically involves the renovation of buildings, the influx of new businesses and amenities catering to a higher-income clientele, and an increase in property values and rents, making the area unaffordable for many of its long-term residents. While gentrification can lead to the physical improvement of neglected urban areas, it often raises concerns about social equity and the displacement of vulnerable populations, potentially leading to the loss of affordable housing and the disruption of established communities. The causes and consequences of gentrification are complex and have been a subject of much sociological research and debate, with discussions focusing on issues of urban planning, housing policy, and social justice.
The global_Village_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Global Influence and Cultural Exchange' Causal relation: {Global_Village, Internet} → hasInfluence → {Culture, Social_Change, Social_Role} Semantical explanation of global_Village_ID000001: Global village is a notion associated with the Canadian writer and media theorist Marshall McLuhan, who envisioned the spread of electronic communication technologies, such as television and later the internet, as binding the world into a single, interconnected community, akin to a small village where everyone knows everyone else and information travels rapidly. McLuhan argued that electronic media collapses time and space, allowing people from different parts of the world to interact and share experiences in real-time, fostering a sense of global interconnectedness and shared consciousness. While the "global village" concept highlights the potential for increased communication and understanding across cultures, it has also been critiqued for overlooking issues of power imbalances, cultural homogenisation, and the digital divide that exists in access to technology and information worldwide.
The government_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Government Governs Society' Causal relation: {Government} → governs → {Social_Control} Semantical explanation of government_ID000001: Government refers to the regular enactment of policies, decisions, and matters of state by officials within a political apparatus, representing the formal organisation that has the authority to make and enforce laws and regulations within a specific territory or society. It encompasses the various institutions and processes through which a state exercises its power and authority, including legislative bodies that create laws, executive branches that implement and enforce them, and judicial systems that interpret laws and resolve disputes. Governments play a crucial role in maintaining social order, providing public services, regulating the economy, and representing the interests of the state in its interactions with other nations. The form and structure of government can vary widely, ranging from democracies to authoritarian regimes, each with different mechanisms for the selection of officials and the exercise of power. Political sociology examines the role of government in society, its relationship with citizens and other social institutions, and the factors that influence its policies and actions.
The government_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Political Authority and Social Control' Causal relation: {Government, Bureaucracy} → governs → {Social_Control, Law} Semantical explanation of government_ID000002: Government refers to the regular enactment of policies, decisions, and matters of state by officials within a political apparatus, representing the formal organisation that has the authority to make and enforce laws and regulations within a specific territory or society. It encompasses the various institutions and processes through which a state exercises its power and authority, including legislative bodies that create laws, executive branches that implement and enforce them, and judicial systems that interpret laws and resolve disputes. Governments play a crucial role in maintaining social order, providing public services, regulating the economy, and representing the interests of the state in its interactions with other nations. The form and structure of government can vary widely, ranging from democracies to authoritarian regimes, each with different mechanisms for the selection of officials and the exercise of power. Political sociology examines the role of government in society, its relationship with citizens and other social institutions, and the factors that influence its policies and actions.
The government_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Power and Political Control' Causal relation: {Power, Authority} → controls → {Government, Social_Control} Semantical explanation of government_ID000003: Government refers to the regular enactment of policies, decisions, and matters of state by officials within a political apparatus, representing the formal organisation that has the authority to make and enforce laws and regulations within a specific territory or society. It encompasses the various institutions and processes through which a state exercises its power and authority, including legislative bodies that create laws, executive branches that implement and enforce them, and judicial systems that interpret laws and resolve disputes. Governments play a crucial role in maintaining social order, providing public services, regulating the economy, and representing the interests of the state in its interactions with other nations. The form and structure of government can vary widely, ranging from democracies to authoritarian regimes, each with different mechanisms for the selection of officials and the exercise of power. Political sociology examines the role of government in society, its relationship with citizens and other social institutions, and the factors that influence its policies and actions.
The government_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Movements and Political Challenge' Causal relation: {Social_Movement, Resource_Mobilisation} → protests → {Political_System, Government} Semantical explanation of government_ID000004: Government refers to the regular enactment of policies, decisions, and matters of state by officials within a political apparatus, representing the formal organisation that has the authority to make and enforce laws and regulations within a specific territory or society. It encompasses the various institutions and processes through which a state exercises its power and authority, including legislative bodies that create laws, executive branches that implement and enforce them, and judicial systems that interpret laws and resolve disputes. Governments play a crucial role in maintaining social order, providing public services, regulating the economy, and representing the interests of the state in its interactions with other nations. The form and structure of government can vary widely, ranging from democracies to authoritarian regimes, each with different mechanisms for the selection of officials and the exercise of power. Political sociology examines the role of government in society, its relationship with citizens and other social institutions, and the factors that influence its policies and actions.
The government_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'State Social Control Mechanisms' Causal relation: {State, Government} → regulates → {Social_Control, Law} Semantical explanation of government_ID000005: Government refers to the regular enactment of policies, decisions, and matters of state by officials within a political apparatus, representing the formal organisation that has the authority to make and enforce laws and regulations within a specific territory or society. It encompasses the various institutions and processes through which a state exercises its power and authority, including legislative bodies that create laws, executive branches that implement and enforce them, and judicial systems that interpret laws and resolve disputes. Governments play a crucial role in maintaining social order, providing public services, regulating the economy, and representing the interests of the state in its interactions with other nations. The form and structure of government can vary widely, ranging from democracies to authoritarian regimes, each with different mechanisms for the selection of officials and the exercise of power. Political sociology examines the role of government in society, its relationship with citizens and other social institutions, and the factors that influence its policies and actions.
The government_ID000006 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Urban Planning and Spatial Organisation' Causal relation: {Government, Bureaucracy} → regulates → {Urbanism, Organisation} Semantical explanation of government_ID000006: Government refers to the regular enactment of policies, decisions, and matters of state by officials within a political apparatus, representing the formal organisation that has the authority to make and enforce laws and regulations within a specific territory or society. It encompasses the various institutions and processes through which a state exercises its power and authority, including legislative bodies that create laws, executive branches that implement and enforce them, and judicial systems that interpret laws and resolve disputes. Governments play a crucial role in maintaining social order, providing public services, regulating the economy, and representing the interests of the state in its interactions with other nations. The form and structure of government can vary widely, ranging from democracies to authoritarian regimes, each with different mechanisms for the selection of officials and the exercise of power. Political sociology examines the role of government in society, its relationship with citizens and other social institutions, and the factors that influence its policies and actions.
The group_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Community Mobilisation and Local Development' Causal relation: {Group, Social_Mobility} → mobilises → {Social_Change, Social_Structure} Semantical explanation of group_ID000001: In sociology, a group is defined as any number of people with similar norms, values, and expectations who interact with one another on a regular basis, developing a sense of shared identity and belonging. The size of a group can range from a small dyad (two people) to large-scale organisations or even broader social categories. What distinguishes a group from a mere collection of individuals is the presence of ongoing social interaction, shared norms and values that guide behaviour, and a sense of mutual awareness and interdependence among members. Groups play a fundamental role in social life, providing individuals with social support, a sense of identity, and a context for social interaction and the development of social norms. Sociologists study groups to understand group dynamics, social influence, conformity, leadership, and the ways in which groups shape individual behaviour and social structures.
The health_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Poverty and Social Disadvantage' Causal relation: {Poverty, Underdevelopment} → causallyInfluencedBy → {Crime, Health} Semantical explanation of health_ID000001: As defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO), health is a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being, and not merely the absence of disease and infirmity. This definition emphasises a holistic view of health that goes beyond just the absence of illness to include the overall quality of an individual's physical, psychological, and social functioning and resources. It recognises that health is influenced by a complex interplay of biological, psychological, social, economic, and environmental factors. Achieving and maintaining health requires attention to all these dimensions and involves promoting well-being in all aspects of life. This broad definition underscores the sociological perspective on health, which examines how social factors shape health outcomes and inequalities within and between populations.
The health_Maintenance_Org_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Healthcare Mobilisation and Public Health' Causal relation: {Healthcare} → mobilises → {Mortality_Rate, Health_Maintenance_Org, Social_Epidemiology} Semantical explanation of health_Maintenance_Org_ID000001: Health maintenance organisations (HMOs) are a type of managed healthcare organisation that provides comprehensive medical services to its enrolled members for a preestablished fee, typically paid on a monthly basis, regardless of how often the services are used. HMOs aim to control healthcare costs by emphasizing preventive care and requiring members to choose a primary care physician (PCP) who acts as a gatekeeper, coordinating their care and providing referrals to specialists when necessary. HMOs often have a network of doctors, hospitals, and other healthcare providers that members must use to receive coverage, except in cases of emergency. While HMOs can help to make healthcare more affordable and predictable in terms of cost, they have also been criticised for potentially limiting patients' choice of providers and sometimes prioritizing cost-cutting over the quality of care.
The health_Maintenance_Org_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Healthcare Social Control' Causal relation: {Healthcare, Health_Maintenance_Org} → medicinalises → {Social_Control, Sick_Role} Semantical explanation of health_Maintenance_Org_ID000002: Health maintenance organisations (HMOs) are a type of managed healthcare organisation that provides comprehensive medical services to its enrolled members for a preestablished fee, typically paid on a monthly basis, regardless of how often the services are used. HMOs aim to control healthcare costs by emphasizing preventive care and requiring members to choose a primary care physician (PCP) who acts as a gatekeeper, coordinating their care and providing referrals to specialists when necessary. HMOs often have a network of doctors, hospitals, and other healthcare providers that members must use to receive coverage, except in cases of emergency. While HMOs can help to make healthcare more affordable and predictable in terms of cost, they have also been criticised for potentially limiting patients' choice of providers and sometimes prioritizing cost-cutting over the quality of care.
The healthcare_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Healthcare Mobilisation and Public Health' Causal relation: {Healthcare} → mobilises → {Mortality_Rate, Health_Maintenance_Org, Social_Epidemiology} Semantical explanation of healthcare_ID000001: Healthcare, in sociology, refers to the social institution and complex system of organisations, professionals, and practices dedicated to maintaining and improving the physical, mental, and social well-being of individuals and populations. This domain encompasses a wide range of services, including medical diagnosis and treatment, disease prevention, health promotion, rehabilitation, and palliative care. Sociologists examine the social determinants of health and illness, investigating how factors like socioeconomic status, race, gender, and geographic location influence health disparities and access to care. The study of healthcare also analyses the social organisation of medical practices, the roles of healthcare providers and patients, the social construction of health and illness (e.g., the sick role), and the impact of health maintenance organisations (HMOs) and holistic medicine approaches. It critically assesses healthcare policies, inequalities in health outcomes, and the broader societal implications of health and disease.
The healthcare_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Healthcare Social Control' Causal relation: {Healthcare, Health_Maintenance_Org} → medicinalises → {Social_Control, Sick_Role} Semantical explanation of healthcare_ID000002: Healthcare, in sociology, refers to the social institution and complex system of organisations, professionals, and practices dedicated to maintaining and improving the physical, mental, and social well-being of individuals and populations. This domain encompasses a wide range of services, including medical diagnosis and treatment, disease prevention, health promotion, rehabilitation, and palliative care. Sociologists examine the social determinants of health and illness, investigating how factors like socioeconomic status, race, gender, and geographic location influence health disparities and access to care. The study of healthcare also analyses the social organisation of medical practices, the roles of healthcare providers and patients, the social construction of health and illness (e.g., the sick role), and the impact of health maintenance organisations (HMOs) and holistic medicine approaches. It critically assesses healthcare policies, inequalities in health outcomes, and the broader societal implications of health and disease.
The healthcare_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'State Welfare and Social Redistribution' Causal relation: {State, Healthcare} → provides → {Social_Inequality, Poverty} Semantical explanation of healthcare_ID000003: Healthcare, in sociology, refers to the social institution and complex system of organisations, professionals, and practices dedicated to maintaining and improving the physical, mental, and social well-being of individuals and populations. This domain encompasses a wide range of services, including medical diagnosis and treatment, disease prevention, health promotion, rehabilitation, and palliative care. Sociologists examine the social determinants of health and illness, investigating how factors like socioeconomic status, race, gender, and geographic location influence health disparities and access to care. The study of healthcare also analyses the social organisation of medical practices, the roles of healthcare providers and patients, the social construction of health and illness (e.g., the sick role), and the impact of health maintenance organisations (HMOs) and holistic medicine approaches. It critically assesses healthcare policies, inequalities in health outcomes, and the broader societal implications of health and disease.
The healthcare_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Technology and Social Change' Causal relation: {Innovation, Healthcare} → influencesHistorically → {Social_Change, Holistic_Medicine} Semantical explanation of healthcare_ID000004: Healthcare, in sociology, refers to the social institution and complex system of organisations, professionals, and practices dedicated to maintaining and improving the physical, mental, and social well-being of individuals and populations. This domain encompasses a wide range of services, including medical diagnosis and treatment, disease prevention, health promotion, rehabilitation, and palliative care. Sociologists examine the social determinants of health and illness, investigating how factors like socioeconomic status, race, gender, and geographic location influence health disparities and access to care. The study of healthcare also analyses the social organisation of medical practices, the roles of healthcare providers and patients, the social construction of health and illness (e.g., the sick role), and the impact of health maintenance organisations (HMOs) and holistic medicine approaches. It critically assesses healthcare policies, inequalities in health outcomes, and the broader societal implications of health and disease.
The hegemony_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Hegemony Establishment' Causal relation: {Hegemony, Power_Elite} → controls → {Culture, Mass_Media} Semantical explanation of hegemony_ID000001: Hegemony, in a sociological context, refers to the means by which a ruling or dominant group wins over a subordinate group through ideas, values, beliefs, and cultural norms, rather than primarily through force or coercion. This concept, often associated with the work of Antonio Gramsci, describes a process where the dominant group's ideology becomes widely accepted as common sense or the natural order of things, even by those who are disadvantaged by it, thereby maintaining the dominant group's power and control. Hegemony operates by shaping people's perceptions, preferences, and understandings of the world in ways that support the status quo. It is a subtle form of power that works through cultural influence and the shaping of consciousness, making social inequalities seem legitimate or inevitable.
The hegemony_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media Information Control' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Power_Elite} → controls → {Public_Sphere, Hegemony} Semantical explanation of hegemony_ID000002: Hegemony, in a sociological context, refers to the means by which a ruling or dominant group wins over a subordinate group through ideas, values, beliefs, and cultural norms, rather than primarily through force or coercion. This concept, often associated with the work of Antonio Gramsci, describes a process where the dominant group's ideology becomes widely accepted as common sense or the natural order of things, even by those who are disadvantaged by it, thereby maintaining the dominant group's power and control. Hegemony operates by shaping people's perceptions, preferences, and understandings of the world in ways that support the status quo. It is a subtle form of power that works through cultural influence and the shaping of consciousness, making social inequalities seem legitimate or inevitable.
The hidden_Curriculum_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Social Reproduction' Causal relation: {Education, Hidden_Curriculum} → reproduces → {Cultural_Reproduction, Social_Class} Semantical explanation of hidden_Curriculum_ID000001: The hidden curriculum refers to the unstated or subtle standards of behaviour, attitudes, values, and beliefs that are deemed proper by society and are taught implicitly in schools through the everyday practices, routines, and social interactions within the educational environment, rather than through the formal academic curriculum. This can include learning about punctuality, obedience to authority, competition, conformity to rules, and the importance of social hierarchies. The hidden curriculum plays a significant role in the socialisation of students, shaping their understanding of social norms, expectations, and power dynamics in ways that may not be explicitly stated but are nonetheless influential in preparing them for their roles in the broader society and the workplace. Sociologists study the hidden curriculum to understand how schools contribute to the reproduction of social inequalities and the transmission of dominant cultural values.
The hidden_Curriculum_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Formal Educational Socialisation' Causal relation: {Education, Hidden_Curriculum} → educates → {Secondary_Socialisation, Cultural_Capital} Semantical explanation of hidden_Curriculum_ID000002: The hidden curriculum refers to the unstated or subtle standards of behaviour, attitudes, values, and beliefs that are deemed proper by society and are taught implicitly in schools through the everyday practices, routines, and social interactions within the educational environment, rather than through the formal academic curriculum. This can include learning about punctuality, obedience to authority, competition, conformity to rules, and the importance of social hierarchies. The hidden curriculum plays a significant role in the socialisation of students, shaping their understanding of social norms, expectations, and power dynamics in ways that may not be explicitly stated but are nonetheless influential in preparing them for their roles in the broader society and the workplace. Sociologists study the hidden curriculum to understand how schools contribute to the reproduction of social inequalities and the transmission of dominant cultural values.
The holistic_Medicine_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Technology and Social Change' Causal relation: {Innovation, Healthcare} → influencesHistorically → {Social_Change, Holistic_Medicine} Semantical explanation of holistic_Medicine_ID000001: Holistic medicine is an approach to health maintenance and healthcare that uses therapies in which the healthcare practitioner considers the whole person – their physical, mental, emotional, social, and spiritual characteristics – rather than focusing solely on the physical symptoms of an illness. This approach emphasises the interconnectedness of these different aspects of well-being and aims to treat the root causes of illness by addressing the individual's overall health and lifestyle. Holistic practitioners may use a variety of therapeutic modalities, including lifestyle changes, stress reduction techniques, nutritional guidance, exercise programs, and complementary and alternative therapies, in addition to conventional medical treatments, to promote healing and well-being. The focus is on treating the individual as a whole and empowering them to take an active role in their own health and healing process.
The identity_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Anticipatory Socialisation and Status Preparation' Causal relation: {Anticipatory_Socialisation, Role_Taking} → socialises → {Status, Identity} Semantical explanation of identity_ID000001: Identity refers to the distinctive characteristics of a person's character or the character of a group which relate to who they are and what is meaningful to them, providing a sense of self and belonging. Some of the main sources of identity include gender, encompassing social expectations of masculinity and femininity; sexual orientation, referring to patterns of emotional, romantic, and sexual attraction; nationality or ethnicity, based on shared cultural heritage, origin, and often language or religion; and social class, reflecting one's position in the socioeconomic hierarchy. Identity is not fixed but is fluid and can evolve over an individual's life course through interactions with others and within different social contexts. It shapes how individuals perceive themselves and how they are perceived by others, influencing their social interactions, opportunities, and experiences within society.
The identity_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Influence and Identity Formation' Causal relation: {Culture, Value} → hasInfluence → {Identity, Social_Role} Semantical explanation of identity_ID000002: Identity refers to the distinctive characteristics of a person's character or the character of a group which relate to who they are and what is meaningful to them, providing a sense of self and belonging. Some of the main sources of identity include gender, encompassing social expectations of masculinity and femininity; sexual orientation, referring to patterns of emotional, romantic, and sexual attraction; nationality or ethnicity, based on shared cultural heritage, origin, and often language or religion; and social class, reflecting one's position in the socioeconomic hierarchy. Identity is not fixed but is fluid and can evolve over an individual's life course through interactions with others and within different social contexts. It shapes how individuals perceive themselves and how they are perceived by others, influencing their social interactions, opportunities, and experiences within society.
The identity_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Resocialisation' Causal relation: {Total_Institution, Degradation_Ceremony} → resocialises → {Resocialisation, Identity} Semantical explanation of identity_ID000003: Identity refers to the distinctive characteristics of a person's character or the character of a group which relate to who they are and what is meaningful to them, providing a sense of self and belonging. Some of the main sources of identity include gender, encompassing social expectations of masculinity and femininity; sexual orientation, referring to patterns of emotional, romantic, and sexual attraction; nationality or ethnicity, based on shared cultural heritage, origin, and often language or religion; and social class, reflecting one's position in the socioeconomic hierarchy. Identity is not fixed but is fluid and can evolve over an individual's life course through interactions with others and within different social contexts. It shapes how individuals perceive themselves and how they are perceived by others, influencing their social interactions, opportunities, and experiences within society.
The identity_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Resocialisation and Identity Change' Causal relation: {Resocialisation, Total_Institution} → governs → {Identity, Social_Role} Semantical explanation of identity_ID000004: Identity refers to the distinctive characteristics of a person's character or the character of a group which relate to who they are and what is meaningful to them, providing a sense of self and belonging. Some of the main sources of identity include gender, encompassing social expectations of masculinity and femininity; sexual orientation, referring to patterns of emotional, romantic, and sexual attraction; nationality or ethnicity, based on shared cultural heritage, origin, and often language or religion; and social class, reflecting one's position in the socioeconomic hierarchy. Identity is not fixed but is fluid and can evolve over an individual's life course through interactions with others and within different social contexts. It shapes how individuals perceive themselves and how they are perceived by others, influencing their social interactions, opportunities, and experiences within society.
The identity_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Nationalism and State Formation' Causal relation: {Nation_State, Nationalism} → socialises → {Politics, Identity} Semantical explanation of identity_ID000005: Identity refers to the distinctive characteristics of a person's character or the character of a group which relate to who they are and what is meaningful to them, providing a sense of self and belonging. Some of the main sources of identity include gender, encompassing social expectations of masculinity and femininity; sexual orientation, referring to patterns of emotional, romantic, and sexual attraction; nationality or ethnicity, based on shared cultural heritage, origin, and often language or religion; and social class, reflecting one's position in the socioeconomic hierarchy. Identity is not fixed but is fluid and can evolve over an individual's life course through interactions with others and within different social contexts. It shapes how individuals perceive themselves and how they are perceived by others, influencing their social interactions, opportunities, and experiences within society.
The identity_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Peer Group Socialisation and Identity Formation' Causal relation: {Peer_Group, Social_Network} → socialises → {Identity, Socialisation} Semantical explanation of identity_ID000006: Identity refers to the distinctive characteristics of a person's character or the character of a group which relate to who they are and what is meaningful to them, providing a sense of self and belonging. Some of the main sources of identity include gender, encompassing social expectations of masculinity and femininity; sexual orientation, referring to patterns of emotional, romantic, and sexual attraction; nationality or ethnicity, based on shared cultural heritage, origin, and often language or religion; and social class, reflecting one's position in the socioeconomic hierarchy. Identity is not fixed but is fluid and can evolve over an individual's life course through interactions with others and within different social contexts. It shapes how individuals perceive themselves and how they are perceived by others, influencing their social interactions, opportunities, and experiences within society.
The identity_ID000007 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Primary Socialisation and Identity Formation' Causal relation: {Primary_Socialisation, Family, Education} → socialises → {Identity, Value, Social_Role} Semantical explanation of identity_ID000007: Identity refers to the distinctive characteristics of a person's character or the character of a group which relate to who they are and what is meaningful to them, providing a sense of self and belonging. Some of the main sources of identity include gender, encompassing social expectations of masculinity and femininity; sexual orientation, referring to patterns of emotional, romantic, and sexual attraction; nationality or ethnicity, based on shared cultural heritage, origin, and often language or religion; and social class, reflecting one's position in the socioeconomic hierarchy. Identity is not fixed but is fluid and can evolve over an individual's life course through interactions with others and within different social contexts. It shapes how individuals perceive themselves and how they are perceived by others, influencing their social interactions, opportunities, and experiences within society.
The identity_ID000008 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Media and Network Society' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Network} → influencesHistorically → {Identity, Social_Network} Semantical explanation of identity_ID000008: Identity refers to the distinctive characteristics of a person's character or the character of a group which relate to who they are and what is meaningful to them, providing a sense of self and belonging. Some of the main sources of identity include gender, encompassing social expectations of masculinity and femininity; sexual orientation, referring to patterns of emotional, romantic, and sexual attraction; nationality or ethnicity, based on shared cultural heritage, origin, and often language or religion; and social class, reflecting one's position in the socioeconomic hierarchy. Identity is not fixed but is fluid and can evolve over an individual's life course through interactions with others and within different social contexts. It shapes how individuals perceive themselves and how they are perceived by others, influencing their social interactions, opportunities, and experiences within society.
The identity_ID000009 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Stigmatisation and Identity Management' Causal relation: {Stigma, Labeling_Theory} → stigmatises → {Identity, Social_Exclusion} Semantical explanation of identity_ID000009: Identity refers to the distinctive characteristics of a person's character or the character of a group which relate to who they are and what is meaningful to them, providing a sense of self and belonging. Some of the main sources of identity include gender, encompassing social expectations of masculinity and femininity; sexual orientation, referring to patterns of emotional, romantic, and sexual attraction; nationality or ethnicity, based on shared cultural heritage, origin, and often language or religion; and social class, reflecting one's position in the socioeconomic hierarchy. Identity is not fixed but is fluid and can evolve over an individual's life course through interactions with others and within different social contexts. It shapes how individuals perceive themselves and how they are perceived by others, influencing their social interactions, opportunities, and experiences within society.
The identity_ID000010 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Stigma Stigmatises Individuals' Causal relation: {Stigma} → stigmatises → {Identity} Semantical explanation of identity_ID000010: Identity refers to the distinctive characteristics of a person's character or the character of a group which relate to who they are and what is meaningful to them, providing a sense of self and belonging. Some of the main sources of identity include gender, encompassing social expectations of masculinity and femininity; sexual orientation, referring to patterns of emotional, romantic, and sexual attraction; nationality or ethnicity, based on shared cultural heritage, origin, and often language or religion; and social class, reflecting one's position in the socioeconomic hierarchy. Identity is not fixed but is fluid and can evolve over an individual's life course through interactions with others and within different social contexts. It shapes how individuals perceive themselves and how they are perceived by others, influencing their social interactions, opportunities, and experiences within society.
The immigration_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Immigration and Cultural Integration' Causal relation: {Immigration, Cultural_Diversity} → influencesHistorically → {Cultural_Pluralism, Culture_Shock} Semantical explanation of immigration_ID000001: Immigration is the movement of people into one country from another with the intention of settling permanently or for an extended period. This cross-border migration can occur for a variety of reasons, including seeking better economic opportunities, escaping poverty, conflict, or persecution, joining family members, or pursuing education and personal development. Immigration has significant social, economic, and cultural impacts on both the sending and receiving countries, contributing to population growth and diversity, influencing labor markets, and shaping cultural landscapes. The experiences of immigrants can vary widely depending on factors such as their reasons for migrating, their skills and resources, the policies and attitudes of the host country, and the presence of established immigrant communities.
The immigration_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Population Migration Patterns' Causal relation: {Migration, Immigration} → migrates → {Diaspora, Push_And_Pull_Factor} Semantical explanation of immigration_ID000002: Immigration is the movement of people into one country from another with the intention of settling permanently or for an extended period. This cross-border migration can occur for a variety of reasons, including seeking better economic opportunities, escaping poverty, conflict, or persecution, joining family members, or pursuing education and personal development. Immigration has significant social, economic, and cultural impacts on both the sending and receiving countries, contributing to population growth and diversity, influencing labor markets, and shaping cultural landscapes. The experiences of immigrants can vary widely depending on factors such as their reasons for migrating, their skills and resources, the policies and attitudes of the host country, and the presence of established immigrant communities.
The industrial_City_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Industrial Revolution and Urban Development' Causal relation: {Industrial_Revolution, Industrialism} → urbanises → {Industrial_City, Working_Class} Semantical explanation of industrial_City_ID000001: An industrial city is a type of urban center characterised by its relatively large size and population density, a dynamic and often competitive environment, a more open class system compared to pre-industrial societies, and a significant level of elaborate specialisation in the manufacturing of goods and the provision of related services. These cities emerged and grew rapidly during the Industrial Revolution, becoming centers of production, innovation, and migration, attracting large numbers of people seeking employment in factories and related industries. The social structure of industrial cities often reflects a greater degree of social mobility based on achieved status compared to more traditional, agrarian-based societies. However, they can also be characterised by social inequalities and challenges associated with rapid urbanisation, such as overcrowding, pollution, and the development of distinct social and economic neighborhoods.
The industrial_City_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Industrial Urban Development' Causal relation: {Industrial_City, Industrialism} → urbanises → {Urban_Ecology, Postindustrial_City} Semantical explanation of industrial_City_ID000002: An industrial city is a type of urban center characterised by its relatively large size and population density, a dynamic and often competitive environment, a more open class system compared to pre-industrial societies, and a significant level of elaborate specialisation in the manufacturing of goods and the provision of related services. These cities emerged and grew rapidly during the Industrial Revolution, becoming centers of production, innovation, and migration, attracting large numbers of people seeking employment in factories and related industries. The social structure of industrial cities often reflects a greater degree of social mobility based on achieved status compared to more traditional, agrarian-based societies. However, they can also be characterised by social inequalities and challenges associated with rapid urbanisation, such as overcrowding, pollution, and the development of distinct social and economic neighborhoods.
The industrial_Revolution_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Industrial Revolution and Urban Development' Causal relation: {Industrial_Revolution, Industrialism} → urbanises → {Industrial_City, Working_Class} Semantical explanation of industrial_Revolution_ID000001: The Industrial Revolution refers to the broad spectrum of profound social and economic transformations that surrounded the development of modern forms of industry, beginning in Great Britain in the late 18th century and spreading to other parts of the world throughout the 19th and 20th centuries. This period was marked by significant technological innovations, particularly the invention of new machines and the use of new energy sources like steam power, which led to the rise of factory-based production and a shift from agrarian-based economies to those dominated by manufacturing and industry. The Industrial Revolution had far-reaching consequences, leading to urbanisation, the growth of new social classes, changes in family structures, and significant alterations in people's daily lives and ways of working. It laid the foundation for modern industrial societies and continues to shape the world today through ongoing technological advancements and their social and economic impacts.
The industrial_Revolution_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Technological Social Innovation' Causal relation: {Innovation, Industrial_Revolution} → innovates → {Social_Change, Invention} Semantical explanation of industrial_Revolution_ID000002: The Industrial Revolution refers to the broad spectrum of profound social and economic transformations that surrounded the development of modern forms of industry, beginning in Great Britain in the late 18th century and spreading to other parts of the world throughout the 19th and 20th centuries. This period was marked by significant technological innovations, particularly the invention of new machines and the use of new energy sources like steam power, which led to the rise of factory-based production and a shift from agrarian-based economies to those dominated by manufacturing and industry. The Industrial Revolution had far-reaching consequences, leading to urbanisation, the growth of new social classes, changes in family structures, and significant alterations in people's daily lives and ways of working. It laid the foundation for modern industrial societies and continues to shape the world today through ongoing technological advancements and their social and economic impacts.
The industrial_Revolution_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Urban Development and Social Change' Causal relation: {Urbanisation, Industrial_Revolution} → urbanises → {Urban_Ecology, Metropolis} Semantical explanation of industrial_Revolution_ID000003: The Industrial Revolution refers to the broad spectrum of profound social and economic transformations that surrounded the development of modern forms of industry, beginning in Great Britain in the late 18th century and spreading to other parts of the world throughout the 19th and 20th centuries. This period was marked by significant technological innovations, particularly the invention of new machines and the use of new energy sources like steam power, which led to the rise of factory-based production and a shift from agrarian-based economies to those dominated by manufacturing and industry. The Industrial Revolution had far-reaching consequences, leading to urbanisation, the growth of new social classes, changes in family structures, and significant alterations in people's daily lives and ways of working. It laid the foundation for modern industrial societies and continues to shape the world today through ongoing technological advancements and their social and economic impacts.
The industrial_Society_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Industrialisation Urbanises Society' Causal relation: {Industrial_Society} → urbanises → {Urbanisation} Semantical explanation of industrial_Society_ID000001: An industrial society is a type of society that depends primarily on mechanisation, advanced technology, and sophisticated machinery powered by advanced energy sources to produce its economic goods and services on a large scale. This form of society emerged with the Industrial Revolution and is characterised by a complex division of labor, a high degree of urbanisation as people move to centers of production, and a reliance on manufacturing and industrial processes rather than agriculture as the main source of economic activity. Industrial societies typically have a more complex social structure with greater social mobility compared to pre-industrial societies, although they can also experience significant social inequalities related to the distribution of wealth and power in the industrial economy. The development of industrial societies has led to significant increases in productivity, material wealth, and standards of living in many parts of the world, but also to new social and environmental challenges.
The industrial_Society_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Rural-Urban Population Movement' Causal relation: {Urbanisation, Industrial_Society} → migrates → {Migration, Demographic_Transition} Semantical explanation of industrial_Society_ID000002: An industrial society is a type of society that depends primarily on mechanisation, advanced technology, and sophisticated machinery powered by advanced energy sources to produce its economic goods and services on a large scale. This form of society emerged with the Industrial Revolution and is characterised by a complex division of labor, a high degree of urbanisation as people move to centers of production, and a reliance on manufacturing and industrial processes rather than agriculture as the main source of economic activity. Industrial societies typically have a more complex social structure with greater social mobility compared to pre-industrial societies, although they can also experience significant social inequalities related to the distribution of wealth and power in the industrial economy. The development of industrial societies has led to significant increases in productivity, material wealth, and standards of living in many parts of the world, but also to new social and environmental challenges.
The industrial_Society_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Urbanisation and Social Transformation' Causal relation: {Urbanisation, Industrial_Society} → urbanises → {Urbanism, Social_Structure} Semantical explanation of industrial_Society_ID000003: An industrial society is a type of society that depends primarily on mechanisation, advanced technology, and sophisticated machinery powered by advanced energy sources to produce its economic goods and services on a large scale. This form of society emerged with the Industrial Revolution and is characterised by a complex division of labor, a high degree of urbanisation as people move to centers of production, and a reliance on manufacturing and industrial processes rather than agriculture as the main source of economic activity. Industrial societies typically have a more complex social structure with greater social mobility compared to pre-industrial societies, although they can also experience significant social inequalities related to the distribution of wealth and power in the industrial economy. The development of industrial societies has led to significant increases in productivity, material wealth, and standards of living in many parts of the world, but also to new social and environmental challenges.
The industrialism_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Capitalist Production and Class Formation' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Mass_Production, Industrialism} → stratifies → {Working_Class, Bourgeoisie, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of industrialism_ID000001: Industrialism refers to a social and economic system characterised by the extensive use of technology, particularly sophisticated machinery powered by advanced sources of energy such as fossil fuels and electricity, to produce goods and services on a large scale. It is the driving force behind industrial societies, leading to mass production, specialisation of labor, and the growth of factories and urban centers. Industrialism has transformed the way people live and work, leading to unprecedented levels of material wealth and technological progress in many parts of the world. However, it has also brought about social changes, such as the rise of new social classes and new forms of social inequality, as well as environmental challenges related to resource consumption and pollution. The study of industrialism examines its historical development, its social and economic consequences, and its ongoing evolution in the face of new technological innovations and global challenges.
The industrialism_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Industrial Revolution and Urban Development' Causal relation: {Industrial_Revolution, Industrialism} → urbanises → {Industrial_City, Working_Class} Semantical explanation of industrialism_ID000002: Industrialism refers to a social and economic system characterised by the extensive use of technology, particularly sophisticated machinery powered by advanced sources of energy such as fossil fuels and electricity, to produce goods and services on a large scale. It is the driving force behind industrial societies, leading to mass production, specialisation of labor, and the growth of factories and urban centers. Industrialism has transformed the way people live and work, leading to unprecedented levels of material wealth and technological progress in many parts of the world. However, it has also brought about social changes, such as the rise of new social classes and new forms of social inequality, as well as environmental challenges related to resource consumption and pollution. The study of industrialism examines its historical development, its social and economic consequences, and its ongoing evolution in the face of new technological innovations and global challenges.
The industrialism_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Industrial Urban Development' Causal relation: {Industrial_City, Industrialism} → urbanises → {Urban_Ecology, Postindustrial_City} Semantical explanation of industrialism_ID000003: Industrialism refers to a social and economic system characterised by the extensive use of technology, particularly sophisticated machinery powered by advanced sources of energy such as fossil fuels and electricity, to produce goods and services on a large scale. It is the driving force behind industrial societies, leading to mass production, specialisation of labor, and the growth of factories and urban centers. Industrialism has transformed the way people live and work, leading to unprecedented levels of material wealth and technological progress in many parts of the world. However, it has also brought about social changes, such as the rise of new social classes and new forms of social inequality, as well as environmental challenges related to resource consumption and pollution. The study of industrialism examines its historical development, its social and economic consequences, and its ongoing evolution in the face of new technological innovations and global challenges.
The influence_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Influence Affects Behaviour' Causal relation: {Influence} → hasInfluence → {Social_Cohesion} Semantical explanation of influence_ID000001: Influence refers to the exercise of power through a process of persuasion, where one individual or group is able to affect the thoughts, feelings, or behaviours of others without resorting to explicit force or coercion. It relies on the ability to convince or convince others to adopt a particular viewpoint, take a specific action, or support a certain cause through communication, reasoning, and the appeal to shared values or interests. Influence can operate through various channels, including personal relationships, social networks, media, and public discourse. It is a key aspect of social interaction and plays a significant role in shaping social norms, group dynamics, and political processes. Informal norms, which are generally understood rules of behaviour within a group or society but are not precisely recorded or formally enforced, often exert influence on individuals' actions through social expectations and the potential for social approval or disapproval.
The informal_Social_Control_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Control and Deviance Prevention' Causal relation: {Social_Control, Formal_Social_Control} → controls → {Deviance, Informal_Social_Control} Semantical explanation of informal_Social_Control_ID000001: Informal social control refers to the ways in which people casually enforce social norms and expectations through everyday interactions and social sanctions, such as laughter, smiles, ridicule, gossip, and expressions of approval or disapproval. This type of social control operates through interpersonal relationships and social pressure within families, peer groups, communities, and other informal social settings. It relies on the desire for social acceptance and the fear of social ostracism to encourage conformity to social norms. While informal social control may not involve formal punishments like legal sanctions, it can be very effective in shaping individual behaviour and maintaining social order at the micro-level of social interaction. The specific forms and effectiveness of informal social control can vary across different cultures and social groups.
The innovation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Automation and Labor Displacement' Causal relation: {Innovation, Internet} → automates → {Economy, Working_Class} Semantical explanation of innovation_ID000001: Innovation is the process of introducing new elements, ideas, methods, or products into a culture or society, leading to change and often improvement. This can occur through two primary mechanisms: discovery and invention. Discovery involves becoming aware of something that already exists but was previously unknown or unrecognised, such as a new scientific fact or a previously unknown natural resource. Invention, on the other hand, involves creating something entirely new that did not exist before, such as a new technology, a new tool, or a new process. Both discovery and invention can have profound impacts on a culture, leading to new practices, beliefs, social structures, and material advancements. The rate and nature of innovation can vary significantly across different societies and historical periods, influenced by factors such as technological development, cultural values, and social organisation.
The innovation_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Diffusion and Social Innovation' Causal relation: {Diffusion, Cultural_Capital} → hasInfluence → {Innovation, Social_Change} Semantical explanation of innovation_ID000002: Innovation is the process of introducing new elements, ideas, methods, or products into a culture or society, leading to change and often improvement. This can occur through two primary mechanisms: discovery and invention. Discovery involves becoming aware of something that already exists but was previously unknown or unrecognised, such as a new scientific fact or a previously unknown natural resource. Invention, on the other hand, involves creating something entirely new that did not exist before, such as a new technology, a new tool, or a new process. Both discovery and invention can have profound impacts on a culture, leading to new practices, beliefs, social structures, and material advancements. The rate and nature of innovation can vary significantly across different societies and historical periods, influenced by factors such as technological development, cultural values, and social organisation.
The innovation_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Diffusion Influences Innovation' Causal relation: {Diffusion} → hasInfluence → {Innovation} Semantical explanation of innovation_ID000003: Innovation is the process of introducing new elements, ideas, methods, or products into a culture or society, leading to change and often improvement. This can occur through two primary mechanisms: discovery and invention. Discovery involves becoming aware of something that already exists but was previously unknown or unrecognised, such as a new scientific fact or a previously unknown natural resource. Invention, on the other hand, involves creating something entirely new that did not exist before, such as a new technology, a new tool, or a new process. Both discovery and invention can have profound impacts on a culture, leading to new practices, beliefs, social structures, and material advancements. The rate and nature of innovation can vary significantly across different societies and historical periods, influenced by factors such as technological development, cultural values, and social organisation.
The innovation_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Environmental Technology and Development' Causal relation: {Innovation, Sustainable_Development} → influencesHistorically → {Economic_System, Social_Change} Semantical explanation of innovation_ID000004: Innovation is the process of introducing new elements, ideas, methods, or products into a culture or society, leading to change and often improvement. This can occur through two primary mechanisms: discovery and invention. Discovery involves becoming aware of something that already exists but was previously unknown or unrecognised, such as a new scientific fact or a previously unknown natural resource. Invention, on the other hand, involves creating something entirely new that did not exist before, such as a new technology, a new tool, or a new process. Both discovery and invention can have profound impacts on a culture, leading to new practices, beliefs, social structures, and material advancements. The rate and nature of innovation can vary significantly across different societies and historical periods, influenced by factors such as technological development, cultural values, and social organisation.
The innovation_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Innovation Automates Economy' Causal relation: {Innovation} → automates → {Economy} Semantical explanation of innovation_ID000005: Innovation is the process of introducing new elements, ideas, methods, or products into a culture or society, leading to change and often improvement. This can occur through two primary mechanisms: discovery and invention. Discovery involves becoming aware of something that already exists but was previously unknown or unrecognised, such as a new scientific fact or a previously unknown natural resource. Invention, on the other hand, involves creating something entirely new that did not exist before, such as a new technology, a new tool, or a new process. Both discovery and invention can have profound impacts on a culture, leading to new practices, beliefs, social structures, and material advancements. The rate and nature of innovation can vary significantly across different societies and historical periods, influenced by factors such as technological development, cultural values, and social organisation.
The innovation_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Science Innovates Technology' Causal relation: {Science} → innovates → {Innovation} Semantical explanation of innovation_ID000006: Innovation is the process of introducing new elements, ideas, methods, or products into a culture or society, leading to change and often improvement. This can occur through two primary mechanisms: discovery and invention. Discovery involves becoming aware of something that already exists but was previously unknown or unrecognised, such as a new scientific fact or a previously unknown natural resource. Invention, on the other hand, involves creating something entirely new that did not exist before, such as a new technology, a new tool, or a new process. Both discovery and invention can have profound impacts on a culture, leading to new practices, beliefs, social structures, and material advancements. The rate and nature of innovation can vary significantly across different societies and historical periods, influenced by factors such as technological development, cultural values, and social organisation.
The innovation_ID000007 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Technological Change and Work Transformation' Causal relation: {Innovation, Internet} → influencesHistorically → {Economy, Economic_And_Industrial_Transformation_Process} Semantical explanation of innovation_ID000007: Innovation is the process of introducing new elements, ideas, methods, or products into a culture or society, leading to change and often improvement. This can occur through two primary mechanisms: discovery and invention. Discovery involves becoming aware of something that already exists but was previously unknown or unrecognised, such as a new scientific fact or a previously unknown natural resource. Invention, on the other hand, involves creating something entirely new that did not exist before, such as a new technology, a new tool, or a new process. Both discovery and invention can have profound impacts on a culture, leading to new practices, beliefs, social structures, and material advancements. The rate and nature of innovation can vary significantly across different societies and historical periods, influenced by factors such as technological development, cultural values, and social organisation.
The innovation_ID000008 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Technological Influence and Social Adaptation' Causal relation: {Innovation, Cultural_Pluralism} → hasInfluence → {Social_Change, Modernisation} Semantical explanation of innovation_ID000008: Innovation is the process of introducing new elements, ideas, methods, or products into a culture or society, leading to change and often improvement. This can occur through two primary mechanisms: discovery and invention. Discovery involves becoming aware of something that already exists but was previously unknown or unrecognised, such as a new scientific fact or a previously unknown natural resource. Invention, on the other hand, involves creating something entirely new that did not exist before, such as a new technology, a new tool, or a new process. Both discovery and invention can have profound impacts on a culture, leading to new practices, beliefs, social structures, and material advancements. The rate and nature of innovation can vary significantly across different societies and historical periods, influenced by factors such as technological development, cultural values, and social organisation.
The innovation_ID000009 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Technological Innovation and Social Change' Causal relation: {Innovation, Science} → innovates → {Social_Change, Modernisation} Semantical explanation of innovation_ID000009: Innovation is the process of introducing new elements, ideas, methods, or products into a culture or society, leading to change and often improvement. This can occur through two primary mechanisms: discovery and invention. Discovery involves becoming aware of something that already exists but was previously unknown or unrecognised, such as a new scientific fact or a previously unknown natural resource. Invention, on the other hand, involves creating something entirely new that did not exist before, such as a new technology, a new tool, or a new process. Both discovery and invention can have profound impacts on a culture, leading to new practices, beliefs, social structures, and material advancements. The rate and nature of innovation can vary significantly across different societies and historical periods, influenced by factors such as technological development, cultural values, and social organisation.
The innovation_ID000010 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Technological Social Innovation' Causal relation: {Innovation, Industrial_Revolution} → innovates → {Social_Change, Invention} Semantical explanation of innovation_ID000010: Innovation is the process of introducing new elements, ideas, methods, or products into a culture or society, leading to change and often improvement. This can occur through two primary mechanisms: discovery and invention. Discovery involves becoming aware of something that already exists but was previously unknown or unrecognised, such as a new scientific fact or a previously unknown natural resource. Invention, on the other hand, involves creating something entirely new that did not exist before, such as a new technology, a new tool, or a new process. Both discovery and invention can have profound impacts on a culture, leading to new practices, beliefs, social structures, and material advancements. The rate and nature of innovation can vary significantly across different societies and historical periods, influenced by factors such as technological development, cultural values, and social organisation.
The innovation_ID000011 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Technology and Social Change' Causal relation: {Innovation, Healthcare} → influencesHistorically → {Social_Change, Holistic_Medicine} Semantical explanation of innovation_ID000011: Innovation is the process of introducing new elements, ideas, methods, or products into a culture or society, leading to change and often improvement. This can occur through two primary mechanisms: discovery and invention. Discovery involves becoming aware of something that already exists but was previously unknown or unrecognised, such as a new scientific fact or a previously unknown natural resource. Invention, on the other hand, involves creating something entirely new that did not exist before, such as a new technology, a new tool, or a new process. Both discovery and invention can have profound impacts on a culture, leading to new practices, beliefs, social structures, and material advancements. The rate and nature of innovation can vary significantly across different societies and historical periods, influenced by factors such as technological development, cultural values, and social organisation.
The institutional_Discrimination_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Discrimination Processes and Social Marginalisation' Causal relation: {Discrimination, Segregation, Institutional_Discrimination} → marginalises → {Minority_Group} Semantical explanation of institutional_Discrimination_ID000001: Institutional discrimination refers to the denial of opportunities and equal rights to individuals and groups that results from the normal operations of a society's institutions, such as schools, workplaces, healthcare systems, and the legal system, rather than from overt acts of individual prejudice. This form of discrimination is often embedded in established policies, procedures, and practices that may appear neutral on the surface but systematically disadvantage certain groups based on characteristics like race, ethnicity, gender, age, or socioeconomic status. For example, standardised testing in education that is culturally biased may disproportionately disadvantage students from certain minority groups, limiting their access to higher education. Similarly, hiring practices that rely heavily on personal networks may exclude qualified candidates who lack connections to the dominant group within an industry. Institutional discrimination can be subtle and often unintentional, but its cumulative effect can be significant in perpetuating social inequalities.
The institutional_Discrimination_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Discrimination Practices' Causal relation: {Institutional_Discrimination, Racism} → discriminatesAgainst → {Ethnic_Group, Racial_Group} Semantical explanation of institutional_Discrimination_ID000002: Institutional discrimination refers to the denial of opportunities and equal rights to individuals and groups that results from the normal operations of a society's institutions, such as schools, workplaces, healthcare systems, and the legal system, rather than from overt acts of individual prejudice. This form of discrimination is often embedded in established policies, procedures, and practices that may appear neutral on the surface but systematically disadvantage certain groups based on characteristics like race, ethnicity, gender, age, or socioeconomic status. For example, standardised testing in education that is culturally biased may disproportionately disadvantage students from certain minority groups, limiting their access to higher education. Similarly, hiring practices that rely heavily on personal networks may exclude qualified candidates who lack connections to the dominant group within an industry. Institutional discrimination can be subtle and often unintentional, but its cumulative effect can be significant in perpetuating social inequalities.
The institutional_Discrimination_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Racial Spatial Segregation' Causal relation: {Apartheid, Institutional_Discrimination} → segregates → {Segregation, Defended_Neighborhood} Semantical explanation of institutional_Discrimination_ID000003: Institutional discrimination refers to the denial of opportunities and equal rights to individuals and groups that results from the normal operations of a society's institutions, such as schools, workplaces, healthcare systems, and the legal system, rather than from overt acts of individual prejudice. This form of discrimination is often embedded in established policies, procedures, and practices that may appear neutral on the surface but systematically disadvantage certain groups based on characteristics like race, ethnicity, gender, age, or socioeconomic status. For example, standardised testing in education that is culturally biased may disproportionately disadvantage students from certain minority groups, limiting their access to higher education. Similarly, hiring practices that rely heavily on personal networks may exclude qualified candidates who lack connections to the dominant group within an industry. Institutional discrimination can be subtle and often unintentional, but its cumulative effect can be significant in perpetuating social inequalities.
The interest_Group_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Interest Group Mobilises Support' Causal relation: {Interest_Group} → mobilises → {Politics} Semantical explanation of interest_Group_ID000001: An interest group is a voluntary association of citizens who come together with the shared goal of attempting to influence public policy in their favour. These groups advocate for specific issues or the interests of their members by lobbying government officials, raising public awareness, and mobilizing support for their cause. Interest groups can represent a wide range of concerns, including economic interests (e.g., business associations, labor unions), social issues (e.g., environmental groups, civil rights organisations), and professional interests (e.g., medical associations, bar associations). They play a significant role in the political process by providing information to policymakers, contributing to political campaigns, and putting pressure on elected officials to support their agendas. The activities of interest groups are a key aspect of understanding how public policy is shaped and the various influences at play in democratic societies.
The interest_Group_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Interest Group Political Advocacy' Causal relation: {Interest_Group, Political_Action_Committee_(PAC)} → advocates → {Political_System, Democracy} Semantical explanation of interest_Group_ID000002: An interest group is a voluntary association of citizens who come together with the shared goal of attempting to influence public policy in their favour. These groups advocate for specific issues or the interests of their members by lobbying government officials, raising public awareness, and mobilizing support for their cause. Interest groups can represent a wide range of concerns, including economic interests (e.g., business associations, labor unions), social issues (e.g., environmental groups, civil rights organisations), and professional interests (e.g., medical associations, bar associations). They play a significant role in the political process by providing information to policymakers, contributing to political campaigns, and putting pressure on elected officials to support their agendas. The activities of interest groups are a key aspect of understanding how public policy is shaped and the various influences at play in democratic societies.
The interest_Group_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Organisational Collaborative Relations' Causal relation: {Coalition, Interest_Group} → collaboratesWith → {Resource_Mobilisation, Quality_Circle} Semantical explanation of interest_Group_ID000003: An interest group is a voluntary association of citizens who come together with the shared goal of attempting to influence public policy in their favour. These groups advocate for specific issues or the interests of their members by lobbying government officials, raising public awareness, and mobilizing support for their cause. Interest groups can represent a wide range of concerns, including economic interests (e.g., business associations, labor unions), social issues (e.g., environmental groups, civil rights organisations), and professional interests (e.g., medical associations, bar associations). They play a significant role in the political process by providing information to policymakers, contributing to political campaigns, and putting pressure on elected officials to support their agendas. The activities of interest groups are a key aspect of understanding how public policy is shaped and the various influences at play in democratic societies.
The interest_Group_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Political Mobilisation and Democratic Participation' Causal relation: {Interest_Group, Political_System} → mobilises → {Democracy, Politics} Semantical explanation of interest_Group_ID000004: An interest group is a voluntary association of citizens who come together with the shared goal of attempting to influence public policy in their favour. These groups advocate for specific issues or the interests of their members by lobbying government officials, raising public awareness, and mobilizing support for their cause. Interest groups can represent a wide range of concerns, including economic interests (e.g., business associations, labor unions), social issues (e.g., environmental groups, civil rights organisations), and professional interests (e.g., medical associations, bar associations). They play a significant role in the political process by providing information to policymakers, contributing to political campaigns, and putting pressure on elected officials to support their agendas. The activities of interest groups are a key aspect of understanding how public policy is shaped and the various influences at play in democratic societies.
The interest_Group_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Political Resource Mobilisation' Causal relation: {Political_Action_Committee_(PAC), Interest_Group} → mobilises → {Resource_Mobilisation, Politics} Semantical explanation of interest_Group_ID000005: An interest group is a voluntary association of citizens who come together with the shared goal of attempting to influence public policy in their favour. These groups advocate for specific issues or the interests of their members by lobbying government officials, raising public awareness, and mobilizing support for their cause. Interest groups can represent a wide range of concerns, including economic interests (e.g., business associations, labor unions), social issues (e.g., environmental groups, civil rights organisations), and professional interests (e.g., medical associations, bar associations). They play a significant role in the political process by providing information to policymakers, contributing to political campaigns, and putting pressure on elected officials to support their agendas. The activities of interest groups are a key aspect of understanding how public policy is shaped and the various influences at play in democratic societies.
The internet_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Automation and Labor Displacement' Causal relation: {Innovation, Internet} → automates → {Economy, Working_Class} Semantical explanation of internet_ID000001: The Internet is a global system of interconnected computer networks that allows people to communicate with one another and find information on the Worldwide Web by exchanging data in various forms, including visuals, sounds, and text. This vast network operates in a way that largely transcends the limitations of time, physical space, and the traditional costs and control mechanisms associated with distance and territorial governments. The Internet has become an indispensable tool for communication, education, commerce, entertainment, and social interaction, connecting billions of people around the world and providing access to an unprecedented amount of information and resources. Its decentralised nature and open architecture have fostered innovation and the rapid development of new technologies and applications, transforming many aspects of modern life and contributing to the phenomenon of globalisation.
The internet_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Digital Communication and Social Transformation' Causal relation: {Internet, Cyberspace} → digitalises → {Social_Interaction, Social_Cohesion} Semantical explanation of internet_ID000002: The Internet is a global system of interconnected computer networks that allows people to communicate with one another and find information on the Worldwide Web by exchanging data in various forms, including visuals, sounds, and text. This vast network operates in a way that largely transcends the limitations of time, physical space, and the traditional costs and control mechanisms associated with distance and territorial governments. The Internet has become an indispensable tool for communication, education, commerce, entertainment, and social interaction, connecting billions of people around the world and providing access to an unprecedented amount of information and resources. Its decentralised nature and open architecture have fostered innovation and the rapid development of new technologies and applications, transforming many aspects of modern life and contributing to the phenomenon of globalisation.
The internet_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Digital Divide and Information Inequality' Causal relation: {Internet, Relative_Poverty} → stratifies → {Social_Inequality, Education} Semantical explanation of internet_ID000003: The Internet is a global system of interconnected computer networks that allows people to communicate with one another and find information on the Worldwide Web by exchanging data in various forms, including visuals, sounds, and text. This vast network operates in a way that largely transcends the limitations of time, physical space, and the traditional costs and control mechanisms associated with distance and territorial governments. The Internet has become an indispensable tool for communication, education, commerce, entertainment, and social interaction, connecting billions of people around the world and providing access to an unprecedented amount of information and resources. Its decentralised nature and open architecture have fostered innovation and the rapid development of new technologies and applications, transforming many aspects of modern life and contributing to the phenomenon of globalisation.
The internet_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Digital Technology Social Transformation' Causal relation: {Internet, E-commerce} → digitalises → {Social_Change, Cyberspace} Semantical explanation of internet_ID000004: The Internet is a global system of interconnected computer networks that allows people to communicate with one another and find information on the Worldwide Web by exchanging data in various forms, including visuals, sounds, and text. This vast network operates in a way that largely transcends the limitations of time, physical space, and the traditional costs and control mechanisms associated with distance and territorial governments. The Internet has become an indispensable tool for communication, education, commerce, entertainment, and social interaction, connecting billions of people around the world and providing access to an unprecedented amount of information and resources. Its decentralised nature and open architecture have fostered innovation and the rapid development of new technologies and applications, transforming many aspects of modern life and contributing to the phenomenon of globalisation.
The internet_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Global Influence and Cultural Exchange' Causal relation: {Global_Village, Internet} → hasInfluence → {Culture, Social_Change, Social_Role} Semantical explanation of internet_ID000005: The Internet is a global system of interconnected computer networks that allows people to communicate with one another and find information on the Worldwide Web by exchanging data in various forms, including visuals, sounds, and text. This vast network operates in a way that largely transcends the limitations of time, physical space, and the traditional costs and control mechanisms associated with distance and territorial governments. The Internet has become an indispensable tool for communication, education, commerce, entertainment, and social interaction, connecting billions of people around the world and providing access to an unprecedented amount of information and resources. Its decentralised nature and open architecture have fostered innovation and the rapid development of new technologies and applications, transforming many aspects of modern life and contributing to the phenomenon of globalisation.
The internet_ID000006 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Internet Influences Communication' Causal relation: {Internet} → hasInfluence → {Organised_Crime} Semantical explanation of internet_ID000006: The Internet is a global system of interconnected computer networks that allows people to communicate with one another and find information on the Worldwide Web by exchanging data in various forms, including visuals, sounds, and text. This vast network operates in a way that largely transcends the limitations of time, physical space, and the traditional costs and control mechanisms associated with distance and territorial governments. The Internet has become an indispensable tool for communication, education, commerce, entertainment, and social interaction, connecting billions of people around the world and providing access to an unprecedented amount of information and resources. Its decentralised nature and open architecture have fostered innovation and the rapid development of new technologies and applications, transforming many aspects of modern life and contributing to the phenomenon of globalisation.
The internet_ID000007 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media Influence on Social Consciousness' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Internet} → hasInfluence → {Social_Consciousness_And_Theoretical_Quality, Public_Sphere} Semantical explanation of internet_ID000007: The Internet is a global system of interconnected computer networks that allows people to communicate with one another and find information on the Worldwide Web by exchanging data in various forms, including visuals, sounds, and text. This vast network operates in a way that largely transcends the limitations of time, physical space, and the traditional costs and control mechanisms associated with distance and territorial governments. The Internet has become an indispensable tool for communication, education, commerce, entertainment, and social interaction, connecting billions of people around the world and providing access to an unprecedented amount of information and resources. Its decentralised nature and open architecture have fostered innovation and the rapid development of new technologies and applications, transforming many aspects of modern life and contributing to the phenomenon of globalisation.
The internet_ID000008 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Network Formation' Causal relation: {Social_Network, Internet} → networks → {Social_Interaction, Peer_Group} Semantical explanation of internet_ID000008: The Internet is a global system of interconnected computer networks that allows people to communicate with one another and find information on the Worldwide Web by exchanging data in various forms, including visuals, sounds, and text. This vast network operates in a way that largely transcends the limitations of time, physical space, and the traditional costs and control mechanisms associated with distance and territorial governments. The Internet has become an indispensable tool for communication, education, commerce, entertainment, and social interaction, connecting billions of people around the world and providing access to an unprecedented amount of information and resources. Its decentralised nature and open architecture have fostered innovation and the rapid development of new technologies and applications, transforming many aspects of modern life and contributing to the phenomenon of globalisation.
The internet_ID000009 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Technological Change and Work Transformation' Causal relation: {Innovation, Internet} → influencesHistorically → {Economy, Economic_And_Industrial_Transformation_Process} Semantical explanation of internet_ID000009: The Internet is a global system of interconnected computer networks that allows people to communicate with one another and find information on the Worldwide Web by exchanging data in various forms, including visuals, sounds, and text. This vast network operates in a way that largely transcends the limitations of time, physical space, and the traditional costs and control mechanisms associated with distance and territorial governments. The Internet has become an indispensable tool for communication, education, commerce, entertainment, and social interaction, connecting billions of people around the world and providing access to an unprecedented amount of information and resources. Its decentralised nature and open architecture have fostered innovation and the rapid development of new technologies and applications, transforming many aspects of modern life and contributing to the phenomenon of globalisation.
The interview_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Biographical Research Methods' Causal relation: {Biographical_Research, Life_History} → interviews → {Interview, Oral_History} Semantical explanation of interview_ID000001: In sociological research, an interview is a method of data collection that involves a series of questions a researcher administers personally to respondents, either face-to-face, by telephone, or through video conferencing. Interviews can be structured, following a predetermined set of questions in a specific order, or unstructured, allowing for more open-ended conversation and exploration of topics. Semi-structured interviews combine elements of both approaches, using an interview guide with key questions but allowing for flexibility in probing responses and exploring related issues that may arise. Interviews are a valuable tool for gathering in-depth qualitative data about individuals' experiences, perspectives, attitudes, and beliefs, providing rich insights into social phenomena that may not be captured by quantitative methods like surveys. The success of an interview depends on the researcher's ability to establish rapport with the respondent, ask clear and unbiased questions, and actively listen to and record their responses accurately.
The interview_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Qualitative Research Interviewing' Causal relation: {Interview, Biographical_Method} → interviews → {Qualitative_Research, Life_History} Semantical explanation of interview_ID000002: In sociological research, an interview is a method of data collection that involves a series of questions a researcher administers personally to respondents, either face-to-face, by telephone, or through video conferencing. Interviews can be structured, following a predetermined set of questions in a specific order, or unstructured, allowing for more open-ended conversation and exploration of topics. Semi-structured interviews combine elements of both approaches, using an interview guide with key questions but allowing for flexibility in probing responses and exploring related issues that may arise. Interviews are a valuable tool for gathering in-depth qualitative data about individuals' experiences, perspectives, attitudes, and beliefs, providing rich insights into social phenomena that may not be captured by quantitative methods like surveys. The success of an interview depends on the researcher's ability to establish rapport with the respondent, ask clear and unbiased questions, and actively listen to and record their responses accurately.
The invention_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Organisational Management Control' Causal relation: {Bureaucracy, Formal_Organisation} → manages → {Organisation, Invention} Semantical explanation of invention_ID000001: Invention is the process of combining existing cultural items, ideas, or technologies into a new form that did not previously exist. It involves creativity and innovation to produce something novel, whether it is a tangible object, a new method, or a new concept. Inventions can range from simple tools to complex technological systems and can have significant impacts on society and culture, leading to social change and the development of new ways of life. Invention is one of the primary drivers of cultural innovation, alongside discovery, which involves becoming aware of something that already exists but was previously unknown. The spread and adoption of inventions within a culture or across societies is a process known as diffusion.
The invention_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Technological Social Innovation' Causal relation: {Innovation, Industrial_Revolution} → innovates → {Social_Change, Invention} Semantical explanation of invention_ID000002: Invention is the process of combining existing cultural items, ideas, or technologies into a new form that did not previously exist. It involves creativity and innovation to produce something novel, whether it is a tangible object, a new method, or a new concept. Inventions can range from simple tools to complex technological systems and can have significant impacts on society and culture, leading to social change and the development of new ways of life. Invention is one of the primary drivers of cultural innovation, alongside discovery, which involves becoming aware of something that already exists but was previously unknown. The spread and adoption of inventions within a culture or across societies is a process known as diffusion.
The job_Insecurity_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Post-Fordist Production and Employment Flexibility' Causal relation: {Post-Fordism, Flexible_Production} → influencesHistorically → {Job_Insecurity, Outsourcing} Semantical explanation of job_Insecurity_ID000001: Job insecurity refers to a sense of apprehension, worry, or anxiety experienced by employees about both the stability of their current work position and their future role within the workplace or the broader labor market. This feeling can arise from various factors, such as economic downturns, company restructuring, technological changes leading to automation, globalisation and outsourcing of jobs, or changes in employment contracts and labor laws that reduce job security. High levels of job insecurity can have negative consequences for employees' mental and physical health, job satisfaction, productivity, and overall well-being, as well as impacting their families and communities. It can also affect organisational outcomes, leading to decreased employee loyalty and motivation.
The kinship_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Family Formation Processes' Causal relation: {Nuclear_Family, Extended_Family} → adopts → {Adoption, Kinship} Semantical explanation of kinship_ID000001: Kinship refers to a social relation that links individuals through blood ties (consanguinity), marriage (affinity), or adoption, forming the basis of family and social organisation in many societies. These relationships define social roles, obligations, and expectations among individuals and groups, influencing patterns of inheritance, residence, and social support. Different cultures have diverse kinship systems that determine how family relationships are recognised and structured, including variations in descent patterns (e.g., patrilineal, matrilineal, bilateral) and the importance placed on different types of relatives. Kinship systems play a fundamental role in shaping social organisation, cultural practices, and individual identities in societies around the world.
The labeling_Theory_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Labeling and Deviant Identity Formation' Causal relation: {Labeling_Theory, Stigma} → stigmatises → {Deviance, Social_Exclusion} Semantical explanation of labeling_Theory_ID000001: Labeling theory is a sociological approach to understanding deviance that attempts to explain why certain people are viewed and treated as deviants while others engaging in the same behaviour are not. This theory emphasises the role of social reaction and the application of labels in the creation of deviance. It suggests that deviance is not inherent in an act itself but rather is a social construct defined by how society responds to certain behaviours and individuals. When individuals are labeled as deviant by political authorities or other influential groups, this label can become a self-fulfilling prophecy, leading to further deviant behaviour as the labeled individuals internalise the label and are treated accordingly by others. Labeling theory highlights the power of social definitions and the consequences of being labeled as deviant for an individual's identity and life chances.
The labeling_Theory_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Stigmatisation and Identity Management' Causal relation: {Stigma, Labeling_Theory} → stigmatises → {Identity, Social_Exclusion} Semantical explanation of labeling_Theory_ID000002: Labeling theory is a sociological approach to understanding deviance that attempts to explain why certain people are viewed and treated as deviants while others engaging in the same behaviour are not. This theory emphasises the role of social reaction and the application of labels in the creation of deviance. It suggests that deviance is not inherent in an act itself but rather is a social construct defined by how society responds to certain behaviours and individuals. When individuals are labeled as deviant by political authorities or other influential groups, this label can become a self-fulfilling prophecy, leading to further deviant behaviour as the labeled individuals internalise the label and are treated accordingly by others. Labeling theory highlights the power of social definitions and the consequences of being labeled as deviant for an individual's identity and life chances.
The labeling_Theory_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Stigmatisation Processes' Causal relation: {Labeling_Theory, Social_Constructionist_Perspective} → stigmatises → {Stigma, Deviance} Semantical explanation of labeling_Theory_ID000003: Labeling theory is a sociological approach to understanding deviance that attempts to explain why certain people are viewed and treated as deviants while others engaging in the same behaviour are not. This theory emphasises the role of social reaction and the application of labels in the creation of deviance. It suggests that deviance is not inherent in an act itself but rather is a social construct defined by how society responds to certain behaviours and individuals. When individuals are labeled as deviant by political authorities or other influential groups, this label can become a self-fulfilling prophecy, leading to further deviant behaviour as the labeled individuals internalise the label and are treated accordingly by others. Labeling theory highlights the power of social definitions and the consequences of being labeled as deviant for an individual's identity and life chances.
The labour_Union_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Collective Political Resistance' Causal relation: {Social_Movement, Labour_Union} → protests → {Politics, Social_Change} Semantical explanation of labour_Union_ID000001: Labour unions are formal organisations of workers who come together to collectively seek to improve their wages, working conditions, benefits, and job security through various strategies, including negotiation with employers (collective bargaining) and the use of tactics such as strikes when necessary. Unions provide a collective voice for workers, aiming to balance the power dynamic between individual employees and employers. They advocate for workers' rights, fair treatment, and safer workplaces. The history and influence of labour unions have played a significant role in shaping labor laws, workplace standards, and the overall distribution of economic power in many countries.
The labour_Union_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Labor Movement Resistance' Causal relation: {Labour_Union, Trade_Union} → protests → {Strike, Working_Class} Semantical explanation of labour_Union_ID000002: Labour unions are formal organisations of workers who come together to collectively seek to improve their wages, working conditions, benefits, and job security through various strategies, including negotiation with employers (collective bargaining) and the use of tactics such as strikes when necessary. Unions provide a collective voice for workers, aiming to balance the power dynamic between individual employees and employers. They advocate for workers' rights, fair treatment, and safer workplaces. The history and influence of labour unions have played a significant role in shaping labor laws, workplace standards, and the overall distribution of economic power in many countries.
The labour_Union_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Labor Organisation and Worker Protection' Causal relation: {Labour_Union, Trade_Union} → protests → {Capitalism, Bourgeoisie} Semantical explanation of labour_Union_ID000003: Labour unions are formal organisations of workers who come together to collectively seek to improve their wages, working conditions, benefits, and job security through various strategies, including negotiation with employers (collective bargaining) and the use of tactics such as strikes when necessary. Unions provide a collective voice for workers, aiming to balance the power dynamic between individual employees and employers. They advocate for workers' rights, fair treatment, and safer workplaces. The history and influence of labour unions have played a significant role in shaping labor laws, workplace standards, and the overall distribution of economic power in many countries.
The laissez-faire_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Market Economic Control' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Economy} → controls → {Economic_System, Laissez-faire} Semantical explanation of laissez-faire_ID000001: Laissez-faire is a specific form of capitalism under which individuals and businesses compete freely in the marketplace with minimal or no government intervention in the economy. This economic philosophy advocates for a separation of the state from economic affairs, believing that the natural forces of supply and demand, driven by self-interest and competition, will lead to the most efficient allocation of resources and the greatest overall prosperity. In a pure laissez-faire system, the role of government is typically limited to enforcing contracts, protecting private property rights, and maintaining peace and order, without imposing regulations, tariffs, subsidies, or other forms of economic control. The idea is that the "invisible hand" of the market will guide economic activity more effectively than state intervention. While no modern economy operates under a completely laissez-faire system, it remains an influential theoretical model in economic and political thought.
The language_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Intergenerational Cultural Transmission' Causal relation: {Cultural_Transmission, Language} → preserves → {Culture, Value} Semantical explanation of language_ID000001: Language is an abstract and complex system of word meanings, symbols, and rules (grammar) that are shared by members of a culture and used for communication and representing all aspects of that culture. It is not limited to spoken or written words but also includes gestures, facial expressions, and other forms of nonverbal communication that convey meaning within a social context. Language is fundamental to human interaction, social organisation, and the transmission of culture from one generation to the next. It shapes how we think, perceive the world, and construct our social reality. The diversity of human languages reflects the rich tapestry of human cultures and the different ways in which societies have developed to understand and interact with their environments.
The language_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Coordination and Collective Action' Causal relation: {Norm, Language} → coordinates → {Collective_Behaviour, Social_Structure} Semantical explanation of language_ID000002: Language is an abstract and complex system of word meanings, symbols, and rules (grammar) that are shared by members of a culture and used for communication and representing all aspects of that culture. It is not limited to spoken or written words but also includes gestures, facial expressions, and other forms of nonverbal communication that convey meaning within a social context. Language is fundamental to human interaction, social organisation, and the transmission of culture from one generation to the next. It shapes how we think, perceive the world, and construct our social reality. The diversity of human languages reflects the rich tapestry of human cultures and the different ways in which societies have developed to understand and interact with their environments.
The law_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Bureaucratic Authority and Institutional Organisation' Causal relation: {Bureaucratisation, Legal-rational_Authority} → institutionalises → {Formal_Organisation, Law} Semantical explanation of law_ID000001: Law refers to governmental social control, representing a formal system of rules and regulations enacted and enforced by political authorities to govern behaviour and maintain social order within a society. Laws are typically written down and specify both the behaviours that are prohibited or required and the sanctions or penalties that will be applied when violations occur. The legal system includes various institutions, such as legislatures that create laws, law enforcement agencies that enforce them, and courts that interpret laws and adjudicate disputes. Law plays a crucial role in establishing norms, resolving conflicts, protecting rights, and providing a framework for social interaction in complex societies. The legitimacy and effectiveness of law depend on its acceptance by the people it governs and its consistent and fair application.
The law_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Family Structure Regulation' Causal relation: {Law, State} → regulates → {Marriage, Family} Semantical explanation of law_ID000002: Law refers to governmental social control, representing a formal system of rules and regulations enacted and enforced by political authorities to govern behaviour and maintain social order within a society. Laws are typically written down and specify both the behaviours that are prohibited or required and the sanctions or penalties that will be applied when violations occur. The legal system includes various institutions, such as legislatures that create laws, law enforcement agencies that enforce them, and courts that interpret laws and adjudicate disputes. Law plays a crucial role in establishing norms, resolving conflicts, protecting rights, and providing a framework for social interaction in complex societies. The legitimacy and effectiveness of law depend on its acceptance by the people it governs and its consistent and fair application.
The law_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Control and Social Regulation' Causal relation: {Social_Institution, Law} → controls → {Social_Control, Formal_Social_Control} Semantical explanation of law_ID000003: Law refers to governmental social control, representing a formal system of rules and regulations enacted and enforced by political authorities to govern behaviour and maintain social order within a society. Laws are typically written down and specify both the behaviours that are prohibited or required and the sanctions or penalties that will be applied when violations occur. The legal system includes various institutions, such as legislatures that create laws, law enforcement agencies that enforce them, and courts that interpret laws and adjudicate disputes. Law plays a crucial role in establishing norms, resolving conflicts, protecting rights, and providing a framework for social interaction in complex societies. The legitimacy and effectiveness of law depend on its acceptance by the people it governs and its consistent and fair application.
The law_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Law Controls Behaviour' Causal relation: {Law} → hasInfluence → {Social_Control} Semantical explanation of law_ID000004: Law refers to governmental social control, representing a formal system of rules and regulations enacted and enforced by political authorities to govern behaviour and maintain social order within a society. Laws are typically written down and specify both the behaviours that are prohibited or required and the sanctions or penalties that will be applied when violations occur. The legal system includes various institutions, such as legislatures that create laws, law enforcement agencies that enforce them, and courts that interpret laws and adjudicate disputes. Law plays a crucial role in establishing norms, resolving conflicts, protecting rights, and providing a framework for social interaction in complex societies. The legitimacy and effectiveness of law depend on its acceptance by the people it governs and its consistent and fair application.
The law_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Legal Social Control Process' Causal relation: {Law, Formal_Social_Control} → regulates → {Crime, Deviance} Semantical explanation of law_ID000005: Law refers to governmental social control, representing a formal system of rules and regulations enacted and enforced by political authorities to govern behaviour and maintain social order within a society. Laws are typically written down and specify both the behaviours that are prohibited or required and the sanctions or penalties that will be applied when violations occur. The legal system includes various institutions, such as legislatures that create laws, law enforcement agencies that enforce them, and courts that interpret laws and adjudicate disputes. Law plays a crucial role in establishing norms, resolving conflicts, protecting rights, and providing a framework for social interaction in complex societies. The legitimacy and effectiveness of law depend on its acceptance by the people it governs and its consistent and fair application.
The law_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Political Authority and Social Control' Causal relation: {Government, Bureaucracy} → governs → {Social_Control, Law} Semantical explanation of law_ID000006: Law refers to governmental social control, representing a formal system of rules and regulations enacted and enforced by political authorities to govern behaviour and maintain social order within a society. Laws are typically written down and specify both the behaviours that are prohibited or required and the sanctions or penalties that will be applied when violations occur. The legal system includes various institutions, such as legislatures that create laws, law enforcement agencies that enforce them, and courts that interpret laws and adjudicate disputes. Law plays a crucial role in establishing norms, resolving conflicts, protecting rights, and providing a framework for social interaction in complex societies. The legitimacy and effectiveness of law depend on its acceptance by the people it governs and its consistent and fair application.
The law_ID000007 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Control and Crime Prevention' Causal relation: {Law, Social_Control} → controls → {Crime, Formal_Social_Control} Semantical explanation of law_ID000007: Law refers to governmental social control, representing a formal system of rules and regulations enacted and enforced by political authorities to govern behaviour and maintain social order within a society. Laws are typically written down and specify both the behaviours that are prohibited or required and the sanctions or penalties that will be applied when violations occur. The legal system includes various institutions, such as legislatures that create laws, law enforcement agencies that enforce them, and courts that interpret laws and adjudicate disputes. Law plays a crucial role in establishing norms, resolving conflicts, protecting rights, and providing a framework for social interaction in complex societies. The legitimacy and effectiveness of law depend on its acceptance by the people it governs and its consistent and fair application.
The law_ID000008 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Control and Normative Regulation' Causal relation: {Social_Control, Law} → regulates → {Deviance, Crime} Semantical explanation of law_ID000008: Law refers to governmental social control, representing a formal system of rules and regulations enacted and enforced by political authorities to govern behaviour and maintain social order within a society. Laws are typically written down and specify both the behaviours that are prohibited or required and the sanctions or penalties that will be applied when violations occur. The legal system includes various institutions, such as legislatures that create laws, law enforcement agencies that enforce them, and courts that interpret laws and adjudicate disputes. Law plays a crucial role in establishing norms, resolving conflicts, protecting rights, and providing a framework for social interaction in complex societies. The legitimacy and effectiveness of law depend on its acceptance by the people it governs and its consistent and fair application.
The law_ID000009 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'State Social Control Mechanisms' Causal relation: {State, Government} → regulates → {Social_Control, Law} Semantical explanation of law_ID000009: Law refers to governmental social control, representing a formal system of rules and regulations enacted and enforced by political authorities to govern behaviour and maintain social order within a society. Laws are typically written down and specify both the behaviours that are prohibited or required and the sanctions or penalties that will be applied when violations occur. The legal system includes various institutions, such as legislatures that create laws, law enforcement agencies that enforce them, and courts that interpret laws and adjudicate disputes. Law plays a crucial role in establishing norms, resolving conflicts, protecting rights, and providing a framework for social interaction in complex societies. The legitimacy and effectiveness of law depend on its acceptance by the people it governs and its consistent and fair application.
The legal-rational_Authority_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Authority Legitimation Processes' Causal relation: {Legal-rational_Authority, Traditional_Authority} → regulates → {Legitimacy, Power} Semantical explanation of legal-rational_Authority_ID000001: Legal-rational authority, as defined by Max Weber, is a type of power made legitimate by law, rules, and regulations that are rationally established and applied impartially. This form of authority is characteristic of modern bureaucratic organisations and states, where power is vested in positions or offices rather than in individuals based on tradition or personal charisma. Obedience is owed to the legally established rules and to those who hold positions of authority within that framework only when they are acting within the scope of those rules. Legal-rational authority emphasises competence, expertise, and adherence to formal procedures, contributing to efficiency and predictability in governance and organisational management. It is a cornerstone of modern democratic societies and bureaucratic structures.
The legal-rational_Authority_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Bureaucratic Authority and Institutional Organisation' Causal relation: {Bureaucratisation, Legal-rational_Authority} → institutionalises → {Formal_Organisation, Law} Semantical explanation of legal-rational_Authority_ID000002: Legal-rational authority, as defined by Max Weber, is a type of power made legitimate by law, rules, and regulations that are rationally established and applied impartially. This form of authority is characteristic of modern bureaucratic organisations and states, where power is vested in positions or offices rather than in individuals based on tradition or personal charisma. Obedience is owed to the legally established rules and to those who hold positions of authority within that framework only when they are acting within the scope of those rules. Legal-rational authority emphasises competence, expertise, and adherence to formal procedures, contributing to efficiency and predictability in governance and organisational management. It is a cornerstone of modern democratic societies and bureaucratic structures.
The legitimacy_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Authority and Social Legitimacy' Causal relation: {Authority, Legitimacy} → legitimises → {Power, Value} Semantical explanation of legitimacy_ID000001: Legitimacy in a political context refers to the widespread acceptance by the people governed that a particular political order, regime, or authority is just, right, and valid, and therefore deserving of their obedience and support. When a political system is seen as legitimate, people are more likely to comply with its laws and decisions voluntarily, leading to greater stability and social order. Legitimacy can be based on various factors, including tradition, charisma of leaders, and adherence to legal-rational principles and democratic processes. The perception of legitimacy is crucial for the effective exercise of power, as it reduces the need for coercion and fosters cooperation between the government and the governed.
The legitimacy_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Authority Legitimation Processes' Causal relation: {Legal-rational_Authority, Traditional_Authority} → regulates → {Legitimacy, Power} Semantical explanation of legitimacy_ID000002: Legitimacy in a political context refers to the widespread acceptance by the people governed that a particular political order, regime, or authority is just, right, and valid, and therefore deserving of their obedience and support. When a political system is seen as legitimate, people are more likely to comply with its laws and decisions voluntarily, leading to greater stability and social order. Legitimacy can be based on various factors, including tradition, charisma of leaders, and adherence to legal-rational principles and democratic processes. The perception of legitimacy is crucial for the effective exercise of power, as it reduces the need for coercion and fosters cooperation between the government and the governed.
The liberal_Democracy_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Democratic Political Participation' Causal relation: {Democracy, Liberal_Democracy} → participatesIn → {Politics, Representative_Democracy} Semantical explanation of liberal_Democracy_ID000001: Liberal democracy is a system of democracy that combines parliamentary institutions, such as free and fair elections, representative government, and the rule of law, with a commitment to the protection of individual rights and freedoms, coupled with a free market system in the area of economic production. In a liberal democracy, the government's power is limited by a constitution and the separation of powers, and citizens have fundamental rights such as freedom of speech, assembly, and religion. The economic aspect of liberal democracy typically involves a capitalist system with private ownership of property and the means of production, although there may be varying degrees of government regulation and social welfare provisions. This form of government is prevalent in many Western industrialised nations and is characterised by a balance between individual liberties and democratic governance.
The life_History_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Biographical Research Methods' Causal relation: {Biographical_Research, Life_History} → interviews → {Interview, Oral_History} Semantical explanation of life_History_ID000001: Life histories are in-depth studies of the overall lives of individuals, often using a qualitative research approach that gathers detailed information about a person's experiences, perspectives, and the significant events that have shaped their life course. These studies often rely on a combination of data sources, including self-reporting through interviews, personal narratives, and autobiographies, as well as documentary evidence such as letters, diaries, photographs, and official records. The goal of life history research is to understand the individual's life within its broader social, cultural, and historical context, exploring how personal experiences intersect with larger social forces and patterns. This method can provide rich insights into topics such as identity formation, social change, the impact of historical events on individuals, and the subjective meanings people attach to their lives.
The life_History_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Qualitative Research Interviewing' Causal relation: {Interview, Biographical_Method} → interviews → {Qualitative_Research, Life_History} Semantical explanation of life_History_ID000002: Life histories are in-depth studies of the overall lives of individuals, often using a qualitative research approach that gathers detailed information about a person's experiences, perspectives, and the significant events that have shaped their life course. These studies often rely on a combination of data sources, including self-reporting through interviews, personal narratives, and autobiographies, as well as documentary evidence such as letters, diaries, photographs, and official records. The goal of life history research is to understand the individual's life within its broader social, cultural, and historical context, exploring how personal experiences intersect with larger social forces and patterns. This method can provide rich insights into topics such as identity formation, social change, the impact of historical events on individuals, and the subjective meanings people attach to their lives.
The marriage_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Family Structure Regulation' Causal relation: {Law, State} → regulates → {Marriage, Family} Semantical explanation of marriage_ID000001: Marriage is a legally and socially sanctioned relationship between two or more people (though typically two), involving economic cooperation, emotional intimacy, and often normative sexual activity and child-bearing, which the individuals and society expect to be enduring or relatively permanent. The definition and practices of marriage vary significantly across cultures and have evolved over time, with changes in who can marry (e.g., same-sex marriage), the purposes of marriage (beyond procreation to include companionship and personal fulfillment), and the prevalence of different forms of marriage (e.g., monogamy, polygamy). Marriage often establishes kinship ties and defines rights and obligations between spouses and their families. It is a fundamental social institution that plays a crucial role in regulating sexual behaviour, organizing family life, and transmitting social status and property across generations.
The mass_Media_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Hegemony Establishment' Causal relation: {Hegemony, Power_Elite} → controls → {Culture, Mass_Media} Semantical explanation of mass_Media_ID000001: Mass media refers to forms of communication, such as newspapers, magazines, radio, television, films, and the internet, that are designed to reach and influence very large audiences, often simultaneously. These media play a significant role in shaping public opinion, disseminating information, transmitting cultural values and norms, and providing entertainment. The development and widespread availability of mass media have had a profound impact on society, influencing everything from political campaigns and consumer behaviour to popular culture and social movements. Sociologists study mass media to understand its effects on individuals and society, including issues related to media ownership, content, audience reception, and the role of media in shaping social identities and perceptions of reality. The rise of digital and social media has further transformed the landscape of mass communication, creating new opportunities and challenges for how information is produced, distributed, and consumed.
The mass_Media_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Elite Power and Institutional Control' Causal relation: {Elite_Model, Power_Elite} → controls → {Political_System, Mass_Media} Semantical explanation of mass_Media_ID000002: Mass media refers to forms of communication, such as newspapers, magazines, radio, television, films, and the internet, that are designed to reach and influence very large audiences, often simultaneously. These media play a significant role in shaping public opinion, disseminating information, transmitting cultural values and norms, and providing entertainment. The development and widespread availability of mass media have had a profound impact on society, influencing everything from political campaigns and consumer behaviour to popular culture and social movements. Sociologists study mass media to understand its effects on individuals and society, including issues related to media ownership, content, audience reception, and the role of media in shaping social identities and perceptions of reality. The rise of digital and social media has further transformed the landscape of mass communication, creating new opportunities and challenges for how information is produced, distributed, and consumed.
The mass_Media_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Mass Communication Process' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Multimedia} → communicatesWith → {Public_Sphere, Media_And_Communication} Semantical explanation of mass_Media_ID000003: Mass media refers to forms of communication, such as newspapers, magazines, radio, television, films, and the internet, that are designed to reach and influence very large audiences, often simultaneously. These media play a significant role in shaping public opinion, disseminating information, transmitting cultural values and norms, and providing entertainment. The development and widespread availability of mass media have had a profound impact on society, influencing everything from political campaigns and consumer behaviour to popular culture and social movements. Sociologists study mass media to understand its effects on individuals and society, including issues related to media ownership, content, audience reception, and the role of media in shaping social identities and perceptions of reality. The rise of digital and social media has further transformed the landscape of mass communication, creating new opportunities and challenges for how information is produced, distributed, and consumed.
The mass_Media_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Mass Media Influences Public Sphere' Causal relation: {Mass_Media} → hasInfluence → {Public_Sphere} Semantical explanation of mass_Media_ID000004: Mass media refers to forms of communication, such as newspapers, magazines, radio, television, films, and the internet, that are designed to reach and influence very large audiences, often simultaneously. These media play a significant role in shaping public opinion, disseminating information, transmitting cultural values and norms, and providing entertainment. The development and widespread availability of mass media have had a profound impact on society, influencing everything from political campaigns and consumer behaviour to popular culture and social movements. Sociologists study mass media to understand its effects on individuals and society, including issues related to media ownership, content, audience reception, and the role of media in shaping social identities and perceptions of reality. The rise of digital and social media has further transformed the landscape of mass communication, creating new opportunities and challenges for how information is produced, distributed, and consumed.
The mass_Media_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media Agenda Setting' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Media_And_Communication} → influencesHistorically → {Political_Ideologies_And_Movement, Political_System} Semantical explanation of mass_Media_ID000005: Mass media refers to forms of communication, such as newspapers, magazines, radio, television, films, and the internet, that are designed to reach and influence very large audiences, often simultaneously. These media play a significant role in shaping public opinion, disseminating information, transmitting cultural values and norms, and providing entertainment. The development and widespread availability of mass media have had a profound impact on society, influencing everything from political campaigns and consumer behaviour to popular culture and social movements. Sociologists study mass media to understand its effects on individuals and society, including issues related to media ownership, content, audience reception, and the role of media in shaping social identities and perceptions of reality. The rise of digital and social media has further transformed the landscape of mass communication, creating new opportunities and challenges for how information is produced, distributed, and consumed.
The mass_Media_ID000006 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media and Crime Perception' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Crime} → influencesHistorically → {Social_Control, Deviance} Semantical explanation of mass_Media_ID000006: Mass media refers to forms of communication, such as newspapers, magazines, radio, television, films, and the internet, that are designed to reach and influence very large audiences, often simultaneously. These media play a significant role in shaping public opinion, disseminating information, transmitting cultural values and norms, and providing entertainment. The development and widespread availability of mass media have had a profound impact on society, influencing everything from political campaigns and consumer behaviour to popular culture and social movements. Sociologists study mass media to understand its effects on individuals and society, including issues related to media ownership, content, audience reception, and the role of media in shaping social identities and perceptions of reality. The rise of digital and social media has further transformed the landscape of mass communication, creating new opportunities and challenges for how information is produced, distributed, and consumed.
The mass_Media_ID000007 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media and Youth Cultural Influence' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Peer_Group, Youth_Culture} → hasInfluence → {Fashion, Culture} Semantical explanation of mass_Media_ID000007: Mass media refers to forms of communication, such as newspapers, magazines, radio, television, films, and the internet, that are designed to reach and influence very large audiences, often simultaneously. These media play a significant role in shaping public opinion, disseminating information, transmitting cultural values and norms, and providing entertainment. The development and widespread availability of mass media have had a profound impact on society, influencing everything from political campaigns and consumer behaviour to popular culture and social movements. Sociologists study mass media to understand its effects on individuals and society, including issues related to media ownership, content, audience reception, and the role of media in shaping social identities and perceptions of reality. The rise of digital and social media has further transformed the landscape of mass communication, creating new opportunities and challenges for how information is produced, distributed, and consumed.
The mass_Media_ID000008 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media Influence and Public Opinion' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Media_Text} → hasInfluence → {Public_Sphere, Politics} Semantical explanation of mass_Media_ID000008: Mass media refers to forms of communication, such as newspapers, magazines, radio, television, films, and the internet, that are designed to reach and influence very large audiences, often simultaneously. These media play a significant role in shaping public opinion, disseminating information, transmitting cultural values and norms, and providing entertainment. The development and widespread availability of mass media have had a profound impact on society, influencing everything from political campaigns and consumer behaviour to popular culture and social movements. Sociologists study mass media to understand its effects on individuals and society, including issues related to media ownership, content, audience reception, and the role of media in shaping social identities and perceptions of reality. The rise of digital and social media has further transformed the landscape of mass communication, creating new opportunities and challenges for how information is produced, distributed, and consumed.
The mass_Media_ID000009 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media Influence on Social Consciousness' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Internet} → hasInfluence → {Social_Consciousness_And_Theoretical_Quality, Public_Sphere} Semantical explanation of mass_Media_ID000009: Mass media refers to forms of communication, such as newspapers, magazines, radio, television, films, and the internet, that are designed to reach and influence very large audiences, often simultaneously. These media play a significant role in shaping public opinion, disseminating information, transmitting cultural values and norms, and providing entertainment. The development and widespread availability of mass media have had a profound impact on society, influencing everything from political campaigns and consumer behaviour to popular culture and social movements. Sociologists study mass media to understand its effects on individuals and society, including issues related to media ownership, content, audience reception, and the role of media in shaping social identities and perceptions of reality. The rise of digital and social media has further transformed the landscape of mass communication, creating new opportunities and challenges for how information is produced, distributed, and consumed.
The mass_Media_ID000010 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media Information Control' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Power_Elite} → controls → {Public_Sphere, Hegemony} Semantical explanation of mass_Media_ID000010: Mass media refers to forms of communication, such as newspapers, magazines, radio, television, films, and the internet, that are designed to reach and influence very large audiences, often simultaneously. These media play a significant role in shaping public opinion, disseminating information, transmitting cultural values and norms, and providing entertainment. The development and widespread availability of mass media have had a profound impact on society, influencing everything from political campaigns and consumer behaviour to popular culture and social movements. Sociologists study mass media to understand its effects on individuals and society, including issues related to media ownership, content, audience reception, and the role of media in shaping social identities and perceptions of reality. The rise of digital and social media has further transformed the landscape of mass communication, creating new opportunities and challenges for how information is produced, distributed, and consumed.
The mass_Media_ID000011 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Media and Network Society' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Network} → influencesHistorically → {Identity, Social_Network} Semantical explanation of mass_Media_ID000011: Mass media refers to forms of communication, such as newspapers, magazines, radio, television, films, and the internet, that are designed to reach and influence very large audiences, often simultaneously. These media play a significant role in shaping public opinion, disseminating information, transmitting cultural values and norms, and providing entertainment. The development and widespread availability of mass media have had a profound impact on society, influencing everything from political campaigns and consumer behaviour to popular culture and social movements. Sociologists study mass media to understand its effects on individuals and society, including issues related to media ownership, content, audience reception, and the role of media in shaping social identities and perceptions of reality. The rise of digital and social media has further transformed the landscape of mass communication, creating new opportunities and challenges for how information is produced, distributed, and consumed.
The mass_Production_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Capitalist Labor Exploitation' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Mass_Production} → exploits → {Working_Class, Proletariat} Semantical explanation of mass_Production_ID000001: Mass production is a system of manufacturing that involves the production of large quantities of standardised goods using machine power, specialised labor performing repetitive tasks, and often an assembly-line process. This method of production was a key outcome of the Industrial Revolution, particularly associated with the Fordist era of the early to mid-20th century, and it led to significant increases in efficiency and the availability of affordable consumer goods. Mass production relies on a high degree of division of labor and the use of interchangeable parts to streamline the manufacturing process. While it has been instrumental in driving economic growth and raising living standards, it has also been criticised for its potential to create monotonous and alienating work for employees and for its lack of flexibility in responding to diverse consumer demands. More recent trends in manufacturing include flexible production, which allows for greater customisation and variety.
The mass_Production_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Capitalist Production and Class Formation' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Mass_Production, Industrialism} → stratifies → {Working_Class, Bourgeoisie, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of mass_Production_ID000002: Mass production is a system of manufacturing that involves the production of large quantities of standardised goods using machine power, specialised labor performing repetitive tasks, and often an assembly-line process. This method of production was a key outcome of the Industrial Revolution, particularly associated with the Fordist era of the early to mid-20th century, and it led to significant increases in efficiency and the availability of affordable consumer goods. Mass production relies on a high degree of division of labor and the use of interchangeable parts to streamline the manufacturing process. While it has been instrumental in driving economic growth and raising living standards, it has also been criticised for its potential to create monotonous and alienating work for employees and for its lack of flexibility in responding to diverse consumer demands. More recent trends in manufacturing include flexible production, which allows for greater customisation and variety.
The means_Of_Production_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Capitalist Property Relations and Market Structure' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Means_Of_Production} → economicallyRelatedTo → {Working_Class, Bourgeoisie} Semantical explanation of means_Of_Production_ID000001: The means of production, a core concept in Marxist theory, refers to the resources, tools, technologies, land, factories, and other infrastructure whereby the production of material goods is carried on in a society. This concept encompasses not just the physical technology involved in production but also the social relations between the producers (e.g., the relationship between the owners of the means of production and the workers who use them). According to Marx, the ownership and control of the means of production are central to understanding the structure of society and the distribution of power and wealth. In capitalist societies, the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) owns and controls the means of production, while the proletariat (working class) must sell their labor power to the bourgeoisie to survive, leading to inherent inequalities and class conflict.
The means_Of_Production_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Exploitation and Class Relations' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Means_Of_Production} → exploits → {Proletariat, Bourgeoisie} Semantical explanation of means_Of_Production_ID000002: The means of production, a core concept in Marxist theory, refers to the resources, tools, technologies, land, factories, and other infrastructure whereby the production of material goods is carried on in a society. This concept encompasses not just the physical technology involved in production but also the social relations between the producers (e.g., the relationship between the owners of the means of production and the workers who use them). According to Marx, the ownership and control of the means of production are central to understanding the structure of society and the distribution of power and wealth. In capitalist societies, the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) owns and controls the means of production, while the proletariat (working class) must sell their labor power to the bourgeoisie to survive, leading to inherent inequalities and class conflict.
The means_Of_Production_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Private Property Relations' Causal relation: {Capitalist, Bourgeoisie} → owns → {Means_Of_Production, Monopoly} Semantical explanation of means_Of_Production_ID000003: The means of production, a core concept in Marxist theory, refers to the resources, tools, technologies, land, factories, and other infrastructure whereby the production of material goods is carried on in a society. This concept encompasses not just the physical technology involved in production but also the social relations between the producers (e.g., the relationship between the owners of the means of production and the workers who use them). According to Marx, the ownership and control of the means of production are central to understanding the structure of society and the distribution of power and wealth. In capitalist societies, the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) owns and controls the means of production, while the proletariat (working class) must sell their labor power to the bourgeoisie to survive, leading to inherent inequalities and class conflict.
The media_And_Communication_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Mass Communication Process' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Multimedia} → communicatesWith → {Public_Sphere, Media_And_Communication} Semantical explanation of media_And_Communication_ID000001: Media and Communication is a broad sociological domain that systematically studies the diverse means, processes, and effects through which information, ideas, and messages are produced, disseminated, and received within society, and their profound impact on individuals, social groups, and social structures. This field encompasses various forms of mass media (e.g., television, radio, newspapers, film), digital media (e.g., the internet, cyberspace, multimedia, social media), and telecommunications. It examines how communication technologies shape social interaction (e.g., non-verbal communication, semiotics), the construction of meaning, and the formation of public opinion. The domain also analyses media texts (media products), media industries, media consumption patterns, and the role of communication in cultural transmission, social change, political processes, and the perpetuation or challenge of social inequalities. It delves into topics such as media ownership, content analysis, communication flows, and the digital divide, highlighting the pervasive influence of media in contemporary social life.
The media_And_Communication_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media Agenda Setting' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Media_And_Communication} → influencesHistorically → {Political_Ideologies_And_Movement, Political_System} Semantical explanation of media_And_Communication_ID000002: Media and Communication is a broad sociological domain that systematically studies the diverse means, processes, and effects through which information, ideas, and messages are produced, disseminated, and received within society, and their profound impact on individuals, social groups, and social structures. This field encompasses various forms of mass media (e.g., television, radio, newspapers, film), digital media (e.g., the internet, cyberspace, multimedia, social media), and telecommunications. It examines how communication technologies shape social interaction (e.g., non-verbal communication, semiotics), the construction of meaning, and the formation of public opinion. The domain also analyses media texts (media products), media industries, media consumption patterns, and the role of communication in cultural transmission, social change, political processes, and the perpetuation or challenge of social inequalities. It delves into topics such as media ownership, content analysis, communication flows, and the digital divide, highlighting the pervasive influence of media in contemporary social life.
The media_Text_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media Influence and Public Opinion' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Media_Text} → hasInfluence → {Public_Sphere, Politics} Semantical explanation of media_Text_ID000001: Media texts encompass all forms of media products, including television programmes, films, CDs, books, newspapers, website pages, social media posts, and advertisements, which are created and disseminated to communicate information, ideas, entertainment, or persuasion to an audience. These texts are not simply neutral carriers of information but are constructed with specific intentions and can be analysed for their content, form, audience, and the social, cultural, and political messages they convey. The study of media texts involves examining their production, distribution, and consumption, as well as their potential effects on individuals and society. Understanding media texts is crucial in sociology for analysing how media shapes our perceptions of the world, influences our beliefs and values, and contributes to the construction of social reality.
The megalopolis_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Spatial Social Organisation' Causal relation: {Suburb, Megalopolis} → inhabits → {Defended_Neighborhood, Squatter_Settlement} Semantical explanation of megalopolis_ID000001: A megalopolis is a vast urban region that contains a number of cities and their surrounding suburbs, forming an interconnected network of metropolitan areas that have grown together over time. These regions are characterised by high population density, extensive infrastructure connecting the different urban centers, and significant economic and social integration across the area. Examples of megalopolises include the BosWash corridor in the northeastern United States, which stretches from Boston to Washington, D.C., and the Tokaido corridor in Japan, connecting Tokyo and Osaka. The development of megalopolises reflects the increasing urbanisation and interconnectedness of modern societies, posing unique challenges and opportunities for urban planning, transportation, and regional governance.
The metropolis_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Urban Development and Social Change' Causal relation: {Urbanisation, Industrial_Revolution} → urbanises → {Urban_Ecology, Metropolis} Semantical explanation of metropolis_ID000001: A metropolis is a large city that socially and economically dominates an urban area, often serving as a major center for commerce, culture, and innovation within a region or even a country. It typically has a high population density, a diverse economy, and a significant influence on the surrounding areas in terms of employment, services, and cultural trends. A metropolis often attracts people from smaller towns and rural areas seeking opportunities and amenities not available elsewhere. The term can also refer to the central city of a metropolitan area, which includes the city itself and its surrounding suburbs and exurbs that are economically and socially integrated with it. Metropolises play a crucial role in the global economy and are often hubs for international trade, finance, and communication.
The migration_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Inequality and Migration' Causal relation: {Economic_System, Outsourcing} → causallyInfluencedBy → {Migration, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of migration_ID000001: Migration refers to the movement of people into and out of a particular territory, which can occur within a country (internal migration) or across national borders (international migration). This movement can be temporary or permanent and can be driven by a variety of factors, including economic opportunities, political instability, environmental changes, social networks, and personal aspirations. Immigration involves the movement of people into a new country to settle, while emigration refers to the movement of people out of a country to live elsewhere. Migration patterns can have significant demographic, economic, social, and cultural impacts on both the areas of origin and the areas of destination, influencing population size and composition, labor markets, cultural diversity, and social integration. Sociologists study migration to understand its causes and consequences, the experiences of migrants, and the policies and social responses to migration flows.
The migration_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Integration and Labor Migration' Causal relation: {Economic_System, Economic_Interdependence} → influencesHistorically → {Migration, Cultural_Diversity} Semantical explanation of migration_ID000002: Migration refers to the movement of people into and out of a particular territory, which can occur within a country (internal migration) or across national borders (international migration). This movement can be temporary or permanent and can be driven by a variety of factors, including economic opportunities, political instability, environmental changes, social networks, and personal aspirations. Immigration involves the movement of people into a new country to settle, while emigration refers to the movement of people out of a country to live elsewhere. Migration patterns can have significant demographic, economic, social, and cultural impacts on both the areas of origin and the areas of destination, influencing population size and composition, labor markets, cultural diversity, and social integration. Sociologists study migration to understand its causes and consequences, the experiences of migrants, and the policies and social responses to migration flows.
The migration_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Migration and Urban Diversity' Causal relation: {Migration, Population} → influencesHistorically → {Urbanism, Cultural_Diversity} Semantical explanation of migration_ID000003: Migration refers to the movement of people into and out of a particular territory, which can occur within a country (internal migration) or across national borders (international migration). This movement can be temporary or permanent and can be driven by a variety of factors, including economic opportunities, political instability, environmental changes, social networks, and personal aspirations. Immigration involves the movement of people into a new country to settle, while emigration refers to the movement of people out of a country to live elsewhere. Migration patterns can have significant demographic, economic, social, and cultural impacts on both the areas of origin and the areas of destination, influencing population size and composition, labor markets, cultural diversity, and social integration. Sociologists study migration to understand its causes and consequences, the experiences of migrants, and the policies and social responses to migration flows.
The migration_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Population Migration Patterns' Causal relation: {Migration, Immigration} → migrates → {Diaspora, Push_And_Pull_Factor} Semantical explanation of migration_ID000004: Migration refers to the movement of people into and out of a particular territory, which can occur within a country (internal migration) or across national borders (international migration). This movement can be temporary or permanent and can be driven by a variety of factors, including economic opportunities, political instability, environmental changes, social networks, and personal aspirations. Immigration involves the movement of people into a new country to settle, while emigration refers to the movement of people out of a country to live elsewhere. Migration patterns can have significant demographic, economic, social, and cultural impacts on both the areas of origin and the areas of destination, influencing population size and composition, labor markets, cultural diversity, and social integration. Sociologists study migration to understand its causes and consequences, the experiences of migrants, and the policies and social responses to migration flows.
The migration_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Rural-Urban Population Movement' Causal relation: {Urbanisation, Industrial_Society} → migrates → {Migration, Demographic_Transition} Semantical explanation of migration_ID000005: Migration refers to the movement of people into and out of a particular territory, which can occur within a country (internal migration) or across national borders (international migration). This movement can be temporary or permanent and can be driven by a variety of factors, including economic opportunities, political instability, environmental changes, social networks, and personal aspirations. Immigration involves the movement of people into a new country to settle, while emigration refers to the movement of people out of a country to live elsewhere. Migration patterns can have significant demographic, economic, social, and cultural impacts on both the areas of origin and the areas of destination, influencing population size and composition, labor markets, cultural diversity, and social integration. Sociologists study migration to understand its causes and consequences, the experiences of migrants, and the policies and social responses to migration flows.
The migration_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Suburbanisation and Spatial Restructuring' Causal relation: {Suburb} → spatiallyRelatedTo → {Segregation, Migration} Semantical explanation of migration_ID000006: Migration refers to the movement of people into and out of a particular territory, which can occur within a country (internal migration) or across national borders (international migration). This movement can be temporary or permanent and can be driven by a variety of factors, including economic opportunities, political instability, environmental changes, social networks, and personal aspirations. Immigration involves the movement of people into a new country to settle, while emigration refers to the movement of people out of a country to live elsewhere. Migration patterns can have significant demographic, economic, social, and cultural impacts on both the areas of origin and the areas of destination, influencing population size and composition, labor markets, cultural diversity, and social integration. Sociologists study migration to understand its causes and consequences, the experiences of migrants, and the policies and social responses to migration flows.
The minority_Group_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Civil Rights Advocacy' Causal relation: {Affirmative_Action, Political_Action_Committee_(PAC)} → advocates → {Minority_Group, Social_Movement} Semantical explanation of minority_Group_ID000001: A minority group is a group of people in a minority in a given society who, because of their distinct physical or cultural characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disability, find themselves in situations of inequality or disadvantage within that society. Membership in a minority group is typically ascribed rather than achieved, and these groups often experience discrimination, prejudice, and limited access to power and resources compared to the dominant or majority group. The term "minority" in this sociological context does not necessarily refer to a group's numerical size but rather to its subordinate status and lack of social, economic, and political power. Minority groups often develop a strong sense of group solidarity and shared identity in response to their experiences of marginalisation.
The minority_Group_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Discrimination Processes and Social Marginalisation' Causal relation: {Discrimination, Segregation, Institutional_Discrimination} → marginalises → {Minority_Group} Semantical explanation of minority_Group_ID000002: A minority group is a group of people in a minority in a given society who, because of their distinct physical or cultural characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disability, find themselves in situations of inequality or disadvantage within that society. Membership in a minority group is typically ascribed rather than achieved, and these groups often experience discrimination, prejudice, and limited access to power and resources compared to the dominant or majority group. The term "minority" in this sociological context does not necessarily refer to a group's numerical size but rather to its subordinate status and lack of social, economic, and political power. Minority groups often develop a strong sense of group solidarity and shared identity in response to their experiences of marginalisation.
The minority_Group_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Discrimination and Social Exclusion' Causal relation: {Racism, Gender_Inequality} → discriminatesAgainst → {Social_Exclusion, Minority_Group} Semantical explanation of minority_Group_ID000003: A minority group is a group of people in a minority in a given society who, because of their distinct physical or cultural characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disability, find themselves in situations of inequality or disadvantage within that society. Membership in a minority group is typically ascribed rather than achieved, and these groups often experience discrimination, prejudice, and limited access to power and resources compared to the dominant or majority group. The term "minority" in this sociological context does not necessarily refer to a group's numerical size but rather to its subordinate status and lack of social, economic, and political power. Minority groups often develop a strong sense of group solidarity and shared identity in response to their experiences of marginalisation.
The minority_Group_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Racism Discriminates Against Minorities' Causal relation: {Racism} → discriminatesAgainst → {Minority_Group} Semantical explanation of minority_Group_ID000004: A minority group is a group of people in a minority in a given society who, because of their distinct physical or cultural characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disability, find themselves in situations of inequality or disadvantage within that society. Membership in a minority group is typically ascribed rather than achieved, and these groups often experience discrimination, prejudice, and limited access to power and resources compared to the dominant or majority group. The term "minority" in this sociological context does not necessarily refer to a group's numerical size but rather to its subordinate status and lack of social, economic, and political power. Minority groups often develop a strong sense of group solidarity and shared identity in response to their experiences of marginalisation.
The minority_Group_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Exclusion and Marginalisation' Causal relation: {Upper_Class, Bourgeoisie} → excludes → {Underclass, Minority_Group} Semantical explanation of minority_Group_ID000005: A minority group is a group of people in a minority in a given society who, because of their distinct physical or cultural characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disability, find themselves in situations of inequality or disadvantage within that society. Membership in a minority group is typically ascribed rather than achieved, and these groups often experience discrimination, prejudice, and limited access to power and resources compared to the dominant or majority group. The term "minority" in this sociological context does not necessarily refer to a group's numerical size but rather to its subordinate status and lack of social, economic, and political power. Minority groups often develop a strong sense of group solidarity and shared identity in response to their experiences of marginalisation.
The minority_Group_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Marginalisation and Deviance' Causal relation: {Deviance, Stigma} → marginalises → {Social_Exclusion, Minority_Group} Semantical explanation of minority_Group_ID000006: A minority group is a group of people in a minority in a given society who, because of their distinct physical or cultural characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disability, find themselves in situations of inequality or disadvantage within that society. Membership in a minority group is typically ascribed rather than achieved, and these groups often experience discrimination, prejudice, and limited access to power and resources compared to the dominant or majority group. The term "minority" in this sociological context does not necessarily refer to a group's numerical size but rather to its subordinate status and lack of social, economic, and political power. Minority groups often develop a strong sense of group solidarity and shared identity in response to their experiences of marginalisation.
The modernisation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Religious Secularisation Process' Causal relation: {Secularisation, Modernisation} → regulates → {Religion, Religious_Organisation} Semantical explanation of modernisation_ID000001: Modernisation is a far-reaching and complex process by which a society undergoes a fundamental transformation from traditional or less developed institutions, social structures, and cultural practices to those characteristic of more developed, industrialised, and often urbanised societies. This process typically involves significant changes in various aspects of social life, including the economy (shift from agriculture to industry), political systems (often towards democracy and increased state capacity), social structures (greater social mobility and differentiation), cultural values (emphasis on individualism, secularism, and rationality), and technology (adoption of advanced technologies). Modernisation is often associated with improvements in living standards, education, healthcare, and overall societal complexity, but it can also bring about social disruptions, inequalities, and challenges to traditional ways of life. Sociologists study modernisation to understand its causes, consequences, and the different paths that societies take in this transformative process.
The modernisation_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Technological Influence and Social Adaptation' Causal relation: {Innovation, Cultural_Pluralism} → hasInfluence → {Social_Change, Modernisation} Semantical explanation of modernisation_ID000002: Modernisation is a far-reaching and complex process by which a society undergoes a fundamental transformation from traditional or less developed institutions, social structures, and cultural practices to those characteristic of more developed, industrialised, and often urbanised societies. This process typically involves significant changes in various aspects of social life, including the economy (shift from agriculture to industry), political systems (often towards democracy and increased state capacity), social structures (greater social mobility and differentiation), cultural values (emphasis on individualism, secularism, and rationality), and technology (adoption of advanced technologies). Modernisation is often associated with improvements in living standards, education, healthcare, and overall societal complexity, but it can also bring about social disruptions, inequalities, and challenges to traditional ways of life. Sociologists study modernisation to understand its causes, consequences, and the different paths that societies take in this transformative process.
The modernisation_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Technological Innovation and Social Change' Causal relation: {Innovation, Science} → innovates → {Social_Change, Modernisation} Semantical explanation of modernisation_ID000003: Modernisation is a far-reaching and complex process by which a society undergoes a fundamental transformation from traditional or less developed institutions, social structures, and cultural practices to those characteristic of more developed, industrialised, and often urbanised societies. This process typically involves significant changes in various aspects of social life, including the economy (shift from agriculture to industry), political systems (often towards democracy and increased state capacity), social structures (greater social mobility and differentiation), cultural values (emphasis on individualism, secularism, and rationality), and technology (adoption of advanced technologies). Modernisation is often associated with improvements in living standards, education, healthcare, and overall societal complexity, but it can also bring about social disruptions, inequalities, and challenges to traditional ways of life. Sociologists study modernisation to understand its causes, consequences, and the different paths that societies take in this transformative process.
The monopoly_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Corporate Power and Economic Concentration' Causal relation: {Multinational_Corporation, Monopoly} → controls → {Economic_System, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of monopoly_ID000001: Monopoly refers to the control of a particular market or industry by a single business firm, giving that firm the power to dominate the market without significant competition. In a monopoly, the single firm is the sole producer or seller of a specific product or service, allowing it to set prices, control supply, and potentially limit consumer choice. This lack of competition can lead to higher prices, lower quality, and reduced innovation compared to markets with multiple competing firms. Monopolies can arise due to various factors, such as government regulations granting exclusive rights, the control of essential resources, high barriers to entry that prevent new firms from competing, or network effects where the value of a product or service increases as more people use it. While some monopolies may be considered natural due to inherent efficiencies of scale in certain industries, they are often subject to government regulation and antitrust laws aimed at preventing unfair competition and protecting consumer interests. The existence of a monopoly can have significant implications for the economy and society, affecting market dynamics, consumer welfare, and the distribution of wealth.
The monopoly_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Market Control' Causal relation: {Monopoly, Multinational_Corporation} → controls → {Economy, Economic_System} Semantical explanation of monopoly_ID000002: Monopoly refers to the control of a particular market or industry by a single business firm, giving that firm the power to dominate the market without significant competition. In a monopoly, the single firm is the sole producer or seller of a specific product or service, allowing it to set prices, control supply, and potentially limit consumer choice. This lack of competition can lead to higher prices, lower quality, and reduced innovation compared to markets with multiple competing firms. Monopolies can arise due to various factors, such as government regulations granting exclusive rights, the control of essential resources, high barriers to entry that prevent new firms from competing, or network effects where the value of a product or service increases as more people use it. While some monopolies may be considered natural due to inherent efficiencies of scale in certain industries, they are often subject to government regulation and antitrust laws aimed at preventing unfair competition and protecting consumer interests. The existence of a monopoly can have significant implications for the economy and society, affecting market dynamics, consumer welfare, and the distribution of wealth.
The monopoly_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Private Property Relations' Causal relation: {Capitalist, Bourgeoisie} → owns → {Means_Of_Production, Monopoly} Semantical explanation of monopoly_ID000003: Monopoly refers to the control of a particular market or industry by a single business firm, giving that firm the power to dominate the market without significant competition. In a monopoly, the single firm is the sole producer or seller of a specific product or service, allowing it to set prices, control supply, and potentially limit consumer choice. This lack of competition can lead to higher prices, lower quality, and reduced innovation compared to markets with multiple competing firms. Monopolies can arise due to various factors, such as government regulations granting exclusive rights, the control of essential resources, high barriers to entry that prevent new firms from competing, or network effects where the value of a product or service increases as more people use it. While some monopolies may be considered natural due to inherent efficiencies of scale in certain industries, they are often subject to government regulation and antitrust laws aimed at preventing unfair competition and protecting consumer interests. The existence of a monopoly can have significant implications for the economy and society, affecting market dynamics, consumer welfare, and the distribution of wealth.
The mortality_Rate_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Healthcare Mobilisation and Public Health' Causal relation: {Healthcare} → mobilises → {Mortality_Rate, Health_Maintenance_Org, Social_Epidemiology} Semantical explanation of mortality_Rate_ID000001: Mortality rate refers to the incidence of death in a given population during a specific period of time, typically one year, and is often expressed as the number of deaths per 1,000 or 100,000 people in the population. It is a fundamental demographic indicator used to assess the health status of a population, track changes in death patterns over time, and make comparisons across different groups or regions. Mortality rates can be influenced by a wide range of factors, including age structure of the population, prevalence of diseases, access to healthcare, nutritional levels, environmental conditions, and socioeconomic factors. Specific mortality rates can be calculated for different age groups, sexes, or causes of death to provide more detailed insights into the patterns of mortality within a population. The crude death rate, which measures the total number of deaths in a year per 1,000 population, is a basic but widely used measure of mortality.
The multimedia_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Mass Communication Process' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Multimedia} → communicatesWith → {Public_Sphere, Media_And_Communication} Semantical explanation of multimedia_ID000001: Multimedia refers to the combination of what used to be different media formats, requiring different technologies for access and presentation (for instance, visuals, audio, text, video, and interactive elements), integrated onto a single medium or platform, such as a CD-ROM, DVD, website, or computer application, which can be accessed and experienced using a computer or other digital device. This integration allows for a richer and more engaging user experience by combining various forms of content in a cohesive and interactive way. The rise of digital technologies has greatly facilitated the creation and distribution of multimedia content, transforming how information is communicated, entertainment is consumed, and learning takes place.
The multinational_Corporation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Corporate Labor Exploitation' Causal relation: {Multinational_Corporation, Sweatshop} → exploits → {Exploitation_Theory, Working_Class} Semantical explanation of multinational_Corporation_ID000001: Multinational corporations (MNCs) are large commercial organisations that are headquartered in one country (the home country) but conduct business operations, including production, marketing, sales, and research and development, in numerous other countries around the world (host countries). These corporations often have significant economic power and play a major role in the global economy through foreign direct investment, international trade, and the transfer of technology and capital across borders. MNCs can have both positive and negative impacts on the countries in which they operate, providing jobs and investment but also potentially raising issues related to labor practices, environmental regulations, and economic sovereignty. The study of multinational corporations is an important area in sociology, particularly in the context of globalisation and its effects on national economies and societies.
The multinational_Corporation_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Corporate Power and Economic Concentration' Causal relation: {Multinational_Corporation, Monopoly} → controls → {Economic_System, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of multinational_Corporation_ID000002: Multinational corporations (MNCs) are large commercial organisations that are headquartered in one country (the home country) but conduct business operations, including production, marketing, sales, and research and development, in numerous other countries around the world (host countries). These corporations often have significant economic power and play a major role in the global economy through foreign direct investment, international trade, and the transfer of technology and capital across borders. MNCs can have both positive and negative impacts on the countries in which they operate, providing jobs and investment but also potentially raising issues related to labor practices, environmental regulations, and economic sovereignty. The study of multinational corporations is an important area in sociology, particularly in the context of globalisation and its effects on national economies and societies.
The multinational_Corporation_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Market Competition' Causal relation: {Multinational_Corporation, Capitalism} → competesWith → {Economy, Economic_Interdependence} Semantical explanation of multinational_Corporation_ID000003: Multinational corporations (MNCs) are large commercial organisations that are headquartered in one country (the home country) but conduct business operations, including production, marketing, sales, and research and development, in numerous other countries around the world (host countries). These corporations often have significant economic power and play a major role in the global economy through foreign direct investment, international trade, and the transfer of technology and capital across borders. MNCs can have both positive and negative impacts on the countries in which they operate, providing jobs and investment but also potentially raising issues related to labor practices, environmental regulations, and economic sovereignty. The study of multinational corporations is an important area in sociology, particularly in the context of globalisation and its effects on national economies and societies.
The multinational_Corporation_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Market Control' Causal relation: {Monopoly, Multinational_Corporation} → controls → {Economy, Economic_System} Semantical explanation of multinational_Corporation_ID000004: Multinational corporations (MNCs) are large commercial organisations that are headquartered in one country (the home country) but conduct business operations, including production, marketing, sales, and research and development, in numerous other countries around the world (host countries). These corporations often have significant economic power and play a major role in the global economy through foreign direct investment, international trade, and the transfer of technology and capital across borders. MNCs can have both positive and negative impacts on the countries in which they operate, providing jobs and investment but also potentially raising issues related to labor practices, environmental regulations, and economic sovereignty. The study of multinational corporations is an important area in sociology, particularly in the context of globalisation and its effects on national economies and societies.
The multinational_Corporation_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Labor Market Employment Relations' Causal relation: {Multinational_Corporation, Bureaucracy} → employs → {Working_Class, Proletariat} Semantical explanation of multinational_Corporation_ID000005: Multinational corporations (MNCs) are large commercial organisations that are headquartered in one country (the home country) but conduct business operations, including production, marketing, sales, and research and development, in numerous other countries around the world (host countries). These corporations often have significant economic power and play a major role in the global economy through foreign direct investment, international trade, and the transfer of technology and capital across borders. MNCs can have both positive and negative impacts on the countries in which they operate, providing jobs and investment but also potentially raising issues related to labor practices, environmental regulations, and economic sovereignty. The study of multinational corporations is an important area in sociology, particularly in the context of globalisation and its effects on national economies and societies.
The multinational_Corporation_ID000006 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'World System Economic Integration' Causal relation: {World_System, Multinational_Corporation} → controls → {Core_Country, Peripheral_Country} Semantical explanation of multinational_Corporation_ID000006: Multinational corporations (MNCs) are large commercial organisations that are headquartered in one country (the home country) but conduct business operations, including production, marketing, sales, and research and development, in numerous other countries around the world (host countries). These corporations often have significant economic power and play a major role in the global economy through foreign direct investment, international trade, and the transfer of technology and capital across borders. MNCs can have both positive and negative impacts on the countries in which they operate, providing jobs and investment but also potentially raising issues related to labor practices, environmental regulations, and economic sovereignty. The study of multinational corporations is an important area in sociology, particularly in the context of globalisation and its effects on national economies and societies.
The nation_State_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Democratic Political Governance' Causal relation: {Democracy, Representative_Democracy} → governs → {Political_System, Nation_State} Semantical explanation of nation_State_ID000001: A nation state is a political apparatus that exercises sovereignty and authority over a specific territory, with a population of citizens who typically share a strong sense of national identity, often reinforced by common cultural characteristics such as language, religion, and a perceived shared history, and whose authority is backed up by military force and a nationalistic, sovereign creed. The concept of a nation state combines the political entity of the state with the cultural and social entity of the nation, where the state is seen as representing and protecting the interests and identity of the nation within its defined borders. The rise of the nation state is a key feature of modern political history, particularly in Europe, and it continues to be the dominant form of political organisation globally, although the relationship between nation and state can be complex and contested, especially in diverse or multinational states.
The nation_State_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Nationalism and State Formation' Causal relation: {Nation_State, Nationalism} → socialises → {Politics, Identity} Semantical explanation of nation_State_ID000002: A nation state is a political apparatus that exercises sovereignty and authority over a specific territory, with a population of citizens who typically share a strong sense of national identity, often reinforced by common cultural characteristics such as language, religion, and a perceived shared history, and whose authority is backed up by military force and a nationalistic, sovereign creed. The concept of a nation state combines the political entity of the state with the cultural and social entity of the nation, where the state is seen as representing and protecting the interests and identity of the nation within its defined borders. The rise of the nation state is a key feature of modern political history, particularly in Europe, and it continues to be the dominant form of political organisation globally, although the relationship between nation and state can be complex and contested, especially in diverse or multinational states.
The nationalism_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Nationalism and State Formation' Causal relation: {Nation_State, Nationalism} → socialises → {Politics, Identity} Semantical explanation of nationalism_ID000001: Nationalism is a complex set of beliefs, political ideas, and social movements that express a strong sense of identification with a given national community and pursue the interests, unity, and sovereignty of that community, often prioritizing national interests above all other considerations. Nationalism typically involves a belief in the unique character and destiny of one's nation, a sense of pride and loyalty to the nation, and a desire to promote its culture, interests, and well-being. It can be a powerful force in shaping political landscapes, driving movements for national independence, unification, or expansion, and influencing international relations. While nationalism can foster social cohesion and a sense of collective identity, it can also lead to exclusionary attitudes towards other nations and minority groups, as well as to conflict and rivalry between nations.
The natural_Environment_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Environmental Mobilisation and Sustainability' Causal relation: {Environmental_Sociology, Science} → mobilises → {Sustainable_Development, Natural_Environment} Semantical explanation of natural_Environment_ID000001: The natural environment encompasses the Earth's surface and atmosphere, including all living organisms (plants, animals, microorganisms) as well as the non-living components such as the air, water, soil, rocks, and other resources that are necessary to sustain life and ecological systems. It represents the part of the environment that is not directly created or significantly altered by human activities, although human actions increasingly have a global impact on natural environments. The study of the natural environment is crucial for understanding ecological processes, biodiversity, and the interactions between living organisms and their surroundings. It is also essential for addressing environmental challenges such as pollution, resource depletion, and climate change, which have significant social and ecological consequences.
The negotiation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Coordination and Conflict Resolution' Causal relation: {Negotiation, Conflict_Perspective} → coordinates → {Social_Movement, Social_Cohesion} Semantical explanation of negotiation_ID000001: Negotiation is a fundamental social process that involves the attempt by two or more parties with differing interests or goals to reach a mutually acceptable agreement concerning some objective, issue, or course of action. It typically involves communication, discussion, and bargaining, where each party may make concessions or compromises to find a common ground that satisfies their essential needs or interests. Negotiation can occur in various contexts, from interpersonal relationships and business transactions to political and international relations. The success of negotiation often depends on factors such as the parties' willingness to compromise, their communication skills, their understanding of each other's needs and interests, and the power dynamics between them. It is a key mechanism for conflict resolution, cooperation, and the achievement of shared goals in diverse social settings.
The neo-colonialism_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Colonial Economic Extraction' Causal relation: {Colonialism, Neo-colonialism} → exploits → {Exploitation_Theory, Underdevelopment} Semantical explanation of neo-colonialism_ID000001: Neo-colonialism refers to a new form of global power relationship that involves not direct political control over former colonies, but rather economic exploitation and dominance exerted by powerful multinational corporations and global financial institutions based in developed countries over less developed nations. In this system, former colonies or developing countries may be politically independent but remain economically dependent on and vulnerable to the interests of these powerful economic actors from the developed world. This dependence can manifest through control over key industries, trade imbalances, debt burdens, and the influence of international financial policies that may benefit wealthy nations at the expense of poorer ones. Neo-colonialism suggests that the patterns of global inequality established during the colonial era persist through economic mechanisms rather than direct political rule.
The neoliberalism_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Marginalisation Process' Causal relation: {Neoliberalism, Deindustrialisation} → marginalises → {Underground_Economy, Underclass} Semantical explanation of neoliberalism_ID000001: Neoliberalism is a dominant economic belief system and political ideology that advocates for free market forces as the primary route to economic growth and prosperity, achieved by minimizing government restrictions and interventions on business and the economy. Key tenets of neoliberalism include deregulation, privatisation of state-owned enterprises, reduced government spending on social programs, free trade, and fiscal austerity. This ideology gained prominence in the late 20th century and has influenced economic policies in many countries around the world, often leading to increased globalisation and a greater role for the private sector in the economy. While proponents argue that neoliberal policies promote efficiency, innovation, and economic growth, critics point to potential negative consequences such as increased income inequality, social instability, and environmental degradation due to the prioritisation of market forces over social and environmental concerns.
The neoliberalism_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Marginalisation Mechanisms' Causal relation: {Neoliberalism, Structural_Functionalism} → marginalises → {Social_Exclusion, Relative_Deprivation} Semantical explanation of neoliberalism_ID000002: Neoliberalism is a dominant economic belief system and political ideology that advocates for free market forces as the primary route to economic growth and prosperity, achieved by minimizing government restrictions and interventions on business and the economy. Key tenets of neoliberalism include deregulation, privatisation of state-owned enterprises, reduced government spending on social programs, free trade, and fiscal austerity. This ideology gained prominence in the late 20th century and has influenced economic policies in many countries around the world, often leading to increased globalisation and a greater role for the private sector in the economy. While proponents argue that neoliberal policies promote efficiency, innovation, and economic growth, critics point to potential negative consequences such as increased income inequality, social instability, and environmental degradation due to the prioritisation of market forces over social and environmental concerns.
The network_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Media and Network Society' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Network} → influencesHistorically → {Identity, Social_Network} Semantical explanation of network_ID000001: A network in sociology refers to a set of informal and formal social ties that connects individuals, groups, or organisations to each other, forming a web of relationships through which information, resources, and social support can flow. These networks can vary in size, density, and complexity, ranging from small, close-knit groups to large, loosely connected global networks facilitated by technology. Social networks play a crucial role in various aspects of social life, influencing everything from job opportunities and social mobility to the spread of ideas and social support systems. The strength and nature of these ties (e.g., strong vs. weak ties) can have different implications for the individuals involved and the functioning of the network as a whole. Sociologists study social networks to understand social capital, social influence, and the structure of social relationships at different levels of analysis.
The network_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Network Mobilisation and Collective Action' Causal relation: {Social_Network, Network} → mobilises → {Collective_Behaviour, Social_Movement} Semantical explanation of network_ID000002: A network in sociology refers to a set of informal and formal social ties that connects individuals, groups, or organisations to each other, forming a web of relationships through which information, resources, and social support can flow. These networks can vary in size, density, and complexity, ranging from small, close-knit groups to large, loosely connected global networks facilitated by technology. Social networks play a crucial role in various aspects of social life, influencing everything from job opportunities and social mobility to the spread of ideas and social support systems. The strength and nature of these ties (e.g., strong vs. weak ties) can have different implications for the individuals involved and the functioning of the network as a whole. Sociologists study social networks to understand social capital, social influence, and the structure of social relationships at different levels of analysis.
The new_Social_Movement_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Movement Political Impact' Causal relation: {Social_Movement, New_Social_Movement} → hasInfluence → {Political_System, Democracy} Semantical explanation of new_Social_Movement_ID000001: New social movements (NSMs) are organised collective activities that promote autonomy, self-determination, and improvements in the quality of life, often focusing on issues beyond traditional class-based or economic concerns. These movements typically emerge in post-industrial societies and address issues such as environmental protection, human rights, peace, gender equality, and social justice, often mobilizing through grassroots activism, non-hierarchical structures, and the use of media and technology to raise awareness and advocate for change. NSMs often emphasise identity, culture, and the transformation of values and social norms, rather than solely seeking political power or economic redistribution. They represent a shift in the focus of social movements towards broader social and cultural issues and often involve diverse participants united by shared values and concerns about the direction of modern society.
The norm_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Coordination and Collective Action' Causal relation: {Norm, Language} → coordinates → {Collective_Behaviour, Social_Structure} Semantical explanation of norm_ID000001: Norm are the rules, standards, and expectations of behaviour that are widely shared and understood within a society or group, guiding the actions and interactions of its members and defining what is considered acceptable, appropriate, and desirable in various social situations. Norm can be formal, such as laws and written rules with specific sanctions for violations, or informal, such as customs, traditions, and social etiquette that are maintained through social approval or disapproval. They provide a framework for social order and cohesion, helping individuals to anticipate how others will behave and to know how they themselves are expected to act. Norm vary across cultures and can change over time within a society, reflecting evolving values and beliefs.
The norm_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Regulation and Norm Enforcement' Causal relation: {Social_Control, Norm} → regulates → {Deviance, Formal_Social_Control} Semantical explanation of norm_ID000002: Norm are the rules, standards, and expectations of behaviour that are widely shared and understood within a society or group, guiding the actions and interactions of its members and defining what is considered acceptable, appropriate, and desirable in various social situations. Norm can be formal, such as laws and written rules with specific sanctions for violations, or informal, such as customs, traditions, and social etiquette that are maintained through social approval or disapproval. They provide a framework for social order and cohesion, helping individuals to anticipate how others will behave and to know how they themselves are expected to act. Norm vary across cultures and can change over time within a society, reflecting evolving values and beliefs.
The nuclear_Family_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Family Formation Processes' Causal relation: {Nuclear_Family, Extended_Family} → adopts → {Adoption, Kinship} Semantical explanation of nuclear_Family_ID000001: A nuclear family is a family group that consists of a mother, a father (or one of these parents in the case of single-parent families), and their dependent children living together in the same household. This family structure is often considered the traditional or dominant family form in many Western industrialised societies, although diverse family arrangements are increasingly common. The nuclear family is typically characterised by close emotional bonds, economic cooperation, and the responsibility of the adult members for the upbringing and well-being of their children. It plays a crucial role in the socialisation of children and provides a primary source of social support for its members.
The nuclear_Family_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Primary Socialisation Processes' Causal relation: {Nuclear_Family, Extended_Family} → socialises → {Primary_Socialisation, Secondary_Socialisation} Semantical explanation of nuclear_Family_ID000002: A nuclear family is a family group that consists of a mother, a father (or one of these parents in the case of single-parent families), and their dependent children living together in the same household. This family structure is often considered the traditional or dominant family form in many Western industrialised societies, although diverse family arrangements are increasingly common. The nuclear family is typically characterised by close emotional bonds, economic cooperation, and the responsibility of the adult members for the upbringing and well-being of their children. It plays a crucial role in the socialisation of children and provides a primary source of social support for its members.
The observation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Participant Observation Research' Causal relation: {Participant_Observation, Ethnography} → observes → {Observation, Qualitative_Research} Semantical explanation of observation_ID000001: Observation is a fundamental research technique in which an investigator systematically collects information and data through direct participation in and/or observation of a group, tribe, community, or social setting being studied. This method is often used in qualitative research, particularly in ethnography and field studies, to gain an in-depth understanding of social behaviours, interactions, and cultural practices in their natural context. Researchers may choose to be participant observers, actively engaging in the activities of the group while also observing, or non-participant observers, observing from a distance without directly participating. Systematic observation involves developing a focused research question, defining what will be observed, and using a structured approach to record and analyse the observations. This method allows for the collection of rich, detailed data about social life as it unfolds.
The observation_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Surveillance Social Control' Causal relation: {Formal_Social_Control, State} → monitors → {Observation, Social_Control} Semantical explanation of observation_ID000002: Observation is a fundamental research technique in which an investigator systematically collects information and data through direct participation in and/or observation of a group, tribe, community, or social setting being studied. This method is often used in qualitative research, particularly in ethnography and field studies, to gain an in-depth understanding of social behaviours, interactions, and cultural practices in their natural context. Researchers may choose to be participant observers, actively engaging in the activities of the group while also observing, or non-participant observers, observing from a distance without directly participating. Systematic observation involves developing a focused research question, defining what will be observed, and using a structured approach to record and analyse the observations. This method allows for the collection of rich, detailed data about social life as it unfolds.
The operational_Definition_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Research Measurement' Causal relation: {Operational_Definition, Variable} → measures → {Correlation_Coefficient, Validity} Semantical explanation of operational_Definition_ID000001: An operational definition is a clear, precise, and specific explanation of an abstract concept that is formulated in a way that allows a researcher to measure the concept empirically and systematically. It involves defining the concept in terms of the concrete, observable, and measurable indicators or procedures that will be used to represent it in a research study. For example, if a researcher is studying the concept of "happiness," an operational definition might be the score an individual reports on a standardised happiness scale, or the frequency with which they exhibit positive emotions during an observation period. Providing operational definitions is crucial for ensuring clarity, consistency, and replicability in research, as it specifies exactly how a concept will be measured and allows other researchers to understand and potentially replicate the study.
The oral_History_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Biographical Research Methods' Causal relation: {Biographical_Research, Life_History} → interviews → {Interview, Oral_History} Semantical explanation of oral_History_ID000001: Oral history refers to a method of collecting historical information and personal narratives through interviews with people about events they witnessed or experienced earlier in their lives. These interviews are typically recorded and transcribed, providing valuable primary source material that can offer unique perspectives and details not found in written documents. Oral history is widely used in sociology, history, anthropology, and other social sciences to understand past events, social changes, and the lived experiences of individuals and communities from their own viewpoints. It can capture the nuances of personal memories, emotions, and interpretations, enriching our understanding of the past and contributing to a more diverse and inclusive historical record.
The organisation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Organisation Coordinates Activities' Causal relation: {Organisation} → coordinates → {Collective_Behaviour} Semantical explanation of organisation_ID000001: An organisation in sociology refers to a large group of individuals who are structured and coordinated to achieve specific goals or purposes, involving a definite set of authority relations, rules, and procedures that govern their activities. Organisations can range from formal entities like corporations, government agencies, and educational institutions to more informal groups with shared objectives. They are characterised by a division of labor, a hierarchy of authority, and established patterns of communication and interaction among their members. Sociologists study organisations to understand their structure, culture, dynamics, and their role in shaping social life and achieving collective goals.
The organisation_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Organisational Coordination and Efficiency' Causal relation: {Organisation, Bureaucracy} → coordinates → {Structuration, Rationalisation} Semantical explanation of organisation_ID000002: An organisation in sociology refers to a large group of individuals who are structured and coordinated to achieve specific goals or purposes, involving a definite set of authority relations, rules, and procedures that govern their activities. Organisations can range from formal entities like corporations, government agencies, and educational institutions to more informal groups with shared objectives. They are characterised by a division of labor, a hierarchy of authority, and established patterns of communication and interaction among their members. Sociologists study organisations to understand their structure, culture, dynamics, and their role in shaping social life and achieving collective goals.
The organisation_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Organisational Management Control' Causal relation: {Bureaucracy, Formal_Organisation} → manages → {Organisation, Invention} Semantical explanation of organisation_ID000003: An organisation in sociology refers to a large group of individuals who are structured and coordinated to achieve specific goals or purposes, involving a definite set of authority relations, rules, and procedures that govern their activities. Organisations can range from formal entities like corporations, government agencies, and educational institutions to more informal groups with shared objectives. They are characterised by a division of labor, a hierarchy of authority, and established patterns of communication and interaction among their members. Sociologists study organisations to understand their structure, culture, dynamics, and their role in shaping social life and achieving collective goals.
The organisation_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Institutionalisation Processes' Causal relation: {Social_Institution, Formal_Organisation} → institutionalises → {Social_Structure, Organisation} Semantical explanation of organisation_ID000004: An organisation in sociology refers to a large group of individuals who are structured and coordinated to achieve specific goals or purposes, involving a definite set of authority relations, rules, and procedures that govern their activities. Organisations can range from formal entities like corporations, government agencies, and educational institutions to more informal groups with shared objectives. They are characterised by a division of labor, a hierarchy of authority, and established patterns of communication and interaction among their members. Sociologists study organisations to understand their structure, culture, dynamics, and their role in shaping social life and achieving collective goals.
The organisation_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Urban Planning and Spatial Organisation' Causal relation: {Government, Bureaucracy} → regulates → {Urbanism, Organisation} Semantical explanation of organisation_ID000005: An organisation in sociology refers to a large group of individuals who are structured and coordinated to achieve specific goals or purposes, involving a definite set of authority relations, rules, and procedures that govern their activities. Organisations can range from formal entities like corporations, government agencies, and educational institutions to more informal groups with shared objectives. They are characterised by a division of labor, a hierarchy of authority, and established patterns of communication and interaction among their members. Sociologists study organisations to understand their structure, culture, dynamics, and their role in shaping social life and achieving collective goals.
The organised_Crime_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Internet Influences Communication' Causal relation: {Internet} → hasInfluence → {Organised_Crime} Semantical explanation of organised_Crime_ID000001: Organised crime refers to the work of a group or network of individuals who engage in illegal activities on an ongoing basis, often regulating relations between various criminal enterprises involved in areas such as the smuggling and sale of drugs, prostitution, gambling, extortion, and other illicit activities for profit. These groups typically have a hierarchical structure, rules of conduct, and may use violence, corruption, and intimidation to maintain their power and control over their criminal operations. Organised crime can have significant social and economic consequences, undermining legitimate businesses, corrupting public officials, and contributing to violence and instability in communities.
The outsourcing_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Inequality and Migration' Causal relation: {Economic_System, Outsourcing} → causallyInfluencedBy → {Migration, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of outsourcing_ID000001: Outsourcing is the business practice of contracting out a company's work tasks, functions, or processes to external third-party providers or service providers, which were previously carried out internally by the company's own employees. Companies may choose to outsource for various reasons, such as to reduce costs, improve efficiency, access specialised skills or technologies, or focus on their core business activities. Outsourcing can involve a wide range of functions, including manufacturing, information technology services, customer support, human resources, and accounting. While it can offer benefits to companies, outsourcing can also have implications for the company's employees, potentially leading to job losses or changes in working conditions, and can also raise ethical considerations related to labor practices and quality control in the outsourced operations.
The outsourcing_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Post-Fordist Production and Employment Flexibility' Causal relation: {Post-Fordism, Flexible_Production} → influencesHistorically → {Job_Insecurity, Outsourcing} Semantical explanation of outsourcing_ID000002: Outsourcing is the business practice of contracting out a company's work tasks, functions, or processes to external third-party providers or service providers, which were previously carried out internally by the company's own employees. Companies may choose to outsource for various reasons, such as to reduce costs, improve efficiency, access specialised skills or technologies, or focus on their core business activities. Outsourcing can involve a wide range of functions, including manufacturing, information technology services, customer support, human resources, and accounting. While it can offer benefits to companies, outsourcing can also have implications for the company's employees, potentially leading to job losses or changes in working conditions, and can also raise ethical considerations related to labor practices and quality control in the outsourced operations.
The participant_Observation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Ethnographic Research Methods' Causal relation: {Ethnography, Participant_Observation} → observes → {Qualitative_Research, Cultural_Relativism} Semantical explanation of participant_Observation_ID000001: Participant observation is a key method of research widely used in sociology and anthropology, particularly in ethnographic studies, in which the researcher takes part in the activities, routines, and daily life of a group or community being studied over an extended period of time, while also systematically observing their behaviour and interactions in their natural setting. The goal of participant observation is to gain an in-depth understanding of the group's culture, perspectives, and social world from an insider's point of view, by immersing oneself in their environment and experiencing life as they do. This method allows researchers to gather rich, qualitative data about social processes, meanings, and practices that may not be accessible through other research techniques like surveys or interviews alone.
The participant_Observation_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Participant Observation Research' Causal relation: {Participant_Observation, Ethnography} → observes → {Observation, Qualitative_Research} Semantical explanation of participant_Observation_ID000002: Participant observation is a key method of research widely used in sociology and anthropology, particularly in ethnographic studies, in which the researcher takes part in the activities, routines, and daily life of a group or community being studied over an extended period of time, while also systematically observing their behaviour and interactions in their natural setting. The goal of participant observation is to gain an in-depth understanding of the group's culture, perspectives, and social world from an insider's point of view, by immersing oneself in their environment and experiencing life as they do. This method allows researchers to gather rich, qualitative data about social processes, meanings, and practices that may not be accessible through other research techniques like surveys or interviews alone.
The participatory_Democracy_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Political Representation Process' Causal relation: {Representative_Democracy, Political_System} → represents → {Democracy, Participatory_Democracy} Semantical explanation of participatory_Democracy_ID000001: Participatory democracy is a system of democracy that emphasises the broad participation of all members of a group or community in the collective taking of major decisions that affect their lives, rather than relying solely on elected representatives to make decisions on their behalf. This form of democracy seeks to maximise citizen involvement in political and social decision-making processes, often through direct participation in forums, assemblies, or other mechanisms that allow for collective deliberation and action. The aim of participatory democracy is to empower individuals and communities to have a greater say in shaping their own futures and to promote a more inclusive and responsive form of governance.
The patriarchy_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Gender Employment Discrimination' Causal relation: {Gender_Inequality, Patriarchy} → discriminatesAgainst → {Gender_Stratification, Working_Class} Semantical explanation of patriarchy_ID000001: Patriarchy is a form of social organisation in which men hold the primary power and predominate in roles of political leadership, moral authority, social privilege, and control of property, and in the domain of the family where fathers or father figures hold authority over women and children. This system often involves the oppression and exploitation of women, who typically have less access to resources and decision-making processes. Patriarchal structures are prevalent in many societies throughout history and continue to shape gender relations and social inequalities in various ways, influencing laws, customs, and cultural norms that often favour men and limit the opportunities and autonomy of women.
The patriarchy_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Gender Stratification and Social Inequality' Causal relation: {Gender_Stratification, Patriarchy} → stratifies → {Gender_Inequality, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of patriarchy_ID000002: Patriarchy is a form of social organisation in which men hold the primary power and predominate in roles of political leadership, moral authority, social privilege, and control of property, and in the domain of the family where fathers or father figures hold authority over women and children. This system often involves the oppression and exploitation of women, who typically have less access to resources and decision-making processes. Patriarchal structures are prevalent in many societies throughout history and continue to shape gender relations and social inequalities in various ways, influencing laws, customs, and cultural norms that often favour men and limit the opportunities and autonomy of women.
The patriarchy_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Patriarchal Authority Relations' Causal relation: {Patriarchy, Gender_Order} → subordinatedTo → {Authority, Gender_Role} Semantical explanation of patriarchy_ID000003: Patriarchy is a form of social organisation in which men hold the primary power and predominate in roles of political leadership, moral authority, social privilege, and control of property, and in the domain of the family where fathers or father figures hold authority over women and children. This system often involves the oppression and exploitation of women, who typically have less access to resources and decision-making processes. Patriarchal structures are prevalent in many societies throughout history and continue to shape gender relations and social inequalities in various ways, influencing laws, customs, and cultural norms that often favour men and limit the opportunities and autonomy of women.
The patriarchy_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Patriarchal Systems and Gender Stratification' Causal relation: {Patriarchy, Gender_Role} → stratifies → {Gender_Inequality, Gender_Stratification} Semantical explanation of patriarchy_ID000004: Patriarchy is a form of social organisation in which men hold the primary power and predominate in roles of political leadership, moral authority, social privilege, and control of property, and in the domain of the family where fathers or father figures hold authority over women and children. This system often involves the oppression and exploitation of women, who typically have less access to resources and decision-making processes. Patriarchal structures are prevalent in many societies throughout history and continue to shape gender relations and social inequalities in various ways, influencing laws, customs, and cultural norms that often favour men and limit the opportunities and autonomy of women.
The peer_Group_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media and Youth Cultural Influence' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Peer_Group, Youth_Culture} → hasInfluence → {Fashion, Culture} Semantical explanation of peer_Group_ID000001: A peer group is a social group whose members share common characteristics such as similar interests, social position, age, and often a sense of shared identity and belonging. Peer groups play a significant role in the socialisation process, particularly during adolescence, influencing individuals' attitudes, values, behaviours, and self-concept. They provide a context for learning social skills, developing relationships, and establishing norms and expectations that may differ from those of the family or broader society. Peer influence can be strong, shaping choices related to fashion, music, activities, and even academic performance. Peer groups can provide social support and a sense of community, but they can also exert pressure to conform to group norms, sometimes in ways that may be positive or negative for the individual.
The peer_Group_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Peer Group Socialisation and Identity Formation' Causal relation: {Peer_Group, Social_Network} → socialises → {Identity, Socialisation} Semantical explanation of peer_Group_ID000002: A peer group is a social group whose members share common characteristics such as similar interests, social position, age, and often a sense of shared identity and belonging. Peer groups play a significant role in the socialisation process, particularly during adolescence, influencing individuals' attitudes, values, behaviours, and self-concept. They provide a context for learning social skills, developing relationships, and establishing norms and expectations that may differ from those of the family or broader society. Peer influence can be strong, shaping choices related to fashion, music, activities, and even academic performance. Peer groups can provide social support and a sense of community, but they can also exert pressure to conform to group norms, sometimes in ways that may be positive or negative for the individual.
The peer_Group_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Peer Group Socialises Youth' Causal relation: {Peer_Group} → socialises → {Socialisation} Semantical explanation of peer_Group_ID000003: A peer group is a social group whose members share common characteristics such as similar interests, social position, age, and often a sense of shared identity and belonging. Peer groups play a significant role in the socialisation process, particularly during adolescence, influencing individuals' attitudes, values, behaviours, and self-concept. They provide a context for learning social skills, developing relationships, and establishing norms and expectations that may differ from those of the family or broader society. Peer influence can be strong, shaping choices related to fashion, music, activities, and even academic performance. Peer groups can provide social support and a sense of community, but they can also exert pressure to conform to group norms, sometimes in ways that may be positive or negative for the individual.
The peer_Group_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Network Formation' Causal relation: {Social_Network, Internet} → networks → {Social_Interaction, Peer_Group} Semantical explanation of peer_Group_ID000004: A peer group is a social group whose members share common characteristics such as similar interests, social position, age, and often a sense of shared identity and belonging. Peer groups play a significant role in the socialisation process, particularly during adolescence, influencing individuals' attitudes, values, behaviours, and self-concept. They provide a context for learning social skills, developing relationships, and establishing norms and expectations that may differ from those of the family or broader society. Peer influence can be strong, shaping choices related to fashion, music, activities, and even academic performance. Peer groups can provide social support and a sense of community, but they can also exert pressure to conform to group norms, sometimes in ways that may be positive or negative for the individual.
The peripheral_Country_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'World System Economic Integration' Causal relation: {World_System, Multinational_Corporation} → controls → {Core_Country, Peripheral_Country} Semantical explanation of peripheral_Country_ID000001: Peripheral countries, according to world-systems theory developed by Immanuel Wallerstein, are those countries that have a marginal and often subordinate role in the global economy and are thus dependent on the core-producing (wealthy, industrialised) societies for their trading relationships, often serving as sources of raw materials, cheap labor, and markets for core countries' products. These countries typically have less diversified economies, weaker state institutions, and lower levels of industrialisation and technological development compared to core and semi-peripheral nations. The economic relationships between core and peripheral countries are often characterised by unequal exchange, where peripheral nations may be exploited for their resources and labor, hindering their own economic development and perpetuating global inequalities.
The political_Ideologies_And_Movement_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media Agenda Setting' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Media_And_Communication} → influencesHistorically → {Political_Ideologies_And_Movement, Political_System} Semantical explanation of political_Ideologies_And_Movement_ID000001: Political_Ideologies_And_Movement represents organised belief systems, value frameworks, and collective action initiatives that seek to shape political discourse, influence policy outcomes, and transform social and economic arrangements. This category encompasses both systematic ideological frameworks that provide comprehensive worldviews and organised movements that mobilise collective action around specific goals or grievances. These entities function as realizable potentials that can be activated under appropriate social and political conditions, manifesting in political campaigns, policy reforms, institutional changes, and social transformation. Ideological frameworks provide coherent sets of beliefs about how society should be organised, the proper role of government, and the relationship between individual freedom and collective welfare. Social movements represent organised efforts to challenge existing power structures, advocate for marginalised groups, or promote alternative visions of social organisation. The category recognises that political change emerges from the dynamic interaction between ideas and organised action, with movements serving as vehicles for translating ideological commitments into concrete political outcomes and policy changes.
The political_System_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Democratic Political Governance' Causal relation: {Democracy, Representative_Democracy} → governs → {Political_System, Nation_State} Semantical explanation of political_System_ID000001: A political system is the social institution within a society that relies on a recognised set of procedures and structures for implementing and achieving the collective goals of a group or society, particularly those related to power, authority, and governance. It encompasses the government, political parties, interest groups, and the broader political culture, including the norms, values, and beliefs that shape political behaviour and decision-making processes. The political system is responsible for making and enforcing rules, resolving conflicts, and allocating resources within a society.
The political_System_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Elite Power and Institutional Control' Causal relation: {Elite_Model, Power_Elite} → controls → {Political_System, Mass_Media} Semantical explanation of political_System_ID000002: A political system is the social institution within a society that relies on a recognised set of procedures and structures for implementing and achieving the collective goals of a group or society, particularly those related to power, authority, and governance. It encompasses the government, political parties, interest groups, and the broader political culture, including the norms, values, and beliefs that shape political behaviour and decision-making processes. The political system is responsible for making and enforcing rules, resolving conflicts, and allocating resources within a society.
The political_System_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Interest Group Political Advocacy' Causal relation: {Interest_Group, Political_Action_Committee_(PAC)} → advocates → {Political_System, Democracy} Semantical explanation of political_System_ID000003: A political system is the social institution within a society that relies on a recognised set of procedures and structures for implementing and achieving the collective goals of a group or society, particularly those related to power, authority, and governance. It encompasses the government, political parties, interest groups, and the broader political culture, including the norms, values, and beliefs that shape political behaviour and decision-making processes. The political system is responsible for making and enforcing rules, resolving conflicts, and allocating resources within a society.
The political_System_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media Agenda Setting' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Media_And_Communication} → influencesHistorically → {Political_Ideologies_And_Movement, Political_System} Semantical explanation of political_System_ID000004: A political system is the social institution within a society that relies on a recognised set of procedures and structures for implementing and achieving the collective goals of a group or society, particularly those related to power, authority, and governance. It encompasses the government, political parties, interest groups, and the broader political culture, including the norms, values, and beliefs that shape political behaviour and decision-making processes. The political system is responsible for making and enforcing rules, resolving conflicts, and allocating resources within a society.
The political_System_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Political Mobilisation and Democratic Participation' Causal relation: {Interest_Group, Political_System} → mobilises → {Democracy, Politics} Semantical explanation of political_System_ID000005: A political system is the social institution within a society that relies on a recognised set of procedures and structures for implementing and achieving the collective goals of a group or society, particularly those related to power, authority, and governance. It encompasses the government, political parties, interest groups, and the broader political culture, including the norms, values, and beliefs that shape political behaviour and decision-making processes. The political system is responsible for making and enforcing rules, resolving conflicts, and allocating resources within a society.
The political_System_ID000006 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Political Representation Process' Causal relation: {Representative_Democracy, Political_System} → represents → {Democracy, Participatory_Democracy} Semantical explanation of political_System_ID000006: A political system is the social institution within a society that relies on a recognised set of procedures and structures for implementing and achieving the collective goals of a group or society, particularly those related to power, authority, and governance. It encompasses the government, political parties, interest groups, and the broader political culture, including the norms, values, and beliefs that shape political behaviour and decision-making processes. The political system is responsible for making and enforcing rules, resolving conflicts, and allocating resources within a society.
The political_System_ID000007 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Movement Political Impact' Causal relation: {Social_Movement, New_Social_Movement} → hasInfluence → {Political_System, Democracy} Semantical explanation of political_System_ID000007: A political system is the social institution within a society that relies on a recognised set of procedures and structures for implementing and achieving the collective goals of a group or society, particularly those related to power, authority, and governance. It encompasses the government, political parties, interest groups, and the broader political culture, including the norms, values, and beliefs that shape political behaviour and decision-making processes. The political system is responsible for making and enforcing rules, resolving conflicts, and allocating resources within a society.
The political_System_ID000008 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Movements and Political Challenge' Causal relation: {Social_Movement, Resource_Mobilisation} → protests → {Political_System, Government} Semantical explanation of political_System_ID000008: A political system is the social institution within a society that relies on a recognised set of procedures and structures for implementing and achieving the collective goals of a group or society, particularly those related to power, authority, and governance. It encompasses the government, political parties, interest groups, and the broader political culture, including the norms, values, and beliefs that shape political behaviour and decision-making processes. The political system is responsible for making and enforcing rules, resolving conflicts, and allocating resources within a society.
The political_Systems_And_Governance_Form_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Politics Influence Organisations' Causal relation: {Political_Systems_And_Governance_Form} → bureaucratises → {Formal_Organisation} Semantical explanation of political_Systems_And_Governance_Form_ID000001: Political_Systems_And_Governance_Form encompasses the fundamental organisational structures and institutional arrangements through which political authority is exercised, legitimated, and maintained within societies. This category represents the core architectural frameworks that define how power is distributed, exercised, and constrained in political communities. These systems establish the basic rules and procedures for collective decision-making, the selection of leaders, and the relationship between governing institutions and citizens. The category includes both democratic forms that emphasise popular participation and consent, as well as traditional forms like monarchies that derive legitimacy from historical precedent and hereditary succession. Each system embodies different principles regarding the source of political authority, the mechanisms of accountability, and the balance between individual rights and collective governance. These governance forms represent realizable entities that can be instantiated in different societies and historical contexts, each carrying specific potentials for political participation, representation, and the exercise of state power. The category captures the diversity of ways human societies have organised political authority while recognizing common patterns in institutional design and legitimation.
The politics_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Collective Political Resistance' Causal relation: {Social_Movement, Labour_Union} → protests → {Politics, Social_Change} Semantical explanation of politics_ID000001: Politics, in Harold D. Lasswell's classic definition, is fundamentally about "who gets what, when, and how," highlighting the struggle for power and resources within a society and the processes through which decisions are made about their distribution and allocation. It involves the exercise of power and influence to shape policies, make collective decisions, and resolve conflicts over competing interests and values. Politics operates at various levels, from interpersonal relationships and small groups to national and international arenas, and is a central aspect of social organisation and governance.
The politics_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Democracy and Civic Participation' Causal relation: {Democracy, Politics} → influencesHistorically → {Social_Movement, Collective_Behaviour} Semantical explanation of politics_ID000002: Politics, in Harold D. Lasswell's classic definition, is fundamentally about "who gets what, when, and how," highlighting the struggle for power and resources within a society and the processes through which decisions are made about their distribution and allocation. It involves the exercise of power and influence to shape policies, make collective decisions, and resolve conflicts over competing interests and values. Politics operates at various levels, from interpersonal relationships and small groups to national and international arenas, and is a central aspect of social organisation and governance.
The politics_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Democratic Political Participation' Causal relation: {Democracy, Liberal_Democracy} → participatesIn → {Politics, Representative_Democracy} Semantical explanation of politics_ID000003: Politics, in Harold D. Lasswell's classic definition, is fundamentally about "who gets what, when, and how," highlighting the struggle for power and resources within a society and the processes through which decisions are made about their distribution and allocation. It involves the exercise of power and influence to shape policies, make collective decisions, and resolve conflicts over competing interests and values. Politics operates at various levels, from interpersonal relationships and small groups to national and international arenas, and is a central aspect of social organisation and governance.
The politics_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Interest Group Mobilises Support' Causal relation: {Interest_Group} → mobilises → {Politics} Semantical explanation of politics_ID000004: Politics, in Harold D. Lasswell's classic definition, is fundamentally about "who gets what, when, and how," highlighting the struggle for power and resources within a society and the processes through which decisions are made about their distribution and allocation. It involves the exercise of power and influence to shape policies, make collective decisions, and resolve conflicts over competing interests and values. Politics operates at various levels, from interpersonal relationships and small groups to national and international arenas, and is a central aspect of social organisation and governance.
The politics_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media Influence and Public Opinion' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Media_Text} → hasInfluence → {Public_Sphere, Politics} Semantical explanation of politics_ID000005: Politics, in Harold D. Lasswell's classic definition, is fundamentally about "who gets what, when, and how," highlighting the struggle for power and resources within a society and the processes through which decisions are made about their distribution and allocation. It involves the exercise of power and influence to shape policies, make collective decisions, and resolve conflicts over competing interests and values. Politics operates at various levels, from interpersonal relationships and small groups to national and international arenas, and is a central aspect of social organisation and governance.
The politics_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Nationalism and State Formation' Causal relation: {Nation_State, Nationalism} → socialises → {Politics, Identity} Semantical explanation of politics_ID000006: Politics, in Harold D. Lasswell's classic definition, is fundamentally about "who gets what, when, and how," highlighting the struggle for power and resources within a society and the processes through which decisions are made about their distribution and allocation. It involves the exercise of power and influence to shape policies, make collective decisions, and resolve conflicts over competing interests and values. Politics operates at various levels, from interpersonal relationships and small groups to national and international arenas, and is a central aspect of social organisation and governance.
The politics_ID000007 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Political Mobilisation and Democratic Participation' Causal relation: {Interest_Group, Political_System} → mobilises → {Democracy, Politics} Semantical explanation of politics_ID000007: Politics, in Harold D. Lasswell's classic definition, is fundamentally about "who gets what, when, and how," highlighting the struggle for power and resources within a society and the processes through which decisions are made about their distribution and allocation. It involves the exercise of power and influence to shape policies, make collective decisions, and resolve conflicts over competing interests and values. Politics operates at various levels, from interpersonal relationships and small groups to national and international arenas, and is a central aspect of social organisation and governance.
The politics_ID000008 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Political Resource Mobilisation' Causal relation: {Political_Action_Committee_(PAC), Interest_Group} → mobilises → {Resource_Mobilisation, Politics} Semantical explanation of politics_ID000008: Politics, in Harold D. Lasswell's classic definition, is fundamentally about "who gets what, when, and how," highlighting the struggle for power and resources within a society and the processes through which decisions are made about their distribution and allocation. It involves the exercise of power and influence to shape policies, make collective decisions, and resolve conflicts over competing interests and values. Politics operates at various levels, from interpersonal relationships and small groups to national and international arenas, and is a central aspect of social organisation and governance.
The politics_ID000009 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Movements and Collective Action' Causal relation: {Social_Movement, Collective_Behaviour} → mobilises → {Politics, Social_Change} Semantical explanation of politics_ID000009: Politics, in Harold D. Lasswell's classic definition, is fundamentally about "who gets what, when, and how," highlighting the struggle for power and resources within a society and the processes through which decisions are made about their distribution and allocation. It involves the exercise of power and influence to shape policies, make collective decisions, and resolve conflicts over competing interests and values. Politics operates at various levels, from interpersonal relationships and small groups to national and international arenas, and is a central aspect of social organisation and governance.
The population_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Migration and Urban Diversity' Causal relation: {Migration, Population} → influencesHistorically → {Urbanism, Cultural_Diversity} Semantical explanation of population_ID000001: In the context of social research, the population refers to the entire group of people who are the focus of a study or survey and about whom the researcher wants to draw conclusions. The population can be defined by specific characteristics, such as age, gender, ethnicity, geographic location, or membership in a particular group. Due to practical constraints, researchers often study a smaller subset of the population, known as a sample, and then generalise their findings from the sample back to the larger population, provided that the sample is representative of the population as a whole. Defining the target population clearly is a crucial step in the research design process.
The post-Fordism_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Post-Fordist Production and Employment Flexibility' Causal relation: {Post-Fordism, Flexible_Production} → influencesHistorically → {Job_Insecurity, Outsourcing} Semantical explanation of post-Fordism_ID000001: Post-Fordism is a general term used to describe the transition from mass industrial production, which was characterised by Fordist methods of standardised production, assembly lines, and economies of scale, to more flexible and diversified forms of production that favour innovation, cater to niche markets, and are aimed at meeting increasingly differentiated market demands for customised and higher-quality products. This shift, which began in the late 20th century, is associated with advancements in technology, such as automation and computerisation, as well as changes in consumer preferences and global economic competition. Post-Fordist production systems often involve greater flexibility in production processes, the use of advanced technologies to allow for product variation, a more skilled and adaptable workforce, and a focus on quality and innovation rather than just mass quantity.
The postindustrial_City_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Industrial Urban Development' Causal relation: {Industrial_City, Industrialism} → urbanises → {Urban_Ecology, Postindustrial_City} Semantical explanation of postindustrial_City_ID000001: A postindustrial city is an urban center in which the economy is dominated by global finance, the electronic flow of information, technology, services, and consumption, rather than traditional manufacturing and industrial activities. These cities often serve as hubs for financial institutions, corporate headquarters, research and development, and high-technology industries, playing a central role in the global knowledge economy. The landscape and social structure of postindustrial cities may reflect this shift, with a decline in industrial areas and a growth in office buildings, service-oriented businesses, and residential areas catering to a more diverse and often highly skilled workforce.
The poverty_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Gentrification and Residential Displacement' Causal relation: {Gentrification, Urban_Renewal} → excludes → {Working_Class, Poverty} Semantical explanation of poverty_ID000001: Poverty refers to a state of deprivation where individuals or families lack the sufficient financial resources or material possessions to meet their basic needs or maintain a living standard considered customary in their society. This broad category encompasses various forms, most commonly distinguished as absolute poverty and relative poverty. Absolute poverty, also known as subsistence poverty, defines a condition where individuals lack the minimal resources required for basic survival, such as food, shelter, warmth, and safety, often measured by a fixed income threshold. Relative poverty, conversely, defines deprivation in relation to the living standards and average income levels of the majority within a particular society, implying social exclusion and a reduced ability to participate fully in customary activities. The feminisation of poverty highlights the increasing proportion of women among the poor. Poverty is a complex social problem influenced by economic systems, social inequalities, access to resources, and various structural and individual factors, leading to significant social and health consequences.
The poverty_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Poverty and Social Disadvantage' Causal relation: {Poverty, Underdevelopment} → causallyInfluencedBy → {Crime, Health} Semantical explanation of poverty_ID000002: Poverty refers to a state of deprivation where individuals or families lack the sufficient financial resources or material possessions to meet their basic needs or maintain a living standard considered customary in their society. This broad category encompasses various forms, most commonly distinguished as absolute poverty and relative poverty. Absolute poverty, also known as subsistence poverty, defines a condition where individuals lack the minimal resources required for basic survival, such as food, shelter, warmth, and safety, often measured by a fixed income threshold. Relative poverty, conversely, defines deprivation in relation to the living standards and average income levels of the majority within a particular society, implying social exclusion and a reduced ability to participate fully in customary activities. The feminisation of poverty highlights the increasing proportion of women among the poor. Poverty is a complex social problem influenced by economic systems, social inequalities, access to resources, and various structural and individual factors, leading to significant social and health consequences.
The poverty_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'State Welfare and Social Redistribution' Causal relation: {State, Healthcare} → provides → {Social_Inequality, Poverty} Semantical explanation of poverty_ID000003: Poverty refers to a state of deprivation where individuals or families lack the sufficient financial resources or material possessions to meet their basic needs or maintain a living standard considered customary in their society. This broad category encompasses various forms, most commonly distinguished as absolute poverty and relative poverty. Absolute poverty, also known as subsistence poverty, defines a condition where individuals lack the minimal resources required for basic survival, such as food, shelter, warmth, and safety, often measured by a fixed income threshold. Relative poverty, conversely, defines deprivation in relation to the living standards and average income levels of the majority within a particular society, implying social exclusion and a reduced ability to participate fully in customary activities. The feminisation of poverty highlights the increasing proportion of women among the poor. Poverty is a complex social problem influenced by economic systems, social inequalities, access to resources, and various structural and individual factors, leading to significant social and health consequences.
The power_Elite_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Hegemony Establishment' Causal relation: {Hegemony, Power_Elite} → controls → {Culture, Mass_Media} Semantical explanation of power_Elite_ID000001: Power elite is a term popularised by sociologist C. Wright Mills to describe a relatively small, tightly knit group of individuals who occupy the top positions in the dominant institutions of American society—namely, the military, the industrial (corporate) sector, and the government—and who collectively hold the most power and make key decisions that shape the fate of the United States. According to Mills, these elites share similar backgrounds, interests, and worldviews, and their decisions have far-reaching consequences for the rest of the population, often operating outside of traditional democratic processes and accountability. The theory of the power elite suggests that power in modern industrial societies is concentrated rather than widely dispersed.
The power_Elite_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Elite Power and Institutional Control' Causal relation: {Elite_Model, Power_Elite} → controls → {Political_System, Mass_Media} Semantical explanation of power_Elite_ID000002: Power elite is a term popularised by sociologist C. Wright Mills to describe a relatively small, tightly knit group of individuals who occupy the top positions in the dominant institutions of American society—namely, the military, the industrial (corporate) sector, and the government—and who collectively hold the most power and make key decisions that shape the fate of the United States. According to Mills, these elites share similar backgrounds, interests, and worldviews, and their decisions have far-reaching consequences for the rest of the population, often operating outside of traditional democratic processes and accountability. The theory of the power elite suggests that power in modern industrial societies is concentrated rather than widely dispersed.
The power_Elite_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media Information Control' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Power_Elite} → controls → {Public_Sphere, Hegemony} Semantical explanation of power_Elite_ID000003: Power elite is a term popularised by sociologist C. Wright Mills to describe a relatively small, tightly knit group of individuals who occupy the top positions in the dominant institutions of American society—namely, the military, the industrial (corporate) sector, and the government—and who collectively hold the most power and make key decisions that shape the fate of the United States. According to Mills, these elites share similar backgrounds, interests, and worldviews, and their decisions have far-reaching consequences for the rest of the population, often operating outside of traditional democratic processes and accountability. The theory of the power elite suggests that power in modern industrial societies is concentrated rather than widely dispersed.
The power_Elite_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Power Elite Mobilises Development' Causal relation: {Power_Elite} → mobilises → {Social_Change} Semantical explanation of power_Elite_ID000004: Power elite is a term popularised by sociologist C. Wright Mills to describe a relatively small, tightly knit group of individuals who occupy the top positions in the dominant institutions of American society—namely, the military, the industrial (corporate) sector, and the government—and who collectively hold the most power and make key decisions that shape the fate of the United States. According to Mills, these elites share similar backgrounds, interests, and worldviews, and their decisions have far-reaching consequences for the rest of the population, often operating outside of traditional democratic processes and accountability. The theory of the power elite suggests that power in modern industrial societies is concentrated rather than widely dispersed.
The power_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Authority and Social Legitimacy' Causal relation: {Authority, Legitimacy} → legitimises → {Power, Value} Semantical explanation of power_ID000001: Power, in its most fundamental sociological sense, is the ability of an individual or group to exercise their will over others, even in the face of resistance, and to bring about desired outcomes or to prevent undesired ones. Power can manifest in various forms, including political power, economic power, social power, and cultural power, and it can be based on different sources such as authority, force, influence, or control over resources. The study of power is central to sociology, as it underlies social inequalities, shapes social interactions, and drives social change. Sociologists analyse how power is distributed, how it is used and contested, and its impact on individuals, groups, and social structures.
The power_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Authority Legitimation Processes' Causal relation: {Legal-rational_Authority, Traditional_Authority} → regulates → {Legitimacy, Power} Semantical explanation of power_ID000002: Power, in its most fundamental sociological sense, is the ability of an individual or group to exercise their will over others, even in the face of resistance, and to bring about desired outcomes or to prevent undesired ones. Power can manifest in various forms, including political power, economic power, social power, and cultural power, and it can be based on different sources such as authority, force, influence, or control over resources. The study of power is central to sociology, as it underlies social inequalities, shapes social interactions, and drives social change. Sociologists analyse how power is distributed, how it is used and contested, and its impact on individuals, groups, and social structures.
The power_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Authority Legitimises Power' Causal relation: {Authority} → legitimises → {Power} Semantical explanation of power_ID000003: Power, in its most fundamental sociological sense, is the ability of an individual or group to exercise their will over others, even in the face of resistance, and to bring about desired outcomes or to prevent undesired ones. Power can manifest in various forms, including political power, economic power, social power, and cultural power, and it can be based on different sources such as authority, force, influence, or control over resources. The study of power is central to sociology, as it underlies social inequalities, shapes social interactions, and drives social change. Sociologists analyse how power is distributed, how it is used and contested, and its impact on individuals, groups, and social structures.
The power_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Power and Political Control' Causal relation: {Power, Authority} → controls → {Government, Social_Control} Semantical explanation of power_ID000004: Power, in its most fundamental sociological sense, is the ability of an individual or group to exercise their will over others, even in the face of resistance, and to bring about desired outcomes or to prevent undesired ones. Power can manifest in various forms, including political power, economic power, social power, and cultural power, and it can be based on different sources such as authority, force, influence, or control over resources. The study of power is central to sociology, as it underlies social inequalities, shapes social interactions, and drives social change. Sociologists analyse how power is distributed, how it is used and contested, and its impact on individuals, groups, and social structures.
The prestige_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Status Group Competition' Causal relation: {Status_Group, Ethnic_Group} → competesWith → {Prestige, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of prestige_ID000001: Prestige in sociology refers to the level of respect, admiration, and social honor that an occupation or social position holds within a society. Different occupations are typically ranked differently in terms of prestige based on factors such as the perceived importance of the work, the level of education or skill required, the income associated with the occupation, and the social status of those who typically hold the position. High-prestige occupations often command more respect and social standing, which can influence individuals' social interactions, opportunities, and overall position within the social hierarchy. Sociologists often study occupational prestige to understand how societies value different types of work and how these valuations contribute to social stratification.
The primary_Group_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Primary Group Social Interaction' Causal relation: {Primary_Group, Small_Group} → communicatesWith → {Social_Interaction, Dyad} Semantical explanation of primary_Group_ID000001: A primary group is a small social group characterised by intimate, face-to-face association and cooperation among its members, fostering close, personal, and often emotional relationships. These groups, such as family members, close friends, or a tightly knit group of peers, are typically characterised by a strong sense of belonging, mutual support, and shared activities and experiences. Interactions within primary groups are often informal, spontaneous, and deeply personal, playing a crucial role in the socialisation process, the development of self-identity, and the provision of emotional well-being for their members.
The primary_Socialisation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Intergenerational Cultural Transmission' Causal relation: {Primary_Socialisation, Family} → transmits → {Cultural_Transmission, Value} Semantical explanation of primary_Socialisation_ID000001: Primary socialisation is the fundamental process by which children learn the basic cultural norms, values, beliefs, language, and behaviours of the society into which they are born, primarily occurring within the family and close-knit social environments during their early years. Through interaction with primary caregivers and other close family members, children develop their initial sense of self, learn how to communicate, and internalise the foundational norms and expectations of their culture, which are essential for functioning within that society. This stage of socialisation lays the groundwork for future learning and social development.
The primary_Socialisation_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Primary Socialisation and Identity Formation' Causal relation: {Primary_Socialisation, Family, Education} → socialises → {Identity, Value, Social_Role} Semantical explanation of primary_Socialisation_ID000002: Primary socialisation is the fundamental process by which children learn the basic cultural norms, values, beliefs, language, and behaviours of the society into which they are born, primarily occurring within the family and close-knit social environments during their early years. Through interaction with primary caregivers and other close family members, children develop their initial sense of self, learn how to communicate, and internalise the foundational norms and expectations of their culture, which are essential for functioning within that society. This stage of socialisation lays the groundwork for future learning and social development.
The primary_Socialisation_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Primary Socialisation Processes' Causal relation: {Nuclear_Family, Extended_Family} → socialises → {Primary_Socialisation, Secondary_Socialisation} Semantical explanation of primary_Socialisation_ID000003: Primary socialisation is the fundamental process by which children learn the basic cultural norms, values, beliefs, language, and behaviours of the society into which they are born, primarily occurring within the family and close-knit social environments during their early years. Through interaction with primary caregivers and other close family members, children develop their initial sense of self, learn how to communicate, and internalise the foundational norms and expectations of their culture, which are essential for functioning within that society. This stage of socialisation lays the groundwork for future learning and social development.
The professional_Criminal_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Professional Network Formation' Causal relation: {Professional_Criminal, Entrepreneur} → networks → {Social_Network, Social_Cohesion} Semantical explanation of professional_Criminal_ID000001: A professional criminal is a person who pursues criminal activity as their primary day-to-day occupation and source of income, developing specialised skills, techniques, and a certain level of status and recognition within the criminal underworld. Unlike amateur or occasional offenders, professional criminals often plan their crimes carefully, work in organised groups or networks, and may have a long-term commitment to a life of crime. They often develop a code of conduct and may view their criminal activities as a career, acquiring expertise in specific types of crime such as theft, fraud, drug trafficking, or gambling.
The proletariat_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Capitalism Exploits Workers' Causal relation: {Capitalism} → exploits → {Proletariat} Semantical explanation of proletariat_ID000001: Proletariat, in the theoretical framework of Karl Marx, refers to the working class in a capitalist society who do not own the means of production (such as factories, land, and capital) and must therefore sell their labor power to the bourgeoisie (the capitalist class who own the means of production) in order to earn a living and survive. According to Marx, the proletariat is exploited by the bourgeoisie, who extract surplus value from their labor in the form of profit, leading to inherent class conflict and the potential for the proletariat to develop class consciousness and ultimately overthrow the capitalist system.
The proletariat_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Capitalist Labor Exploitation' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Mass_Production} → exploits → {Working_Class, Proletariat} Semantical explanation of proletariat_ID000002: Proletariat, in the theoretical framework of Karl Marx, refers to the working class in a capitalist society who do not own the means of production (such as factories, land, and capital) and must therefore sell their labor power to the bourgeoisie (the capitalist class who own the means of production) in order to earn a living and survive. According to Marx, the proletariat is exploited by the bourgeoisie, who extract surplus value from their labor in the form of profit, leading to inherent class conflict and the potential for the proletariat to develop class consciousness and ultimately overthrow the capitalist system.
The proletariat_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Exploitation and Class Relations' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Means_Of_Production} → exploits → {Proletariat, Bourgeoisie} Semantical explanation of proletariat_ID000003: Proletariat, in the theoretical framework of Karl Marx, refers to the working class in a capitalist society who do not own the means of production (such as factories, land, and capital) and must therefore sell their labor power to the bourgeoisie (the capitalist class who own the means of production) in order to earn a living and survive. According to Marx, the proletariat is exploited by the bourgeoisie, who extract surplus value from their labor in the form of profit, leading to inherent class conflict and the potential for the proletariat to develop class consciousness and ultimately overthrow the capitalist system.
The proletariat_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Labor Exploitation' Causal relation: {Capitalist, Bourgeoisie} → exploits → {Surplus_Value, Proletariat} Semantical explanation of proletariat_ID000004: Proletariat, in the theoretical framework of Karl Marx, refers to the working class in a capitalist society who do not own the means of production (such as factories, land, and capital) and must therefore sell their labor power to the bourgeoisie (the capitalist class who own the means of production) in order to earn a living and survive. According to Marx, the proletariat is exploited by the bourgeoisie, who extract surplus value from their labor in the form of profit, leading to inherent class conflict and the potential for the proletariat to develop class consciousness and ultimately overthrow the capitalist system.
The proletariat_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Labor Market Employment Relations' Causal relation: {Multinational_Corporation, Bureaucracy} → employs → {Working_Class, Proletariat} Semantical explanation of proletariat_ID000005: Proletariat, in the theoretical framework of Karl Marx, refers to the working class in a capitalist society who do not own the means of production (such as factories, land, and capital) and must therefore sell their labor power to the bourgeoisie (the capitalist class who own the means of production) in order to earn a living and survive. According to Marx, the proletariat is exploited by the bourgeoisie, who extract surplus value from their labor in the form of profit, leading to inherent class conflict and the potential for the proletariat to develop class consciousness and ultimately overthrow the capitalist system.
The public_Sphere_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Mass Communication Process' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Multimedia} → communicatesWith → {Public_Sphere, Media_And_Communication} Semantical explanation of public_Sphere_ID000001: The public sphere is a concept associated with the German sociologist Jürgen Habermas, referring to the arena of public debate and discussion in modern societies where individuals can come together to freely discuss and form opinions about matters of general interest and concern, ideally independent of state control or economic pressures. Habermas envisioned the public sphere as a space for rational-critical discourse, where citizens could exchange ideas, critique power structures, and participate in the formation of public opinion, which could then influence political action and policy-making. This sphere is not necessarily a physical place but rather a discursive space that can exist in various forms, such as through media, public gatherings, and online platforms, where reasoned arguments and open dialogue are central to the process of shaping collective understanding and political will. The ideal of the public sphere emphasises accessibility, inclusivity, and the free exchange of ideas among informed citizens.
The public_Sphere_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Mass Media Influences Public Sphere' Causal relation: {Mass_Media} → hasInfluence → {Public_Sphere} Semantical explanation of public_Sphere_ID000002: The public sphere is a concept associated with the German sociologist Jürgen Habermas, referring to the arena of public debate and discussion in modern societies where individuals can come together to freely discuss and form opinions about matters of general interest and concern, ideally independent of state control or economic pressures. Habermas envisioned the public sphere as a space for rational-critical discourse, where citizens could exchange ideas, critique power structures, and participate in the formation of public opinion, which could then influence political action and policy-making. This sphere is not necessarily a physical place but rather a discursive space that can exist in various forms, such as through media, public gatherings, and online platforms, where reasoned arguments and open dialogue are central to the process of shaping collective understanding and political will. The ideal of the public sphere emphasises accessibility, inclusivity, and the free exchange of ideas among informed citizens.
The public_Sphere_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media Influence and Public Opinion' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Media_Text} → hasInfluence → {Public_Sphere, Politics} Semantical explanation of public_Sphere_ID000003: The public sphere is a concept associated with the German sociologist Jürgen Habermas, referring to the arena of public debate and discussion in modern societies where individuals can come together to freely discuss and form opinions about matters of general interest and concern, ideally independent of state control or economic pressures. Habermas envisioned the public sphere as a space for rational-critical discourse, where citizens could exchange ideas, critique power structures, and participate in the formation of public opinion, which could then influence political action and policy-making. This sphere is not necessarily a physical place but rather a discursive space that can exist in various forms, such as through media, public gatherings, and online platforms, where reasoned arguments and open dialogue are central to the process of shaping collective understanding and political will. The ideal of the public sphere emphasises accessibility, inclusivity, and the free exchange of ideas among informed citizens.
The public_Sphere_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media Influence on Social Consciousness' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Internet} → hasInfluence → {Social_Consciousness_And_Theoretical_Quality, Public_Sphere} Semantical explanation of public_Sphere_ID000004: The public sphere is a concept associated with the German sociologist Jürgen Habermas, referring to the arena of public debate and discussion in modern societies where individuals can come together to freely discuss and form opinions about matters of general interest and concern, ideally independent of state control or economic pressures. Habermas envisioned the public sphere as a space for rational-critical discourse, where citizens could exchange ideas, critique power structures, and participate in the formation of public opinion, which could then influence political action and policy-making. This sphere is not necessarily a physical place but rather a discursive space that can exist in various forms, such as through media, public gatherings, and online platforms, where reasoned arguments and open dialogue are central to the process of shaping collective understanding and political will. The ideal of the public sphere emphasises accessibility, inclusivity, and the free exchange of ideas among informed citizens.
The public_Sphere_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media Information Control' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Power_Elite} → controls → {Public_Sphere, Hegemony} Semantical explanation of public_Sphere_ID000005: The public sphere is a concept associated with the German sociologist Jürgen Habermas, referring to the arena of public debate and discussion in modern societies where individuals can come together to freely discuss and form opinions about matters of general interest and concern, ideally independent of state control or economic pressures. Habermas envisioned the public sphere as a space for rational-critical discourse, where citizens could exchange ideas, critique power structures, and participate in the formation of public opinion, which could then influence political action and policy-making. This sphere is not necessarily a physical place but rather a discursive space that can exist in various forms, such as through media, public gatherings, and online platforms, where reasoned arguments and open dialogue are central to the process of shaping collective understanding and political will. The ideal of the public sphere emphasises accessibility, inclusivity, and the free exchange of ideas among informed citizens.
The push_And_Pull_Factor_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Population Migration Patterns' Causal relation: {Migration, Immigration} → migrates → {Diaspora, Push_And_Pull_Factor} Semantical explanation of push_And_Pull_Factor_ID000001: In the early study of global migration, push and pull factors were identified as the internal and external forces believed to significantly influence patterns of migration. 'Push factors' refer to the dynamics and conditions within the country of origin that compel people to leave, such as high rates of unemployment, economic hardship, war or conflict, famine or natural disasters, political persecution, or lack of opportunities. 'Pull factors' describe the features and characteristics of destination countries that attract migrants, such as a buoyant labor market with available jobs, higher wages, lower population density, a higher standard of living, better educational or healthcare opportunities, political stability, or the presence of established communities of migrants from the same origin country. While this model provides a basic framework for understanding migration decisions, contemporary migration studies recognise that the process is often more complex and influenced by a wider range of interconnected factors, including social networks, government policies, and individual agency.
The qualitative_Research_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Ethnographic Research Methods' Causal relation: {Ethnography, Participant_Observation} → observes → {Qualitative_Research, Cultural_Relativism} Semantical explanation of qualitative_Research_ID000001: Qualitative research is a research approach that primarily relies on data that is not numerical and often involves studying social phenomena in their natural settings or "in the field" rather than in controlled laboratory environments. This type of research seeks to understand the qualities, characteristics, and meanings of social phenomena through methods such as observation, interviews, and the analysis of texts or artifacts. The focus is often on exploring the depth and complexity of experiences, perspectives, and social processes, rather than on quantifying them through statistical data. Qualitative research aims to provide rich, descriptive insights into the social world and the ways in which people interpret and make sense of their experiences.
The qualitative_Research_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Participant Observation Research' Causal relation: {Participant_Observation, Ethnography} → observes → {Observation, Qualitative_Research} Semantical explanation of qualitative_Research_ID000002: Qualitative research is a research approach that primarily relies on data that is not numerical and often involves studying social phenomena in their natural settings or "in the field" rather than in controlled laboratory environments. This type of research seeks to understand the qualities, characteristics, and meanings of social phenomena through methods such as observation, interviews, and the analysis of texts or artifacts. The focus is often on exploring the depth and complexity of experiences, perspectives, and social processes, rather than on quantifying them through statistical data. Qualitative research aims to provide rich, descriptive insights into the social world and the ways in which people interpret and make sense of their experiences.
The qualitative_Research_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Qualitative Research Interviewing' Causal relation: {Interview, Biographical_Method} → interviews → {Qualitative_Research, Life_History} Semantical explanation of qualitative_Research_ID000003: Qualitative research is a research approach that primarily relies on data that is not numerical and often involves studying social phenomena in their natural settings or "in the field" rather than in controlled laboratory environments. This type of research seeks to understand the qualities, characteristics, and meanings of social phenomena through methods such as observation, interviews, and the analysis of texts or artifacts. The focus is often on exploring the depth and complexity of experiences, perspectives, and social processes, rather than on quantifying them through statistical data. Qualitative research aims to provide rich, descriptive insights into the social world and the ways in which people interpret and make sense of their experiences.
The qualitative_Research_Method_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Public Opinion Research' Causal relation: {Survey, Questionnaire} → surveys → {Qualitative_Research_Method, Quantitative_Research_Method, Representative_Sample} Semantical explanation of qualitative_Research_Method_ID000001: Qualitative research methods are those sociological methods that primarily focus on gathering in-depth, detailed, and rich data, often in non-numerical form, with the primary aim of gaining a better understanding of the social phenomena being studied from the perspectives of the individuals or groups involved. These methods often involve exploring the 'why' and 'how' of social issues rather than just the 'what' or 'how many' that quantitative methods typically address. Common qualitative research methods include in-depth interviews, focus groups, participant observation, ethnography, and the analysis of textual or visual data. The goal of qualitative research is to provide a holistic and contextual understanding of social phenomena, uncovering meanings, patterns, and experiences in a detailed and nuanced way.
The quality_Circle_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Organisational Collaborative Relations' Causal relation: {Coalition, Interest_Group} → collaboratesWith → {Resource_Mobilisation, Quality_Circle} Semantical explanation of quality_Circle_ID000001: A quality circle is a type of industrialised group production or work team, often found in manufacturing or service industries, where workers who are involved in a particular area of work come together regularly to use their collective expertise and knowledge to actively participate in problem-solving, decision-making, and continuous improvement processes related to the quality of products, services, or work processes. These circles typically involve a small group of employees who meet voluntarily and are trained in problem-solving techniques to identify, analyse, and propose solutions to work-related issues, aiming to enhance efficiency, productivity, and the quality of outcomes by leveraging the insights and experiences of those directly involved in the work.
The quantitative_Research_Method_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Public Opinion Research' Causal relation: {Survey, Questionnaire} → surveys → {Qualitative_Research_Method, Quantitative_Research_Method, Representative_Sample} Semantical explanation of quantitative_Research_Method_ID000001: Quantitative research methods are those sociological methods that primarily focus on collecting and analysing social phenomena using numerical data, mathematical models, statistical techniques, and computational methods to measure and quantify social patterns, relationships between variables, and the strength and direction of these relationships. These methods often involve the use of surveys with closed-ended questions, experiments with controlled variables, and the analysis of large datasets to identify trends, test hypotheses, and make generalisations about populations. The goal of quantitative research is often to establish statistical significance, identify causal relationships, and produce findings that can be generalised to a larger population.
The quantitative_Research_Method_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Research Data Collection' Causal relation: {Survey, Census} → surveys → {Quantitative_Research_Method, Representative_Sample} Semantical explanation of quantitative_Research_Method_ID000002: Quantitative research methods are those sociological methods that primarily focus on collecting and analysing social phenomena using numerical data, mathematical models, statistical techniques, and computational methods to measure and quantify social patterns, relationships between variables, and the strength and direction of these relationships. These methods often involve the use of surveys with closed-ended questions, experiments with controlled variables, and the analysis of large datasets to identify trends, test hypotheses, and make generalisations about populations. The goal of quantitative research is often to establish statistical significance, identify causal relationships, and produce findings that can be generalised to a larger population.
The questionnaire_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Public Opinion Research' Causal relation: {Survey, Questionnaire} → surveys → {Qualitative_Research_Method, Quantitative_Research_Method, Representative_Sample} Semantical explanation of questionnaire_ID000001: A questionnaire is a research instrument consisting of a series of written questions that a researcher supplies to subjects or respondents, typically in a written or digital format, requesting their responses to gather data on their attitudes, beliefs, behaviours, or characteristics. Questionnaires can include various types of questions, such as multiple-choice, true/false, rating scales, and open-ended questions, depending on the research objectives and the type of information being sought. They are a widely used method in survey research for collecting data from a large number of people in a standardised way, allowing for statistical analysis of the responses. The design of a questionnaire, including the wording, order, and format of questions, is crucial for obtaining accurate and reliable data.
The racial_Group_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Apartheid and Racial Segregation' Causal relation: {Apartheid, Racism} → segregates → {Racial_Group, Social_Exclusion} Semantical explanation of racial_Group_ID000001: A racial group is a category of people who are set apart from others within a society primarily because of obvious physical differences that are perceived as socially significant and are used to define group membership and often to justify differential treatment and social hierarchies. These perceived physical differences are not inherently meaningful but become socially significant when a society defines them as such and uses them as a basis for categorizing people and assigning them to different social positions, often leading to inequalities in power, privilege, and status. The concept of racial groups is closely tied to the social construction of race and the social processes of racialisation, where certain physical characteristics are imbued with social meaning and used to create racial categories that have real social consequences.
The racial_Group_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Discrimination Practices' Causal relation: {Institutional_Discrimination, Racism} → discriminatesAgainst → {Ethnic_Group, Racial_Group} Semantical explanation of racial_Group_ID000002: A racial group is a category of people who are set apart from others within a society primarily because of obvious physical differences that are perceived as socially significant and are used to define group membership and often to justify differential treatment and social hierarchies. These perceived physical differences are not inherently meaningful but become socially significant when a society defines them as such and uses them as a basis for categorizing people and assigning them to different social positions, often leading to inequalities in power, privilege, and status. The concept of racial groups is closely tied to the social construction of race and the social processes of racialisation, where certain physical characteristics are imbued with social meaning and used to create racial categories that have real social consequences.
The racism_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Apartheid and Racial Segregation' Causal relation: {Apartheid, Racism} → segregates → {Racial_Group, Social_Exclusion} Semantical explanation of racism_ID000001: Racism is the attribution of characteristics of superiority or inferiority to a population sharing certain physically inherited characteristics, often leading to prejudice, discrimination, and the belief in the inherent superiority of one race over others. It is a complex system of power and ideology that operates at individual, interpersonal, and institutional levels, based on the social construction of racial categories and the belief that these categories are biologically real and associated with distinct traits, abilities, or moral character. Racism can manifest as overt acts of discrimination and hate speech, as well as in more subtle forms of bias embedded in social structures, policies, and practices that perpetuate racial inequalities in areas such as education, employment, housing, and the criminal justice system. It is a pervasive and harmful social phenomenon with deep historical roots and lasting consequences for individuals and societies.
The racism_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Discrimination and Social Exclusion' Causal relation: {Racism, Gender_Inequality} → discriminatesAgainst → {Social_Exclusion, Minority_Group} Semantical explanation of racism_ID000002: Racism is the attribution of characteristics of superiority or inferiority to a population sharing certain physically inherited characteristics, often leading to prejudice, discrimination, and the belief in the inherent superiority of one race over others. It is a complex system of power and ideology that operates at individual, interpersonal, and institutional levels, based on the social construction of racial categories and the belief that these categories are biologically real and associated with distinct traits, abilities, or moral character. Racism can manifest as overt acts of discrimination and hate speech, as well as in more subtle forms of bias embedded in social structures, policies, and practices that perpetuate racial inequalities in areas such as education, employment, housing, and the criminal justice system. It is a pervasive and harmful social phenomenon with deep historical roots and lasting consequences for individuals and societies.
The racism_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Discrimination Practices' Causal relation: {Institutional_Discrimination, Racism} → discriminatesAgainst → {Ethnic_Group, Racial_Group} Semantical explanation of racism_ID000003: Racism is the attribution of characteristics of superiority or inferiority to a population sharing certain physically inherited characteristics, often leading to prejudice, discrimination, and the belief in the inherent superiority of one race over others. It is a complex system of power and ideology that operates at individual, interpersonal, and institutional levels, based on the social construction of racial categories and the belief that these categories are biologically real and associated with distinct traits, abilities, or moral character. Racism can manifest as overt acts of discrimination and hate speech, as well as in more subtle forms of bias embedded in social structures, policies, and practices that perpetuate racial inequalities in areas such as education, employment, housing, and the criminal justice system. It is a pervasive and harmful social phenomenon with deep historical roots and lasting consequences for individuals and societies.
The racism_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Racial Stratification and Social Hierarchy' Causal relation: {Racism, Ethnic_Group} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification, Social_Class} Semantical explanation of racism_ID000004: Racism is the attribution of characteristics of superiority or inferiority to a population sharing certain physically inherited characteristics, often leading to prejudice, discrimination, and the belief in the inherent superiority of one race over others. It is a complex system of power and ideology that operates at individual, interpersonal, and institutional levels, based on the social construction of racial categories and the belief that these categories are biologically real and associated with distinct traits, abilities, or moral character. Racism can manifest as overt acts of discrimination and hate speech, as well as in more subtle forms of bias embedded in social structures, policies, and practices that perpetuate racial inequalities in areas such as education, employment, housing, and the criminal justice system. It is a pervasive and harmful social phenomenon with deep historical roots and lasting consequences for individuals and societies.
The racism_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Racism Discriminates Against Minorities' Causal relation: {Racism} → discriminatesAgainst → {Minority_Group} Semantical explanation of racism_ID000005: Racism is the attribution of characteristics of superiority or inferiority to a population sharing certain physically inherited characteristics, often leading to prejudice, discrimination, and the belief in the inherent superiority of one race over others. It is a complex system of power and ideology that operates at individual, interpersonal, and institutional levels, based on the social construction of racial categories and the belief that these categories are biologically real and associated with distinct traits, abilities, or moral character. Racism can manifest as overt acts of discrimination and hate speech, as well as in more subtle forms of bias embedded in social structures, policies, and practices that perpetuate racial inequalities in areas such as education, employment, housing, and the criminal justice system. It is a pervasive and harmful social phenomenon with deep historical roots and lasting consequences for individuals and societies.
The rationalisation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Bureaucracy Coordinates Administration' Causal relation: {Bureaucracy} → coordinates → {Rationalisation} Semantical explanation of rationalisation_ID000001: Rationalisation is a concept extensively used by Max Weber to refer to the multifaceted process by which modes of precise calculation, efficiency-oriented organisation, and action based on abstract rules, laws, and procedures increasingly come to dominate the social world, replacing more traditional, emotional, or value-driven forms of social organisation and behaviour. This process is a central theme in Weber's analysis of modernity and is closely linked to the rise of bureaucracy, capitalism, and science. Rationalisation involves a shift towards systematic thinking, the application of reason and logic to social life, and an emphasis on predictability and control through formal structures and procedures. While it has led to advancements in technology, efficiency, and administration, Weber also cautioned about the potential negative consequences of rationalisation, such as the disenchantment of the world and the dominance of impersonal bureaucratic structures.
The rationalisation_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Bureaucratic Rationalisation' Causal relation: {Bureaucratisation, Rationalisation} → bureaucratises → {Bureaucracy, Formal_Organisation} Semantical explanation of rationalisation_ID000002: Rationalisation is a concept extensively used by Max Weber to refer to the multifaceted process by which modes of precise calculation, efficiency-oriented organisation, and action based on abstract rules, laws, and procedures increasingly come to dominate the social world, replacing more traditional, emotional, or value-driven forms of social organisation and behaviour. This process is a central theme in Weber's analysis of modernity and is closely linked to the rise of bureaucracy, capitalism, and science. Rationalisation involves a shift towards systematic thinking, the application of reason and logic to social life, and an emphasis on predictability and control through formal structures and procedures. While it has led to advancements in technology, efficiency, and administration, Weber also cautioned about the potential negative consequences of rationalisation, such as the disenchantment of the world and the dominance of impersonal bureaucratic structures.
The rationalisation_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Bureaucratisation and Social Rationalisation' Causal relation: {Bureaucracy, Rationalisation} → bureaucratises → {Alienation, Formal_Organisation} Semantical explanation of rationalisation_ID000003: Rationalisation is a concept extensively used by Max Weber to refer to the multifaceted process by which modes of precise calculation, efficiency-oriented organisation, and action based on abstract rules, laws, and procedures increasingly come to dominate the social world, replacing more traditional, emotional, or value-driven forms of social organisation and behaviour. This process is a central theme in Weber's analysis of modernity and is closely linked to the rise of bureaucracy, capitalism, and science. Rationalisation involves a shift towards systematic thinking, the application of reason and logic to social life, and an emphasis on predictability and control through formal structures and procedures. While it has led to advancements in technology, efficiency, and administration, Weber also cautioned about the potential negative consequences of rationalisation, such as the disenchantment of the world and the dominance of impersonal bureaucratic structures.
The rationalisation_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Organisational Coordination and Efficiency' Causal relation: {Organisation, Bureaucracy} → coordinates → {Structuration, Rationalisation} Semantical explanation of rationalisation_ID000004: Rationalisation is a concept extensively used by Max Weber to refer to the multifaceted process by which modes of precise calculation, efficiency-oriented organisation, and action based on abstract rules, laws, and procedures increasingly come to dominate the social world, replacing more traditional, emotional, or value-driven forms of social organisation and behaviour. This process is a central theme in Weber's analysis of modernity and is closely linked to the rise of bureaucracy, capitalism, and science. Rationalisation involves a shift towards systematic thinking, the application of reason and logic to social life, and an emphasis on predictability and control through formal structures and procedures. While it has led to advancements in technology, efficiency, and administration, Weber also cautioned about the potential negative consequences of rationalisation, such as the disenchantment of the world and the dominance of impersonal bureaucratic structures.
The rehabilitation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Criminal Justice Punishment' Causal relation: {Capital_Punishment, Formal_Social_Control} → sanctions → {Crime, Rehabilitation} Semantical explanation of rehabilitation_ID000001: Rehabilitation, in the context of criminology and sociology, refers to a planned and systematic program or process aimed at reforming an offender's attitudes, behaviours, and skills in order to reduce the likelihood of future offenses and facilitate their reintegration into society as law-abiding citizens. Rehabilitation programs can take various forms, including educational and vocational training, therapy and counseling to address underlying issues contributing to criminal behaviour (such as substance abuse or mental health problems), and restorative justice initiatives that focus on repairing the harm caused by the crime and promoting empathy and accountability. The goal of rehabilitation is to address the root causes of crime and provide offenders with the tools and support they need to lead productive and crime-free lives upon release from correctional facilities or completion of their sentences.
The rehabilitation_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Rehabilitation and Social Reintegration' Causal relation: {Rehabilitation, Capital_Punishment} → influencesHistorically → {Crime, Social_Control} Semantical explanation of rehabilitation_ID000002: Rehabilitation, in the context of criminology and sociology, refers to a planned and systematic program or process aimed at reforming an offender's attitudes, behaviours, and skills in order to reduce the likelihood of future offenses and facilitate their reintegration into society as law-abiding citizens. Rehabilitation programs can take various forms, including educational and vocational training, therapy and counseling to address underlying issues contributing to criminal behaviour (such as substance abuse or mental health problems), and restorative justice initiatives that focus on repairing the harm caused by the crime and promoting empathy and accountability. The goal of rehabilitation is to address the root causes of crime and provide offenders with the tools and support they need to lead productive and crime-free lives upon release from correctional facilities or completion of their sentences.
The relative_Deprivation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Deindustrialisation and Urban Decline' Causal relation: {Deindustrialisation, Economic_System} → influencesHistorically → {Working_Class, Relative_Deprivation} Semantical explanation of relative_Deprivation_ID000001: Relative deprivation is the thesis that people's subjective feelings of deprivation, discontent, or grievance are not absolute or based on an objective standard of poverty or need, but rather are relative to their assessment of themselves and their situation in comparison with others around them, particularly those they perceive as being more privileged or having more of what they desire. This feeling of being disadvantaged can arise even when one's basic needs are met, if one believes they are unfairly lacking in comparison to a relevant reference group or societal standards. The experience of relative deprivation can be a significant factor in social unrest, the formation of social movements, and the expression of social discontent, as people strive to achieve what they perceive as equitable or just in relation to others.
The relative_Deprivation_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Marginalisation Mechanisms' Causal relation: {Neoliberalism, Structural_Functionalism} → marginalises → {Social_Exclusion, Relative_Deprivation} Semantical explanation of relative_Deprivation_ID000002: Relative deprivation is the thesis that people's subjective feelings of deprivation, discontent, or grievance are not absolute or based on an objective standard of poverty or need, but rather are relative to their assessment of themselves and their situation in comparison with others around them, particularly those they perceive as being more privileged or having more of what they desire. This feeling of being disadvantaged can arise even when one's basic needs are met, if one believes they are unfairly lacking in comparison to a relevant reference group or societal standards. The experience of relative deprivation can be a significant factor in social unrest, the formation of social movements, and the expression of social discontent, as people strive to achieve what they perceive as equitable or just in relation to others.
The relative_Poverty_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Digital Divide and Information Inequality' Causal relation: {Internet, Relative_Poverty} → stratifies → {Social_Inequality, Education} Semantical explanation of relative_Poverty_ID000001: Relative poverty refers to a floating standard of deprivation by which people at the bottom of a society, whatever their absolute lifestyles or level of material comfort, are judged to be disadvantaged and lacking in comparison with the overall standards and average lifestyle of the nation or society as a whole. This measure of poverty is not based on a fixed threshold of basic needs but rather on the relative economic position of individuals or households within their social context. It acknowledges that what is considered a minimally acceptable standard of living can vary across different societies and change over time, and that poverty is not just about lacking the bare necessities for survival but also about being excluded from the ordinary living patterns, customs, and amenities that are considered customary in the society in which one belongs.
The religion_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Religion Socialises Believers' Causal relation: {Religion} → socialises → {Socialisation} Semantical explanation of religion_ID000001: Religion is a complex and multifaceted social institution that involves a set of beliefs adhered to by the members of a community, typically involving symbols that are regarded with a sense of awe, wonder, or the sacred, along with ritual practices in which members of the community collectively engage to express and reinforce their shared beliefs and values. It often provides a framework for understanding the world, the meaning of life, and the nature of ultimate reality, and can include a moral code, a system of ethics, and a sense of community among believers. Religious beliefs are statements or doctrines to which members of a particular religion adhere, providing a cognitive framework for their faith. Religious experience refers to the subjective feeling or perception of being in direct contact with the ultimate reality, such as a divine being, or of being overcome by intense religious emotion, often considered a powerful and transformative aspect of religious life. Religious rituals are the practices, ceremonies, and behaviours that are required or expected of members of a faith, often performed collectively and imbued with symbolic meaning, serving to reinforce beliefs, create social bonds, and connect individuals to the sacred.
The religion_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Religious Authority and Social Cohesion' Causal relation: {Religion, Traditional_Authority} → transmits → {Sacred, Social_Cohesion} Semantical explanation of religion_ID000002: Religion is a complex and multifaceted social institution that involves a set of beliefs adhered to by the members of a community, typically involving symbols that are regarded with a sense of awe, wonder, or the sacred, along with ritual practices in which members of the community collectively engage to express and reinforce their shared beliefs and values. It often provides a framework for understanding the world, the meaning of life, and the nature of ultimate reality, and can include a moral code, a system of ethics, and a sense of community among believers. Religious beliefs are statements or doctrines to which members of a particular religion adhere, providing a cognitive framework for their faith. Religious experience refers to the subjective feeling or perception of being in direct contact with the ultimate reality, such as a divine being, or of being overcome by intense religious emotion, often considered a powerful and transformative aspect of religious life. Religious rituals are the practices, ceremonies, and behaviours that are required or expected of members of a faith, often performed collectively and imbued with symbolic meaning, serving to reinforce beliefs, create social bonds, and connect individuals to the sacred.
The religion_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Religious Institutionalisation' Causal relation: {Church, Denomination} → institutionalises → {Religious_Organisation, Religion} Semantical explanation of religion_ID000003: Religion is a complex and multifaceted social institution that involves a set of beliefs adhered to by the members of a community, typically involving symbols that are regarded with a sense of awe, wonder, or the sacred, along with ritual practices in which members of the community collectively engage to express and reinforce their shared beliefs and values. It often provides a framework for understanding the world, the meaning of life, and the nature of ultimate reality, and can include a moral code, a system of ethics, and a sense of community among believers. Religious beliefs are statements or doctrines to which members of a particular religion adhere, providing a cognitive framework for their faith. Religious experience refers to the subjective feeling or perception of being in direct contact with the ultimate reality, such as a divine being, or of being overcome by intense religious emotion, often considered a powerful and transformative aspect of religious life. Religious rituals are the practices, ceremonies, and behaviours that are required or expected of members of a faith, often performed collectively and imbued with symbolic meaning, serving to reinforce beliefs, create social bonds, and connect individuals to the sacred.
The religion_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Religious Secularisation Process' Causal relation: {Secularisation, Modernisation} → regulates → {Religion, Religious_Organisation} Semantical explanation of religion_ID000004: Religion is a complex and multifaceted social institution that involves a set of beliefs adhered to by the members of a community, typically involving symbols that are regarded with a sense of awe, wonder, or the sacred, along with ritual practices in which members of the community collectively engage to express and reinforce their shared beliefs and values. It often provides a framework for understanding the world, the meaning of life, and the nature of ultimate reality, and can include a moral code, a system of ethics, and a sense of community among believers. Religious beliefs are statements or doctrines to which members of a particular religion adhere, providing a cognitive framework for their faith. Religious experience refers to the subjective feeling or perception of being in direct contact with the ultimate reality, such as a divine being, or of being overcome by intense religious emotion, often considered a powerful and transformative aspect of religious life. Religious rituals are the practices, ceremonies, and behaviours that are required or expected of members of a faith, often performed collectively and imbued with symbolic meaning, serving to reinforce beliefs, create social bonds, and connect individuals to the sacred.
The religion_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Religious Socialisation and Moral Development' Causal relation: {Religion, Religious_Ritual} → socialises → {Value, Socialisation} Semantical explanation of religion_ID000005: Religion is a complex and multifaceted social institution that involves a set of beliefs adhered to by the members of a community, typically involving symbols that are regarded with a sense of awe, wonder, or the sacred, along with ritual practices in which members of the community collectively engage to express and reinforce their shared beliefs and values. It often provides a framework for understanding the world, the meaning of life, and the nature of ultimate reality, and can include a moral code, a system of ethics, and a sense of community among believers. Religious beliefs are statements or doctrines to which members of a particular religion adhere, providing a cognitive framework for their faith. Religious experience refers to the subjective feeling or perception of being in direct contact with the ultimate reality, such as a divine being, or of being overcome by intense religious emotion, often considered a powerful and transformative aspect of religious life. Religious rituals are the practices, ceremonies, and behaviours that are required or expected of members of a faith, often performed collectively and imbued with symbolic meaning, serving to reinforce beliefs, create social bonds, and connect individuals to the sacred.
The religious_Organisation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Religious Institutionalisation' Causal relation: {Church, Denomination} → institutionalises → {Religious_Organisation, Religion} Semantical explanation of religious_Organisation_ID000001: Religious_Organisation encompasses collective entities formed around shared spiritual beliefs, religious practices, and faith traditions that provide meaning, community, and moral guidance to their members. These aggregates vary in their relationship to broader society, from established institutions that are well-integrated into mainstream culture to newer movements that may challenge conventional religious practices. They serve multiple functions including spiritual instruction, community support, ritual facilitation, and moral authority within their respective communities. The diversity within this category reflects different approaches to religious organisation, from hierarchical institutional structures to more informal or innovative religious movements. These organisations play crucial roles in transmitting religious traditions, providing social support networks, and offering frameworks for understanding life's fundamental questions and moral challenges.
The religious_Organisation_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Religious Secularisation Process' Causal relation: {Secularisation, Modernisation} → regulates → {Religion, Religious_Organisation} Semantical explanation of religious_Organisation_ID000002: Religious_Organisation encompasses collective entities formed around shared spiritual beliefs, religious practices, and faith traditions that provide meaning, community, and moral guidance to their members. These aggregates vary in their relationship to broader society, from established institutions that are well-integrated into mainstream culture to newer movements that may challenge conventional religious practices. They serve multiple functions including spiritual instruction, community support, ritual facilitation, and moral authority within their respective communities. The diversity within this category reflects different approaches to religious organisation, from hierarchical institutional structures to more informal or innovative religious movements. These organisations play crucial roles in transmitting religious traditions, providing social support networks, and offering frameworks for understanding life's fundamental questions and moral challenges.
The religious_Ritual_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Religious Socialisation and Moral Development' Causal relation: {Religion, Religious_Ritual} → socialises → {Value, Socialisation} Semantical explanation of religious_Ritual_ID000001: Religious rituals are the formal practices, ceremonies, and behaviours that are required or expected of members of a particular faith or religious community, often performed in a prescribed manner and at specific times or places. These rituals are imbued with symbolic meaning and serve various functions, such as expressing and reinforcing religious beliefs, connecting individuals and communities to the sacred, commemorating important events or myths, marking life transitions, and fostering social cohesion among believers. Religious rituals can include prayer, worship services, sacraments, pilgrimages, festivals, and other communal acts that help to enact and embody the core tenets and values of a religion.
The representative_Democracy_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Democratic Political Governance' Causal relation: {Democracy, Representative_Democracy} → governs → {Political_System, Nation_State} Semantical explanation of representative_Democracy_ID000001: Representative democracy is a political system in which decisions affecting a community or society as a whole are not taken directly by its members but rather by a smaller group of people whom they have elected through a process of voting to represent their interests and make decisions on their behalf. This form of democracy is common in large and complex societies where direct participation by all citizens in every decision may be impractical. Elected representatives are typically accountable to their constituents and may be removed from office through regular elections if they fail to represent their interests effectively.
The representative_Democracy_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Democratic Political Participation' Causal relation: {Democracy, Liberal_Democracy} → participatesIn → {Politics, Representative_Democracy} Semantical explanation of representative_Democracy_ID000002: Representative democracy is a political system in which decisions affecting a community or society as a whole are not taken directly by its members but rather by a smaller group of people whom they have elected through a process of voting to represent their interests and make decisions on their behalf. This form of democracy is common in large and complex societies where direct participation by all citizens in every decision may be impractical. Elected representatives are typically accountable to their constituents and may be removed from office through regular elections if they fail to represent their interests effectively.
The representative_Democracy_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Political Representation Process' Causal relation: {Representative_Democracy, Political_System} → represents → {Democracy, Participatory_Democracy} Semantical explanation of representative_Democracy_ID000003: Representative democracy is a political system in which decisions affecting a community or society as a whole are not taken directly by its members but rather by a smaller group of people whom they have elected through a process of voting to represent their interests and make decisions on their behalf. This form of democracy is common in large and complex societies where direct participation by all citizens in every decision may be impractical. Elected representatives are typically accountable to their constituents and may be removed from office through regular elections if they fail to represent their interests effectively.
The representative_Sample_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Public Opinion Research' Causal relation: {Survey, Questionnaire} → surveys → {Qualitative_Research_Method, Quantitative_Research_Method, Representative_Sample} Semantical explanation of representative_Sample_ID000001: A representative sample is a selection of individuals or cases drawn from a larger population that is statistically found to be typical of that population in terms of key characteristics relevant to the study, such as age, gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or opinions. The goal of obtaining a representative sample is to ensure that the findings from the sample can be generalised with a reasonable degree of accuracy to the entire population from which the sample was drawn, allowing researchers to make broader inferences and conclusions about the population as a whole. Various sampling techniques, including random sampling, stratified sampling, and cluster sampling, are used to try to achieve a representative sample.
The representative_Sample_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Research Data Collection' Causal relation: {Survey, Census} → surveys → {Quantitative_Research_Method, Representative_Sample} Semantical explanation of representative_Sample_ID000002: A representative sample is a selection of individuals or cases drawn from a larger population that is statistically found to be typical of that population in terms of key characteristics relevant to the study, such as age, gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or opinions. The goal of obtaining a representative sample is to ensure that the findings from the sample can be generalised with a reasonable degree of accuracy to the entire population from which the sample was drawn, allowing researchers to make broader inferences and conclusions about the population as a whole. Various sampling techniques, including random sampling, stratified sampling, and cluster sampling, are used to try to achieve a representative sample.
The resocialisation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Resocialisation' Causal relation: {Total_Institution, Degradation_Ceremony} → resocialises → {Resocialisation, Identity} Semantical explanation of resocialisation_ID000001: Resocialisation is a profound process of discarding former behaviour patterns, values, norms, and beliefs that were learned in previous socialisation experiences and accepting new ones as part of a significant transition or change in an individual's life circumstances or social roles. This process often occurs when individuals move into a new social environment with drastically different norms and expectations, such as entering a total institution like a prison or a military boot camp, converting to a new religion, or undergoing a major life change like retirement or becoming a parent. Resocialisation can involve both unlearning old behaviours that are no longer appropriate or functional in the new context and internalizing new ways of thinking, feeling, and acting that are required for successful adaptation to the new social environment.
The resocialisation_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Resocialisation and Identity Change' Causal relation: {Resocialisation, Total_Institution} → governs → {Identity, Social_Role} Semantical explanation of resocialisation_ID000002: Resocialisation is a profound process of discarding former behaviour patterns, values, norms, and beliefs that were learned in previous socialisation experiences and accepting new ones as part of a significant transition or change in an individual's life circumstances or social roles. This process often occurs when individuals move into a new social environment with drastically different norms and expectations, such as entering a total institution like a prison or a military boot camp, converting to a new religion, or undergoing a major life change like retirement or becoming a parent. Resocialisation can involve both unlearning old behaviours that are no longer appropriate or functional in the new context and internalizing new ways of thinking, feeling, and acting that are required for successful adaptation to the new social environment.
The resource_Mobilisation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Organisational Collaborative Relations' Causal relation: {Coalition, Interest_Group} → collaboratesWith → {Resource_Mobilisation, Quality_Circle} Semantical explanation of resource_Mobilisation_ID000001: Resource mobilisation theory (RMT) is a major theoretical perspective in the study of social movements that emphasises the crucial role of resources—such as money, political influence, access to the media, personnel (volunteers and staff), and communication networks—in the emergence, growth, and success of social movements. RMT argues that grievances or social discontent are widespread and are not sufficient on their own to explain the development of social movements; rather, it is the ability of aggrieved groups to mobilise and effectively utilise various types of resources that determines whether a social movement will form and achieve its goals. This theory focuses on the strategic actions of social movement organisations in acquiring, organizing, and deploying resources to challenge existing power structures and bring about social change.
The resource_Mobilisation_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Political Resource Mobilisation' Causal relation: {Political_Action_Committee_(PAC), Interest_Group} → mobilises → {Resource_Mobilisation, Politics} Semantical explanation of resource_Mobilisation_ID000002: Resource mobilisation theory (RMT) is a major theoretical perspective in the study of social movements that emphasises the crucial role of resources—such as money, political influence, access to the media, personnel (volunteers and staff), and communication networks—in the emergence, growth, and success of social movements. RMT argues that grievances or social discontent are widespread and are not sufficient on their own to explain the development of social movements; rather, it is the ability of aggrieved groups to mobilise and effectively utilise various types of resources that determines whether a social movement will form and achieve its goals. This theory focuses on the strategic actions of social movement organisations in acquiring, organizing, and deploying resources to challenge existing power structures and bring about social change.
The resource_Mobilisation_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Resource Mobilisation and Social Movements' Causal relation: {Resource_Mobilisation, Social_Network} → mobilises → {Social_Movement, Collective_Behaviour} Semantical explanation of resource_Mobilisation_ID000003: Resource mobilisation theory (RMT) is a major theoretical perspective in the study of social movements that emphasises the crucial role of resources—such as money, political influence, access to the media, personnel (volunteers and staff), and communication networks—in the emergence, growth, and success of social movements. RMT argues that grievances or social discontent are widespread and are not sufficient on their own to explain the development of social movements; rather, it is the ability of aggrieved groups to mobilise and effectively utilise various types of resources that determines whether a social movement will form and achieve its goals. This theory focuses on the strategic actions of social movement organisations in acquiring, organizing, and deploying resources to challenge existing power structures and bring about social change.
The resource_Mobilisation_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Resource Mobilisation for Collective Action' Causal relation: {Resource_Mobilisation, Political_Action_Committee_(PAC)} → mobilises → {Social_Movement, Strike} Semantical explanation of resource_Mobilisation_ID000004: Resource mobilisation theory (RMT) is a major theoretical perspective in the study of social movements that emphasises the crucial role of resources—such as money, political influence, access to the media, personnel (volunteers and staff), and communication networks—in the emergence, growth, and success of social movements. RMT argues that grievances or social discontent are widespread and are not sufficient on their own to explain the development of social movements; rather, it is the ability of aggrieved groups to mobilise and effectively utilise various types of resources that determines whether a social movement will form and achieve its goals. This theory focuses on the strategic actions of social movement organisations in acquiring, organizing, and deploying resources to challenge existing power structures and bring about social change.
The resource_Mobilisation_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Resource Mobilisation Mobilises Movements' Causal relation: {Resource_Mobilisation} → mobilises → {Social_Movement} Semantical explanation of resource_Mobilisation_ID000005: Resource mobilisation theory (RMT) is a major theoretical perspective in the study of social movements that emphasises the crucial role of resources—such as money, political influence, access to the media, personnel (volunteers and staff), and communication networks—in the emergence, growth, and success of social movements. RMT argues that grievances or social discontent are widespread and are not sufficient on their own to explain the development of social movements; rather, it is the ability of aggrieved groups to mobilise and effectively utilise various types of resources that determines whether a social movement will form and achieve its goals. This theory focuses on the strategic actions of social movement organisations in acquiring, organizing, and deploying resources to challenge existing power structures and bring about social change.
The resource_Mobilisation_ID000006 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Movement Organisation' Causal relation: {Social_Movement, Resource_Mobilisation} → coordinates → {Coalition, Political_Action_Committee_(PAC)} Semantical explanation of resource_Mobilisation_ID000006: Resource mobilisation theory (RMT) is a major theoretical perspective in the study of social movements that emphasises the crucial role of resources—such as money, political influence, access to the media, personnel (volunteers and staff), and communication networks—in the emergence, growth, and success of social movements. RMT argues that grievances or social discontent are widespread and are not sufficient on their own to explain the development of social movements; rather, it is the ability of aggrieved groups to mobilise and effectively utilise various types of resources that determines whether a social movement will form and achieve its goals. This theory focuses on the strategic actions of social movement organisations in acquiring, organizing, and deploying resources to challenge existing power structures and bring about social change.
The resource_Mobilisation_ID000007 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Movements and Political Challenge' Causal relation: {Social_Movement, Resource_Mobilisation} → protests → {Political_System, Government} Semantical explanation of resource_Mobilisation_ID000007: Resource mobilisation theory (RMT) is a major theoretical perspective in the study of social movements that emphasises the crucial role of resources—such as money, political influence, access to the media, personnel (volunteers and staff), and communication networks—in the emergence, growth, and success of social movements. RMT argues that grievances or social discontent are widespread and are not sufficient on their own to explain the development of social movements; rather, it is the ability of aggrieved groups to mobilise and effectively utilise various types of resources that determines whether a social movement will form and achieve its goals. This theory focuses on the strategic actions of social movement organisations in acquiring, organizing, and deploying resources to challenge existing power structures and bring about social change.
The role_Taking_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Anticipatory Socialisation and Status Preparation' Causal relation: {Anticipatory_Socialisation, Role_Taking} → socialises → {Status, Identity} Semantical explanation of role_Taking_ID000001: Role taking is a fundamental social psychological process, particularly emphasised in the symbolic interactionist perspective, that involves mentally assuming the perspective, attitudes, feelings, and expectations of another individual or a group, thereby enabling one to understand how they might think, feel, and respond in a particular situation and to adjust one's own behaviour accordingly. This ability to take the role of the other is crucial for effective communication, social interaction, empathy, and the development of a sense of self, as it allows individuals to anticipate others' reactions and to see themselves from an external viewpoint. George Herbert Mead highlighted the importance of role taking in the development of the self, suggesting that through taking on the roles of significant others and the generalised other, individuals develop a sense of social self and learn to navigate social situations.
The sacred_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Religious Authority and Social Cohesion' Causal relation: {Religion, Traditional_Authority} → transmits → {Sacred, Social_Cohesion} Semantical explanation of sacred_ID000001: The sacred, in the sociological study of religion, refers to those aspects of life, including objects, places, times, symbols, and beliefs, that inspire attitudes of awe, reverence, respect, and even fear among believers in a given set of religious ideas. The sacred is set apart from the ordinary and mundane aspects of everyday existence, which are considered profane. Émile Durkheim emphasised the fundamental distinction between the sacred and the profane as the basis of religious life, arguing that the sacred represents the collective beliefs and values of a society, fostering social solidarity and a sense of shared identity among members of a religious community. Rituals and ceremonies often revolve around the sacred, reinforcing its significance and the emotional bonds between believers.
The science_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Environmental Mobilisation and Sustainability' Causal relation: {Environmental_Sociology, Science} → mobilises → {Sustainable_Development, Natural_Environment} Semantical explanation of science_ID000001: Science is a systematic and logical system of acquiring knowledge about the natural and social world that bases its understanding on direct, systematic observation, empirical evidence, experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses and theories. It is characterised by its commitment to objectivity, empirical verification, and a self-correcting process where new evidence can lead to the revision or rejection of existing knowledge. The scientific method provides a structured approach to conducting research, ensuring rigor and minimizing bias in the pursuit of understanding how the world works. In sociology, science aims to apply these principles to the study of social behaviour, social structures, and social phenomena to develop reliable and valid knowledge about the social world.
The science_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Science Innovates Technology' Causal relation: {Science} → innovates → {Innovation} Semantical explanation of science_ID000002: Science is a systematic and logical system of acquiring knowledge about the natural and social world that bases its understanding on direct, systematic observation, empirical evidence, experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses and theories. It is characterised by its commitment to objectivity, empirical verification, and a self-correcting process where new evidence can lead to the revision or rejection of existing knowledge. The scientific method provides a structured approach to conducting research, ensuring rigor and minimizing bias in the pursuit of understanding how the world works. In sociology, science aims to apply these principles to the study of social behaviour, social structures, and social phenomena to develop reliable and valid knowledge about the social world.
The science_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Technological Innovation and Social Change' Causal relation: {Innovation, Science} → innovates → {Social_Change, Modernisation} Semantical explanation of science_ID000003: Science is a systematic and logical system of acquiring knowledge about the natural and social world that bases its understanding on direct, systematic observation, empirical evidence, experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses and theories. It is characterised by its commitment to objectivity, empirical verification, and a self-correcting process where new evidence can lead to the revision or rejection of existing knowledge. The scientific method provides a structured approach to conducting research, ensuring rigor and minimizing bias in the pursuit of understanding how the world works. In sociology, science aims to apply these principles to the study of social behaviour, social structures, and social phenomena to develop reliable and valid knowledge about the social world.
The secondary_Socialisation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Formal Educational Socialisation' Causal relation: {Education, Hidden_Curriculum} → educates → {Secondary_Socialisation, Cultural_Capital} Semantical explanation of secondary_Socialisation_ID000001: Secondary Socialisation is the process of learning and internalizing the norms, values, behaviours, and roles that are specific to particular social groups, institutions, or contexts outside of the primary family environment. This stage of socialisation typically occurs during adolescence and adulthood, building upon the foundational learning acquired during primary socialisation. Key agents of secondary socialisation include schools (where individuals learn academic knowledge, punctuality, and conformity to formal rules), peer groups (influencing social behaviours, identity formation, and cultural trends), religious institutions (imparting moral beliefs and practices), and the workplace (socializing individuals into professional roles, organisational culture, and specific job responsibilities). Unlike the intimate and emotionally charged nature of primary socialisation, secondary socialisation often involves more impersonal and instrumental relationships, as individuals learn how to navigate diverse social settings and adopt appropriate behaviours for new roles and statuses in a complex society. It is a continuous process of adaptation and learning throughout the life course.
The secondary_Socialisation_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Primary Socialisation Processes' Causal relation: {Nuclear_Family, Extended_Family} → socialises → {Primary_Socialisation, Secondary_Socialisation} Semantical explanation of secondary_Socialisation_ID000002: Secondary Socialisation is the process of learning and internalizing the norms, values, behaviours, and roles that are specific to particular social groups, institutions, or contexts outside of the primary family environment. This stage of socialisation typically occurs during adolescence and adulthood, building upon the foundational learning acquired during primary socialisation. Key agents of secondary socialisation include schools (where individuals learn academic knowledge, punctuality, and conformity to formal rules), peer groups (influencing social behaviours, identity formation, and cultural trends), religious institutions (imparting moral beliefs and practices), and the workplace (socializing individuals into professional roles, organisational culture, and specific job responsibilities). Unlike the intimate and emotionally charged nature of primary socialisation, secondary socialisation often involves more impersonal and instrumental relationships, as individuals learn how to navigate diverse social settings and adopt appropriate behaviours for new roles and statuses in a complex society. It is a continuous process of adaptation and learning throughout the life course.
The secularisation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Religious Secularisation Process' Causal relation: {Secularisation, Modernisation} → regulates → {Religion, Religious_Organisation} Semantical explanation of secularisation_ID000001: Secularisation is a complex and multifaceted process of decline in the social and cultural influence of religion in modern societies. While many contemporary societies have become increasingly secular, the extent and nature of secularisation are subjects of ongoing sociological debate and research. Secularisation can be observed and measured in various ways, including a decrease in levels of individual involvement with religious organisations (such as lower rates of church attendance and religious affiliation), a reduction in the social and material influence wielded by religious institutions in areas like politics, education, and social welfare, and a decline in the degree to which people hold traditional religious beliefs and adhere to religious practices in their personal lives. Secularisation does not necessarily mean the complete disappearance of religion, but rather a shift in its role and significance in society and individual lives, often leading to a greater separation between religious and secular spheres of life.
The segregation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Discrimination Processes and Social Marginalisation' Causal relation: {Discrimination, Segregation, Institutional_Discrimination} → marginalises → {Minority_Group} Semantical explanation of segregation_ID000001: Segregation refers to the act and process of physically, socially, or legally separating two or more groups of people, often based on characteristics such as race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or socioeconomic status. While segregation can occur in various forms, it is frequently imposed on a minority group by a dominant group within a society, leading to unequal access to resources, opportunities, and social institutions such as housing, education, healthcare, and employment. Segregation can be enforced through explicit laws and policies (de jure segregation) or through informal social norms and practices (de facto segregation). It often results in social isolation, limited intergroup contact, and the perpetuation of inequalities between the separated groups. The history of segregation in various parts of the world, such as racial segregation in the United States and apartheid in South Africa, demonstrates its profound and lasting negative impacts on marginalised groups and society as a whole.
The segregation_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Tracking Systems' Causal relation: {Tracking, Education} → segregates → {Segregation, Social_Stratification} Semantical explanation of segregation_ID000002: Segregation refers to the act and process of physically, socially, or legally separating two or more groups of people, often based on characteristics such as race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or socioeconomic status. While segregation can occur in various forms, it is frequently imposed on a minority group by a dominant group within a society, leading to unequal access to resources, opportunities, and social institutions such as housing, education, healthcare, and employment. Segregation can be enforced through explicit laws and policies (de jure segregation) or through informal social norms and practices (de facto segregation). It often results in social isolation, limited intergroup contact, and the perpetuation of inequalities between the separated groups. The history of segregation in various parts of the world, such as racial segregation in the United States and apartheid in South Africa, demonstrates its profound and lasting negative impacts on marginalised groups and society as a whole.
The segregation_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Racial Spatial Segregation' Causal relation: {Apartheid, Institutional_Discrimination} → segregates → {Segregation, Defended_Neighborhood} Semantical explanation of segregation_ID000003: Segregation refers to the act and process of physically, socially, or legally separating two or more groups of people, often based on characteristics such as race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or socioeconomic status. While segregation can occur in various forms, it is frequently imposed on a minority group by a dominant group within a society, leading to unequal access to resources, opportunities, and social institutions such as housing, education, healthcare, and employment. Segregation can be enforced through explicit laws and policies (de jure segregation) or through informal social norms and practices (de facto segregation). It often results in social isolation, limited intergroup contact, and the perpetuation of inequalities between the separated groups. The history of segregation in various parts of the world, such as racial segregation in the United States and apartheid in South Africa, demonstrates its profound and lasting negative impacts on marginalised groups and society as a whole.
The segregation_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Segregation Divides Communities' Causal relation: {Segregation} → segregates → {Social_Class} Semantical explanation of segregation_ID000004: Segregation refers to the act and process of physically, socially, or legally separating two or more groups of people, often based on characteristics such as race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or socioeconomic status. While segregation can occur in various forms, it is frequently imposed on a minority group by a dominant group within a society, leading to unequal access to resources, opportunities, and social institutions such as housing, education, healthcare, and employment. Segregation can be enforced through explicit laws and policies (de jure segregation) or through informal social norms and practices (de facto segregation). It often results in social isolation, limited intergroup contact, and the perpetuation of inequalities between the separated groups. The history of segregation in various parts of the world, such as racial segregation in the United States and apartheid in South Africa, demonstrates its profound and lasting negative impacts on marginalised groups and society as a whole.
The segregation_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Segregation and Spatial Organisation' Causal relation: {Segregation, Social_Class} → segregates → {Urban_Ecology, Social_Social_Spatial_Region} Semantical explanation of segregation_ID000005: Segregation refers to the act and process of physically, socially, or legally separating two or more groups of people, often based on characteristics such as race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or socioeconomic status. While segregation can occur in various forms, it is frequently imposed on a minority group by a dominant group within a society, leading to unequal access to resources, opportunities, and social institutions such as housing, education, healthcare, and employment. Segregation can be enforced through explicit laws and policies (de jure segregation) or through informal social norms and practices (de facto segregation). It often results in social isolation, limited intergroup contact, and the perpetuation of inequalities between the separated groups. The history of segregation in various parts of the world, such as racial segregation in the United States and apartheid in South Africa, demonstrates its profound and lasting negative impacts on marginalised groups and society as a whole.
The segregation_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Suburbanisation and Spatial Restructuring' Causal relation: {Suburb} → spatiallyRelatedTo → {Segregation, Migration} Semantical explanation of segregation_ID000006: Segregation refers to the act and process of physically, socially, or legally separating two or more groups of people, often based on characteristics such as race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or socioeconomic status. While segregation can occur in various forms, it is frequently imposed on a minority group by a dominant group within a society, leading to unequal access to resources, opportunities, and social institutions such as housing, education, healthcare, and employment. Segregation can be enforced through explicit laws and policies (de jure segregation) or through informal social norms and practices (de facto segregation). It often results in social isolation, limited intergroup contact, and the perpetuation of inequalities between the separated groups. The history of segregation in various parts of the world, such as racial segregation in the United States and apartheid in South Africa, demonstrates its profound and lasting negative impacts on marginalised groups and society as a whole.
The sick_Role_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Healthcare Social Control' Causal relation: {Healthcare, Health_Maintenance_Org} → medicinalises → {Social_Control, Sick_Role} Semantical explanation of sick_Role_ID000001: The sick role is a concept in medical sociology, developed by Talcott Parsons, that describes the societal expectations and norms surrounding the attitudes and behaviour of a person who is viewed as being ill. According to this concept, when individuals are sick, they are generally expected to adopt certain behaviours, such as seeking medical attention, trying to get well, and cooperating with healthcare professionals. In return, they are often granted certain exemptions from normal social responsibilities, such as work or school, and are not held responsible for their condition. However, these exemptions are typically conditional on the individual actively trying to recover and return to their normal social roles. The sick role highlights the social aspects of illness and how society shapes our understanding and responses to being sick.
The small_Group_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Primary Group Social Interaction' Causal relation: {Primary_Group, Small_Group} → communicatesWith → {Social_Interaction, Dyad} Semantical explanation of small_Group_ID000001: A small group in sociology is typically defined as a group of individuals that is small enough in size for all members to interact simultaneously with one another, meaning they can engage in direct face-to-face communication, such as talking with one another or at least being personally acquainted. The size of a small group can vary, but it is usually considered to be a number where direct interaction and mutual awareness are feasible, often ranging from a dyad (two people) to a group of around 15-20 members. Small groups are characterised by closer relationships, more intimate interactions, and a greater sense of personal connection and mutual influence among members compared to larger, more formal groups. They play a crucial role in social life, providing a context for primary relationships, socialisation, and the development of social norms and identities.
The social_Change_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Collective Political Resistance' Causal relation: {Social_Movement, Labour_Union} → protests → {Politics, Social_Change} Semantical explanation of social_Change_ID000001: Social change refers to significant alterations over time in the behaviour patterns, social structures, cultural norms, values, and beliefs of a society or a significant part of it. This can occur at various levels, from micro-level changes in individual behaviours and interactions to macro-level transformations in institutions and global systems. Social change can be driven by a multitude of factors, including technological innovations, economic shifts, demographic changes, social movements, cultural diffusion, and political events. It is a continuous and dynamic process that shapes the evolution of societies and can have both positive and negative consequences for different groups within a society.
The social_Change_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Community Mobilisation and Local Development' Causal relation: {Group, Social_Mobility} → mobilises → {Social_Change, Social_Structure} Semantical explanation of social_Change_ID000002: Social change refers to significant alterations over time in the behaviour patterns, social structures, cultural norms, values, and beliefs of a society or a significant part of it. This can occur at various levels, from micro-level changes in individual behaviours and interactions to macro-level transformations in institutions and global systems. Social change can be driven by a multitude of factors, including technological innovations, economic shifts, demographic changes, social movements, cultural diffusion, and political events. It is a continuous and dynamic process that shapes the evolution of societies and can have both positive and negative consequences for different groups within a society.
The social_Change_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Diffusion and Social Innovation' Causal relation: {Diffusion, Cultural_Capital} → hasInfluence → {Innovation, Social_Change} Semantical explanation of social_Change_ID000003: Social change refers to significant alterations over time in the behaviour patterns, social structures, cultural norms, values, and beliefs of a society or a significant part of it. This can occur at various levels, from micro-level changes in individual behaviours and interactions to macro-level transformations in institutions and global systems. Social change can be driven by a multitude of factors, including technological innovations, economic shifts, demographic changes, social movements, cultural diffusion, and political events. It is a continuous and dynamic process that shapes the evolution of societies and can have both positive and negative consequences for different groups within a society.
The social_Change_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Influence and Social Change' Causal relation: {Culture, Value} → hasInfluence → {Social_Change, Social_Structure} Semantical explanation of social_Change_ID000004: Social change refers to significant alterations over time in the behaviour patterns, social structures, cultural norms, values, and beliefs of a society or a significant part of it. This can occur at various levels, from micro-level changes in individual behaviours and interactions to macro-level transformations in institutions and global systems. Social change can be driven by a multitude of factors, including technological innovations, economic shifts, demographic changes, social movements, cultural diffusion, and political events. It is a continuous and dynamic process that shapes the evolution of societies and can have both positive and negative consequences for different groups within a society.
The social_Change_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Culture Influences Behaviour' Causal relation: {Culture} → hasInfluence → {Social_Change} Semantical explanation of social_Change_ID000005: Social change refers to significant alterations over time in the behaviour patterns, social structures, cultural norms, values, and beliefs of a society or a significant part of it. This can occur at various levels, from micro-level changes in individual behaviours and interactions to macro-level transformations in institutions and global systems. Social change can be driven by a multitude of factors, including technological innovations, economic shifts, demographic changes, social movements, cultural diffusion, and political events. It is a continuous and dynamic process that shapes the evolution of societies and can have both positive and negative consequences for different groups within a society.
The social_Change_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Digital Technology Social Transformation' Causal relation: {Internet, E-commerce} → digitalises → {Social_Change, Cyberspace} Semantical explanation of social_Change_ID000006: Social change refers to significant alterations over time in the behaviour patterns, social structures, cultural norms, values, and beliefs of a society or a significant part of it. This can occur at various levels, from micro-level changes in individual behaviours and interactions to macro-level transformations in institutions and global systems. Social change can be driven by a multitude of factors, including technological innovations, economic shifts, demographic changes, social movements, cultural diffusion, and political events. It is a continuous and dynamic process that shapes the evolution of societies and can have both positive and negative consequences for different groups within a society.
The social_Change_ID000007 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Environmental Technology and Development' Causal relation: {Innovation, Sustainable_Development} → influencesHistorically → {Economic_System, Social_Change} Semantical explanation of social_Change_ID000007: Social change refers to significant alterations over time in the behaviour patterns, social structures, cultural norms, values, and beliefs of a society or a significant part of it. This can occur at various levels, from micro-level changes in individual behaviours and interactions to macro-level transformations in institutions and global systems. Social change can be driven by a multitude of factors, including technological innovations, economic shifts, demographic changes, social movements, cultural diffusion, and political events. It is a continuous and dynamic process that shapes the evolution of societies and can have both positive and negative consequences for different groups within a society.
The social_Change_ID000008 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Global Influence and Cultural Exchange' Causal relation: {Global_Village, Internet} → hasInfluence → {Culture, Social_Change, Social_Role} Semantical explanation of social_Change_ID000008: Social change refers to significant alterations over time in the behaviour patterns, social structures, cultural norms, values, and beliefs of a society or a significant part of it. This can occur at various levels, from micro-level changes in individual behaviours and interactions to macro-level transformations in institutions and global systems. Social change can be driven by a multitude of factors, including technological innovations, economic shifts, demographic changes, social movements, cultural diffusion, and political events. It is a continuous and dynamic process that shapes the evolution of societies and can have both positive and negative consequences for different groups within a society.
The social_Change_ID000009 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Power Elite Mobilises Development' Causal relation: {Power_Elite} → mobilises → {Social_Change} Semantical explanation of social_Change_ID000009: Social change refers to significant alterations over time in the behaviour patterns, social structures, cultural norms, values, and beliefs of a society or a significant part of it. This can occur at various levels, from micro-level changes in individual behaviours and interactions to macro-level transformations in institutions and global systems. Social change can be driven by a multitude of factors, including technological innovations, economic shifts, demographic changes, social movements, cultural diffusion, and political events. It is a continuous and dynamic process that shapes the evolution of societies and can have both positive and negative consequences for different groups within a society.
The social_Change_ID000010 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Movement Mobilises Change' Causal relation: {Social_Movement} → mobilises → {Social_Change} Semantical explanation of social_Change_ID000010: Social change refers to significant alterations over time in the behaviour patterns, social structures, cultural norms, values, and beliefs of a society or a significant part of it. This can occur at various levels, from micro-level changes in individual behaviours and interactions to macro-level transformations in institutions and global systems. Social change can be driven by a multitude of factors, including technological innovations, economic shifts, demographic changes, social movements, cultural diffusion, and political events. It is a continuous and dynamic process that shapes the evolution of societies and can have both positive and negative consequences for different groups within a society.
The social_Change_ID000011 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Movements and Collective Action' Causal relation: {Social_Movement, Collective_Behaviour} → mobilises → {Politics, Social_Change} Semantical explanation of social_Change_ID000011: Social change refers to significant alterations over time in the behaviour patterns, social structures, cultural norms, values, and beliefs of a society or a significant part of it. This can occur at various levels, from micro-level changes in individual behaviours and interactions to macro-level transformations in institutions and global systems. Social change can be driven by a multitude of factors, including technological innovations, economic shifts, demographic changes, social movements, cultural diffusion, and political events. It is a continuous and dynamic process that shapes the evolution of societies and can have both positive and negative consequences for different groups within a society.
The social_Change_ID000012 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Technological Influence and Social Adaptation' Causal relation: {Innovation, Cultural_Pluralism} → hasInfluence → {Social_Change, Modernisation} Semantical explanation of social_Change_ID000012: Social change refers to significant alterations over time in the behaviour patterns, social structures, cultural norms, values, and beliefs of a society or a significant part of it. This can occur at various levels, from micro-level changes in individual behaviours and interactions to macro-level transformations in institutions and global systems. Social change can be driven by a multitude of factors, including technological innovations, economic shifts, demographic changes, social movements, cultural diffusion, and political events. It is a continuous and dynamic process that shapes the evolution of societies and can have both positive and negative consequences for different groups within a society.
The social_Change_ID000013 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Technological Innovation and Social Change' Causal relation: {Innovation, Science} → innovates → {Social_Change, Modernisation} Semantical explanation of social_Change_ID000013: Social change refers to significant alterations over time in the behaviour patterns, social structures, cultural norms, values, and beliefs of a society or a significant part of it. This can occur at various levels, from micro-level changes in individual behaviours and interactions to macro-level transformations in institutions and global systems. Social change can be driven by a multitude of factors, including technological innovations, economic shifts, demographic changes, social movements, cultural diffusion, and political events. It is a continuous and dynamic process that shapes the evolution of societies and can have both positive and negative consequences for different groups within a society.
The social_Change_ID000014 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Technological Social Innovation' Causal relation: {Innovation, Industrial_Revolution} → innovates → {Social_Change, Invention} Semantical explanation of social_Change_ID000014: Social change refers to significant alterations over time in the behaviour patterns, social structures, cultural norms, values, and beliefs of a society or a significant part of it. This can occur at various levels, from micro-level changes in individual behaviours and interactions to macro-level transformations in institutions and global systems. Social change can be driven by a multitude of factors, including technological innovations, economic shifts, demographic changes, social movements, cultural diffusion, and political events. It is a continuous and dynamic process that shapes the evolution of societies and can have both positive and negative consequences for different groups within a society.
The social_Change_ID000015 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Technology and Social Change' Causal relation: {Innovation, Healthcare} → influencesHistorically → {Social_Change, Holistic_Medicine} Semantical explanation of social_Change_ID000015: Social change refers to significant alterations over time in the behaviour patterns, social structures, cultural norms, values, and beliefs of a society or a significant part of it. This can occur at various levels, from micro-level changes in individual behaviours and interactions to macro-level transformations in institutions and global systems. Social change can be driven by a multitude of factors, including technological innovations, economic shifts, demographic changes, social movements, cultural diffusion, and political events. It is a continuous and dynamic process that shapes the evolution of societies and can have both positive and negative consequences for different groups within a society.
The social_Change_ID000016 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Youth Mobilisation and Social Change' Causal relation: {Youth_Culture, Social_Movement} → mobilises → {Social_Change, Culture} Semantical explanation of social_Change_ID000016: Social change refers to significant alterations over time in the behaviour patterns, social structures, cultural norms, values, and beliefs of a society or a significant part of it. This can occur at various levels, from micro-level changes in individual behaviours and interactions to macro-level transformations in institutions and global systems. Social change can be driven by a multitude of factors, including technological innovations, economic shifts, demographic changes, social movements, cultural diffusion, and political events. It is a continuous and dynamic process that shapes the evolution of societies and can have both positive and negative consequences for different groups within a society.
The social_Class_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Reproduction and Social Inequality' Causal relation: {Cultural_Capital, Family} → reproduces → {Social_Class, Social_Mobility} Semantical explanation of social_Class_ID000001: Social Class is a fundamental concept within social stratification, referring to a large group of people who share a similar economic position in society, primarily based on their relationship to the means of production, income, wealth, and occupation. While specific definitions vary, major sociological class distinctions often include the upper class (those with inherited wealth or control of large businesses), the middle class (professionals, managers, small business owners), the working class (manual or blue-collar laborers), and the underclass (those experiencing chronic poverty and marginalisation). Social class influences an individual's life chances, affecting their access to education, healthcare, housing, and opportunities for social mobility. Marxist theory emphasises class consciousness and the inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) and the proletariat (working class) over the means of production. Understanding social class is crucial for analysing structured inequalities, economic exploitation, and the distribution of power and resources within a society.
The social_Class_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Class Stratification' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Economic_System} → stratifies → {Social_Class, Social_Stratification} Semantical explanation of social_Class_ID000002: Social Class is a fundamental concept within social stratification, referring to a large group of people who share a similar economic position in society, primarily based on their relationship to the means of production, income, wealth, and occupation. While specific definitions vary, major sociological class distinctions often include the upper class (those with inherited wealth or control of large businesses), the middle class (professionals, managers, small business owners), the working class (manual or blue-collar laborers), and the underclass (those experiencing chronic poverty and marginalisation). Social class influences an individual's life chances, affecting their access to education, healthcare, housing, and opportunities for social mobility. Marxist theory emphasises class consciousness and the inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) and the proletariat (working class) over the means of production. Understanding social class is crucial for analysing structured inequalities, economic exploitation, and the distribution of power and resources within a society.
The social_Class_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Social Reproduction' Causal relation: {Education, Hidden_Curriculum} → reproduces → {Cultural_Reproduction, Social_Class} Semantical explanation of social_Class_ID000003: Social Class is a fundamental concept within social stratification, referring to a large group of people who share a similar economic position in society, primarily based on their relationship to the means of production, income, wealth, and occupation. While specific definitions vary, major sociological class distinctions often include the upper class (those with inherited wealth or control of large businesses), the middle class (professionals, managers, small business owners), the working class (manual or blue-collar laborers), and the underclass (those experiencing chronic poverty and marginalisation). Social class influences an individual's life chances, affecting their access to education, healthcare, housing, and opportunities for social mobility. Marxist theory emphasises class consciousness and the inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) and the proletariat (working class) over the means of production. Understanding social class is crucial for analysing structured inequalities, economic exploitation, and the distribution of power and resources within a society.
The social_Class_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Stratification and Opportunity' Causal relation: {Education, Tracking} → stratifies → {Social_Class, Social_Mobility} Semantical explanation of social_Class_ID000004: Social Class is a fundamental concept within social stratification, referring to a large group of people who share a similar economic position in society, primarily based on their relationship to the means of production, income, wealth, and occupation. While specific definitions vary, major sociological class distinctions often include the upper class (those with inherited wealth or control of large businesses), the middle class (professionals, managers, small business owners), the working class (manual or blue-collar laborers), and the underclass (those experiencing chronic poverty and marginalisation). Social class influences an individual's life chances, affecting their access to education, healthcare, housing, and opportunities for social mobility. Marxist theory emphasises class consciousness and the inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) and the proletariat (working class) over the means of production. Understanding social class is crucial for analysing structured inequalities, economic exploitation, and the distribution of power and resources within a society.
The social_Class_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Systems and Social Mobility' Causal relation: {Education, Cultural_Capital} → educates → {Social_Mobility, Social_Class} Semantical explanation of social_Class_ID000005: Social Class is a fundamental concept within social stratification, referring to a large group of people who share a similar economic position in society, primarily based on their relationship to the means of production, income, wealth, and occupation. While specific definitions vary, major sociological class distinctions often include the upper class (those with inherited wealth or control of large businesses), the middle class (professionals, managers, small business owners), the working class (manual or blue-collar laborers), and the underclass (those experiencing chronic poverty and marginalisation). Social class influences an individual's life chances, affecting their access to education, healthcare, housing, and opportunities for social mobility. Marxist theory emphasises class consciousness and the inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) and the proletariat (working class) over the means of production. Understanding social class is crucial for analysing structured inequalities, economic exploitation, and the distribution of power and resources within a society.
The social_Class_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Higher Education Stratification' Causal relation: {Education, Cultural_Capital} → educates → {Social_Class, Social_Stratification} Semantical explanation of social_Class_ID000006: Social Class is a fundamental concept within social stratification, referring to a large group of people who share a similar economic position in society, primarily based on their relationship to the means of production, income, wealth, and occupation. While specific definitions vary, major sociological class distinctions often include the upper class (those with inherited wealth or control of large businesses), the middle class (professionals, managers, small business owners), the working class (manual or blue-collar laborers), and the underclass (those experiencing chronic poverty and marginalisation). Social class influences an individual's life chances, affecting their access to education, healthcare, housing, and opportunities for social mobility. Marxist theory emphasises class consciousness and the inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) and the proletariat (working class) over the means of production. Understanding social class is crucial for analysing structured inequalities, economic exploitation, and the distribution of power and resources within a society.
The social_Class_ID000007 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Racial Stratification and Social Hierarchy' Causal relation: {Racism, Ethnic_Group} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification, Social_Class} Semantical explanation of social_Class_ID000007: Social Class is a fundamental concept within social stratification, referring to a large group of people who share a similar economic position in society, primarily based on their relationship to the means of production, income, wealth, and occupation. While specific definitions vary, major sociological class distinctions often include the upper class (those with inherited wealth or control of large businesses), the middle class (professionals, managers, small business owners), the working class (manual or blue-collar laborers), and the underclass (those experiencing chronic poverty and marginalisation). Social class influences an individual's life chances, affecting their access to education, healthcare, housing, and opportunities for social mobility. Marxist theory emphasises class consciousness and the inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) and the proletariat (working class) over the means of production. Understanding social class is crucial for analysing structured inequalities, economic exploitation, and the distribution of power and resources within a society.
The social_Class_ID000008 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Segregation Divides Communities' Causal relation: {Segregation} → segregates → {Social_Class} Semantical explanation of social_Class_ID000008: Social Class is a fundamental concept within social stratification, referring to a large group of people who share a similar economic position in society, primarily based on their relationship to the means of production, income, wealth, and occupation. While specific definitions vary, major sociological class distinctions often include the upper class (those with inherited wealth or control of large businesses), the middle class (professionals, managers, small business owners), the working class (manual or blue-collar laborers), and the underclass (those experiencing chronic poverty and marginalisation). Social class influences an individual's life chances, affecting their access to education, healthcare, housing, and opportunities for social mobility. Marxist theory emphasises class consciousness and the inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) and the proletariat (working class) over the means of production. Understanding social class is crucial for analysing structured inequalities, economic exploitation, and the distribution of power and resources within a society.
The social_Class_ID000009 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Reproduction Processes' Causal relation: {Cultural_Reproduction, Education} → reproduces → {Social_Class, Cultural_Capital} Semantical explanation of social_Class_ID000009: Social Class is a fundamental concept within social stratification, referring to a large group of people who share a similar economic position in society, primarily based on their relationship to the means of production, income, wealth, and occupation. While specific definitions vary, major sociological class distinctions often include the upper class (those with inherited wealth or control of large businesses), the middle class (professionals, managers, small business owners), the working class (manual or blue-collar laborers), and the underclass (those experiencing chronic poverty and marginalisation). Social class influences an individual's life chances, affecting their access to education, healthcare, housing, and opportunities for social mobility. Marxist theory emphasises class consciousness and the inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) and the proletariat (working class) over the means of production. Understanding social class is crucial for analysing structured inequalities, economic exploitation, and the distribution of power and resources within a society.
The social_Class_ID000010 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Segregation and Spatial Organisation' Causal relation: {Segregation, Social_Class} → segregates → {Urban_Ecology, Social_Social_Spatial_Region} Semantical explanation of social_Class_ID000010: Social Class is a fundamental concept within social stratification, referring to a large group of people who share a similar economic position in society, primarily based on their relationship to the means of production, income, wealth, and occupation. While specific definitions vary, major sociological class distinctions often include the upper class (those with inherited wealth or control of large businesses), the middle class (professionals, managers, small business owners), the working class (manual or blue-collar laborers), and the underclass (those experiencing chronic poverty and marginalisation). Social class influences an individual's life chances, affecting their access to education, healthcare, housing, and opportunities for social mobility. Marxist theory emphasises class consciousness and the inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) and the proletariat (working class) over the means of production. Understanding social class is crucial for analysing structured inequalities, economic exploitation, and the distribution of power and resources within a society.
The social_Class_ID000011 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Urban Gentrification and Social Displacement' Causal relation: {Gentrification, Urban_Renewal} → gentrifies → {Working_Class, Social_Class} Semantical explanation of social_Class_ID000011: Social Class is a fundamental concept within social stratification, referring to a large group of people who share a similar economic position in society, primarily based on their relationship to the means of production, income, wealth, and occupation. While specific definitions vary, major sociological class distinctions often include the upper class (those with inherited wealth or control of large businesses), the middle class (professionals, managers, small business owners), the working class (manual or blue-collar laborers), and the underclass (those experiencing chronic poverty and marginalisation). Social class influences an individual's life chances, affecting their access to education, healthcare, housing, and opportunities for social mobility. Marxist theory emphasises class consciousness and the inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) and the proletariat (working class) over the means of production. Understanding social class is crucial for analysing structured inequalities, economic exploitation, and the distribution of power and resources within a society.
The social_Cohesion_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Digital Communication and Social Transformation' Causal relation: {Internet, Cyberspace} → digitalises → {Social_Interaction, Social_Cohesion} Semantical explanation of social_Cohesion_ID000001: Social Cohesion refers to the degree of solidarity, unity, and sense of belonging that exists among individuals and groups within a society, reflecting the bonds that tie people together and enable them to live and work together effectively. It is characterised by shared values, common norms, mutual trust, and a willingness to cooperate for the collective good. Émile Durkheim identified two types of social cohesion: mechanical solidarity, found in traditional societies based on homogeneity and shared morality, and organic solidarity, prevalent in modern, complex societies based on interdependence and specialisation. High levels of social cohesion contribute to social stability, order, and collective well-being, fostering a sense of community and mutual support. Conversely, a lack of social cohesion can lead to social disorganisation, conflict, and a sense of anomie or normlessness among individuals.
The social_Cohesion_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Influence Affects Behaviour' Causal relation: {Influence} → hasInfluence → {Social_Cohesion} Semantical explanation of social_Cohesion_ID000002: Social Cohesion refers to the degree of solidarity, unity, and sense of belonging that exists among individuals and groups within a society, reflecting the bonds that tie people together and enable them to live and work together effectively. It is characterised by shared values, common norms, mutual trust, and a willingness to cooperate for the collective good. Émile Durkheim identified two types of social cohesion: mechanical solidarity, found in traditional societies based on homogeneity and shared morality, and organic solidarity, prevalent in modern, complex societies based on interdependence and specialisation. High levels of social cohesion contribute to social stability, order, and collective well-being, fostering a sense of community and mutual support. Conversely, a lack of social cohesion can lead to social disorganisation, conflict, and a sense of anomie or normlessness among individuals.
The social_Cohesion_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Professional Network Formation' Causal relation: {Professional_Criminal, Entrepreneur} → networks → {Social_Network, Social_Cohesion} Semantical explanation of social_Cohesion_ID000003: Social Cohesion refers to the degree of solidarity, unity, and sense of belonging that exists among individuals and groups within a society, reflecting the bonds that tie people together and enable them to live and work together effectively. It is characterised by shared values, common norms, mutual trust, and a willingness to cooperate for the collective good. Émile Durkheim identified two types of social cohesion: mechanical solidarity, found in traditional societies based on homogeneity and shared morality, and organic solidarity, prevalent in modern, complex societies based on interdependence and specialisation. High levels of social cohesion contribute to social stability, order, and collective well-being, fostering a sense of community and mutual support. Conversely, a lack of social cohesion can lead to social disorganisation, conflict, and a sense of anomie or normlessness among individuals.
The social_Cohesion_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Religious Authority and Social Cohesion' Causal relation: {Religion, Traditional_Authority} → transmits → {Sacred, Social_Cohesion} Semantical explanation of social_Cohesion_ID000004: Social Cohesion refers to the degree of solidarity, unity, and sense of belonging that exists among individuals and groups within a society, reflecting the bonds that tie people together and enable them to live and work together effectively. It is characterised by shared values, common norms, mutual trust, and a willingness to cooperate for the collective good. Émile Durkheim identified two types of social cohesion: mechanical solidarity, found in traditional societies based on homogeneity and shared morality, and organic solidarity, prevalent in modern, complex societies based on interdependence and specialisation. High levels of social cohesion contribute to social stability, order, and collective well-being, fostering a sense of community and mutual support. Conversely, a lack of social cohesion can lead to social disorganisation, conflict, and a sense of anomie or normlessness among individuals.
The social_Cohesion_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Coordination and Conflict Resolution' Causal relation: {Negotiation, Conflict_Perspective} → coordinates → {Social_Movement, Social_Cohesion} Semantical explanation of social_Cohesion_ID000005: Social Cohesion refers to the degree of solidarity, unity, and sense of belonging that exists among individuals and groups within a society, reflecting the bonds that tie people together and enable them to live and work together effectively. It is characterised by shared values, common norms, mutual trust, and a willingness to cooperate for the collective good. Émile Durkheim identified two types of social cohesion: mechanical solidarity, found in traditional societies based on homogeneity and shared morality, and organic solidarity, prevalent in modern, complex societies based on interdependence and specialisation. High levels of social cohesion contribute to social stability, order, and collective well-being, fostering a sense of community and mutual support. Conversely, a lack of social cohesion can lead to social disorganisation, conflict, and a sense of anomie or normlessness among individuals.
The social_Consciousness_And_Theoretical_Quality_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media Influence on Social Consciousness' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Internet} → hasInfluence → {Social_Consciousness_And_Theoretical_Quality, Public_Sphere} Semantical explanation of social_Consciousness_And_Theoretical_Quality_ID000001: Social_Consciousness_And_Theoretical_Quality encompasses characteristics related to social awareness, theoretical understanding, and the various forms of consciousness that shape social life and social change. These qualities include both individual and collective forms of social awareness, theoretical concepts that explain social phenomena, and the various ways that social actors understand and interpret their social world. They represent the cognitive and interpretive dimensions of social life that influence how people understand their social position, relationships, and possibilities for action. These qualities are central to understanding social change, political mobilisation, and the role of ideas and consciousness in shaping social reality.
The social_Constructionist_Perspective_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Stigmatisation Processes' Causal relation: {Labeling_Theory, Social_Constructionist_Perspective} → stigmatises → {Stigma, Deviance} Semantical explanation of social_Constructionist_Perspective_ID000001: The social constructionist perspective is a sociological approach to understanding various social phenomena, including deviance, that emphasises the role of culture, social interaction, and shared meanings in the creation and definition of social reality. In the context of deviance, this perspective argues that what is considered deviant is not inherent in a particular behaviour itself but rather is socially defined and labeled as such by particular groups or societies based on cultural norms, values, and power dynamics. The social construction of deviance involves processes through which certain behaviours come to be defined as unacceptable or abnormal, and individuals who engage in these behaviours are labeled as deviant, often with significant social consequences for their identity and life chances. This perspective highlights the relativity of deviance across different cultures and time periods.
The social_Control_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Government Governs Society' Causal relation: {Government} → governs → {Social_Control} Semantical explanation of social_Control_ID000001: Social control refers to the diverse techniques, mechanisms, and strategies that are used by individuals, groups, institutions, and societies to prevent or regulate deviant human behaviour and to ensure conformity to established norms, rules, and laws. Social control can be informal, operating through everyday social interactions and the use of social sanctions such as disapproval, ridicule, or ostracism within families, peer groups, and communities. It can also be formal, involving the use of laws, regulations, and the authority of institutions like the police, courts, and correctional systems to enforce norms and punish deviance. The goal of social control is to maintain social order, stability, and cohesion within a society.
The social_Control_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Healthcare Social Control' Causal relation: {Healthcare, Health_Maintenance_Org} → medicinalises → {Social_Control, Sick_Role} Semantical explanation of social_Control_ID000002: Social control refers to the diverse techniques, mechanisms, and strategies that are used by individuals, groups, institutions, and societies to prevent or regulate deviant human behaviour and to ensure conformity to established norms, rules, and laws. Social control can be informal, operating through everyday social interactions and the use of social sanctions such as disapproval, ridicule, or ostracism within families, peer groups, and communities. It can also be formal, involving the use of laws, regulations, and the authority of institutions like the police, courts, and correctional systems to enforce norms and punish deviance. The goal of social control is to maintain social order, stability, and cohesion within a society.
The social_Control_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Control and Social Regulation' Causal relation: {Social_Institution, Law} → controls → {Social_Control, Formal_Social_Control} Semantical explanation of social_Control_ID000003: Social control refers to the diverse techniques, mechanisms, and strategies that are used by individuals, groups, institutions, and societies to prevent or regulate deviant human behaviour and to ensure conformity to established norms, rules, and laws. Social control can be informal, operating through everyday social interactions and the use of social sanctions such as disapproval, ridicule, or ostracism within families, peer groups, and communities. It can also be formal, involving the use of laws, regulations, and the authority of institutions like the police, courts, and correctional systems to enforce norms and punish deviance. The goal of social control is to maintain social order, stability, and cohesion within a society.
The social_Control_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Law Controls Behaviour' Causal relation: {Law} → hasInfluence → {Social_Control} Semantical explanation of social_Control_ID000004: Social control refers to the diverse techniques, mechanisms, and strategies that are used by individuals, groups, institutions, and societies to prevent or regulate deviant human behaviour and to ensure conformity to established norms, rules, and laws. Social control can be informal, operating through everyday social interactions and the use of social sanctions such as disapproval, ridicule, or ostracism within families, peer groups, and communities. It can also be formal, involving the use of laws, regulations, and the authority of institutions like the police, courts, and correctional systems to enforce norms and punish deviance. The goal of social control is to maintain social order, stability, and cohesion within a society.
The social_Control_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media and Crime Perception' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Crime} → influencesHistorically → {Social_Control, Deviance} Semantical explanation of social_Control_ID000005: Social control refers to the diverse techniques, mechanisms, and strategies that are used by individuals, groups, institutions, and societies to prevent or regulate deviant human behaviour and to ensure conformity to established norms, rules, and laws. Social control can be informal, operating through everyday social interactions and the use of social sanctions such as disapproval, ridicule, or ostracism within families, peer groups, and communities. It can also be formal, involving the use of laws, regulations, and the authority of institutions like the police, courts, and correctional systems to enforce norms and punish deviance. The goal of social control is to maintain social order, stability, and cohesion within a society.
The social_Control_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Political Authority and Social Control' Causal relation: {Government, Bureaucracy} → governs → {Social_Control, Law} Semantical explanation of social_Control_ID000006: Social control refers to the diverse techniques, mechanisms, and strategies that are used by individuals, groups, institutions, and societies to prevent or regulate deviant human behaviour and to ensure conformity to established norms, rules, and laws. Social control can be informal, operating through everyday social interactions and the use of social sanctions such as disapproval, ridicule, or ostracism within families, peer groups, and communities. It can also be formal, involving the use of laws, regulations, and the authority of institutions like the police, courts, and correctional systems to enforce norms and punish deviance. The goal of social control is to maintain social order, stability, and cohesion within a society.
The social_Control_ID000007 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Power and Political Control' Causal relation: {Power, Authority} → controls → {Government, Social_Control} Semantical explanation of social_Control_ID000007: Social control refers to the diverse techniques, mechanisms, and strategies that are used by individuals, groups, institutions, and societies to prevent or regulate deviant human behaviour and to ensure conformity to established norms, rules, and laws. Social control can be informal, operating through everyday social interactions and the use of social sanctions such as disapproval, ridicule, or ostracism within families, peer groups, and communities. It can also be formal, involving the use of laws, regulations, and the authority of institutions like the police, courts, and correctional systems to enforce norms and punish deviance. The goal of social control is to maintain social order, stability, and cohesion within a society.
The social_Control_ID000008 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Rehabilitation and Social Reintegration' Causal relation: {Rehabilitation, Capital_Punishment} → influencesHistorically → {Crime, Social_Control} Semantical explanation of social_Control_ID000008: Social control refers to the diverse techniques, mechanisms, and strategies that are used by individuals, groups, institutions, and societies to prevent or regulate deviant human behaviour and to ensure conformity to established norms, rules, and laws. Social control can be informal, operating through everyday social interactions and the use of social sanctions such as disapproval, ridicule, or ostracism within families, peer groups, and communities. It can also be formal, involving the use of laws, regulations, and the authority of institutions like the police, courts, and correctional systems to enforce norms and punish deviance. The goal of social control is to maintain social order, stability, and cohesion within a society.
The social_Control_ID000009 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Control and Crime Prevention' Causal relation: {Law, Social_Control} → controls → {Crime, Formal_Social_Control} Semantical explanation of social_Control_ID000009: Social control refers to the diverse techniques, mechanisms, and strategies that are used by individuals, groups, institutions, and societies to prevent or regulate deviant human behaviour and to ensure conformity to established norms, rules, and laws. Social control can be informal, operating through everyday social interactions and the use of social sanctions such as disapproval, ridicule, or ostracism within families, peer groups, and communities. It can also be formal, involving the use of laws, regulations, and the authority of institutions like the police, courts, and correctional systems to enforce norms and punish deviance. The goal of social control is to maintain social order, stability, and cohesion within a society.
The social_Control_ID000010 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Control and Deviance Prevention' Causal relation: {Social_Control, Formal_Social_Control} → controls → {Deviance, Informal_Social_Control} Semantical explanation of social_Control_ID000010: Social control refers to the diverse techniques, mechanisms, and strategies that are used by individuals, groups, institutions, and societies to prevent or regulate deviant human behaviour and to ensure conformity to established norms, rules, and laws. Social control can be informal, operating through everyday social interactions and the use of social sanctions such as disapproval, ridicule, or ostracism within families, peer groups, and communities. It can also be formal, involving the use of laws, regulations, and the authority of institutions like the police, courts, and correctional systems to enforce norms and punish deviance. The goal of social control is to maintain social order, stability, and cohesion within a society.
The social_Control_ID000011 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Control and Normative Regulation' Causal relation: {Social_Control, Law} → regulates → {Deviance, Crime} Semantical explanation of social_Control_ID000011: Social control refers to the diverse techniques, mechanisms, and strategies that are used by individuals, groups, institutions, and societies to prevent or regulate deviant human behaviour and to ensure conformity to established norms, rules, and laws. Social control can be informal, operating through everyday social interactions and the use of social sanctions such as disapproval, ridicule, or ostracism within families, peer groups, and communities. It can also be formal, involving the use of laws, regulations, and the authority of institutions like the police, courts, and correctional systems to enforce norms and punish deviance. The goal of social control is to maintain social order, stability, and cohesion within a society.
The social_Control_ID000012 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Control Regulates Behaviour' Causal relation: {Social_Control} → regulates → {Deviance} Semantical explanation of social_Control_ID000012: Social control refers to the diverse techniques, mechanisms, and strategies that are used by individuals, groups, institutions, and societies to prevent or regulate deviant human behaviour and to ensure conformity to established norms, rules, and laws. Social control can be informal, operating through everyday social interactions and the use of social sanctions such as disapproval, ridicule, or ostracism within families, peer groups, and communities. It can also be formal, involving the use of laws, regulations, and the authority of institutions like the police, courts, and correctional systems to enforce norms and punish deviance. The goal of social control is to maintain social order, stability, and cohesion within a society.
The social_Control_ID000013 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Institutions Control Behaviour' Causal relation: {Social_Institution} → hasInfluence → {Social_Control} Semantical explanation of social_Control_ID000013: Social control refers to the diverse techniques, mechanisms, and strategies that are used by individuals, groups, institutions, and societies to prevent or regulate deviant human behaviour and to ensure conformity to established norms, rules, and laws. Social control can be informal, operating through everyday social interactions and the use of social sanctions such as disapproval, ridicule, or ostracism within families, peer groups, and communities. It can also be formal, involving the use of laws, regulations, and the authority of institutions like the police, courts, and correctional systems to enforce norms and punish deviance. The goal of social control is to maintain social order, stability, and cohesion within a society.
The social_Control_ID000014 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Regulation and Norm Enforcement' Causal relation: {Social_Control, Norm} → regulates → {Deviance, Formal_Social_Control} Semantical explanation of social_Control_ID000014: Social control refers to the diverse techniques, mechanisms, and strategies that are used by individuals, groups, institutions, and societies to prevent or regulate deviant human behaviour and to ensure conformity to established norms, rules, and laws. Social control can be informal, operating through everyday social interactions and the use of social sanctions such as disapproval, ridicule, or ostracism within families, peer groups, and communities. It can also be formal, involving the use of laws, regulations, and the authority of institutions like the police, courts, and correctional systems to enforce norms and punish deviance. The goal of social control is to maintain social order, stability, and cohesion within a society.
The social_Control_ID000015 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'State Social Control Mechanisms' Causal relation: {State, Government} → regulates → {Social_Control, Law} Semantical explanation of social_Control_ID000015: Social control refers to the diverse techniques, mechanisms, and strategies that are used by individuals, groups, institutions, and societies to prevent or regulate deviant human behaviour and to ensure conformity to established norms, rules, and laws. Social control can be informal, operating through everyday social interactions and the use of social sanctions such as disapproval, ridicule, or ostracism within families, peer groups, and communities. It can also be formal, involving the use of laws, regulations, and the authority of institutions like the police, courts, and correctional systems to enforce norms and punish deviance. The goal of social control is to maintain social order, stability, and cohesion within a society.
The social_Control_ID000016 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Surveillance Social Control' Causal relation: {Formal_Social_Control, State} → monitors → {Observation, Social_Control} Semantical explanation of social_Control_ID000016: Social control refers to the diverse techniques, mechanisms, and strategies that are used by individuals, groups, institutions, and societies to prevent or regulate deviant human behaviour and to ensure conformity to established norms, rules, and laws. Social control can be informal, operating through everyday social interactions and the use of social sanctions such as disapproval, ridicule, or ostracism within families, peer groups, and communities. It can also be formal, involving the use of laws, regulations, and the authority of institutions like the police, courts, and correctional systems to enforce norms and punish deviance. The goal of social control is to maintain social order, stability, and cohesion within a society.
The social_Epidemiology_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Healthcare Mobilisation and Public Health' Causal relation: {Healthcare} → mobilises → {Mortality_Rate, Health_Maintenance_Org, Social_Epidemiology} Semantical explanation of social_Epidemiology_ID000001: Social epidemiology is a subfield within epidemiology and sociology that focuses on the study of the social determinants of health, examining the distribution of disease, impairment, and general health status across a population and identifying the social factors, such as socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, gender, social networks, and neighborhood conditions, that influence health outcomes and contribute to health inequalities within and between populations. Social epidemiologists investigate how these social factors affect the risk, incidence, prevalence, and progression of diseases, as well as overall well-being, aiming to understand the underlying social mechanisms that shape health and to inform public health policies and interventions that can reduce health disparities and promote health equity.
The social_Exclusion_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Apartheid and Racial Segregation' Causal relation: {Apartheid, Racism} → segregates → {Racial_Group, Social_Exclusion} Semantical explanation of social_Exclusion_ID000001: Social exclusion is a complex and multidimensional process and outcome where individuals or groups are prevented from fully participating in the economic, social, political, and cultural life of the society in which they are located due to a combination of multiple and often intersecting deprivations. These deprivations can include lack of adequate income and resources, limited access to employment, education, healthcare, housing, and social support networks, as well as experiences of discrimination, marginalisation, and a lack of voice or power in decision-making processes that affect their lives. Social exclusion can lead to feelings of isolation, alienation, and a diminished sense of belonging, hindering individuals' ability to exercise their rights, fulfill their potential, and participate as full and valued members of society. Addressing social exclusion requires tackling the various interconnected factors that contribute to it through inclusive policies and practices that promote equal opportunities and social integration for all members of society.
The social_Exclusion_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Deviance Marginalises Individuals' Causal relation: {Deviance} → marginalises → {Social_Exclusion} Semantical explanation of social_Exclusion_ID000002: Social exclusion is a complex and multidimensional process and outcome where individuals or groups are prevented from fully participating in the economic, social, political, and cultural life of the society in which they are located due to a combination of multiple and often intersecting deprivations. These deprivations can include lack of adequate income and resources, limited access to employment, education, healthcare, housing, and social support networks, as well as experiences of discrimination, marginalisation, and a lack of voice or power in decision-making processes that affect their lives. Social exclusion can lead to feelings of isolation, alienation, and a diminished sense of belonging, hindering individuals' ability to exercise their rights, fulfill their potential, and participate as full and valued members of society. Addressing social exclusion requires tackling the various interconnected factors that contribute to it through inclusive policies and practices that promote equal opportunities and social integration for all members of society.
The social_Exclusion_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Discrimination and Social Exclusion' Causal relation: {Racism, Gender_Inequality} → discriminatesAgainst → {Social_Exclusion, Minority_Group} Semantical explanation of social_Exclusion_ID000003: Social exclusion is a complex and multidimensional process and outcome where individuals or groups are prevented from fully participating in the economic, social, political, and cultural life of the society in which they are located due to a combination of multiple and often intersecting deprivations. These deprivations can include lack of adequate income and resources, limited access to employment, education, healthcare, housing, and social support networks, as well as experiences of discrimination, marginalisation, and a lack of voice or power in decision-making processes that affect their lives. Social exclusion can lead to feelings of isolation, alienation, and a diminished sense of belonging, hindering individuals' ability to exercise their rights, fulfill their potential, and participate as full and valued members of society. Addressing social exclusion requires tackling the various interconnected factors that contribute to it through inclusive policies and practices that promote equal opportunities and social integration for all members of society.
The social_Exclusion_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Labeling and Deviant Identity Formation' Causal relation: {Labeling_Theory, Stigma} → stigmatises → {Deviance, Social_Exclusion} Semantical explanation of social_Exclusion_ID000004: Social exclusion is a complex and multidimensional process and outcome where individuals or groups are prevented from fully participating in the economic, social, political, and cultural life of the society in which they are located due to a combination of multiple and often intersecting deprivations. These deprivations can include lack of adequate income and resources, limited access to employment, education, healthcare, housing, and social support networks, as well as experiences of discrimination, marginalisation, and a lack of voice or power in decision-making processes that affect their lives. Social exclusion can lead to feelings of isolation, alienation, and a diminished sense of belonging, hindering individuals' ability to exercise their rights, fulfill their potential, and participate as full and valued members of society. Addressing social exclusion requires tackling the various interconnected factors that contribute to it through inclusive policies and practices that promote equal opportunities and social integration for all members of society.
The social_Exclusion_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Marginalisation and Deviance' Causal relation: {Deviance, Stigma} → marginalises → {Social_Exclusion, Minority_Group} Semantical explanation of social_Exclusion_ID000005: Social exclusion is a complex and multidimensional process and outcome where individuals or groups are prevented from fully participating in the economic, social, political, and cultural life of the society in which they are located due to a combination of multiple and often intersecting deprivations. These deprivations can include lack of adequate income and resources, limited access to employment, education, healthcare, housing, and social support networks, as well as experiences of discrimination, marginalisation, and a lack of voice or power in decision-making processes that affect their lives. Social exclusion can lead to feelings of isolation, alienation, and a diminished sense of belonging, hindering individuals' ability to exercise their rights, fulfill their potential, and participate as full and valued members of society. Addressing social exclusion requires tackling the various interconnected factors that contribute to it through inclusive policies and practices that promote equal opportunities and social integration for all members of society.
The social_Exclusion_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Marginalisation Mechanisms' Causal relation: {Neoliberalism, Structural_Functionalism} → marginalises → {Social_Exclusion, Relative_Deprivation} Semantical explanation of social_Exclusion_ID000006: Social exclusion is a complex and multidimensional process and outcome where individuals or groups are prevented from fully participating in the economic, social, political, and cultural life of the society in which they are located due to a combination of multiple and often intersecting deprivations. These deprivations can include lack of adequate income and resources, limited access to employment, education, healthcare, housing, and social support networks, as well as experiences of discrimination, marginalisation, and a lack of voice or power in decision-making processes that affect their lives. Social exclusion can lead to feelings of isolation, alienation, and a diminished sense of belonging, hindering individuals' ability to exercise their rights, fulfill their potential, and participate as full and valued members of society. Addressing social exclusion requires tackling the various interconnected factors that contribute to it through inclusive policies and practices that promote equal opportunities and social integration for all members of society.
The social_Exclusion_ID000007 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Stigmatisation and Identity Management' Causal relation: {Stigma, Labeling_Theory} → stigmatises → {Identity, Social_Exclusion} Semantical explanation of social_Exclusion_ID000007: Social exclusion is a complex and multidimensional process and outcome where individuals or groups are prevented from fully participating in the economic, social, political, and cultural life of the society in which they are located due to a combination of multiple and often intersecting deprivations. These deprivations can include lack of adequate income and resources, limited access to employment, education, healthcare, housing, and social support networks, as well as experiences of discrimination, marginalisation, and a lack of voice or power in decision-making processes that affect their lives. Social exclusion can lead to feelings of isolation, alienation, and a diminished sense of belonging, hindering individuals' ability to exercise their rights, fulfill their potential, and participate as full and valued members of society. Addressing social exclusion requires tackling the various interconnected factors that contribute to it through inclusive policies and practices that promote equal opportunities and social integration for all members of society.
The social_Exclusion_ID000008 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Urban Gentrification Displacement' Causal relation: {Gentrification, Urban_Renewal} → gentrifies → {Working_Class, Social_Exclusion} Semantical explanation of social_Exclusion_ID000008: Social exclusion is a complex and multidimensional process and outcome where individuals or groups are prevented from fully participating in the economic, social, political, and cultural life of the society in which they are located due to a combination of multiple and often intersecting deprivations. These deprivations can include lack of adequate income and resources, limited access to employment, education, healthcare, housing, and social support networks, as well as experiences of discrimination, marginalisation, and a lack of voice or power in decision-making processes that affect their lives. Social exclusion can lead to feelings of isolation, alienation, and a diminished sense of belonging, hindering individuals' ability to exercise their rights, fulfill their potential, and participate as full and valued members of society. Addressing social exclusion requires tackling the various interconnected factors that contribute to it through inclusive policies and practices that promote equal opportunities and social integration for all members of society.
The social_Inequality_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Capitalist Production and Class Formation' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Mass_Production, Industrialism} → stratifies → {Working_Class, Bourgeoisie, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of social_Inequality_ID000001: Social inequality refers to a condition within a society in which its members have significantly different amounts of wealth, income, prestige, power, or other valued resources and opportunities. This unequal distribution can be based on various social categories such as social class, race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, and disability, often resulting in hierarchical arrangements where some groups have more access to resources and privileges than others. Social inequality is a fundamental topic of study in sociology, with researchers examining its causes, consequences, and the ways in which it is maintained and challenged over time. It can manifest in various forms, including economic disparities, differences in social status and respect, and unequal access to political influence and decision-making power.
The social_Inequality_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Corporate Crime and Organisational Deviance' Causal relation: {White-collar_Crime, Corporate_Crime} → influencesHistorically → {Economic_System, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of social_Inequality_ID000002: Social inequality refers to a condition within a society in which its members have significantly different amounts of wealth, income, prestige, power, or other valued resources and opportunities. This unequal distribution can be based on various social categories such as social class, race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, and disability, often resulting in hierarchical arrangements where some groups have more access to resources and privileges than others. Social inequality is a fundamental topic of study in sociology, with researchers examining its causes, consequences, and the ways in which it is maintained and challenged over time. It can manifest in various forms, including economic disparities, differences in social status and respect, and unequal access to political influence and decision-making power.
The social_Inequality_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Corporate Power and Economic Concentration' Causal relation: {Multinational_Corporation, Monopoly} → controls → {Economic_System, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of social_Inequality_ID000003: Social inequality refers to a condition within a society in which its members have significantly different amounts of wealth, income, prestige, power, or other valued resources and opportunities. This unequal distribution can be based on various social categories such as social class, race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, and disability, often resulting in hierarchical arrangements where some groups have more access to resources and privileges than others. Social inequality is a fundamental topic of study in sociology, with researchers examining its causes, consequences, and the ways in which it is maintained and challenged over time. It can manifest in various forms, including economic disparities, differences in social status and respect, and unequal access to political influence and decision-making power.
The social_Inequality_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Digital Divide and Information Inequality' Causal relation: {Internet, Relative_Poverty} → stratifies → {Social_Inequality, Education} Semantical explanation of social_Inequality_ID000004: Social inequality refers to a condition within a society in which its members have significantly different amounts of wealth, income, prestige, power, or other valued resources and opportunities. This unequal distribution can be based on various social categories such as social class, race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, and disability, often resulting in hierarchical arrangements where some groups have more access to resources and privileges than others. Social inequality is a fundamental topic of study in sociology, with researchers examining its causes, consequences, and the ways in which it is maintained and challenged over time. It can manifest in various forms, including economic disparities, differences in social status and respect, and unequal access to political influence and decision-making power.
The social_Inequality_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Inequality and Migration' Causal relation: {Economic_System, Outsourcing} → causallyInfluencedBy → {Migration, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of social_Inequality_ID000005: Social inequality refers to a condition within a society in which its members have significantly different amounts of wealth, income, prestige, power, or other valued resources and opportunities. This unequal distribution can be based on various social categories such as social class, race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, and disability, often resulting in hierarchical arrangements where some groups have more access to resources and privileges than others. Social inequality is a fundamental topic of study in sociology, with researchers examining its causes, consequences, and the ways in which it is maintained and challenged over time. It can manifest in various forms, including economic disparities, differences in social status and respect, and unequal access to political influence and decision-making power.
The social_Inequality_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Systems and Social Stratification' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Class_System} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of social_Inequality_ID000006: Social inequality refers to a condition within a society in which its members have significantly different amounts of wealth, income, prestige, power, or other valued resources and opportunities. This unequal distribution can be based on various social categories such as social class, race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, and disability, often resulting in hierarchical arrangements where some groups have more access to resources and privileges than others. Social inequality is a fundamental topic of study in sociology, with researchers examining its causes, consequences, and the ways in which it is maintained and challenged over time. It can manifest in various forms, including economic disparities, differences in social status and respect, and unequal access to political influence and decision-making power.
The social_Inequality_ID000007 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Gender Stratification and Social Inequality' Causal relation: {Gender_Stratification, Patriarchy} → stratifies → {Gender_Inequality, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of social_Inequality_ID000007: Social inequality refers to a condition within a society in which its members have significantly different amounts of wealth, income, prestige, power, or other valued resources and opportunities. This unequal distribution can be based on various social categories such as social class, race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, and disability, often resulting in hierarchical arrangements where some groups have more access to resources and privileges than others. Social inequality is a fundamental topic of study in sociology, with researchers examining its causes, consequences, and the ways in which it is maintained and challenged over time. It can manifest in various forms, including economic disparities, differences in social status and respect, and unequal access to political influence and decision-making power.
The social_Inequality_ID000008 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'State Welfare and Social Redistribution' Causal relation: {State, Healthcare} → provides → {Social_Inequality, Poverty} Semantical explanation of social_Inequality_ID000008: Social inequality refers to a condition within a society in which its members have significantly different amounts of wealth, income, prestige, power, or other valued resources and opportunities. This unequal distribution can be based on various social categories such as social class, race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, and disability, often resulting in hierarchical arrangements where some groups have more access to resources and privileges than others. Social inequality is a fundamental topic of study in sociology, with researchers examining its causes, consequences, and the ways in which it is maintained and challenged over time. It can manifest in various forms, including economic disparities, differences in social status and respect, and unequal access to political influence and decision-making power.
The social_Inequality_ID000009 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Status Group Competition' Causal relation: {Status_Group, Ethnic_Group} → competesWith → {Prestige, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of social_Inequality_ID000009: Social inequality refers to a condition within a society in which its members have significantly different amounts of wealth, income, prestige, power, or other valued resources and opportunities. This unequal distribution can be based on various social categories such as social class, race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, and disability, often resulting in hierarchical arrangements where some groups have more access to resources and privileges than others. Social inequality is a fundamental topic of study in sociology, with researchers examining its causes, consequences, and the ways in which it is maintained and challenged over time. It can manifest in various forms, including economic disparities, differences in social status and respect, and unequal access to political influence and decision-making power.
The social_Institution_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Control and Social Regulation' Causal relation: {Social_Institution, Law} → controls → {Social_Control, Formal_Social_Control} Semantical explanation of social_Institution_ID000001: Social Institutions represent complex, enduring, and organised sets of norms, values, statuses, roles, and groups that are established and accepted as fundamental components of a society's structure, primarily organised to meet basic human needs and perform essential societal functions. These major spheres of social life, such as the family, education, religion, government, and the economy, provide a framework for social interaction, guide individual and group behaviour, and contribute to the overall stability and continuity of society. Each institution has its own specific purposes, functions, and established ways of operating, and they are interconnected, influencing and being influenced by one another. Sociologists study social institutions to understand how they are structured, how they function, and how they evolve over time, as well as their impact on individuals and the perpetuation of social inequalities within a society.
The social_Institution_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Institutionalisation Processes' Causal relation: {Social_Institution, Formal_Organisation} → institutionalises → {Social_Structure, Organisation} Semantical explanation of social_Institution_ID000002: Social Institutions represent complex, enduring, and organised sets of norms, values, statuses, roles, and groups that are established and accepted as fundamental components of a society's structure, primarily organised to meet basic human needs and perform essential societal functions. These major spheres of social life, such as the family, education, religion, government, and the economy, provide a framework for social interaction, guide individual and group behaviour, and contribute to the overall stability and continuity of society. Each institution has its own specific purposes, functions, and established ways of operating, and they are interconnected, influencing and being influenced by one another. Sociologists study social institutions to understand how they are structured, how they function, and how they evolve over time, as well as their impact on individuals and the perpetuation of social inequalities within a society.
The social_Institution_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Institutions Control Behaviour' Causal relation: {Social_Institution} → hasInfluence → {Social_Control} Semantical explanation of social_Institution_ID000003: Social Institutions represent complex, enduring, and organised sets of norms, values, statuses, roles, and groups that are established and accepted as fundamental components of a society's structure, primarily organised to meet basic human needs and perform essential societal functions. These major spheres of social life, such as the family, education, religion, government, and the economy, provide a framework for social interaction, guide individual and group behaviour, and contribute to the overall stability and continuity of society. Each institution has its own specific purposes, functions, and established ways of operating, and they are interconnected, influencing and being influenced by one another. Sociologists study social institutions to understand how they are structured, how they function, and how they evolve over time, as well as their impact on individuals and the perpetuation of social inequalities within a society.
The social_Interaction_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Digital Communication and Social Transformation' Causal relation: {Internet, Cyberspace} → digitalises → {Social_Interaction, Social_Cohesion} Semantical explanation of social_Interaction_ID000001: Social interaction is the fundamental process by which people act and react in relation to others, involving communication, mutual influence, and the creation of shared meanings and social bonds. It occurs at all levels of social life, from brief encounters between strangers to long-term relationships within families and close-knit groups, and in formal settings like workplaces and organisations as well as informal settings like social gatherings. Social interaction can take various forms, including verbal communication, nonverbal cues such as gestures and facial expressions, and the exchange of symbols and meanings. It is through social interaction that individuals develop their sense of self, learn social norms, establish relationships, and collectively construct social reality. The study of social interaction is a core focus of microsociology, aiming to understand the patterns and dynamics of everyday social life.
The social_Interaction_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Primary Group Social Interaction' Causal relation: {Primary_Group, Small_Group} → communicatesWith → {Social_Interaction, Dyad} Semantical explanation of social_Interaction_ID000002: Social interaction is the fundamental process by which people act and react in relation to others, involving communication, mutual influence, and the creation of shared meanings and social bonds. It occurs at all levels of social life, from brief encounters between strangers to long-term relationships within families and close-knit groups, and in formal settings like workplaces and organisations as well as informal settings like social gatherings. Social interaction can take various forms, including verbal communication, nonverbal cues such as gestures and facial expressions, and the exchange of symbols and meanings. It is through social interaction that individuals develop their sense of self, learn social norms, establish relationships, and collectively construct social reality. The study of social interaction is a core focus of microsociology, aiming to understand the patterns and dynamics of everyday social life.
The social_Interaction_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Network Formation' Causal relation: {Social_Network, Internet} → networks → {Social_Interaction, Peer_Group} Semantical explanation of social_Interaction_ID000003: Social interaction is the fundamental process by which people act and react in relation to others, involving communication, mutual influence, and the creation of shared meanings and social bonds. It occurs at all levels of social life, from brief encounters between strangers to long-term relationships within families and close-knit groups, and in formal settings like workplaces and organisations as well as informal settings like social gatherings. Social interaction can take various forms, including verbal communication, nonverbal cues such as gestures and facial expressions, and the exchange of symbols and meanings. It is through social interaction that individuals develop their sense of self, learn social norms, establish relationships, and collectively construct social reality. The study of social interaction is a core focus of microsociology, aiming to understand the patterns and dynamics of everyday social life.
The social_Mobility_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Community Mobilisation and Local Development' Causal relation: {Group, Social_Mobility} → mobilises → {Social_Change, Social_Structure} Semantical explanation of social_Mobility_ID000001: Social mobility refers to the movement of individuals or groups from one position to another within a society's stratification system, which is the hierarchical arrangement of social positions based on factors like wealth, income, occupation, education, and social status. This movement can be upward, representing an improvement in social standing (e.g., moving from a working-class job to a professional occupation), or downward, indicating a decline in social position (e.g., due to unemployment or business failure). Social mobility can occur within an individual's lifetime (intragenerational mobility) or across generations (intergenerational mobility, comparing the social position of children to that of their parents). The degree of social mobility in a society is often seen as an indicator of its openness and the extent to which individuals can change their social standing based on their achievements and efforts rather than being limited by their ascribed status at birth.
The social_Mobility_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Reproduction and Social Inequality' Causal relation: {Cultural_Capital, Family} → reproduces → {Social_Class, Social_Mobility} Semantical explanation of social_Mobility_ID000002: Social mobility refers to the movement of individuals or groups from one position to another within a society's stratification system, which is the hierarchical arrangement of social positions based on factors like wealth, income, occupation, education, and social status. This movement can be upward, representing an improvement in social standing (e.g., moving from a working-class job to a professional occupation), or downward, indicating a decline in social position (e.g., due to unemployment or business failure). Social mobility can occur within an individual's lifetime (intragenerational mobility) or across generations (intergenerational mobility, comparing the social position of children to that of their parents). The degree of social mobility in a society is often seen as an indicator of its openness and the extent to which individuals can change their social standing based on their achievements and efforts rather than being limited by their ascribed status at birth.
The social_Mobility_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Education Educates Citizens' Causal relation: {Education} → educates → {Social_Mobility} Semantical explanation of social_Mobility_ID000003: Social mobility refers to the movement of individuals or groups from one position to another within a society's stratification system, which is the hierarchical arrangement of social positions based on factors like wealth, income, occupation, education, and social status. This movement can be upward, representing an improvement in social standing (e.g., moving from a working-class job to a professional occupation), or downward, indicating a decline in social position (e.g., due to unemployment or business failure). Social mobility can occur within an individual's lifetime (intragenerational mobility) or across generations (intergenerational mobility, comparing the social position of children to that of their parents). The degree of social mobility in a society is often seen as an indicator of its openness and the extent to which individuals can change their social standing based on their achievements and efforts rather than being limited by their ascribed status at birth.
The social_Mobility_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Stratification and Opportunity' Causal relation: {Education, Tracking} → stratifies → {Social_Class, Social_Mobility} Semantical explanation of social_Mobility_ID000004: Social mobility refers to the movement of individuals or groups from one position to another within a society's stratification system, which is the hierarchical arrangement of social positions based on factors like wealth, income, occupation, education, and social status. This movement can be upward, representing an improvement in social standing (e.g., moving from a working-class job to a professional occupation), or downward, indicating a decline in social position (e.g., due to unemployment or business failure). Social mobility can occur within an individual's lifetime (intragenerational mobility) or across generations (intergenerational mobility, comparing the social position of children to that of their parents). The degree of social mobility in a society is often seen as an indicator of its openness and the extent to which individuals can change their social standing based on their achievements and efforts rather than being limited by their ascribed status at birth.
The social_Mobility_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Systems and Social Mobility' Causal relation: {Education, Achieved_Status} → influencesHistorically → {Social_Mobility, Class_Consciousness} Semantical explanation of social_Mobility_ID000005: Social mobility refers to the movement of individuals or groups from one position to another within a society's stratification system, which is the hierarchical arrangement of social positions based on factors like wealth, income, occupation, education, and social status. This movement can be upward, representing an improvement in social standing (e.g., moving from a working-class job to a professional occupation), or downward, indicating a decline in social position (e.g., due to unemployment or business failure). Social mobility can occur within an individual's lifetime (intragenerational mobility) or across generations (intergenerational mobility, comparing the social position of children to that of their parents). The degree of social mobility in a society is often seen as an indicator of its openness and the extent to which individuals can change their social standing based on their achievements and efforts rather than being limited by their ascribed status at birth.
The social_Mobility_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Systems and Social Mobility' Causal relation: {Education, Cultural_Capital} → educates → {Social_Mobility, Social_Class} Semantical explanation of social_Mobility_ID000006: Social mobility refers to the movement of individuals or groups from one position to another within a society's stratification system, which is the hierarchical arrangement of social positions based on factors like wealth, income, occupation, education, and social status. This movement can be upward, representing an improvement in social standing (e.g., moving from a working-class job to a professional occupation), or downward, indicating a decline in social position (e.g., due to unemployment or business failure). Social mobility can occur within an individual's lifetime (intragenerational mobility) or across generations (intergenerational mobility, comparing the social position of children to that of their parents). The degree of social mobility in a society is often seen as an indicator of its openness and the extent to which individuals can change their social standing based on their achievements and efforts rather than being limited by their ascribed status at birth.
The social_Movement_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Civil Rights Advocacy' Causal relation: {Affirmative_Action, Political_Action_Committee_(PAC)} → advocates → {Minority_Group, Social_Movement} Semantical explanation of social_Movement_ID000001: A social movement encompasses collective attempts by a group of people to further a common interest or secure a shared goal through organised action that typically takes place outside the sphere of established political institutions and conventional channels. These movements often arise in response to perceived social, economic, or political grievances and seek to bring about or resist social change, existing in a dynamic relationship, often one of conflict, with organisations or power structures whose objectives and outlook they frequently oppose. Social movements can vary widely in their goals, tactics, organisational structures, and the scale of change they aim to achieve, ranging from advocating for specific policy reforms to seeking fundamental transformations in societal norms and values. While they operate outside of formal political systems, successful social movements can sometimes influence policy and, if they manage to gain significant power and become institutionalised, may evolve into formal organisations or even political parties.
The social_Movement_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Collective Political Resistance' Causal relation: {Social_Movement, Labour_Union} → protests → {Politics, Social_Change} Semantical explanation of social_Movement_ID000002: A social movement encompasses collective attempts by a group of people to further a common interest or secure a shared goal through organised action that typically takes place outside the sphere of established political institutions and conventional channels. These movements often arise in response to perceived social, economic, or political grievances and seek to bring about or resist social change, existing in a dynamic relationship, often one of conflict, with organisations or power structures whose objectives and outlook they frequently oppose. Social movements can vary widely in their goals, tactics, organisational structures, and the scale of change they aim to achieve, ranging from advocating for specific policy reforms to seeking fundamental transformations in societal norms and values. While they operate outside of formal political systems, successful social movements can sometimes influence policy and, if they manage to gain significant power and become institutionalised, may evolve into formal organisations or even political parties.
The social_Movement_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Democracy and Civic Participation' Causal relation: {Democracy, Politics} → influencesHistorically → {Social_Movement, Collective_Behaviour} Semantical explanation of social_Movement_ID000003: A social movement encompasses collective attempts by a group of people to further a common interest or secure a shared goal through organised action that typically takes place outside the sphere of established political institutions and conventional channels. These movements often arise in response to perceived social, economic, or political grievances and seek to bring about or resist social change, existing in a dynamic relationship, often one of conflict, with organisations or power structures whose objectives and outlook they frequently oppose. Social movements can vary widely in their goals, tactics, organisational structures, and the scale of change they aim to achieve, ranging from advocating for specific policy reforms to seeking fundamental transformations in societal norms and values. While they operate outside of formal political systems, successful social movements can sometimes influence policy and, if they manage to gain significant power and become institutionalised, may evolve into formal organisations or even political parties.
The social_Movement_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Resource Mobilisation and Social Movements' Causal relation: {Resource_Mobilisation, Social_Network} → mobilises → {Social_Movement, Collective_Behaviour} Semantical explanation of social_Movement_ID000004: A social movement encompasses collective attempts by a group of people to further a common interest or secure a shared goal through organised action that typically takes place outside the sphere of established political institutions and conventional channels. These movements often arise in response to perceived social, economic, or political grievances and seek to bring about or resist social change, existing in a dynamic relationship, often one of conflict, with organisations or power structures whose objectives and outlook they frequently oppose. Social movements can vary widely in their goals, tactics, organisational structures, and the scale of change they aim to achieve, ranging from advocating for specific policy reforms to seeking fundamental transformations in societal norms and values. While they operate outside of formal political systems, successful social movements can sometimes influence policy and, if they manage to gain significant power and become institutionalised, may evolve into formal organisations or even political parties.
The social_Movement_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Resource Mobilisation for Collective Action' Causal relation: {Resource_Mobilisation, Political_Action_Committee_(PAC)} → mobilises → {Social_Movement, Strike} Semantical explanation of social_Movement_ID000005: A social movement encompasses collective attempts by a group of people to further a common interest or secure a shared goal through organised action that typically takes place outside the sphere of established political institutions and conventional channels. These movements often arise in response to perceived social, economic, or political grievances and seek to bring about or resist social change, existing in a dynamic relationship, often one of conflict, with organisations or power structures whose objectives and outlook they frequently oppose. Social movements can vary widely in their goals, tactics, organisational structures, and the scale of change they aim to achieve, ranging from advocating for specific policy reforms to seeking fundamental transformations in societal norms and values. While they operate outside of formal political systems, successful social movements can sometimes influence policy and, if they manage to gain significant power and become institutionalised, may evolve into formal organisations or even political parties.
The social_Movement_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Resource Mobilisation Mobilises Movements' Causal relation: {Resource_Mobilisation} → mobilises → {Social_Movement} Semantical explanation of social_Movement_ID000006: A social movement encompasses collective attempts by a group of people to further a common interest or secure a shared goal through organised action that typically takes place outside the sphere of established political institutions and conventional channels. These movements often arise in response to perceived social, economic, or political grievances and seek to bring about or resist social change, existing in a dynamic relationship, often one of conflict, with organisations or power structures whose objectives and outlook they frequently oppose. Social movements can vary widely in their goals, tactics, organisational structures, and the scale of change they aim to achieve, ranging from advocating for specific policy reforms to seeking fundamental transformations in societal norms and values. While they operate outside of formal political systems, successful social movements can sometimes influence policy and, if they manage to gain significant power and become institutionalised, may evolve into formal organisations or even political parties.
The social_Movement_ID000007 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Coordination and Conflict Resolution' Causal relation: {Negotiation, Conflict_Perspective} → coordinates → {Social_Movement, Social_Cohesion} Semantical explanation of social_Movement_ID000007: A social movement encompasses collective attempts by a group of people to further a common interest or secure a shared goal through organised action that typically takes place outside the sphere of established political institutions and conventional channels. These movements often arise in response to perceived social, economic, or political grievances and seek to bring about or resist social change, existing in a dynamic relationship, often one of conflict, with organisations or power structures whose objectives and outlook they frequently oppose. Social movements can vary widely in their goals, tactics, organisational structures, and the scale of change they aim to achieve, ranging from advocating for specific policy reforms to seeking fundamental transformations in societal norms and values. While they operate outside of formal political systems, successful social movements can sometimes influence policy and, if they manage to gain significant power and become institutionalised, may evolve into formal organisations or even political parties.
The social_Movement_ID000008 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Movement Mobilises Change' Causal relation: {Social_Movement} → mobilises → {Social_Change} Semantical explanation of social_Movement_ID000008: A social movement encompasses collective attempts by a group of people to further a common interest or secure a shared goal through organised action that typically takes place outside the sphere of established political institutions and conventional channels. These movements often arise in response to perceived social, economic, or political grievances and seek to bring about or resist social change, existing in a dynamic relationship, often one of conflict, with organisations or power structures whose objectives and outlook they frequently oppose. Social movements can vary widely in their goals, tactics, organisational structures, and the scale of change they aim to achieve, ranging from advocating for specific policy reforms to seeking fundamental transformations in societal norms and values. While they operate outside of formal political systems, successful social movements can sometimes influence policy and, if they manage to gain significant power and become institutionalised, may evolve into formal organisations or even political parties.
The social_Movement_ID000009 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Movement Organisation' Causal relation: {Social_Movement, Resource_Mobilisation} → coordinates → {Coalition, Political_Action_Committee_(PAC)} Semantical explanation of social_Movement_ID000009: A social movement encompasses collective attempts by a group of people to further a common interest or secure a shared goal through organised action that typically takes place outside the sphere of established political institutions and conventional channels. These movements often arise in response to perceived social, economic, or political grievances and seek to bring about or resist social change, existing in a dynamic relationship, often one of conflict, with organisations or power structures whose objectives and outlook they frequently oppose. Social movements can vary widely in their goals, tactics, organisational structures, and the scale of change they aim to achieve, ranging from advocating for specific policy reforms to seeking fundamental transformations in societal norms and values. While they operate outside of formal political systems, successful social movements can sometimes influence policy and, if they manage to gain significant power and become institutionalised, may evolve into formal organisations or even political parties.
The social_Movement_ID000010 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Movement Political Impact' Causal relation: {Social_Movement, New_Social_Movement} → hasInfluence → {Political_System, Democracy} Semantical explanation of social_Movement_ID000010: A social movement encompasses collective attempts by a group of people to further a common interest or secure a shared goal through organised action that typically takes place outside the sphere of established political institutions and conventional channels. These movements often arise in response to perceived social, economic, or political grievances and seek to bring about or resist social change, existing in a dynamic relationship, often one of conflict, with organisations or power structures whose objectives and outlook they frequently oppose. Social movements can vary widely in their goals, tactics, organisational structures, and the scale of change they aim to achieve, ranging from advocating for specific policy reforms to seeking fundamental transformations in societal norms and values. While they operate outside of formal political systems, successful social movements can sometimes influence policy and, if they manage to gain significant power and become institutionalised, may evolve into formal organisations or even political parties.
The social_Movement_ID000011 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Movements and Collective Action' Causal relation: {Social_Movement, Collective_Behaviour} → mobilises → {Politics, Social_Change} Semantical explanation of social_Movement_ID000011: A social movement encompasses collective attempts by a group of people to further a common interest or secure a shared goal through organised action that typically takes place outside the sphere of established political institutions and conventional channels. These movements often arise in response to perceived social, economic, or political grievances and seek to bring about or resist social change, existing in a dynamic relationship, often one of conflict, with organisations or power structures whose objectives and outlook they frequently oppose. Social movements can vary widely in their goals, tactics, organisational structures, and the scale of change they aim to achieve, ranging from advocating for specific policy reforms to seeking fundamental transformations in societal norms and values. While they operate outside of formal political systems, successful social movements can sometimes influence policy and, if they manage to gain significant power and become institutionalised, may evolve into formal organisations or even political parties.
The social_Movement_ID000012 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Movements and Political Challenge' Causal relation: {Social_Movement, Resource_Mobilisation} → protests → {Political_System, Government} Semantical explanation of social_Movement_ID000012: A social movement encompasses collective attempts by a group of people to further a common interest or secure a shared goal through organised action that typically takes place outside the sphere of established political institutions and conventional channels. These movements often arise in response to perceived social, economic, or political grievances and seek to bring about or resist social change, existing in a dynamic relationship, often one of conflict, with organisations or power structures whose objectives and outlook they frequently oppose. Social movements can vary widely in their goals, tactics, organisational structures, and the scale of change they aim to achieve, ranging from advocating for specific policy reforms to seeking fundamental transformations in societal norms and values. While they operate outside of formal political systems, successful social movements can sometimes influence policy and, if they manage to gain significant power and become institutionalised, may evolve into formal organisations or even political parties.
The social_Movement_ID000013 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Network Mobilisation and Collective Action' Causal relation: {Social_Network, Network} → mobilises → {Collective_Behaviour, Social_Movement} Semantical explanation of social_Movement_ID000013: A social movement encompasses collective attempts by a group of people to further a common interest or secure a shared goal through organised action that typically takes place outside the sphere of established political institutions and conventional channels. These movements often arise in response to perceived social, economic, or political grievances and seek to bring about or resist social change, existing in a dynamic relationship, often one of conflict, with organisations or power structures whose objectives and outlook they frequently oppose. Social movements can vary widely in their goals, tactics, organisational structures, and the scale of change they aim to achieve, ranging from advocating for specific policy reforms to seeking fundamental transformations in societal norms and values. While they operate outside of formal political systems, successful social movements can sometimes influence policy and, if they manage to gain significant power and become institutionalised, may evolve into formal organisations or even political parties.
The social_Movement_ID000014 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Youth Mobilisation and Social Change' Causal relation: {Youth_Culture, Social_Movement} → mobilises → {Social_Change, Culture} Semantical explanation of social_Movement_ID000014: A social movement encompasses collective attempts by a group of people to further a common interest or secure a shared goal through organised action that typically takes place outside the sphere of established political institutions and conventional channels. These movements often arise in response to perceived social, economic, or political grievances and seek to bring about or resist social change, existing in a dynamic relationship, often one of conflict, with organisations or power structures whose objectives and outlook they frequently oppose. Social movements can vary widely in their goals, tactics, organisational structures, and the scale of change they aim to achieve, ranging from advocating for specific policy reforms to seeking fundamental transformations in societal norms and values. While they operate outside of formal political systems, successful social movements can sometimes influence policy and, if they manage to gain significant power and become institutionalised, may evolve into formal organisations or even political parties.
The social_Network_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Peer Group Socialisation and Identity Formation' Causal relation: {Peer_Group, Social_Network} → socialises → {Identity, Socialisation} Semantical explanation of social_Network_ID000001: A social network refers to a series of interconnected social relationships that links an individual directly to other people and, through them, indirectly to an even wider circle of individuals, forming a complex web of social connections. These networks can be based on various types of relationships, including friendship, kinship, work affiliations, shared interests, or online interactions, and they facilitate the flow of information, resources, social support, and influence among the individuals within them. The structure and characteristics of an individual's social network, such as its size, density, and the strength of its ties, can have significant implications for their opportunities, well-being, and social capital, which is the collective benefit derived from social connections and relationships.
The social_Network_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Professional Network Formation' Causal relation: {Professional_Criminal, Entrepreneur} → networks → {Social_Network, Social_Cohesion} Semantical explanation of social_Network_ID000002: A social network refers to a series of interconnected social relationships that links an individual directly to other people and, through them, indirectly to an even wider circle of individuals, forming a complex web of social connections. These networks can be based on various types of relationships, including friendship, kinship, work affiliations, shared interests, or online interactions, and they facilitate the flow of information, resources, social support, and influence among the individuals within them. The structure and characteristics of an individual's social network, such as its size, density, and the strength of its ties, can have significant implications for their opportunities, well-being, and social capital, which is the collective benefit derived from social connections and relationships.
The social_Network_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Resource Mobilisation and Social Movements' Causal relation: {Resource_Mobilisation, Social_Network} → mobilises → {Social_Movement, Collective_Behaviour} Semantical explanation of social_Network_ID000003: A social network refers to a series of interconnected social relationships that links an individual directly to other people and, through them, indirectly to an even wider circle of individuals, forming a complex web of social connections. These networks can be based on various types of relationships, including friendship, kinship, work affiliations, shared interests, or online interactions, and they facilitate the flow of information, resources, social support, and influence among the individuals within them. The structure and characteristics of an individual's social network, such as its size, density, and the strength of its ties, can have significant implications for their opportunities, well-being, and social capital, which is the collective benefit derived from social connections and relationships.
The social_Network_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Media and Network Society' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Network} → influencesHistorically → {Identity, Social_Network} Semantical explanation of social_Network_ID000004: A social network refers to a series of interconnected social relationships that links an individual directly to other people and, through them, indirectly to an even wider circle of individuals, forming a complex web of social connections. These networks can be based on various types of relationships, including friendship, kinship, work affiliations, shared interests, or online interactions, and they facilitate the flow of information, resources, social support, and influence among the individuals within them. The structure and characteristics of an individual's social network, such as its size, density, and the strength of its ties, can have significant implications for their opportunities, well-being, and social capital, which is the collective benefit derived from social connections and relationships.
The social_Network_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Network Formation' Causal relation: {Social_Network, Internet} → networks → {Social_Interaction, Peer_Group} Semantical explanation of social_Network_ID000005: A social network refers to a series of interconnected social relationships that links an individual directly to other people and, through them, indirectly to an even wider circle of individuals, forming a complex web of social connections. These networks can be based on various types of relationships, including friendship, kinship, work affiliations, shared interests, or online interactions, and they facilitate the flow of information, resources, social support, and influence among the individuals within them. The structure and characteristics of an individual's social network, such as its size, density, and the strength of its ties, can have significant implications for their opportunities, well-being, and social capital, which is the collective benefit derived from social connections and relationships.
The social_Network_ID000006 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Network Mobilisation and Collective Action' Causal relation: {Social_Network, Network} → mobilises → {Collective_Behaviour, Social_Movement} Semantical explanation of social_Network_ID000006: A social network refers to a series of interconnected social relationships that links an individual directly to other people and, through them, indirectly to an even wider circle of individuals, forming a complex web of social connections. These networks can be based on various types of relationships, including friendship, kinship, work affiliations, shared interests, or online interactions, and they facilitate the flow of information, resources, social support, and influence among the individuals within them. The structure and characteristics of an individual's social network, such as its size, density, and the strength of its ties, can have significant implications for their opportunities, well-being, and social capital, which is the collective benefit derived from social connections and relationships.
The social_Network_ID000007 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Network Mobilises Resources' Causal relation: {Social_Network} → mobilises → {Collective_Behaviour} Semantical explanation of social_Network_ID000007: A social network refers to a series of interconnected social relationships that links an individual directly to other people and, through them, indirectly to an even wider circle of individuals, forming a complex web of social connections. These networks can be based on various types of relationships, including friendship, kinship, work affiliations, shared interests, or online interactions, and they facilitate the flow of information, resources, social support, and influence among the individuals within them. The structure and characteristics of an individual's social network, such as its size, density, and the strength of its ties, can have significant implications for their opportunities, well-being, and social capital, which is the collective benefit derived from social connections and relationships.
The social_Role_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Influence and Identity Formation' Causal relation: {Culture, Value} → hasInfluence → {Identity, Social_Role} Semantical explanation of social_Role_ID000001: Social_Role represents the organised system of behavioural expectations, positions, and identities that individuals occupy within social structures and through which social interaction is organised and regulated. This category encompasses the fundamental mechanisms through which societies organise human behaviour and social relationships, including both positions that individuals achieve through their actions and those that are ascribed based on characteristics beyond their control. The concept includes the hierarchical dimension of social positions through status systems and the specialised behavioural expectations associated with particular social positions. Gender roles represent culturally defined expectations based on sex categories, while the sick role exemplifies how societies organise responses to illness and health conditions. Master status refers to dominant identity categories that override other social positions in social interaction. The category captures how societies create and maintain social order through the assignment and performance of differentiated roles that coordinate individual behaviour with collective needs and expectations. These roles serve as bridges between individual identity and social structure, providing frameworks for social interaction, identity formation, and the reproduction of social patterns across time and social contexts.
The social_Role_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Global Influence and Cultural Exchange' Causal relation: {Global_Village, Internet} → hasInfluence → {Culture, Social_Change, Social_Role} Semantical explanation of social_Role_ID000002: Social_Role represents the organised system of behavioural expectations, positions, and identities that individuals occupy within social structures and through which social interaction is organised and regulated. This category encompasses the fundamental mechanisms through which societies organise human behaviour and social relationships, including both positions that individuals achieve through their actions and those that are ascribed based on characteristics beyond their control. The concept includes the hierarchical dimension of social positions through status systems and the specialised behavioural expectations associated with particular social positions. Gender roles represent culturally defined expectations based on sex categories, while the sick role exemplifies how societies organise responses to illness and health conditions. Master status refers to dominant identity categories that override other social positions in social interaction. The category captures how societies create and maintain social order through the assignment and performance of differentiated roles that coordinate individual behaviour with collective needs and expectations. These roles serve as bridges between individual identity and social structure, providing frameworks for social interaction, identity formation, and the reproduction of social patterns across time and social contexts.
The social_Role_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Resocialisation and Identity Change' Causal relation: {Resocialisation, Total_Institution} → governs → {Identity, Social_Role} Semantical explanation of social_Role_ID000003: Social_Role represents the organised system of behavioural expectations, positions, and identities that individuals occupy within social structures and through which social interaction is organised and regulated. This category encompasses the fundamental mechanisms through which societies organise human behaviour and social relationships, including both positions that individuals achieve through their actions and those that are ascribed based on characteristics beyond their control. The concept includes the hierarchical dimension of social positions through status systems and the specialised behavioural expectations associated with particular social positions. Gender roles represent culturally defined expectations based on sex categories, while the sick role exemplifies how societies organise responses to illness and health conditions. Master status refers to dominant identity categories that override other social positions in social interaction. The category captures how societies create and maintain social order through the assignment and performance of differentiated roles that coordinate individual behaviour with collective needs and expectations. These roles serve as bridges between individual identity and social structure, providing frameworks for social interaction, identity formation, and the reproduction of social patterns across time and social contexts.
The social_Role_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Primary Socialisation and Identity Formation' Causal relation: {Primary_Socialisation, Family, Education} → socialises → {Identity, Value, Social_Role} Semantical explanation of social_Role_ID000004: Social_Role represents the organised system of behavioural expectations, positions, and identities that individuals occupy within social structures and through which social interaction is organised and regulated. This category encompasses the fundamental mechanisms through which societies organise human behaviour and social relationships, including both positions that individuals achieve through their actions and those that are ascribed based on characteristics beyond their control. The concept includes the hierarchical dimension of social positions through status systems and the specialised behavioural expectations associated with particular social positions. Gender roles represent culturally defined expectations based on sex categories, while the sick role exemplifies how societies organise responses to illness and health conditions. Master status refers to dominant identity categories that override other social positions in social interaction. The category captures how societies create and maintain social order through the assignment and performance of differentiated roles that coordinate individual behaviour with collective needs and expectations. These roles serve as bridges between individual identity and social structure, providing frameworks for social interaction, identity formation, and the reproduction of social patterns across time and social contexts.
The social_Social_Spatial_Region_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Segregation and Spatial Organisation' Causal relation: {Segregation, Social_Class} → segregates → {Urban_Ecology, Social_Social_Spatial_Region} Semantical explanation of social_Social_Spatial_Region_ID000001: Social_Social_Spatial_Region encompasses the various spatially defined areas and environments that are socially constructed, organised, and experienced as meaningful contexts for human interaction and social life. This category includes both physical and virtual spaces that have been imbued with social significance and serve as contexts for different forms of social behaviour and interaction. It covers urban formations ranging from historical city types to contemporary metropolitan areas and suburban developments, reflecting the evolution of human settlement patterns and spatial organisation. The category includes specialised spatial concepts such as defended neighborhoods, which represent territorialised social spaces, and squatter settlements, which reflect informal urban development patterns. Virtual spaces are represented through cyberspace, acknowledging the increasing importance of digital environments in contemporary social life. The public sphere represents spaces dedicated to democratic discourse and civic engagement. Back regions refer to spaces where individuals can relax social performances and behave more informally. These spatial regions are not merely physical containers but are actively constructed through social processes, carrying cultural meanings, social rules, and behavioural expectations that shape how individuals and groups interact within them.
The social_Stratification_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Capitalism Stratifies Society' Causal relation: {Capitalism} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification} Semantical explanation of social_Stratification_ID000001: Social stratification refers to the existence of structured inequalities between different groups in society in terms of their access to material or symbolic rewards, such as wealth, income, prestige, power, status, and opportunities. While some forms of social differentiation may exist in all societies, significant and enduring patterns of inequality, leading to hierarchical arrangements of social groups, tend to arise with the development of more complex, state-based systems. The most distinctive and extensively studied form of stratification in modern societies involves class divisions, based primarily on economic factors, but stratification can also occur along lines of race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, and other social categories. Sociologists examine the causes and consequences of social stratification, as well as the processes that maintain or challenge these inequalities over time.
The social_Stratification_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Class Stratification' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Economic_System} → stratifies → {Social_Class, Social_Stratification} Semantical explanation of social_Stratification_ID000002: Social stratification refers to the existence of structured inequalities between different groups in society in terms of their access to material or symbolic rewards, such as wealth, income, prestige, power, status, and opportunities. While some forms of social differentiation may exist in all societies, significant and enduring patterns of inequality, leading to hierarchical arrangements of social groups, tend to arise with the development of more complex, state-based systems. The most distinctive and extensively studied form of stratification in modern societies involves class divisions, based primarily on economic factors, but stratification can also occur along lines of race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, and other social categories. Sociologists examine the causes and consequences of social stratification, as well as the processes that maintain or challenge these inequalities over time.
The social_Stratification_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Systems and Social Stratification' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Class_System} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of social_Stratification_ID000003: Social stratification refers to the existence of structured inequalities between different groups in society in terms of their access to material or symbolic rewards, such as wealth, income, prestige, power, status, and opportunities. While some forms of social differentiation may exist in all societies, significant and enduring patterns of inequality, leading to hierarchical arrangements of social groups, tend to arise with the development of more complex, state-based systems. The most distinctive and extensively studied form of stratification in modern societies involves class divisions, based primarily on economic factors, but stratification can also occur along lines of race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, and other social categories. Sociologists examine the causes and consequences of social stratification, as well as the processes that maintain or challenge these inequalities over time.
The social_Stratification_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Stratification Process' Causal relation: {Education, Cultural_Capital} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification, Class_System} Semantical explanation of social_Stratification_ID000004: Social stratification refers to the existence of structured inequalities between different groups in society in terms of their access to material or symbolic rewards, such as wealth, income, prestige, power, status, and opportunities. While some forms of social differentiation may exist in all societies, significant and enduring patterns of inequality, leading to hierarchical arrangements of social groups, tend to arise with the development of more complex, state-based systems. The most distinctive and extensively studied form of stratification in modern societies involves class divisions, based primarily on economic factors, but stratification can also occur along lines of race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, and other social categories. Sociologists examine the causes and consequences of social stratification, as well as the processes that maintain or challenge these inequalities over time.
The social_Stratification_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Tracking Systems' Causal relation: {Tracking, Education} → segregates → {Segregation, Social_Stratification} Semantical explanation of social_Stratification_ID000005: Social stratification refers to the existence of structured inequalities between different groups in society in terms of their access to material or symbolic rewards, such as wealth, income, prestige, power, status, and opportunities. While some forms of social differentiation may exist in all societies, significant and enduring patterns of inequality, leading to hierarchical arrangements of social groups, tend to arise with the development of more complex, state-based systems. The most distinctive and extensively studied form of stratification in modern societies involves class divisions, based primarily on economic factors, but stratification can also occur along lines of race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, and other social categories. Sociologists examine the causes and consequences of social stratification, as well as the processes that maintain or challenge these inequalities over time.
The social_Stratification_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Ethnic Group Creates Stratification' Causal relation: {Ethnic_Group} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification} Semantical explanation of social_Stratification_ID000006: Social stratification refers to the existence of structured inequalities between different groups in society in terms of their access to material or symbolic rewards, such as wealth, income, prestige, power, status, and opportunities. While some forms of social differentiation may exist in all societies, significant and enduring patterns of inequality, leading to hierarchical arrangements of social groups, tend to arise with the development of more complex, state-based systems. The most distinctive and extensively studied form of stratification in modern societies involves class divisions, based primarily on economic factors, but stratification can also occur along lines of race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, and other social categories. Sociologists examine the causes and consequences of social stratification, as well as the processes that maintain or challenge these inequalities over time.
The social_Stratification_ID000007 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Higher Education Stratification' Causal relation: {Education, Cultural_Capital} → educates → {Social_Class, Social_Stratification} Semantical explanation of social_Stratification_ID000007: Social stratification refers to the existence of structured inequalities between different groups in society in terms of their access to material or symbolic rewards, such as wealth, income, prestige, power, status, and opportunities. While some forms of social differentiation may exist in all societies, significant and enduring patterns of inequality, leading to hierarchical arrangements of social groups, tend to arise with the development of more complex, state-based systems. The most distinctive and extensively studied form of stratification in modern societies involves class divisions, based primarily on economic factors, but stratification can also occur along lines of race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, and other social categories. Sociologists examine the causes and consequences of social stratification, as well as the processes that maintain or challenge these inequalities over time.
The social_Stratification_ID000008 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Racial Stratification and Social Hierarchy' Causal relation: {Racism, Ethnic_Group} → stratifies → {Social_Stratification, Social_Class} Semantical explanation of social_Stratification_ID000008: Social stratification refers to the existence of structured inequalities between different groups in society in terms of their access to material or symbolic rewards, such as wealth, income, prestige, power, status, and opportunities. While some forms of social differentiation may exist in all societies, significant and enduring patterns of inequality, leading to hierarchical arrangements of social groups, tend to arise with the development of more complex, state-based systems. The most distinctive and extensively studied form of stratification in modern societies involves class divisions, based primarily on economic factors, but stratification can also occur along lines of race, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, and other social categories. Sociologists examine the causes and consequences of social stratification, as well as the processes that maintain or challenge these inequalities over time.
The social_Structure_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Community Mobilisation and Local Development' Causal relation: {Group, Social_Mobility} → mobilises → {Social_Change, Social_Structure} Semantical explanation of social_Structure_ID000001: Social structure refers to the underlying patterns of social relationships, institutions, and social organisation that shape and constrain individuals' behaviour and interactions within a society, providing a framework for social life. It is the way in which a society is organised into predictable relationships and hierarchies based on factors such as social class, gender, race, ethnicity, age, and social institutions like the family, education, government, and the economy. Social structure is not always immediately visible but exerts a powerful influence on individuals' opportunities, experiences, and life chances. Sociologists study social structure to understand the enduring patterns of social behaviour and the ways in which society is organised at a macro level.
The social_Structure_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Influence and Social Change' Causal relation: {Culture, Value} → hasInfluence → {Social_Change, Social_Structure} Semantical explanation of social_Structure_ID000002: Social structure refers to the underlying patterns of social relationships, institutions, and social organisation that shape and constrain individuals' behaviour and interactions within a society, providing a framework for social life. It is the way in which a society is organised into predictable relationships and hierarchies based on factors such as social class, gender, race, ethnicity, age, and social institutions like the family, education, government, and the economy. Social structure is not always immediately visible but exerts a powerful influence on individuals' opportunities, experiences, and life chances. Sociologists study social structure to understand the enduring patterns of social behaviour and the ways in which society is organised at a macro level.
The social_Structure_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Coordination and Collective Action' Causal relation: {Norm, Language} → coordinates → {Collective_Behaviour, Social_Structure} Semantical explanation of social_Structure_ID000003: Social structure refers to the underlying patterns of social relationships, institutions, and social organisation that shape and constrain individuals' behaviour and interactions within a society, providing a framework for social life. It is the way in which a society is organised into predictable relationships and hierarchies based on factors such as social class, gender, race, ethnicity, age, and social institutions like the family, education, government, and the economy. Social structure is not always immediately visible but exerts a powerful influence on individuals' opportunities, experiences, and life chances. Sociologists study social structure to understand the enduring patterns of social behaviour and the ways in which society is organised at a macro level.
The social_Structure_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Institutionalisation Processes' Causal relation: {Social_Institution, Formal_Organisation} → institutionalises → {Social_Structure, Organisation} Semantical explanation of social_Structure_ID000004: Social structure refers to the underlying patterns of social relationships, institutions, and social organisation that shape and constrain individuals' behaviour and interactions within a society, providing a framework for social life. It is the way in which a society is organised into predictable relationships and hierarchies based on factors such as social class, gender, race, ethnicity, age, and social institutions like the family, education, government, and the economy. Social structure is not always immediately visible but exerts a powerful influence on individuals' opportunities, experiences, and life chances. Sociologists study social structure to understand the enduring patterns of social behaviour and the ways in which society is organised at a macro level.
The social_Structure_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Urbanisation and Social Transformation' Causal relation: {Urbanisation, Industrial_Society} → urbanises → {Urbanism, Social_Structure} Semantical explanation of social_Structure_ID000005: Social structure refers to the underlying patterns of social relationships, institutions, and social organisation that shape and constrain individuals' behaviour and interactions within a society, providing a framework for social life. It is the way in which a society is organised into predictable relationships and hierarchies based on factors such as social class, gender, race, ethnicity, age, and social institutions like the family, education, government, and the economy. Social structure is not always immediately visible but exerts a powerful influence on individuals' opportunities, experiences, and life chances. Sociologists study social structure to understand the enduring patterns of social behaviour and the ways in which society is organised at a macro level.
The socialisation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Education Socialises Individuals' Causal relation: {Education} → socialises → {Socialisation} Semantical explanation of socialisation_ID000001: Socialisation refers to the lifelong social processes through which individuals develop an awareness of social norms, values, beliefs, and behaviours of their culture and society, and achieve a distinct sense of self and identity. This process begins in early childhood with primary socialisation within the family, where children learn basic language, social skills, and cultural norms from parents and close relatives. As individuals grow, they continue to be socialised through secondary agents such as schools, peer groups, the media, religion, and the workplace, learning the more specific roles, expectations, and behaviours associated with different social contexts and stages of life. Socialisation is crucial for individuals to become integrated members of their society and for the transmission of culture across generations.
The socialisation_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Socialisation and Cultural Reproduction' Causal relation: {Education, Family} → socialises → {Socialisation, Cultural_Reproduction} Semantical explanation of socialisation_ID000002: Socialisation refers to the lifelong social processes through which individuals develop an awareness of social norms, values, beliefs, and behaviours of their culture and society, and achieve a distinct sense of self and identity. This process begins in early childhood with primary socialisation within the family, where children learn basic language, social skills, and cultural norms from parents and close relatives. As individuals grow, they continue to be socialised through secondary agents such as schools, peer groups, the media, religion, and the workplace, learning the more specific roles, expectations, and behaviours associated with different social contexts and stages of life. Socialisation is crucial for individuals to become integrated members of their society and for the transmission of culture across generations.
The socialisation_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Peer Group Socialisation and Identity Formation' Causal relation: {Peer_Group, Social_Network} → socialises → {Identity, Socialisation} Semantical explanation of socialisation_ID000003: Socialisation refers to the lifelong social processes through which individuals develop an awareness of social norms, values, beliefs, and behaviours of their culture and society, and achieve a distinct sense of self and identity. This process begins in early childhood with primary socialisation within the family, where children learn basic language, social skills, and cultural norms from parents and close relatives. As individuals grow, they continue to be socialised through secondary agents such as schools, peer groups, the media, religion, and the workplace, learning the more specific roles, expectations, and behaviours associated with different social contexts and stages of life. Socialisation is crucial for individuals to become integrated members of their society and for the transmission of culture across generations.
The socialisation_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Peer Group Socialises Youth' Causal relation: {Peer_Group} → socialises → {Socialisation} Semantical explanation of socialisation_ID000004: Socialisation refers to the lifelong social processes through which individuals develop an awareness of social norms, values, beliefs, and behaviours of their culture and society, and achieve a distinct sense of self and identity. This process begins in early childhood with primary socialisation within the family, where children learn basic language, social skills, and cultural norms from parents and close relatives. As individuals grow, they continue to be socialised through secondary agents such as schools, peer groups, the media, religion, and the workplace, learning the more specific roles, expectations, and behaviours associated with different social contexts and stages of life. Socialisation is crucial for individuals to become integrated members of their society and for the transmission of culture across generations.
The socialisation_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Religion Socialises Believers' Causal relation: {Religion} → socialises → {Socialisation} Semantical explanation of socialisation_ID000005: Socialisation refers to the lifelong social processes through which individuals develop an awareness of social norms, values, beliefs, and behaviours of their culture and society, and achieve a distinct sense of self and identity. This process begins in early childhood with primary socialisation within the family, where children learn basic language, social skills, and cultural norms from parents and close relatives. As individuals grow, they continue to be socialised through secondary agents such as schools, peer groups, the media, religion, and the workplace, learning the more specific roles, expectations, and behaviours associated with different social contexts and stages of life. Socialisation is crucial for individuals to become integrated members of their society and for the transmission of culture across generations.
The socialisation_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Religious Socialisation and Moral Development' Causal relation: {Religion, Religious_Ritual} → socialises → {Value, Socialisation} Semantical explanation of socialisation_ID000006: Socialisation refers to the lifelong social processes through which individuals develop an awareness of social norms, values, beliefs, and behaviours of their culture and society, and achieve a distinct sense of self and identity. This process begins in early childhood with primary socialisation within the family, where children learn basic language, social skills, and cultural norms from parents and close relatives. As individuals grow, they continue to be socialised through secondary agents such as schools, peer groups, the media, religion, and the workplace, learning the more specific roles, expectations, and behaviours associated with different social contexts and stages of life. Socialisation is crucial for individuals to become integrated members of their society and for the transmission of culture across generations.
The squatter_Settlement_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Spatial Social Organisation' Causal relation: {Suburb, Megalopolis} → inhabits → {Defended_Neighborhood, Squatter_Settlement} Semantical explanation of squatter_Settlement_ID000001: Squatter settlements are informal and often unplanned areas of housing that are typically occupied by the very poor on the fringes of cities or in other marginal urban spaces, where residents do not have legal rights to the land they occupy or the dwellings they construct. Housing in squatter settlements is often self-built by the settlers themselves using whatever discarded or inexpensive materials they can find, resulting in makeshift structures that may lack basic amenities such as clean water, sanitation, electricity, and secure tenure. These settlements often emerge due to rapid urbanisation, poverty, lack of affordable housing, and inadequate urban planning, and they can face challenges related to overcrowding, health risks, and the threat of eviction. Sociologists study squatter settlements to understand the living conditions, social organisation, and the struggles for recognition and basic rights faced by their residents, as well as the broader issues of urban poverty and inequality.
The state_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Family Structure Regulation' Causal relation: {Law, State} → regulates → {Marriage, Family} Semantical explanation of state_ID000001: The state in sociology refers to a political apparatus or organised structure of rule that governs a specific territory and its population, characterised by its authority, which is generally backed by law, and its capacity to use force to maintain order and enforce its policies. It typically includes governmental institutions such as the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, as well as the civil service officials who administer state functions. A key feature of the state is its claim to sovereignty over the territory and its citizens, meaning it asserts the ultimate authority within its borders, often recognised by other states in the international system. The state plays a crucial role in establishing and enforcing laws, providing public services, regulating the economy, and defending its territory and interests, often relying on a monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within its boundaries to ensure compliance and maintain social order.
The state_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'State Social Control Mechanisms' Causal relation: {State, Government} → regulates → {Social_Control, Law} Semantical explanation of state_ID000002: The state in sociology refers to a political apparatus or organised structure of rule that governs a specific territory and its population, characterised by its authority, which is generally backed by law, and its capacity to use force to maintain order and enforce its policies. It typically includes governmental institutions such as the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, as well as the civil service officials who administer state functions. A key feature of the state is its claim to sovereignty over the territory and its citizens, meaning it asserts the ultimate authority within its borders, often recognised by other states in the international system. The state plays a crucial role in establishing and enforcing laws, providing public services, regulating the economy, and defending its territory and interests, often relying on a monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within its boundaries to ensure compliance and maintain social order.
The state_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'State Welfare and Social Redistribution' Causal relation: {State, Healthcare} → provides → {Social_Inequality, Poverty} Semantical explanation of state_ID000003: The state in sociology refers to a political apparatus or organised structure of rule that governs a specific territory and its population, characterised by its authority, which is generally backed by law, and its capacity to use force to maintain order and enforce its policies. It typically includes governmental institutions such as the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, as well as the civil service officials who administer state functions. A key feature of the state is its claim to sovereignty over the territory and its citizens, meaning it asserts the ultimate authority within its borders, often recognised by other states in the international system. The state plays a crucial role in establishing and enforcing laws, providing public services, regulating the economy, and defending its territory and interests, often relying on a monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within its boundaries to ensure compliance and maintain social order.
The state_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Surveillance Social Control' Causal relation: {Formal_Social_Control, State} → monitors → {Observation, Social_Control} Semantical explanation of state_ID000004: The state in sociology refers to a political apparatus or organised structure of rule that governs a specific territory and its population, characterised by its authority, which is generally backed by law, and its capacity to use force to maintain order and enforce its policies. It typically includes governmental institutions such as the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, as well as the civil service officials who administer state functions. A key feature of the state is its claim to sovereignty over the territory and its citizens, meaning it asserts the ultimate authority within its borders, often recognised by other states in the international system. The state plays a crucial role in establishing and enforcing laws, providing public services, regulating the economy, and defending its territory and interests, often relying on a monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within its boundaries to ensure compliance and maintain social order.
The status_Group_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Status Group Competition' Causal relation: {Status_Group, Ethnic_Group} → competesWith → {Prestige, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of status_Group_ID000001: A status group, as defined by Max Weber, is a category of people within a society who share a similar level of social prestige, honor, or lifestyle, which may or may not be directly related to their economic class position. Membership in a status group is often based on shared attributes such as ethnicity, religion, occupation, education, or family background, which are socially valued or devalued and contribute to a sense of collective identity and social standing. Status groups are characterised by a shared style of life, which can include distinctive patterns of consumption, social interaction, and cultural practices. While class refers to economic position in the market, status is about social honor and can influence social interactions and access to certain social circles or opportunities, sometimes independently of economic factors.
The status_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Anticipatory Socialisation and Status Preparation' Causal relation: {Anticipatory_Socialisation, Role_Taking} → socialises → {Status, Identity} Semantical explanation of status_ID000001: Status, in sociological terms, refers to any of the full range of socially defined positions that an individual can occupy within a large group or society. Statuses provide a framework for social organisation and interaction, as they come with associated roles, expectations, rights, and obligations that guide how individuals are expected to behave in different social contexts. As mentioned previously, statuses can be either ascribed, assigned to an individual at birth or involuntarily, or achieved, attained through personal effort or choice. An individual typically holds multiple statuses simultaneously, forming their status set, and one status may become more significant than others in shaping their social identity and interactions; this is known as a master status.
The stigma_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Labeling and Deviant Identity Formation' Causal relation: {Labeling_Theory, Stigma} → stigmatises → {Deviance, Social_Exclusion} Semantical explanation of stigma_ID000001: Stigma refers to a negative label, mark of disgrace, or social disapproval that is used to devalue members of deviant social groups or individuals who possess certain characteristics or attributes that are seen as undesirable or different from the prevailing social norms. A stigma can be attached to various conditions, behaviours, or identities, such as mental illness, criminal history, physical disabilities, certain lifestyles, or membership in particular social groups. The process of stigmatisation can lead to social exclusion, discrimination, prejudice, and a loss of social status for the stigmatised individuals or groups, often impacting their self-esteem, social interactions, and opportunities in life. Labeling theory in sociology highlights the role of stigma in the social construction of deviance and its consequences for those who are labeled.
The stigma_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Marginalisation and Deviance' Causal relation: {Deviance, Stigma} → marginalises → {Social_Exclusion, Minority_Group} Semantical explanation of stigma_ID000002: Stigma refers to a negative label, mark of disgrace, or social disapproval that is used to devalue members of deviant social groups or individuals who possess certain characteristics or attributes that are seen as undesirable or different from the prevailing social norms. A stigma can be attached to various conditions, behaviours, or identities, such as mental illness, criminal history, physical disabilities, certain lifestyles, or membership in particular social groups. The process of stigmatisation can lead to social exclusion, discrimination, prejudice, and a loss of social status for the stigmatised individuals or groups, often impacting their self-esteem, social interactions, and opportunities in life. Labeling theory in sociology highlights the role of stigma in the social construction of deviance and its consequences for those who are labeled.
The stigma_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Stigmatisation and Identity Management' Causal relation: {Stigma, Labeling_Theory} → stigmatises → {Identity, Social_Exclusion} Semantical explanation of stigma_ID000003: Stigma refers to a negative label, mark of disgrace, or social disapproval that is used to devalue members of deviant social groups or individuals who possess certain characteristics or attributes that are seen as undesirable or different from the prevailing social norms. A stigma can be attached to various conditions, behaviours, or identities, such as mental illness, criminal history, physical disabilities, certain lifestyles, or membership in particular social groups. The process of stigmatisation can lead to social exclusion, discrimination, prejudice, and a loss of social status for the stigmatised individuals or groups, often impacting their self-esteem, social interactions, and opportunities in life. Labeling theory in sociology highlights the role of stigma in the social construction of deviance and its consequences for those who are labeled.
The stigma_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Stigmatisation Processes' Causal relation: {Labeling_Theory, Social_Constructionist_Perspective} → stigmatises → {Stigma, Deviance} Semantical explanation of stigma_ID000004: Stigma refers to a negative label, mark of disgrace, or social disapproval that is used to devalue members of deviant social groups or individuals who possess certain characteristics or attributes that are seen as undesirable or different from the prevailing social norms. A stigma can be attached to various conditions, behaviours, or identities, such as mental illness, criminal history, physical disabilities, certain lifestyles, or membership in particular social groups. The process of stigmatisation can lead to social exclusion, discrimination, prejudice, and a loss of social status for the stigmatised individuals or groups, often impacting their self-esteem, social interactions, and opportunities in life. Labeling theory in sociology highlights the role of stigma in the social construction of deviance and its consequences for those who are labeled.
The stigma_ID000005 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Stigma Stigmatises Individuals' Causal relation: {Stigma} → stigmatises → {Identity} Semantical explanation of stigma_ID000005: Stigma refers to a negative label, mark of disgrace, or social disapproval that is used to devalue members of deviant social groups or individuals who possess certain characteristics or attributes that are seen as undesirable or different from the prevailing social norms. A stigma can be attached to various conditions, behaviours, or identities, such as mental illness, criminal history, physical disabilities, certain lifestyles, or membership in particular social groups. The process of stigmatisation can lead to social exclusion, discrimination, prejudice, and a loss of social status for the stigmatised individuals or groups, often impacting their self-esteem, social interactions, and opportunities in life. Labeling theory in sociology highlights the role of stigma in the social construction of deviance and its consequences for those who are labeled.
The strike_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Labor Movement Resistance' Causal relation: {Labour_Union, Trade_Union} → protests → {Strike, Working_Class} Semantical explanation of strike_ID000001: A strike is a temporary stoppage of work or a collective withdrawal of labor by a group of workers or employees from their workplace as a form of protest or to exert pressure on their employer to meet specific demands or grievances, such as for better wages, improved working conditions, job security, or other employment-related issues. Strikes are a key tactic used by labor unions as part of collective bargaining to negotiate with employers and advocate for the rights and interests of their members. The decision to strike is often a significant one, involving a collective vote by union members, and it can have economic and social consequences for both the workers and the employer.
The strike_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Resource Mobilisation for Collective Action' Causal relation: {Resource_Mobilisation, Political_Action_Committee_(PAC)} → mobilises → {Social_Movement, Strike} Semantical explanation of strike_ID000002: A strike is a temporary stoppage of work or a collective withdrawal of labor by a group of workers or employees from their workplace as a form of protest or to exert pressure on their employer to meet specific demands or grievances, such as for better wages, improved working conditions, job security, or other employment-related issues. Strikes are a key tactic used by labor unions as part of collective bargaining to negotiate with employers and advocate for the rights and interests of their members. The decision to strike is often a significant one, involving a collective vote by union members, and it can have economic and social consequences for both the workers and the employer.
The structural_Functionalism_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Marginalisation Mechanisms' Causal relation: {Neoliberalism, Structural_Functionalism} → marginalises → {Social_Exclusion, Relative_Deprivation} Semantical explanation of structural_Functionalism_ID000001: Structural functionalism is a major theoretical perspective in sociology that is rooted in the work of Émile Durkheim and further developed by Talcott Parsons and Robert Merton. This perspective analyses societies as complex social systems composed of various interconnected social institutions (such as the family, education, religion, government, and the economy), each of which performs specific functions that contribute to the overall stability, order, and smooth operation of the system as a whole. Structural functionalists examine how these institutions work together to meet the needs of society and maintain social equilibrium through shared norms, values, and consensus. They often focus on the functions (both manifest and latent) of social structures and how they contribute to social cohesion and the maintenance of social order.
The structuration_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Organisational Coordination and Efficiency' Causal relation: {Organisation, Bureaucracy} → coordinates → {Structuration, Rationalisation} Semantical explanation of structuration_ID000001: Structuration is a sociological theory, most prominently associated with the work of Anthony Giddens, that attempts to bridge the divide between agency (the actions of individuals) and social structure (the broader social forces and institutions that shape those actions). It posits that social structure and human agency are not separate or opposing forces but are mutually dependent and interactive in a two-way process. Individuals shape their social world through their everyday actions and practices, but these actions are also enabled and constrained by existing social structures, which in turn are reproduced and sometimes transformed through those very actions. Structuration emphasises the dynamic and recursive relationship between individual agency and social structure, highlighting how they continuously influence and reshape each other over time.
The suburb_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Spatial Social Organisation' Causal relation: {Suburb, Megalopolis} → inhabits → {Defended_Neighborhood, Squatter_Settlement} Semantical explanation of suburb_ID000001: According to the U.S. Census Bureau, a suburb is defined as any territory within a metropolitan statistical area (MSA) that is not included in the central city or cities of that MSA. Metropolitan areas are typically defined as having at least one urbanised area of 50,000 or more people, plus adjacent territory that has a high degree of social and economic integration with the core urban area, as measured by commuting ties. Suburbs are often characterised by lower population density compared to central cities, a higher proportion of single-family homes, and a greater reliance on automobiles for transportation. They have become a significant form of residential and commercial development in many industrialised countries, often representing a migration of population and economic activity away from the central urban core. The development and characteristics of suburbs are influenced by various factors, including transportation infrastructure, housing policies, economic trends, and social preferences.
The suburb_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Suburbanisation and Spatial Restructuring' Causal relation: {Suburb} → spatiallyRelatedTo → {Segregation, Migration} Semantical explanation of suburb_ID000002: According to the U.S. Census Bureau, a suburb is defined as any territory within a metropolitan statistical area (MSA) that is not included in the central city or cities of that MSA. Metropolitan areas are typically defined as having at least one urbanised area of 50,000 or more people, plus adjacent territory that has a high degree of social and economic integration with the core urban area, as measured by commuting ties. Suburbs are often characterised by lower population density compared to central cities, a higher proportion of single-family homes, and a greater reliance on automobiles for transportation. They have become a significant form of residential and commercial development in many industrialised countries, often representing a migration of population and economic activity away from the central urban core. The development and characteristics of suburbs are influenced by various factors, including transportation infrastructure, housing policies, economic trends, and social preferences.
The surplus_Value_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Labor Exploitation' Causal relation: {Capitalist, Bourgeoisie} → exploits → {Surplus_Value, Proletariat} Semantical explanation of surplus_Value_ID000001: In Marxist economic theory, surplus value is the difference between the value of the goods or services produced by a worker's labor power and the wages the employer pays for that labor power; it is the value of the worker's labor that is 'left over' after the employer has covered all the costs involved in hiring the worker, including wages and the costs of production. According to Marx, this surplus value is the source of capitalist profit and represents the exploitation of the proletariat (working class) by the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) because the workers do not receive the full value of what they produce; instead, the surplus is appropriated by the capitalists who own the means of production. The extraction of surplus value is seen by Marx as a fundamental characteristic of capitalism and a key driver of the inherent conflict between the interests of capitalists and workers.
The survey_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Public Opinion Research' Causal relation: {Survey, Questionnaire} → surveys → {Qualitative_Research_Method, Quantitative_Research_Method, Representative_Sample} Semantical explanation of survey_ID000001: A survey is a widely used method of sociological research that typically involves the systematic administration of a standardised set of questions, often in the form of questionnaires, to a sample of individuals drawn from a larger population being studied. The goal of a survey is to collect data on the attitudes, beliefs, behaviours, opinions, or characteristics of the population of interest through the responses provided by the sample members. The data collected through surveys is often analysed using statistical techniques to identify patterns, regularities, and relationships between variables within the population. Surveys can be conducted in various formats, including mail-in questionnaires, telephone interviews, face-to-face interviews, and online surveys, each with its own advantages and limitations in terms of cost, response rates, and the type of data that can be collected. The quality of a survey depends on factors such as the design of the questions, the selection of a representative sample, and the rate of response from the participants.
The survey_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Research Data Collection' Causal relation: {Survey, Census} → surveys → {Quantitative_Research_Method, Representative_Sample} Semantical explanation of survey_ID000002: A survey is a widely used method of sociological research that typically involves the systematic administration of a standardised set of questions, often in the form of questionnaires, to a sample of individuals drawn from a larger population being studied. The goal of a survey is to collect data on the attitudes, beliefs, behaviours, opinions, or characteristics of the population of interest through the responses provided by the sample members. The data collected through surveys is often analysed using statistical techniques to identify patterns, regularities, and relationships between variables within the population. Surveys can be conducted in various formats, including mail-in questionnaires, telephone interviews, face-to-face interviews, and online surveys, each with its own advantages and limitations in terms of cost, response rates, and the type of data that can be collected. The quality of a survey depends on factors such as the design of the questions, the selection of a representative sample, and the rate of response from the participants.
The sustainable_Development_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Environmental Mobilisation and Sustainability' Causal relation: {Environmental_Sociology, Science} → mobilises → {Sustainable_Development, Natural_Environment} Semantical explanation of sustainable_Development_ID000001: Sustainable development is a concept and an approach to economic growth and social progress that emphasises the need to meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. It is based on the principle that economic development should proceed in a way that natural resources are used responsibly and, where possible, recycled rather than depleted, biodiversity is maintained and protected, and clean air, water, and land are safeguarded for the long-term well-being of both human societies and the environment. Sustainable development seeks to integrate economic, social, and environmental considerations in decision-making, recognizing the interconnectedness of these dimensions and the importance of balancing them to achieve a more equitable and environmentally sound future for all.
The sustainable_Development_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Environmental Technology and Development' Causal relation: {Innovation, Sustainable_Development} → influencesHistorically → {Economic_System, Social_Change} Semantical explanation of sustainable_Development_ID000002: Sustainable development is a concept and an approach to economic growth and social progress that emphasises the need to meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. It is based on the principle that economic development should proceed in a way that natural resources are used responsibly and, where possible, recycled rather than depleted, biodiversity is maintained and protected, and clean air, water, and land are safeguarded for the long-term well-being of both human societies and the environment. Sustainable development seeks to integrate economic, social, and environmental considerations in decision-making, recognizing the interconnectedness of these dimensions and the importance of balancing them to achieve a more equitable and environmentally sound future for all.
The sweatshop_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Corporate Labor Exploitation' Causal relation: {Multinational_Corporation, Sweatshop} → exploits → {Exploitation_Theory, Working_Class} Semantical explanation of sweatshop_ID000001: Sweatshop is a derogatory term used to describe a factory, workshop, or other place of work in which employees are subjected to exploitative labor practices, including working long hours for very low wages, often under poor, unsafe, or unhealthy working conditions that may violate labor laws and basic human rights. Sweatshops are often associated with industries that have high labor intensity and operate in countries or regions with lax labor regulations or weak enforcement, where the pressure to produce goods at very low costs can lead to the exploitation of workers, including women and children. The issue of sweatshops has gained international attention due to concerns about fair labor practices, human rights, and the ethical implications of global supply chains.
The total_Institution_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Resocialisation' Causal relation: {Total_Institution, Degradation_Ceremony} → resocialises → {Resocialisation, Identity} Semantical explanation of total_Institution_ID000001: Total institutions, a term popularised by sociologist Erving Goffman, refer to facilities such as asylums for the mentally ill, prisons, monasteries, military barracks, and boarding schools that exert a pervasive and encompassing influence on the lives of their residents by imposing a forcibly regulated system of existence in complete or near-complete isolation from the outside world. These institutions are characterised by a breakdown of the barriers separating the three spheres of life that are usually distinct: sleep, work, and play; all aspects of life are conducted in the same place and under the same single authority. Residents typically experience a loss of autonomy and personal identity as their daily routines are strictly controlled, and they are subjected to a uniform system of rules and regulations aimed at managing large groups of people within the confines of the institution. Goffman's analysis of total institutions highlighted the processes of resocialisation and the potential for the stripping away of former identities and the adoption of an institutional identity among residents.
The total_Institution_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Institutional Resocialisation and Identity Change' Causal relation: {Resocialisation, Total_Institution} → governs → {Identity, Social_Role} Semantical explanation of total_Institution_ID000002: Total institutions, a term popularised by sociologist Erving Goffman, refer to facilities such as asylums for the mentally ill, prisons, monasteries, military barracks, and boarding schools that exert a pervasive and encompassing influence on the lives of their residents by imposing a forcibly regulated system of existence in complete or near-complete isolation from the outside world. These institutions are characterised by a breakdown of the barriers separating the three spheres of life that are usually distinct: sleep, work, and play; all aspects of life are conducted in the same place and under the same single authority. Residents typically experience a loss of autonomy and personal identity as their daily routines are strictly controlled, and they are subjected to a uniform system of rules and regulations aimed at managing large groups of people within the confines of the institution. Goffman's analysis of total institutions highlighted the processes of resocialisation and the potential for the stripping away of former identities and the adoption of an institutional identity among residents.
The tracking_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Stratification and Opportunity' Causal relation: {Education, Tracking} → stratifies → {Social_Class, Social_Mobility} Semantical explanation of tracking_ID000001: Tracking, in the context of education, is the practice of placing students in specific curriculum groups or academic programs within a school system based on their perceived academic abilities, which are often assessed through standardised test scores, prior academic performance, or teacher recommendations. This practice can result in students being separated into different tracks, such as "high-achieving," "average," or "low-achieving," which may offer different levels of academic rigor, resources, and future opportunities. While proponents argue that tracking allows teachers to tailor instruction to the specific needs of students at different academic levels, critics raise concerns about its potential to perpetuate social inequalities, as students from disadvantaged backgrounds may be disproportionately placed in lower tracks, limiting their educational attainment and future prospects, while those in higher tracks often receive more enriched learning experiences and better preparation for college. The effects of tracking on student achievement and social equity remain a subject of ongoing debate in educational sociology.
The tracking_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Educational Tracking Systems' Causal relation: {Tracking, Education} → segregates → {Segregation, Social_Stratification} Semantical explanation of tracking_ID000002: Tracking, in the context of education, is the practice of placing students in specific curriculum groups or academic programs within a school system based on their perceived academic abilities, which are often assessed through standardised test scores, prior academic performance, or teacher recommendations. This practice can result in students being separated into different tracks, such as "high-achieving," "average," or "low-achieving," which may offer different levels of academic rigor, resources, and future opportunities. While proponents argue that tracking allows teachers to tailor instruction to the specific needs of students at different academic levels, critics raise concerns about its potential to perpetuate social inequalities, as students from disadvantaged backgrounds may be disproportionately placed in lower tracks, limiting their educational attainment and future prospects, while those in higher tracks often receive more enriched learning experiences and better preparation for college. The effects of tracking on student achievement and social equity remain a subject of ongoing debate in educational sociology.
The trade_Union_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Labor Movement Resistance' Causal relation: {Labour_Union, Trade_Union} → protests → {Strike, Working_Class} Semantical explanation of trade_Union_ID000001: Trade unions, also known as labor unions, are organisations formed by workers in a specific trade, industry, or company with the primary purpose of maintaining or improving the conditions of their employment. These conditions typically include attaining better wages and benefits, improving working conditions, and enhancing safety standards in the workplace. Trade unions operate through elected leadership and bargaining committees that negotiate with employers on behalf of their members in a process known as collective bargaining, aiming to establish labor contracts or collective bargaining agreements that outline the terms of employment. Unions may organise workers based on their specific skills (craft unionism), across various trades (general unionism), or within an entire industry (industrial unionism). Historically, trade unions emerged in response to the often precarious and exploitative conditions faced by workers, particularly during the Industrial Revolution, providing a collective voice and power to negotiate for fairer treatment and improved livelihoods. They have played a significant role in advocating for workers' rights, safer workplaces, and the end of child labor, often operating with a democratic structure where members elect officers and pay dues to support the union's activities.
The trade_Union_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Labor Organisation and Worker Protection' Causal relation: {Labour_Union, Trade_Union} → protests → {Capitalism, Bourgeoisie} Semantical explanation of trade_Union_ID000002: Trade unions, also known as labor unions, are organisations formed by workers in a specific trade, industry, or company with the primary purpose of maintaining or improving the conditions of their employment. These conditions typically include attaining better wages and benefits, improving working conditions, and enhancing safety standards in the workplace. Trade unions operate through elected leadership and bargaining committees that negotiate with employers on behalf of their members in a process known as collective bargaining, aiming to establish labor contracts or collective bargaining agreements that outline the terms of employment. Unions may organise workers based on their specific skills (craft unionism), across various trades (general unionism), or within an entire industry (industrial unionism). Historically, trade unions emerged in response to the often precarious and exploitative conditions faced by workers, particularly during the Industrial Revolution, providing a collective voice and power to negotiate for fairer treatment and improved livelihoods. They have played a significant role in advocating for workers' rights, safer workplaces, and the end of child labor, often operating with a democratic structure where members elect officers and pay dues to support the union's activities.
The traditional_Authority_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Authority Legitimation Processes' Causal relation: {Legal-rational_Authority, Traditional_Authority} → regulates → {Legitimacy, Power} Semantical explanation of traditional_Authority_ID000001: Traditional authority, as defined by Max Weber, is a form of legitimate power that is conferred by custom, established traditions, and accepted practices that have been passed down over time. This type of authority is often associated with hereditary leadership, where the right to rule is inherited through family lineage and is accepted as legitimate because it has always been that way. Obedience is owed to the person in authority due to their traditional status and the sanctity of established customs, rather than based on their personal charisma or legally defined rules. Examples of traditional authority can be found in monarchies where power is passed down through royal families, or in traditional tribal societies where leadership is based on long-standing customs and norms. Weber contrasted traditional authority with charismatic authority, which is based on the exceptional personal appeal of a leader, and rational-legal authority, which is based on formally established rules and laws.
The traditional_Authority_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Religious Authority and Social Cohesion' Causal relation: {Religion, Traditional_Authority} → transmits → {Sacred, Social_Cohesion} Semantical explanation of traditional_Authority_ID000002: Traditional authority, as defined by Max Weber, is a form of legitimate power that is conferred by custom, established traditions, and accepted practices that have been passed down over time. This type of authority is often associated with hereditary leadership, where the right to rule is inherited through family lineage and is accepted as legitimate because it has always been that way. Obedience is owed to the person in authority due to their traditional status and the sanctity of established customs, rather than based on their personal charisma or legally defined rules. Examples of traditional authority can be found in monarchies where power is passed down through royal families, or in traditional tribal societies where leadership is based on long-standing customs and norms. Weber contrasted traditional authority with charismatic authority, which is based on the exceptional personal appeal of a leader, and rational-legal authority, which is based on formally established rules and laws.
The underclass_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Marginalisation Process' Causal relation: {Neoliberalism, Deindustrialisation} → marginalises → {Underground_Economy, Underclass} Semantical explanation of underclass_ID000001: The underclass is a term used in sociology to describe a group of people who are considered to be 'under' or outside the traditional class structure of society, often characterised by chronic poverty, long-term unemployment or underemployment, social isolation, and economic, political, and social marginalisation and exclusion. Members of the underclass may experience multiple and overlapping forms of disadvantage, including limited access to education, healthcare, stable housing, and social support networks, often leading to a cycle of poverty that is difficult to escape. The concept of the underclass is often associated with inner-city areas and may be linked to factors such as deindustrialisation, lack of job opportunities, and systemic discrimination. There is ongoing debate among sociologists about the definition, causes, and consequences of the underclass, as well as the most effective ways to address the complex issues of poverty and social exclusion that affect this group.
The underclass_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Exclusion and Marginalisation' Causal relation: {Upper_Class, Bourgeoisie} → excludes → {Underclass, Minority_Group} Semantical explanation of underclass_ID000002: The underclass is a term used in sociology to describe a group of people who are considered to be 'under' or outside the traditional class structure of society, often characterised by chronic poverty, long-term unemployment or underemployment, social isolation, and economic, political, and social marginalisation and exclusion. Members of the underclass may experience multiple and overlapping forms of disadvantage, including limited access to education, healthcare, stable housing, and social support networks, often leading to a cycle of poverty that is difficult to escape. The concept of the underclass is often associated with inner-city areas and may be linked to factors such as deindustrialisation, lack of job opportunities, and systemic discrimination. There is ongoing debate among sociologists about the definition, causes, and consequences of the underclass, as well as the most effective ways to address the complex issues of poverty and social exclusion that affect this group.
The underdevelopment_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Colonial Economic Extraction' Causal relation: {Colonialism, Neo-colonialism} → exploits → {Exploitation_Theory, Underdevelopment} Semantical explanation of underdevelopment_ID000001: Underdevelopment is a concept used in social science, particularly in the context of global inequality and post-colonial studies, to describe the economic state of societies, primarily in the Global South, that were historically exploited and/or previously colonised by Western countries during the periods of colonialism. This perspective suggests that the current state of poverty and limited economic development in many of these societies is not simply a natural or inevitable condition but is, in part, a result of historical processes of exploitation and dependence imposed by powerful, wealthy states, which actively extracted resources, disrupted local economies, and established unequal trade relationships that continue to disadvantage these nations. Underdevelopment theory emphasises the historical and ongoing power dynamics between developed and developing countries, highlighting how the wealth and prosperity of some nations may have been built upon the exploitation and impoverishment of others, perpetuating a cycle of dependence and hindering genuine economic development in the formerly colonised regions.
The underdevelopment_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Poverty and Social Disadvantage' Causal relation: {Poverty, Underdevelopment} → causallyInfluencedBy → {Crime, Health} Semantical explanation of underdevelopment_ID000002: Underdevelopment is a concept used in social science, particularly in the context of global inequality and post-colonial studies, to describe the economic state of societies, primarily in the Global South, that were historically exploited and/or previously colonised by Western countries during the periods of colonialism. This perspective suggests that the current state of poverty and limited economic development in many of these societies is not simply a natural or inevitable condition but is, in part, a result of historical processes of exploitation and dependence imposed by powerful, wealthy states, which actively extracted resources, disrupted local economies, and established unequal trade relationships that continue to disadvantage these nations. Underdevelopment theory emphasises the historical and ongoing power dynamics between developed and developing countries, highlighting how the wealth and prosperity of some nations may have been built upon the exploitation and impoverishment of others, perpetuating a cycle of dependence and hindering genuine economic development in the formerly colonised regions.
The underground_Economy_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Economic Marginalisation Process' Causal relation: {Neoliberalism, Deindustrialisation} → marginalises → {Underground_Economy, Underclass} Semantical explanation of underground_Economy_ID000001: The underground economy, also known as the shadow economy or informal economy, refers to economic activity that generates income but is unreported to the government as required by law, often to avoid taxation or regulation. This can include a wide range of activities, both legal and illegal, such as undeclared cash transactions, off-the-books employment, informal services, the sale of illegal goods, and other economic exchanges that take place outside the formal, regulated sector of the economy. The size and nature of the underground economy can vary significantly across different countries and regions, influenced by factors such as tax rates, regulatory burdens, levels of corruption, and the availability of formal employment opportunities. While it can provide income for individuals who may be excluded from the formal economy, it also has implications for government revenue, economic statistics, and social protections for workers involved in these activities.
The upper_Class_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Exclusion and Marginalisation' Causal relation: {Upper_Class, Bourgeoisie} → excludes → {Underclass, Minority_Group} Semantical explanation of upper_Class_ID000001: The upper class is a social class broadly composed of the most affluent members of society, who typically possess significant wealth, often inherited across generations, and may own large businesses or hold substantial numbers of stocks and shares, wielding considerable economic and social influence. Membership in the upper class is often associated with high social status, exclusive social networks, and a lifestyle characterised by luxury and privilege. While income can be a factor, upper-class status is often more closely tied to the ownership of assets and the perpetuation of wealth over time, distinguishing it from other affluent individuals who may have high incomes but less accumulated wealth or inherited privilege. This class often plays a significant role in shaping economic and political landscapes due to its control over resources and its influence within elite circles.
The urban_Ecology_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Industrial Urban Development' Causal relation: {Industrial_City, Industrialism} → urbanises → {Urban_Ecology, Postindustrial_City} Semantical explanation of urban_Ecology_ID000001: Urban ecology is a subfield within sociology that focuses on the study of the intricate link and dynamic interrelationships between the physical and social dimensions of cities, examining how the spatial organisation, physical environment, and material infrastructure of urban areas shape social life, human behaviour, and community dynamics, and vice versa. It explores topics such as the distribution of populations, resources, and social problems within urban spaces, the impact of urban design and planning on social interactions, the relationship between urban environments and human health, and the processes of urban growth, change, and sustainability. Drawing on ecological principles, urban ecology views the city as a complex ecosystem where social and physical factors are interdependent and constantly interacting to shape the urban experience.
The urban_Ecology_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Segregation and Spatial Organisation' Causal relation: {Segregation, Social_Class} → segregates → {Urban_Ecology, Social_Social_Spatial_Region} Semantical explanation of urban_Ecology_ID000002: Urban ecology is a subfield within sociology that focuses on the study of the intricate link and dynamic interrelationships between the physical and social dimensions of cities, examining how the spatial organisation, physical environment, and material infrastructure of urban areas shape social life, human behaviour, and community dynamics, and vice versa. It explores topics such as the distribution of populations, resources, and social problems within urban spaces, the impact of urban design and planning on social interactions, the relationship between urban environments and human health, and the processes of urban growth, change, and sustainability. Drawing on ecological principles, urban ecology views the city as a complex ecosystem where social and physical factors are interdependent and constantly interacting to shape the urban experience.
The urban_Ecology_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Urban Development and Social Change' Causal relation: {Urbanisation, Industrial_Revolution} → urbanises → {Urban_Ecology, Metropolis} Semantical explanation of urban_Ecology_ID000003: Urban ecology is a subfield within sociology that focuses on the study of the intricate link and dynamic interrelationships between the physical and social dimensions of cities, examining how the spatial organisation, physical environment, and material infrastructure of urban areas shape social life, human behaviour, and community dynamics, and vice versa. It explores topics such as the distribution of populations, resources, and social problems within urban spaces, the impact of urban design and planning on social interactions, the relationship between urban environments and human health, and the processes of urban growth, change, and sustainability. Drawing on ecological principles, urban ecology views the city as a complex ecosystem where social and physical factors are interdependent and constantly interacting to shape the urban experience.
The urban_Renewal_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Gentrification and Residential Displacement' Causal relation: {Gentrification, Urban_Renewal} → excludes → {Working_Class, Poverty} Semantical explanation of urban_Renewal_ID000001: Urban renewal is a comprehensive process aimed at reviving and revitalizing deteriorating neighborhoods and urban areas that may be experiencing decline, disinvestment, or social problems. It typically involves a range of strategies, such as recycling underutilised land and existing buildings for new purposes, improving the physical environment through infrastructure upgrades and beautification projects, implementing better management practices for local areas with the active participation of local citizens, and strategically using public funds to stimulate regeneration and attract further private investment. The goals of urban renewal often include enhancing the quality of life for residents, fostering economic development, improving housing conditions, and creating more vibrant and sustainable urban communities. However, urban renewal projects can sometimes lead to unintended consequences such as gentrification and the displacement of existing low-income residents, making community engagement and equitable planning crucial aspects of the process.
The urban_Renewal_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Urban Gentrification and Social Displacement' Causal relation: {Gentrification, Urban_Renewal} → gentrifies → {Working_Class, Social_Class} Semantical explanation of urban_Renewal_ID000002: Urban renewal is a comprehensive process aimed at reviving and revitalizing deteriorating neighborhoods and urban areas that may be experiencing decline, disinvestment, or social problems. It typically involves a range of strategies, such as recycling underutilised land and existing buildings for new purposes, improving the physical environment through infrastructure upgrades and beautification projects, implementing better management practices for local areas with the active participation of local citizens, and strategically using public funds to stimulate regeneration and attract further private investment. The goals of urban renewal often include enhancing the quality of life for residents, fostering economic development, improving housing conditions, and creating more vibrant and sustainable urban communities. However, urban renewal projects can sometimes lead to unintended consequences such as gentrification and the displacement of existing low-income residents, making community engagement and equitable planning crucial aspects of the process.
The urban_Renewal_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Urban Gentrification Displacement' Causal relation: {Gentrification, Urban_Renewal} → gentrifies → {Working_Class, Social_Exclusion} Semantical explanation of urban_Renewal_ID000003: Urban renewal is a comprehensive process aimed at reviving and revitalizing deteriorating neighborhoods and urban areas that may be experiencing decline, disinvestment, or social problems. It typically involves a range of strategies, such as recycling underutilised land and existing buildings for new purposes, improving the physical environment through infrastructure upgrades and beautification projects, implementing better management practices for local areas with the active participation of local citizens, and strategically using public funds to stimulate regeneration and attract further private investment. The goals of urban renewal often include enhancing the quality of life for residents, fostering economic development, improving housing conditions, and creating more vibrant and sustainable urban communities. However, urban renewal projects can sometimes lead to unintended consequences such as gentrification and the displacement of existing low-income residents, making community engagement and equitable planning crucial aspects of the process.
The urbanisation_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Industrialisation Urbanises Society' Causal relation: {Industrial_Society} → urbanises → {Urbanisation} Semantical explanation of urbanisation_ID000001: Urbanisation refers to the process of the development of towns and cities, typically involving the growth in the size and population of urban areas and the increasing concentration of people living and working in these areas. This process is often linked to economic development, industrialisation, and the migration of people from rural to urban areas in search of opportunities. Urbanisation leads to significant transformations in land use, infrastructure development, social organisation, and lifestyles, creating complex urban environments that serve as centers of economic, political, and cultural activity. The study of urbanisation examines its causes, patterns, and consequences for societies, including issues related to urban planning, housing, transportation, social inequality, and environmental sustainability.
The urbanisation_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Rural-Urban Population Movement' Causal relation: {Urbanisation, Industrial_Society} → migrates → {Migration, Demographic_Transition} Semantical explanation of urbanisation_ID000002: Urbanisation refers to the process of the development of towns and cities, typically involving the growth in the size and population of urban areas and the increasing concentration of people living and working in these areas. This process is often linked to economic development, industrialisation, and the migration of people from rural to urban areas in search of opportunities. Urbanisation leads to significant transformations in land use, infrastructure development, social organisation, and lifestyles, creating complex urban environments that serve as centers of economic, political, and cultural activity. The study of urbanisation examines its causes, patterns, and consequences for societies, including issues related to urban planning, housing, transportation, social inequality, and environmental sustainability.
The urbanisation_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Urban Development and Social Change' Causal relation: {Urbanisation, Industrial_Revolution} → urbanises → {Urban_Ecology, Metropolis} Semantical explanation of urbanisation_ID000003: Urbanisation refers to the process of the development of towns and cities, typically involving the growth in the size and population of urban areas and the increasing concentration of people living and working in these areas. This process is often linked to economic development, industrialisation, and the migration of people from rural to urban areas in search of opportunities. Urbanisation leads to significant transformations in land use, infrastructure development, social organisation, and lifestyles, creating complex urban environments that serve as centers of economic, political, and cultural activity. The study of urbanisation examines its causes, patterns, and consequences for societies, including issues related to urban planning, housing, transportation, social inequality, and environmental sustainability.
The urbanisation_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Urbanisation and Social Transformation' Causal relation: {Urbanisation, Industrial_Society} → urbanises → {Urbanism, Social_Structure} Semantical explanation of urbanisation_ID000004: Urbanisation refers to the process of the development of towns and cities, typically involving the growth in the size and population of urban areas and the increasing concentration of people living and working in these areas. This process is often linked to economic development, industrialisation, and the migration of people from rural to urban areas in search of opportunities. Urbanisation leads to significant transformations in land use, infrastructure development, social organisation, and lifestyles, creating complex urban environments that serve as centers of economic, political, and cultural activity. The study of urbanisation examines its causes, patterns, and consequences for societies, including issues related to urban planning, housing, transportation, social inequality, and environmental sustainability.
The urbanism_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Migration and Urban Diversity' Causal relation: {Migration, Population} → influencesHistorically → {Urbanism, Cultural_Diversity} Semantical explanation of urbanism_ID000001: Urbanism is a term used by sociologist Louis Wirth to denote the distinctive characteristics of social life that emerge in urban settings, particularly in large, densely populated cities, such as a greater degree of impersonality, anonymity, social heterogeneity, and a more complex division of labor compared to rural areas. Wirth argued that the size, density, and heterogeneity of urban populations shape the nature of social interactions and the social psychology of city dwellers, often leading to more formal and instrumental relationships, increased social tolerance for diversity, and a greater sense of individual freedom alongside potential feelings of social isolation or alienation. The study of urbanism explores how these unique social patterns and experiences in cities differ from those in more rural or traditional communities.
The urbanism_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Urban Planning and Spatial Organisation' Causal relation: {Government, Bureaucracy} → regulates → {Urbanism, Organisation} Semantical explanation of urbanism_ID000002: Urbanism is a term used by sociologist Louis Wirth to denote the distinctive characteristics of social life that emerge in urban settings, particularly in large, densely populated cities, such as a greater degree of impersonality, anonymity, social heterogeneity, and a more complex division of labor compared to rural areas. Wirth argued that the size, density, and heterogeneity of urban populations shape the nature of social interactions and the social psychology of city dwellers, often leading to more formal and instrumental relationships, increased social tolerance for diversity, and a greater sense of individual freedom alongside potential feelings of social isolation or alienation. The study of urbanism explores how these unique social patterns and experiences in cities differ from those in more rural or traditional communities.
The urbanism_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Urbanisation and Social Transformation' Causal relation: {Urbanisation, Industrial_Society} → urbanises → {Urbanism, Social_Structure} Semantical explanation of urbanism_ID000003: Urbanism is a term used by sociologist Louis Wirth to denote the distinctive characteristics of social life that emerge in urban settings, particularly in large, densely populated cities, such as a greater degree of impersonality, anonymity, social heterogeneity, and a more complex division of labor compared to rural areas. Wirth argued that the size, density, and heterogeneity of urban populations shape the nature of social interactions and the social psychology of city dwellers, often leading to more formal and instrumental relationships, increased social tolerance for diversity, and a greater sense of individual freedom alongside potential feelings of social isolation or alienation. The study of urbanism explores how these unique social patterns and experiences in cities differ from those in more rural or traditional communities.
The validity_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Research Measurement' Causal relation: {Operational_Definition, Variable} → measures → {Correlation_Coefficient, Validity} Semantical explanation of validity_ID000001: Validity in research refers to the extent to which a measurement instrument, test, or research study accurately measures precisely what it is intended to measure, ensuring that the findings genuinely represent the phenomenon or concept being investigated. It addresses the question of whether the research is actually capturing the truth about what is being studied. Different types of validity are important in research, including internal validity (the extent to which the study establishes a trustworthy cause-and-effect relationship between variables), external validity (the extent to which the findings can be generalised to other populations, settings, or times), construct validity (the degree to which a measure assesses the theoretical construct it is supposed to measure), and content validity (the extent to which a measure adequately covers all aspects of the construct of interest). Ensuring validity is crucial for the credibility and meaningfulness of research findings.
The value_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Authority and Social Legitimacy' Causal relation: {Authority, Legitimacy} → legitimises → {Power, Value} Semantical explanation of value_ID000001: Value are culturally defined standards or principles that are widely shared by members of a society or group and serve as broad guidelines for social living, indicating what people assess as desirable, good, beautiful, right, or important. Value provide a moral compass for behaviour, influencing people's attitudes, choices, and actions across various aspects of life, and they often form the basis for social norms, which are more specific rules and expectations for behaviour. Value can vary significantly across different cultures and can change over time within a society, reflecting evolving beliefs and priorities. They play a crucial role in shaping social cohesion, cultural identity, and the overall character of a society, and they are often transmitted from one generation to the next through the process of socialisation.
The value_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Influence and Identity Formation' Causal relation: {Culture, Value} → hasInfluence → {Identity, Social_Role} Semantical explanation of value_ID000002: Value are culturally defined standards or principles that are widely shared by members of a society or group and serve as broad guidelines for social living, indicating what people assess as desirable, good, beautiful, right, or important. Value provide a moral compass for behaviour, influencing people's attitudes, choices, and actions across various aspects of life, and they often form the basis for social norms, which are more specific rules and expectations for behaviour. Value can vary significantly across different cultures and can change over time within a society, reflecting evolving beliefs and priorities. They play a crucial role in shaping social cohesion, cultural identity, and the overall character of a society, and they are often transmitted from one generation to the next through the process of socialisation.
The value_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Cultural Influence and Social Change' Causal relation: {Culture, Value} → hasInfluence → {Social_Change, Social_Structure} Semantical explanation of value_ID000003: Value are culturally defined standards or principles that are widely shared by members of a society or group and serve as broad guidelines for social living, indicating what people assess as desirable, good, beautiful, right, or important. Value provide a moral compass for behaviour, influencing people's attitudes, choices, and actions across various aspects of life, and they often form the basis for social norms, which are more specific rules and expectations for behaviour. Value can vary significantly across different cultures and can change over time within a society, reflecting evolving beliefs and priorities. They play a crucial role in shaping social cohesion, cultural identity, and the overall character of a society, and they are often transmitted from one generation to the next through the process of socialisation.
The value_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Intergenerational Cultural Transmission' Causal relation: {Cultural_Transmission, Language} → preserves → {Culture, Value} Semantical explanation of value_ID000004: Value are culturally defined standards or principles that are widely shared by members of a society or group and serve as broad guidelines for social living, indicating what people assess as desirable, good, beautiful, right, or important. Value provide a moral compass for behaviour, influencing people's attitudes, choices, and actions across various aspects of life, and they often form the basis for social norms, which are more specific rules and expectations for behaviour. Value can vary significantly across different cultures and can change over time within a society, reflecting evolving beliefs and priorities. They play a crucial role in shaping social cohesion, cultural identity, and the overall character of a society, and they are often transmitted from one generation to the next through the process of socialisation.
The value_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Intergenerational Cultural Transmission' Causal relation: {Primary_Socialisation, Family} → transmits → {Cultural_Transmission, Value} Semantical explanation of value_ID000005: Value are culturally defined standards or principles that are widely shared by members of a society or group and serve as broad guidelines for social living, indicating what people assess as desirable, good, beautiful, right, or important. Value provide a moral compass for behaviour, influencing people's attitudes, choices, and actions across various aspects of life, and they often form the basis for social norms, which are more specific rules and expectations for behaviour. Value can vary significantly across different cultures and can change over time within a society, reflecting evolving beliefs and priorities. They play a crucial role in shaping social cohesion, cultural identity, and the overall character of a society, and they are often transmitted from one generation to the next through the process of socialisation.
The value_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Primary Socialisation and Identity Formation' Causal relation: {Primary_Socialisation, Family, Education} → socialises → {Identity, Value, Social_Role} Semantical explanation of value_ID000006: Value are culturally defined standards or principles that are widely shared by members of a society or group and serve as broad guidelines for social living, indicating what people assess as desirable, good, beautiful, right, or important. Value provide a moral compass for behaviour, influencing people's attitudes, choices, and actions across various aspects of life, and they often form the basis for social norms, which are more specific rules and expectations for behaviour. Value can vary significantly across different cultures and can change over time within a society, reflecting evolving beliefs and priorities. They play a crucial role in shaping social cohesion, cultural identity, and the overall character of a society, and they are often transmitted from one generation to the next through the process of socialisation.
The value_ID000007 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Religious Socialisation and Moral Development' Causal relation: {Religion, Religious_Ritual} → socialises → {Value, Socialisation} Semantical explanation of value_ID000007: Value are culturally defined standards or principles that are widely shared by members of a society or group and serve as broad guidelines for social living, indicating what people assess as desirable, good, beautiful, right, or important. Value provide a moral compass for behaviour, influencing people's attitudes, choices, and actions across various aspects of life, and they often form the basis for social norms, which are more specific rules and expectations for behaviour. Value can vary significantly across different cultures and can change over time within a society, reflecting evolving beliefs and priorities. They play a crucial role in shaping social cohesion, cultural identity, and the overall character of a society, and they are often transmitted from one generation to the next through the process of socialisation.
The variable_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Research Measurement' Causal relation: {Operational_Definition, Variable} → measures → {Correlation_Coefficient, Validity} Semantical explanation of variable_ID000001: A variable is a concept or characteristic whose value or attribute changes or varies from one case to another, or across different individuals, groups, situations, or over time. It is a dimension along which an object, individual, or group can be categorised or measured, allowing for specific comparisons to be made with others or across different points in time. Examples of variables in sociological research include income level (which can vary from person to person), age (which changes over time for an individual), educational attainment (which differs among individuals), or social class (which can vary across groups or societies). Researchers examine the relationships between different variables to understand social phenomena, test hypotheses, and develop sociological theories. Variables can be independent (the presumed cause) or dependent (the presumed effect) in a causal relationship.
The white-collar_Crime_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Corporate Crime and Organisational Deviance' Causal relation: {White-collar_Crime, Corporate_Crime} → influencesHistorically → {Economic_System, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of white-collar_Crime_ID000001: White-collar crime refers to a range of financially motivated nonviolent crimes that are typically committed by affluent individuals or corporations in the course of their daily business or professional activities, often involving deception, fraud, or breach of trust. These crimes can include offenses such as embezzlement, tax evasion, insider trading, securities fraud, corporate fraud, bribery, and environmental violations. Unlike street crimes that often involve physical violence or property damage, white-collar crimes typically involve financial manipulation and can result in significant economic losses to individuals, organisations, and society as a whole, as well as eroding public trust in institutions and markets. Despite often being less visible than other forms of crime, white-collar crime can have far-reaching and damaging consequences.
The working_Class_ID000001 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Automation and Labor Displacement' Causal relation: {Innovation, Internet} → automates → {Economy, Working_Class} Semantical explanation of working_Class_ID000001: The working class is a social class broadly composed of people who are primarily involved in blue-collar or manual occupations, typically involving physical labor and often in industries such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, and agriculture. Membership in the working class is often defined by the type of work performed and may be associated with lower levels of formal education and income compared to the middle or upper classes. Historically, the working class has played a significant role in industrial societies, and their labor is essential for the production of goods and services. The term can also encompass those in lower-skilled service sector jobs. While the specific boundaries and characteristics of the working class can vary across different societies and over time, it generally refers to individuals and families who rely on wages or salaries from manual or less skilled labor for their primary source of income and who may have less economic security and social mobility compared to other social classes.
The working_Class_ID000002 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Capitalist Labor Exploitation' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Mass_Production} → exploits → {Working_Class, Proletariat} Semantical explanation of working_Class_ID000002: The working class is a social class broadly composed of people who are primarily involved in blue-collar or manual occupations, typically involving physical labor and often in industries such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, and agriculture. Membership in the working class is often defined by the type of work performed and may be associated with lower levels of formal education and income compared to the middle or upper classes. Historically, the working class has played a significant role in industrial societies, and their labor is essential for the production of goods and services. The term can also encompass those in lower-skilled service sector jobs. While the specific boundaries and characteristics of the working class can vary across different societies and over time, it generally refers to individuals and families who rely on wages or salaries from manual or less skilled labor for their primary source of income and who may have less economic security and social mobility compared to other social classes.
The working_Class_ID000003 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Capitalist Production and Class Formation' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Mass_Production, Industrialism} → stratifies → {Working_Class, Bourgeoisie, Social_Inequality} Semantical explanation of working_Class_ID000003: The working class is a social class broadly composed of people who are primarily involved in blue-collar or manual occupations, typically involving physical labor and often in industries such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, and agriculture. Membership in the working class is often defined by the type of work performed and may be associated with lower levels of formal education and income compared to the middle or upper classes. Historically, the working class has played a significant role in industrial societies, and their labor is essential for the production of goods and services. The term can also encompass those in lower-skilled service sector jobs. While the specific boundaries and characteristics of the working class can vary across different societies and over time, it generally refers to individuals and families who rely on wages or salaries from manual or less skilled labor for their primary source of income and who may have less economic security and social mobility compared to other social classes.
The working_Class_ID000004 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Capitalist Property Relations and Market Structure' Causal relation: {Capitalism, Means_Of_Production} → economicallyRelatedTo → {Working_Class, Bourgeoisie} Semantical explanation of working_Class_ID000004: The working class is a social class broadly composed of people who are primarily involved in blue-collar or manual occupations, typically involving physical labor and often in industries such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, and agriculture. Membership in the working class is often defined by the type of work performed and may be associated with lower levels of formal education and income compared to the middle or upper classes. Historically, the working class has played a significant role in industrial societies, and their labor is essential for the production of goods and services. The term can also encompass those in lower-skilled service sector jobs. While the specific boundaries and characteristics of the working class can vary across different societies and over time, it generally refers to individuals and families who rely on wages or salaries from manual or less skilled labor for their primary source of income and who may have less economic security and social mobility compared to other social classes.
The working_Class_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Corporate Labor Exploitation' Causal relation: {Multinational_Corporation, Sweatshop} → exploits → {Exploitation_Theory, Working_Class} Semantical explanation of working_Class_ID000005: The working class is a social class broadly composed of people who are primarily involved in blue-collar or manual occupations, typically involving physical labor and often in industries such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, and agriculture. Membership in the working class is often defined by the type of work performed and may be associated with lower levels of formal education and income compared to the middle or upper classes. Historically, the working class has played a significant role in industrial societies, and their labor is essential for the production of goods and services. The term can also encompass those in lower-skilled service sector jobs. While the specific boundaries and characteristics of the working class can vary across different societies and over time, it generally refers to individuals and families who rely on wages or salaries from manual or less skilled labor for their primary source of income and who may have less economic security and social mobility compared to other social classes.
The working_Class_ID000006 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Deindustrialisation and Urban Decline' Causal relation: {Deindustrialisation, Economic_System} → influencesHistorically → {Working_Class, Relative_Deprivation} Semantical explanation of working_Class_ID000006: The working class is a social class broadly composed of people who are primarily involved in blue-collar or manual occupations, typically involving physical labor and often in industries such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, and agriculture. Membership in the working class is often defined by the type of work performed and may be associated with lower levels of formal education and income compared to the middle or upper classes. Historically, the working class has played a significant role in industrial societies, and their labor is essential for the production of goods and services. The term can also encompass those in lower-skilled service sector jobs. While the specific boundaries and characteristics of the working class can vary across different societies and over time, it generally refers to individuals and families who rely on wages or salaries from manual or less skilled labor for their primary source of income and who may have less economic security and social mobility compared to other social classes.
The working_Class_ID000007 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Gender Employment Discrimination' Causal relation: {Gender_Inequality, Patriarchy} → discriminatesAgainst → {Gender_Stratification, Working_Class} Semantical explanation of working_Class_ID000007: The working class is a social class broadly composed of people who are primarily involved in blue-collar or manual occupations, typically involving physical labor and often in industries such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, and agriculture. Membership in the working class is often defined by the type of work performed and may be associated with lower levels of formal education and income compared to the middle or upper classes. Historically, the working class has played a significant role in industrial societies, and their labor is essential for the production of goods and services. The term can also encompass those in lower-skilled service sector jobs. While the specific boundaries and characteristics of the working class can vary across different societies and over time, it generally refers to individuals and families who rely on wages or salaries from manual or less skilled labor for their primary source of income and who may have less economic security and social mobility compared to other social classes.
The working_Class_ID000008 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Gentrification and Residential Displacement' Causal relation: {Gentrification, Urban_Renewal} → excludes → {Working_Class, Poverty} Semantical explanation of working_Class_ID000008: The working class is a social class broadly composed of people who are primarily involved in blue-collar or manual occupations, typically involving physical labor and often in industries such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, and agriculture. Membership in the working class is often defined by the type of work performed and may be associated with lower levels of formal education and income compared to the middle or upper classes. Historically, the working class has played a significant role in industrial societies, and their labor is essential for the production of goods and services. The term can also encompass those in lower-skilled service sector jobs. While the specific boundaries and characteristics of the working class can vary across different societies and over time, it generally refers to individuals and families who rely on wages or salaries from manual or less skilled labor for their primary source of income and who may have less economic security and social mobility compared to other social classes.
The working_Class_ID000009 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Gentrification Transforms Neighborhoods' Causal relation: {Gentrification} → gentrifies → {Working_Class} Semantical explanation of working_Class_ID000009: The working class is a social class broadly composed of people who are primarily involved in blue-collar or manual occupations, typically involving physical labor and often in industries such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, and agriculture. Membership in the working class is often defined by the type of work performed and may be associated with lower levels of formal education and income compared to the middle or upper classes. Historically, the working class has played a significant role in industrial societies, and their labor is essential for the production of goods and services. The term can also encompass those in lower-skilled service sector jobs. While the specific boundaries and characteristics of the working class can vary across different societies and over time, it generally refers to individuals and families who rely on wages or salaries from manual or less skilled labor for their primary source of income and who may have less economic security and social mobility compared to other social classes.
The working_Class_ID000010 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Industrial Revolution and Urban Development' Causal relation: {Industrial_Revolution, Industrialism} → urbanises → {Industrial_City, Working_Class} Semantical explanation of working_Class_ID000010: The working class is a social class broadly composed of people who are primarily involved in blue-collar or manual occupations, typically involving physical labor and often in industries such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, and agriculture. Membership in the working class is often defined by the type of work performed and may be associated with lower levels of formal education and income compared to the middle or upper classes. Historically, the working class has played a significant role in industrial societies, and their labor is essential for the production of goods and services. The term can also encompass those in lower-skilled service sector jobs. While the specific boundaries and characteristics of the working class can vary across different societies and over time, it generally refers to individuals and families who rely on wages or salaries from manual or less skilled labor for their primary source of income and who may have less economic security and social mobility compared to other social classes.
The working_Class_ID000011 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Labor Market Employment Relations' Causal relation: {Multinational_Corporation, Bureaucracy} → employs → {Working_Class, Proletariat} Semantical explanation of working_Class_ID000011: The working class is a social class broadly composed of people who are primarily involved in blue-collar or manual occupations, typically involving physical labor and often in industries such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, and agriculture. Membership in the working class is often defined by the type of work performed and may be associated with lower levels of formal education and income compared to the middle or upper classes. Historically, the working class has played a significant role in industrial societies, and their labor is essential for the production of goods and services. The term can also encompass those in lower-skilled service sector jobs. While the specific boundaries and characteristics of the working class can vary across different societies and over time, it generally refers to individuals and families who rely on wages or salaries from manual or less skilled labor for their primary source of income and who may have less economic security and social mobility compared to other social classes.
The working_Class_ID000012 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Labor Movement Resistance' Causal relation: {Labour_Union, Trade_Union} → protests → {Strike, Working_Class} Semantical explanation of working_Class_ID000012: The working class is a social class broadly composed of people who are primarily involved in blue-collar or manual occupations, typically involving physical labor and often in industries such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, and agriculture. Membership in the working class is often defined by the type of work performed and may be associated with lower levels of formal education and income compared to the middle or upper classes. Historically, the working class has played a significant role in industrial societies, and their labor is essential for the production of goods and services. The term can also encompass those in lower-skilled service sector jobs. While the specific boundaries and characteristics of the working class can vary across different societies and over time, it generally refers to individuals and families who rely on wages or salaries from manual or less skilled labor for their primary source of income and who may have less economic security and social mobility compared to other social classes.
The working_Class_ID000013 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Urban Gentrification and Social Displacement' Causal relation: {Gentrification, Urban_Renewal} → gentrifies → {Working_Class, Social_Class} Semantical explanation of working_Class_ID000013: The working class is a social class broadly composed of people who are primarily involved in blue-collar or manual occupations, typically involving physical labor and often in industries such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, and agriculture. Membership in the working class is often defined by the type of work performed and may be associated with lower levels of formal education and income compared to the middle or upper classes. Historically, the working class has played a significant role in industrial societies, and their labor is essential for the production of goods and services. The term can also encompass those in lower-skilled service sector jobs. While the specific boundaries and characteristics of the working class can vary across different societies and over time, it generally refers to individuals and families who rely on wages or salaries from manual or less skilled labor for their primary source of income and who may have less economic security and social mobility compared to other social classes.
The working_Class_ID000014 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Urban Gentrification Displacement' Causal relation: {Gentrification, Urban_Renewal} → gentrifies → {Working_Class, Social_Exclusion} Semantical explanation of working_Class_ID000014: The working class is a social class broadly composed of people who are primarily involved in blue-collar or manual occupations, typically involving physical labor and often in industries such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, and agriculture. Membership in the working class is often defined by the type of work performed and may be associated with lower levels of formal education and income compared to the middle or upper classes. Historically, the working class has played a significant role in industrial societies, and their labor is essential for the production of goods and services. The term can also encompass those in lower-skilled service sector jobs. While the specific boundaries and characteristics of the working class can vary across different societies and over time, it generally refers to individuals and families who rely on wages or salaries from manual or less skilled labor for their primary source of income and who may have less economic security and social mobility compared to other social classes.
The world_System_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'World System Economic Integration' Causal relation: {World_System, Multinational_Corporation} → controls → {Core_Country, Peripheral_Country} Semantical explanation of world_System_ID000001: World-systems theory, pioneered by sociologist Immanuel Wallerstein, is a macro-level perspective that emphasises the interconnections and interdependence among countries based on the historical expansion and current functioning of a global capitalist world economy. This theory posits that the world economy is not a collection of independent national economies but rather a single, integrated system characterised by a global division of labor and a hierarchical structure consisting of three main categories of countries: core countries, which are the wealthy, industrialised nations that dominate the global economy and control advanced technology and capital; semi-peripheral countries, which occupy an intermediate position, often supplying labor and raw materials to the core and serving as a buffer between the core and the periphery, with some level of industrialisation and potential for upward or downward mobility within the system; and peripheral countries, which have a marginal role in the world economy, often specializing in the production of raw materials and agricultural goods for the core, and are thus economically dependent on and often exploited by the core countries in unequal trading relationships. This theory highlights how the dynamics of the global capitalist system shape the economic development and social structures of nations within it, emphasizing historical processes of colonialism and neocolonialism in creating and maintaining global inequalities.
The youth_Culture_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Media and Youth Cultural Influence' Causal relation: {Mass_Media, Peer_Group, Youth_Culture} → hasInfluence → {Fashion, Culture} Semantical explanation of youth_Culture_ID000001: Youth culture refers to the specific cultural attributes, norms, values, practices, styles, and forms of expression exhibited by many young people within a particular period or society, often characterised by a sense of shared identity, interests, and experiences that are distinct from those of other age groups, particularly adults. Youth culture can manifest in various aspects of life, including behavioural norms, dress codes, language use (such as slang), musical preferences, leisure activities, and attitudes towards social issues, many of which tend to differ from the prevailing adult culture of the time and may even represent a form of rebellion or a search for autonomy and identity formation during the transitional period of adolescence and young adulthood. Youth cultures are dynamic and can change rapidly, often influenced by popular media, technology, and social trends, and they can play a significant role in shaping broader cultural landscapes and driving social change.
The youth_Culture_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Youth Mobilisation and Social Change' Causal relation: {Youth_Culture, Social_Movement} → mobilises → {Social_Change, Culture} Semantical explanation of youth_Culture_ID000002: Youth culture refers to the specific cultural attributes, norms, values, practices, styles, and forms of expression exhibited by many young people within a particular period or society, often characterised by a sense of shared identity, interests, and experiences that are distinct from those of other age groups, particularly adults. Youth culture can manifest in various aspects of life, including behavioural norms, dress codes, language use (such as slang), musical preferences, leisure activities, and attitudes towards social issues, many of which tend to differ from the prevailing adult culture of the time and may even represent a form of rebellion or a search for autonomy and identity formation during the transitional period of adolescence and young adulthood. Youth cultures are dynamic and can change rapidly, often influenced by popular media, technology, and social trends, and they can play a significant role in shaping broader cultural landscapes and driving social change.
The political_Action_Committee_(PAC)_ID000001 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Civil Rights Advocacy' Causal relation: {Affirmative_Action, Political_Action_Committee_(PAC)} → advocates → {Minority_Group, Social_Movement} Semantical explanation of political_Action_Committee_(PAC)_ID000001: A political action committee (PAC) is a political committee that is typically established by an interest group—such as a national bank, corporation, trade association, cooperative, or membership association—for the specific purpose of soliciting and distributing financial contributions to candidates running for political office or to political parties. PACs are a significant part of the campaign finance system in many democracies, allowing organised groups to pool resources and support candidates who align with their interests and policy objectives. The regulations governing PACs, including the amount of money they can raise and contribute, vary depending on the jurisdiction.
The political_Action_Committee_(PAC)_ID000002 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Interest Group Political Advocacy' Causal relation: {Interest_Group, Political_Action_Committee_(PAC)} → advocates → {Political_System, Democracy} Semantical explanation of political_Action_Committee_(PAC)_ID000002: A political action committee (PAC) is a political committee that is typically established by an interest group—such as a national bank, corporation, trade association, cooperative, or membership association—for the specific purpose of soliciting and distributing financial contributions to candidates running for political office or to political parties. PACs are a significant part of the campaign finance system in many democracies, allowing organised groups to pool resources and support candidates who align with their interests and policy objectives. The regulations governing PACs, including the amount of money they can raise and contribute, vary depending on the jurisdiction.
The political_Action_Committee_(PAC)_ID000003 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Political Resource Mobilisation' Causal relation: {Political_Action_Committee_(PAC), Interest_Group} → mobilises → {Resource_Mobilisation, Politics} Semantical explanation of political_Action_Committee_(PAC)_ID000003: A political action committee (PAC) is a political committee that is typically established by an interest group—such as a national bank, corporation, trade association, cooperative, or membership association—for the specific purpose of soliciting and distributing financial contributions to candidates running for political office or to political parties. PACs are a significant part of the campaign finance system in many democracies, allowing organised groups to pool resources and support candidates who align with their interests and policy objectives. The regulations governing PACs, including the amount of money they can raise and contribute, vary depending on the jurisdiction.
The political_Action_Committee_(PAC)_ID000004 named individual (as part of the domain parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Resource Mobilisation for Collective Action' Causal relation: {Resource_Mobilisation, Political_Action_Committee_(PAC)} → mobilises → {Social_Movement, Strike} Semantical explanation of political_Action_Committee_(PAC)_ID000004: A political action committee (PAC) is a political committee that is typically established by an interest group—such as a national bank, corporation, trade association, cooperative, or membership association—for the specific purpose of soliciting and distributing financial contributions to candidates running for political office or to political parties. PACs are a significant part of the campaign finance system in many democracies, allowing organised groups to pool resources and support candidates who align with their interests and policy objectives. The regulations governing PACs, including the amount of money they can raise and contribute, vary depending on the jurisdiction.
The political_Action_Committee_(PAC)_ID000005 named individual (as part of the range parameter set) is associated to the relation: 'Social Movement Organisation' Causal relation: {Social_Movement, Resource_Mobilisation} → coordinates → {Coalition, Political_Action_Committee_(PAC)} Semantical explanation of political_Action_Committee_(PAC)_ID000005: A political action committee (PAC) is a political committee that is typically established by an interest group—such as a national bank, corporation, trade association, cooperative, or membership association—for the specific purpose of soliciting and distributing financial contributions to candidates running for political office or to political parties. PACs are a significant part of the campaign finance system in many democracies, allowing organised groups to pool resources and support candidates who align with their interests and policy objectives. The regulations governing PACs, including the amount of money they can raise and contribute, vary depending on the jurisdiction.
Alternative_Cultural_Formations_And_Behaviour represents social phenomena that emerge as variations, challenges, or alternatives to dominant cultural patterns and mainstream social arrangements. This class encompasses subcultures that deliberately oppose mainstream values (Counterculture, Deviant_Subculture), alternative relationship arrangements that exist outside traditional marriage (Cohabitation), and dynamic cultural expressions that reflect temporary collective preferences (Fashion). It also includes informal behavioural norms that guide everyday social interaction (Folkway) and theoretical concepts that explain unintended social consequences (Latent_Function). These phenomena demonstrate the diversity and adaptability of human social organisation, showing how societies accommodate difference, manage deviance, and generate new forms of cultural expression. This grouping highlights the dynamic tension between conformity and innovation that characterises all social systems.
Social_Cognitive_And_Behavioural_Disposition encompasses the inherent tendencies and capacities that shape how individuals and groups perceive, interpret, and respond to social situations and cultural differences. This class includes cognitive dispositions such as the tendency to view one's own culture as superior (Ethnocentrism), the capacity for systematic calculation and goal achievement (Rationality), and the ability to connect personal experiences with broader social patterns (Sociological_Imagination). It encompasses behavioural tendencies toward emotional support and group harmony (Expressiveness) versus task-oriented external focus (Instrumentality), and the capacity for multilingual communication (Bilingualism). The class also includes structural dispositions such as market control tendencies (Monopoly), migration-influencing factors (Push_And_Pull_Factor), and resistance to change based on established interests (Vested_Interest), as well as opportunities shaped by social position (Life_Chance). These dispositions collectively represent the diverse ways social actors are oriented toward their social environment.